Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity Lawsuit Filed

Yaroslavl (Russia) court orders parents of pupil who used a neural network to turn his filmed teacher into a bare-chested man in a video to pay her damages

A court in Yaroslavl, Russia, ordered the parents of a seventh-grade pupil to pay a mathematics teacher 10,000 roubles each in compensation for moral harm, according to reports in March 2026 of the court's own announcement. The court's press service said that in February 2025 the boy filmed the teacher at work without her knowledge or consent, then used a neural network to generate a video from the footage in which she turns into a man with a bare athletic torso, and posted it in the class chat. The teacher told the court that afterwards she did not want to go back into the classroom, felt the pupils' sideways looks and that her authority had been damaged. The parents contested the claim, saying their son had only applied a trending effect and that the teacher disliked him; they did not dispute that he filmed her and made the video. The court found that the video harmed her honour, dignity and professional reputation.

AI system
Unidentified video tool
Occurred
Feb 2025
Reported
16 March 2026
Event location
Russia
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Reputational HarmPsychological DistressProfessional Harm
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Education · Work
Evidence
AI involvement supported · Causal attribution supported · 3 sources, 1 underlying account
4 claims: 4 reported. 3 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: A neural-network video effect applied by a pupil to classroom footage of his teacher, generating a video in which she turns into a bare-chested man; the court's press service describes it as created with a neural network, and no tool or app is named

What Happened

The video. According to the court's press service, as reported by Mel and Moskovskoye Vremya, in February 2025 a seventh-grade pupil filmed his mathematics teacher at work without her knowledge or consent. Using a neural network, he generated a video from the footage in which the teacher turns into a man with a bare, athletic torso, and he published it in the class chat.

The harm. The teacher sued the boy's parents. She told the court that spreading the video damaged her authority and created negative opinion about her, that afterwards she did not want to enter the classroom, felt the pupils' sideways looks and felt ashamed.

The ruling. The parents did not accept the claim. They argued that their son had only used a trending effect and had not invented the plot, that the video was not defamatory, and that the teacher disliked their child; they did not dispute that he filmed her and created the video. The court rejected their arguments, found that the seventh-grader's dissemination of the video harmed her honour, dignity and professional reputation and caused her moral suffering, and ordered each parent to pay 10,000 roubles in compensation.

What is not known. The school, the court's case number, the date of the judgment and the app or tool used are not reported. The judgment itself was not read; all three reports relay the court's own announcement.

Reported harm

The teacher told the court the video damaged her authority and left her ashamed and reluctant to enter the classroom; the court found moral harm and awarded 20,000 roubles in total.

How Harm Occurred

A pupil used a neural network to turn classroom footage of his teacher, filmed without consent, into a video of her becoming a bare-chested man and posted it in the class chat; the teacher told the court it left her ashamed and undermined her authority.

Outcome

Resolved

The court ordered the pupil's mother and father to pay the teacher 10,000 roubles each in compensation for moral harm (court press service as reported by Mel on 16 March 2026 and by Altapress, citing TASS, on 17 March 2026). Moskovskoye Vremya (25 March 2026) attributes further explanation of the case to the Yaroslavl Regional Court. No appeal outcome was found.

What remains unknown

  • The school, the court of first instance, the case number and the date of the judgment.
  • The app or tool used to generate the video.
  • Whether the ruling was appealed.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: supported. The court's press service, reporting a ruling in the teacher's civil claim, says the pupil used a neural network to generate, from footage of the teacher, a video in which she turns into a bare-chested man; the parents did not dispute that he created the video and said he had applied a trending effect. The generated video depicting her is what circulated in the class chat and what the court found harmed her honour and reputation.

4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported The court's press service says that in February 2025 a seventh-grade pupil filmed his teacher at work without her knowledge or consent and used a neural network to generate a video from it in which she turns into a man with a bare athletic torso, which he posted in the class chat.

Causal attribution. Court press-service account relayed by three outlets (one origin); the parents did not dispute the filming or the video.

  • mel.fm(opens in new tab) supports · Russian
    'Инцидент произошел в феврале 2025 года, когда ученик снял на видео преподавательницу математики одной из школ города на уроке без ее ведома и согласия.'; 'Затем с помощью нейросети на основе полученного изображения подросток сгенерировал видео, в котором педагог превращается в мужчину с обнаженным торсом атлетического сложения, и опубликовал этот ролик в чате класса.'
  • mskvremya.ru(opens in new tab) supports · Russian
    'В пресс-службе суда рассказали, что инцидент произошел в феврале 2025 года.'
  • altapress.ru(opens in new tab) supports · Russian
    'Видео разлетелось по чату класса, и педагог, узнав об этом, обратилась в суд с иском к родителям ученика.'
Reported The teacher told the court that afterwards she did not want to return to the classroom, felt the pupils' sideways looks and that her authority among the pupils had been damaged.

Causal attribution. The teacher's account to the court, as relayed from the court's announcement.

  • mel.fm(opens in new tab) supports · Russian
    'Женщина рассказала в заявлении, что после произошедшего не хотела возвращаться в класс, чувствовала на себе косые взгляды детей, а ее авторитет среди учеников пошатнулся.'
  • mskvremya.ru(opens in new tab) supports · Russian
    'В суде педагог пояснила, что распространение такого контента нанесло урон ее авторитету, сформировало негативное общественное мнение.'
Reported The parents contested the claim, saying their son had only applied a trending effect and had not invented the plot and that the teacher disliked him; they did not dispute that he filmed her and created the video.

Causal attribution. The parents' position as reported from the court's announcement.

  • mel.fm(opens in new tab) supports · Russian
    'Родители ученика иск не признали, однако не стали оспаривать, что их сын снял на телефон учителя и создал видео. При этом они отметили, что мальчик не сам придумал сюжет ролика, а лишь применил трендовый эффект.'
  • altapress.ru(opens in new tab) supports · Russian
    'Мать и отец школьника пытались оправдаться: утверждали, что сын использовал трендовый эффект и сам сюжет не придумывал.'
Reported The court found that the seventh-grader's dissemination of the video harmed the teacher's honour, dignity and professional reputation and caused her moral suffering, and ordered each parent to pay her 10,000 roubles.

Causal attribution. The court's ruling as announced by its press service; the judgment text was not read, so the claim is reported.

  • mel.fm(opens in new tab) supports · Russian
    'Суд пришел к выводу, что истцу по вине семиклассника, распространившего сведения, порочащие ее честь, достоинство и деловую репутацию, причинены нравственные страдания.'; 'С матери и отца школьника суд взыскал компенсацию морального вреда в размере 10 тысяч рублей с каждого.'
  • mskvremya.ru(opens in new tab) supports · Russian
    'Суд обязал родителей семиклассника выплатить компенсацию морального вреда за видео с учителем, созданное их ребенком с помощью нейросети.'
  • altapress.ru(opens in new tab) supports · Russian
    'Суд пришел к выводу, что распространенное видео порочит честь, достоинство и деловую репутацию учительницы.'; 'Суд взыскал с каждого из родителей по 10 тысяч рублей компенсации морального вреда.'

Sources

3 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-27 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Education news site reporting the court's announcement on its VK page, 16 March 2026; HTTP 200. Applies to s1.

Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-27 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Moscow newspaper reporting the court press service's account, 25 March 2026; HTTP 200. Applies to s2.

Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-27 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Regional news site relaying TASS, 17 March 2026; HTTP 200. Applies to s3.

Event countries: Russia. Affected-person countries: Russia. Court countries: Russia.

The reports place the filming in a lesson at a school in the city of Yaroslavl, Russia, where the teacher works; the case was decided by a Yaroslavl court.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-27: Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): a court's own announcement says a pupil generated a video of his teacher with a neural network and posted it in the class chat, and the court awarded her compensation for the resulting moral harm. The teacher and pupil are not named and the school is not identified.

People described

A mathematics teacher at a school in Yaroslavl who was filmed in class without her consent and depicted in the generated video

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person: the teacher depicted in the video, to whom the court awarded compensation.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#ai_generated_video#school#teacher#civil_damages#russia

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Yaroslavl (Russia) court orders parents of pupil who used a neural network to turn his filmed teacher into a bare-chested man in a video to pay her damages. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-yaroslavl-court-orders-parents-of-pupil-who-made-ai-video-turning-teacher-into-bare-chested-man-to-pay-her-damages

BibTeX

@misc{2025_yaroslavl_court_orders_parents_of_pupil_who_made_ai_video_turning_teacher_into_bare_chested_man_to_pay_her_damages,
  title = {Yaroslavl (Russia) court orders parents of pupil who used a neural network to turn his filmed teacher into a bare-chested man in a video to pay her damages},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-yaroslavl-court-orders-parents-of-pupil-who-made-ai-video-turning-teacher-into-bare-chested-man-to-pay-her-damages}
}

Related cases

Medium Unidentified image tool

Los Banos, California: a substitute teacher says a sexualised AI image of him made from an old selfie circulated among middle-school students on TikTok and Snapchat and was used by a student account impersonating him; one student received in-school suspension and he stopped taking assignments at the middle school

WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of a substitute teacher in Los Banos, California, who spoke to WIRED by name (not repeated here). On 12 March 2026 a co-worker at his other job told him an AI photo was circulating on social media; the image reused a mirror selfie he had taken at a job in college but showed him in lingerie, posing suggestively. He traced an account sharing it on TikTok to a student at the middle school where he regularly substituted and reported it to the assistant principal; that evening he found a second account, created by a different student, impersonating him under a misspelled version of his name with the image as its profile picture. Over the following weeks he dealt with administrators, parents and the police; one student who admitted creating the image received an in-school suspension. He says the image was also shared on Snapchat, kept spreading among students and drew crude sexual comments on his TikTok account. He told administrators he would not take assignments at the middle school until the matter was addressed; at the local high school the same image was AirDropped to him during a class. WIRED says the district did not respond to its request for comment. He said he does not feel safe returning to the district. The Los Banos Enterprise (25 August 2026) summarised the WIRED account; no independent local reporting was found.

Medium Unidentified video tool (suspected)

A middle-school teacher says a TikTok account that looked AI-generated impersonated her, including videos of her talking about sexual acts that students believed were real; the student said to be behind it then harassed her in person until leaving the district

WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of a middle-school teacher in her mid-twenties who spoke anonymously because her district had not given her permission. A few months before WIRED's report, she says, she learned from a student about a TikTok account impersonating her. She says the videos looked AI-generated: her face had an artificial smoothness, her mouth moved unnaturally and the voice did not match hers. Some videos showed her skydiving or doing backflips; others depicted her talking about sexual acts. She says many of the students who warned her believed it was her account. She told her principal and says she was still unnerved by it; some students told her a classmate had made it, and after she asked students to report it the account was quickly taken down. She says the same student then harassed her in person with escalating insults; the principal removed the student from her class, and the harassment continued until the student left the district. WIRED gives no location for her school.

Medium Unidentified video tool (suspected)

UK: a trades-college staff member says a student reported that a video showing her undressing, which appeared to be a manipulated version of an apparently real video of her talking with a student, was circulating among classmates; she stepped away from the class for weeks and says the atmosphere had chilled on her return

WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of a staff member at a UK college that trains 16-to-19-year-olds in trades such as construction, whose job combines administration with a counselling role; WIRED identifies her by first name only, which is not repeated here. She says administrators told her this winter that a student had reported two videos circulating among classmates: one apparently real, showing her talking with a student, and one that appeared to be a manipulated version showing her taking her clothes off and dancing in underwear or a bikini. The student she suspected denied making it when questioned and soon dropped out. The college let her step away from the class for a few weeks and educated students about deepfakes; she says the atmosphere had chilled when she returned and that the episode has made her more cautious. The college did not respond to WIRED.

Medium ChatGPT

Saginaw, Michigan: a credit union CEO used ChatGPT to put herself and family members in 'Lake America' sweatshirts in a photo taken before a trip to Halifax; after her sister reposted it publicly without its AI label she says she received death threats and the family came home early, and on 23 September 2026 the credit union said she was no longer employed

The chief executive of Family First Credit Union in Saginaw, Michigan, told WJRT (ABC12) that before boarding a flight to Halifax, Nova Scotia, on 11 September 2026 she and family members took a photo and put it through ChatGPT to show them wearing 'Lake America' sweatshirts, a joke about the US president's order renaming Lake Ontario. She posted it to her private Facebook page with a marker saying it contained AI content; her sister reposted it publicly without the marker while they were in Halifax, and it spread in Canada as if the family had worn the shirts. The backlash concerned the image's political message; she said she would understand the anger of anyone in Halifax who thought the family had walked in wearing those sweatshirts. She said she was getting death threats and the family returned early; by 16 September she was back in the US. She called the post poor judgment, said she would not use AI again and that AI 'can make people think something's real that's not'. On 23 September the credit union said she was no longer an employee, effective immediately; it has not said whether she resigned or was dismissed, or why.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents