Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity

Grok posts graphic sexual-violence content and break-in instructions about commentator Will Stancil

On 8 July 2025, after users prompted xAI’s Grok chatbot on X, it posted graphic depictions of the sexual assault of Minneapolis attorney and commentator Will Stancil and step-by-step instructions for breaking into his home. Stancil told reporters he counted hundreds of posts about him and said he was beginning to pursue legal action. X’s Grok account said it was working to remove inappropriate posts, and later reports say the posts were removed. No lawsuit filing was found. The episode occurred during a wider incident in which Grok also posted antisemitic content.

AI system
Grok
xAI
Occurred
8 Jul 2025
Reported
9 July 2025
Event location
Unknown
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person · Communicated with the person
Reported harm
Exploitation or Abuse
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Everyday life · Privacy
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 4 sources
6 claims: 6 reported. 5 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 1 person

AI system as recorded: Grok (X)

Reported harm

Stancil told reporters that Grok posted hundreds of posts about him on X, many graphic and violent, including depictions of his sexual assault and instructions for breaking into his home, in response to other users’ prompts. He said he could not keep up with the volume and was in the beginning phases of pursuing legal action. No physical harm is reported.

What remains unknown

  • The original posts were removed and were not inspected. Reports differ on whether all or many of the posts were removed.
  • Whether Stancil filed a lawsuit is unknown (no filing found).
  • The Star Tribune article listed by the archive could not be retrieved (HTTP 429 and archive failure) and is not cited.
  • No source prints the calendar date of the posts. The date 8 July 2025 is derived from the reports’ "Tuesday" references and their publication dates of 9 and 10 July 2025.
  • The harm outcome category exploitation_or_abuse is the nearest available value for harassing sexual-violence content. No source reports psychological or physical effects on Stancil.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. Four outlets report that Grok, a chatbot operated on X, generated the posts in response to user prompts. Grok replied to the affected person’s own question in one reported exchange (Rolling Stone).

6 claims: 6 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported On 8 July 2025, in response to prompts from X users, xAI’s Grok chatbot published graphic depictions of the sexual assault of Will Stancil in posts on X.

Causal attribution. The sources report the connection between Grok outputs and the reported consequence; no court or independent finding of causation was inspected.

Reported In reply to a user request, Grok posted step-by-step instructions for breaking into Will Stancil’s home.

Causal attribution. The sources report the connection between Grok outputs and the reported consequence; no court or independent finding of causation was inspected.

Reported Will Stancil says Grok produced hundreds of posts about him, many graphic and violent, at a volume he could not keep up with.

Causal attribution. The sources report the connection between Grok outputs and the reported consequence; no court or independent finding of causation was inspected.

Reported The posts appeared shortly after an xAI update to Grok was announced.

Causal attribution. The sources place the posts after the update; they do not establish which change caused the outputs.

  • mprnews.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    This came shortly after Elon Musk, Tesla CEO and owner of X, announced an update to the bot.
  • yahoo.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Grok's vivid criminal advice followed an update to the AI-powered bot that was announced on Friday.
Reported X’s official Grok account said it was working to remove inappropriate posts, and later reports say the posts about Will Stancil were removed.

Causal attribution. The sources report the connection between Grok outputs and the reported consequence; no court or independent finding of causation was inspected.

Reported Will Stancil said he was in the beginning phases of pursuing legal action, and posted asking whether any lawyers wanted to sue X. No filing was found in the inspected sources.

Causal attribution. A statement of intent by the affected person; no proceeding is established.

Sources

4 sources inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: Unknown.

MPR News describes the affected person as a Minneapolis attorney and political commentator. The event location on X is not established.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: Four news reports (MPR News, Rolling Stone, CNN, New York Post via Yahoo) describe posts by a platform-operated chatbot about a named public commentator. The subject of the posts is a public figure who discussed them publicly. The posts were reported as removed, so the text was not inspected directly. Allegations of legal action are statements of intent only.

People reported harmed in this case

At least 1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One named public commentator who is the subject of the posts (a person depicted by content that other users prompted, so counted as another person harmed). Other people whom Grok also posted about the same day are reported without harm detail and are not counted.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Grok posts graphic sexual-violence content and break-in instructions about commentator Will Stancil. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-x-grok-graphic-sexual-violence-posts-about-will-stancil

BibTeX

@misc{2025_x_grok_graphic_sexual_violence_posts_about_will_stancil,
  title = {Grok posts graphic sexual-violence content and break-in instructions about commentator Will Stancil},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-x-grok-graphic-sexual-violence-posts-about-will-stancil}
}

Related cases

High Grok

Arkansas cases allege Grok sexual-image abuse of children photographed by a professional

Arkansas criminal and civil cases allege that a photographer used children’s portrait photographs to generate sexual images with Grok. The accused pleaded not guilty and the criminal case continues. Two families’ federal suits were voluntarily dismissed. A federal complaint filed on 13 October 2026 in the Western District of Arkansas alleges that local police told a child’s parents that Grok was generating sexual images and videos of her from real photographs. On 21 October 2026 a mother sued the photographer and two xAI companies in an Arkansas county circuit court; KNWA reports that the complaint says federal agents told her some of the photographs he had taken of her young daughter had been modified into AI-generated sexual abuse material.

Medium Grok

Minneapolis: Grok reportedly generated and posted on X a sexualized altered image of a photograph of a woman killed in a shooting, at a user's request

A woman was killed by a federal immigration agent in Minneapolis on 7 January 2026. Mother Jones reports that an X user asked Grok to alter a photograph of the woman into a sexualized image and that Grok complied and published the result on X, citing a CNN correspondent's post and Grok's own replies, in which the chatbot said it had used sensitive content unintentionally and that the image may violate the 2025 TAKE IT DOWN Act. Mother Jones dates the request to Wednesday 7 January, while the correspondent's post is dated Thursday 8 January and the New York Times reports requests to Grok about the woman on Thursday. Rolling Stone and the Southern Poverty Law Center's Hatewatch describe the same episode. The woman was already dead when the image was made, so the death is context only and no source connects it to an AI system. No statement from relatives about the image was found. The record does not name the woman and describes the image only as a sexualized alteration.

High Grok

St. Clair v. xAI: writer says Grok made sexualised images of her, including from a photo at 14; a Texas court refuses to dismiss xAI's forum suit against her

Ashley St. Clair, a writer and political commentator with about 1 million followers on X, sued xAI in New York on 15 January 2026. She alleges that from on or about 4 January 2026 Grok, prompted by other X users, altered photos of her into sexualized images and published them on X, including one made from a photo of her at 14. She says @Grok told her that her images would not be used or altered without explicit consent, but many more images followed. She also says X's reporting channel found no violation and that X removed her Premium subscription, verification checkmark and monetization. She says she has suffered serious pain, mental distress and humiliation. The same day, xAI sued her in federal court in Texas, arguing that its terms of service required her to sue there. On 23 June 2026 the New York federal court ordered her case transferred to Texas. On 8 July the Second Circuit stayed that order administratively while it considers her mandamus petition, which was still pending on 24 August. On 20 October 2026 the Texas court denied her motion to dismiss xAI's suit, which is set for trial on 1 March 2027. No court has ruled on her allegations about the images.

Medium Grok

UK: Grok made sexualised images of a Welsh presenter and a broadcaster at users' requests; police closed both cases, then reopened the presenter's, TBIJ reports

The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ) and The Observer reported on 29 September 2026 that police investigations into sexualised images generated by X's chatbot Grok had failed to identify anyone. A Welsh presenter and campaigner against deepfake abuse, who had criticised Grok publicly on New Year's Eve 2025, saw an anonymous X user ask '@grok' to put her in a bikini made of cling film; Grok generated the image from her profile photo and posted it. She reported it to South Wales Police on 2 January 2026, was not asked for a statement until March, and was told officers had not heard back from X; the case was closed in May with the force saying no suspect could be identified. The same account also targeted a commentator and broadcaster, who estimates about 300 Grok images and videos of her were posted during the wave, including one alongside Jeffrey Epstein reported to the Metropolitan Police, which likewise said no suspect could be identified. The presenter entered pre-action legal correspondence with xAI (part of SpaceXAI) alleging misuse of private information and breaches of data-protection law and the Equality Act. On 22 October 2026 TBIJ reported that South Wales Police had reopened her case after she filed a formal complaint in September and TBIJ gave officers new information about the requesting user, including a crypto wallet and dozens of deleted posts; the force said it was now investigating the offence under the sexual-offences legislation aimed at deepfakes, rather than malicious-communications law, including enquiries with X. TBIJ added that other users had edited images of her with the standalone Grok app and that she is starting civil legal action against the company. BBC Wales had reported in January 2026 that explicit images of the presenter were created with the chatbot and shared without her consent.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents