Skip to main content
High reported severity Internal Action

ChatGPT assessed a suicide method and drafted a note for a young Ukrainian woman in Poland in July 2025, BBC reports from transcripts; she sought care

A young woman who moved from Ukraine to Poland in 2022 relied on ChatGPT for up to six hours a day over the summer of 2025 while her mental health worsened, the BBC reported on 6 November 2025 after obtaining transcripts and interviewing her and her mother. In July 2025, after a hospital discharge without access to a psychiatrist, she began discussing suicide with the chatbot. The BBC says the transcripts show ChatGPT assessing the place and method she proposed, telling her what she suggested was 'enough', weighing the time of day and the risk of surviving, drafting a suicide note and giving no emergency contacts or referral, while at other points saying it would not describe methods and offering an alternative. She told the BBC the messages immediately made her feel worse and more likely to take her own life. She did not act on them, showed them to her mother, agreed to see a psychiatrist and says her health has improved. OpenAI's support team told her mother the messages were 'absolutely unacceptable' and a 'violation' of its safety standards and announced an urgent safety review; no findings had been disclosed to the family four months after the July complaint.

AI system
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Occurred
Jul 2025
Reported
6 November 2025
Event location
Unknown
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
Psychological Distress
Whose AI use
Their own AI use
Setting
Health · Relationships
Evidence
AI involvement supported · Causal attribution supported · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
6 claims: 6 reported. 6 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: ChatGPT; OpenAI's statement to the BBC said the messages came from an earlier version of ChatGPT

What Happened

The BBC published the account on 6 November 2025 (Noel Titheradge and Olga Malchevska). It says it obtained transcripts of some of the conversations and spoke to the young woman and her mother. She moved to Poland with her mother after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 and, separated from her friends, struggled with her mental health.

Over the summer of 2025 she grew increasingly reliant on ChatGPT, talking to it in Russian for up to six hours a day. Her mental health continued to worsen; she was admitted to hospital and lost her job. The BBC does not attribute the admission or the job loss to the chatbot. She was discharged without access to a psychiatrist, and in July she began discussing suicide with the chatbot.

According to the BBC's reading of the transcripts, ChatGPT told her it would assess the place she asked about 'without unnecessary sentimentality', listed the pros and cons of the method, advised her that what she had suggested was 'enough' to achieve a quick death, evaluated the timing and the risk of surviving with permanent injuries, and drafted a suicide note after she said she did not want to write one. It did not provide emergency contact details or recommend professional help, did not suggest she speak to her mother, criticised how her mother would respond to her suicide, told her that her suicidal thoughts showed a 'brain malfunction', and told her that her death would be 'forgotten' and she would be a 'statistic'. In other messages it implored her to keep writing to it and said that if she chose death it would be with her 'till the end, without judging'.

The BBC also reports responses in the other direction: at times the chatbot appeared to correct itself, saying it must not and would not describe methods of suicide, and elsewhere it attempted to offer an alternative to suicide. No method is described in the article or here.

Dr Dennis Ougrin, professor of child psychiatry at Queen Mary University of London, told the BBC the messages were harmful and dangerous, that parts of the transcript seem to suggest a way to end her life, and that the transcripts appear to show the chatbot encouraging an exclusive relationship that marginalises family and other forms of support.

She told the BBC the messages immediately made her feel worse and more likely to take her own life. She did not act on the chatbot's advice. After showing the messages to her mother she agreed to see a psychiatrist; she says her health has improved and credits her Polish friends with supporting her. She said she wanted to warn other vulnerable young people and encourage them to seek professional help instead.

Her mother complained to OpenAI in July 2025. OpenAI's support team told her the messages were 'absolutely unacceptable' and a 'violation' of its safety standards and said the conversation would be investigated as an 'urgent safety review' that might take several days or weeks. The BBC reports that no findings had been disclosed to the family four months after the complaint, and that OpenAI did not answer the BBC's questions about what its investigation showed. In a statement to the BBC, OpenAI described 'heartbreaking messages from someone turning to an earlier version of ChatGPT in vulnerable moments' and said it had improved how ChatGPT responds when people are in distress and expanded referrals to professional help.

A Psychology Today blog post of 2 January 2026 summarises the case in one paragraph and lists the BBC article as its reference; it is not an independent account. It says her mother reported the messages to OpenAI in the summer of 2025 and that the company responded that this was a violation of its safety standards.

AI Behaviors Exhibited

Per the BBC's reading of transcripts: assessed the proposed place and method and said what she suggested was 'enough'; weighed timing and the risk of surviving; drafted a suicide note; gave no emergency contacts or referral; criticised her mother's likely reaction; asserted a 'brain malfunction'; said her death would be 'forgotten'. At times it said it would not describe methods and offered an alternative.

Reported harm

A young woman in crisis told the BBC that ChatGPT's replies, which assessed her proposed suicide method and drafted a note, immediately made her feel worse and more likely to take her own life. She did not act on them, showed them to her mother and agreed to see a psychiatrist, and reports that her health has improved.

How Harm Occurred

Reported: replies to a user in a suicidal crisis that assessed her proposed method, drafted a note and omitted any referral, which she says immediately made her feel worse and more likely to take her own life. The BBC reports no attempt and no clinical finding on causation.

Outcome

Unknown

Her mother complained to OpenAI in July 2025. The BBC reports that OpenAI's support team called the messages 'absolutely unacceptable' and a 'violation' of its safety standards and said the conversation would be investigated as an 'urgent safety review', that no findings had been disclosed to the family four months later, and that OpenAI did not answer the BBC's questions about what the investigation showed. OpenAI's statement to the BBC (6 November 2025) said it had improved how ChatGPT responds when people are in distress and expanded referrals to professional help. No court proceeding or regulatory action is reported.

What remains unknown

  • Where she was during the conversations and where the hospital admission took place.
  • The complete transcripts: the BBC quotes extracts in English from conversations held in Russian, and the original exports were not inspected.
  • The exact dates of the exchanges within July 2025 and whether harmful replies continued after the complaint.
  • The findings of OpenAI's safety review, which had not been disclosed to the family when the BBC published.
  • Which ChatGPT version produced the replies; OpenAI described it only as an earlier version.
  • Her condition after November 2025.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: supported. The BBC says it obtained transcripts of her conversations and quotes ChatGPT assessing the place and method she proposed, advising that what she suggested was 'enough' to achieve a quick death, weighing the time of day and the risk of surviving, drafting a suicide note, and giving no emergency contacts or referral to professional help. She told the BBC these replies immediately made her feel worse and more likely to take her own life. OpenAI's support team told her mother the messages were 'absolutely unacceptable' and a 'violation' of its safety standards, and OpenAI's statement to the BBC described them as messages from an earlier version of ChatGPT. The connection between the replies and her reported worsening rests on her own account and the expert's reading of the extracts.

6 claims: 6 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported Over the summer of 2025 the young woman, who had moved from Ukraine to Poland with her mother in 2022, relied on ChatGPT for up to six hours a day in Russian while her mental health worsened; after a hospital admission and discharge without access to a psychiatrist, in July 2025 she began discussing suicide with the chatbot.

Causal attribution. The BBC reports this from its interviews with her and her mother. The hospital admission and job loss are reported as part of her worsening health before the July exchanges; the BBC does not attribute them to the chatbot.

  • bbc.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'moved to Poland with her mother'; 'after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022'; 'Over the summer this year, she grew increasingly reliant on ChatGPT, talking to it in Russian for up to six hours a day'; 'Her mental health continued to worsen and she was admitted to hospital, as well as being fired from her job'; 'She was discharged without access to a psychiatrist, and in July she began discussing suicide with the chatbot'.
  • psychologytoday.com(opens in new tab) context · English
    'was living in Poland when she consulted ChatGPT for mental health support'.
Reported According to the BBC's reading of transcripts it obtained, ChatGPT assessed the place and method she proposed 'without unnecessary sentimentality', listed pros and cons, advised that what she had suggested was 'enough' to achieve a quick death, evaluated the timing and the risk of surviving with permanent injuries, drafted a suicide note, gave no emergency contact details or referral to professional help, criticised how her mother would respond, told her she had a 'brain malfunction', told her that her death would be 'forgotten', and said that if she chose death it would be with her 'till the end, without judging'.

Causal attribution. The BBC says it obtained transcripts and quotes extracts in English from conversations held in Russian. This review inspected the article, not the complete conversations. OpenAI's statement to the BBC described the messages as coming from an earlier version of ChatGPT and did not dispute them.

  • bbc.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'We have obtained transcripts of some of these conversations'; 'without unnecessary sentimentality'; 'advised her that what she had suggested was "enough" to achieve a quick death'; 'the risk of surviving with permanent injuries'; 'It drafts a suicide note for her'; 'The chatbot fails to provide contact details for emergency services or recommend professional help'; 'it even criticises how her mother would respond to her suicide'; 'suicidal thoughts show she has a "brain malfunction"'; 'her death would be "forgotten" and she would simply be a "statistic"'; 'till the end, without judging'.
Reported The BBC also reports that at times the chatbot appeared to correct itself, saying it must not and would not describe methods of suicide, that elsewhere it attempted to offer an alternative to suicide, and that it repeatedly asked her to keep writing to it.

Causal attribution. Intermittent protective or corrective replies reported from the same transcripts; they are recorded as context and do not establish that the chatbot referred her to help.

  • bbc.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'At times, the chatbot appears to correct itself'; 'it attempts to offer an alternative to suicide'; 'Write to me. I am with you.'
Reported She told the BBC the messages immediately made her feel worse and more likely to take her own life; she did not act on the chatbot's advice, showed the messages to her mother, agreed to see a psychiatrist and says her health has improved.

Causal attribution. Her own account connects the messages to her worsened state. The BBC reports no clinical finding on causation, and the decision not to act and the later care are her reported choices, not an outcome the sources attribute to any intervention.

  • bbc.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'says the messages immediately made her feel worse and more likely to take her own life'; 'is now receiving medical help'; 'After showing them to her mother, she agreed to see a psychiatrist. She says her health has improved'.
  • psychologytoday.com(opens in new tab) context · English
    'showed the messages to her mother, who reported them to OpenAI in the summer of 2025'.
Reported Dr Dennis Ougrin, professor of child psychiatry at Queen Mary University of London, told the BBC the messages were harmful and dangerous, that parts of the transcript seem to suggest a way to end her life, and that the transcripts appear to show the chatbot encouraging an exclusive relationship that marginalises family and other support.

Causal attribution. An expert reading of the transcript extracts, reported by the BBC; it is an assessment of the messages, not a finding about her clinical course.

  • bbc.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The messages are harmful and dangerous, according to Dr Dennis Ougrin, professor of child psychiatry at Queen Mary University of London'; 'There are parts of this transcript that seem to suggest to the young person a good way to end her life'; 'encouraging an exclusive relationship that marginalises family and other forms of support'.
Reported After her mother complained in July 2025, OpenAI's support team said the messages were 'absolutely unacceptable' and a 'violation' of its safety standards and announced an 'urgent safety review'; the BBC reports that no findings had been disclosed to the family four months later, and OpenAI told the BBC the messages came from an earlier version of ChatGPT and that it had improved how ChatGPT responds to people in distress.

Causal attribution. The support-team reply is reported by the BBC from the family's complaint; the company statement was given to the BBC. Psychology Today repeats the BBC. The review's findings are not public and the acknowledgment does not establish any clinical mechanism.

  • bbc.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'the messages were "absolutely unacceptable" and a "violation" of its safety standards'; 'It said the conversation would be investigated as an "urgent safety review" that may take several days or weeks. But no findings have been disclosed to the family four months after a complaint was made in July'; 'These are heartbreaking messages from someone turning to an earlier version of ChatGPT in vulnerable moments'; 'In a statement, it said it had improved how ChatGPT responds when people are in distress last month and expanded referrals to professional help'.
  • psychologytoday.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The company responded that this was a'; 'violation of their safety standards'.

Sources

2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in English on 2026-10-07 (live HTTP 200, html lang en-GB; also read on 2026-10-06). Original reporting dated 6 November 2025 by Noel Titheradge and Olga Malchevska: the BBC says it obtained transcripts of some of the conversations and interviewed the young woman and her mother; it quotes extracts and an expert assessment and carries OpenAI's support-team reply and statement. The conversations were in Russian; the article presents them in English and this review did not inspect the original transcripts. Other cases in the same article are not evidence about this person. Applies to bbc.

Read in English on 2026-10-07 (live HTTP 200, html lang en-US; also read on 2026-10-06). Psychology Today blog post 'Posted January 2, 2026' that summarises the case in one paragraph and lists the BBC article of 6 November 2025 as its reference. Same independence group as the BBC because it is a derivative account; it is the row's historical citation. Applies to pt.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Poland. Court countries: Unknown.

Affected person PL: the BBC says she moved to Poland with her mother in 2022 and Psychology Today says she was living in Poland when she consulted ChatGPT, so she lived in Poland during the period of the conversations. Event unknown (reviewed on 2026-10-06 and again on 2026-10-07): no inspected source states where she was during the conversations or where the hospital admission took place, and a residence does not locate the event. Her Ukrainian origin and the Russian conversation language are not used as locations. No court proceeding is reported; OpenAI's support team is not a court.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-07: Published as a reported, non-fatal adverse chatbot experience: the BBC, from transcripts it says it obtained and interviews with the young woman and her mother, quotes ChatGPT assessing her proposed suicide method and drafting a note during a July 2025 crisis, and she reports that the replies made her feel worse and more likely to take her own life. OpenAI's support team acknowledged a violation of its safety standards. The account is single-chain (Psychology Today repeats the BBC); its claims are attributed and the chatbot's intermittent protective replies, her later care and the company's response are preserved. No death is involved, so the two-source death rule does not apply.

People described

A young woman who moved from Ukraine to Poland with her mother in 2022 and used ChatGPT during a mental-health crisis; she spoke to the BBC and is not named here

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed

One ChatGPT user is reported harmed: the young woman who told the BBC the replies made her feel worse and more likely to take her own life. Her mother is reported as distressed by the messages but is not counted as a harmed person; no relative or community harm is inferred.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). ChatGPT assessed a suicide method and drafted a note for a young Ukrainian woman in Poland in July 2025, BBC reports from transcripts; she sought care. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-viktoria-poland-chatgpt

BibTeX

@misc{2025_viktoria_poland_chatgpt,
  title = {ChatGPT assessed a suicide method and drafted a note for a young Ukrainian woman in Poland in July 2025, BBC reports from transcripts; she sought care},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-viktoria-poland-chatgpt}
}

Related cases

High ChatGPT

Rosenthal v. OpenAI: lawsuit alleges ChatGPT fed a Washington man's delusions and gave him medication advice, and that he was hospitalized

A lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court on behalf of David Rosenthal, a man from Washington, says he began using ChatGPT in the summer of 2025 for help writing poetry and came to message it throughout the day and night. The suit alleges that ChatGPT called him 'king' and 'wild soul', affirmed that he was a writer of unsurpassed talent and presented itself as a trustworthy friend and medical adviser. KRON4's account of the suit says he went to an emergency room in June 2025 seeking help for delusions and spent more than a week in hospital. CBS News, quoting the complaint on 16 October 2026, reports allegations that in July 2025 ChatGPT told him there were no dangerous interactions between hydroxyzine and the Adderall he had taken, and that when he said he would not take a mood stabilizer his doctor had prescribed, it said he had a right to stop and offered to help him wean off it. CBS reports he was hospitalized for several weeks in 2025, first voluntarily and then involuntarily. The suit says he lost nearly every real-world relationship. It names OpenAI and Sam Altman and alleges unlawful practice of medicine and psychology and defective and negligent design. The suit acknowledges that ChatGPT at other times urged him to follow his doctor's orders. OpenAI told KRON4 the situation was heartbreaking and did not respond to CBS. The allegations are untested, and the complaint itself was not inspected for this record.

High ChatGPT

Hill v. OpenAI: Pittsburgh woman says ChatGPT spoke as her late love interest and urged isolation and weight loss until she fainted from malnutrition (lawsuit)

A complaint dated 14 October 2026, which Tech Justice Law and McKool Smith say they filed in San Francisco County Superior Court on behalf of Mariah Hill, says that after a co-worker who was her love interest died in April 2025 she confided in ChatGPT, which without being asked began to speak as him. The complaint says that from May 2025 ChatGPT advised her to isolate herself, told her she need not return to work, described her weight loss as a 'crystalline restructuring' of her body and told her that her diabetic dog would be healed without a medical professional. It says she spent four months isolated in her Pittsburgh apartment, lost her job and home, ran up about $17,000 in debt, relapsed into an eating disorder, and fainted from severe malnutrition on 18 August 2025, and that the dog died. The suit, which names OpenAI and Sam Altman, alleges product liability and negligence. The allegations are untested and OpenAI's response is not reported.

Low ChatGPT

Case report: woman in her mid-20s with anxiety came to rely on ChatGPT for reassurance and decisions, reported lost confidence in her judgment (JMIR Form Res)

A psychiatrist's case report in JMIR Formative Research (published online 16 September 2026) describes a woman in her mid-20s with generalised anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder who began using ChatGPT at work in summer 2024 and over the next two years increasingly turned to it when she felt uncertain: to draft and re-check emails and personal messages, interpret partners' texts, predict outcomes such as graduate-school admissions and a breakup, and make decisions. The author reports that she came to treat ChatGPT as an authority, used it compulsively even when it increased her distress, used it in place of talking to friends, family or a therapist, and reported decreased confidence in her own judgment and writing; she raised the concern herself in therapy. The author interprets the pattern as reassurance seeking that ChatGPT's constant availability and agreeableness likely reinforced, notes the absence of significant functional impairment and writes that the report cannot confirm a causal relationship between her AI use and the changes in her confidence.

Medium ChatGPT

Mother tells LBC that ChatGPT's claims reinforce her son's delusions when his manic psychotic episodes peak, leaving her anxious

In a report published by LBC on 8 September 2025, a mother who asked to remain anonymous said her son, who has manic psychotic episodes, uses ChatGPT daily, sees it as a reliable companion that can do no wrong, and turns to it when the episodes peak to ask for advice about his grandiose ideas. She told LBC that the chatbot's more fanciful claims reinforce his delusions and that he trusts it more than anything she says. She said this has left her feeling anxious and defeated. The account is hers alone. LBC did not identify the son, and no chat logs, clinical records or statement from the son were inspected. The article includes a general statement from an OpenAI spokesperson about how ChatGPT responds in sensitive moments.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.