Skip to main content
High reported severity Media Coverage

Jacksonville, Florida: a 38-year-old father was arrested at work in May 2025 and charged with soliciting a child after sheriff's investigators identified him, he says with facial-recognition tools, from photos an impostor had sent to an undercover officer; charges were dropped in August 2025 after the real sender confessed, and the family says the ordeal cost $45,000

The Florida Trib (28 September 2026, republished by the Florida Phoenix) reports that in May 2025, during the multi-agency sting Operation Rescue Our Children, a man using the Skout dating app sent an undercover officer posing as a 13-year-old girl two photos of someone else: a former friend, a supermarket assistant manager and father of two whom the Trib calls 'Nick'. Investigators told him they relied on facial-recognition tools to identify him in the pictures, he recalled, and the Trib found no indication in court documents of other investigative work before his arrest. He was handcuffed at work, charged with soliciting a child via computer and unlawful use of a two-way communications device, spent a night in jail, wore an ankle monitor, was barred from contact with his two young children for a month and a half and could not live at home for nearly three months. The account's owner, a man with a prior conviction for the same offence, admitted on 31 July 2025 using the photos; charges against the father were dropped the next day and a judge ordered the case expunged on 4 August 2025, though the records stayed publicly online for more than a year. The family says the ordeal cost $45,000 in lost wages and legal fees and traumatised the children. The sheriff's office did not respond to the Trib's questions.

AI system
Unidentified facial recognition system
Occurred
May 2025
Reported
28 September 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Made a claim about the person
Reported harm
Loss of LibertyLegal HarmFinancial LossRelationship DisruptionPsychological DistressReputational HarmProfessional Harm
Whose AI use
An institution’s AI use
Setting
Justice · Relationships · Finance · Work
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source
4 claims: 4 reported. 3 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 3 people

AI system as recorded: Facial-recognition search tools used by Jacksonville Sheriff's Office investigators to identify the man in photos sent during the sting (per his recollection of what investigators told him); the Trib notes that Jacksonville and other Florida agencies use the FACESNXT system maintained by the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, but does not state which tool was run in this case

What Happened

The Florida Trib investigation by Kate Payne (28 September 2026; republished by the Florida Phoenix) is based on court records, police reports and interviews with the man and his wife. On 14 May 2025, according to court records, a man logged on to the Skout dating app and messaged an undercover officer posing as a 13-year-old girl during Operation Rescue Our Children, sending two photos of a dark-haired man that did not match his own profile picture. Investigators ran a search on the photos, which led them to 'Nick', who was arrested six days after the online conversation ended. Nick recalls investigators telling him they relied on facial-recognition tools to identify him; the Trib found no indication in the court documents of any other investigative work before the arrest beyond verifying that he was the person in the photos, and no evidence that investigators sought phone data or account information first. He was handcuffed at work in front of customers and co-workers and charged with soliciting a child via computer and unlawful use of a two-way communications device (third-degree felonies). In interrogation he pointed out that the account's profile photo showed a former friend who had been arrested for the same offence years earlier. He spent a night in jail, was bailed out by his wife, wore a court-ordered ankle monitor at $105 a week, was barred from any contact with his two children (the younger seven months old) for a month and a half and lived with his mother-in-law for nearly three months; he was suspended from his job and the couple could not pay rent. The day after the arrest investigators subpoenaed the account information, which showed it belonged to the former friend. That man confessed on 31 July 2025 that he had used photos of former friends because they were better looking than him; prosecutors dropped the charges against Nick the next day, and a judge ordered the case expunged on 4 August 2025. The records, including his home address and phone number, stayed on the Duval County Clerk of Courts website for more than a year. The family puts the cost at $45,000 in lost wages and legal fees; his wife says their older daughter still becomes anxious when he is late. A George Washington University law professor who reviewed the records at the Trib's request called it a bad policing story, not a bad technology story. The sheriff's office did not respond; Sheriff T.K. Waters has previously said a facial-recognition hit alone is not probable cause.

Reported harm

The man was arrested, jailed overnight, charged with child-sex offences, monitored and separated from his children for weeks; he and his wife told The Florida Trib the ordeal cost $45,000 in lost wages and legal fees and traumatised their children.

Outcome

Resolved

Prosecutors dropped the charges on 1 August 2025, and on 4 August 2025 a judge ordered the case expunged because the arrest was made 'contrary to law or by mistake'; the Duval County Clerk of Courts left the records publicly available for more than a year, removing them only after The Florida Trib asked. The actual sender pleaded guilty in 2026 and was sentenced to 40 months in prison. The couple were told the lead detective was placed on administrative leave pending termination; the Trib found she had applied for a deferred retirement programme. No lawsuit is reported; the sheriff's office did not respond to questions.

What remains unknown

  • Which facial-recognition system was used and what match result it returned.
  • Whether the sheriff's office has reviewed the arrest or disciplined anyone (the Trib reports the lead detective applied for deferred retirement).
  • Whether the man will bring a legal claim.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The man recalls that investigators told him they relied on facial-recognition tools to identify him in the photos, and the Trib reports that investigators ran a search on the photos that led them to him. The Trib names FACESNXT as the system Jacksonville investigators use but does not establish that it was the tool run here. The decisions to seek a warrant and arrest without further investigation were the officers', prosecutors' and a judge's. The Trib's headline and narrative state in its own voice that officers relied on 'artificial intelligence-powered facial recognition tools'; the only sourcing it gives for that link is his recollection, and it cites no facial-recognition result from the court records.

4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported After a man on the Skout app sent two photos of a former friend to an undercover officer posing as a 13-year-old during Operation Rescue Our Children in May 2025, Jacksonville Sheriff's Office investigators ran a search on the photos that led them to the friend, a 38-year-old supermarket assistant manager, and arrested him at work six days after the conversation ended; he recalls being told investigators relied on facial-recognition tools to identify him.

Causal attribution. The Trib's investigation from court records and the man's recollection; the sheriff's office did not respond. The Trib's expert source attributes the arrest chiefly to inadequate policing.

  • floridatrib.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'When investigators ran a search on the photos of the man with dark brown hair, it led them to'; 'Investigators told Nick they relied on facial recognition tools to identify him in the pictures, he recalled.'; 'The officers walked over to the man and told him to place his hands behind his back, slapping him in cuffs in front of customers and coworkers.'; 'An investigation by The Trib reveals the 38-year-old was arrested'; 'On May 14, 2025, court records show that'; 'logged on to the Skout online dating app with the username'; 'Nick’s arrest came in conjunction with a multi-agency sting called Operation Rescue Our Children'
Reported The Trib found no indication in the court documents of any investigative work before the arrest beyond verifying that he was the person in the photos; it reports that court records show investigators subpoenaed the account information the day after the arrest, and that the information showed the account belonged to another man.

Causal attribution. The Trib's reading of court records; the records themselves were not read.

  • floridatrib.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'There is no indication in the court documents that officers carried out any other investigative work before arresting Nick, beyond verifying that he was the person in the photos'; 'Court records show that the day after Nick’s arrest, investigators issued the first of a string of subpoenas for account information behind the suspect’s online profile'
Reported He spent a night in jail, was barred by a judge from any contact with his two children for a month and a half, could not live at home for nearly three months, wore a court-ordered ankle monitor and was suspended from his job; the family says the ordeal cost $45,000 in lost wages and legal fees and traumatised the children.

Causal attribution. The family's account to the Trib.

  • floridatrib.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'costing them $45,000 in lost wages and legal fees and traumatizing his kids.'; 'A judge barred him from having any contact with the children for a month and a half'; 'And for nearly three months, he wasn’t able to reside at his family’s home'; 'The $105 a week for the court-ordered ankle monitor that tracked his every move.'; 'Forced to spend the night in jail'; 'The rent they couldn’t pay while Nick was suspended from his job.'
Reported The account's owner confessed on 31 July 2025 to using photos of former friends; prosecutors dropped the charges the next day and on 4 August 2025 a judge ordered the case expunged, but the records remained publicly available on the Duval County clerk's website for more than a year.

Causal attribution. Court records as reported by the Trib; the clerk's office acknowledged the failure to expunge.

  • floridatrib.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'at his home on July 31, 2025, and he confessed to propositioning someone he thought was a young girl'; 'But the next day, prosecutors finally dropped the charges against Nick. On Aug. 4, 2025, a judge ordered Nick’s case expunged because the arrest was made “contrary to law or by mistake.”'; 'remained publicly available on the Duval courts website for more than a year after the judge ordered the records expunged.'; 'admitted to using photos of other people'

Sources

1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read live on 2026-09-29 in full (The Florida Trib, 28 September 2026, investigation by Kate Payne based on court records and interviews). Republished by the Florida Phoenix, which returned HTTP 403 and was not read. Applies to s1.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.

The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office arrested the man at a Jacksonville supermarket; the case was in Duval County, Florida (The Florida Trib).

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: Published as a contextual case consistent with the existing facial-recognition wrongful-arrest rows: investigators identified a man through a search of photos an impostor sent in a sting, which he recalls being told used facial-recognition tools, and arrested him without further checks. The account rests on one investigative report drawing on court records and interviews; the sheriff's office did not respond. The man is pseudonymous in the source and his family is not named here.

People described

A 38-year-old Jacksonville supermarket assistant manager and father of two young children (called 'Nick' by The Florida Trib, which withheld his full name), and his family

People reported harmed in this case

At least 3 people

0 AI participants · 3 other people harmed

The arrested man and his two young children, whom the Trib reports were traumatised and separated from him (The Florida Trib). His wife describes her own distress and the financial burden; she is not added separately. Documented minimum 3.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Jacksonville, Florida: a 38-year-old father was arrested at work in May 2025 and charged with soliciting a child after sheriff's investigators identified him, he says with facial-recognition tools, from photos an impostor had sent to an undercover officer; charges were dropped in August 2025 after the real sender confessed, and the family says the ordeal cost $45,000. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-jacksonville-sheriff-facial-recognition-wrongful-arrest-father-operation-rescue-our-children

BibTeX

@misc{2025_jacksonville_sheriff_facial_recognition_wrongful_arrest_father_operation_rescue_our_children,
  title = {Jacksonville, Florida: a 38-year-old father was arrested at work in May 2025 and charged with soliciting a child after sheriff's investigators identified him, he says with facial-recognition tools, from photos an impostor had sent to an undercover officer; charges were dropped in August 2025 after the real sender confessed, and the family says the ordeal cost \$45,000},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-jacksonville-sheriff-facial-recognition-wrongful-arrest-father-operation-rescue-our-children}
}

Related cases

High Unidentified facial recognition system

Phoenix: facial recognition match put Javier Lorenzano Nunez in jail for nearly a year for a 1998 murder; charges dismissed, federal suit filed

Javier Lorenzano Nunez was arrested in October 2024 for the 1998 murder of Sarah Carr after investigators ran the old suspect's MVD photo through facial recognition databases, got 250 possible matches and zeroed in on him — with Phoenix police publicizing the arrest in a press release and a special video. Charges were dismissed without prejudice in August 2025 after forensic evidence, including DNA and fingerprints, excluded him. His lawsuit alleges Phoenix police knew from a 2017 fingerprint analysis that his prints did not match, and ignored a 2007 Puerto Rico lead on the original suspect with the same name, date of birth and social security number. He spent nearly a year in jail. The federal suit against the Phoenix Police Department and the Maricopa County Attorney's Office alleges gross negligence, false arrest, false imprisonment and defamation.

High Unidentified facial recognition system

Maryland/Oklahoma: Kimberlee Williams, an Oklahoma woman who says she had never been to Maryland, was arrested in June 2021 and jailed about six months on bank-fraud charges in three Maryland counties after a facial-recognition search by an unknown CrimeDex respondent named her; all charges were dismissed by December 2021 and the ACLU filed complaints in April 2026

According to police and bank records reviewed by the Washington Post, in December 2019 a woman made fraudulent withdrawals at a SunTrust branch in Potomac, Maryland; branches in two other Maryland counties were also defrauded. A bank investigator posted the surveillance photos on CrimeDex, an online network of police and corporate investigators; an unknown respondent ran the image through facial-recognition software and returned Kimberlee Williams's name and photo, and the investigator told Montgomery County police that facial-recognition software had identified her. Police in Montgomery, Prince George's and Anne Arundel counties charged her in 2020 on the investigator's identification and their own visual comparison of photos (two departments also cited her old Oklahoma check-fraud convictions), without reported checks of her whereabouts; Montgomery County police did not disclose the facial-recognition search in the charging application, according to police records reviewed by the Washington Post and the ACLU. On 23 June 2021 she was arrested at the gate of Fort Sill near Lawton, Oklahoma, while accompanying her daughter on a DoorDash delivery, spent about three weeks in an Oklahoma jail, was flown to Maryland, and faced 16 charges including 12 felonies. The counties dismissed the charges one after another, in October and December 2021, after about six months in jail. Her daughter says she was depressed afterwards; the ACLU says the ordeal harmed her mental and physical health. On 14 April 2026 the ACLU and ACLU of Maryland sent complaint letters to the three departments seeking an apology and reforms.

Medium Unidentified facial recognition system

New York: man misidentified through facial recognition in an indecent exposure case arrested and jailed two days

Reporting from August 2025 says an NYPD facial recognition search of images from a February 2025 indecent exposure in Manhattan's Union Square produced a possible match to a man who did not fit the described suspect. The man was placed in a photo lineup, arrested in April 2025 and jailed for two days. Prosecutors dismissed the case in July 2025 after his public defenders showed he was misidentified. The man says the process of becoming a correctional officer 'kind of' froze after the arrest. The NYPD says it never arrests solely on a facial recognition match.

Medium Pangram AI-text detector

US and UK: Hachette cancels the US edition of the novel Shy Girl and discontinues the UK edition after allegations it was AI-generated, with the author denying personal use of AI

On 19 March 2026 Hachette Book Group said it had cancelled the US publication of the horror novel Shy Girl by Mia Ballard (Orbit imprint) and would not continue the UK edition (Wildfire imprint, first released in November 2025). Reports say the decision followed an investigation by Hachette and came a day after the New York Times asked the publisher about online allegations that the text was largely AI-generated. The allegations came from readers on Goodreads, Reddit and YouTube and from AI-detector results, including a 78.4 percent AI-generated score on the Pangram detector that a publishing consultant says two other services confirmed. Ballard denied personally using AI in emails to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, and told the New York Times that an acquaintance hired to edit the original self-published version used AI. Ballard wrote that "my name is ruined" and "my mental health is at an all time low", and said legal action was being pursued. Hachette’s public statements cite its commitment to original creative expression. The sources inspected do not report what its investigation found. Whether AI generated any of the text, and who used it, is unresolved.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.