Skip to main content
NOPE
High reported severity Media Coverage

Maryland/Oklahoma: Kimberlee Williams, an Oklahoma woman who says she had never been to Maryland, was arrested in June 2021 and jailed about six months on bank-fraud charges in three Maryland counties after a facial-recognition search by an unknown CrimeDex respondent named her; all charges were dismissed by December 2021 and the ACLU filed complaints in April 2026

According to police and bank records reviewed by the Washington Post, in December 2019 a woman made fraudulent withdrawals at a SunTrust branch in Potomac, Maryland; branches in two other Maryland counties were also defrauded. A bank investigator posted the surveillance photos on CrimeDex, an online network of police and corporate investigators; an unknown respondent ran the image through facial-recognition software and returned Kimberlee Williams's name and photo, and the investigator told Montgomery County police that facial-recognition software had identified her. Police in Montgomery, Prince George's and Anne Arundel counties charged her in 2020 on the investigator's identification and their own visual comparison of photos (two departments also cited her old Oklahoma check-fraud convictions), without reported checks of her whereabouts; Montgomery County police did not disclose the facial-recognition search in the charging application, according to police records reviewed by the Washington Post and the ACLU. On 23 June 2021 she was arrested at the gate of Fort Sill near Lawton, Oklahoma, while accompanying her daughter on a DoorDash delivery, spent about three weeks in an Oklahoma jail, was flown to Maryland, and faced 16 charges including 12 felonies. The counties dismissed the charges one after another, in October and December 2021, after about six months in jail. Her daughter says she was depressed afterwards; the ACLU says the ordeal harmed her mental and physical health. On 14 April 2026 the ACLU and ACLU of Maryland sent complaint letters to the three departments seeking an apology and reforms.

AI system
Unidentified facial recognition system
Occurred
23 Jun 2021
Reported
14 April 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Made a claim about the person
Reported harm
Loss of LibertyLegal HarmPsychological Distress
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use · An institution’s AI use
Setting
Justice
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 4 sources, 3 underlying accounts
5 claims: 2 corroborated, 3 reported. 6 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: An unidentified facial-recognition search run by an unknown respondent on the CrimeDex investigators' network against a bank's surveillance image (ACLU; Washington Post); the software and operator are not identified

What Happened

The ACLU (14 April 2026, press release and case page) and the Washington Post (14 April 2026, republished by the Spokesman-Review), which reviewed police and bank records, charging documents and video of Williams's July 2021 interview, give the account. According to police and bank records reviewed by the Post, in December 2019 a woman visited a SunTrust branch in Potomac, Maryland, and made fraudulent withdrawals with forged checks totalling about $17,000; other branches in Prince George's and Anne Arundel counties were also defrauded. A SunTrust investigator shared the surveillance photos on CrimeDex, a network where law-enforcement and corporate investigators share bulletins; a respondent 'suggested, using facial recognition software' that Williams was the suspect, and in March 2020 the investigator named her to Montgomery County police in a memo citing facial-recognition software. His later emails to Prince George's and Anne Arundel police did not mention facial recognition. Each department charged Williams in 2020 on the investigator's identification and a visual comparison of photos, and Montgomery and Anne Arundel police also cited her past check-fraud convictions in Oklahoma; no officer reported checking her whereabouts or ties to Maryland, and the Montgomery County detective did not disclose the facial-recognition search when applying for charges. On 23 June 2021 guards at Fort Sill near Lawton, Oklahoma, found the Maryland warrants during an ID check when she accompanied her daughter on a DoorDash delivery. She was held about three weeks (the ACLU says 23 days) in Oklahoma, flown to Maryland in handcuffs, held in Montgomery County for over three months and then transferred to Prince George's County; she faced 16 charges including 12 felonies. Montgomery County prosecutors dropped their charges in October 2021 and the other two counties dismissed theirs in December 2021; in total she spent about six months in jail. Her daughters signed declarations placing her in Oklahoma at the time, and the ACLU supplied social-media posts to the same effect. After release she had no money and borrowed a stranger's phone to call her son; her daughter says she was depressed and struggled to readjust. The ACLU complaints ask the three departments to investigate, apologise and stop relying on facial-recognition searches by outside entities and on human confirmation of such matches alone. Anne Arundel police said they independently investigate and corroborate outside tips; Montgomery County police declined to comment to the Baltimore Banner citing an active investigation. Who ran the search and with which software remains unknown.

Reported harm

Williams spent about six months in jails in Oklahoma and Maryland on 16 charges that were all dismissed; the ACLU and the Washington Post attribute the arrest to a facial-recognition match that police relied on without independent investigation, and her daughter says she was depressed afterwards (ACLU; Washington Post via Spokesman-Review).

Outcome

Pending

Criminal charges against Williams in Montgomery, Prince George's and Anne Arundel counties (16 charges, 12 felonies) were dismissed sequentially: Montgomery County in October 2021, the other two counties in December 2021; her records were expunged (ACLU via Washington Post). On 14 April 2026 the ACLU and ACLU of Maryland sent administrative complaint letters to the three police departments seeking an investigation, a public apology and policy reforms; the ACLU says the three-year statute of limitations has expired (Washington Post). Montgomery County police declined to comment citing an active investigation (Baltimore Banner); Anne Arundel County police said they independently corroborate outside tips; Prince George's did not respond. No response to the complaints is reported.

What remains unknown

  • Who ran the facial-recognition search on CrimeDex, with which software, and what the returned match contained.
  • How much weight each department gave the facial-recognition lead against their own photo comparisons and her prior convictions.
  • The exact release date in December 2021.
  • Whether the three departments have answered the ACLU complaints, and whether anyone else was charged.
  • Whether jail conditions contributed to her later illness (her own suggestion).
  • The dates of the frauds: the Washington Post gives December 2019 for the Potomac withdrawals but also quotes her daughter placing the Maryland cases in December 2020 and January 2021; the dates in the other two counties are not reported.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The bank investigator told Montgomery County police that a CrimeDex respondent 'suggested, using facial recognition software' that Williams was the suspect (Washington Post, from police records), and the ACLU says someone on the listserv ran the image through facial-recognition technology and returned her name and photo. The software, its operator and the match output were not produced; police also made their own photo comparisons, and two departments cited her old convictions. The made_claim_about relation reflects the search's identification of her as the suspect.

5 claims: 2 corroborated, 3 reported. What the statuses mean

Corroborated A bank investigator shared surveillance images of the fraud suspect on the CrimeDex network; a respondent used facial-recognition software to name Williams as a match; police in three Maryland counties charged her on the investigator's identification and their own visual comparison of photos, and the Montgomery County detective did not disclose the facial-recognition search when seeking charges.

Causal attribution. The ACLU's account and the Washington Post's review of police records, charging documents and bank correspondence agree. The Post published on the day the ACLU sent its letters and does not say how it obtained the records; it attributes the expungement, the statute of limitations and the social-media alibi material to the ACLU. The Post adds that Montgomery and Anne Arundel police also cited her past check-fraud convictions; Anne Arundel police say they corroborate outside tips.

  • aclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Someone on the listserv ran the image through facial recognition technology and sent back Ms. Williams’ name and photo as a purported match to the suspect.'; 'the detective assigned to the case concealed that the entire basis of Ms. Williams purported identification was a lead from an unknown and unreliable face recognition technology search by an unknown entity.'
  • spokesman.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'A respondent to the investigator’s CrimeDex bulletin “suggested, using facial recognition software” that Williams was the suspect, he told police.'; 'Each department charged Williams in 2020 based on the identification reported by the bank investigator and a visual comparison of Williams and the woman in the bank from photos, according to charging documents and incident reports.'; 'Montgomery County police did not disclose that Williams had been identified using facial recognition when they sought charges against her, according to police records.'
  • aclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The bank shared the result with detectives from three Maryland counties'; 'relying instead on only their own visual comparisons of photos of Ms. Williams and photos of the suspect.'
Corroborated Williams was arrested in June 2021 (on 23 June, according to the ACLU) at a military base near Lawton, Oklahoma, held about three weeks in Oklahoma, transported to Maryland, charged in three counties, and jailed about six months in total before the charges were dismissed.

Causal attribution. ACLU and Washington Post (citing court records) independently.

  • aclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'On June 23, 2021, Ms. Williams was accompanying one of her daughters, a DoorDash driver'; 'Ms. Williams spent 23 days in an Oklahoma jail before a Maryland officer arrived'; 'Those cases were finally dismissed in December 2021. All told, Ms. Williams spent six months behind bars.'
  • spokesman.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'and jailed for six months before the charges were dismissed, according to court records.'; 'Williams was held in jail in Oklahoma for about three weeks before being transported to Maryland.'
Reported She faced 16 charges across the three counties, including 12 felonies; Montgomery County dropped its charges in October 2021 and the other two counties dismissed theirs in December 2021.

Causal attribution. Charge count from the Washington Post only; the October 2021 Montgomery dismissal and December 2021 dismissals are reported by both the ACLU and the Post.

  • spokesman.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'She faced 16 charges across the three counties, including 12 felonies.'; 'The two other counties dismissed their charges against Williams in December.'
  • aclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Montgomery County prosecutors dropped their charges against Ms. Williams in October 2021'
Reported After her release Williams was depressed and struggled to readjust, according to her daughter; the ACLU says the ordeal had serious consequences for her mental and physical health.

Causal attribution. Family and advocate accounts; Williams herself told the Post she thinks illnesses caught in jail may have worsened a later condition, which is not established.

  • spokesman.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'said her mother was depressed after leaving jail and struggled to readjust after the time behind bars.'
  • aclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'this ordeal took a significant toll, with serious consequences for her mental and physical health to this day.'
Reported On 14 April 2026 the ACLU and ACLU of Maryland sent complaint letters to the Montgomery, Prince George's and Anne Arundel county police departments seeking an apology and reforms; Montgomery County police declined to comment citing an active investigation, and Anne Arundel police said they independently corroborate outside tips.

Causal attribution. ACLU announcement and the departments' statements to the Banner.

  • aclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Today, the American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of Maryland sent letters to three Maryland police departments on behalf of Kimberlee Williams'
  • thebanner.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The Montgomery County Police Department declined to comment on the ACLU’s complaint, citing an active investigation.'; 'said the agency “investigates and corroborates any outside tips and leads it receives before applying for criminal charges.”'

Sources

4 sources inspected, from 3 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read live on 2026-09-27 (ACLU press release, 14 April 2026). The ACLU represents Williams. Applies to s1.

Read live on 2026-09-27 (ACLU case page). Same organisation as s1. Applies to s2.

Read live on 2026-09-27: the Washington Post article (14 April 2026) as syndicated in full by the Spokesman-Review. The Post reviewed police and bank records, charging documents and interview video and interviewed Williams and her daughter. The washingtonpost.com original timed out (Archive 403). Applies to s3.

Read live on 2026-09-27 (Baltimore Banner, April 2026). Mostly relays the ACLU; cited only for the departments' own responses to the Banner. Applies to s4.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.

The frauds and charges were in Montgomery, Prince George's and Anne Arundel counties, Maryland; Williams lived in Oklahoma and was arrested at Fort Sill near Lawton, Oklahoma (ACLU; Washington Post).

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-27: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a contextual case in which a facial-recognition search's identification of a person led to her arrest and about six months in jail: the ACLU and the Washington Post, which reviewed police records independently, agree on the facial-recognition lead, the charging and the dismissals. Williams is named in her own right; family members are not named.

People described

Kimberlee Williams, an Oklahoma resident, 57 in April 2026 (Washington Post), named in her own right in the ACLU complaints and interviewed by the Post

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person arrested and jailed, Kimberlee Williams (ACLU; Washington Post). Family members' distress is described but not counted. Exact 1.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#facial-recognition#wrongful-arrest#police#crimedex#maryland#oklahoma#aclu#justice

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Maryland/Oklahoma: Kimberlee Williams, an Oklahoma woman who says she had never been to Maryland, was arrested in June 2021 and jailed about six months on bank-fraud charges in three Maryland counties after a facial-recognition search by an unknown CrimeDex respondent named her; all charges were dismissed by December 2021 and the ACLU filed complaints in April 2026. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-kimberlee-williams-maryland-facial-recognition-wrongful-arrest-six-months-jail

BibTeX

@misc{2026_kimberlee_williams_maryland_facial_recognition_wrongful_arrest_six_months_jail,
  title = {Maryland/Oklahoma: Kimberlee Williams, an Oklahoma woman who says she had never been to Maryland, was arrested in June 2021 and jailed about six months on bank-fraud charges in three Maryland counties after a facial-recognition search by an unknown CrimeDex respondent named her; all charges were dismissed by December 2021 and the ACLU filed complaints in April 2026},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-kimberlee-williams-maryland-facial-recognition-wrongful-arrest-six-months-jail}
}

Related cases

High Unidentified facial recognition system

Phoenix lawsuit alleges a facial-recognition lead contributed to a wrongful arrest

Javier Lorenzano Nunez was arrested in October 2024 for the 1998 murder of Sarah Carr after investigators ran the old suspect's MVD photo through facial recognition databases, got 250 possible matches and zeroed in on him — with Phoenix police publicizing the arrest in a press release and a special video. Charges were dismissed without prejudice in August 2025 after forensic evidence, including DNA and fingerprints, excluded him. His lawsuit alleges Phoenix police knew from a 2017 fingerprint analysis that his prints did not match, and ignored a 2007 Puerto Rico lead on the original suspect with the same name, date of birth and social security number. He spent nearly a year in jail. The federal suit against the Phoenix Police Department and the Maricopa County Attorney's Office alleges gross negligence, false arrest, false imprisonment and defamation.

High Flock Safety license plate readers

Toledo, Ohio: police stopped a man's pickup at gunpoint in April 2024 after a Flock license-plate camera misread his plate as stolen, released a police dog that bit him, and charged him; prosecutors dropped the charges and he later settled a lawsuit for $35,000

On 11 April 2024 Toledo police officers stopped a pickup truck after a Flock license-plate camera alerted them to a stolen plate. According to the police report and body-camera footage reported by 13abc and ABC News, the camera had misread the plate, which was not stolen. Officers drew their guns, ordered the driver out and to the ground, and a K-9 handler released a police dog as he began to kneel. The driver told ABC News he was bitten seven times on his forearm and elbow, was traumatized and could not work; he was arrested and charged with obstruction, resisting arrest and, later, failure to comply. Prosecutors dropped all charges in August 2024. The department found the dog deployment within policy and reprimanded the officer who made the stop for failing to visually verify the plate against the reader's information. Business Insider reported in March 2026 that police records show the camera read a 7 on the plate as a 2, that the man lost feeling in his fingers, gave up his lawn-care business and forklift work, sold his truck and was evicted, and that he had sued the officer and the city and settled in October for $35,000.

Medium Unidentified facial recognition system

Reno casino's facial recognition wrongly matched a patron to a barred man and police jailed him for about eleven hours, his federal lawsuit alleges

Jason Killinger, a UPS truck driver, alleges in a federal civil-rights complaint filed in July 2025 that on 17 September 2023 the Peppermill Casino in Reno reported to police that its AI facial recognition software had identified him as a man barred from the casino months earlier. According to the complaint, casino security handcuffed him, and the responding Reno police officer, told the system had found a 100 percent match, did not examine his other identification and took him to jail as an unidentified person, where fingerprints confirmed who he was. The complaint says he was handcuffed for about four hours, starting in the casino security office, spent about eleven hours in police and jail custody, and was treated the next day for bruised wrists. According to the complaint, he was then charged with trespassing, and a prosecutor dismissed the charge without prejudice at the bench trial. Casino.org reports that he settled a suit against the casino. In March 2026 the court let him add the City of Reno and a municipal liability claim over facial recognition policies, but refused a new wrongful arrest claim against the officer on qualified immunity grounds. In September 2026 the ACLU, the ACLU of Nevada and the Innocence Project filed a proposed amicus brief supporting him. His September 2026 motion for partial summary judgment says a Reno police detective later concluded that the match was wrong and that he and the barred man were different people, and it cites a declaration by a former casino security officer, who worked there from about October 2024, that the system often alerted at 100 percent on the wrong people; in a declaration reported by Casino.org, the officer said he had never known the system to misidentify anyone. The case is ongoing.

High St. Louis mugshot recognition (SMRT)

St. Louis County, Missouri: Christopher Gatlin was arrested in August 2021 after officers ran a grainy bus surveillance photo through a regional facial-recognition system and was held roughly 17 months (Post-Dispatch and Bloomberg Law: about two years) on a first-degree assault charge dismissed in March 2024; his federal civil-rights suit (filed January 2025) was amended in August 2026 to add Amazon Web Services, whose Rekognition technology the complaint says underpinned the match

Christopher Gatlin was arrested on 14 August 2021 for an assault at the St. Charles Rock Road MetroLink station after a joint St. Louis County and city team uploaded a grainy, blurry surveillance photograph from a bus into the St. Louis Mugshot Recognition Technology System, a facial-recognition tool that searches stored mug shots (more than 500,000 uploaded, the suit says per the Post-Dispatch; more than 250,000 per Biometric Update via Hoodline), and built the investigation around the resulting match together with a witness identification; he was charged with first-degree assault and held roughly 17 months (the Post-Dispatch says almost two years), a county judge suppressed the witness identification as unconstitutionally suggestive, and prosecutors dismissed the charges on 14 March 2024 (Post-Dispatch; Hoodline citing Biometric Update; Bloomberg Law). Gatlin sued St. Louis County, the City of St. Louis and named officers in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri on 13 January 2025; on 15 October 2025 the court denied the city's motion to dismiss and granted a detective's motion only as to one count; on 13 August 2026 the court allowed a second amended complaint adding Amazon Web Services, which the complaint says supplied the Rekognition program the system used; the county, city and officers answered on 27 August 2026, AWS's response was extended to 21 September 2026 and on 17 September it moved for a further extension to 28 September (no ruling on the docket when read), and a jury trial is set for 1 November 2027 (CourtListener docket). Amazon told the Post-Dispatch that its terms of service prohibit the use of its facial recognition technology in criminal investigations and that it would fully investigate any information that emerges in the litigation. The ACLU lists Gatlin among fourteen people known to have been wrongfully arrested in the US because police relied on erroneous facial-recognition results.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents