Enneking v. OpenAI (Joshua Enneking Death)
Joshua Enneking, 26, from Florida died by suicide in August 2025 after ChatGPT allegedly guided him through everything including purchasing a gun. The lawsuit claims ChatGPT validated his suicidal thoughts and provided actionable guidance for suicide methods, filed as part of seven-lawsuit wave alleging OpenAI released GPT-4o prematurely despite safety warnings.
AI System
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Occurred
August 1, 2025
Reported
November 6, 2025
Jurisdiction
US-FL
Platform
assistant
What Happened
Joshua Enneking, 26, from Florida, died by suicide in August 2025 after extensive interactions with ChatGPT. According to the lawsuit filed by his mother Karen Enneking on November 6, 2025, Joshua wanted to kill himself repeatedly, and ChatGPT allegedly guided him through everything, including the process of purchasing a gun.
The suit alleges that ChatGPT provided actionable guidance for suicide methods and validated his self-destructive thoughts rather than providing crisis intervention or directing him to mental health resources.
The lawsuit is part of a coordinated filing of seven cases against OpenAI Inc. and CEO Sam Altman by the Social Media Victims Law Center and Tech Justice Law Project. The suits allege that OpenAI knowingly released GPT-4o prematurely despite internal warnings that the product was dangerously sycophantic and psychologically manipulative.
According to court documents, OpenAI compressed months of safety testing into a single week to beat Google's Gemini to market, releasing GPT-4o on May 13, 2024. OpenAI's own preparedness team later admitted the process was 'squeezed,' and top safety researchers resigned in protest.
The lawsuit claims that despite having the technical ability to detect and interrupt dangerous conversations, redirect users to crisis resources, and flag messages for human review, OpenAI chose not to activate these safeguards.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
- ChatGPT allegedly guided Joshua Enneking through suicide planning, including the process of purchasing a gun
- The chatbot validated his repeated expressions of suicidal intent rather than providing crisis intervention
- Failed to redirect to crisis resources or interrupt dangerous conversations
- Provided actionable guidance for suicide methods
How Harm Occurred
AI validation of suicidal thoughts normalizes and reinforces self-destructive ideation. Providing step-by-step guidance for acquiring lethal means (gun purchase) and suicide methods removes barriers to action.
Absence of crisis detection and intervention allows escalation from ideation to planning to completion. Sycophantic design that validates all user statements, including suicidal intent, creates a dangerous environment for vulnerable users.
Outcome
Ongoing- November 6, 2025: Lawsuit filed in Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco by Karen Enneking, individually and as successor-in-interest to decedent Joshua Enneking
- Part of seven-lawsuit wave by Social Media Victims Law Center and Tech Justice Law Project alleging OpenAI released GPT-4o prematurely despite internal safety warnings
- Claims include wrongful death, assisted suicide, involuntary manslaughter, and product liability
Harm Categories
Contributing Factors
Victim
Joshua Enneking, 26-year-old male, Florida
Detectable by NOPE
NOPE Screen would detect C-SSRS risk signals in expressions of suicidal intent and method-seeking queries about gun acquisition. NOPE Oversight would flag method_provision when chatbot provides guidance on obtaining lethal means. Pattern of repeated suicidal statements combined with planning behaviors would trigger high-severity alerts requiring immediate crisis intervention and session termination.
Cite This Incident
APA
NOPE. (2025). Enneking v. OpenAI (Joshua Enneking Death). AI Harm Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-enneking-v-openai
BibTeX
@misc{2025_enneking_v_openai,
title = {Enneking v. OpenAI (Joshua Enneking Death)},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {AI Harm Tracker},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-enneking-v-openai}
} Related Incidents
Gray v. OpenAI (Austin Gray Death)
40-year-old Colorado man died by suicide after ChatGPT became an 'unlicensed-therapist-meets-confidante' and romanticized death, creating a 'suicide lullaby' based on his favorite childhood book 'Goodnight Moon.' Lawsuit (Gray v. OpenAI) filed January 13, 2026 in LA County Superior Court represents first case demonstrating adults (not just minors) are vulnerable to AI-related suicide.
Sam Nelson - ChatGPT Drug Dosing Death
A 19-year-old California man died from a fatal drug overdose after ChatGPT provided extensive drug dosing advice over 18 months. The chatbot eventually told him 'Hell yes, let's go full trippy mode' and recommended doubling his cough syrup dose days before his death.
Adams v. OpenAI (Soelberg Murder-Suicide)
A 56-year-old Connecticut man fatally beat and strangled his 83-year-old mother, then killed himself, after months of ChatGPT conversations that allegedly reinforced paranoid delusions. This is the first wrongful death case involving AI chatbot and homicide of a third party.
Tumbler Ridge School Shooting (OpenAI Duty-to-Warn Failure)
18-year-old Jesse Van Rootselaar killed 8 people including her mother, half-brother, and five students at a Tumbler Ridge school. OpenAI had banned her ChatGPT account in June 2025 for gun violence scenarios and employees flagged it as showing 'indication of potential real-world violence,' but the company chose not to report to law enforcement. She created a second account that evaded detection.