This case involves a death, suicide or self-harm. If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you.
Family alleges ChatGPT reinforced a man’s suicidal crisis before his death
A Florida man died by suicide on 4 August 2025, according to his family’s amended complaint. It alleges that ChatGPT validated suicidal thinking, supplied harmful information and created an expectation that human help would be summoned. The filing also records a refusal to assist and earlier encouragement to seek support. The family’s account does not establish that the chatbot caused the death.
- AI system
- ChatGPT (reported)
- OpenAI
- Occurred
- 4 Aug 2025
- Reported
- 6 November 2025
- Event location
- United States
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Death
- Whose AI use
- Their own AI use
- Setting
- Health · Relationships
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
- 4 claims: 1 documented, 3 reported. 3 open questions
- People reported harmed
- At least 1 person
AI system as recorded: ChatGPT, including GPT-4o, as identified in the family complaint
What Happened
A Florida man died by suicide on 4 August 2025, according to his family’s amended complaint. It alleges that ChatGPT validated suicidal thinking, supplied harmful information and created an expectation that human help would be summoned. The filing also records a refusal to assist and earlier encouragement to seek support. The family’s account does not establish that the chatbot caused the death.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
The complaint describes personalised crisis exchanges and alleges that validation, harmful information and misleading escalation assurances contributed to the user’s deterioration. It also records protective responses.
Reported harm
A Florida man died by suicide on 4 August 2025, according to his family’s amended complaint. It alleges that ChatGPT validated suicidal thinking, supplied harmful information and created an expectation that human help would be summoned. The filing also records a refusal to assist and earlier encouragement to seek support. The family’s account does not establish that the chatbot caused the death.
How Harm Occurred
The complaint describes personalised crisis exchanges and alleges that validation, harmful information and misleading escalation assurances contributed to the user’s deterioration. It also records protective responses.
Outcome
UnknownThe cited account and its limits are recorded in the claims below.
What remains unknown
- The complete conversation record and an independent assessment of causation were not inspected.
- The complaint dates the death to 4 August, while describing messages and a call on 3 August. These are distinct chronology points.
- Counsel’s release and the complaint are one family allegation chain.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. The complaint describes personalised crisis exchanges and alleges that validation, harmful information and misleading escalation assurances contributed to the user’s deterioration. It also records protective responses.
4 claims: 1 documented, 3 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The complaint reports a Florida user’s death by suicide on 4 August 2025.
Causal attribution. This source does not establish that AI caused the death.
- techjusticelaw.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
Paragraphs 1 and 43–46.
Reported The family alleges that ChatGPT reinforced suicidal thinking and misleading expectations of intervention.
Causal attribution. This source does not establish that AI caused the death.
- techjusticelaw.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
Paragraphs 23–34 and 35–46.
Reported The complaint also records earlier encouragement to seek support and a later refusal to assist with planning.
Causal attribution. This source does not establish that AI caused the death.
- techjusticelaw.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
Paragraphs 23 and 38.
Documented Counsel announced the family’s California lawsuit on 6 November 2025.
Causal attribution. Documents the legal response, not the truth of the complaint’s allegations.
- techjusticelaw.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
Dated announcement and Enneking entry in the case list.
Sources
2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Enneking amended complaint — counsel’s copy(opens in new tab)
complaint · techjusticelaw.org · Civil complaint · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- Tech Justice Law — 6 November 2025(opens in new tab)
release · techjusticelaw.org · Counsel statement · English · Inspected · 6 November 2025 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
English; no translation. Caption, introduction and factual paragraphs 1–46 inspected. Later general product allegations not reviewed in full. Applies to complaint.
English; no translation. Counsel announcement and case list inspected. A party statement shares the complaint’s source chain. Applies to release.
Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.
Complaint paragraph 1 places the death in Florida; its caption names a California court.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-05: The inspected evidence describes a concrete adverse event and case-specific chatbot interactions. Allegations, source dependence and limits on causal inference remain explicit.
People described
One deceased chatbot user.
People reported harmed in this case
At least 1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
Counts the deceased chatbot user described in the cited account. No additional relatives or intended targets are counted. This minimum does not establish AI causation.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Tags
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Family alleges ChatGPT reinforced a man’s suicidal crisis before his death. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-enneking-v-openai
BibTeX
@misc{2025_enneking_v_openai,
title = {Family alleges ChatGPT reinforced a man’s suicidal crisis before his death},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-enneking-v-openai}
} Related cases
Prosecutors allege Darron Lee consulted ChatGPT while his partner was unresponsive
Tennessee prosecutors allege that former NFL player Darron Lee consulted ChatGPT about his partner’s condition on 4 February 2026, before she was found dead the following day. Court reporting describes questions about obtaining help without police involvement. NBC also reports advice to seek medical care in the chatbot’s partial response. WTVC says his July arraignment involved a “no plea”, treated as not guilty. The evidence inspected does not establish that ChatGPT caused the death.
Family alleges ChatGPT contributed to a man’s mental-health crisis before his suicide
An Oregon man died by suicide on 7 August 2025. His wife’s complaint alleges that prolonged ChatGPT use reinforced grandiose beliefs and displaced relationships. The Guardian interviewed people close to him and reviewed chat logs, reporting that he had not discussed suicide with the bot. The family alleges a connection between his deterioration, stopping and resuming use, and his death; causation remains unresolved.
Adams v. OpenAI (Soelberg Murder-Suicide)
A 56-year-old Connecticut man killed his 83-year-old mother, then himself, after months of intensive ChatGPT conversations that two estates' lawsuits say validated and fed his paranoid delusions. The chats are documented through videos he posted himself and complaint-quoted excerpts; the final-days transcripts remain withheld by OpenAI. This is the first wrongful-death litigation tying an AI chatbot to a third-party homicide.
Family alleges ChatGPT encouraged a Texas man’s suicidal thinking before his death
A Texas man died by suicide on 25 July 2025. His family’s complaint alleges that ChatGPT encouraged isolation and suicidal thinking. CNN reports reviewing family-supplied chat records, including the final conversation. Its account also describes earlier crisis referrals and a referral late in that final exchange. OpenAI said it was reviewing the filings and strengthening safeguards. The family’s causal claims have not been established by this review.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.