Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity Lawsuit Filed

Cumberland, Rhode Island: a woman's lawsuit, as relayed by the ACLU of Rhode Island, says police falsely arrested her after concluding that a Flock camera photograph of a fleeing driver matched her license photo; the ACLU dates the arrest to 2025 and asked the town to cancel its Flock contract

The ACLU of Rhode Island reported in August 2026 on a federal lawsuit filed in June by a woman who says Cumberland police falsely arrested her. According to the lawsuit as the ACLU describes it, an officer saw a car turn without signalling and a short chase followed. Officers then used Facebook to identify a person they believed was the driver. A police officer's report from March 2025, quoted in the ACLU's letter, says a sergeant captured a photograph from a Flock camera of the driver during the pursuit and that the photograph matched the woman's license photo. The lawsuit says that identification was wrong. The ACLU said the report shows the town's Flock license plate cameras also photograph drivers and passengers, which it says was not disclosed when the cameras were approved in 2024. On 7 August 2026 it asked the Town Council to cancel the Flock contract.

AI system
Flock Safety license plate readers
Flock Safety
Occurred
2025
Reported
7 August 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Relation unknown
Reported harm
Loss of Liberty
Whose AI use
An institution’s AI use
Setting
Justice · Privacy
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 3 sources, 1 underlying account
4 claims: 4 reported. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: Flock Safety automated license plate reader camera in Cumberland from which police took a photograph of a car's driver (police officer's report as quoted by the ACLU of Rhode Island)

What Happened

The ACLU of Rhode Island published a news item and a letter to the Cumberland Town Council on 7 August 2026. They describe a false arrest lawsuit filed in June by private counsel on behalf of a woman arrested by Cumberland police. According to the lawsuit as the ACLU relays it, the arrest followed an incident in which an officer reportedly saw a car make turns without using a turn signal, leading to a short car chase. Officers then used Facebook to identify someone they believed was the driver. The letter quotes the narrative report of a Cumberland police officer, filed as an exhibit to the lawsuit, which says a sergeant captured a photograph from the Flock camera of the driver during the pursuit, that the photograph matched the woman's license photo, and that a male appeared to be hiding in the passenger seat. The ACLU's news item dates that report to March 2025 and says its conclusion was wrong. The ACLU's publication page describes the arrest as made in 2025. The letter says the Town Council approved more than a dozen Flock cameras two years earlier and that nothing was said then about photographing people. It asks the council to disclose all capabilities of the cameras, when they began capturing photographs of drivers and passengers, and how often they have been used that way, and to cancel the contract.

Reported harm

According to her lawsuit as relayed by the ACLU of Rhode Island, the woman was falsely arrested by Cumberland police on the strength of a Flock camera photograph that officers wrongly took to show her.

Outcome

Ongoing

The woman filed a federal lawsuit against the Town of Cumberland in June 2026, which the ACLU of Rhode Island described as ongoing on 7 August 2026. The ACLU, which is not counsel in the case, wrote to the Town Council the same day asking it to cancel its Flock contract and to tell the public what the cameras capture.

What remains unknown

  • The date of the arrest, the charges and how long the woman was held.
  • How the charges were resolved.
  • The town's and the police department's response to the lawsuit and to the letter.
  • How the Flock photograph was retrieved and whether any automated comparison was used.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The ACLU of Rhode Island, relaying the lawsuit and quoting a Cumberland police officer's report, says police captured a photograph of the fleeing car's driver from a Flock Safety automated license plate reader camera and concluded that it matched the woman's license photo. The comparison of the two photographs was made by officers. No body read describes any automated matching of faces.

4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported According to a federal lawsuit filed in June 2026, as relayed by the ACLU of Rhode Island, Cumberland police falsely arrested a woman after using an image taken by a Flock camera to wrongly identify her as the driver in a short car chase.

Causal attribution. Allegations in the lawsuit as relayed by the ACLU of Rhode Island; the complaint was not cited and the town's response was not found. The filing date is from the exhibit header reproduced in the letter PDF.

  • riaclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'a false arrest lawsuit filed in June by private counsel on behalf of a woman who was falsely arrested by Cumberland Police after they used an image taken by a Flock camera to wrongly identify her'; 'resulted in a short car chase'
  • riaclu.org(opens in new tab) context · English
    'Filed 06/16/26'
Reported A Cumberland police officer's report from March 2025, filed with the lawsuit, says a sergeant captured a photograph from the Flock camera of the driver during the pursuit and that the photograph matched the woman's license photo.

Causal attribution. The officer's report as quoted by the ACLU of Rhode Island from the lawsuit exhibit; the exhibit text itself could not be extracted.

Reported According to the lawsuit as relayed by the ACLU of Rhode Island, officers used Facebook to identify the person they believed was the driver.

Causal attribution. Allegation in the lawsuit as relayed.

  • riaclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The police officers then used Facebook to identify someone that they believed was the driver'
Reported The ACLU of Rhode Island describes the arrest as made in 2025. On 7 August 2026 it asked the Cumberland Town Council to cancel the town's Flock contract and to disclose when the cameras began capturing photographs of drivers and passengers.

Causal attribution. The ACLU of Rhode Island's own statements.

  • riaclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'regarding a false arrest made in 2025'
  • riaclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'has called on the Cumberland Town Council to cancel its contract with Flock Safety'; 'at what point the ALPRs began being used to also capture photos of drivers and passengers in vehicles'
  • riaclu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'urge the Town Council to reconsider, and cancel, its contract'

Sources

3 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read live in English on 2026-10-05 (ACLU of Rhode Island news item, 7 August 2026). The ACLU of Rhode Island is not counsel in the lawsuit; it relays the complaint and an attached police report. Applies to s1.

Read live in English on 2026-10-05 via pdftotext (ACLU of Rhode Island letter to the Cumberland Town Council, 7 August 2026, three pages). It quotes the Cumberland police officer's report filed as an exhibit to the lawsuit; the attached report page itself is an image and yielded no text. Applies to s2.

Read live in English on 2026-10-05 (ACLU of Rhode Island publication page for the letter, dated 7 August 2026). The page lists the letter and the complaint; its one-sentence description of the letter is carried in the page's og:description metadata, which the saved body file appends. Applies to s3.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: United States.

The arrest was made by police in Cumberland, Rhode Island, and the lawsuit against the town is in federal court (ACLU of Rhode Island). The bodies read do not say where the woman lives.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-05: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional-use case consistent with the held Flock photograph rows. The ACLU of Rhode Island, relaying a federal lawsuit and quoting the police officer's report filed with it, says Cumberland police arrested a woman after concluding that a Flock camera photograph of a fleeing driver matched her license photo. All three sources come from one organisation relaying one lawsuit, so every claim is reported and causation is alleged. The woman is not named.

People described

A woman who sued the Town of Cumberland through private counsel (the plaintiff in the case caption; not named here)

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person, the woman who was arrested and later sued (ACLU of Rhode Island). Exact 1.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#flock#alpr#license-plate-reader#driver-photograph#misidentification#false-arrest#rhode-island#cumberland#justice#lawsuit

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Cumberland, Rhode Island: a woman's lawsuit, as relayed by the ACLU of Rhode Island, says police falsely arrested her after concluding that a Flock camera photograph of a fleeing driver matched her license photo; the ACLU dates the arrest to 2025 and asked the town to cancel its Flock contract. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-cumberland-rhode-island-flock-camera-photo-driver-misidentification-false-arrest-lawsuit

BibTeX

@misc{2025_cumberland_rhode_island_flock_camera_photo_driver_misidentification_false_arrest_lawsuit,
  title = {Cumberland, Rhode Island: a woman's lawsuit, as relayed by the ACLU of Rhode Island, says police falsely arrested her after concluding that a Flock camera photograph of a fleeing driver matched her license photo; the ACLU dates the arrest to 2025 and asked the town to cancel its Flock contract},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-cumberland-rhode-island-flock-camera-photo-driver-misidentification-false-arrest-lawsuit}
}

Related cases

Medium Flock Safety license plate readers

Tulsa County, Oklahoma: a federal judge ruled on 1 October 2026 that a sheriff's deputy's warrantless search of a driver's month-long location history in the Flock and VehicleManager licence-plate-reader systems, run because her car had California plates, violated her Fourth Amendment rights, and suppressed all evidence obtained after the search; she had been held in pretrial detention since May

In an opinion and order of 1 October 2026 in a federal drug prosecution in the Northern District of Oklahoma, Judge Sara E. Hill found that a Tulsa County deputy sheriff followed a driver's car on the highway for no apparent reason other than its California licence plate and queried it in the Flock and VehicleManager automated licence plate reader (ALPR) systems, which 404 Media describes as an AI-powered surveillance system. The court found that the search returned more than 50 records of her whereabouts across the country over a month, that it was a warrantless search without probable cause in violation of her Fourth Amendment rights, and that all evidence obtained after the deputy began the ALPR search must be suppressed. The deputy had stopped her for a lane change, detained her for a dog sniff after she refused consent, and searched the car; 404 Media reports that he found 91 pounds of methamphetamine. The docket shows she was ordered detained pending trial in May 2026. After the ruling her lawyer asked the court to revoke the detention order, saying the evidence relied on to detain her is inadmissible. Flock told 404 Media it expects the ruling to be appealed.

Medium Flock Safety license plate readers

Brookfield, Wisconsin: police stopped a woman's car on Interstate 94 with guns drawn in August 2026 after a Flock camera flagged it on a homicide wanted-vehicle alert that Milwaukee police had failed to remove

FOX6 News Milwaukee reported that at about 4:45 p.m. on Thursday 6 August Brookfield police pulled a car over on Interstate 94 with guns drawn after a Flock license-plate camera flagged it for a Milwaukee homicide. The woman driving told FOX6 that officers handcuffed the occupants. When Brookfield police called the Milwaukee Police Department, it said the car and the people inside were no longer needed, and officers let them go. Milwaukee police told FOX6 that staff had failed to remove a wanted-vehicle alert from the system and said this was a personnel issue and not a Flock issue. The Brookfield police chief said the officers acted consistently with the information they had. The woman said Milwaukee police had also stopped her with guns drawn earlier that week and towed her car. She said she had not slept since, and that she was scared to drive her car and her daughter did not want to ride in it.

Low Flock Safety license plate readers

Plymouth, Minnesota: police boxed in and detained an automotive journalist and the journalist's wife for about an hour in June 2026 after Flock cameras matched a loaned Range Rover's plate to an incomplete stolen-plate entry

An automotive journalist for The Drive wrote that on a Sunday afternoon in late June four Plymouth police cars boxed in the Range Rover press vehicle the journalist was testing, in a Kohl's parking lot. Officers ordered the journalist and the journalist's wife out, patted the journalist down, questioned both and said the plates were stolen. According to the account, officers said they had tracked the vehicle for days through Flock license-plate cameras and acted on a camera alert that morning. The couple were released after about an hour, once the manufacturer explained that a similar plate had been reported stolen in California. In a follow-up, Flock's chief communications officer said the stolen plate had been entered without its two middle digits and that the system matched what it was asked to find. The spokesperson said an alert does not equal probable cause. The police chief acknowledged that officers did not get it right. A second journalist with a similar plate was later stopped in Nebraska.

Medium Flock Safety license plate readers

Sherwood, Arkansas: a driver and passenger with a one-month-old child are detained after an officer draws his weapon because a Flock camera misread their plate by one letter as a stolen vehicle's

KATV reported on 18 March 2026 that in February a Flock license-plate-reader camera in Sherwood, Arkansas flagged a black Chevrolet Tahoe as stolen. An officer stopped the car in a Kohl's parking lot, drew his weapon and detained the driver; a second officer arrived and the passenger, who was in the back seat next to a one-month-old child, was also detained. According to the incident report, the plate the camera matched belonged to the stolen vehicle in its system and the stopped car was a different vehicle: the camera's read was off by one letter. The officers released both people once they realized the mistake. After the incident the Sherwood Police Department set up a Flock transparency portal.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents