Skip to main content
NOPE
Low reported severity

North Carolina state senator alleges an appliance advertisement used an altered version of her TED Talk, by AI or other means

State Senator DeAndrea Salvador alleges in a federal complaint filed in August 2025 that an advertisement for Whirlpool's Brazilian brand Consul, made by the agency DM9, used her 2018 TED Talk with altered voice and visuals so that she appeared to say things she did not say, and that this caused reputational harm and emotional distress. Cannes Lions stated on 27 June 2025 that AI-generated and manipulated content was used within the campaign's case film to simulate real-world events and campaign outcomes, and withdrew the Grand Prix. The festival statement does not name the plaintiff. The defendants' response to the complaint is not inspected.

AI system
Unidentified AI tool
Occurred
Jun 2025
Reported
27 June 2025
Event location
Brazil
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Reputational HarmPsychological Distress
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Advertising · Justice
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 5 sources, 2 underlying accounts
6 claims: 2 documented, 4 reported. 5 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 1 person

AI system as recorded: Unidentified AI tools: the complaint alleges alteration "using AI, or some other means", and Cannes Lions found AI-generated and manipulated content in the campaign case film; the tool and whether it was used on the plaintiff's footage are not established

Reported harm

The plaintiff alleges in her complaint that the altered advertisement caused her reputational harm, ridicule and severe emotional distress.

What remains unknown

  • Date the advertisement was created and first released is not established in inspected sources. The June 2025 event month rests on the Cannes award (19 June 2025) and the journalist contact (20 June 2025) in the complaint, so an earlier release, including before 2025, is not excluded.
  • Which AI tools altered the footage, and whether the alteration of the plaintiff's footage (as opposed to CNN Brasil footage) is the AI content found by Cannes Lions, is not established by the Cannes Lions statement.
  • The defendants' response to the complaint and the lawsuit outcome are not inspected.
  • The Washington Post article listed by the archive (30 November 2025) could not be retrieved (HTTP 403 via relay, no body) and is not cited.
  • The complaint's claim that the plaintiff's footage was altered was not independently verified against the advertisement itself.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. Claim c6 (complaint: AI, or some other means) and claim c2 (festival finding). The Cannes Lions statement records a festival finding of AI-generated and manipulated content in the case film. The complaint attributes the alteration of the plaintiff's footage to AI "or some other means". The plaintiff's footage is tied to AI only by her allegations and press reports of them.

6 claims: 2 documented, 4 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported The plaintiff alleges that an advertising campaign for the Consul appliance brand used her 2018 TED Talk in altered form, with changed voice and visuals, so that she appeared to say things she did not say.

Causal attribution. Allegation of the plaintiff, made in a complaint and in one interview. No defendant response is inspected. The complaint states the alteration was made "using AI, or some other means".

Documented Cannes Lions stated that AI-generated and manipulated content was used within the case film for the Consul campaign "Efficient Way to Pay" to simulate real world events and campaign outcomes, and withdrew the Grand Prix and associated prizes.

Causal attribution. The statement establishes the festival finding and the withdrawal. It does not name the plaintiff or state which footage was altered.

  • canneslions.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    This follows the discovery that AI-generated and manipulated content was used within the case film to simulate real world events and campaign outcomes
  • canneslions.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    we concluded that the only appropriate course of action was to mutually withdraw the entry from the Festival, and therefore withdraw the Grand Prix and associated prizes.
Reported The plaintiff alleges that the campaign caused her reputational harm, ridicule and severe emotional distress.

Causal attribution. Allegation in the complaint, repeated by two outlets. The complaint states the distress followed her discovery of the altered footage. Distress is not independently verified.

Documented The plaintiff filed a federal civil complaint (W.D.N.C., case 3:25-cv-628) on 20 August 2025 against Omnicom Group, Whirlpool Corporation, DDB Worldwide Communications Group, DM9DDB and Whirlpool do Brasil (Consul), asserting five counts including misappropriation of likeness, unfair and deceptive trade practices, false advertising, intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation.

Causal attribution. The filing establishes its own existence and contents. Its allegations remain allegations.

Reported DM9 publicly acknowledged "a series of errors" in producing and submitting the case video, and its chief creative officer was removed or stepped down.

Causal attribution. Courthouse News relays a DM9 LinkedIn statement announcing the removal; Campaign Brief Asia relays Adweek for the step-down and DM9 for "a series of errors". Both are secondhand. The text inspected does not tie the errors to the plaintiff's footage specifically.

Reported The complaint alleges the plaintiff's name, image, likeness and persona were altered using AI, or some other means.

Causal attribution. Plaintiff's allegation. The complaint does not identify the tool.

Sources

5 sources inspected, from 2 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Event countries: Brazil. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.

Courthouse News describes the advertisement as promoting appliances in Brazil for Consul. The complaint states the plaintiff is a resident of North Carolina, United States, and was filed in the Western District of North Carolina.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: Complaint text, a festival statement and press coverage inspected. Alteration and harm are the plaintiff's allegations. The festival finding of AI-manipulated content is documented in its own statement but does not name the plaintiff. Public figure named as the litigant in a public filing. The event month (June 2025) is the month of the Cannes Grand Prix (19 June) and of the journalist's contact with the plaintiff (20 June), the earliest dated events in the complaint (paras 52 and 56); the campaign's own release date is not stated and may precede June 2025.

People reported harmed in this case

At least 1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person, the plaintiff, who reports harm from the altered advertisement. CNN Brasil (an organisation), the festival juries and the public are not counted.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). North Carolina state senator alleges an appliance advertisement used an altered version of her TED Talk, by AI or other means. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-brazil-consul-ad-ted-talk-nc-state-senator-alleged-ai-alteration

BibTeX

@misc{2025_brazil_consul_ad_ted_talk_nc_state_senator_alleged_ai_alteration,
  title = {North Carolina state senator alleges an appliance advertisement used an altered version of her TED Talk, by AI or other means},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-brazil-consul-ad-ted-talk-nc-state-senator-alleged-ai-alteration}
}

Related cases

High Unidentified video tool

São Paulo: a 37-year-old influencer used AI 'deepfake' tools to insert photographs of young women and adolescent girls of the Congregação Cristã do Brasil, taken from their social-media profiles without consent, into sexualised videos set inside churches; a 16-year-old and a 17-year-old filed police reports and the Civil Police investigate under the child-protection statute

A humorist and tyre repairer from Lençóis Paulista, São Paulo state, who posts on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and TikTok as an impersonator of a television presenter, used AI tools to turn photographs that young women and adolescent girls of the Congregação Cristã do Brasil (CCB) had posted from inside churches into videos in which they appear dancing sensually beside women in short skirts, with the presenter inserted and the influencer commenting on their clothes. A 16-year-old congregant and her parents went to the 8ª Delegacia de Defesa da Mulher in São Paulo in February 2026; g1 made the case public on 22 April 2026 and Folha de S.Paulo confirmed the investigation. The girl told g1 the photograph had been taken in 2025 in front of the altar of a CCB church, that she was very shy, had not wanted to be exposed and was afraid the exposure would affect her social life, and that she had stopped taking photographs of herself; her family sued for moral damages. On 30 April 2026 the mother of a second girl, aged 17, registered a police report at the 4ª DDM Norte; g1 reported that the exposure had affected the girl psychologically. The São Paulo Civil Police investigate under article 241-C of the Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente (simulating a sex or pornography scene with a minor by digital means) and for defamation of adult women in the videos; the inquiry was sent at the prosecutor's request to Lençóis Paulista, where the suspect lives, and the total number of people depicted was still being established. The influencer admitted making the videos with AI, said through his lawyer that they were satire and criticism of customs in a context of humour, said he did not know some of those depicted were minors, denied in his police statement linking the adolescent's image to sexualised content and said he had taken her for an adult, and posted an apology video (dated 5 April by g1's first report, which says it does not mention the deepfakes; described as posted after his police statement in g1's second report). The CCB said it had identified him, was taking internal measures and supports legal measures by the authorities. No later development was found on 2026-09-22.

Medium Unidentified video tool

Rajasthan: a social-media influencer's video of a Ganga dip at Haridwar was manipulated with AI into an objectionable reel that went viral; she says she is mentally disturbed and cannot leave her house, and filed a cyber-crime complaint on 16 September 2026

A Rajasthan social-media influencer visited Haridwar with her family in June 2026 and on 6 June uploaded to Instagram a short video, recorded by relatives, of herself taking a dip in the Ganga at Har Ki Pauri wearing a salwar suit. About two months later she found that the video had been manipulated with AI into an objectionable version showing the same movements with her face and body portrayed 'in a shameful manner'; the fake reel went viral in the week before 20 September and drew objectionable comments and re-sharing. In a public appeal she asked whoever uploaded it to remove it, saying it was a matter of her dignity, that she was mentally very disturbed and had reached a point where she could not step out of her house. She filed a complaint with the cyber-crime police on 16 September 2026; the investigating Rajasthan Police Service officer said they were trying to identify who created and circulated the video and to have it removed, and that identifying the accused would take time. Dainik Bhaskar's English edition reported the case on 20 September in a 'Sunday Big Story' that does not name her.

High Unidentified image and video tool

New York: the Manhattan District Attorney seized 12 websites selling AI-generated sexual deepfakes of about 1,200 real people

On 14 September 2026 Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced the seizure of 12 domain names used to disseminate, publish and sell non-consensual AI-generated sexual 'deepfake' videos. His office said individuals under investigation had used AI image- and video-creation tools to turn photos and videos of approximately 1,200 real people, overwhelmingly women, into hyper-realistic sexual imagery without consent. The victims included actors, politicians, athletes, musicians, activists and social-media influencers. WIRED and outside researchers reported that many videos reposted content from the defunct MrDeepFakes platform and that dozens of politicians appeared on the sites; investigations into who ran them are ongoing.

High Unidentified image tool

Delhi: a 25-year-old content creator says her photograph was morphed with AI face-swapping tools onto a vulgar image beside the Prime Minister, printed on banners paraded at a Cockroach Janta Party protest at Jantar Mantar and circulated online; FIR registered 24 September 2026, Delhi High Court orders Meta takedown within 24 hours and police protection on 25 September

A 25-year-old content creator from Delhi complained to the police that organisers and demonstrators at a Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) protest at Jantar Mantar had taken her personal photograph without consent, used AI face-swapping tools to morph her face onto a vulgar, compromising image alongside Prime Minister Narendra Modi, printed the image on banners waved before crowds with sexually suggestive slogans, and circulated videos of the banners on Instagram and other platforms; her later High Court petition adds that the images were uploaded to pornographic websites and that she has received rape, acid-attack and death threats. The Delhi Police registered an FIR against unknown persons at the New Delhi cyber police station on 24 September 2026 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. On 25 September Justice Girish Kathpalia of the Delhi High Court directed Meta Platforms to remove the objectionable content within 24 hours, ordered the Delhi Police to give the petitioner complete protection and file a status report within a week, issued notice to the four CJP functionaries named in her plea, ordered the registry to redact the impugned web links from the petition (and, per PTI, her name), and listed the matter for 14 October 2026 (PTI, Ommcom News). The police told the court the FIR had been registered the previous day and that action would be taken expeditiously; no accused had been named or arrested at that stage. The petition says the protest took place in July 2026 and that she approached the police on 23 September; the CJP had not commented at the time of the first report.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents