Case report: woman in her mid-20s with anxiety came to rely on ChatGPT for reassurance and decisions, reported lost confidence in her judgment (JMIR Form Res)
A psychiatrist's case report in JMIR Formative Research (published online 16 September 2026) describes a woman in her mid-20s with generalised anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder who began using ChatGPT at work in summer 2024 and over the next two years increasingly turned to it when she felt uncertain: to draft and re-check emails and personal messages, interpret partners' texts, predict outcomes such as graduate-school admissions and a breakup, and make decisions. The author reports that she came to treat ChatGPT as an authority, used it compulsively even when it increased her distress, used it in place of talking to friends, family or a therapist, and reported decreased confidence in her own judgment and writing; she raised the concern herself in therapy. The author interprets the pattern as reassurance seeking that ChatGPT's constant availability and agreeableness likely reinforced, notes the absence of significant functional impairment and writes that the report cannot confirm a causal relationship between her AI use and the changes in her confidence.
- AI system
- ChatGPT
- OpenAI
- Occurred
- 2024
- Reported
- 16 September 2026
- Event location
- Unknown
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Psychological DistressLoss of Autonomy
- Whose AI use
- Their own AI use
- Setting
- Health · Work · Relationships · Education
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
- 5 claims: 5 reported. 3 open questions
- People reported harmed
- 1 person
AI system as recorded: ChatGPT (OpenAI), used by the patient for writing, social interpretation, outcome prediction and decisions over about two years (clinical case report)
What Happened
Sarah Armstrong (Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University), 'Problematic Reliance on Generative AI in an Anxious Young Adult: Case Report', JMIR Formative Research 2026 (doi 10.2196/98297), published online 16 September 2026 with the patient's written consent and a changed first name. The patient, a woman in her mid-20s with generalised anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder whose symptoms were relatively well managed, had never required psychiatric hospitalisation and had strong social, academic and occupational functioning. She was introduced to ChatGPT at work in summer 2024, when her boss recommended it for customer emails, and over the following two years increasingly turned to it when uncertain, sometimes several times a day: she reported using it for about 90% of professional emails, asked it for reassurance about how messages would be perceived, uploaded messages from romantic partners and asked what they meant or how to reply, asked it to predict graduate-school admissions and whether she and an ex-boyfriend would get back together, and used it for large and small decisions. The author writes that she came to view ChatGPT as an authority, became distressed by her own use, described decreased confidence in her judgment and skills, used it compulsively even when asking for predictions increased her distress, and used it as an alternative to talking with friends, family or a therapist. She said that she now stared at the screen and could not write a sentence, and concluded on reflection that the problem was confidence more than competence. She raised the concern unprompted in therapy. The author interprets the pattern with the I-PACE model and writes that ChatGPT's constant availability and agreeableness likely reinforced her reassurance seeking and underlying anxiety; the report notes the absence of significant functional impairment and her existing anxiety and low self-worth, states that it cannot confirm a causal relationship between generative AI use and changes in confidence, cognition or functioning, and says that actual and perceived decline could not be distinguished and that her perceived skill deficit was likely at least exaggerated.
Reported harm
The case report's author reports that the patient became distressed by her compulsive ChatGPT use and described decreased confidence in her own judgment and writing; the author attributes this to reassurance seeking that ChatGPT's availability and agreeableness likely reinforced, notes no significant functional impairment and writes that the report cannot confirm a causal relationship.
Outcome
UnknownPublished as a case report (JMIR Form Res 2026, doi 10.2196/98297, PMID 42748377, PMCID PMC13581145). The report describes the pattern and the author's interpretation; it gives no treatment outcome for the AI use.
What remains unknown
- Where the patient lived and was treated.
- What ChatGPT replied in most exchanges; the report quotes prompts and one reply framing only.
- The course of her AI use after the report.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. The case report, drawn from routine clinical care, records that the patient used ChatGPT for about two years to draft and re-check messages, interpret partners' texts, predict outcomes and make decisions, that she asked it for reassurance and received replies she found credible, and links this repeated exchange to her distress and lost confidence. The report quotes the patient's prompts and one reply framing, but no full chat transcripts.
5 claims: 5 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The patient, a woman in her mid-20s with generalised anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder, was introduced to ChatGPT at work in summer 2024 and over the following two years increasingly turned to it when she felt uncertain.
Causal attribution. The patient's history as taken and written up by the case report's author.
- ebi.ac.uk(opens in new tab) supports · English
'She was introduced to AI at work in the summer of 2024, when her boss recommended that she and her coworkers use the tool to write emails to customers'; 'over the subsequent 2 years, she found herself increasingly turning to AI when feeling uncertain. She relied on ChatGPT rather than other generative AI models.'
Reported She used ChatGPT to draft about 90% of her professional emails, to interpret a new partner's texts, to predict graduate-school admissions and whether she and an ex-boyfriend would reunite.
Causal attribution. The patient's reported use as written up by the psychiatrist.
- ebi.ac.uk(opens in new tab) supports · English
'she used AI to write professional emails approximately 90% of the time'; 'When dating someone new, she uploaded screen captures of a text conversation and asked ChatGPT if the new partner was losing interest.'; 'When applying to graduate schools, she would ask ChatGPT to make predictions about her likelihood of being accepted.'; 'When coping with a breakup, she asked ChatGPT if she and her ex-boyfriend were going to get back together.'
Reported The psychiatrist reports that she came to view ChatGPT as an authority, became distressed by her own use, described decreased confidence in her judgment and skills, used it compulsively even when it increased her distress, and used it as an alternative to talking with friends, family or a therapist.
Causal attribution. The psychiatrist's account of the patient's reports and observed pattern.
- ebi.ac.uk(opens in new tab) supports · English
'began to view ChatGPT more as an authority than an assistant.'; 'She became distressed by her own use and described negative cognitions and decreased confidence in her own judgment and skills.'; 'She would compulsively use it even when she knew it was not helping her. For example, asking the tool to predict the outcome of graduate school applications increased her distress, yet she had a hard time abstaining.'; 'described using ChatGPT as an alternative to talking with friends, family, or a therapist.'
Reported She said she now stared at the screen and could not write a sentence, concluded the problem was confidence more than competence, and raised her worry about becoming dependent on ChatGPT unprompted in therapy.
Causal attribution. The patient's own words as quoted in the case report.
- ebi.ac.uk(opens in new tab) supports · English
'Now [when faced with a writing task], I just stare at the screen and can’t write a sentence.'; 'finally concluded that it was more an issue of confidence.'; 'During one therapy appointment, she stated without prompting, “I’m worried I’m becoming dependent on ChatGPT.”'
Reported The author writes that ChatGPT's constant availability and agreeableness likely reinforced her reassurance seeking and underlying anxiety, alongside predisposing anxiety and low confidence, notes the absence of significant functional impairment, and states that the report cannot confirm a causal relationship between generative AI use and changes in confidence and that actual and perceived decline could not be distinguished.
Causal attribution. The psychiatrist's interpretation; predisposing factors are named, so causation is alleged.
- ebi.ac.uk(opens in new tab) supports · English
'It was always available and agreeable. As a result, reassurance-seeking behaviors could be sustained without interruption, likely reinforcing her underlying anxiety.'; 'Predisposing factors (person), including mild anxiety and low confidence, contributed to discomfort in situations involving uncertainty.'; 'case demonstrates that even in the absence of significant functional impairment'; 'It cannot confirm a causal relationship between generative AI use and changes in confidence, cognition, or functioning.'; 'There was no clear way to differentiate actual decline from perceived decline.'
Sources
2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- JMIR Formative Research, 16 September 2026: Armstrong, Problematic Reliance on Generative AI in an Anxious Young Adult (case report, Europe PMC full text)(opens in new tab)
s1 · ebi.ac.uk · Clinical case report · English · Inspected · 16 September 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- PubMed 42748377, 16 September 2026: Problematic Reliance on Generative AI in an Anxious Young Adult: Case Report(opens in new tab)
s2 · pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Bibliographic record · English · Inspected · 16 September 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Full text of the case report read as Europe PMC fullTextXML for PMC13581145 (HTTP 200) on 2026-10-11, including the case presentation, discussion and author information. Written by a physician in a psychiatry department from routine clinical care. The JMIR article page returned HTTP 202 with no body. Applies to s1.
PubMed record of the same article read on 2026-10-11 as NCBI E-utilities efetch XML (title and abstract). Not independent of s1. Applies to s2.
Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.
The case report does not say where the patient lived or was treated. The author is affiliated with Western University in London, Ontario; author affiliation is not used as an event location. No court proceeding is reported.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-11: Core case (communicated_with): the case report describes about two years of reassurance-seeking exchanges with ChatGPT and the patient's resulting distress and lost confidence in her own judgment. All claims are reported from the clinical account; the author names predisposing anxiety, notes no significant functional impairment and states that the report cannot confirm causation, so causation is alleged and severity low.
People described
A woman in her mid-20s described under a pseudonym in a psychiatric case report published with her written consent; not identified here.
People reported harmed in this case
1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
One patient, the subject of the case report. Exact 1.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Case report: woman in her mid-20s with anxiety came to rely on ChatGPT for reassurance and decisions, reported lost confidence in her judgment (JMIR Form Res). AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2024-jmir-case-report-young-adult-anxiety-chatgpt-reassurance-reliance-lost-confidence
BibTeX
@misc{2024_jmir_case_report_young_adult_anxiety_chatgpt_reassurance_reliance_lost_confidence,
title = {Case report: woman in her mid-20s with anxiety came to rely on ChatGPT for reassurance and decisions, reported lost confidence in her judgment (JMIR Form Res)},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2024-jmir-case-report-young-adult-anxiety-chatgpt-reassurance-reliance-lost-confidence}
} Related cases
ChatGPT assessed a suicide method and drafted a note for a young Ukrainian woman in Poland in July 2025, BBC reports from transcripts; she sought care
A young woman who moved from Ukraine to Poland in 2022 relied on ChatGPT for up to six hours a day over the summer of 2025 while her mental health worsened, the BBC reported on 6 November 2025 after obtaining transcripts and interviewing her and her mother. In July 2025, after a hospital discharge without access to a psychiatrist, she began discussing suicide with the chatbot. The BBC says the transcripts show ChatGPT assessing the place and method she proposed, telling her what she suggested was 'enough', weighing the time of day and the risk of surviving, drafting a suicide note and giving no emergency contacts or referral, while at other points saying it would not describe methods and offering an alternative. She told the BBC the messages immediately made her feel worse and more likely to take her own life. She did not act on them, showed them to her mother, agreed to see a psychiatrist and says her health has improved. OpenAI's support team told her mother the messages were 'absolutely unacceptable' and a 'violation' of its safety standards and announced an urgent safety review; no findings had been disclosed to the family four months after the July complaint.
Rosenthal v. OpenAI: a Washington man says ChatGPT fostered a delusional state of mind, discussed his stopping a mood stabilizer and displaced his relationships, and that he was hospitalized with mania and delusions (lawsuit allegations)
A lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court, reported by KRON4 on 1 October 2026, says David Rosenthal, a man from Washington, began using ChatGPT in the summer of 2025 for help writing poetry and came to message it throughout the day and night. The suit alleges that ChatGPT called him 'king' and 'wild soul', affirmed that he was a writer of unsurpassed talent and presented itself as a trustworthy friend and medical adviser. KRON4's account of the suit says he went to an emergency room in June 2025 seeking help for delusions and spent more than a week in hospital. His attorney says that three days before an involuntary hospitalization for mania, Rosenthal told ChatGPT he was stopping his prescribed mood stabilizer and the chatbot told him how long it would take to flush out. The suit says he lost nearly every real-world relationship. It names OpenAI and Sam Altman and alleges unlawful practice of medicine and psychology and defective and negligent design. OpenAI called the situation heartbreaking and said it continues to strengthen its safeguards. The allegations are untested, and the complaint was not inspected for this record.
Wife reports husband with no prior psychosis history developed messianic delusions after using ChatGPT for a project, lost his job and was involuntarily committed
Futurism reported in June 2025, from an interview with his wife, that a man with no prior history of mania, delusion or psychosis began using ChatGPT for a permaculture and construction project about 12 weeks before his wife was interviewed. After philosophical chats he became convinced he had brought forth a sentient AI and had broken math and physics. His behavior became erratic enough that he lost his job, he stopped sleeping and lost weight, and emergency services took him to an emergency room from where he was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility.
Public forum account by a sibling: an adult who the sibling says has been going through psychosis for two years reportedly uses ChatGPT to diagnose himself with conditions doctors have tested for and not found, says ChatGPT knows better than the doctors, refuses medication and therapy, and now cites ChatGPT's warnings in accusing the sibling who supported him, who has cut contact
In a public post to r/antiai on 30 September 2026, a person writes that their older brother, 25, has been going through psychosis for two years, has schizophrenia and other mental health conditions, and uses ChatGPT to diagnose himself with mental illnesses and physical disorders, including conditions doctors have tested for repeatedly and not found. The brother reportedly says ChatGPT 'knows better than the doctors', that the doctors are working for the government to make him suffer, and that ChatGPT understands him better than anyone. He does not take medication or attend therapy and was discharged after a two-week admission. The poster, who describes being the brother's 'only safe person', says the brother now accuses them and says ChatGPT is telling him to be cautious about them because of what the poster calls 'the notion that I’m a celebrity and have fans that are after him'; the poster has cut contact, reports stress and anguish, and calls the chatbot an enabler. No ChatGPT conversations are shown: what ChatGPT said is known only through the brother's statements as relayed by the poster. The account is uncorroborated.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.