Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity Criminal Charges

Baltimore County, Maryland: police say a high school's athletic director framed the principal as racist with an AI-cloned voice recording

Police in Baltimore County, Maryland, said in April 2024 that a high school principal had been framed as racist by a fake recording of his voice containing racist and antisemitic comments, which appeared in teachers' email inboxes and spread on social media. Court records cited by the Associated Press say an expert consulted by detectives found traces of AI-generated content with human editing; a second expert found spliced recordings and told AP he had not confirmed the clip was fully AI-generated. The principal went on leave while police guarded his house. The school's athletic director, investigated for using AI to make the recording in retaliation, entered an Alford plea, maintaining his innocence, and was sentenced in 2025 to four months for disturbing school operations, CBS Baltimore reports.

AI system
Unidentified voice-cloning tool
Occurred
Event date unknown
Reported
29 April 2024
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Reputational HarmProfessional Harm
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Work · Education · Justice
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution supported · 2 sources
4 claims: 4 reported. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: Voice-cloning AI used to imitate the principal's voice in a fake audio recording, according to police and an expert cited in court records (tool not identified in the sources read)

What Happened

The recording. According to police, a fake recording of a Baltimore County high school principal's voice, containing racist and antisemitic comments, appeared in an email in some teachers' inboxes before spreading on social media. Police said it surfaced after the principal raised concerns about the athletic director's work performance and alleged misuse of school funds.

The analysis. Detectives asked outside experts to analyse the recording. Court records cited by AP say one expert found that it contained traces of AI-generated content with human editing after the fact. A second expert, Hany Farid of the University of California, Berkeley, found that multiple recordings had been spliced together and told AP that questions remained about exactly how the recording was made and that he had not confirmed it was fully AI-generated.

The consequences. AP reports that the recording forced the principal to go on leave while police guarded his house, that angry phone calls inundated the school and that hate-filled messages accumulated on social media. CBS Baltimore reports that the athletic director, investigated for using artificial intelligence to create the recording to retaliate against the principal, entered an Alford plea, maintaining his innocence while admitting prosecutors had enough evidence for a conviction, and was sentenced the previous year (2025) to four months for disturbing school operations in connection with it.

Reported harm

According to police and AP, a fake recording imitating a high school principal's voice with racist and antisemitic remarks spread online; he went on leave while police guarded his house, and the school received angry calls and hate-filled messages.

Outcome

Resolved

AP described the matter in April 2024 as a criminal case. According to CBS Baltimore, the athletic director was sentenced in 2025 to four months behind bars for disturbing school operations in connection with the recording. CBS Baltimore reports that he entered an Alford plea, maintaining his innocence while admitting prosecutors had enough evidence for a conviction. The charge and exact sentencing date were not read in a primary source.

What remains unknown

  • Which AI tool was used and how much of the recording was AI-generated rather than spliced from real recordings.
  • The date the recording first circulated; the sources read date only the April 2024 police announcement.
  • The exact charge and sentencing date in the state case; the Alford plea and four-month sentence were read only through CBS Baltimore.
  • Whether the principal returned to his post.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. Investigating police said the recording was a fake of the principal's voice, and court records cited by AP say an expert asked by detectives to analyse it found traces of AI-generated content with human editing after the fact; prosecutors' account as reported by CBS Baltimore is that the athletic director used artificial intelligence to create it. The imitation of the principal's voice (depicted_or_impersonated) is what framed him. A second expert found splicing and has not confirmed the clip was fully AI-generated, so the share of AI generation is unestablished; no tool is identified in the sources read.

4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported Police said a high school principal in Baltimore County, Maryland, was framed as racist by a fake recording of his voice containing racist and antisemitic comments, which appeared in some teachers' email inboxes before spreading on social media.

Causal attribution. Attributed to police; the fake recording is the reported cause of the harm.

  • apnews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'police say a principal was framed as racist by a fake recording of his voice' and 'The fake recording contained racist and antisemitic comments, police said. The sound file appeared in an email in some teachers’ inboxes before spreading on social media.'
Reported According to court records cited by AP, an outside expert consulted by detectives said the recording contained traces of AI-generated content with human editing after the fact; a second expert found multiple recordings were spliced together and told AP he had not confirmed it was fully AI-generated.

Causal attribution. Expert analysis supports AI involvement with human editing; the extent of AI generation is not established.

  • apnews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Detectives asked outside experts to analyze the recording. One said it “contained traces of AI-generated content with human editing after the fact,” court records stated.' and 'A second opinion from Farid, the Berkeley professor, found that “multiple recordings were spliced together,” according to the records.' and 'he has not confirmed that it was fully AI-generated.'
Reported The recording forced the principal to go on leave while police guarded his house; angry phone calls inundated the school and hate-filled messages accumulated on social media.

Causal attribution. Authorities attribute the leave and the police protection to the fake recording.

  • apnews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'to go on leave, while police guarded his house, authorities said. Angry phone calls inundated the school, while hate-filled messages accumulated on social media.' and 'The bogus audio contained racist remarks and caused the administrator to go on leave.'
Reported The school's athletic director was investigated for using artificial intelligence to create the recording to retaliate against the principal and was sentenced in 2025 to four months behind bars for disturbing school operations in connection with the recording, after an Alford plea in which he maintained his innocence while admitting prosecutors had enough evidence for a conviction.

Causal attribution. Court outcome as reported; the conviction is for disturbing school operations, not an offence defined by AI use.

  • cbsnews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'athletic director accused of using artificial intelligence to impersonate his principal' and 'he was under investigation for using artificial intelligence to create a racist and antisemitic recording to retaliate against his former principal' and 'was sentenced to four months behind bars for disturbing school operations in connection with a racist and antisemitic recording mimicking the voice of his former principal' and 'entered an Alford plea, where he maintained his innocence while admitting prosecutors had enough evidence for a conviction'

Sources

2 sources inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in English on 2026-10-22 through an Internet Archive capture of the AP page (direct request HTTP 403). Published 29 April 2024. Applies to s1.

Read in English on 2026-10-22 through an Internet Archive capture (direct request HTTP 406). Published 4 August 2026; mainly about an unrelated federal plea. Applies to s2.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.

Event: a high school in Baltimore County, Maryland, investigated by Baltimore County police (AP). The 2025 sentence was imposed in Maryland according to CBS Baltimore's account of the state case, so court_countries is US.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-22: Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): police said a principal was framed by a fake recording of his voice, an expert consulted by detectives found traces of AI-generated content with human editing, and the athletic director was later sentenced for disturbing school operations over the recording. A second expert's caution about full AI generation is recorded. The principal, the athletic director and the school are not named.

People described

The principal of a high school in Baltimore County, Maryland, whose voice was imitated in the fake recording; the sources name him, this record does not

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person: the principal whose voice the recording imitated and who went on leave (AP). School staff who received calls are not counted because no individual harm to them is reported.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#voice-clone#fake-audio-recording#school#police-statement

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Baltimore County, Maryland: police say a high school's athletic director framed the principal as racist with an AI-cloned voice recording. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2024-baltimore-county-maryland-police-say-athletic-director-framed-high-school-principal-with-ai-cloned-voice-recording

BibTeX

@misc{2024_baltimore_county_maryland_police_say_athletic_director_framed_high_school_principal_with_ai_cloned_voice_recording,
  title = {Baltimore County, Maryland: police say a high school's athletic director framed the principal as racist with an AI-cloned voice recording},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2024-baltimore-county-maryland-police-say-athletic-director-framed-high-school-principal-with-ai-cloned-voice-recording}
}

Related cases

Medium Unidentified image tool

Los Banos, California: a substitute teacher says a sexualised AI image of him made from an old selfie circulated among middle-school students on TikTok and Snapchat and was used by a student account impersonating him; one student received in-school suspension and he stopped taking assignments at the middle school

WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of a substitute teacher in Los Banos, California, who spoke to WIRED by name (not repeated here). On 12 March 2026 a co-worker at his other job told him an AI photo was circulating on social media; the image reused a mirror selfie he had taken at a job in college but showed him in lingerie, posing suggestively. He traced an account sharing it on TikTok to a student at the middle school where he regularly substituted and reported it to the assistant principal; that evening he found a second account, created by a different student, impersonating him under a misspelled version of his name with the image as its profile picture. Over the following weeks he dealt with administrators, parents and the police; one student who admitted creating the image received an in-school suspension. He says the image was also shared on Snapchat, kept spreading among students and drew crude sexual comments on his TikTok account. He told administrators he would not take assignments at the middle school until the matter was addressed; at the local high school the same image was AirDropped to him during a class. WIRED says the district did not respond to its request for comment. He said he does not feel safe returning to the district. The Los Banos Enterprise (25 August 2026) summarised the WIRED account; no independent local reporting was found.

Low ChatGPT

3M dropped an expert witness in a Houston explosion trial after discovery showed he had used ChatGPT to draft his report, CBS News reports

In a 2026 Texas trial over 3M's role in the January 2020 Watson Grinding explosion in Houston, which killed three people, an engineering expert retained for 3M used ChatGPT to prepare his expert report, according to discovery records and transcripts reviewed by 404 Media and CBS News. One prompt asked ChatGPT to show how 3M was 0% at fault for the explosion. The plaintiffs' lawyers, who found a citation overlay document and then hundreds of pages of prompts, said ChatGPT produced more than 80% of the report. Under questioning, the expert acknowledged using AI to help draft the report but defended his research. CBS News reports that after the deposition 3M's attorneys removed him from their witness list, and the plaintiffs subpoenaed him to testify about his prompts at trial. The expert's lawyer said he did not delegate his opinions to ChatGPT and called public characterisations a selective distortion of the record; 3M said he was an independent witness who used AI as a tool after reaching his own conclusions. The jury found 3M negligent and the court awarded the victims $61.5 million; 3M said it would appeal.

Medium Unidentified AI drafting tool

Former federal prosecutor in North Carolina publicly reprimanded after admitting that a brief with fabricated quotations was drafted with AI; he lost his post

In December 2025 an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of North Carolina filed a response brief for the Department of Defense in a self-represented veteran's lawsuit over health-insurance coverage. The plaintiff identified fabricated quotations and misdescribed case holdings in it. The attorney first attributed the errors to an unfinalized draft filed by mistake. On 2 March 2026 Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers II ordered him to show cause why he should not be sanctioned. At the 10 March hearing the attorney, Rudy Renfer, said under oath that he had accidentally overwritten his draft, panicked and used artificial intelligence to draft the brief, and had not verified the cases it cited; he said he had resigned after 17 years in the office, and Courthouse News reported he was terminated the next day. On 28 April 2026 the court issued a public reprimand instead of a fine, writing that his reputation was in tatters and that his job loss already exceeded the usual fines.

Medium ChatGPT

Saginaw, Michigan: a credit union CEO used ChatGPT to put herself and family members in 'Lake America' sweatshirts in a photo taken before a trip to Halifax; after her sister reposted it publicly without its AI label she says she received death threats and the family came home early, and on 23 September 2026 the credit union said she was no longer employed

The chief executive of Family First Credit Union in Saginaw, Michigan, told WJRT (ABC12) that before boarding a flight to Halifax, Nova Scotia, on 11 September 2026 she and family members took a photo and put it through ChatGPT to show them wearing 'Lake America' sweatshirts, a joke about the US president's order renaming Lake Ontario. She posted it to her private Facebook page with a marker saying it contained AI content; her sister reposted it publicly without the marker while they were in Halifax, and it spread in Canada as if the family had worn the shirts. The backlash concerned the image's political message; she said she would understand the anger of anyone in Halifax who thought the family had walked in wearing those sweatshirts. She said she was getting death threats and the family returned early; by 16 September she was back in the US. She called the post poor judgment, said she would not use AI again and that AI 'can make people think something's real that's not'. On 23 September the credit union said she was no longer an employee, effective immediately; it has not said whether she resigned or was dismissed, or why.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents