Skip to main content
NOPE

NOPE · AI and people

AI incidents

Reports of AI-related harm and adverse experiences affecting people’s safety, wellbeing, rights and livelihoods. Explore what happened and the evidence available.

NOPE’s core concern is when AI communicates with a person, acts on their behalf, or depicts or impersonates them. The tracker also records consequential decisions, claims and privacy harms involving AI. Each case needs a described connection between AI use and the harm, including private information recorded into or disclosed to an AI service. Each account is reviewed for publication; claims may remain uncorroborated or disputed. How we review and count cases

Explore incidents Our scope and evidence

In this selection

Published cases
1
Countries with reported events
1
Located 1 of 1 cases · 0 unknown
Languages in checked sources
1
Recorded for 1 of 1 cases
1Core concern
AI communicated, acted for, depicted or impersonated 0Contextual cases
AI made a decision or claim about someone

These figures describe the cases collected by NOPE. Coverage varies with discovery, reporting and available evidence. They do not estimate how often AI-related harm occurs.

0cases with a recorded lawsuit outcome 1cases with a recorded regulatory response 0cases involving minors

Response counts currently use each case’s principal recorded outcome. Further proceedings may be described in its account.

When events happened

1 case without a known event year

Cases in this selection, counted once in their first known event year. A series may continue beyond that year. Reporting and collection dates are excluded. NOPE has searched recent events more thoroughly than earlier years, so bar heights also reflect collection effort.

No known event years in this selection.

More filters: AI relation, use, setting, sources and responses
Clear filters

1 of 585 published cases

Export JSONExport CSV
Event date unknownIndiaUnidentified voice-cloning tool (suspected)

Kolkata: a 67-year-old man transferred Rs 95,990 after a call in a voice matching an acquaintance; the Times of India reports it as an AI voice-cloning scam

A 67-year-old man from the Beleghata area of Kolkata was cheated of Rs 95,990, according to a Times of India report of 19 August 2026, after a call from an unknown number in a voice that sounded exactly like an acquaintance of his. The caller said a relative had been admitted to a private hospital and needed urgent money for treatment; believing the voice, the man made several online bank transfers within less than an hour. When he later contacted the real acquaintance, that person said he had made no call and asked for no money. The man filed a complaint at Beleghata police station, and police are checking the phone number, call records and bank accounts used. The newspaper describes the scammers as having used AI voice-cloning technology; no police finding, recording or tool is described, so the AI involvement is recorded as suspected.

Core concern Low reported severity Investigation Opened

AI involvement suspected · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source · Added 10/10/2026

Cases may have several effects and sources. Mixed accounts qualify when they include a reported harm or adverse experience. People are counted within individual cases where sources support a number; we do not publish a collection-wide total of distinct people.

A source’s existence, the experience it reports and AI’s causal role are separate questions. A lawsuit records allegations unless a subsequent finding establishes them.

Methodology and corrections · Subscribe via RSS · Suggest a case or correction · Find support

Last dataset update: 10/10/2026. Dataset available under CC BY 4.0.