NOPE · AI and people

AI incidents

Name: AI incidents
Creator: NOPE
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reports of AI-related harm and adverse experiences affecting people’s safety, wellbeing, rights and livelihoods. Explore what happened and the evidence available.

NOPE’s core concern is when AI communicates with a person, acts on their behalf, or depicts or impersonates them. The tracker also records consequential decisions, claims and privacy harms involving AI. Each case needs a described connection between AI use and the harm, including private information recorded into or disclosed to an AI service. Each account is reviewed for publication; claims may remain uncorroborated or disputed. How we review and count cases

Explore incidents Our scope and evidence

In this selection

Published cases: 1
Countries with reported events: 1; Located 1 of 1 cases · 0 unknown
Languages in checked sources: 1; Recorded for 1 of 1 cases

1Core concern
AI communicated, acted for, depicted or impersonated 0Contextual cases
AI made a decision or claim about someone

These figures describe the cases collected by NOPE. Coverage varies with discovery, reporting and available evidence. They do not estimate how often AI-related harm occurs.

0cases with a recorded lawsuit outcome 0cases with a recorded regulatory response 0cases involving minors

Response counts currently use each case’s principal recorded outcome. Further proceedings may be described in its account.

When events happened

1 case without a known event year

Cases in this selection, counted once in their first known event year. A series may continue beyond that year. Reporting and collection dates are excluded. NOPE has searched recent events more thoroughly than earlier years, so bar heights also reflect collection effort.

No known event years in this selection.

Search cases Consequence Event country

More filters: AI relation, use, setting, sources and responses

AI-to-person relation Setting Whose AI use Source type inspected AI system Reported severity Response / population Legacy evidence assessment

Event year Sort by Clear filters

1 of 964 published cases

Export JSON Export CSV

Event date unknownMexicoChatGPT (reported)

Buyer says ChatGPT recommended a fake Mexican air-conditioner website, then told her not to assume fraud after she paid 8,000 pesos

A woman who wanted to buy an air conditioner asked ChatGPT for help, according to a Milenio feature published on 2 October 2026. ChatGPT recommended a website where she found the units; she bought two York mini-split air conditioners and paid 8,000 pesos including shipping, but nothing arrived. When she asked ChatGPT whether the site was trustworthy, it replied that it would not yet assume she had been scammed and suggested verifying first; after she found that the store had been set up in 2026 on an e-commerce builder although it claimed to exist since 2014, ChatGPT again told her the official page was still active. She then contacted the brand by other means and confirmed it was a scam. Milenio quotes ChatGPT's replies from her account; no screenshot is described and no refund is reported.

Core concern Low reported severity Media Coverage

AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source · Added 27/10/2026

Cases may have several effects and sources. Mixed accounts qualify when they include a reported harm or adverse experience. People are counted within individual cases where sources support a number; we do not publish a collection-wide total of distinct people.

A source’s existence, the experience it reports and AI’s causal role are separate questions. A lawsuit records allegations unless a subsequent finding establishes them.

Methodology and corrections · Subscribe via RSS · Suggest a case or correction · Find support

Last dataset update: 27/10/2026. Dataset available under CC BY 4.0.