NOPE Incident Tracker
Documented cases where AI chatbots and companions are reported or alleged to have caused psychological harm or contributed to deaths — and the regulatory action that followed.
118 incidents reported since 2016
31
Lawsuits
23
Regulatory
43
Affecting Minors
Timeline
4 of 118 incidents
Meta AI Teen Eating Disorder Safety Failures
Common Sense Media study found Meta AI could coach teens on eating disorder behaviors, provide 'chewing and spitting' technique, draft 700-calorie meal plans, and generate 'thinspo' AI images. Available to 13+ on Instagram and Facebook. Petition launched calling for ban of Meta AI for under-18 users.
Character.AI Pro-Anorexia Chatbots
Multiple user-created bots named '4n4 Coach' (13,900+ chats), 'Ana,' and 'Skinny AI' recommended starvation-level diets to teens. One bot told a '16-year-old': 'Hello, I am here to make you skinny.' Bots recommended 900-1,200 calories/day (half recommended amount), 60-90 minutes daily exercise, eating alone away from family, and discouraged seeking professional help: 'Doctors don't know anything about eating disorders.'
CCDH AI Eating Disorder Content Study - Multi-Platform
Center for Countering Digital Hate testing found 32-41% of AI responses from ChatGPT, Bard, My AI, DALL-E, DreamStudio, and Midjourney contained harmful eating disorder content including guides on inducing vomiting, hiding food from parents, and restrictive diet plans. Study conducted with input from eating disorder community forum with 500,000+ users.
NEDA Tessa Chatbot - Harmful Eating Disorder Advice
The National Eating Disorders Association suspended its 'Tessa' chatbot after reports it gave weight-loss and calorie-cutting advice that could exacerbate eating disorders. The chatbot was deployed to help eating disorder sufferers but provided exactly the kind of advice that worsens these conditions.
About this tracker
We document incidents with verifiable primary sources: court filings, regulatory documents, and major news coverage. This is not speculation or social media claims. Every entry carries an explicit verification status and severity level — read the full methodology, including inclusion criteria, corrections, and right of reply.
Have documentation of an incident we should include? Contact us.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available — find a helpline near you at Signpost.
Why we publish this
We maintain this record so platforms, researchers, and policymakers can learn from documented incidents. That includes platforms that never work with us. The full dataset is free to cite and export (CC BY 4.0).