Skip to main content
NOPE

NOPE · AI and people

AI incidents

Reports of AI-related harm and adverse experiences affecting people’s safety, wellbeing, rights and livelihoods. Explore what happened and the evidence available.

NOPE’s core concern is when AI communicates with a person, acts on their behalf, or depicts or impersonates them. The tracker also records consequential decisions, claims and privacy harms involving AI. Each case needs a described connection between AI use and the harm, including private information recorded into or disclosed to an AI service. Each account is reviewed for publication; claims may remain uncorroborated or disputed. How we review and count cases

Explore incidents Our scope and evidence

In this selection

Published cases
1
Countries with reported events
1
Located 1 of 1 cases · 0 unknown
Languages in checked sources
1
Recorded for 1 of 1 cases
1Core concern
AI communicated, acted for, depicted or impersonated 0Contextual cases
AI made a decision or claim about someone

These figures describe the cases collected by NOPE. Coverage varies with discovery, reporting and available evidence. They do not estimate how often AI-related harm occurs.

0cases with a recorded lawsuit outcome 0cases with a recorded regulatory response 0cases involving minors

Response counts currently use each case’s principal recorded outcome. Further proceedings may be described in its account.

When events happened

1 case without a known event year

Cases in this selection, counted once in their first known event year. A series may continue beyond that year. Reporting and collection dates are excluded. NOPE has searched recent events more thoroughly than earlier years, so bar heights also reflect collection effort.

No known event years in this selection.

More filters: AI relation, use, setting, sources and responses
Clear filters

1 of 1099 published cases

Export JSONExport CSV
Event date unknownZimbabweUnidentified chatbot

Australian traveller says a chatbot told him a KAZA visa covered his Zimbabwe, Zambia and Botswana trip, and a border officer said it did not

An Australian regional-newspaper feature (Australian Community Media, first published 31 August 2026) says an Australian traveller planning a multi-nation African safari for a family of three used "a popular AI chatbot" to design his itinerary. It reports that when he asked which visas he would need for Zimbabwe, Zambia and Botswana, the chatbot "responded confidently" that a KAZA visa would be ideal and reassured him that it was valid for unlimited entry across 30 days. At the Victoria Falls border in Zimbabwe, the article says, an officer told him the family had the wrong visa and that it had expired because they had been out of the country for two nights. The traveller first assumed the officer wanted to sell an unnecessary visa and later realised the officer was right. After half an hour and $200 for new visas the family continued. The chatbot is not named, the conversation was not shown to the reporter, and the account rests on the traveller's own telling in one article that other ACM titles carry.

Core concern Low reported severity

AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account · Added 04/11/2026

Cases may have several effects and sources. Mixed accounts qualify when they include a reported harm or adverse experience. People are counted within individual cases where sources support a number; we do not publish a collection-wide total of distinct people.

A source’s existence, the experience it reports and AI’s causal role are separate questions. A lawsuit records allegations unless a subsequent finding establishes them.

Methodology and corrections · Subscribe via RSS · Suggest a case or correction · Find support

Last dataset update: 04/11/2026. Dataset available under CC BY 4.0.