Skip to main content
NOPE
Low reported severity Involving minors Internal Action

Utah: Meta AI's suggested prompts under a mother's Instagram video compiled her young daughters' names, birth details and old photos and her likely home location; Meta said the prompts 'missed the mark' and changed the feature

On 1 September 2026 Kalie Robins, a Utah travel creator, posted a short Instagram video of herself singing in the car with one of her daughters; it was also shown on Facebook. The next day she noticed Meta AI had placed suggested questions under the post, starting with 'Who's the child passenger?'. Clicking the prompts, she said, produced her two daughters' names, birth information, photos and videos drawn from her own and relatives' past posts, including a newborn photo from her mother's account and a picture she believed she had deleted years earlier, and a further prompt, 'Where does Kalie Robins live?', assembled older and newer posts into her likely location. Her 2 September reaction video drew more than 310,000 likes. Meta told reporters the prompts 'missed the mark', 'should never have been generated' and had been fixed, while saying the feature only surfaces information the user can already access; it disputed that a long-deleted photo was used, saying the photo had been deleted shortly before the video and remained briefly visible through a bug. Robins said Meta never contacted her and that the episode left her feeling she had 'failed' her children.

AI system
Meta AI
Occurred
2 Sept 2026
Reported
10 September 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Made a claim about the person
Reported harm
Psychological Distress
Whose AI use
Their own AI use · An institution’s AI use
Setting
Privacy · Everyday life · Relationships
Evidence
AI involvement supported · Causal attribution supported · 4 sources
3 claims: 2 corroborated, 1 disputed. 3 open questions
People reported harmed
3 people

AI system as recorded: Meta AI (suggested-question prompts under Instagram and Facebook posts, drawing on the user's and related accounts' content)

What Happened

Robins told CNET she 'did not understand posting separate innocent pieces of our lives over years could mean an AI could sit there and assemble all those breadcrumbs into information about my minor children in seconds'. According to her account, as reported by CNET, NewsNation, Futurism (relayed by the Toronto Sun) and Dexerto (relaying The Verge), the suggested prompts under her video included 'Who's the child passenger?' and 'Where does Kalie Robins live?'; clicking them returned her daughters' names, birth information, photos and videos from her own posts and from relatives' accounts, including a newborn photo posted years earlier by her mother, and connected older and newer posts to places she had lived, offering to pinpoint her location. She said one surfaced photo had not been on her page for years; Meta told CNET the photo had been deleted right before the video was made and a temporary bug kept it visible, which Robins disputes, suggesting a copy may have existed in Facebook group pages. Meta spokesperson Dina El-Kassaby told The Verge: 'While the content was available to this user, these prompts should never have been generated.' Meta said the feature was built to help people get more information about posts and that responses are based on information the user already has access to. Robins told NewsNation: 'It sucks feeling like I failed my kids at that moment ... It makes me sick still.' She has since changed how she shares her children online and called for accountability and clearer child-related safeguards. Meta has not detailed what changed or how often such prompts were generated for other users.

Reported harm

A mother experienced distress and a loss of control over her children's privacy after Meta AI's suggested prompts compiled her two young daughters' identifying details and her likely location from scattered family posts; Meta acknowledged the prompts should not have been generated and changed the feature.

Outcome

Resolved

2 September 2026: Robins posts a reaction video on Instagram. From about 10 September (Futurism, then Business Insider, CNET, NY Post, The Verge, NewsNation, Politico): Meta tells reporters the AI search feature 'missed the mark', that 'these prompts should never have been generated', and that it has 'fixed that issue' so Meta AI no longer suggests personal questions about people in posts; Meta disputes the deleted-photo detail. 10 September: Robins posts again asking what was fixed and what child-related safeguards exist. Robins told CNET and NewsNation that Meta never contacted her directly. No regulatory action is reported.

What remains unknown

  • What Meta changed and how many other users saw similar prompts about children is not disclosed.
  • Whether the compiled information was shown to anyone other than Robins is not established.
  • No regulator has announced an inquiry in the inspected sources.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: supported. Meta acknowledged to CNET and The Verge that its AI generated the suggested prompts and that they 'should never have been generated', and said it fixed the issue. The AI made claims about identified people (the children's identities and the mother's location) rather than conversing with them; the mother's clicks on the prompts are recorded as own_use, and the platform's default feature as institutional_use.

3 claims: 2 corroborated, 1 disputed. What the statuses mean

Corroborated Meta AI suggested prompts under Robins's 1 September car video including 'Who's the child passenger?' and 'Where does Kalie Robins live?', and clicking them produced her daughters' names, birth details, photos and videos from her own and relatives' posts, and assembled her likely location.

Causal attribution. Robins's account given in separate interviews to CNET, NewsNation and Futurism; Meta does not dispute that the prompts were generated.

  • cnet.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Meta AI posed a series of invasive prompts under the video, such as "Who's the child passenger?" and "Where does Kalie Robins live?"'; 'pulled information from her past posts ... including her location'; 'drew on other profiles, such as her mother's account'.
  • torontosun.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Who's the child passenger?'; 'their names, birth information, pictures and videos of them'; 'It pieced together my information to show people where I live'.
  • newsnationnow.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'suggested questions aimed at uncovering information about her children — including their names, birthdates, videos, newborn photos, even photos that had been deleted — and, ultimately, her live location'.
Corroborated Meta said the prompts 'missed the mark' and 'should never have been generated', that responses draw only on information the user can already access, and that it fixed the issue so Meta AI no longer suggests personal questions about people in posts.

Causal attribution. Meta statements to three outlets.

  • cnet.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'A Meta spokesperson told CNET in an email that it "fixed" the issue and that Meta AI will no longer suggest inappropriate, personal questions on users' posts'.
  • dexerto.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    '"While the content was available to this user, these prompts should never have been generated," Meta spokesperson Dina El-Kassaby said, according to The Verge'.
  • torontosun.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'its AI search feature "missed the mark"'; '"fixed that issue"'.
Disputed Robins says one surfaced photo had been deleted years earlier; Meta says the photo was deleted shortly before the video and remained briefly visible because of a temporary bug.

Causal attribution. Competing accounts from Robins and Meta reported by CNET.

  • cnet.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Meta also denied Robins' claim that its AI accessed a photo deleted years ago. Instead, Meta told CNET that the photo of Robins' kids was deleted right before the video was made and that a temporary bug briefly kept it visible. Robins disputed this'.

Sources

4 sources inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in English on 2026-09-18 (CNET, 12 Sep 2026). Direct interview with Robins plus Meta's emailed statement to CNET and its dispute of the deleted-photo detail. Applies to s1.

Read in English on 2026-09-18 via the MSN content API copy (NewsNation, 17 Sep 2026; the newsnationnow.com host returns 403 to this box). Interview with Robins including the distress quotation. Applies to s2.

Read in English on 2026-09-18 via the MSN content API copy (Toronto Sun, 15 Sep 2026). Relays Futurism's interview and Meta's statement to Futurism; treated as the Futurism chain. Applies to s3.

Read in English on 2026-09-18 (Dexerto, 12 Sep 2026). Relays The Verge's report of Meta spokesperson Dina El-Kassaby's statement; treated as The Verge chain. Applies to s4.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: Unknown.

Robins is described as a Utah mother (Toronto Sun/Futurism; TRT Haber); the posts and prompts occurred on her US Instagram/Facebook accounts. No court.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-18: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a privacy and made-claim-about case: an AI feature compiled identifying details about two young children and a named adult's location, the adult reported distress and loss of control, and the company acknowledged the prompts should not have been generated. Four sources across four reporting chains read; the children's details are not reproduced. Low severity.

People described

Kalie Robins, a Utah mother and travel creator who spoke publicly under her own name, and her two young daughters, whose names and details were compiled (not repeated here)

People reported harmed in this case

3 people

1 AI participant · 2 other people harmed

Kalie Robins (who used the prompts and reported distress) and her two daughters, whose identifying details were compiled. Exact count of three; her mother and other relatives whose posts were drawn on are not counted as harmed.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#meta-ai#instagram#facebook#privacy#children#profiling#suggested-prompts#united-states#utah

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Utah: Meta AI's suggested prompts under a mother's Instagram video compiled her young daughters' names, birth details and old photos and her likely home location; Meta said the prompts 'missed the mark' and changed the feature. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-utah-meta-ai-suggested-prompts-children-profile

BibTeX

@misc{2026_utah_meta_ai_suggested_prompts_children_profile,
  title = {Utah: Meta AI's suggested prompts under a mother's Instagram video compiled her young daughters' names, birth details and old photos and her likely home location; Meta said the prompts 'missed the mark' and changed the feature},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-utah-meta-ai-suggested-prompts-children-profile}
}

Related cases

Medium Unidentified facial recognition system

US: FTC says Rite Aid's facial recognition falsely matched shoppers to a watchlist, leading staff to search an 11-year-old girl and call police on a woman

In a complaint filed in federal court in Pennsylvania on 19 December 2023, the US Federal Trade Commission alleged that the pharmacy chain Rite Aid used facial recognition in its stores to match customers against a database of people it suspected of shoplifting or other wrongdoing, and that staff acted on the match alerts by following, searching, ejecting and publicly accusing customers and by calling the police. The FTC says many alerts were false positives: employees recorded thousands of false-positive alerts between December 2019 and July 2020, staff stopped and searched an 11-year-old girl on a false match, and employees called the police on a Black woman matched to an image of a white woman with blonde hair. Rite Aid agreed to a proposed order barring it from using facial recognition in retail stores for five years, without admitting or denying the allegations.

Low Meta AI (reported)

Ray-Ban Meta glasses owner says Meta AI stored recordings and transcripts of conversations captured without the wake word; Meta says the issue is resolved

In a Reddit post on 13 October 2026, an owner of Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses says the glasses captured conversations they were having with another person although they had not said the wake word "Hey Meta" and the setting for responding without it was turned off. The owner says the Meta AI app saved audio recordings and text transcripts of these conversations in their history, that Meta AI never answered, and that they saw the same behaviour on three pairs (second and third generation) after a recent firmware update. A screenshot attached to the post shows the app's voice activity log with stored entries dated 12 October. The owner says Meta Support advised turning off microphone and camera permissions, Wear Detection and automatic updates and deleting voice history, and later replied that recording continued with everything turned off. On 16 October 2026, after Meta's statement, the owner replied that a new update had been pushed to their glasses and the issue was unchanged. A Meta spokesperson told Android Authority, as relayed by Futurism, Ars Technica and Mashable, that the issue had been resolved. Ars Technica reports that Meta has not said what caused the recordings or how many glasses were affected, and that Android Authority could not reproduce the problem before Meta's statement. The owner says they cannot establish whether the recordings were sent to Meta's servers. On 19 October 2026 a California buyer filed a proposed class action against Meta in federal court (Subia v. Meta Platforms) alleging that Meta AI glasses recorded his conversations without the wake phrase, in violation of California's wiretapping law; the complaint quotes reporting of this owner's three-pairs account. Its allegations are unproven.

High Unidentified Google AI tool (reported)

Argentine activist reports threats after an alleged Google AI misidentification

On 26 August 2026, WhatsApp groups in Ceuta circulated videos and images claiming that Argentine political scientist and activist Flavia Broffoni — who was in Patagonia and had not been to Spain since 2014 — was a woman filmed in Ceuta allegedly giving pepper spray to Moroccan migrants. A screenshot from one group shows that a user cropped the woman's face from the video and asked a Google AI tool who she was, with the word 'activista' as context; the answer identified her as Flavia Broffoni with details of her public profile. Broffoni received death and rape threats. La Nación's own test with the same video produced a different false identification — a student from Quilmes, with her personal data. Google Argentina said it could not confirm the screenshot came from its systems without the original link and had received no formal report. Broffoni is weighing legal action with her lawyer.

Medium Unidentified image tool

Cookeville, Tennessee: two high-school students were charged with aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor after the sheriff's office said they used an AI program to turn photographs, including those of female classmates, into sexually explicit images and posted them; the mother of one depicted girl says her daughter shut herself in her room and stopped talking to friends

On 31 August 2026 the Putnam County Sheriff's Office was told of possible sharing of sexually explicit images at Cookeville High School. Detectives found that two male teenage students had used an artificial-intelligence program to turn photographs obtained online, in some cases photographs of fellow female students, into sexually explicit images, and had shared them; explicit images already stored on one phone were also shared. Both juveniles were taken to the Putnam County Juvenile Detention Center. One was charged with one count each of aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor and especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, the other with two counts of each. The district attorney told NewsChannel 5 on 21 September that the two would be prosecuted in juvenile court. The mother of one of the depicted girls told the station the episode was very hard on her daughter, who had made no naked photographs herself, locked herself in her room and would not talk to her, to anybody or to her friends. The sheriff's-office account and the school system's statement were carried by WZTV, WSMV and 3B Media News on 1-2 September; NewsChannel 5 added its own interviews with the sheriff, the district attorney and the mother on 21 September. The tool is not named. The juveniles are not named in any report.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents