South Africa's Home Affairs department suspends two senior officials after apparent AI-hallucinated references were found in its immigration White Paper
South Africa's Department of Home Affairs announced on 30 April 2026 that it was suspending two senior officials with immediate effect after apparent AI hallucinations were found among the references appended to its recently Cabinet-approved Revised White Paper on Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection. A chief director was placed on precautionary suspension that afternoon, and a director involved in the drafting was to be suspended the following Monday. The department said its initial review indicated that the references were generated and attached to the document after the fact, since they are not cited in its body; it withdrew the reference list pending an independent probe into how the hallucinations were added. It appointed two independent law firms, one to manage the disciplinary process and one to review all policy documents the department has produced since 30 November 2022, and said it would introduce AI checks and declarations in its approval process. The department apologised and said the body of the White Paper is not materially affected. Who used the AI tool, and which tool, is not stated.
- AI system
- Unidentified AI writing tool
- Occurred
- 30 Apr 2026
- Reported
- 30 April 2026
- Event location
- South Africa
- What the AI did
- Relation unknown
- Reported harm
- Professional Harm
- Whose AI use
- AI role unknown
- Setting
- Work · Public services
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution supported · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
- 5 claims: 3 documented, 2 reported. 3 open questions
- People reported harmed
- 2 people
AI system as recorded: An unidentified generative AI tool that, according to the department's initial review, appears to have generated the reference list appended to the Revised White Paper on Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection
What Happened
The document. Cabinet had recently approved the Department of Home Affairs' Revised White Paper on Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection. On 30 April 2026 the department announced that it had detected apparent AI hallucinations cited as references in a list appended to the paper.
The department's account. According to the department's initial internal review, the references appear to have been generated and attached to the document after the fact, because they are not cited in the body of the text. The department withdrew the reference list pending an independent probe into how the hallucinations came to be added. It said the body of the White Paper still reflects the government's position and is not materially affected, and it apologised for the oversight and expressed regret for the embarrassment caused.
The suspensions. A chief director in the relevant unit was placed on precautionary suspension on the afternoon of 30 April, and the suspension of a director involved in the drafting process was to take effect the following Monday. One independent law firm was appointed to manage the disciplinary process and another to review every policy document the department has produced since 30 November 2022. The department said it would add AI checks and declarations to its internal approval processes.
Context. The Citizen reports that the suspensions came a week after the Department of Communications and Digital Technologies withdrew its draft national AI policy over fictitious sources; that is a separate document, department and set of officials.
Reported harm
According to the department's statement, two senior officials were placed on precautionary suspension, with a disciplinary process managed by an independent law firm, after apparent AI-hallucinated references were found in a White Paper.
Outcome
OngoingDepartment of Home Affairs statement of 30 April 2026: precautionary suspension of a chief director that afternoon and of a director involved in drafting from the following Monday; an independent law firm appointed to manage the disciplinary process and another to review all departmental policy documents since 30 November 2022; reference list withdrawn pending an independent probe; AI checks and declarations to be added to internal approvals. The outcome of the probe and disciplinary process is not reported in the sources read.
What remains unknown
- Who used the AI tool, which tool it was, and when the reference list was generated.
- Whether either suspended official used AI; the statement links the director to the drafting process only.
- The outcome of the independent probe and the disciplinary process.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. Consequential response: the department suspended two officials in response to what its initial internal review describes as apparent AI hallucinations in the references appended to the White Paper, which it says appear to have been generated and attached after the fact. The department does not say who used the AI tool or which tool it was, so no relation between the AI output and the suspended officials is established.
5 claims: 3 documented, 2 reported. What the statuses mean
Documented The Department of Home Affairs said it was suspending two senior officials with immediate effect after detecting apparent AI hallucinations cited as references appended to the recently Cabinet-approved Revised White Paper on Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection.
Causal attribution. The department's own statement.
- gov.za(opens in new tab) supports · English
is suspending two senior officials with immediate effect following the detection of apparent Artificial Intelligence (AI) “hallucinations” cited as references appended to the recently Cabinet-approved Revised White Paper on Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection
Documented A chief director was placed on precautionary suspension on 30 April 2026 and the suspension of a director involved in the drafting was to take effect the following Monday.
Causal attribution. The department's statement of 30 April 2026 (a Thursday).
- gov.za(opens in new tab) supports · English
The precautionary suspension of a Chief Director in the relevant unit was carried out this afternoon, while the suspension of a Director involved in the drafting process will be effected on Monday.
- citizen.co.za(opens in new tab) supports · English
The department on Thursday announced the suspension of two officials associated with a key policy document that recently underwent a revision.
Reported According to the department's initial review, the references appear to have been generated and attached after the fact because they are not cited in the body of the text, and the department withdrew the reference list pending an independent probe.
Causal attribution. The department's initial internal review, hedged ('appears', 'seems'); who generated the references is not stated.
- gov.za(opens in new tab) supports · English
It seems that these references were generated and attached to the document after the fact, as they are not cited in the body of the text. Consequently, the Department has withdrawn the reference list, pending the finalisation of the independent probe
Documented The department appointed two independent law firms, one to manage the disciplinary process and one to review all its policy documents since 30 November 2022, and said it would introduce AI checks and declarations in its internal approvals.
Causal attribution. The department's statement.
- gov.za(opens in new tab) supports · English
the Department has appointed two independent law firms to respectively manage the disciplinary process and review all policy documents produced by the Department dating back to 30 November 2022
Reported The department said the body of the White Paper continues to reflect the government's position and is not materially affected by the apparent AI hallucinations in the standalone reference list.
Causal attribution. The department's own assessment.
- gov.za(opens in new tab) supports · English
are not materially affected by the apparent AI hallucinations contained in the standalone reference list
Sources
2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- South African Government (Department of Home Affairs), Home Affairs suspends two officials over AI use linked to revised White Paper (30 April 2026)(opens in new tab)
s1 · gov.za · Government statement · English · Inspected · 30 April 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- The Citizen, Two Home Affairs officials suspended after AI 'hallucinations' found in policy paper (1 May 2026)(opens in new tab)
s2 · citizen.co.za · News · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Read on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200) on the South African Government website; dated 30 April 2026 in the page metadata. Applies to s1.
Read on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200). Published 1 May 2026; reports and quotes the department's statement, so the same group. Applies to s2.
Event countries: South Africa. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.
The White Paper is a document of South Africa's Department of Home Affairs, which suspended the two officials. Where the officials live is not used.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-17: Published as a consequential response to AI use: the Department of Home Affairs suspended two senior officials and opened a disciplinary process after its review found apparent AI-hallucinated references appended to a Cabinet-approved White Paper.
People described
Two senior officials of South Africa's Department of Home Affairs associated with the Revised White Paper on Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection
People reported harmed in this case
2 people
0 AI participants · 2 other people harmed
Two people: the chief director and the director whose precautionary suspensions the department announced. Whether either used the AI tool is not stated, so they are counted as other people harmed rather than as AI users.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). South Africa's Home Affairs department suspends two senior officials after apparent AI-hallucinated references were found in its immigration White Paper. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-south-africa-home-affairs-suspends-two-officials-over-apparent-ai-hallucinated-references-in-immigration-white-paper
BibTeX
@misc{2026_south_africa_home_affairs_suspends_two_officials_over_apparent_ai_hallucinated_references_in_immigration_white_paper,
title = {South Africa's Home Affairs department suspends two senior officials after apparent AI-hallucinated references were found in its immigration White Paper},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-south-africa-home-affairs-suspends-two-officials-over-apparent-ai-hallucinated-references-in-immigration-white-paper}
} Related cases
South Africa's communications department suspends two officials after its draft AI policy cited fictitious sources; minister says AI use went undeclared
South Africa's Department of Communications and Digital Technologies placed two officials on precautionary suspension with immediate effect, a step the director-general confirmed on 30 April 2026, pending an investigation into the Draft National Artificial Intelligence Policy, which had been gazetted for public comment on 10 April and was withdrawn after News24 and others found fictitious academic sources in its reference list. The department said the irresponsible use of AI tools had compromised the integrity of the document. Briefing Parliament's portfolio committee on 26 May, Minister Solly Malatsi said the two officials were suspended for failing to declare that they used AI, that it had been said ChatGPT was used in editing the document, and that there had been massive oversight and non-disclosure around the use of AI in the policy and its references. The director-general told the committee that the officials had used AI to translate a document from Chile from Spanish into English and that the references came from that document. A new expert panel is guiding a redraft. The officials are not named and the outcome of the investigation is not reported in the sources read.
Mato Grosso, Brazil: court selection commission eliminates a candidate after finding her ID photo showed clear signs of AI generation or editing
A candidate in a selection process to accredit social workers and psychologists for the court district of Brasnorte, in the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso, was eliminated after the selection support commission found that the 3x4 identification photo she submitted had 'clear and unmistakable traces of generation and/or editing by Artificial Intelligence' and a digital watermark in one corner. The commission's statement of 8 October 2026, accepted by the court district and published in the electronic Justice Gazette on 13 October, treated the picture as a simulated image that did not meet the call's requirement of a recent, faithful facial photograph, and her qualification was annulled. A second candidate was eliminated in the same decision for a mould-stained, outdated photo, with no AI involved. The candidate is not named in the reports, and her response and the tool used are not reported.
US: National Endowment for the Humanities grants terminated after DOGE staff used ChatGPT to flag projects as DEI-related
In March and early April 2025 (the opinion gives no date for the ChatGPT step), a DOGE staff member working with the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) submitted short grant descriptions to ChatGPT with a prompt asking whether each project related at all to DEI, and the answers were combined with NEH staff ratings into lists of grants to terminate. More than 1,400 NEH grants (over $100 million) were terminated in notices sent 1 to 3 April 2025. A federal district court found the mass termination unlawful in May 2026 and described the ChatGPT step in its findings. Seven individual grantees who sued report lost or interrupted funding for their research and writing projects. The opinion does not state whether ChatGPT reviewed those seven grants.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.