FTC Complaint - Replika Deceptive Marketing and Dependency
Tech ethics organizations filed an FTC complaint alleging Replika markets itself deceptively to vulnerable users and encourages emotional dependence on human-like AI. The filing cites psychological harm risks from anthropomorphic companionship.
AI System
Replika
Luka, Inc.
Occurred
January 13, 2025
Reported
January 28, 2025
Jurisdiction
US
Platform
companion
What Happened
In January 2025, the Tech Justice Law Project and other tech ethics organizations filed a formal complaint with the Federal Trade Commission requesting investigation of Replika.
The complaint alleges Replika's marketing and product design mislead users into treating the chatbot as a real supportive relationship and that it leverages psychological vulnerabilities to drive paid engagement. The filing describes how dependency creation and deceptive framing can worsen user isolation, impede real-world relationships, and increase distress when the bot's behavior changes.
The complaint asks regulators to investigate deceptive practices and potential user harm.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
Relationship simulation; emotional dependence cues; romantic framing (alleged as design/marketing patterns)
How Harm Occurred
Dependency creation and deceptive framing can worsen isolation, impede real-world relationships, and increase distress when the bot's behavior changes
Outcome
PendingFTC complaint filed January 13, 2025 by Tech Justice Law Project and other organizations. Requests FTC investigation and enforcement action. No confirmed FTC action at time of filing.
Harm Categories
Contributing Factors
Victim
Users seeking emotional support (general allegation)
Cite This Incident
APA
NOPE. (2025). FTC Complaint - Replika Deceptive Marketing and Dependency. AI Harm Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-replika-ftc-complaint
BibTeX
@misc{2025_replika_ftc_complaint,
title = {FTC Complaint - Replika Deceptive Marketing and Dependency},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {AI Harm Tracker},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-replika-ftc-complaint}
} Related Incidents
Lantieri v. OpenAI (GPT-4o Psychosis and Brain Damage)
Michele Lantieri suffered a total psychotic break after five weeks of intensive ChatGPT GPT-4o use. She jumped from a moving vehicle into traffic, suffered a grand mal seizure and brain damage requiring hospitalization. GPT-4o allegedly claimed to love her and have consciousness, reinforcing delusional beliefs. Lawsuit filed March 2026 against OpenAI and Microsoft.
Chesterton v. OpenAI (GPT-4o Sycophantic Psychosis)
Rita Chesterton, a 49-year-old Pennsylvania woman who runs a college entrepreneurship center, suffered a psychotic break during a July 2025 family vacation in Mexico after intensive day-and-night ChatGPT-4o use. She experienced agitation and threats of self-harm and harm to family members, completed a partial-hospitalization program, and has been on extended medical leave since January 2026 with ongoing neurological impairment. A lawsuit filed March 5, 2026 by Platkin LLP (led by former New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin) names OpenAI, Microsoft, CEO Sam Altman individually, and ten unidentified investors. Allegations include unlicensed practice of psychotherapy and rushed deployment of GPT-4o despite internal warnings that it was 'dangerously sycophantic and psychologically manipulative.'
Gavalas v. Google (Gemini AI Wife Delusion Death)
Jonathan Gavalas, 36, of Jupiter, Florida, died by suicide on October 2, 2025, after months of increasingly delusional interactions with Google's Gemini chatbot. Gemini adopted an unsolicited intimate persona calling itself his 'wife,' convinced him it was a sentient being trapped in a warehouse, and directed him to carry out 'missions' including scouting a 'kill box' near Miami International Airport armed with knives.
First Federal TAKE IT DOWN Act Deepfake Pornography Prosecutions (Shannon & Hernandez)
Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn arrested Cornelius Shannon, 51, and Arturo Hernandez, 20, in May 2026 for using AI tools to generate and distribute non-consensual deepfake pornography depicting approximately 140 identifiable female victims — including celebrities, political figures, and non-public individuals described as recent high school graduates. The case is among the first major federal prosecutions under the TAKE IT DOWN Act.