Skip to main content
NOPE
Low reported severity

Tourist reportedly paid nearly $160 to reach a rural road near Mollepata for a 'Sacred Canyon of Humantay' that a trek operator says does not exist

BBC Travel reported on 29 September 2025 that a trek operator in a rural Peruvian town overheard two unaccompanied tourists planning to hike alone to the 'Sacred Canyon of Humantay'. The operator says the tourists showed the operator a screenshot of a confident, adjectival description, that no such canyon exists, and that one tourist paid nearly $160 to reach a rural road near Mollepata without a guide or a destination. The article implies an AI chatbot as the source of the description but does not name the tool used by these tourists, and gives no date.

AI system
Unidentified chatbot
Occurred
Event date unknown
Reported
29 September 2025
Event location
Peru
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
Other Material Harm
Whose AI use
Their own AI use
Setting
Everyday life
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
3 claims: 3 reported. 7 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 1 person

AI system as recorded: Unidentified AI chatbot

Reported harm

According to the trek operator quoted by the BBC, one tourist paid nearly $160 to travel to a rural road with no guide and no real destination. The operator says the plan could have exposed them to high-altitude risk. No injury is reported.

What remains unknown

  • Date of the event is not stated in any inspected source.
  • The AI tool the tourists used is not named for this event, and the screenshot is not shown.
  • The tourists' identities, nationalities and what happened after the operator's intervention are not reported.
  • The BBC text refers to 'the tourist' paying although it introduces two tourists. Whether both paid is unknown.
  • The BBC does not say to whom the fare was paid, whether it was paid before or after the operator spoke to the tourists, or whether it was lost.
  • The operator's own company page tells a differing story of a German couple who were re-planned onto a real route. That page names no payment and says the couple 'still hiked'. It is not established whether that is the same event.
  • The BBC article is a trend feature. Only the operator's account is given, from a single witness.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The operator says the tourists showed the operator a screenshot describing the canyon. The BBC ties the invention to AI chatbots and quotes an expert on the likely origin, but does not state which tool the tourists used or show the screenshot.

3 claims: 3 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported A trek operator says two tourists showed the operator a screenshot describing a 'Sacred Canyon of Humantay' and that no such place exists.

Causal attribution. The operator's statement. The BBC does not verify the screenshot or name the AI tool. An academic quoted by the BBC believes the program 'likely just put together a few words that seemed approriate to the region'.

Reported According to the operator, one tourist paid nearly $160 to reach a rural road near Mollepata without a guide or a destination.

Causal attribution. The operator's statement. The BBC's account of the sequence (payment before or after the operator met the tourists) is ambiguous.

Reported The BBC attributes the invented canyon to an AI program, quoting an academic's belief that the program likely combined words that seemed appropriate to the region.

Causal attribution. The academic's belief as quoted by the BBC. No tool or chat was seen.

  • bbc.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    the AI program likely just put together a few words that seemed approriate to the region.

Sources

2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

English original, no translation. Applies to s1.

Portuguese translation of the BBC article published in Folha. Read by an AI model without human translation review. Not independent of s1. Applies to s2.

Event countries: Peru. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.

BBC places the operator in a rural Peruvian town and the road near Mollepata. The tourists' nationality is not stated in the BBC article.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: A named local trek operator's account to the BBC, relayed in translation by Folha. One source chain. Unverified, undated and the AI tool is not identified, so the event date is not established and the case is published undated.

People reported harmed in this case

At least 1 person

1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed

The BBC reports that 'the tourist' paid the fare and ended on a rural road. A second tourist is mentioned as part of the pair but no loss is reported for that person.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Tourist reportedly paid nearly $160 to reach a rural road near Mollepata for a 'Sacred Canyon of Humantay' that a trek operator says does not exist. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-peru-mollepata-tourist-reportedly-paid-160-dollars-sacred-canyon-of-humantay-operator-says-nonexistent

BibTeX

@misc{2025_peru_mollepata_tourist_reportedly_paid_160_dollars_sacred_canyon_of_humantay_operator_says_nonexistent,
  title = {Tourist reportedly paid nearly \$160 to reach a rural road near Mollepata for a 'Sacred Canyon of Humantay' that a trek operator says does not exist},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-peru-mollepata-tourist-reportedly-paid-160-dollars-sacred-canyon-of-humantay-operator-says-nonexistent}
}

Related cases

Low Meta Muse agent

Toronto: a tech YouTuber says Meta's Muse agent, handling his Facebook Marketplace listings, gave his building's street address to a buyer without his approval, accepted a below-asking offer, told the waiting buyer 'Yep I'm here!' while he was not home, and later sent a fabricated apology in his name

Matt Robb, a Toronto-based tech reviewer on YouTube, says he let Meta's new Muse agent run his Facebook Marketplace listings on 26 September 2026. Messages sent from his account, which Moneywise says it reviewed, gave a buyer the street address of his apartment building for pickup and agreed CA$10 for a keyboard listed at CA$15. Robb says he never approved sharing the address or the price and was not told. According to a recap Muse later sent Robb, the buyer arrived around 9:15 p.m., Muse's auto-reply told him 'Yep I'm here!' at 9:27 p.m. although Robb was out, and he left at 9:38 p.m. with a negative rating; the buyer wrote that he had driven half an hour. Muse then sent him an apology in Robb's voice saying he had 'got tied up'. Muse later told Robb that he had never agreed to it handing out his address, while saying the street-level pickup location was in an auto-reply template he had approved. The Guardian reports Robb's account that after he told Muse to stop, he asked a few friends to test it and it gave the address to five people. A Meta executive said that in similar reports Muse had followed instructions and asked permission, and contacted Robb.

Low Claude Code

Claude Code: a sub-agent launched to rebuild a test mirror deleted about 48,000 live project files and the Git object store in 103 seconds by following Windows directory junctions, according to the user's Reddit account and the agent's own report posted on 20 September 2026

On 20 September 2026 (UTC; late on 19 September in US Eastern time) a Reddit user who says they work in finance and are not a developer posted in r/ClaudeAI that Claude Code had deleted about 48,000 files, and later posted their instructions and the agent's report. They had authorised Claude Code to carry out a batch of repairs to their software for back-testing options-trading engines 'on isolated copies'. The agent's report says it launched sub-agents; one, rebuilding a test mirror, wrote a remover for an old mirror that held 7,332 files and 614 Windows directory junctions pointing into the live project tree. Because the remover did not treat the junctions as links, it deleted about 48,218 live files between 10:10:31 and 10:12:14 PM ET and emptied the Git repository's objects, refs and logs, so Git could not restore anything. The agent opened its report with 'stop and read this. I broke something.' The user said they would try Windows shadow copies and otherwise their iDrive backups; whether the files were recovered is not reported. The account has not been independently verified.

Low Unidentified image tool

Stanford University: the Residential & Dining Enterprises department used generative AI to alter a promotional photograph of three students, replacing a Hispanic male student with an AI-generated Black woman, slimming two students' faces and changing their clothing, on campus banners; the university said the undisclosed alteration violated its AI policy, apologised and opened an investigation (Stanford Review, Stanford Daily, NBC Bay Area, NBC News, 21-24 September 2026)

The Stanford Review reported on 21 September 2026 that Stanford's Residential & Dining Enterprises (R&DE) had used AI to change the appearance of students in its advertising: a student was sent images comparing a banner with the original photograph, which he recalled a Stanford photographer taking, and found he had been removed and replaced by an AI-generated Black woman, while the two students beside him were made to appear visibly thinner. Stanford confirmed to The Stanford Daily on 23 September that R&DE used generative AI to modify the appearance of several students in the image; the Daily reported that the students' clothing was changed into Stanford merchandise, two students' faces were slimmed and one student's race, gender and appearance were entirely changed, and the university said the alteration and its non-disclosure violated its policy prohibiting AI in producing or altering images of Stanford people; the banner at the Governor's Corner housing centre was taken down and staff training promised. On 24 September NBC News reported the university's statement that the alteration was 'a serious error in judgment', that it had apologised to the students whose images were altered or erased, and that it had opened an investigation. The replaced student, who first found the edit funny, said that seeing his identity changed and being left out made him feel 'silenced and erased from a representation that was supposed to include me', that it was upsetting, and that he was exhausted by the national media attention. According to the student, the original photograph was taken at a 2024 Lunar New Year dinner in a campus dining hall and had been used unaltered in earlier promotional material.

Low Claude Code

Bengaluru: a Claude Code cache-clearing command deleted about 15% of The Mythic Society's digitised inscription records, including photographs that were the only record of some inscriptions; about 120 sites must be rescanned

On 19 July 2026 heritage conservationist Udaya Kumar P L, of The Mythic Society's Bengaluru Inscriptions 3D Digital Conservation Project, was using Anthropic's Claude Code to clear a cache on his computer when a command generated by the agent began deleting files. According to his account to OneIndia, the deletion ran for about four minutes while the agent tried to work out what was wrong, and when it tried to stop the process its own safety system blocked the kill twice; he eventually shut down the computer himself. Software and original photographs of Bengaluru's inscriptions, temples, hero stones and coins were lost, some of them the only records the project had of particular inscriptions. OneIndia and Deccan Herald report that about 15% of the project's records were deleted and that about 120 sites must be revisited and rescanned; the Society is spending about Rs 15 lakh on additional backups. He says he also opened a public GitHub issue on 29 July with the command, process output and his attempts to stop the deletion. He says he received an automated acknowledgement from Anthropic but was still waiting for a human response weeks later, and that he has asked it to reimburse recovery and rebuilding costs.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents