Skip to main content
NOPE
Low reported severity

Maine school district reports teacher targeted by fabricated AI videos and photos

A Maine school superintendent told families that a teacher had been targeted by a malicious digital attack using AI-created videos and photos. The letter, reproduced by WABI, said the content falsely portrayed the teacher and had circulated online, with a small number of students possibly accessing or sharing it. The district said the hosting account had been reported and the video taken down, and offered support to the teacher. The first creation date and specific content are unknown.

AI system
Unidentified image and video tool
Unknown
Occurred
Event date unknown
Reported
22 April 2025
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Reputational HarmExploitation or Abuse
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Education · Work · Privacy
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source
3 claims: 3 reported. 2 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 1 person

AI system as recorded: Unspecified AI-generated impersonation videos and photos

What Happened

A Maine school superintendent told families that a teacher had been targeted by a malicious digital attack using AI-created videos and photos. The letter, reproduced by WABI, said the content falsely portrayed the teacher and had circulated online, with a small number of students possibly accessing or sharing it. The district said the hosting account had been reported and the video taken down, and offered support to the teacher. The first creation date and specific content are unknown.

Reported harm

The superintendent described one teacher as the target of malicious digital impersonation and online harassment. The source does not report a separate medical, employment or financial consequence.

What remains unknown

  • The first event date, creator and AI tool are unknown.
  • The teacher's personal account and any separate employment, medical or financial effects are not reported.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The reproduced superintendent letter directly attributes fabricated videos and photos of the teacher to AI technology. No imagery or investigation record was inspected.

3 claims: 3 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported The superintendent said fabricated videos and photos of a teaching staff member were created using AI and circulated online.

Causal attribution. WABI reproduces one superintendent letter. School statements remain reported and are not independent corroboration of the underlying creation method.

Reported The district described the teacher as a victim of digital impersonation and harassment, and said the content was false.

Causal attribution. WABI reproduces one superintendent letter. School statements remain reported and are not independent corroboration of the underlying creation method.

  • wabi.tv(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Article body, retained text line 92: paragraph about malicious targeting and online circulation.
  • wabi.tv(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Article body, retained text line 95: paragraph about malicious targeting and online circulation.
Reported The letter said the online account hosting the video had been reported and the video taken down.

Causal attribution. WABI reproduces one superintendent letter. School statements remain reported and are not independent corroboration of the underlying creation method.

Sources

1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: Unknown.

The school district is expressly identified as the Orrington-area Maine district, and the target is a member of its teaching staff.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-30: A reproduced school letter describes a specific AI impersonation attack on one teacher. The target and school are anonymized in public prose, and the record avoids unsupported imagery descriptions or clinical effects. The event is undated.

People reported harmed in this case

At least 1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

The superintendent's letter identifies one teaching staff member as the target. Students who may have viewed the material are not counted as harmed.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Maine school district reports teacher targeted by fabricated AI videos and photos. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-orrington-teacher-reported-ai-impersonation-harassment

BibTeX

@misc{2025_orrington_teacher_reported_ai_impersonation_harassment,
  title = {Maine school district reports teacher targeted by fabricated AI videos and photos},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-orrington-teacher-reported-ai-impersonation-harassment}
}

Related cases

High Unidentified image and video tool

New York: the Manhattan District Attorney seized 12 websites selling AI-generated sexual deepfakes of about 1,200 real people

On 14 September 2026 Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced the seizure of 12 domain names used to disseminate, publish and sell non-consensual AI-generated sexual 'deepfake' videos. His office said individuals under investigation had used AI image- and video-creation tools to turn photos and videos of approximately 1,200 real people, overwhelmingly women, into hyper-realistic sexual imagery without consent. The victims included actors, politicians, athletes, musicians, activists and social-media influencers. WIRED and outside researchers reported that many videos reposted content from the defunct MrDeepFakes platform and that dozens of politicians appeared on the sites; investigations into who ran them are ongoing.

High Unidentified image and video tool

Solo and Semarang, Indonesia: a university student's face was composited with AI onto pornographic images and a video by her ex-boyfriend and posted online; the suspect was detained after a nearly seven-month investigation

A female student at a state university in Solo (Surakarta), Central Java, learned on 1 January 2026 from friends that her face had been composited onto pornographic images and a video, which her lawyer said were found on Instagram and Telegram. Her family reported the case to the Central Java regional police cyber directorate on 28 January 2026. Police issued a formal police report on 31 July, arrested her ex-boyfriend, a university student in Semarang, at his boarding house in Gunungpati on 4 August 2026, and detained him. The police spokesman said the suspect used AI to place the complainant's face on another woman's naked body so that she appeared in pornographic content, uploaded it to his X account, did not sell it, and acted out of resentment after an on-and-off relationship ended. He faces charges under Articles 51 and 35 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and an article printed by two outlets as 'Law No. 1 of 2026', with a maximum of 12 years' imprisonment. Her lawyer said she could not sleep, withdrew, felt shame and at one point lost hope, that his team had found seven women in total allegedly targeted of whom six had not reported, and that the suspect's parents asked for an out-of-court settlement; police said only one complainant was confirmed.

High Unidentified image and video tool

Brooklyn: federal prosecutors unsealed complaints on 20 May 2026 charging two unconnected men, of New Jersey and Texas, under the TAKE IT DOWN Act with publishing AI deepfake pornography of about 90 women and about 50 identifiable women (actresses, singers, political figures and, in one case, non-public women) since May 2025; among the earliest federal prosecutions under the 2025 law

On 20 May 2026 the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York unsealed two criminal complaints (docket numbers 26-MJ-96 and 26-MJ-97) charging Cornelius Shannon, 51, of Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey, and Arturo Hernandez, 20, of Bedias, Texas, with violating the TAKE IT DOWN Act, the federal law enacted on 19 May 2025 that prohibits the non-consensual publication of intimate images including AI-generated digital forgeries. The two were arrested the same day in unconnected cases. Prosecutors allege that since 19 May 2025 Shannon published at least 360 albums of AI deepfake pornography on an adult image- and video-sharing platform depicting approximately 90 different women, viewed millions of times, and that Hernandez published approximately 113 albums on a website depicting approximately 50 identifiable women, including individuals who are not public figures, in which non-explicit images morph into sexually explicit deepfakes, viewed nearly a million times. The victims included actresses, singers and political figures; TIME and TechTimes report, citing the complaint, that Hernandez's victims also included recent high-school graduates. Each defendant faces up to two years' imprisonment if convicted; the charges are allegations.

High Unidentified image and video tool

Cileungsi, Bogor Regency, Indonesia: photographs of private-school pupils taken from social media were turned into AI pornographic images and videos, reportedly since 2025; three pupils have filed a joint police report, the victims' lawyer says hundreds were affected, and two former pupils are named as suspects

Bogor Regency police confirmed on 18 September 2026 that they are investigating a report that pupils of a private school in Cileungsi had their faces edited with artificial intelligence into pornographic content. The head of the women-and-children unit told Kumparan that so far three pupils had reported in a single police report, that the case began when a victim heard from a friend that someone was making content with their face using AI technology, and that investigators were still establishing who made the content and which program was used, under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. A lawyer for the witnesses, quoted by Pojok Bogor and Uzone, says the victims number in the hundreds; that two former pupils, one as initiator and one as maker, have been reported and admitted the acts to witnesses; that police found thousands of suspected AI-manipulated photos and videos on a suspect's phone, some uploaded to websites including an online-gambling site; and that the case, reported on 19 May 2026, is believed to have run since 2025 while all involved were still pupils, some victims now being university students. Police say the case is at an early stage and asked the public not to draw conclusions.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents