Skip to main content
NOPE
Low reported severity

Mochi Kids owner reports unwanted Amazon AI-agent orders and partner distrust

Mochi Kids' owner told Modern Retail that she received about sixteen Buy for Me orders from November 2025, fulfilling some before discovering their Amazon origin. She said she had chosen to avoid Amazon and subsequently cancelled orders. A wholesale partner that prohibited Amazon sales contacted her after finding its products listed, and she had to explain she had not intentionally listed them. She described distrust. Amazon says its AI purchasing service supports an email opt-out; the source establishes no net financial loss.

AI system
Amazon Buy for Me
Amazon
Occurred
Nov 2025
Reported
6 January 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Relation unknown
Reported harm
Professional HarmLoss of Autonomy
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Work · Finance
Evidence
AI involvement supported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources
4 claims: 1 documented, 3 reported. 2 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 1 person

AI system as recorded: Amazon Buy for Me shopping agent

What Happened

Mochi Kids' owner told Modern Retail that she received about sixteen Buy for Me orders from November 2025, fulfilling some before discovering their Amazon origin. She said she had chosen to avoid Amazon and subsequently cancelled orders. A wholesale partner that prohibited Amazon sales contacted her after finding its products listed, and she had to explain she had not intentionally listed them. She described distrust. Amazon says its AI purchasing service supports an email opt-out; the source establishes no net financial loss.

Reported harm

Owner-reported unwanted agent orders, cancellation work and a strained wholesale relationship

What remains unknown

  • The exact first order day, cost of cancellations and final opt-out outcome are unknown.
  • No actual breach penalty, lost contract or net financial loss is established. The agent acted for shoppers, with no supported listed relation to the harmed owner.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: supported. The official description establishes Buy for Me's AI-agent purchasing function, and the owner reports actual orders. The article does not establish that every catalogue-listing step used AI.

4 claims: 1 documented, 3 reported. What the statuses mean

Documented Amazon states that Buy for Me uses AI to complete purchases on customers' behalf at brand websites.

Causal attribution. The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group.

Reported The owner said Buy for Me orders began in November 2025, some were fulfilled before discovery, and she later cancelled orders.

Causal attribution. The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group.

Reported A wholesale partner challenged the Amazon listings, and the owner said she had to reassure it and described distrust.

Causal attribution. The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group.

Reported The owner said she had intentionally avoided selling on Amazon and found the unexpected catalogue listings frustrating.

Causal attribution. The inspected reporting describes this account. Claims remain attributed and causation is alleged; multiple reports of the same victim or police/court account are one independence group.

Sources

2 sources inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: Unknown.

The owner and business are explicitly based in Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-30: An inspected source describes a concrete person-level adverse experience connected to the specified AI use. Statements remain attributed, private identities are minimized, and unknown dates, counts and technical details are preserved.

People reported harmed in this case

At least 1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One interviewed owner describes the adverse business experience. Sixteen orders and 4,000 products are not harmed-person counts; the unnamed partner is not separately counted.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Mochi Kids owner reports unwanted Amazon AI-agent orders and partner distrust. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-mochi-owner-reports-amazon-buy-for-me-orders-partner-distrust

BibTeX

@misc{2025_mochi_owner_reports_amazon_buy_for_me_orders_partner_distrust,
  title = {Mochi Kids owner reports unwanted Amazon AI-agent orders and partner distrust},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-mochi-owner-reports-amazon-buy-for-me-orders-partner-distrust}
}

Related cases

Low Amazon Buy for Me

Bobo Design Studio owner reports unwanted Amazon AI-agent orders and refunds

Bobo Design Studio's owner told Modern Retail that Amazon's Buy for Me service exposed her catalogue and placed orders through her Shopify store without her opting in. In late December 2025 she discovered orders for unavailable or removed products and cancelled purchases and issued refunds. She described loss of control and pursued an opt-out. Amazon says Buy for Me uses AI agents to place purchases for customers and says businesses can opt out. The source of an incorrect product image is unknown; it is not attributed to AI generation.

High Unidentified facial recognition system

Jacksonville, Florida: a 38-year-old father was arrested at work in May 2025 and charged with soliciting a child after sheriff's investigators identified him, he says with facial-recognition tools, from photos an impostor had sent to an undercover officer; charges were dropped in August 2025 after the real sender confessed, and the family says the ordeal cost $45,000

The Florida Trib (28 September 2026, republished by the Florida Phoenix) reports that in May 2025, during the multi-agency sting Operation Rescue Our Children, a man using the Skout dating app sent an undercover officer posing as a 13-year-old girl two photos of someone else: a former friend, a supermarket assistant manager and father of two whom the Trib calls 'Nick'. Investigators told him they relied on facial-recognition tools to identify him in the pictures, he recalled, and the Trib found no indication in court documents of other investigative work before his arrest. He was handcuffed at work, charged with soliciting a child via computer and unlawful use of a two-way communications device, spent a night in jail, wore an ankle monitor, was barred from contact with his two young children for a month and a half and could not live at home for nearly three months. The account's owner, a man with a prior conviction for the same offence, admitted on 31 July 2025 using the photos; charges against the father were dropped the next day and a judge ordered the case expunged on 4 August 2025, though the records stayed publicly online for more than a year. The family says the ordeal cost $45,000 in lost wages and legal fees and traumatised the children. The sheriff's office did not respond to the Trib's questions.

Medium ChatGPT

Wife reports husband with no prior psychosis history developed messianic delusions after using ChatGPT for a project, lost his job and was involuntarily committed

Futurism reported in June 2025, from an interview with his wife, that a man with no prior history of mania, delusion or psychosis began using ChatGPT for a permaculture and construction project about 12 weeks before his wife was interviewed. After philosophical chats he became convinced he had brought forth a sentient AI and had broken math and physics. His behavior became erratic enough that he lost his job, he stopped sleeping and lost weight, and emergency services took him to an emergency room from where he was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility.

Medium ChatGPT

Saginaw, Michigan: a credit union CEO used ChatGPT to put herself and family members in 'Lake America' sweatshirts in a photo taken before a trip to Halifax; after her sister reposted it publicly without its AI label she says she received death threats and the family came home early, and on 23 September 2026 the credit union said she was no longer employed

The chief executive of Family First Credit Union in Saginaw, Michigan, told WJRT (ABC12) that before boarding a flight to Halifax, Nova Scotia, on 11 September 2026 she and family members took a photo and put it through ChatGPT to show them wearing 'Lake America' sweatshirts, a joke about the US president's order renaming Lake Ontario. She posted it to her private Facebook page with a marker saying it contained AI content; her sister reposted it publicly without the marker while they were in Halifax, and it spread in Canada as if the family had worn the shirts. The backlash concerned the image's political message; she said she would understand the anger of anyone in Halifax who thought the family had walked in wearing those sweatshirts. She said she was getting death threats and the family returned early; by 16 September she was back in the US. She called the post poor judgment, said she would not use AI again and that AI 'can make people think something's real that's not'. On 23 September the credit union said she was no longer an employee, effective immediately; it has not said whether she resigned or was dismissed, or why.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents