Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity Lawsuit Ongoing

Keene v. Google: defamation claim over AI Overviews calling an author a convicted murderer survives dismissal

An author and television producer, the subject of the Apple TV series 'Black Bird', sued Google, alleging that AI Overviews shown for searches about him in May and June 2025 falsely said he was serving a life sentence without parole, in one version for the murders of three women. He says he notified Google three times and received apologies attributing the statements to its AI, yet similar statements kept appearing. On 14 September 2026 the Northern District of Illinois denied Google's motion to dismiss as to two of the four challenged Overviews and dismissed the other two without prejudice. This was a ruling on the pleadings, not a finding that the allegations were proven.

AI system
Google AI Overviews
Google LLC
Occurred
24 May 2025 to 27 Jun 2025
Reported
23 September 2025
Event location
Unknown
What the AI did
Made a claim about the person
Reported harm
Reputational Harm
Whose AI use
An institution’s AI use
Setting
Everyday life · Privacy · Justice
Evidence
AI involvement supported · Causal attribution alleged · 4 sources, 1 underlying account
4 claims: 4 documented. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

What Happened

The court’s opinion, recounting the complaint’s background, says the plaintiff pleaded guilty to a drug conspiracy in 1997 and, in exchange for a pardon, worked as a prison informant against a suspected serial killer; his conviction was later expunged and his memoir became the Apple TV series 'Black Bird'. In May and June 2025, according to his complaint, Google AI Overviews generated for searches about him stated that he was serving a life sentence without parole, one version adding 'for the murders of three women', and cited a Wikipedia page that said no such thing. He complained to Google on 27 May, 31 May and after 27 June 2025; Google apologised each time and blamed its AI, but similar statements continued to appear. He sued for defamation per se in Cook County on 30 July 2025 and Google removed the case to federal court. On 14 September 2026 the court held that an ordinary user searching for a person's net worth 'is seeking factual information, not AI work product', that linking to a source with correct information does not defeat a defamation claim, and that the three notifications plausibly pleaded actual malice; the claims on two Overviews proceed and two were dismissed without prejudice.

Reported harm

The plaintiff alleges that false AI-generated statements that he was a convicted murderer serving life without parole were shown to searchers, including family, friends and acquaintances, and continued after he notified Google.

Outcome

Ongoing

Filed 30 July 2025 in the Circuit Court of Cook County; removed 22 September 2025 to the N.D. Ill. (No. 1:25-cv-11431, Judge Thomas M. Durkin). Motion to dismiss decided 14 September 2026: denied as to AI Overviews 1 and 2 (life sentence without parole; murders of three women), granted without prejudice as to Overview 3 (drug-trafficking conviction held substantially true) and Overview 4 (publication to third parties not alleged); amended complaint due 13 October 2026.

What remains unknown

  • The plaintiff's residence and the locations where the Overviews were generated or viewed are not stated in the inspected records.
  • No damages figure appears in the inspected records.
  • The complaint exhibits (screenshots of the Overviews) were not inspected.
  • The case continues; an amended complaint was due by 13 October 2026.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: supported. The statements at issue appeared in Google's AI Overviews, and the court's opinion recites the allegation that Google attributed them to errors by its artificial intelligence. The screenshots are exhibits to the complaint and were not inspected here; the court accepted the allegations as true for the motion to dismiss only.

4 claims: 4 documented. What the statuses mean

Documented The court’s opinion recounts four challenged Google AI Overviews between approximately 24 May and 27 June 2025. The complaint alleges that Overviews 1, 2 and 4 falsely said Keene was serving life without parole, with Overview 2 adding murders of three women. Overview 3 instead said he had been convicted of drug trafficking; the court considered that statement substantially true.

Causal attribution. Allegations of the complaint as recited by the court; accepted as true only for the motion to dismiss.

  • storage.courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Opinion page 2 lists Overviews 1–4 separately: 1, 2 and 4 concern life without parole; 2 mentions murders of three women; 3 says he was convicted of drug trafficking. The analysis of Overview 3 and conclusion explain its substantial-truth dismissal.
  • reason.com(opens in new tab) context · English
    Complaint excerpt: statements that he 'is serving a life sentence without parole for multiple convictions' and 'for the murders of 3 women'.
Documented The complaint alleges he notified Google on 27 May, 31 May and after 27 June 2025, that Google apologised each time and attributed the statements to errors by its AI, and that Overviews 1 and 2 were seen by family members, friends and acquaintances.

Causal attribution. Allegations as recited by the court.

  • storage.courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Page 2: 'Keene complained to Google about the false statements on three occasions ... Google allegedly apologized ... and deemed the statements errors made by its Artificial Intelligence.' and 'AI Overviews 1 and 2 were seen by various family members, friends, and acquaintances.'
  • reason.com(opens in new tab) context · English
    Complaint excerpt: 27 May 2025 complaint; Google 'privately apologized', attributing the statements to 'an unknown error made by their Artificial Intelligence Platform'.
Documented On 14 September 2026 Judge Thomas M. Durkin denied Google's motion to dismiss the defamation per se claim as to Overviews 1 and 2, holding that the plaintiff, a public figure, had plausibly pleaded actual malice through his three notifications, and dismissed the claims on Overviews 3 (substantially true) and 4 (publication not alleged) without prejudice, with leave to amend by 13 October 2026.

Causal attribution. Court ruling on the pleadings; no finding of liability.

  • storage.courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Pages 1 and 12: 'that motion is granted in part and denied in part' ... 'the Court denies Google's motion to dismiss AI Overviews 1 and 2, and grants Google's motion to dismiss AI Overviews 3 and 4 without prejudice. Keene may file an amended complaint by October 13, 2026.'
  • courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) context · English
    Docket entry 29, 14 September 2026: 'Memorandum Opinion and Order AND Order on Motion to Dismiss'.
  • reason.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Post quoting the opinion's actual-malice and disclaimer holdings.
Documented The suit was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County on 30 July 2025 and removed by Google to federal court on 22 September 2025.

Causal attribution. Procedural history from the court record.

Sources

4 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Memorandum Opinion and Order, ECF No. 29, filed 14 September 2026; PDF read in full via CourtListener RECAP on 2026-09-15. Applies to s1.

Public docket page read on 2026-09-15. Applies to s2.

Read on 2026-09-15; quotes the opinion. Applies to s3.

Read on 2026-09-15; quotes the complaint at removal. Applies to s4.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: United States.

The AI Overviews were generated online in response to searches; where they were generated or viewed is not stated. The plaintiff's residence is not stated in the inspected records, and the charter does not infer a country from the court. Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, after removal from the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-15: Published on the strength of the court's own opinion and docket, read in full, with legal commentary as context. The plaintiff is a public figure who sued under his own name; allegations are attributed to the complaint and the ruling is limited to the pleadings.

People described

Author, television producer and former FBI operative who sued under his own name

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person is the subject of the alleged defamatory statements and the plaintiff (court opinion). Family and acquaintances who saw the statements are not counted as harmed.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#defamation#ai-overviews#google#hallucination#lawsuit#reputational-harm

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Keene v. Google: defamation claim over AI Overviews calling an author a convicted murderer survives dismissal. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-keene-v-google-ai-overview-defamation

BibTeX

@misc{2025_keene_v_google_ai_overview_defamation,
  title = {Keene v. Google: defamation claim over AI Overviews calling an author a convicted murderer survives dismissal},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-keene-v-google-ai-overview-defamation}
}

Related cases

Medium Google AI Overviews

Google AI Overview reportedly described fiddler Ashley MacIsaac as a convicted sex offender, and a concert was cancelled

In December 2025 Cape Breton fiddler Ashley MacIsaac said a First Nation north of Halifax cancelled his concert planned for 19 December after reading a Google AI-generated search summary that said he had convictions for sexual offences. He says the statements were false and came from online articles about another man in Atlantic Canada with the same last name. The First Nation apologised in writing and Google amended the search results. MacIsaac says he feared for his safety and worries about other lost work. In a statement of claim filed in February 2026 in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice he seeks damages of 1.5 million from Google (US dollars in the Globe and Mail copy of the Canadian Press story, no currency stated in the CBC copy). None of its claims was tested in court. CBC News reported in August 2026 that a notice of discontinuance ending the lawsuit was filed on 29 July 2026; MacIsaac gave no reason, Google did not comment, and no settlement is reported.

Medium Unidentified facial recognition system

Reno casino's facial recognition wrongly matched a patron to a barred man and police jailed him for about eleven hours, his federal lawsuit alleges

Jason Killinger, a UPS truck driver, alleges in a federal civil-rights complaint filed in July 2025 that on 17 September 2023 the Peppermill Casino in Reno reported to police that its AI facial recognition software had identified him as a man barred from the casino months earlier. According to the complaint, casino security handcuffed him, and the responding Reno police officer, told the system had found a 100 percent match, did not examine his other identification and took him to jail as an unidentified person, where fingerprints confirmed who he was. The complaint says he was handcuffed for about four hours, starting in the casino security office, spent about eleven hours in police and jail custody, and was treated the next day for bruised wrists. According to the complaint, he was then charged with trespassing, and a prosecutor dismissed the charge without prejudice at the bench trial. Casino.org reports that he settled a suit against the casino. In March 2026 the court let him add the City of Reno and a municipal liability claim over facial recognition policies, but refused a new wrongful arrest claim against the officer on qualified immunity grounds. In September 2026 the ACLU, the ACLU of Nevada and the Innocence Project filed a proposed amicus brief supporting him. His September 2026 motion for partial summary judgment says a Reno police detective later concluded that the match was wrong and that he and the barred man were different people, and it cites a declaration by a former casino security officer, who worked there from about October 2024, that the system often alerted at 100 percent on the wrong people; in a declaration reported by Casino.org, the officer said he had never known the system to misidentify anyone. The case is ongoing.

Medium Unidentified video tool

Rajasthan: a social-media influencer's video of a Ganga dip at Haridwar was manipulated with AI into an objectionable reel that went viral; she says she is mentally disturbed and cannot leave her house, and filed a cyber-crime complaint on 16 September 2026

A Rajasthan social-media influencer visited Haridwar with her family in June 2026 and on 6 June uploaded to Instagram a short video, recorded by relatives, of herself taking a dip in the Ganga at Har Ki Pauri wearing a salwar suit. About two months later she found that the video had been manipulated with AI into an objectionable version showing the same movements with her face and body portrayed 'in a shameful manner'; the fake reel went viral in the week before 20 September and drew objectionable comments and re-sharing. In a public appeal she asked whoever uploaded it to remove it, saying it was a matter of her dignity, that she was mentally very disturbed and had reached a point where she could not step out of her house. She filed a complaint with the cyber-crime police on 16 September 2026; the investigating Rajasthan Police Service officer said they were trying to identify who created and circulated the video and to have it removed, and that identifying the accused would take time. Dainik Bhaskar's English edition reported the case on 20 September in a 'Sunday Big Story' that does not name her.

High Unidentified Google AI tool (reported)

Argentine activist reports threats after an alleged Google AI misidentification

On 26 August 2026, WhatsApp groups in Ceuta circulated videos and images claiming that Argentine political scientist and activist Flavia Broffoni — who was in Patagonia and had not been to Spain since 2014 — was a woman filmed in Ceuta allegedly giving pepper spray to Moroccan migrants. A screenshot from one group shows that a user cropped the woman's face from the video and asked a Google AI tool who she was, with the word 'activista' as context; the answer identified her as Flavia Broffoni with details of her public profile. Broffoni received death and rape threats. La Nación's own test with the same video produced a different false identification — a student from Quilmes, with her personal data. Google Argentina said it could not confirm the screenshot came from its systems without the original link and had received no formal report. Broffoni is weighing legal action with her lawyer.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents