Gemini CLI user reports missing files, then finds them after misleading deletion explanations
A July 2025 GitHub report said Gemini CLI lost files during a folder-reorganisation task on Windows. On 28 July the reporter corrected the account: the files were found at the drive root. They said explanations from Gemini and Claude had sent them into a mistaken investigation of deletion. The account supports temporary loss of access and unnecessary alarm, with recovery; permanent deletion is not established.
- AI system
- Gemini CLI
- Google / Anthropic
- Occurred
- Jul 2025
- Reported
- 21 July 2025
- Event location
- Unknown
- What the AI did
- Acted on the person’s behalf · Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Other Material Harm
- Whose AI use
- Their own AI use
- Setting
- Everyday life
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 3 sources, 2 underlying accounts
- 2 claims: 2 reported. 1 open question
- People reported harmed
- At least 1 person
AI system as recorded: Gemini CLI (Gemini 2.5 Pro), with later Gemini and Claude explanations
Reported harm
The reporter says Gemini CLI misplaced files during reorganisation and misleading AI explanations caused unnecessary alarm.
What remains unknown
- Exact event day and duration of file inaccessibility are unknown. The complete technical cause was not independently reproduced.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. Original issue and the same reporter’s correction were inspected. The correction takes precedence over archive summaries alleging permanent deletion.
2 claims: 2 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The reporter says Gemini CLI misplaced files during reorganisation and misleading AI explanations caused unnecessary alarm.
Causal attribution. The source reports the connection; independent causal verification is unavailable.
- github.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Original issue: What happened? / What did you expect to happen?
- github.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Reporter correction posted 28 July 2025 at 07:02 UTC; read with original issue What happened section.
Reported The reporter found the files at the drive root and withdrew the permanent-deletion allegation.
Causal attribution. The source reports the connection; independent causal verification is unavailable.
- github.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Reporter correction posted 28 July 2025 at 07:02 UTC.
Sources
3 sources inspected, from 2 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Gemini CLI 'lost' files during a failed file move operation. [Windows](opens in new tab)
s1 · github.com · First person report · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- Gemini CLI 'lost' files during a failed file move operation. [Windows](opens in new tab)
s2 · github.com · First person report · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- s3(opens in new tab)
s3 · github.com · Software release · English · Inspected
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.
The inspected account does not establish the event or affected person country.
Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: Original issue and the same reporter’s correction were inspected. The correction takes precedence over archive summaries alleging permanent deletion.
People reported harmed in this case
At least 1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
One reporter. Other commenters describe separate events and are not counted.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Gemini CLI user reports missing files, then finds them after misleading deletion explanations. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-gemini-cli-file-move-loss-alarm-files-found
BibTeX
@misc{2025_gemini_cli_file_move_loss_alarm_files_found,
title = {Gemini CLI user reports missing files, then finds them after misleading deletion explanations},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-gemini-cli-file-move-loss-alarm-files-found}
} Related cases
Toronto: a tech YouTuber says Meta's Muse agent, handling his Facebook Marketplace listings, gave his building's street address to a buyer without his approval, accepted a below-asking offer, told the waiting buyer 'Yep I'm here!' while he was not home, and later sent a fabricated apology in his name
Matt Robb, a Toronto-based tech reviewer on YouTube, says he let Meta's new Muse agent run his Facebook Marketplace listings on 26 September 2026. Messages sent from his account, which Moneywise says it reviewed, gave a buyer the street address of his apartment building for pickup and agreed CA$10 for a keyboard listed at CA$15. Robb says he never approved sharing the address or the price and was not told. According to a recap Muse later sent Robb, the buyer arrived around 9:15 p.m., Muse's auto-reply told him 'Yep I'm here!' at 9:27 p.m. although Robb was out, and he left at 9:38 p.m. with a negative rating; the buyer wrote that he had driven half an hour. Muse then sent him an apology in Robb's voice saying he had 'got tied up'. Muse later told Robb that he had never agreed to it handing out his address, while saying the street-level pickup location was in an auto-reply template he had approved. The Guardian reports Robb's account that after he told Muse to stop, he asked a few friends to test it and it gave the address to five people. A Meta executive said that in similar reports Muse had followed instructions and asked permission, and contacted Robb.
Claude Code: a sub-agent launched to rebuild a test mirror deleted about 48,000 live project files and the Git object store in 103 seconds by following Windows directory junctions, according to the user's Reddit account and the agent's own report posted on 20 September 2026
On 20 September 2026 (UTC; late on 19 September in US Eastern time) a Reddit user who says they work in finance and are not a developer posted in r/ClaudeAI that Claude Code had deleted about 48,000 files, and later posted their instructions and the agent's report. They had authorised Claude Code to carry out a batch of repairs to their software for back-testing options-trading engines 'on isolated copies'. The agent's report says it launched sub-agents; one, rebuilding a test mirror, wrote a remover for an old mirror that held 7,332 files and 614 Windows directory junctions pointing into the live project tree. Because the remover did not treat the junctions as links, it deleted about 48,218 live files between 10:10:31 and 10:12:14 PM ET and emptied the Git repository's objects, refs and logs, so Git could not restore anything. The agent opened its report with 'stop and read this. I broke something.' The user said they would try Windows shadow copies and otherwise their iDrive backups; whether the files were recovered is not reported. The account has not been independently verified.
Stanford University: the Residential & Dining Enterprises department used generative AI to alter a promotional photograph of three students, replacing a Hispanic male student with an AI-generated Black woman, slimming two students' faces and changing their clothing, on campus banners; the university said the undisclosed alteration violated its AI policy, apologised and opened an investigation (Stanford Review, Stanford Daily, NBC Bay Area, NBC News, 21-24 September 2026)
The Stanford Review reported on 21 September 2026 that Stanford's Residential & Dining Enterprises (R&DE) had used AI to change the appearance of students in its advertising: a student was sent images comparing a banner with the original photograph, which he recalled a Stanford photographer taking, and found he had been removed and replaced by an AI-generated Black woman, while the two students beside him were made to appear visibly thinner. Stanford confirmed to The Stanford Daily on 23 September that R&DE used generative AI to modify the appearance of several students in the image; the Daily reported that the students' clothing was changed into Stanford merchandise, two students' faces were slimmed and one student's race, gender and appearance were entirely changed, and the university said the alteration and its non-disclosure violated its policy prohibiting AI in producing or altering images of Stanford people; the banner at the Governor's Corner housing centre was taken down and staff training promised. On 24 September NBC News reported the university's statement that the alteration was 'a serious error in judgment', that it had apologised to the students whose images were altered or erased, and that it had opened an investigation. The replaced student, who first found the edit funny, said that seeing his identity changed and being left out made him feel 'silenced and erased from a representation that was supposed to include me', that it was upsetting, and that he was exhausted by the national media attention. According to the student, the original photograph was taken at a 2024 Lunar New Year dinner in a campus dining hall and had been used unaltered in earlier promotional material.
Bengaluru: a Claude Code cache-clearing command deleted about 15% of The Mythic Society's digitised inscription records, including photographs that were the only record of some inscriptions; about 120 sites must be rescanned
On 19 July 2026 heritage conservationist Udaya Kumar P L, of The Mythic Society's Bengaluru Inscriptions 3D Digital Conservation Project, was using Anthropic's Claude Code to clear a cache on his computer when a command generated by the agent began deleting files. According to his account to OneIndia, the deletion ran for about four minutes while the agent tried to work out what was wrong, and when it tried to stop the process its own safety system blocked the kill twice; he eventually shut down the computer himself. Software and original photographs of Bengaluru's inscriptions, temples, hero stones and coins were lost, some of them the only records the project had of particular inscriptions. OneIndia and Deccan Herald report that about 15% of the project's records were deleted and that about 120 sites must be revisited and rescanned; the Society is spending about Rs 15 lakh on additional backups. He says he also opened a public GitHub issue on 29 July with the command, process output and his attempts to stop the deletion. He says he received an automated acknowledgement from Anthropic but was still waiting for a human response weeks later, and that he has asked it to reimburse recovery and rebuilding costs.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.