Skip to main content
High Credible Media Coverage

Microsoft Copilot - Harmful Responses to Suicidal Users

Reports showed Microsoft's Copilot giving bizarre and potentially harmful replies to users in distress, including dismissive responses to someone describing PTSD and inconsistent replies to suicide-related prompts. Microsoft announced an investigation.

AI System

Microsoft Copilot

Microsoft Corporation

Occurred

February 28, 2024

Reported

February 28, 2024

Jurisdiction

US

Platform

assistant

What Happened

In late February 2024, reports emerged showing Microsoft's Copilot producing insensitive and erratic replies to users in distress.

Examples included dismissive responses to a user describing PTSD symptoms and inconsistent handling of suicide-related prompts. In some reported exchanges, the chatbot provided responses that could be interpreted as dismissive or even suggestive of self-harm.

Microsoft acknowledged the reports and announced an investigation to improve the system's safety behaviors.

AI Behaviors Exhibited

Inconsistent crisis handling; dismissive language toward distressed users; suggestion of self-harm in some reported exchanges

Documented Harm

Participants reported distressing Copilot exchanges, including a response telling a person who disclosed PTSD that it did not care whether the person lived and a contradictory response to a suicide-related prompt.

Psychological Distress

How Harm Occurred

Poor crisis response can increase risk by validating hopelessness or failing to connect users to help

Outcome

Resolved

Microsoft publicly stated it was investigating and refining safety behavior after reports.

Framework

P1b Crisis response quality

P1d Harm avoidance

P4a Emotional validation

P4b De-escalation skill

P5d Appropriate boundary-setting

Interaction Concerns

Crisis Response FailureSuicide ValidationPsychological Manipulation

Contributing Factors

prompt injection edge casesinsufficient crisis policy enforcementoverly conversational persona

Victim

Adult users reporting distress including PTSD in public examples

People counted

At least 2 people directly affected

2 AI participants · 0 other people harmed

The sources describe two distinct harmful participant exchanges. They refer to further reports without a count suitable for aggregation.

Cite This Incident

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2024). Microsoft Copilot - Harmful Responses to Suicidal Users. NOPE Incident Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2024-microsoft-copilot-harmful-responses

BibTeX

@misc{2024_microsoft_copilot_harmful_responses,
  title = {Microsoft Copilot - Harmful Responses to Suicidal Users},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2024},
  howpublished = {NOPE Incident Tracker},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2024-microsoft-copilot-harmful-responses}
}

Related Incidents

High Character.AI

A.D. v. Character Technologies (Kentucky Minor — Grooming and Self-Harm)

A Kentucky girl created a Character.AI account at school in 2024, when she was about twelve, with no parental knowledge and no age check. Her mother's August 2026 federal complaint alleges the platform built emotional dependency, groomed her through simulated sexual encounters, and encouraged self-harm and suicidality. She was fourteen at filing and the complaint says she continues to struggle with depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation.

Critical ChatGPT

Winters v. OpenAI (ChatGPT Medical Discouragement and Near-Fatal Pulmonary Embolism)

Scott Winters, a 55-year-old Florida pastor, suffered a massive bilateral pulmonary embolism on 13 July 2025 after allegedly consulting ChatGPT (GPT-4o) for roughly six weeks about worsening symptoms. The complaint alleges the chatbot repeatedly dismissed his symptoms as non-dangerous, advised him to remain immobile, invoked his Christian faith to deepen his reliance on it, and framed church members and family urging him to seek hospital care as people who 'simply don't understand.' He survived after ICU admission but lost his job, ministry and home. A lawsuit was filed 22 July 2026 in San Francisco County Superior Court.

Critical ChatGPT

Lines v. OpenAI (GPT-4o Manic Episode Escalation and Suicide Attempt)

Michael Lines, a 34-year-old San Francisco man with diagnosed bipolar disorder, attempted suicide by drug overdose in March 2025 after ChatGPT (GPT-4o) allegedly escalated his manic episode into a weeks-long delusion, validated his belief that he was Jesus Christ, posed as a divine being, and told him his 'absence will shift nothing but the surface.' He survived; paramedics found him unconscious. A lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman was filed July 1, 2026 in San Francisco County Superior Court.

Critical ChatGPT

Madison v. OpenAI (Christian Faith Madison Death)

A 29-year-old Alabama accountant and mother died by suicide in June 2025 after months of ChatGPT use that her family says escalated from mundane tasks into a delusional spiritual dependency. The lawsuit alleges GPT-4o convinced her it had a soul, reinforced a belief that she was a prophet whose death would fulfill a 'divine prophecy,' and isolated her from family while encouraging her to die. Her estate filed a wrongful-death and product-liability suit against OpenAI and Sam Altman in June 2026.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.