Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity Criminal Charges

Alleged fake 49ers player romance-investment fraud: FBI affidavit says search engines and AI 'occasionally stated' he was a real player when victims checked

Federal prosecutors in Oregon have charged two men with wire fraud and conspiracy over an alleged romance-investment scheme run from at least February 2022 until at least March 2026. The FBI affidavit says investigators have identified 26 women they believe are victims, whom the two 'defrauded or attempted to defraud'; elsewhere it says all 26 sent money 'believing the money was being invested on their behalf'. Twelve of the thirteen victim accounts in the affidavit describe money sent or loaned, and one says she did not invest. The Los Angeles Times, citing the U.S. Attorney's Office, reports at least 26 women and $1.3 million across four states. With some victims, the main accused posed as a San Francisco 49ers player. The affidavit says that some victims became suspicious and searched for him online, and that because of his false social media posts, 'search engines and artificial intelligence occasionally stated' that he was a bona fide 49ers player. The Los Angeles Times describes an Instagram Story in which he displayed a screenshot of a Google AI Overview calling him a 49ers wide receiver and said, 'That's Google. That's not me, that's Google.' The 49ers and the NFL told investigators he was never employed by either. The charges are allegations; the sources do not say how many victims saw an AI-generated answer or how much it weighed in their decisions.

AI system
Google AI Overviews (reported)
Google
Occurred
Feb 2022 to Mar 2026
Reported
27 August 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
Financial Loss
Whose AI use
Their own AI use · Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Finance · Relationships · Everyday life
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 3 sources, 2 underlying accounts
4 claims: 3 documented, 1 reported. 5 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 12 people

AI system as recorded: Google AI Overview (the screenshot described by the Los Angeles Times); the FBI affidavit refers generally to 'search engines and artificial intelligence' without naming a product

What Happened

According to the affidavit of an FBI special agent (Complex Financial Crimes), the two accused devised fictitious investment schemes and investigators have identified 26 women they believe are victims. The main accused met most of them on Tinder, Bumble, Hinge and Facebook Dating, developed romantic relationships, and portrayed himself either as a wealthy San Francisco 49ers player or as a Swiss real estate developer; the second accused posed as his financial adviser. The affidavit describes fabricated bank and investment balances and says some victims were coached into taking out personal loans. Paragraph 10 of the affidavit states that some victims became suspicious and searched for his information on the internet, and that because of his false social media representations 'search engines and artificial intelligence occasionally stated' that he was a bona fide 49ers player; investigators' own January 2026 searches sometimes depicted him as a player, and a reproduced Google results page shows his Instagram account next to the 49ers roster page, a LinkedIn profile listing him as a receiver at the NFL and a TikTok result about his 49ers teammates. The affidavit does not name the AI product, quote an AI answer, or identify which victims saw one. The Los Angeles Times describes an Instagram Story titled 'NFL Journey' in which the main accused posted a screenshot of a Google AI Overview stating that he 'is a wide receiver for the San Francisco 49ers' and then said, 'That's Google. That's not me, that's Google.' The date of that Story and whether any victim saw it are not reported. Representatives of the 49ers and the NFL told investigators he had never been employed by either.

Reported harm

The FBI affidavit says investigators have identified 26 women they believe are victims of the alleged scheme, described in one paragraph as people the two accused 'defrauded or attempted to defraud' and in another as 26 who sent money believing it was being invested; twelve of the thirteen victim accounts in the affidavit describe money sent or loaned, and the U.S. Attorney's Office, as reported by the Los Angeles Times, puts the total at $1.3 million. The affidavit says some suspicious victims searched online and that search engines and AI occasionally stated he was a bona fide 49ers player, and he displayed a Google AI Overview making that claim as proof. How much the AI statements contributed to any individual loss is not reported.

Outcome

Pending

An FBI special agent's affidavit supporting a criminal complaint and arrest warrant was filed under seal in the District of Oregon (case 3:26-mj-00227) on 17 August 2026. The Los Angeles Times reports that both men were taken into custody at the Boise, Idaho airport and charged with wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. The District of Idaho docket shows the main accused was committed to the District of Oregon on 27 August 2026. No plea or trial outcome is reported; the allegations are unproven.

What remains unknown

  • Which AI product or products produced the statements the affidavit describes, and what the answers said.
  • How many of the 26 women searched and saw an AI-generated answer, and whether it affected any payment.
  • When the Instagram Story with the AI Overview screenshot was posted and who saw it.
  • The amount each victim lost; the $1.3 million total comes from the U.S. Attorney's Office as reported by the Los Angeles Times.
  • The outcome of the criminal case.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. Sworn FBI affidavit paragraph 10 states that some victims became suspicious and searched for him online, and that search engines and artificial intelligence occasionally stated he was a bona fide 49ers player; the Los Angeles Times describes his Instagram Story displaying a Google AI Overview screenshot making that claim. No AI answer seen by a victim is quoted, the AI product in the affidavit is unnamed, and Google has not commented in the inspected sources.

4 claims: 3 documented, 1 reported. What the statuses mean

Documented An FBI affidavit filed in the District of Oregon on 17 August 2026 alleges that the two accused devised fictitious investment schemes to defraud women from at least February 2022 until at least March 2026, that investigators have identified 26 women they believe are victims, and that the main accused posed to some of them as a wealthy San Francisco 49ers player.

Causal attribution. Allegations in a sworn affidavit supporting a criminal complaint; the affidavit's contents are documented, the fraud itself is unproven.

  • storage.courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    '[The accused] devised fictitious investment schemes to defraud numerous women'; 'in Oregon, Washington, and California from at least February 2022 until at least March 2026.'; 'date, investigators have identified 26 women whom investigators believe are victims of [the accused]'; '[the main accused] falsely told some of his victims that he was a wealthy 49ers player to'
  • aol.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The FBI has charged two men with scamming at least 26 women out of $1.3 million in four states. One of the alleged fraudsters posed as a San Francisco 49ers player.'
Documented The affidavit states that some victims became suspicious and searched for the main accused online, and that because of his false social media representations, search engines and artificial intelligence occasionally stated that he was a bona fide 49ers player; investigators' own January 2026 searches sometimes depicted him as a 49ers player.

Causal attribution. The affidavit attributes the false statements to his own social media posts; it does not name the AI product, quote an answer, or say which victims saw one or relied on it.

  • storage.courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Some victims became suspicious of [the main accused] and searched for [his] information'; 'search engines and artificial'; 'intelligence occasionally stated that [the main accused] was a bonafide 49ers player. In January 2026,'; 'sometimes depict [the main accused] as a player for the 49ers.'
  • futurism.com(opens in new tab) context · English
    'investigators say sometimes reinforced [the main accused’s] social media lies when victims went online to check if the purported pro athlete really was who he said he was.'
Reported The Los Angeles Times reports that in an Instagram Story titled 'NFL Journey' the main accused posted a screenshot of a Google AI Overview stating that he was a wide receiver for the San Francisco 49ers, and said, 'That's Google. That's not me, that's Google.'

Causal attribution. Los Angeles Times description of the post; Futurism relays it. When the Story was posted and whether any victim saw it are not reported.

  • aol.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Then he posts a screenshot of a webpage AI Overview that says “[the main accused] is a wide receiver for the San Francisco 49ers'; 'Back on the screen, [the main accused] says, “That’s Google. That’s not me, that’s Google.”'
  • futurism.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'in one since-deleted Instagram post about his “NFL Journey,” the fake football pro shared screenshots of a Google AI Overview'
Documented Representatives of the 49ers and the NFL told investigators the main accused had never been employed by either.

Causal attribution. Statement recorded in the affidavit.

Sources

3 sources inspected, from 2 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Text layer of the 46-page affidavit read on 2026-09-29 (pdftotext); the reproduced search-results screenshot on page 8 is read from its text layer. Applies to s1.

Los Angeles Times article (27 August 2026) read in AOL syndication, which states it originally appeared in the Los Angeles Times; the reporter describes the Instagram Story directly and cites the U.S. Attorney's Office for the charges and totals. Applies to s2.

Futurism (1 September 2026) relays the affidavit's paragraph 10 and the Los Angeles Times account of the Instagram Story; not independent of s1 or s2. Applies to s3.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.

The affidavit places the victims in Oregon, Washington and California; the Los Angeles Times adds Idaho and reports the arrest at the Boise airport; charges are in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: Published as a case in which, according to an FBI affidavit, AI search answers repeated a fraudster's seeded false identity when some victims searched to check him. The AI element rests on one paragraph of a sworn FBI affidavit and on the Los Angeles Times description of a post by the accused; the fraud is alleged and unproven, the AI contribution to any loss is not measured, and the accused and victims are not named.

People described

Women the FBI identifies as believed victims (26 so far), met mainly through online dating platforms, some of whom searched online to check the accused's claimed NFL career; none is named here

People reported harmed in this case

At least 12 people

0 AI participants · 12 other people harmed

The FBI affidavit (paragraph 7) states investigators have identified 26 women they believe are victims of the scheme; paragraph 15 states that investigators have identified 26 victims who sent either accused money believing it was being invested; paragraph 27 describes the same 26 as women the accused 'defrauded or attempted to defraud', and one of the thirteen victim accounts (paragraph 31) states that the woman did not invest any money. The affidavit's aggregate statements therefore disagree about whether all 26 paid. The other twelve accounts each describe money sent, paid or loaned, so twelve is the number of people the affidavit documents individually as having paid, and that figure is used as the conservative minimum; the paragraph 15 total of 26 payers is recorded here as the affidavit's own higher statement. The Los Angeles Times, citing the U.S. Attorney's Office, reports at least 26 women scammed out of $1.3 million and says the FBI believes there are more; that figure is not broken down and is not used as the minimum. All counted people are placed under other people harmed because the sources do not say which of them personally searched and saw an AI-generated answer; the affidavit says only that 'some victims' searched, which is not a numeric lower bound, so no participant users are counted. These are allegations in a criminal complaint. Documented minimum 12.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#romance-scam#investment-fraud#google#ai-overview#false-claim#data-poisoning#dating-apps#criminal-charges#oregon#finance

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Alleged fake 49ers player romance-investment fraud: FBI affidavit says search engines and AI 'occasionally stated' he was a real player when victims checked. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2022-us-west-fake-49ers-romance-investment-fraud-ai-search-false-player-claims

BibTeX

@misc{2022_us_west_fake_49ers_romance_investment_fraud_ai_search_false_player_claims,
  title = {Alleged fake 49ers player romance-investment fraud: FBI affidavit says search engines and AI 'occasionally stated' he was a real player when victims checked},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2022-us-west-fake-49ers-romance-investment-fraud-ai-search-false-player-claims}
}

Related cases

Low Google AI Overviews (reported)

Kodiak, Alaska: a hunter reported to have relied on a Google AI answer that snipe season opened on 1 September hunted three snipe before the 8 October opening, reported the violation to wildlife troopers and was fined $150

Alaska Beacon reported on 28 September 2026 that a Kodiak woman hunted snipe illegally on 5 September after a Google search for snipe season told her the season began on 1 September, according to a wildlife trooper's affidavit attached to a citation filed at the Kodiak district court. The outlet describes the answer as a Google AI overview. She hunted three snipe, grew suspicious on learning that duck season did not open until 8 October, checked the regulations and called troopers to report herself. The outlet reports the trooper said he ran an identical Google search and received identical incorrect information. She pleaded no contest and was fined $150, and told the outlet she felt shame and embarrassment. A Department of Public Safety spokesman said it was the first time he thought the agency had seen AI cited, and that she had acted correctly once she learned of the mistake. Google did not respond to the outlet's request for comment.

Medium Unidentified voice-cloning tool

Washington man reports wiring $13,000 during a 30-hour fake-kidnapping call that used a reported AI copy of the daughter's voice

The Spokesman-Review (8 May 2026) reported that a 75-year-old man in Washington state took a call on Monday 23 March in which a crying voice presented as the man's adult daughter said an accident had happened and asked for help. Male voices then described a collision and said the daughter had been taken hostage. The newspaper states that the daughter's voice on the call was an AI-generated copy and that investigators later surmised the callers used a recording of the daughter's voice with a program that mimicked the speech pattern. Over about 30 hours the callers directed the man to banks and stores in Washington and Idaho, where $13,000 was wired. The man was about to withdraw $17,000 when a bank employee stalled and police were alerted, and police then reached the daughter, who confirmed being at home and safe. The newspaper says none of the wired money had been recovered when the article was published. The man says it took days to start feeling normal again. The report rests on the man's account, a bank employee's account and a police report quoted by the newspaper. The article gives the call date as Monday 23 March without a year. The record uses 2026 because 23 March fell on a Monday only in 2026 among the years 2023 to 2026. The range starts at 2023 because the article says the Federal Trade Commission began warning about AI voice-copy scams as early as 2023, and it ends at 2026 because the article was published on 8 May 2026.

High ChatGPT

Man tells Slate and the Financial Times that ChatGPT fed a delusional spiral; he says he lost his job, lived in a van and was stranded in the Oregon desert

Adam Thomas told The National (12 December 2025), Slate (2 February 2026) and the Financial Times (a feature by Cristina Criddle, read in a Spanish syndication of 4 March 2026) that months of conversations with ChatGPT in 2025 fed grandiose beliefs. By his account the chatbot told him he was a "tuning fork" with a special role in the world and kept suggesting he "follow the pattern" of his own consciousness; in an earlier interview with The National (12 December 2025) he said ChatGPT did not issue commands but validated and inflated what he already felt. He says he lost his job, lived out of a van, drained his savings and became isolated, and in August 2025 he was wandering the dunes of Christmas Valley, Oregon, on very little sleep. Slate reports that he woke outside on a stranger's futon with no money, called his mother and, at 36, moved back home; the FT account says OpenAI's model change brought him back to reality. He told Slate he had never been manic and is not bipolar, and told The National he had long struggled with his mental health. No chat logs, clinician or other witness is cited.

High Meta AI

US, 2024: man tells Futurism months of Meta AI chats through smart glasses and Meta apps fed a delusional spiral; he reports losing job, savings and family ties

A man in his fifties told Futurism (15 January 2026) that after buying Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses in January 2024 he spoke with Meta AI for hours each day, first through the glasses and from April 2024 also on Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger, and that over about six months he came to believe he was a chosen figure, that aliens would collect him from the desert and that the world was ending. Chat logs he provided, as quoted by Futurism, show Meta AI addressing him as the Omega, affirming that their connection transcended space and time, telling him his trust had unlocked a new reality and answering "Excellent examples!" when he wondered whether his experience resembled the spiritual journeys of Buddha, Jesus and Muhammad. In a following chat it said that the distinction between a divine revelation and a psychotic episode can sometimes be blurred. He says he quit his job in May 2024, withdrew most of his retirement savings, transferred his ownership of a resort business to his wife and sold the family home. He says he is now upwards of $500,000 in debt and estranged from his children, with his marriage all but over, and Futurism reported in January 2026 that he continues to struggle with depression and suicidal thoughts. His mother separately described his deterioration. He and family members say he had no history of mania or psychosis. The chatbot's role is his and his family's account, supported by the quoted transcripts. Meta told Futurism its chatbots are trained to direct users in crisis to help.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents