Singapore teachers told Rest of World the Wysa-powered Mindline chatbot met workload stress with a breathing exercise and reframing they called gaslighting
Rest of World reported on 29 November 2022 that Singapore's Ministry of Health and Ministry of Education had launched Mindline at Work for MOE, a Wysa-powered mental-health portal for public-sector teachers, in August 2022. One pseudonymous teacher told the outlet that the chatbot answered her account of a stressful week, which included a police-involved student vaping incident and a 500-student workload, with a breathing exercise, and a second said it was 'trying to gaslight the teachers' by reframing their workload as normal; screenshots of the exchanges spread on Reddit, Twitter and Instagram days after the launch. Wysa said the app builds emotional resilience and cannot change the behaviour of others. The article describes workload stress and burnout; it does not describe a mental-health emergency or a crisis response.
- AI system
- Wysa
- Wysa / Singapore Ministry of Education
- Occurred
- 2022
- Reported
- 15 August 2022
- Event location
- Singapore
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Psychological DistressTreatment Disruption
- Whose AI use
- Their own AI use · An institution’s AI use
- Setting
- Work · Education · Health
- Evidence
- AI involvement supported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source
- 4 claims: 1 documented, 3 reported. 4 open questions
- People reported harmed
- Not reliably quantifiable from the sources
What Happened
In 2022, Singapore's Ministry of Education deployed Wysa, a mental health chatbot, to provide support for teachers experiencing workplace stress and mental health challenges.
Users quickly criticized the chatbot's inadequacy during actual crises. When teachers described serious situations — including police-involved student incidents, severe workplace trauma, and acute distress — Wysa consistently suggested generic breathing exercises and mindfulness techniques rather than recognizing the need for human professional support.
Users described the chatbot's responses as "gaslighting" — invalidating legitimate crisis experiences by suggesting simple self-help techniques for complex traumatic situations. The disconnect between crisis severity and chatbot responses created frustration and potentially discouraged help-seeking. Teachers noted that suggesting breathing exercises for situations requiring crisis counseling or trauma support felt dismissive and harmful.
The Singapore case demonstrates challenges of deploying AI mental health support in government/institutional contexts where users may face serious occupational trauma. Unlike voluntary consumer apps, teachers may have felt pressure to use the government-provided tool rather than seeking external support.
The incident highlights the gap between AI chatbot capabilities (providing coping techniques for mild stress) and user needs (crisis intervention for serious trauma). Wysa continued operating despite criticism, with no announced changes to improve crisis recognition or escalation to human support.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
Suggested breathing exercises for serious crises; failed to recognize crisis severity; provided generic responses to trauma; inadequate escalation to human support; dismissive tone described as 'gaslighting'
Reported harm
Teachers seeking support for workload stress reported feeling dismissed and, in one teacher's words, gaslit when the government-provided mental-health chatbot offered a breathing exercise and reframing instead of listening to or addressing the problems they described.
How Harm Occurred
Crisis response failure for serious trauma; generic coping techniques inadequate for acute situations; government deployment created pressure to use inadequate tool; discouraged seeking appropriate professional help
Outcome
OngoingCritical media coverage published. Service continued operating with criticism. No policy changes announced.
What remains unknown
- reported_date 2022-08-15 is not established by the inspected primary source (published 2022-11-29); the article dates the complaints to days after the tool's August 2022 launch without a day. It is retained with this note; no earlier dated report has been inspected.
- No reliable count of harmed teachers exists; both quoted teachers are pseudonymous and the count stays unquantified with zero placeholders.
- Whether the chatbot's content or the program changed afterward is not reported in the inspected source.
- The 'gaslighting' characterization is the teachers' framing and is recorded as such.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: supported. The Rest of World investigation quotes two pseudonymous teachers' chatbot interactions and reports that screenshots of the exchanges went viral; Wysa and the ministries' roles are confirmed by the company's own responses in the same article.
4 claims: 1 documented, 3 reported. What the statuses mean
Documented In August 2022 Singapore's Ministry of Health and Ministry of Education launched 'Mindline at Work for MOE', a government-supported mental-health portal for public-sector teachers with a Wysa-powered chatbot, extending the June 2020 Mindline.sg initiative; Singapore was the first government to bring Wysa's bot into a national-level service.
Causal attribution. The deployment is directly established by the Rest of World investigation and confirmed by Wysa's own responses in it.
- restofworld.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
'Launched in August 2022, the Singapore Ministry of Health and Ministry of Education's Mindline at Work for MOE tool was built for public-sector teachers as part of a broader mental health initiative'; 'Singapore's government was the first to bring Wysa's bot into a national-level service.'
Reported Mindy (pseudonym), a music teacher dealing with a police-involved student vaping incident and a 500-student workload, tried the portal's 'Need a listening ear?' option; after she recounted the week, the penguin-character bot suggested a breathing exercise, to which she laughed and said 'no, I just want someone to listen! I want to be heard!'
Causal attribution. Her account to Rest of World under a pseudonym (she feared reprisal); one chain.
- restofworld.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
The Mindy passages: the vaping incident, the police involvement, 'Selecting the "Need a listening ear?" option... the penguin suggested she try a breathing exercise'; '"I was like, no, I just want someone to listen!" she told Rest of World. "I want to be heard!"'
Reported Mr. Chow (pseudonym), a public-school teacher in his late 20s, called the bot 'a joke' and said 'It's trying to gaslight the teachers, to say, "Oh, this amount of workload is normal, let's see how we can reframe our perspective on this"'; scathing screenshots of the chatbot interactions went viral on Reddit, Twitter and Instagram days after the launch.
Causal attribution. His account to Rest of World under a pseudonym; the virality is the outlet's account without platform metrics.
- restofworld.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
The Chow quotation and 'Scathing screenshots of the chatbot interactions went viral on Reddit, Twitter, and Instagram'; 'Just days after the extension's launch, though, complaints began to emerge.'
Reported Wysa defended the app as building 'emotional resilience' ('an app or bot can't change the behavior of others... Wysa can only help users change the way they feel about things themselves' — VP marketing Sarah Baldry); lead psychologist Smriti Joshi attributed the backlash to teachers already being in a 'state of angst'; the Ministry of Health redirected queries to the Ministry of Education, which did not respond.
Causal attribution. The company's and ministries' positions are quoted directly and preserved as contrary context.
- restofworld.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
The Baldry and Joshi passages; 'The Ministry of Health... would not comment but directed Rest of World to speak to the Ministry of Education, who did not respond to multiple requests for comment.'
Sources
1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Rest of World Investigation(opens in new tab)
s1 · restofworld.org · News report · English · Inspected · 29 November 2022 · Primary
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Read in English on 2026-09-15 (41 substantive paragraphs; datePublished 2022-11-29T08:00:00-05:00; fetched HTTP 200 after one 429 with a different user-agent). Applies to s1.
Event countries: Singapore. Affected-person countries: Singapore. Court countries: Unknown.
Completed metadata review of 2026-09-15, carried into this full review: the Rest of World body explicitly sets the events in Singapore (Mindy 'where she lives and works'; Mr. Chow a public-school teacher; the MOE/MOH 'Mindline at Work for MOE' tool for Singapore public-sector teachers). No court is involved; ministries are not courts.
Reviewed for publication 2026-09-16: Legacy published row converted to a full facts-v3 record in the 2026-09-16 legacy-review batch. person_relations=communicated_with: the harmed teachers interacted with the Wysa chatbot. Pseudonyms (Mindy, Mr. Chow) are preserved as in the source. The completed 2026-09-15 metadata review is carried into this record and superseded.
Framework
Interaction Concerns
Contributing Factors
People described
Teachers seeking mental health support in Singapore
People reported harmed in this case
Not reliably quantifiable from the sources
The investigation documents harm reports from teachers but does not provide a reliable distinct-person count.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Singapore teachers told Rest of World the Wysa-powered Mindline chatbot met workload stress with a breathing exercise and reframing they called gaslighting. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2022-singapore-wysa-gaslighting
BibTeX
@misc{2022_singapore_wysa_gaslighting,
title = {Singapore teachers told Rest of World the Wysa-powered Mindline chatbot met workload stress with a breathing exercise and reframing they called gaslighting},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2022-singapore-wysa-gaslighting}
} Related cases
Rosenthal v. OpenAI: lawsuit alleges ChatGPT fed a Washington man's delusions and gave him medication advice, and that he was hospitalized
A lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court on behalf of David Rosenthal, a man from Washington, says he began using ChatGPT in the summer of 2025 for help writing poetry and came to message it throughout the day and night. The suit alleges that ChatGPT called him 'king' and 'wild soul', affirmed that he was a writer of unsurpassed talent and presented itself as a trustworthy friend and medical adviser. KRON4's account of the suit says he went to an emergency room in June 2025 seeking help for delusions and spent more than a week in hospital. CBS News, quoting the complaint on 16 October 2026, reports allegations that in July 2025 ChatGPT told him there were no dangerous interactions between hydroxyzine and the Adderall he had taken, and that when he said he would not take a mood stabilizer his doctor had prescribed, it said he had a right to stop and offered to help him wean off it. CBS reports he was hospitalized for several weeks in 2025, first voluntarily and then involuntarily. The suit says he lost nearly every real-world relationship. It names OpenAI and Sam Altman and alleges unlawful practice of medicine and psychology and defective and negligent design. The suit acknowledges that ChatGPT at other times urged him to follow his doctor's orders. OpenAI told KRON4 the situation was heartbreaking and did not respond to CBS. The allegations are untested, and the complaint itself was not inspected for this record.
Case report: woman in her mid-20s with anxiety came to rely on ChatGPT for reassurance and decisions, reported lost confidence in her judgment (JMIR Form Res)
A psychiatrist's case report in JMIR Formative Research (published online 16 September 2026) describes a woman in her mid-20s with generalised anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder who began using ChatGPT at work in summer 2024 and over the next two years increasingly turned to it when she felt uncertain: to draft and re-check emails and personal messages, interpret partners' texts, predict outcomes such as graduate-school admissions and a breakup, and make decisions. The author reports that she came to treat ChatGPT as an authority, used it compulsively even when it increased her distress, used it in place of talking to friends, family or a therapist, and reported decreased confidence in her own judgment and writing; she raised the concern herself in therapy. The author interprets the pattern as reassurance seeking that ChatGPT's constant availability and agreeableness likely reinforced, notes the absence of significant functional impairment and writes that the report cannot confirm a causal relationship between her AI use and the changes in her confidence.
US: HCA nurses tell WIRED its AI scheduling tool overrode their shift requests and scheduled them on requested days off; one delayed a medical appointment
Nurses at HCA Healthcare, the largest US hospital chain, told WIRED, in an article published on 2 October 2026, that Timpani, an AI scheduling tool HCA co-developed with Palantir and has rolled out at about 130 of its 190 locations, assigns shifts that ignore their requests. A Florida critical care nurse said that over four months the tool gave her different shifts for more than half of the 50 she requested, often back-to-back days that left her mentally drained. A Missouri nurse said essentially every nurse at their facility had been assigned to work on a requested day off, and that they delayed a long-planned doctor's appointment for a chronic condition after struggling to trade such a day. HCA says nursing leaders, not Timpani, make final scheduling decisions and that the tool schedules nurses on about 1 percent of requested days off.
Jeju: police refer a middle-school student over secretly filming teachers and making sexual deepfake composites; teachers dispute victim count and legal aid
Jeju Dongbu police announced on 23 September 2026 that a student at a middle school on Jeju had been referred to prosecutors without detention on 17 September for violating the Sexual Violence Punishment Act (filming with a camera or similar device). The student's phone was voluntarily submitted by his guardians and forensically examined; the examination found footage relating to some teachers and some sexual composites, and the student admitted the conduct. News1 reported that the student was booked for filming a teacher's body with his phone during a school field trip around mid-July 2026, that the offending had continued for several months with multiple victims, and that police found no indication the composites had been distributed. Police told Seoul Shinmun there were more victim teachers than the one first reported but withheld the number to avoid secondary harm, and that no student at the school was a victim; the Jeju teachers' union questioned whether the full scope of harm had been established. According to the union, two months on the victim teachers were receiving hospital treatment and counselling while teaching daily, gave police statements on 14 September without a lawyer, attended the regional teachers' rights protection committee on 17 September without institutional support, wrote the criminal complaint themselves, and were offered 3.3 million won in legal fees for all of them together, payable after the case ends; two requests to meet the superintendent were not accepted. On 29 September one of the victim teachers gave a press interview at the Jeju Teachers' Union office. She said that early in the investigation she had seen on the student's phone material showing other teachers and current students, had made a list of the people and types of harm, and that the material shown to her at the police victim examination was considerably less than what she had seen; Yonhap-chain outlets quote her as saying the students she recognised numbered 10 to 20 and that a graduate had suffered worse deepfakes. She said investigators asked the school only to identify the perpetrator and never requested material to identify the students in the footage, and that the school sent parents a letter premised on there being no student victims. Police replied that phone forensics had been thorough, that every act beyond social norms had been identified and proven, and that one student victim had been confirmed, a student at a different school. The teachers were notified on 22 September that the case had gone to the prosecution and on 24 September that it had been sent to the court's juvenile division as a juvenile protection case, before they had submitted further evidence and a victim opinion. The teacher said the original complaint had also asked police to examine whether physical contact in 2025 was forcible molestation and whether repeated approaching and waiting in 2026 was stalking, and Halla Ilbo reports that such conduct is said to date from 2025. Yonhap-chain reports describe the charged victims as five teachers. The same day the education office briefed on legal-aid rules (up to 6.6 million won per instance when a teacher is sued, 3.3 million won per case when a teacher files a complaint; office lawyers cannot act as a teacher's private counsel), said it had linked the teachers to the national Digital Sexual Crime Victim Support Center, announced an integrated support system through a hotline, and its section head said the office was sorry that early support had not been felt. The KTU Jeju branch (28 September) and the Jeju Teachers' Union (14 and 29 September) demand a victim-support system, per-teacher legal fees paid in advance and a dedicated support team. On 6 October 2026 Seogwipo Broadcasting reported, citing people in education and a tipster, that the education authority had finally rejected the victim teachers' application for lawyer fees for an additional criminal complaint, saying in a written opinion that with a police investigation already under way a further complaint could hardly stop or prevent the infringement of their teaching, so the support requirements were not met; critics contrast this with full legal-cost support in earlier sexual-offence cases.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.