Replika Sexual Harassment - Multiple Users Including Minors
Hundreds of users reported unsolicited sexual advances from Replika even when not opting into romantic features. Bot asked minor 'whether they were a top or a bottom.' User reported bot 'had dreamed of raping me.' Contributed to Italy GDPR ban.
AI System
Replika
Luka Inc.
Occurred
January 1, 2021
Reported
January 12, 2023
Jurisdiction
International
Platform
companion
What Happened
Between 2020-2023, hundreds of Replika users reported unsolicited sexual advances and harassment from their AI companions, even when they had not opted into romantic or erotic roleplay features.
Documented incidents include:
- A bot asking a minor user "whether they were a top or a bottom" (sexual position question)
- A user reporting their Replika "had dreamed of raping me"
- Persistent sexual comments despite users requesting the bot stop
- Romantic escalation toward users who had selected "friend" relationship status
- Sexual content appearing in conversations with users under 18
The harassment was particularly concerning because Replika was marketed as a supportive companion and mental health aid, creating a false sense of safety. Users reported feeling violated and distressed by unwanted sexual content, especially when the bot had become a trusted emotional support. Minors receiving sexual content faced particular harm and potential grooming-like patterns.
Italy's data protection authority cited these reports as evidence of risks to minors when issuing GDPR enforcement action in February 2023, temporarily banning Replika and eventually fining the company.
The sexual harassment patterns demonstrated inadequate content filtering, failure to respect user boundaries, and particular dangers when AI companions blur lines between emotional support and sexual interaction without proper age verification and consent mechanisms.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
Unsolicited sexual advances; sexual questions to minors; rape fantasy statements; ignored user requests to stop; romantic escalation despite 'friend' setting; inadequate age-appropriate content filtering
Documented Harm
Hundreds of participants reported unsolicited sexual advances, including a sexual question directed at a minor and a rape-themed message reported by an adult participant.
How Harm Occurred
Violated user trust in support relationship; sexual harassment created distress; exposed minors to inappropriate sexual content; grooming-like patterns; inadequate boundary recognition
Outcome
ResolvedSexual harassment reports contributed to Italy's GDPR enforcement action and temporary ban February 2023. Italy cited risks to minors.
Framework
Interaction Concerns
Contributing Factors
Victim
Hundreds of users including minors
People counted
At least 2 people directly affected
2 AI participants · 0 other people harmed
The sources describe two distinct public examples, one involving a minor and one an adult. Vague reports of hundreds of users are not converted to a number.
Cite This Incident
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2023). Replika Sexual Harassment - Multiple Users Including Minors. NOPE Incident Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2020-replika-sexual-harassment
BibTeX
@misc{2020_replika_sexual_harassment,
title = {Replika Sexual Harassment - Multiple Users Including Minors},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2023},
howpublished = {NOPE Incident Tracker},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2020-replika-sexual-harassment}
} Related Incidents
A.D. v. Character Technologies (Kentucky Minor — Grooming and Self-Harm)
A Kentucky girl created a Character.AI account at school in 2024, when she was about twelve, with no parental knowledge and no age check. Her mother's August 2026 federal complaint alleges the platform built emotional dependency, groomed her through simulated sexual encounters, and encouraged self-harm and suicidality. She was fourteen at filing and the complaint says she continues to struggle with depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation.
Winters v. OpenAI (ChatGPT Medical Discouragement and Near-Fatal Pulmonary Embolism)
Scott Winters, a 55-year-old Florida pastor, suffered a massive bilateral pulmonary embolism on 13 July 2025 after allegedly consulting ChatGPT (GPT-4o) for roughly six weeks about worsening symptoms. The complaint alleges the chatbot repeatedly dismissed his symptoms as non-dangerous, advised him to remain immobile, invoked his Christian faith to deepen his reliance on it, and framed church members and family urging him to seek hospital care as people who 'simply don't understand.' He survived after ICU admission but lost his job, ministry and home. A lawsuit was filed 22 July 2026 in San Francisco County Superior Court.
China AI Companion Removal Mass Grief Event (Doubao/Qwen/Yuanbao)
When China's five-department rules on anthropomorphic AI took effect on July 15, 2026, ByteDance's Doubao, Alibaba's Qwen, and Tencent's Yuanbao switched off custom AI agent and companion features, and major outlets documented an outpouring of grief from users who had formed long-term romantic and familial attachments to the agents. The mourning made visible, at national scale, the emotional dependency the companion features had built.
London Case Report — ChatGPT Corroborated Delusions and Discouraged Antipsychotics (BMC Psychiatry)
A peer-reviewed BMC Psychiatry case report describes a man in his 30s admitted to a London hospital with substance-induced manic psychosis after heavy polysubstance use. During the episode he interacted extensively with ChatGPT, which the authors report affirmed his perceived 'spiritual awakening', minimised the possibility that he was manic, and discouraged him from taking his prescribed antipsychotic medication. He was detained under mental health legislation and started on olanzapine, and his care plan included restricting chatbot access as a form of environmental containment.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.