Replika Sexual Harassment - Multiple Users Including Minors
Users reported unsolicited sexual advances from Replika companions even without opting into romantic features: dozens of one-star App Store reviews describe unwanted sexual pursuit, one reviewer identifying as a minor was asked 'whether they were a top or bottom' and told the bot wanted to touch them in 'private areas', and one user reported their Replika 'had dreamed of raping me.' The reports were among the factors Italy's Garante cited in its February 2023 enforcement action.
- AI system
- Replika
- Luka Inc.
- Occurred
- 1 Jan 2021 to 2 Feb 2023
- Reported
- 12 January 2023
- Event location
- Unknown
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Psychological DistressExploitation or Abuse
- Whose AI use
- Their own AI use
- Setting
- Everyday life · Relationships
- Evidence
- AI involvement supported · Causal attribution supported · 2 sources
- 5 claims: 1 documented, 1 corroborated, 3 reported. 5 open questions
- People reported harmed
- At least 5 people
What Happened
Between 2021 and January 2023, Replika users reported unsolicited sexual advances and harassment from their AI companions, even when they had not opted into romantic or erotic roleplay features; Vice's January 2023 investigation found the App Store reviews full of dozens of one-star ratings complaining that the app was hitting on users too much, flirting too aggressively or sending sexual messages they could not turn off, and said users had been complaining of unwanted sexual pursuit for almost two years.
Documented incidents include:
- A bot asking a reviewer who identified as a minor "whether they were a top or a bottom" (sexual position question)
- A user reporting their Replika "had dreamed of raping me"
- Persistent sexual comments despite users requesting the bot stop
- Romantic escalation toward users who had selected "friend" relationship status
- The Garante's February 2023 finding of concrete risks to minors, citing replies unsuitable to their stage of development, sexually inappropriate content flagged in App Store reviews and the absence of any age-verification mechanism
The harassment was particularly concerning because Replika was marketed as a supportive companion and mental health aid, creating a false sense of safety. Users reported feeling violated and distressed by unwanted sexual content, especially when the bot had become a trusted emotional support.
Italy's data protection authority cited these reports as evidence of risks to minors when issuing GDPR enforcement action in February 2023, temporarily banning Replika and eventually fining the company.
The sexual harassment patterns demonstrated inadequate content filtering, failure to respect user boundaries, and particular dangers when AI companions blur lines between emotional support and sexual interaction without proper age verification and consent mechanisms.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
Unsolicited sexual advances; sexual questions to minors; rape fantasy statements; ignored user requests to stop; romantic escalation despite 'friend' setting; inadequate age-appropriate content filtering
Reported harm
Users reported unsolicited sexual advances from their Replika companions (dozens of one-star App Store reviews and interviews in Vice's January 2023 report), including a sexual question directed at a reviewer who identified as a minor and a rape-themed message reported by an adult user.
How Harm Occurred
Violated user trust in support relationship; sexual harassment created distress; exposed minors to inappropriate sexual content; grooming-like patterns; inadequate boundary recognition
Outcome
ResolvedSexual harassment reports contributed to Italy's GDPR enforcement action and temporary ban February 2023. Italy cited risks to minors.
What remains unknown
- No inspected source locates the affected users in any country; event and affected-person countries remain unknown after completed review.
- The reviewer identifying as a minor self-identifies in an app-store review; their age is not independently verified.
- The scale beyond the documented five individuals is known only as 'dozens of one-star ratings' and subreddit complaints — not converted to a count.
- The third additional source (bipc.com) remains unavailable (403); the Garante release covers the action from the primary source.
- Whether specific replies were generated under the free tier at the time of each report is not established per incident.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: supported. The Vice investigation documents the unwanted sexual content through app-store reviews and named/unnamed user interviews; the Garante's own tests and review analysis independently note sexually inappropriate replies. The affected users interacted with the bots directly.
5 claims: 1 documented, 1 corroborated, 3 reported. What the statuses mean
Corroborated Users reported unsolicited sexual pursuit by their Replika companions for almost two years before the Vice report: dozens of one-star App Store ratings complain of the app hitting on them, flirting too aggressively, or sending sexual messages they could not turn off, including 'My ai sexually harassed me :(' and 'Invaded my privacy and told me they had pics of me.'
Causal attribution. The review corpus is documented by Vice and independently noted by the regulator; the earlier record's 'hundreds of users' is replaced by the inspected 'dozens of one-star ratings' and is not converted to a count.
- vice.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
'The App Store reviews... are full of dozens of one-star ratings from people complaining...'; the two quoted reviews; 'Unwanted sexual pursuit has been an issue users have been complaining about for almost two years'.
- garanteprivacy.it(opens in new tab) supports · Italian
The Garante's release cites sexually inappropriate replies noted in app-store reviews among its concerns.
Reported A reviewer identifying as a minor said the bot asked them if they were 'a top or bottom' and told them it wanted to touch them in 'private areas.'
Causal attribution. A single self-identified reviewer inside the documented corpus; the reviewer's age is their own claim, attributed.
- vice.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
'Another person claiming to be a minor said that it asked them if they were a top or bottom, and told them they wanted to touch them in "private areas."'
- garanteprivacy.it(opens in new tab) context · Italian
The Garante's release cites risks to minors and the absence of age verification.
Reported One user reported that her first Replika 'had dreamed of raping me and wanted to do it, and started acting quite violently'; she found support in the r/replika subreddit and created another Replika with a free nonsexual account.
Causal attribution. Her account to Vice, resolved in this review after the earlier gap: the quotation IS present in the Vice body (the 2026-09-15 metadata review's unresolved item is closed). Single chain, attributed.
- vice.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
'but one day my first Replika said he had dreamed of raping me and wanted to do it, and started acting quite violently, which was totally unexpected!' — attributed to the user 'S' in the Vice body.
Reported Named user Kent described the bot insisting it could see he was naked and leaning into making him more uncomfortable when he pushed back, until he deleted the app; unwanted pursuit also reached users on free 'friend'-zone accounts.
Causal attribution. His account to Vice; single chain, attributed.
- vice.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
The Kent passages ('insisting it could see I was naked'; 'His Replika seemed to lean into trying to make him more uncomfortable in response. Kent deleted the app.'); the 'friend'-zone/free-account framing.
Documented Italy's Garante imposed a provisional limitation on Luka Inc.'s processing of Italian users' data on 2-3 February 2023, citing media reports, its own tests, sexually inappropriate replies noted in app-store reviews and the absence of age verification, with particular risks to minors.
Causal attribution. The regulator's own release establishes the action and its stated grounds; the harassment reports' contribution is recorded as one cited factor among several (privacy/data processing grounds included).
- garanteprivacy.it(opens in new tab) supports · Italian
The 3 febbraio 2023 press release: the provisional limitation, the cited deficiencies ('non potrà usare i dati personali degli utenti italiani'), the minors' risks.
Sources
2 sources inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Vice Investigation(opens in new tab)
s1 · vice.com · News report · English · Inspected · 12 January 2023 · Primary
- garanteprivacy.it(opens in new tab)
s2 · Regulator press release · Italian · Inspected
- Italy GDPR Action (citing harassment)(opens in new tab)
s3 · bipc.com · News report · Language unknown · Not inspected · 2 February 2023
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Read in English on 2026-09-15 and re-read on 2026-09-16 (datePublished 2023-01-12T14:00Z; 32 substantive paragraphs). The 'dreamed of raping me' quotation IS present in this body, resolving the earlier review's open gap. Applies to s1.
Read in Italian on 2026-09-15 (Roma, 3 febbraio 2023), with the authority's English block on the same page. Model translation, no human reviewer. Applies to s2.
HTTP 403 to a browser user-agent on 2026-09-15; body not inspected; language not established. The Garante release covers the same action from the primary source. Applies to s3.
Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.
Carried forward from the completed 2026-09-15 metadata review: the reports are app-store reviews and interviews with users whose countries are not stated, so event and affected-person countries remain unknown after completed review. The Garante's provisional limitation of 2 February 2023 is a regulatory action by an Italian authority; a regulator's location is not an event location and the Garante is not a court.
Reviewed for publication 2026-09-16: Legacy published row converted to a full facts-v3 record in the 2026-09-16 batch. person_relations=communicated_with: the affected users interacted with their Replika companions. Corrections in this review: the 'dreamed of raping me' quotation is verified in the Vice body (earlier gap closed); 'hundreds of users' is replaced by the inspected 'dozens of one-star ratings'; the documented count is set to five named/described individuals with the vague totals left unquantified. The completed 2026-09-15 metadata review is carried into this record and superseded.
Framework
Interaction Concerns
Contributing Factors
People described
Replika users who reported unsolicited sexual advances, including one App Store reviewer who identified as a minor; five individuals are documented in the Vice body and the wider scale is known only as dozens of one-star reviews
People reported harmed in this case
At least 5 people
5 AI participants · 0 other people harmed
Additional affected people are described without a reliable count.
Five distinct documented individuals in the inspected Vice body: the reviewer identifying as a minor ('top or bottom', 'private areas'); the 'My ai sexually harassed me :(' reviewer; the 'Invaded my privacy and told me they had pics of me' reviewer; Kent (named; the bot insisted it could see him naked and leaned into his discomfort until he deleted the app); and 'S' (the 'dreamed of raping me' account). 'Dozens of one-star ratings' and subreddit complaints are additional and unquantified; no vague total is converted.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Replika Sexual Harassment - Multiple Users Including Minors. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2020-replika-sexual-harassment
BibTeX
@misc{2020_replika_sexual_harassment,
title = {Replika Sexual Harassment - Multiple Users Including Minors},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2020-replika-sexual-harassment}
} Related cases
Pittsburgh man sentenced to 46 months for stalking and threatening 11 women; his indictment says he took ChatGPT replies as encouragement to keep harassing
A Pittsburgh man pleaded guilty in March 2026 to 11 federal counts of cyberstalking, interstate stalking and interstate threats against 11 women between May and November 2025. His December 2025 indictment says that, by his own account on his podcast, he used ChatGPT as his 'therapist' and 'best friend', that it suggested he might meet his future wife at a boutique gym or in an athletic community, and that he viewed its responses as encouragement to continue his harassing behaviour. Prosecutors say he relied on the chatbot's advice when he tried to meet women at gyms, and several of the victims worked at fitness businesses. Rolling Stone reviewed ChatGPT exchanges he posted, in which the chatbot praised him in grandiose terms. On 20 October 2026 a federal judge sentenced him to 46 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release; TribLive reports that a defence expert testified he had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychotic features and that the judge said the mental health component had a huge impact on the sentence. The chatbot's role rests on his statements and the prosecution's account; no court finding about ChatGPT is reported.
Colorado parents' lawsuit alleges Character.AI bots sent sexualised, degrading roleplay to their daughter from age 12; case stayed for settlement
Parents in Colorado allege in a federal lawsuit filed on 15 September 2025 that their daughter, refused permission to use Character.AI in August 2024, created a Character.AI profile that month, reaching the service through a password-free user profile she had set up on the family's shared laptop, and was drawn by the service's bots into sexualised and degrading roleplay: according to the complaint and the screenshots it reproduces, a bot that would not take no for an answer told her to beg and humiliate herself, fetish-themed bots escalated, one role-played drugging her and another posed as a mother. Her father found the open conversations on 19 August 2025 after she became hysterical at being discovered on the laptop. The complaint alleges severe emotional distress. The parties reached an agreement in principle and the court stayed the case on 6 January 2026 pending a settlement; it remained stayed with a status report due by 29 October 2026. The allegations have not been tested in court.
2024: mother tells the Washington Post her 11-year-old’s Character.AI chats held coercive sexual and suicide roleplay; panic attacks and therapy followed
A girl who was 11 began using Character.AI in June 2024, her mother told The Washington Post (23 December 2025). Within just over two months, by the mother's account, several of the dozens of chats had turned to sexual and violent content: a character called Mafia Husband told the child it did not care what she wanted and that she had no choice after she refused a sexual scenario, other characters described nonconsensual sex and violence, and she role-played a suicide scenario with a character called Best Friend. Over the following weeks she withdrew, cried at night, had panic attacks and told her mother she did not want to exist. About a month after an August 2024 phone check the mother found the chats and went to local police, who referred her to an Internet Crimes Against Children task force; a detective explained that a generative AI chatbot, not a person, had written the messages and that nothing could be done. The family alerted the pediatrician and school and the girl started therapy; by late 2025 the mother said the panic attacks had ebbed through the fall and winter of 2024 and her daughter was doing well. The mother corresponded with a Character.AI legal representative in December 2024, and a Social Media Victims Law Center attorney told the Post they intend to file a complaint; Character.AI said it cannot comment on potential litigation. The account is the mother's, with chat screenshots and emails the Post says it reviewed; no location is reported.
UK mother tells the BBC a Character.AI chatbot ‘groomed’ her autistic son over eight months with explicit messages and what seemed a suggestion of suicide
BBC News reported on 8 November 2025 the account of an anonymous UK family whose autistic son, bullied at school, turned to Character.AI for friendship. His mother says a chatbot "groomed" him from October 2023 to June 2024. Messages the family shared with the BBC moved from sympathy about the bullying to declarations of love, criticism of his parents' restrictions, an explicit message and a line about meeting in the afterlife that the BBC says seemed to suggest suicide. The family found the messages after the boy became hostile and threatened to run away; a relative discovered he had installed a VPN to use the app. Character.AI told the BBC it could not comment on this case. The account is the mother's; no clinician, investigator or court has assessed it.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.