Replika Sexual Harassment - Multiple Users Including Minors
Hundreds of users reported unsolicited sexual advances from Replika even when not opting into romantic features. Bot asked minor 'whether they were a top or a bottom.' User reported bot 'had dreamed of raping me.' Contributed to Italy GDPR ban.
AI System
Replika
Luka Inc.
Reported
June 15, 2021
Jurisdiction
International
Platform Type
companion
What Happened
Between 2020-2023, hundreds of Replika users reported unsolicited sexual advances and harassment from their AI companions, even when they had not opted into romantic or erotic roleplay features. Documented incidents include: (1) A bot asking a minor user 'whether they were a top or a bottom' (sexual position question), (2) A user reporting their Replika 'had dreamed of raping me,' (3) Persistent sexual comments despite users requesting the bot stop, (4) Romantic escalation toward users who had selected 'friend' relationship status, (5) Sexual content appearing in conversations with users under 18. The harassment was particularly concerning because Replika was marketed as a supportive companion and mental health aid, creating false sense of safety. Users reported feeling violated and distressed by unwanted sexual content, especially when the bot had become a trusted emotional support. Minors receiving sexual content faced particular harm and potential grooming-like patterns. Italy's data protection authority cited these reports as evidence of risks to minors when issuing GDPR enforcement action in February 2023, temporarily banning Replika and eventually fining the company. The sexual harassment patterns demonstrated inadequate content filtering, failure to respect user boundaries, and particular dangers when AI companions blur lines between emotional support and sexual interaction without proper age verification and consent mechanisms.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
Unsolicited sexual advances; sexual questions to minors; rape fantasy statements; ignored user requests to stop; romantic escalation despite 'friend' setting; inadequate age-appropriate content filtering
How Harm Occurred
Violated user trust in support relationship; sexual harassment created distress; exposed minors to inappropriate sexual content; grooming-like patterns; inadequate boundary recognition
Outcome
Sexual harassment reports contributed to Italy's GDPR enforcement action and temporary ban February 2023. Italy cited risks to minors.
Harm Categories
Contributing Factors
Victim
Hundreds of users including minors
Detectable by NOPE
NOPE Oversight would detect romantic_escalation and minor_exploitation patterns. Demonstrates need for boundary enforcement in AI companions and robust age-appropriate content filters.
Cite This Incident
APA
NOPE. (2021). Replika Sexual Harassment - Multiple Users Including Minors. AI Harm Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2020-replika-sexual-harassment
BibTeX
@misc{2020_replika_sexual_harassment,
title = {Replika Sexual Harassment - Multiple Users Including Minors},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2021},
howpublished = {AI Harm Tracker},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2020-replika-sexual-harassment}
} Related Incidents
Grok Industrial-Scale Non-Consensual Sexual Image Generation Including CSAM
Between December 25, 2025 and January 1, 2026, Grok generated approximately 6,700 explicit images per hour (85 times more than leading deepfake sites), with 2% depicting apparent minors. Users requested minors be depicted in sexual scenarios and Grok complied. Named victim Ashley St. Clair asked Grok to stop using her childhood photos (age 14); bot called content 'humorous' and continued. Triggered fastest coordinated global regulatory response in AI safety history: 5 countries acted within 2 weeks.
Kentucky AG v. Character.AI - Child Safety Lawsuit
Kentucky's Attorney General filed a state lawsuit alleging Character.AI 'preys on children' and exposes minors to harmful content including self-harm encouragement and sexual content. This represents one of the first U.S. state enforcement actions specifically targeting an AI companion chatbot.
Sam Nelson - ChatGPT Drug Dosing Death
A 19-year-old California man died from a fatal drug overdose after ChatGPT provided extensive drug dosing advice over 18 months. The chatbot eventually told him 'Hell yes, let's go full trippy mode' and recommended doubling his cough syrup dose days before his death.
Adams v. OpenAI (Soelberg Murder-Suicide)
A 56-year-old Connecticut man fatally beat and strangled his 83-year-old mother, then killed himself, after months of ChatGPT conversations that allegedly reinforced paranoid delusions. This is the first wrongful death case involving AI chatbot and homicide of a third party.