Campaigner reports panic and withdrawal from activism after sexual deepfake abuse
A campaigner described panic after discovering a sexual deepfake of herself in 2020. Reporting also describes threats and disclosure of her addresses. She temporarily stepped back from activism. The account attributes the effects to the combined harassment; the video’s individual contribution is unknown.
- AI system
- Unidentified video tool
- Occurred
- 2020
- Reported
- 21 October 2022
- Event location
- Unknown
- What the AI did
- Depicted or impersonated the person
- Reported harm
- Psychological DistressExploitation or Abuse
- Whose AI use
- Someone else’s AI use
- Setting
- Identity · Privacy · Work
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution supported · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
- 4 claims: 4 reported. 3 open questions
- People reported harmed
- 1 person
AI system as recorded: Unspecified AI deepfake video tool
Reported harm
The campaigner reported panic and nonconsensual sexual depiction.
Outcome
UnknownMedia Coverage
What remains unknown
- The exact date and creation location are unknown.
- The creator, generation software and longer-term outcomes beyond the inspected reporting remain unresolved.
- The separate effects of the video, threats and doxing are unknown.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. Metro and BBC reporting identify this particular video as a deepfake using AI. The creator and generation software are unverified.
4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The campaigner described panic on discovering a sexual deepfake video of herself in 2020.
Causal attribution. Participant account; independent verification of the reported consequence is unavailable.
- metro.co.uk(opens in new tab) supports · English
Opening account, event year and subsequent recognition of the fabricated video (L118-L125).
Reported BBC reporting describes threats, disclosure of her addresses and a temporary withdrawal from activism.
Causal attribution. Reported effects of the combined video abuse, threats and doxing; separate contributions cannot be determined.
- noticias.uol.com.br(opens in new tab) supports · Portuguese
Account of escalating threats and doxing (L434-L438), then effects on trust and stepping back from campaigning (L474-L476).
Reported The same BBC account reports that she later renewed her commitment to campaigning.
Causal attribution. Reported return to activism; does not establish full recovery.
- noticias.uol.com.br(opens in new tab) supports · Portuguese
Immediately following the withdrawal passage (L475-L476).
Reported BBC reporting says Twitter removed the video, abusive comments and doxing after a colleague reported them.
Causal attribution. Reported platform removal; complete removal from the internet is not established.
- noticias.uol.com.br(opens in new tab) supports · Portuguese
Paragraph about a colleague reporting the material and its removal from Twitter (L442).
Sources
2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Metro, 21 October 2022(opens in new tab)
s1 · metro.co.uk · Journalism · English · Inspected · 21 October 2022 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- syndicated_bbc_reporting(opens in new tab)
s2 · noticias.uol.com.br · Syndicated bbc reporting · Portuguese · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
English article body read directly, L118-L157. Web-reader route was blocked. Draws on the BBC documentary and participant accounts; the film itself was not viewed. Applies to s1.
Portuguese BBC report carried by UOL, read directly. English paraphrase by the model, without bilingual human review. Same documentary/participant chain as Metro, not independent corroboration. Applies to s2.
Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.
The inspected passages establish the campaigner’s British nationality but do not explicitly locate her at the time or establish residence. Country remains unknown.
Reviewed for publication 2026-09-25: Concrete adverse experience with a core person relation. Claims remain attributed to their sources. Technical and causal limits are recorded.
People reported harmed in this case
1 person
0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed
One affected campaigner. Other documentary participants are separate accounts.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Campaigner reports panic and withdrawal from activism after sexual deepfake abuse. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2020-campaigner-deepfake-video-harassment
BibTeX
@misc{2020_campaigner_deepfake_video_harassment,
title = {Campaigner reports panic and withdrawal from activism after sexual deepfake abuse},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2020-campaigner-deepfake-video-harassment}
} Related cases
Indian journalist reports acute distress and a hospital visit after sexual deepfake abuse
An Indian journalist later reported acute distress and a hospital visit after a sexual deepfake of her circulated in April 2018. The generation tool and clinical records were not inspected.
Northern Territory: a former NT Police assistant commissioner says an AI-generated sexually explicit video made from her official police photograph was circulated among serving officers; she learned of it in December 2025 and issued a statement after criminal proceedings against former colleagues concluded (ABC News, 24 September 2026)
Janelle Tonkin, a former assistant commissioner of the Northern Territory Police Force and now president of the Australasian Council of Women and Policing, said in a statement issued on 23 September 2026, after criminal proceedings on the matter were finalised, that in December 2025 she became aware that an AI-generated, sexually explicit video had been created using her official NT Police photograph; ABC News reports that the video was allegedly shared among serving members of the force and that she had taken former colleagues to court over it. She called the experience 'extremely distressing, personally and professionally' and said having her professional portrait 'turned into pornography and circulated among colleagues is something no person should have to experience'. The outcome of the court proceedings is not reported. An NT Police spokesperson said the force does not comment on internal investigations and was legally constrained from commenting on matters before the court, but that the conduct she was subjected to 'was, and always will be, totally unacceptable'; the NT Police Association condemned the conduct. Ms Tonkin said the video sat within a broader set of experiences in the force that she intends to describe later.
Australian advocate reports distress from nonconsensual deepfake videos
An Australian advocate described panic and sustained distress after discovering sexual deepfake videos bearing her identity. Earlier abuse involved edited still photographs. This record concerns the later AI-video episode, which was already reported in September 2018.
Rajasthan: a social-media influencer's video of a Ganga dip at Haridwar was manipulated with AI into an objectionable reel that went viral; she says she is mentally disturbed and cannot leave her house, and filed a cyber-crime complaint on 16 September 2026
A Rajasthan social-media influencer visited Haridwar with her family in June 2026 and on 6 June uploaded to Instagram a short video, recorded by relatives, of herself taking a dip in the Ganga at Har Ki Pauri wearing a salwar suit. About two months later she found that the video had been manipulated with AI into an objectionable version showing the same movements with her face and body portrayed 'in a shameful manner'; the fake reel went viral in the week before 20 September and drew objectionable comments and re-sharing. In a public appeal she asked whoever uploaded it to remove it, saying it was a matter of her dignity, that she was mentally very disturbed and had reached a point where she could not step out of her house. She filed a complaint with the cyber-crime police on 16 September 2026; the investigating Rajasthan Police Service officer said they were trying to identify who created and circulated the video and to have it removed, and that identifying the accused would take time. Dainik Bhaskar's English edition reported the case on 20 September in a 'Sunday Big Story' that does not name her.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.