WHO AI Health Ethics
WHO Ethics and Governance of AI for Health
WHO guidance emphasizing mental health AI often has methodological/quality flaws requiring extra scrutiny. Six ethical principles for health AI.
Jurisdiction
International
Enacted
Pending
Effective
Jun 28, 2021
Enforcement
TBD
Why It Matters
WHO explicitly flags mental health AI for extra scrutiny. Six principles framework. Influential in healthcare regulation.
At a Glance
Applies to
Who Must Comply
- Health AI developers and deployers (voluntary)
Obligations fall on:
Safety Provisions
- Principle 1: Protect autonomy
- Principle 2: Promote human wellbeing and safety
- Principle 3: Ensure transparency, explainability, intelligibility
- Principle 4: Foster responsibility and accountability
- Principle 5: Ensure inclusiveness and equity
- Principle 6: Promote responsive and sustainable AI
- Specific caution: Mental health AI often has methodological flaws
- Extra scrutiny required for vulnerable users
Primary Source
WHO
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200
View on map
International
Focus Areas
Cite This
APA
International. (2021). WHO Ethics and Governance of AI for Health.
Related Regulations
ISO 42001
First certifiable international standard for AI management systems. Uses Plan-Do-Check-Act methodology. Third-party certification available; major AI systems have achieved certification.
ISO 23894
AI risk management guidance complementing ISO 31000. Lifecycle risk management; audit/procurement language.
OECD AI Due Diligence
Non-binding OECD guidance applying the OECD's six-step responsible business conduct (RBC) due-diligence process to enterprises across the AI value chain, providing practical recommendations for identifying, preventing, mitigating, and accounting for adverse human-rights and societal impacts of AI systems.
UN/ITU AI & Child Rights Statement
Non-binding multilateral statement signed by thirteen UN and international organisations setting out principles for protecting children's rights in the design, deployment, and governance of AI systems, including provisions on harmful content, age assurance, transparency, and child-rights impact assessments.
MD HB 895
First US state law to outright ban surveillance-based personalized pricing in food retail and third-party delivery, prohibiting use of protected class data and dynamic pricing tied to consumer personal data with limited exceptions for cost-based pricing, loyalty programs, and explicit consent.
Brunei PDPO
Brunei's personal data protection order requiring DPIA and imposing penalties up to 10% Brunei turnover or $1M.
Last updated January 22, 2026. Verify against primary sources before relying on this information.