Skip to main content
NOPE
In Effect Law AI Safety

CA SB 524

Law Enforcement Agencies: Artificial Intelligence

Requires law enforcement agencies to disclose when AI is used to write or assist in creating official police reports, maintain audit trails, and preserve AI-generated first drafts.

Jurisdiction

California

Enacted

Oct 10, 2025

Effective

Jan 1, 2026

Enforcement

State-mandated local program oversight

Signed October 10, 2025; effective January 1, 2026

California Legislative Information

Why It Matters

Sets transparency requirements for AI use in criminal justice documentation; may influence similar requirements in other government contexts

Recent Developments

Signed into law October 10, 2025 by Governor Newsom

At a Glance

Who Must Comply

  • Law enforcement agencies
  • Law enforcement officers
  • AI vendors providing services to law enforcement

Obligations fall on:

Safety Provisions

  • Each page must identify AI programs used and state 'This report was written either fully or in part using artificial intelligence'
  • Officer signature required verifying review and accuracy of AI-generated content
  • First draft created by AI must be retained as long as the official report
  • Audit trail required identifying officers who used AI to create reports
  • AI vendors prohibited from sharing, selling, or using agency-provided information except for agency needs or court order

Compliance & Enforcement

Key Dates

Jan 1, 2026

All provisions take effect

View on map

California

Focus Areas

Algorithmic accountability
Active safeguards required

Compliance Help

Human review and signature verification required for all AI-generated police reports; audit trails and first drafts must be retained

See how NOPE helps

Cite This

APA

California. (2025). Law Enforcement Agencies: Artificial Intelligence.

Related Regulations

Enacted US-CA

CA SB 942

Requires large GenAI providers (1M+ monthly users) to provide free AI detection tools, embed latent disclosures (watermarks/metadata) in AI-generated content, and offer optional manifest (visible) disclosures to users.

In Effect US-CA

CA SB243

First US law specifically regulating companion chatbots. Uses capabilities-based definition (not intent-based). Requires evidence-based suicide detection, crisis referrals, and published protocols. Two-tier regime: baseline duties for all users, enhanced protections for known minors. Private right of action with $1,000 per violation.

In Effect US-KY

KY AI Governance Act

Establishes AI Governance Committee within state government to develop policies for responsible AI use. Creates framework for state agency AI deployment including risk assessment, transparency, and accountability measures. Committee advises on AI procurement and implementation.

In Effect US-PA

PA Digital Forgery Act

Amends Pennsylvania's forgery statutes to criminalize creation and distribution of non-consensual AI-generated deepfakes ('forged digital likenesses') with intent to defraud or injure. Establishes tiered criminal penalties including felony charges for fraud-related deepfakes.

In Effect US-SD

SD Deepfakes Act

Prohibits disseminating deepfakes about candidates within 90 days of election with intent to cause injury. Class 1 misdemeanor with up to 1 year imprisonment and $2,000 fine. Affirmative defense for content with AI manipulation disclosure. Civil remedies available to AG, candidates, and depicted individuals.

In Effect US-RI

RI Intimate Deepfakes Act

Establishes criminal penalties for distributing synthetic intimate imagery (AI-generated deepfake pornography) without consent. Creates civil remedies for victims. Protects internet service providers from liability for third-party content.

All regulations Check if this applies to you

Last updated January 27, 2026. Verify against primary sources before relying on this information.