G7 Hiroshima Process
G7 Hiroshima AI Process — Guiding Principles + Code of Conduct
11 guiding principles for advanced AI. Explicitly prohibits AI posing substantial safety or human rights risks. Code of conduct for developers.
Jurisdiction
International (G7)
G7
Enacted
Oct 30, 2023
Effective
Unknown
Enforcement
Not specified
Who Must Comply
Safety Provisions
- • 11 guiding principles for advanced AI
- • Prohibition: AI posing substantial safety risks
- • Prohibition: AI posing substantial human rights risks
- • Risk management and testing expectations
- • Transparency and information-sharing
- • Security controls and abuse prevention
- • Incident reporting/response
- • Responsible deployment and monitoring
Quick Facts
- Binding
- No
- Mental Health Focus
- No
- Child Safety Focus
- No
- Algorithmic Scope
- Yes
Why It Matters
G7 consensus creates influential soft law. "Are you following Hiroshima?" is reputational baseline.
What You Need to Comply
You need: evaluations, safety controls, monitoring, incident response, documentation matching advanced AI norms.
NOPE can helpCite This
APA
International (G7). (2023). G7 Hiroshima AI Process — Guiding Principles + Code of Conduct. Retrieved from https://nope.net/regs/g7-hiroshima-ai-process
BibTeX
@misc{g7_hiroshima_ai_process,
title = {G7 Hiroshima AI Process — Guiding Principles + Code of Conduct},
author = {International (G7)},
year = {2023},
url = {https://nope.net/regs/g7-hiroshima-ai-process}
} Related Regulations
AU AI Strategy
Continent-wide AI strategy endorsed by African Union Executive Council covering 55 member states. Phased implementation 2025-2030. Phase I (2025-2026) focuses on creating governance frameworks, developing national AI strategies, resource mobilization, and capacity building. Aims to harmonize AI development across Africa while respecting member state sovereignty.
UN AI Resolution
First-ever UN General Assembly resolution on AI. Adopted unanimously with 125 co-sponsors (US-led). Establishes human rights as applicable to AI lifecycle, encourages regulatory frameworks, and calls for bridging AI divides between countries. Non-binding but sets global normative expectations.
ISO 42001
First certifiable international standard for AI management systems. Uses Plan-Do-Check-Act methodology. Third-party certification available; major AI systems have achieved certification.
UNICEF AI for Children
Most specific international guidance on children and AI. Ten requirements for child-centered AI including development/wellbeing support, data/privacy protection, and safety.
Brunei PDPO
Brunei's personal data protection order requiring DPIA and imposing penalties up to 10% Brunei turnover or $1M.
India DPDP Act
STRICTEST children's provisions in APAC. Children = under 18; verifiable parental consent MANDATORY; PROHIBITION on tracking, behavioral monitoring, targeted advertising to children.