Denmark AI Act
Danish Act on Supplementary Provisions to the AI Regulation (Lov om supplerende bestemmelser til forordningen om kunstig intelligens)
First EU member state to fully implement the EU AI Act. Designates three competent authorities, establishes penalty framework aligned with EU maximums, and grants inspection/enforcement powers. Does not add material requirements beyond EU AI Act.
Jurisdiction
Denmark
Enacted
May 8, 2025
Effective
Aug 2, 2025
Enforcement
Danish Agency for Digital Government (coordinating authority); Danish Data Protection Agency (biometric/GDPR); Danish Court Authority (judicial AI)
Parliament adopted May 8, 2025; law dated May 14, 2025; effective August 2, 2025. First EU member state to complete AI Act implementation.
Retsinformation (Official)Why It Matters
First complete EU AI Act national implementation. Demonstrates enforcement model other member states will follow. Precedent for penalty application.
Recent Developments
Denmark first to complete national AI Act implementation, ahead of August 2025 EU deadline for authority designation. Sets precedent for other member states.
At a Glance
Applies to
Harms addressed
Requires
Who Must Comply
- AI system providers operating in Denmark
- AI system deployers in Denmark
- Does not apply to Faroe Islands or Greenland
Safety Provisions
- Implements all EU AI Act prohibited practices
- Inspection and information collection powers
- Compliance orders and temporary prohibition powers
- Five-year limitation period for violations
Exemptions
Faroe Islands and Greenland Exemption
Act does not apply to Faroe Islands or Greenland
- • Location in Faroe Islands or Greenland
Compliance & Enforcement
Key Dates
Aug 2, 2025
All provisions take effect, aligned with EU AI Act Article 113
Penalties
€35M or 7% revenue (whichever higher)
View on map
Denmark
Focus Areas
Cite This
APA
Denmark. (2025). Danish Act on Supplementary Provisions to the AI Regulation (Lov om supplerende bestemmelser til forordningen om kunstig intelligens).
Related Regulations
Finland AI Act
Finland's EU AI Act implementation using decentralized supervision model. Traficom serves as single point of contact and coordination authority. Ten market surveillance authorities share enforcement across sectors. New Sanctions Board handles fines over EUR 100,000.
Hungary AI Act
Hungary's comprehensive AI law implementing the EU AI Act. Designates the National Media and Infocommunications Authority (NMHH) as the primary supervisory authority, with sectoral regulators for specific domains.
Norway AI Act
Norway implementing full EU AI Act through EEA Agreement. Most comprehensively regulated non-EU jurisdiction for AI. Also implementing Digital Services Act with some Norwegian additions.
CA AB 2246
Repeals and replaces the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act. Requires a business providing an online service, product or feature likely to be accessed by children to estimate the age of child users with a reasonable level of certainty or extend child protections to all users, to configure high-privacy defaults, and to take reasonable steps to prevent specified harms including severe psychological harm. Removes the exceptions to the data-collection prohibitions, lets children void contracts entered through manipulative design features, and states that it creates no private right of action.
EU DSA Minors Guidelines
Commission guidelines under DSA Article 28(1) establishing measures for online platforms to protect minors, including age assurance, default privacy settings, anti-addictive design restrictions, recommender system safeguards, and protections against grooming and exploitation.
EU Kids Act (Proposed)
Commission proposal for an EU regulation on minors' online safety that would set a harmonised minimum age of 15 for autonomous accounts on risky social networking and video-sharing services, impose safety-by-design duties on those services, online games, app stores, AI companions and general conversational chatbots, and lay down EU-wide rules for privacy-preserving age assurance. Providers of AI companions and general conversational chatbots would have to avoid designs and behaviours that simulate interpersonal relationships likely to create emotional dependency in minors, disable use of a minor's prior interactions by default, gate access for under-13s behind guardian tools, and test and monitor their systems for risks to minors' health, safety and wellbeing.
Last updated January 23, 2026. Verify against primary sources before relying on this information.