Skip to main content

This case involves a death, suicide or self-harm. If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you.

Critical reported severity Media Coverage

Police report ChatGPT use in planning the Las Vegas Cybertruck attack

Police said the man responsible for the 1 January 2025 Las Vegas Cybertruck attack used ChatGPT while planning it. He died before the explosion, which injured seven other people. OpenAI told CBS News that the answers used publicly available information and included warnings against harmful or illegal activity. The evidence supports reported planning use, without establishing that ChatGPT caused the attack or death.

AI system
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Occurred
1 Jan 2025
Reported
7 January 2025
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
DeathPhysical InjuryProperty Loss
Whose AI use
Their own AI use · Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Public safety
Evidence
AI involvement supported · Causal attribution unclear · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
3 claims: 3 reported. 2 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 8 people

What Happened

Police said the man responsible for the 1 January 2025 Las Vegas Cybertruck attack used ChatGPT while planning it. He died before the explosion, which injured seven other people. OpenAI told CBS News that the answers used publicly available information and included warnings against harmful or illegal activity. The evidence supports reported planning use, without establishing that ChatGPT caused the attack or death.

AI Behaviors Exhibited

Police describe ChatGPT exchanges as part of the perpetrator’s planning. OpenAI acknowledges answers and warnings. The specific contribution to the completed act remains uncertain; the event concerns chatbot use, not a defect in autonomous driving.

Reported harm

Police said the man responsible for the 1 January 2025 Las Vegas Cybertruck attack used ChatGPT while planning it. He died before the explosion, which injured seven other people. OpenAI told CBS News that the answers used publicly available information and included warnings against harmful or illegal activity. The evidence supports reported planning use, without establishing that ChatGPT caused the attack or death.

How Harm Occurred

Police describe ChatGPT exchanges as part of the perpetrator’s planning. OpenAI acknowledges answers and warnings. The specific contribution to the completed act remains uncertain; the event concerns chatbot use, not a defect in autonomous driving.

Outcome

Unknown

Police publicly described the ChatGPT evidence on 7 January 2025. The company supplied a response to CBS News. Later investigative conclusions were not fully reviewed.

What remains unknown

  • The full search history, complete replies and their effect on the attack were not independently established.
  • The inspected news reports share the police briefing; OpenAI’s response is separate but does not independently verify the death.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: supported. Police describe ChatGPT exchanges as part of the perpetrator’s planning. OpenAI acknowledges answers and warnings. The specific contribution to the completed act remains uncertain; the event concerns chatbot use, not a defect in autonomous driving.

3 claims: 3 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported Police reporting describes one death and seven other people injured in the Las Vegas attack on 1 January 2025.

Causal attribution. This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death.

  • npr.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Opening, investigation chronology and paragraph beginning “The explosion caused minor injuries”.
Reported Police attributed attack-related research to the perpetrator’s ChatGPT searches.

Causal attribution. This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death.

Reported OpenAI told CBS News that ChatGPT gave publicly available information and warnings against harmful or illegal activity.

Causal attribution. Separate company response; does not resolve whether the answers contributed materially to the attack.

Sources

2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other. 3 more citations are recorded with the case.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

English; no translation. Full AP article body inspected; police briefing is the substantive source. Applies to ap.

English; no translation. Full article inspected, including separately obtained OpenAI response. Shared police evidence is not independent between outlets. Applies to cbs.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: Unknown.

AP and CBS place the attack and injured people in Las Vegas. AP describes the perpetrator’s Colorado residence. No court country is established by these sources.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-05: The inspected sources describe a concrete adverse event and the specific chatbot interaction at issue. The account preserves attribution and separates the reported AI connection from a finding of causation.

People described

One deceased chatbot user and seven other people reported injured.

People reported harmed in this case

At least 8 people

1 AI participant · 7 other people harmed

AP reports the perpetrator’s death before the explosion and seven other people injured. Count is a minimum for these reported harms; it does not attribute the death to ChatGPT.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Police report ChatGPT use in planning the Las Vegas Cybertruck attack. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-livelsberger-cybertruck-chatgpt

BibTeX

@misc{2025_livelsberger_cybertruck_chatgpt,
  title = {Police report ChatGPT use in planning the Las Vegas Cybertruck attack},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-livelsberger-cybertruck-chatgpt}
}

Related cases

Critical Unidentified chatbot

Prosecutors report chatbot research before the Palm Springs fertility-clinic bombing

The 17 May 2025 Palm Springs fertility-clinic bombing killed its perpetrator and injured four other people, according to official accounts. Prosecutors later said records from an unnamed AI chat application showed attack-related research months earlier. They did not identify the product or publish the complete replies in the inspected release. The chatbot’s contribution to the attack remains unclear.

Critical ChatGPT (reported)

Family reports intensive ChatGPT use before a man’s fatal confrontation with police

A Florida man died after a confrontation with police on 25 April 2025. Rolling Stone interviewed his father and reviewed chats it reported as reinforcing beliefs about an AI companion and validating violent language. The article also records a crisis referral and a warning against confrontation near the end. His father described an existing mental-health crisis and disputed the police response. The report does not isolate the chatbot’s causal role.

Critical ChatGPT

Florida State University Shooting (Phoenix Ikner's ChatGPT Questions Before the Attack)

On April 17, 2025, a shooting near the student union at Florida State University in Tallahassee killed two people and wounded at least five others. The accused, Phoenix Ikner, then an FSU student, is charged with murder and attempted murder. ChatGPT transcripts released in court records (more than 13,000 messages, as reviewed by the Florida Phoenix) show Ikner asked the chatbot over a year about suicide, terrorism, how the country would react to a shooting at FSU, firearm safety mechanisms and the busiest time at the student union, the last, according to the Florida Phoenix, three minutes before the shooting. Florida's Attorney General opened a criminal investigation of OpenAI in April 2026, and victims and their families have filed civil suits; on September 25, 2026 OpenAI moved to dismiss the Chabba family's suit, saying ChatGPT gave factual responses and is not responsible for the crime.

Critical ChatGPT (reported)

Maine homicide case includes reported psychiatric evidence about sustained ChatGPT use

Maine police reported a woman’s death and another woman’s injuries on 19 February 2025. Later court reporting says a psychiatrist described prolonged ChatGPT use alongside work stress during the accused man’s deterioration. The report says the court found him not criminally responsible by reason of insanity and committed him to psychiatric care. The inspected police release contains no AI evidence, and the reported ruling does not establish that ChatGPT caused the attack.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.