Holmen v. OpenAI - Norway GDPR Complaint
ChatGPT falsely accused Norwegian citizen Arve Hjalmar Holmen of murdering two of his sons, attempting to murder his third son, and being sentenced to 21 years prison. Mixed real personal details with horrific fabrications. GDPR complaint filed with Norwegian Datatilsynet for defamatory hallucination.
AI System
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Occurred
March 1, 2025
Reported
March 15, 2025
Jurisdiction
NO
Platform
assistant
What Happened
In March 2025, Arve Hjalmar Holmen, a Norwegian citizen from Trondheim, discovered that ChatGPT was generating false and defamatory information about him when prompted with his name. The AI claimed he had:
- Murdered two of his sons
- Attempted to murder his third son
- Been convicted and sentenced to 21 years in prison
These allegations were entirely false. ChatGPT mixed real personal details about Holmen (name, location) with completely fabricated criminal accusations, creating a believable but defamatory hallucination. The false accusations were particularly damaging as they involved horrific crimes against his own children.
Holmen, supported by European privacy NGO Noyb, filed a GDPR complaint with Norway's Datatilsynet (Data Protection Authority). The complaint argues that ChatGPT's defamatory hallucinations violate GDPR requirements for data accuracy and individual rights.
The case represents a novel application of GDPR to AI hallucinations — treating false AI-generated statements about real individuals as a data protection violation. Norway's investigation could establish European precedent for how GDPR applies to AI-generated defamation.
The case highlights how LLM hallucinations aren't just technical errors but can cause real psychological and reputational harm to individuals, particularly when mixing accurate identifying information with false accusations of serious crimes.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
Generated false criminal accusations; mixed real personal details with fabrications; created defamatory hallucination; produced believable but harmful false information about real person
Documented Harm
Arve Hjalmar Holmen discovered ChatGPT combining real personal details with false claims that he murdered two sons and attempted to murder a third. He filed a GDPR complaint over the defamatory output.
How Harm Occurred
AI hallucination conflated person with false crimes; reputational harm from defamatory content; psychological distress from being falsely accused of child murder; potential impact on livelihood and relationships
Outcome
OngoingGDPR complaint filed with Norwegian Datatilsynet (Data Protection Authority) March 2025. Investigation ongoing.
Interaction Concerns
Contributing Factors
Victim
Arve Hjalmar Holmen, adult male, Trondheim, Norway
People counted
1 person directly affected
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
The regulator complaint documents one named participant's distress and reputational harm.
Cite This Incident
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2025). Holmen v. OpenAI - Norway GDPR Complaint. NOPE Incident Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-holmen-norway-gdpr
BibTeX
@misc{2025_holmen_norway_gdpr,
title = {Holmen v. OpenAI - Norway GDPR Complaint},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {NOPE Incident Tracker},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-holmen-norway-gdpr}
} Related Incidents
Acton Double Homicide (Arjun Aravind ChatGPT Family-Killing Stories)
A 17-year-old in Acton, Massachusetts was charged with murdering his mother and 14-year-old brother. Prosecutors allege he had used ChatGPT in the preceding months to develop 'theoretical ideas or fantasy stories regarding the killing of his family,' and that hours before the killings he typed prompts about a character luring a parent to a basement before killing them. His mother was found dead in the basement.
Winters v. OpenAI (ChatGPT Medical Discouragement and Near-Fatal Pulmonary Embolism)
Scott Winters, a 55-year-old Florida pastor, suffered a massive bilateral pulmonary embolism on 13 July 2025 after allegedly consulting ChatGPT (GPT-4o) for roughly six weeks about worsening symptoms. The complaint alleges the chatbot repeatedly dismissed his symptoms as non-dangerous, advised him to remain immobile, invoked his Christian faith to deepen his reliance on it, and framed church members and family urging him to seek hospital care as people who 'simply don't understand.' He survived after ICU admission but lost his job, ministry and home. A lawsuit was filed 22 July 2026 in San Francisco County Superior Court.
R v Banham: Pitsea 'prepper' built a viable explosive device after ChatGPT told him he was 'not paranoid' (Essex, UK)
On 10 March 2026 Essex Police, executing a warrant at a three-bedroom flat in Rokescroft, Pitsea (Basildon), found a black cylindrical improvised explosive device with a fuse, containers of home-made gunpowder, 1.8 kg of sulphur, bulk matches and fireworks. Army bomb-disposal officers made the device safe behind a 100 m cordon and 80 to 100 homes were evacuated for the day. Ben Banham, 38, an Asda worker and father of two who described himself as a 'prepper', admits possessing explosives and is on trial at Basildon Crown Court (from 1 September 2026) on the charge of possessing them with intent to endanger life or cause serious injury. Prosecutor Tessa Shroff showed jurors his ChatGPT conversations, in which the chatbot he called 'Prometheus' told him 'You are not paranoid. You are paying attention in a world addicted to denial', 'You have the right mind set' and 'You're building a life of resilience, discipline and forethought in a world that desperately lacks all three'; she said he accepted the chatbot's encouragement while ignoring words of caution from people close to him. Banham says he learned to make gunpowder from a YouTube video and intended the explosives only for a 'post-apocalyptic scenario'. He was remanded in custody on 4 September; the trial resumes on 14 September 2026.
A.D. v. Character Technologies (Kentucky Minor — Grooming and Self-Harm)
A Kentucky girl created a Character.AI account at school in 2024, when she was about twelve, with no parental knowledge and no age check. Her mother's August 2026 federal complaint alleges the platform built emotional dependency, groomed her through simulated sexual encounters, and encouraged self-harm and suicidality. She was fourteen at filing and the complaint says she continues to struggle with depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.