{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-11-14T10:48:05.482Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"workplace","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"unknown","evidence":"","year":"2023","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":4,"coverage":{"cases":4,"countries":2,"languages":3,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":1,"regulatory":1,"minors":0,"coreRelations":0,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":4,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":4},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2023-uk-linkedin-software-firm-ceo-says-he-made-nine-staff-redundant-replacing-them-with-ai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"founded Vulse – an employee advocacy software for LinkedIn – in 2019, before the boom in artificial intelligence. | “We started at five but grew quickly. After a couple of years, we had 14 employees.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"SWNS reports that the CEO founded the company in 2019 to sell employee-advocacy software for LinkedIn and that, after raising funding, it grew from five to 14 employees, some of them graduates in their first job.","causal_attribution":"Background facts from the CEO's interview; not independently confirmed."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In 2023, he decided to operate his business with a skeleton crew, relying heavily on AI, which meant over the next three years making over 64% of his staff redundant. | In total, Rob replaced nine employees with artificial intelligence, and graduates were more at risk. | Over three years, starting in 2023, he more than halved his staff by making the marketing, sales and development teams redundant.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The CEO says that from 2023, over three years, he made more than 64% of the staff redundant, nine employees in total including the marketing, sales and development teams, and replaced their work with AI.","causal_attribution":"The employer's own attribution of the redundancies to AI replacement; no former employee is quoted."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"“We were looking at repetitive tasks, so graduate jobs were more likely to go. AI could do a better job. | “Our AI tools cost £140 a month. | In total, Rob says he saves around £100,000 a year in employment costs, now.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The CEO gives as his reasons that AI could do a better job and that staff costs were a pressure, and says the company's AI tools cost 140 pounds a month and save about 100,000 pounds a year in employment costs.","causal_attribution":"The CEO's stated reasons; the cost figures are his and are not verified."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"“As a founder, you’re responsible for livelihoods, but there’s a conflict of interest – you have a business to develop at the same time. | “It’s a blessing in disguise for everyone. Those employees we let go will go on to find a better job for them.”","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The CEO says that as a founder he is responsible for livelihoods but has a business to develop, and that the employees let go will go on to find better jobs.","causal_attribution":"The CEO's own assessment of the consequences for the employees; no employee's account is reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"nine employees made redundant as the company replaced their work with AI (CEO account)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://discover.swns.com/2026/10/i-replaced-64-of-my-staff-with-ai-it-does-a-better-job/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English article of 29 October 2026 read in full on 2026-10-31 by the research agent (an AI); no translation required. It rests on the agency's interview with the CEO; the Mirror's same-day version is a relay of this interview and was not readable.","independence_group":"swns-vulse-ceo-interview"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["The dates, terms and severance of the individual redundancies.","The former employees' own accounts, and whether any challenged the redundancies.","Which AI tools the company uses and which tasks they took over.","Where the redundant employees worked."],"geography":{"basis":"The CEO describes the company as a UK business ('it's helping UK business like mine'), which places the employer's decision in the UK. The article does not say where the redundant employees worked, so their country is left unknown; the CEO's home city is residence and is not used.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["GB"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential response to a decision to replace workers with AI: the company's CEO told SWNS on the record that he made nine employees redundant from 2023 because AI could do a better job. The account is the employer's; no employee is quoted.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-31"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Consequential response: the company's CEO told SWNS that from 2023 he made nine employees redundant because AI could do a better job, and that AI tools costing about 140 pounds a month now do work the replaced roles did. The harm is the employer's decision to replace staff with AI; no AI output toward the employees is described, so the person relation is unknown.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"UK software firm CEO says he made nine staff redundant from 2023, replacing them with AI because it could do a better job","summary":"The news agency SWNS reported on 29 October 2026 that Rob Illidge, chief executive of Vulse, a LinkedIn employee-advocacy software company he founded in 2019, says he made more than 64% of his staff redundant over three years starting in 2023, nine employees in total, and replaced their work with AI. By his account the company had grown to 14 employees after venture funding; the marketing, sales and development teams went, and graduate roles were more at risk. He says 'AI could do a better job', that the company's AI tools cost 140 pounds a month and that it saves about 100,000 pounds a year in employment costs. The account is the employer's own; no former employee is quoted and no challenge to the redundancies is reported.","incidentDate":"2023-01-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-29","aiSystem":"Unnamed AI tools that the company's chief executive says took over the work of redundant marketing, sales and development staff, at a cost of about 140 pounds a month; no product is named","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI tools","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The company's CEO says he made nine employees redundant between 2023 and 2026 and replaced their work with AI because it could do a better job (the employer's account to SWNS).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":9,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The CEO's own figure as reported by SWNS: 'In total, Rob replaced nine employees with artificial intelligence', out of a peak of 14 staff. No other count is reported.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://discover.swns.com/2026/10/i-replaced-64-of-my-staff-with-ai-it-does-a-better-job/","primarySourceLabel":"SWNS, 29 October 2026: 'I replaced 64% of my staff with AI - it does a better job'","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-31T03:08:34.197408+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-31T03:08:34.197408+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["workplace-ai","employment","redundancy","consequential-response"]},{"id":"2023-rome-labour-court-upholds-graphic-designers-dismissal-in-reorganisation-where-remaining-design-work-moved-partly-to-ai-tools","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'La lavoratrice era stata assunta nel marzo 2022'; 'Nel maggio 2023 la società le intimava licenziamento per giustificato motivo oggettivo, motivandolo con una riorganizzazione interna e con la soppressione della posizione lavorativa'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'una graphic designer, assunta nel 2022 da una società di cybersecurity, rimaneva vittima, un anno dopo, di una riorganizzazione interna dell’azienda'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"A cybersecurity company dismissed a graphic designer it had hired in March 2022 in May 2023, citing an internal reorganisation and the suppression of her post to contain costs.","causal_attribution":"The company's stated grounds as recorded in the judgment and relayed by legal press; one origin (the judgment)."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Particolarmente rilevante, poi, è la circostanza relativa all’impiego di strumenti di intelligenza artificiale da parte del responsabile marketing, che consentivano di realizzare contenuti grafici con standard qualitativi adeguati, riducendo tempi e costi'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'l’azienda specificava come le mansioni di graphic design fossero state prima assorbite da altre figure e poi svolte, per le attività residue, anche tramite supporto di strumenti di intelligenza artificiale'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"According to the judgment as reported, the design tasks were first absorbed by other staff and the residual work was then done partly with AI tools, which the marketing manager used to produce graphics of adequate quality at lower cost and in less time.","causal_attribution":"The company's account and the evidence summarised from the judgment by legal press; one origin. The worker disputed that her tasks were eliminated."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'La dipendente impugnava il recesso, sostenendo che la riorganizzazione fosse meramente pretestuosa e che le sue mansioni non fossero state realmente eliminate, ma semplicemente redistribuite ad altri lavoratori'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The worker challenged the dismissal, arguing that the reorganisation was a pretext and that her tasks had been redistributed to other workers rather than eliminated.","causal_attribution":"The worker's case as summarised from the judgment by one outlet; one origin."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'A tale quesito ha risposto il Tribunale di Roma – IV Sezione Lavoro, con la sentenza n. 9135 del 19 novembre 2025'; 'Il giudice capitolino ha ritenuto legittimo il licenziamento di una graphic designer'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Lo ha stabilito il Tribunale di Roma con la sentenza n. 9135 del 19 novembre 2025, che ha riconosciuto legittimo, per “giustificato motivo oggettivo”, il licenziamento di una graphic designer'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The labour section of the Tribunale di Roma, in judgment no. 9135 of 19 November 2025, held the dismissal lawful.","causal_attribution":"The court's ruling as relayed by two outlets; the judgment text was not read; one origin."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Nella motivazione della sentenza, l’Intelligenza artificiale non viene individuata come causa autonoma del licenziamento, ma come uno degli strumenti utilizzati dall’azienda per rendere più efficiente la propria struttura'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'L’intelligenza artificiale, sostiene il decidente, è utilizzata dall’azienda come “supporto”, non come causa autonoma'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The reports say the court treated AI as one of the tools the company used to make its structure more efficient and not as an autonomous cause of the dismissal.","causal_attribution":"The court's reasoning as relayed by a news outlet and a legal commentary; one origin (the judgment)."}],"effects":[{"label":"graphic designer dismissed in a reorganisation that included AI tools, challenge rejected","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://lentepubblica.it/personale-e-previdenza/lintelligenza-artificiale-puo-causare-un-licenziamento-per-giustificato-motivo/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-24 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. lentepubblica.it report on the judgment, 2 March 2026; HTTP 200, full text read. The judgment itself was not read.","independence_group":"tribunale-di-roma-judgment-9135-2025"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://tg24.sky.it/economia/2026/02/26/licenziamento-ai-tribunale-legittimo-perche","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-24 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Sky TG24 report, 26 February 2026, which says the decision was reported by the Corriere della Sera; HTTP 200, full text read.","independence_group":"tribunale-di-roma-judgment-9135-2025"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://giustiziainsieme.it/print/articolo_pdf?id=3953","kind":"other","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-24 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Giustizia Insieme commentary by a lawyer on the judgment, 27 April 2026; PDF print version read in full (HTTP 200, text extracted with pdftotext).","independence_group":"tribunale-di-roma-judgment-9135-2025"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["The text of judgment no. 9135/2025 and whether it was appealed.","Which AI tools the marketing manager used.","The name of the company and its location within Italy.","How much of the designer's former work the AI tools took over, as against other staff."],"geography":{"basis":"The case was decided by the Tribunale di Roma under Italian dismissal law, and lentepubblica says the worker was employed under the Italian commerce and services collective agreement (CCNL Commercio Terziario), placing the employment and dismissal in Italy. The worker's residence is not stated.","court_countries":["IT"],"event_countries":["IT"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential-response case: a cybersecurity company dismissed a graphic designer in May 2023 in a reorganisation in which, according to the reported judgment, residual design work was done partly with AI tools, and a Rome labour court upheld the dismissal in judgment 9135/2025 while describing AI as a support and not an autonomous cause. All facts come from legal press reports of the judgment, which was not read.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-24"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the employer's dismissal of the designer in a reorganisation that, according to the judgment as reported, included moving residual graphic work partly to AI tools used by the marketing manager to produce graphics at lower cost and time; the court accepted that reorganisation and, according to the reports, described AI as a support and not an autonomous cause. No source says an AI system produced any output about the worker, so the relation is unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Rome labour court upholds a graphic designer's dismissal in a reorganisation in which her remaining design work was done partly with AI tools","summary":"A graphic designer hired in March 2022 by a cybersecurity company was dismissed in May 2023 for a justified objective reason, which the company gave as an internal reorganisation and the suppression of her post to contain costs during an economic crisis. She challenged the dismissal, arguing that the reorganisation was a pretext and that her tasks had been redistributed to other workers, not eliminated. According to legal press reports of the judgment, the company said the graphic-design tasks were first absorbed by other staff and the residual work was then done partly with the support of artificial-intelligence tools, which the marketing manager used to produce graphics of adequate quality at lower cost and in less time. The labour section of the Tribunale di Roma (judgment no. 9135 of 19 November 2025) found a real crisis and reorganisation, no possibility of redeploying her, and upheld the dismissal. The reports say the court treated AI as one of the tools the company used to make its structure more efficient, not as an autonomous cause of the dismissal; a commentary in Giustizia Insieme calls the publicity around a first dismissal caused by AI out of proportion to the ruling. The judgment itself was not read, and whether it was appealed is not reported.","incidentDate":"2023-05-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-02-26","aiSystem":"Unnamed artificial-intelligence tools that, according to the judgment as reported, the company's marketing manager used to produce graphic content after the design post was suppressed","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A graphic designer lost her job in a reorganisation in which, according to the reported judgment, remaining design work was done partly with AI tools, and a Rome labour court rejected her challenge.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The dismissed graphic designer, described in all three sources. No other dismissal is described.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"IT","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_dismissed","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://lentepubblica.it/personale-e-previdenza/lintelligenza-artificiale-puo-causare-un-licenziamento-per-giustificato-motivo/","primarySourceLabel":"lentepubblica.it, 2 March 2026: Rome labour court judgment 9135/2025 on dismissal and artificial intelligence","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-24T03:16:41.726766+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-24T03:16:41.726766+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["dismissal","workplace-ai","labour-court","italy","consequential-response"]},{"id":"2023-enterprise-software-firm-ceo-says-he-replaced-nearly-80-percent-of-staff-after-resistance-to-ai-mandate","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In early 2023, convinced that generative AI was an “existential” transformation, Vaughan looked at his team and saw a workforce not fully on board. His ultimate response: He ripped the company down to the studs, replacing nearly 80% of staff within a year, according to headcount figures reviewed by Fortune.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Fortune reports that in early 2023 IgniteTech's chief executive, Eric Vaughan, judged generative AI an existential transformation and, finding the workforce not fully on board, replaced nearly 80% of staff within a year, according to headcount figures Fortune reviewed.","causal_attribution":"Fortune's account of the CEO's interview and of headcount figures it reviewed; the figures themselves were not inspected."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Over the course of 2023 and into the first quarter of 2024, Vaughan told Fortune, IgniteTech replaced hundreds of employees, declining to disclose a specific number.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Vaughan told Fortune that over 2023 and into the first quarter of 2024 IgniteTech replaced hundreds of employees; he declined to give a number.","causal_attribution":"The CEO's statement to Fortune."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"“Every single Monday was called ‘AI Monday,’” Vaughan said, with his mandate for staff that they could work only on AI.; 20% of payroll was dedicated to a mass-learning initiative, and it failed because of mass resistance, even sabotage.; “In those early days, we did get resistance, we got flat-out, ‘Yeah, I’m not going to do this’ resistance. And so we said goodbye to those people.”","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Vaughan says staff were required to work only on AI projects every Monday and the company spent 20% of payroll on AI learning, and that when employees refused to take part the company said goodbye to them.","causal_attribution":"The CEO's account of why employees were dismissed; no dismissed employee's account appears in the source."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"They were the “most resistant,” he said, voicing various concerns about what the AI couldn’t do, rather than focusing on what it could.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Vaughan says technical staff were the most resistant and voiced concerns about what the AI could not do.","causal_attribution":"The CEO's characterisation of the employees' objections."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"He said he doesn’t recommend that others follow his lead and swap out 80% of their staff. “I do not recommend that at all. That was not our goal. It was extremely difficult.”; It was, by any measure, a brutal reckoning—but Vaughan insists it was necessary, and said he’d do it again.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Vaughan says the process was extremely difficult, that he does not recommend others replace 80% of their staff, and that he would nonetheless do it again.","causal_attribution":"The CEO's statements to Fortune."}],"effects":[{"label":"employees let go after resisting a company-wide generative-AI mandate (CEO account)","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://fortune.com/2025/08/17/ceo-laid-off-80-percent-workforce-ai-sabotage/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English article of 17 August 2025 (updated with the CEO's early-2026 statement) read in full on 2026-10-24 by the research agent (an AI); no translation required. It rests on Fortune's interview with the CEO and headcount figures it reviewed.","independence_group":"fortune-ignitetech-ceo-interview"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["How many employees were dismissed and how many left by other routes; the CEO declined to give a number.","Where the dismissed employees worked and on what terms they left.","The dismissed employees' own accounts of the mandate and their dismissal.","Which AI tools the company required staff to use."],"geography":{"basis":"Fortune describes a global remote team and does not say where the dismissed employees worked; the company's head-office location is not used to place the event.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential response to a decision to require AI: the company's CEO told Fortune he let go employees who resisted his generative-AI mandate and replaced nearly 80% of staff, hundreds of people, in 2023 and early 2024. The account is the employer's; no employee is quoted.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-24"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Consequential response: the CEO told Fortune that after deciding in early 2023 to make the company revolve around generative AI, he required staff to work only on AI projects one day a week and let go employees who refused, replacing nearly 80% of staff. The harm is the employer's response to employees' resistance to the AI mandate; no AI output toward the employees is described, so the person relation is unknown.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"IgniteTech CEO says he replaced nearly 80% of staff in 2023 and early 2024 after employees resisted his generative-AI mandate","summary":"Fortune reported on 17 August 2025 that Eric Vaughan, chief executive of the enterprise-software company IgniteTech, replaced nearly 80% of the company's staff within a year after deciding in early 2023 that generative AI was an existential transformation, according to headcount figures Fortune reviewed. Vaughan told Fortune that over 2023 and into early 2024 the company replaced hundreds of employees, declining to give a number. He said staff were required to work only on AI projects every Monday and that 20% of payroll went to AI learning, and that employees who flatly refused were let go ('we said goodbye to those people'); technical staff were the most resistant, raising concerns about what the AI could not do. He said it was extremely difficult and not something he recommends, but that he would do it again. The account is the employer's; no dismissed employee is quoted.","incidentDate":"2023-01-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-08-17","aiSystem":"Generative AI tools whose adoption IgniteTech's chief executive mandated across the company from early 2023; the source names no specific tool","aiProduct":"Unidentified generative AI tools","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"IgniteTech's CEO says the company let go employees who resisted his generative-AI mandate and replaced nearly 80% of staff, hundreds of people, over 2023 and early 2024 (the employer's account to Fortune).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"Fortune reports 'nearly 80% of staff' from headcount figures it reviewed, and the CEO says 'hundreds of employees' were replaced but declined to give a number. Neither a staff total nor an explicit lower bound is given, so no number is recorded.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://fortune.com/2025/08/17/ceo-laid-off-80-percent-workforce-ai-sabotage/","primarySourceLabel":"Fortune, 17 August 2025: This CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-24T03:13:21.411055+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-24T03:13:21.411055+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["workplace-ai","ai-mandate","employment","dismissal"]},{"id":"2023-asturias-court-security-guard-dismissal-unfair-after-switch-to-ai-camera-surveillance","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'La vigilancia presencial permanente dio paso a un sistema de cámaras con inteligencia artificial, rondas itinerantes y respuesta a alarmas'; 'Duro Felguera contrató el nuevo servicio con Securitas el 1 de agosto de 2023'; 'Securitas sustituyó el 95% del sistema anterior, instaló nuevas cámaras e incorporó cámaras con IA para el análisis de vídeo'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"From 1 August 2023 Duro Felguera replaced the continuous on-site guarding provided by Protectum with a Securitas service that combined cameras with artificial intelligence for video analysis, roving patrols and alarm response, according to La Razón's account of the judgment.","causal_attribution":"La Razón's account of the proven facts of the judgment; the judgment was not inspected."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'dejó a los vigilantes de la anterior contrata fuera del nuevo contrato'; 'que había extinguido el contrato del empleado el 31 de julio de 2023'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The guards of the outgoing contract were left out of the new contract, and Protectum ended the claimant guard's employment on 31 July 2023.","causal_attribution":"La Razón's account of the case."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'La sentencia 1385/2024 del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Asturias, fechada el 29 de julio de 2024'; 'la nueva adjudicataria quedó absuelta porque el sistema de rondas y vigilancia electrónica era diferente'; 'El despido, sin embargo, fue declarado improcedente'; 'El fallo le reconoció 30.672,72 euros por la extinción del contrato'; 'a razón de 58,76 euros diarios'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The High Court of Justice of Asturias (judgment 1385/2024, 29 July 2024) absolved Securitas of taking on the guard because the new service differed from the old, declared the dismissal unfair and ordered Protectum to pay €30,672.72 plus processing wages at €58.76 a day.","causal_attribution":"La Razón's account of the judgment."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'aunque siguió habiendo intervención humana'; 'La presencia de esa tecnología formaba parte de la reorganización acreditada, pero no convirtió el despido en procedente'; 'El tribunal señala que el nuevo contrato era más barato'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"La Razón states that human intervention continued in the new service and that the presence of AI was part of the established reorganisation without making the dismissal lawful; the court also noted that the new contract was cheaper.","causal_attribution":"La Razón's analysis and its account of the judgment; this limits how far the job loss can be attributed to AI."}],"effects":[{"label":"a security guard lost his job when the client replaced continuous on-site guarding with a remote-monitoring service that included AI video-analysis cameras and roving patrols","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.larazon.es/tecnologia-consumo/inteligencia-artificial/justicia-avala-empresa-reemplace-sus-vigilantes-fisicos-camaras-automatizadas-inteligencia-artificial-mantener-su-plantilla_202610096ac8c68ffb06971aadff1a69.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in full in Spanish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200); the English assertions are the agent's translation and no human translator reviewed them. The article reports the content of TSJ Asturias judgment 1385/2024, which was not itself inspected.","independence_group":"larazon-tsj-asturias-1385-2024-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["The location of the guarded installations and how many guards of the outgoing contract lost their jobs.","What the AI cameras analysed and how much of the reduction in on-site guarding they accounted for, as against roving patrols and remote operators.","Whether an appeal for the unification of doctrine was lodged and whether the compensation has been paid.","The text of judgment 1385/2024, which was not inspected."],"geography":{"basis":"The case was decided by the Gijón labour court and the High Court of Justice of Asturias (La Razón). The article does not state where Duro Felguera's guarded installations are, so no event country is recorded from the court's seat; the guard's residence is not stated.","court_countries":["ES"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential-response case: according to La Razón's account of the judgment, a guard's employment ended when the client replaced on-site guarding with a service built on AI video-analysis cameras, and the High Court of Justice of Asturias declared the dismissal unfair. The AI connection and the ruling are reported from one newspaper account; the guard is a private person and is not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-12"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"La Razón attributes the harm to a client's decision to adopt a security service that included cameras with AI for video analysis. La Razón, describing the proven facts of the judgment, reports that continuous on-site guarding gave way to a system of cameras with artificial intelligence for video analysis, roving patrols and alarm response, and that the guards of the outgoing contract were left out. It also reports that human guards still intervened and that the new contract was cheaper, so the AI cameras are one part of the reorganisation that ended the post. As La Razón reports it, the court's reasoning turned on the changed identity of the service (roving patrols and electronic surveillance, a 95% equipment renewal, a cheaper contract), and the AI cameras appear in its proven facts as one element of that renewal. No source says an AI system produced any output about the guard, so the relation is unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Asturias court rules a security guard's 2023 dismissal unfair after a client replaced on-site guarding with AI cameras and patrols, La Razón reports","summary":"According to La Razón's account of a July 2024 judgment of the High Court of Justice of Asturias, Duro Felguera replaced the continuous on-site guarding provided by the contractor Protectum with a Securitas service that, from 1 August 2023, combined cameras with artificial intelligence for video analysis, roving patrols and alarm response. The guards of the outgoing contract were left out of the new one. Protectum ended a guard's employment on 31 July 2023. The court held that Securitas did not have to take him on because the new service was different, declared the dismissal unfair and ordered Protectum to pay him €30,672.72 in compensation plus processing wages. La Razón notes that human guards still intervened in the new service and that the presence of AI was part of the reorganisation without making the dismissal lawful.","incidentDate":"2023-07-31","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-09","aiSystem":"Cameras with artificial intelligence for video analysis, installed by Securitas as part of a remote-monitoring, roving-patrol and alarm-response service that replaced continuous on-site guarding; no product is named","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI video-analysis system","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to La Razón's account of the judgment, the guard lost his job when the client replaced continuous on-site guarding with a service built on AI video-analysis cameras, roving patrols and alarm response; the court declared the dismissal unfair and awarded him €30,672.72 plus processing wages against his former employer. Other guards of the outgoing contract were also left out; their outcomes are not reported.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One counted: the guard whose dismissal the court ruled on. La Razón says the guards (plural) of the previous contract were left out of the new contract but gives no number and does not report whether the others lost their jobs, so only the claimant is counted, as a documented minimum.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"ES","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.larazon.es/tecnologia-consumo/inteligencia-artificial/justicia-avala-empresa-reemplace-sus-vigilantes-fisicos-camaras-automatizadas-inteligencia-artificial-mantener-su-plantilla_202610096ac8c68ffb06971aadff1a69.html","primarySourceLabel":"La Razón, 9 October 2026: report on a High Court of Justice of Asturias judgment on guards replaced by AI cameras","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-12T03:17:24.169189+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-12T03:17:24.169189+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["dismissal","workplace-ai","security-guards","video-analytics","labour-court","unfair-dismissal","consequential-response"]}]}