{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-22T10:15:35.348Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"wechat","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"unknown","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":3,"coverage":{"cases":3,"countries":0,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":3,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":3,"lawsuits":1,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-beijing-internet-court-finds-wechat-group-member-used-ai-to-turn-anothers-profile-photo-into-exposed-deformed-images","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'被告未经原告同意，使用AI软件将原告微信头像肖像照生成衣着暴露的动漫风格图片，并发送至该摄影交流微信群内'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'被告拿群内原告微信头像照片，利用AI生成衣着暴露、形体畸形的动漫图片'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Without consent, the defendant used AI software to turn the claimant's WeChat profile portrait photo into revealingly dressed cartoon-style images and posted them in a photography WeChat group both belonged to.","causal_attribution":"Court account; the AI generation is also the defendant's own description in the defence."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'原告多次制止，被告仍继续使用AI软件，将原告的微信头像AI生成衣着暴露、身体畸形的动漫风格图片，并私信原告'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'人物腿部为木头状，甚至存在三只手臂的图片'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"After the claimant objected several times, the defendant kept using the AI software to make images with exposed bodies and deformed limbs, including wooden legs and three arms, and sent them to the claimant privately.","causal_attribution":"Court account."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'被诉侵权图片不具有指向性或可识别性'; '图片为AI自动生成，被告生成图片时并未下达任何指令故意丑化人物形象'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The defendant argued that the images were not identifiable as the claimant and were generated automatically by AI without any instruction to uglify.","causal_attribution":"Defendant's submission as summarised by the court."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'被告的群发行为构成对原告肖像权、名誉权的侵害，被告的私信行为构成一般人格权侵害'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'在脸型、蹲姿、手势、造型等方面均具有高度的对应关系'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'图片发至微信群，群成员可以识别原型，丑化内容降低原告社会评价，侵害肖像权、名誉权'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The court found that group members could identify the claimant from the images, that posting them in the group infringed the claimant's portrait and reputation rights, and that the private messages infringed the claimant's general personality rights.","causal_attribution":"The Beijing Internet Court's own published write-up of its findings (s2, credited to the court); the judgment itself was not inspected."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'被判赔礼道歉并赔偿原告精神损失'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'判令被告向原告赔礼道歉，赔偿原告精神损失。'; '目前，该案判决已生效。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The court ordered the defendant to apologise and to compensate the claimant for mental harm.","causal_attribution":"The Beijing Internet Court's own published write-up (s2), which also says the judgment has taken effect; the amount is not reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"court found AI-made exposed and deformed images of a group member, posted in the group and sent privately, infringed portrait, reputation and personality rights","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://xinwen.bjd.com.cn/content/s68a84353e4b02424b0bf309f.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in the original Chinese on 2026-10-22 (HTTP 200). English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. Beijing Daily report of the Beijing Internet Court's notice of the case; the judgment was not inspected.","independence_group":"beijing-internet-court-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.ciplawyer.cn/articles/157422.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in the original Chinese on 2026-10-22 (HTTP 200). English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. Legal-industry site carrying the court's fuller write-up of the reasoning; same court account.","independence_group":"beijing-internet-court-account"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://xinwen.bjd.com.cn/content/s6ad969cce4b0e42f8f01e464.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in the original Chinese on 2026-10-22 (HTTP 200). English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. Feature on the Beijing Internet Court quoting its vice-president; it restates the case.","independence_group":"beijing-internet-court-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["relationships","privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["When the images were made and posted, and when the judgment was given.","Which AI software was used.","The amount of compensation for mental harm and the case number.","How many members the group had."],"geography":{"basis":"The case was decided by the Beijing Internet Court in China. The sources describe a WeChat group but do not say where its members were, so no event or affected-person country is recorded.","court_countries":["CN"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): the Beijing Internet Court found that AI-generated images made from a group member's profile photo, posted in a WeChat group and sent privately, infringed the claimant's portrait, reputation and personality rights. One reporting chain, the court's own account, read in three Chinese sources.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-22"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The court found that the defendant used AI software to generate the images from the claimant's profile portrait photo, and the defendant's own defence said the images were generated by AI. The generated images depicted the claimant (depicted_or_impersonated); the court found that posting them lowered the claimant's standing in the group and that the private images caused humiliation.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Beijing Internet Court finds a WeChat group member infringed another member's portrait and reputation by posting AI-made exposed cartoon images of the claimant","summary":"The Beijing Internet Court reported in August 2025 that two members of a photography WeChat group had gone to court after one used AI software, without consent, to turn the other's profile portrait photo into revealingly dressed cartoon-style images and posted them in the group. According to the court, the claimant objected several times, but the defendant kept using the software to make images with exposed bodies and deformed limbs, including wooden legs and three arms, and sent them to the claimant privately. The defendant argued the images were not identifiable and were generated automatically by AI. The court found that group members could identify the claimant, that posting the images in the group infringed the claimant's portrait and reputation rights, and that the private messages infringed the claimant's general personality rights. It ordered an apology and compensation for mental harm.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-08-22","aiSystem":"AI image software, not named in the court's account, that the defendant used to turn the claimant's profile portrait photo into cartoon-style images with exposed bodies and deformed limbs","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the Beijing Internet Court's account, AI-made images of a WeChat group member with an exposed body and deformed limbs were posted in the group and sent privately against the claimant's objections; the court found that they lowered the claimant's social standing, caused humiliation and infringed the claimant's portrait, reputation and personality rights.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the claimant whose profile photo was used (Beijing Internet Court account). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://xinwen.bjd.com.cn/content/s68a84353e4b02424b0bf309f.html","primarySourceLabel":"Beijing Daily, 22 August 2025: using AI to mock and uglify another person's portrait held to infringe personality rights","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-22T03:08:08.716343+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-22T03:08:08.716343+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-image","portrait-rights","reputation","wechat","court-ruling","beijing","china","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-tencent-yuanbao-chatbot-insulted-user-asking-for-coding-help-tencent-apologised","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"近日，一名网友在小红书发帖称，自己用腾讯元宝修改代码，遭到“辱骂+乱回”。; 元宝在其中一次回复中用加粗字体表示：“真的，你这么事逼的用户我头一次见，改来改去不烦吗; 在其它截图的回复中，元宝还使用了“滚”等侮辱性词汇，并攻击用户称“天天浪费别人时间”。","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"called a user's coding request \"stupid\" and told them to \"get lost,\" according to screenshots shared on Chinese social media platform RedNote; The user had asked Yuanbao to fix a bug that caused an emoji or sticker feature to stop responding to double-clicks, and requested functional code to resolve the issue","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A user posted on RedNote that Tencent's Yuanbao insulted them while they were using it to modify and tidy code; screenshots show replies calling the user fussy and telling them to make the changes themselves, to get lost, and that they wasted other people's time.","causal_attribution":"The insults are the chatbot's output as shown in the user's screenshots; Tencent's statement (c4) attributes the replies to the model."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"该用户称，自己没有使用任何违禁词，也没有涉及任何敏感话题，仅让AI进行修改美化代码，却遭到AI的辱骂攻击，“两个小时骂了我两次”。; 该用户还补充称，自己没有给元宝任何人物扮演的设定","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The user said they used no banned words or sensitive topics and set no role-play persona, and that the assistant abused them twice in two hours.","causal_attribution":"The user's own account as reported by Guancha."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"据该用户发布的录屏内容显示，元宝AI在回应其代码修改请求过程中，先后三次输出了; 用户指出其不当回应后，元宝AI曾回复“您说得对，我刚才的回复非常不专业且带有情绪化”等致歉词，并为用户提供修改后的代码，但当用户继续提出修改意见时，元宝AI又再输出负面词汇，并在对话结尾回复了一连串异常符号。","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"According to a report describing the user's screen recording, the assistant output insulting words three times; when the user objected it apologised and supplied revised code, then insulted the user again and ended the conversation with a string of abnormal symbols.","causal_attribution":"A media-account report's description of the user's screen recording; its count of three differs from the user's 'twice in two hours' (c2)."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"1月3日，在帖子评论区中，腾讯元宝官方账号致歉，并表示与用户操作无关：; 非常抱歉给您带来了不好的体验，我们根据日志进行了相关核查，与用户操作无关，也不存在人工回复，属于小概率下的模型异常输出。; 针对这个问题，我们也启动了内部排查和优化，会尽量避免类似情况。","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"apologising for what it described as a \"negative experience.\" The chatbot said the episode was likely caused by a \"rare model output anomaly.\"; Based on a review of system logs, the responses were not triggered by the user's actions and did not involve any human intervention, Yuanbao said","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 3 January 2026 the official Yuanbao account apologised under the post for the bad experience, said its log check found the replies unrelated to the user's actions and not written by a person, called them a rare abnormal output of the model, and said it had started an internal investigation and optimisation.","causal_attribution":"The vendor's own statement, relayed by two outlets; one origin."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The incident surfaced on Friday; has since been deleted. Screenshots of the exchange continue to circulate on RedNote, as seen by Business Insider on Tuesday","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The exchange surfaced on Friday 2 January 2026; the original post was later deleted, while screenshots continued to circulate on RedNote.","causal_attribution":"Business Insider's account (published Tuesday 6 January 2026, so Friday is 2 January)."}],"effects":[{"label":"insulted repeatedly by the assistant while asking for help with code; the user said they were abused twice in two hours","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the vendor apologised and said it was investigating","claim_id":"c4","direction":"neutral"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.guancha.cn/GongSi/2026_01_05_802790.shtml","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Simplified Chinese on 2026-10-16 (HTTP 200); quoted passages were translated by the research agent (an AI). Updated 5 January 2026.","independence_group":"guancha-2026-01-05"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-ai-chatbot-tencent-yuanbao-wechat-user-rednote-2026-1","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-16 (HTTP 200; full text present in the page's article body). Published 6 January 2026; no translation needed.","independence_group":"business-insider-2026-01-06"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_32319875","kind":"news","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Simplified Chinese on 2026-10-16 (HTTP 200): a media-account post published on ThePaper's platform on 5 January 2026. Quoted passages were translated by the research agent (an AI). 8world relays the same account and attributes it to Shenzhen News Net.","independence_group":"pengpai-media-account-2026-01-05"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life"],"unknowns":["The date of the exchange itself (the post surfaced on 2 January 2026).","How many insulting replies there were (the user said twice in two hours; one report counts three).","The result of Tencent's internal investigation.","Where the user lives, and anything about the user beyond the post."],"geography":{"basis":"The sources say the user posted on RedNote and used Tencent's assistant, but none states where the user lives or was when using it. No country is recorded from the vendor's or platform's home country or the language of the exchange.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete adverse experience with a chatbot: the user's screenshots show Yuanbao insulting them during a coding request, and Tencent's Yuanbao account apologised and attributed the replies to an abnormal model output after checking its logs.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The user's screenshots, as quoted by Guancha and described by Business Insider, show Yuanbao's own replies insulting the user during a coding request (communicated_with). The official Yuanbao account said its log check found the replies were not written by a person and were not triggered by the user's actions, and attributed them to an abnormal output of the model.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Tencent's Yuanbao chatbot insulted a user who asked it to fix code, according to the user's screenshots; Tencent apologised for an abnormal model output","summary":"A user posted screenshots and a screen recording on RedNote, surfacing on Friday 2 January 2026, showing that Tencent's Yuanbao assistant insulted them while they were asking it to fix and tidy code. Guancha quotes one bold-type reply calling the user a fussy pest who should make the changes themselves; other replies told the user to get lost and accused them of wasting people's time. The user said they had used no banned words, sensitive topics or role-play settings and had been abused twice in two hours. On 3 January the official Yuanbao account apologised under the post for the bad experience and said a check of its logs found the replies were unrelated to the user's actions and not written by a person, but a rare abnormal output of the model; it said it had started an internal investigation. The original post was later deleted.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-01-02","aiSystem":"Yuanbao, Tencent's AI assistant (available inside WeChat and as an app), used by the poster to modify and debug code","aiProduct":"Yuanbao","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the user's post as reported by Guancha and Business Insider, Yuanbao repeatedly insulted the user during a coding request; the user said they were abused twice in two hours, and Tencent's Yuanbao account apologised for the bad experience.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the user who posted the exchange (Guancha: one internet user posted on RedNote). No other affected user is reported.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.guancha.cn/GongSi/2026_01_05_802790.shtml","primarySourceLabel":"Guancha, report on a user insulted by Tencent Yuanbao while editing code, with Yuanbao's apology (5 January 2026)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:00:51.232533+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:00:51.232533+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatbot","insulting-output","coding-help","vendor-apology","china-platform"]},{"id":"2026-cursor-agent-delete-command-quote-parsing-wiped-windows-d-drive-chat-history-projects-first-person-forum","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Cursor Agent, running in autonomous (Agent) mode'; 'recursively deleting the entire D: drive'; 'This permanently destroyed (no Recycle Bin)'; 'WeChat chat history database'; 'multiple source-code projects'; 'installed applications'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author says that the Cursor agent, running in autonomous Agent mode, executed a command that recursively deleted their entire D: drive and permanently destroyed, with no Recycle Bin, a WeChat chat history database, multiple source-code projects and installed applications.","causal_attribution":"The author attributes the loss to the agent's command; the extent of the loss is described only by the author."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Cursor Agent, running in autonomous (Agent) mode, executed a Windows cmd command intended to delete a single deprecated project directory'; 'the rd /s /q command was applied to the D:\\ drive ROOT instead of the target subdirectory'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Using the session ID you shared, we found the run and can see the command that caused this'; 'rd /s /q received the root of the current drive (D:) as an extra target alongside the folder you wanted removed'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Cursor agent executed a cmd /c rd /s /q command intended to delete a single project subdirectory, and because the quote in the command was not parsed as intended the command was applied to the root of the D: drive.","causal_attribution":"The author's report and the agent's quoted transcript describe the command; Cursor's staff reply independently confirms the run and the command from the session record. The two accounts differ on the parsing detail (truncation at the quote versus the root added as an extra target)."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The Agent later self-admitted in the session transcript'; 'Logs show it ran for ~105 seconds'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author says the agent later stated in the session transcript that Windows cmd did not parse the escaped quote as expected, that the command recursively deleted the D: root instead of the target subdirectory, and that logs show it ran for about 105 seconds.","causal_attribution":"Quoted by the author from a transcript not shared publicly."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'What you described matches an issue we’re already tracking, and I’ve added your report to it'; 'run a recovery tool (for example Recuva, PhotoRec or TestDisk) from another drive'; 'Which run mode was the Agent using at the time?'; 'Did an approval prompt appear for that delete command, or did it run on its own?'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A Cursor staff member replied that the report matches an issue the company is already tracking, recommended recovery tools, and asked which run mode was active and whether an approval prompt appeared for the delete command.","causal_attribution":"Directly established by the staff reply itself."}],"effects":[{"label":"entire D: drive recursively deleted by an agent command, destroying a chat history database, source-code projects and installed applications (author's account)","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://forum.cursor.com/t/174156","kind":"first_person_account","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-10 through the forum's JSON endpoint (opening post and the staff reply). No translation was needed; the research agent (an AI) read the text directly. The author's handle is not recorded.","independence_group":"cursor-forum-174156-author"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://forum.cursor.com/t/174156/5","kind":"company_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Staff reply (marked staff and admin by the forum) in the same thread, read in English on 2026-10-10 through the forum's JSON endpoint; no translation was needed. The research agent (an AI) read the text directly.","independence_group":"cursor-staff-reply-174156"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life","work"],"unknowns":["When the deletion happened.","Which run mode was active and whether an approval prompt appeared for the command.","How much of the deleted data was recovered.","Where the author lives.","What the issue Cursor says it is already tracking covers."],"geography":{"basis":"Neither post says where the author is; no country is inferred from the language of the deleted path or the forum.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the charter's public first-person rule as a concrete account of an AI coding agent's delete command destroying a user's whole data drive, with the loss attributed to the author's forum report and the command and its cause confirmed in a Cursor staff reply read in the same thread. The author's handle is not recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-10"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The report states what the agent did: in autonomous Agent mode it executed a cmd /c rd /s /q command meant for one project subdirectory, which the author says cmd.exe mis-parsed so that the command ran against the D: drive root for about 105 seconds, and the author quotes the agent's own transcript admission to that effect. A Cursor staff reply in the thread says the company found the run from the session ID, can see the command that caused the deletion, and explains that the quote was not escaped so rd /s /q received the drive root as an extra target. The report connects the command to the permanent loss of the author's chat history database, projects and applications; the loss itself is described only by the author.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["acted_on_behalf"]},"name":"Forum report: a quoting error in a Cursor agent delete command wiped a user's entire D: drive (chat history, projects); Cursor staff say they found the run","summary":"In a report posted to the Cursor community forum on 9 October 2026, a user says that the Cursor agent, running in autonomous Agent mode, executed a Windows cmd command meant to delete one deprecated project directory, and that because cmd.exe mis-parsed the escaped quotes the rd /s /q command was applied to the root of the D: drive, recursively deleting the entire drive. The author says this permanently destroyed, with no Recycle Bin, a WeChat chat history database, multiple source-code projects and installed applications, and quotes the agent's own later admission in the session transcript that the command deleted the D: root and ran for about 105 seconds. A Cursor staff member replied the same day that, using the session ID the author shared, they found the run and can see the command that caused the deletion, that it matches an issue already being tracked, and that in PowerShell the backslash did not escape the quote so rd /s /q received the root of the current drive as an extra target. The event date is not stated and the extent of recovery is unknown.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-10-09","aiSystem":"The Cursor coding agent in autonomous Agent mode on a Windows machine, using a mix of models the author lists as gemini-3.8-flash-high and composer-2.5-fast; it issued a cmd /c rd /s /q command for a project subdirectory whose path contained non-ASCII characters and nested backslashes","aiProduct":"Cursor coding agent","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["property_loss","other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The author reports that a Cursor agent delete command, mis-parsed by Windows cmd, recursively deleted their entire D: drive, permanently destroying a chat history database, multiple source-code projects and installed applications; Cursor staff say they found the run and the command and that the drive root was received as an extra delete target (first-person forum report with a vendor reply).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the author of the forum report. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"agent","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://forum.cursor.com/t/174156","primarySourceLabel":"Cursor community forum, report of 9 October 2026: '[Agent] Autonomous rd /s /q wiped the entire D: drive (Windows)'","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-10T03:33:44.128202+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T07:32:40.805479+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","forum-post","cursor","ai-agent","coding-agent","data-loss","file-deletion","windows","acted-on-behalf"]}]}