{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-26T07:46:42.057Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"visa","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"2026","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":3,"coverage":{"cases":3,"countries":2,"languages":3,"unknownLocation":1,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":2,"contextualRelations":1,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-russian-family-turned-away-at-istanbul-check-in-for-north-macedonia-after-chatgpt-said-no-visa-was-needed","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'В своем видео мужчина показал скриншот ответа ChatGPT, где нейросеть уверенно пишет: нет.'; 'ChatGPT нам говорит, что виза для россиян не требуется.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'ChatGPT нам говорит, что виза для россиян не требуется.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'ИИ сообщил, что граждане РФ могут находиться в Северной Македонии без визы до 90 дней.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'Искусственный интеллект ответил, что такой документ не потребуется.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The father says that before the trip he asked ChatGPT whether Russian citizens need a visa for North Macedonia and that it answered that they did not; in his video he showed a screenshot of the answer.","causal_attribution":"The father's own account, transcribed or relayed by every source; the conversation itself is known only from the screenshot shown in his video."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Туристы спокойно купили билеты, забронировали отель и машину и отправились в аэропорт в Стамбуле.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Выезжающие пытались показать на стойке скриншот с ChatGPT. В ответ им предъявили государственное постановление о том, что для россиян обязательна виза, которая оформляется за пять дней.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'На основании этого ответа семья купила билеты, забронировала отели и трансфер'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"According to the father, the family bought tickets and booked accommodation and a car on that answer, and at check-in at an Istanbul airport staff asked for visas and showed a government decision that Russians need a visa.","causal_attribution":"The father's account of what followed from the answer."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'вместе с женой и тремя дочками'; 'По словам мужчины, он потратил на билеты в общей сложности 50 тыс. руб.'; 'В итоге семья отправилась в Боснию и Герцеговину, где виза не требуется.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'пограничники потребовали у всех членов семьи визы'; 'Потеря на билетах составила 50 тысяч рублей'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"According to SHOT's account as relayed, the father was travelling with his wife and three daughters, all of whom were asked for visas, he lost about 50,000 roubles on the tickets, and the family flew to Bosnia and Herzegovina instead.","causal_attribution":"SHOT's account, from the same father, relayed by two outlets."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Северная Македония долгое время действительно пускала россиян без виз, но отменила эту практику еще в 2022-м.'; 'путешественников развернули на регистрации в аэропорту Турции и деньги за билеты, понятное дело, сгорели'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"Profile.ru wrote that North Macedonia ended visa-free entry for Russians in 2022, and that the travellers were turned away at check-in at an airport in Turkey and lost the money paid for the tickets.","causal_attribution":"Profile.ru's own statement of the rule and its retelling of the father's complaint."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'ChatGPT ответил, что россиянам для поездки в Северную Македонию виза нужна, безвизовый режим был отменен в марте 2022 года.'; 'Не исключено, что турист, он же блогер, сочинил эту яркую историю ради просмотров.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Business FM put the father's question to ChatGPT itself and was told that Russians need a visa for North Macedonia because visa-free entry ended in March 2022, and wrote that it could not rule out that the tourist, a blogger, invented the story for views.","causal_attribution":"Business FM's own test and doubt; a later test does not show what ChatGPT answered the father."}],"effects":[{"label":"family refused at check-in for its flight to North Macedonia and changed its trip (father's account)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"about 50,000 roubles lost on tickets (father's account via SHOT)","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.bfm.ru/news/609327","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ru","translation_note":"Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-26 (HTTP 200); quotations were translated by the research agent, and no human translator or reviewer was involved. Business FM transcribes the father's video, describes the screenshot he showed, and reports its own test of ChatGPT.","independence_group":"father-video-and-shot-relays-jun-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://tengrinews.kz/around-the-world/chatgpt-sorval-seme-otdyih-v-makedonii-601517/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ru","translation_note":"Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-26 (HTTP 200); quotations were translated by the research agent, and no human translator or reviewer was involved. Tengrinews quotes the father's Instagram video.","independence_group":"father-video-and-shot-relays-jun-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://mel.fm/novosti/4639705-semya-iz-rossii-ne-smogla-uletet-v-otpusk-iz-zaoshibki-v-otvete-neyroseti","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ru","translation_note":"Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-26 (HTTP 200); quotations were translated by the research agent, and no human translator or reviewer was involved. Mel summarises the father's Instagram video and the ChatGPT answer shown in it.","independence_group":"father-video-and-shot-relays-jun-2026"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://news.ru/society/semya-iz-rossii-poteryala-dengi-iz-za-oshibki-nejroseti","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ru","translation_note":"Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-26 (HTTP 200); quotations were translated by the research agent, and no human translator or reviewer was involved. NEWS.ru relays the Telegram channel SHOT, whose account comes from the same father.","independence_group":"father-video-and-shot-relays-jun-2026"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://life.ru/p/1887427","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ru","translation_note":"Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-26 (HTTP 200); quotations were translated by the research agent, and no human translator or reviewer was involved. Life.ru relays the Telegram channel SHOT, whose account comes from the same father.","independence_group":"father-video-and-shot-relays-jun-2026"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://profile.ru/lifestyle/travels/ii-otpusk-otmenyaetsya-stoit-li-doveryat-nejroseti-organizaciju-otdyha-1914332/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ru","translation_note":"Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-26 (HTTP 200); quotations were translated by the research agent, and no human translator or reviewer was involved. Profile.ru recounts the case from the father's social-media complaint and states when North Macedonia ended visa-free entry for Russians.","independence_group":"father-video-and-shot-relays-jun-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life"],"unknowns":["The exact date of the refusal (the reports appeared on 14 June 2026 and the father said he bought the tickets the day before).","The full ChatGPT conversation and the model or version used.","Whether any of the ticket money was refunded.","Whether the account is accurate: Business FM raised the possibility that it was invented for views, and no independent confirmation was found."],"geography":{"basis":"Business FM, Tengrinews and Mel place the refusal at an airport in Istanbul, and Profile.ru at an airport in Turkey. The family's country of residence is not recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["TR"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete first-person account reported by several outlets: a father says ChatGPT told him Russians need no visa for North Macedonia, and that the family was refused at check-in and lost the ticket money. All sources relay his one account; Business FM's doubt and its own correct test answer are recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-26"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The father says ChatGPT answered his question whether Russians need a visa for North Macedonia by saying they did not, and showed a screenshot of that answer in his video; the family bought tickets and bookings on that answer and was refused at check-in because a visa is required. The conversation is known only from his video; Business FM's own later test of ChatGPT gave the correct answer.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Russian family turned away at Istanbul check-in for North Macedonia after ChatGPT told the father no visa was needed, he says in a video","summary":"In a video posted on Instagram and reported by Russian and Kazakh outlets on 14 June 2026, a Russian father said he had asked ChatGPT whether Russian citizens need a visa for North Macedonia and that it answered that they did not; he showed a screenshot of the answer. According to the reports, the family bought tickets and booked hotels and a car, and at check-in at an Istanbul airport staff asked for visas and showed them a government decision that Russians need one. The Telegram channel SHOT, as relayed by NEWS.ru and Life, reported that he was travelling with his wife and three daughters, that he lost about 50,000 roubles on the tickets, and that the family flew to Bosnia and Herzegovina instead. Business FM put the question to ChatGPT itself and was told that a visa is needed; it wrote that it could not rule out that the tourist, a blogger, had invented the story for views. Profile.ru recounted the case in October 2026 and wrote that North Macedonia ended visa-free entry for Russians in 2022. The account rests on the father's video and has not been independently confirmed.","incidentDate":"2026-06-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-06-14","aiSystem":"ChatGPT, which the father says answered his question about visa requirements for North Macedonia by saying Russian citizens need no visa","aiProduct":"ChatGPT (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss","other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the father's video and SHOT's account as relayed, the family was refused at check-in for its flight to North Macedonia because it had no visas, he lost about 50,000 roubles on tickets, and the family changed its trip to Bosnia and Herzegovina.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":4,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The father, who asked ChatGPT, and his wife and three daughters, who were refused with him at check-in according to SHOT's account relayed by NEWS.ru and Life; each counted once. Viewers of the video are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.bfm.ru/news/609327","primarySourceLabel":"Business FM, 14 Jun 2026: Tourists believed ChatGPT and set off for North Macedonia without visas","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-26T03:10:58.917445+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-26T03:10:58.917445+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","travel","visa","wrong-answer","denied-boarding"]},{"id":"2026-sweden-fact-checkers-say-clickbait-network-spread-false-posts-with-ai-generated-images-claiming-mp-confessed-to-election-fraud","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Politikern Mohamed Abdukardir Ali påstås ha erkänt valfusk och gripits under dramatiska former, men påståendena som nu sprids på Facebook är falska'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Bilderna som fått dem att reagera handlar om V-ledamoten Mohamed Ali, och påstår att han nu erkänner valfusk och har gripits av polis. Men bakom dessa falska uppgifter ligger ingen svensk nyhetssajt'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Andra inlägg innehåller osanna uppgifter om att Ali gripits, erkänt brott eller hållit presskonferenser.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Facebook posts falsely claimed that the MP had confessed to election fraud and had been arrested by police.","causal_attribution":"Two separate reviews (Källkritikbyrån and SVT Verifierar) describe the posts and call them false; Omni relays the first."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Mellan den 10:e och 15:e oktober har sidan publicerat tolv inlägg med Mohamed Ali i fokus, som tillsammans genererat omkring fyratusen reaktioner.'; 'I den artikeln påstås att polisen utfört en husrannsakan mot en lokal kopplad till Ali och i ett kassaskåp hittat'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Between 10 and 15 October 2026 the page Dagens Fina Stund published twelve posts focused on the MP that drew about four thousand reactions, and linked articles claimed police had found foreign currency and false identity documents in a search of premises connected to him.","causal_attribution":"Källkritikbyrån's own count and description."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'påståendena som nu sprids på Facebook är falska och bilderna AI-genererade'; 'använder sedan AI-verktyg för att generera fejkinnehåll som spinner vidare på dessa'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Källkritikbyrån states that the images in the posts were AI-generated.","causal_attribution":"The fact-checker does not describe its method for identifying the images as AI-generated."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'publicerad av den vietnamesiska klickbetesfabriken BeeUp'; 'Gemensamt för dessa sajter har varit ett återkommande adminkonto vid namn Hupchao, som vi kunnat knyta till BeeUp:s vd'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Utåt sett presenterar sig bolaget som en viral marknadsföringsbyrå, men i själva verket pumpar det ut AI-genererat innehåll i stor skala, säger Jonathan Lundberg, journalist vid Källkritikbyrån.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Källkritikbyrån links the page through a recurring administrator account to BeeUp, a Vietnamese company that presents itself as a viral marketing agency and, according to the fact-checker, produces AI-generated fake content at scale.","causal_attribution":"One origin: Källkritikbyrån's review, relayed in SVT as a quotation."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'”Utvisa honom!”, ryter kommentar efter kommentar på Facebook. Bilderna som fått dem att reagera handlar om V-ledamoten Mohamed Ali'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Facebook commenters reacted to the images about the MP with demands such as 'Utvisa honom!' (deport him).","causal_attribution":"SVT's observation of the comments; their number is not stated."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Därefter följde uppgifter om misstänkt valfusk i samband med hans personvalskampanj.'; 'Mohamed Ali dementerar detta'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The posts followed reports of suspected election fraud connected with the MP's personal-vote campaign, which he denies.","causal_attribution":"Context reported by SVT; it bears on why the fabricated stories drew attention, not on the AI images."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Drivkrafterna verkar vara ekonomiska snarare än någon vilja att påverka det svenska politiska landskapet.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"SVT says the drivers behind the page appear to be economic rather than an attempt to influence Swedish politics.","causal_attribution":"SVT's assessment of motive."}],"effects":[{"label":"falsely depicted as arrested and confessing to election fraud, drawing hostile comments","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://kallkritikbyran.se/klicksajt-sprider-falska-pastaenden-om-mohamed-abdukardir-ali-v/","kind":"fact_check","access":"read","language":"sv","translation_note":"Read in Swedish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Källkritikbyrån review published 16 October 2026, HTTP 200, full article read.","independence_group":"kallkritikbyran-review-oct-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/fejkade-nyheter-om-v-ledamoten-mohamed-ali-sprids","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"sv","translation_note":"Read in Swedish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. SVT Verifierar article published 17 October 2026, HTTP 200; the article text was read, the accompanying video was not viewed. Its AI wording is a quotation of a Källkritikbyrån journalist.","independence_group":"svt-verifierar-review-oct-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://omni.se/sajt-i-vietnam-sprider-falska-pastaenden-om-mohamed-ali/a/aOLpWa","kind":"news_relay","access":"read","language":"sv","translation_note":"Read in Swedish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-18 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Omni summary published 16 October 2026 of Källkritikbyrån's review, HTTP 200; it derives from the fact-checker and is not independent of it.","independence_group":"kallkritikbyran-review-oct-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["public_life","elections"],"unknowns":["Which tool produced the images and how Källkritikbyrån identified them as AI-generated.","The MP's own response to the fabricated posts and whether he or his party reported them to Facebook or police.","How many people saw or believed the posts; reactions and followers do not establish this.","Whether Facebook removed the page or posts."],"geography":{"basis":"The depicted MP is a member of the Swedish Riksdag from Borlänge (Källkritikbyrån, SVT). The fabricated posts were published on Facebook, and Källkritikbyrån attributes the page to a company in Vietnam; no source states where the posts were made or read, so no event country is inferred from the posts' language or intended audience.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["SE"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published on Källkritikbyrån's review, which states that the images in posts falsely claiming the MP confessed to election fraud and was arrested were AI-generated, and on SVT Verifierar's separate review of the same posts, which reports Facebook commenters reacting to the images with calls for his deportation. The AI attribution is the fact-checker's, with its technical basis undisclosed.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-18"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Källkritikbyrån, which reviewed the posts, states that the claims are false and the images AI-generated, and that the network behind the page uses AI tools to generate fake content; SVT quotes a Källkritikbyrån journalist on the firm's AI-generated content. The fact-checker does not describe how it identified the images as AI-generated or name a tool, so the technical basis of the attribution is undisclosed. The generated images depicting the MP are part of the fabricated posts that drew the hostile reactions SVT reports.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Swedish fact-checkers say a clickbait network spread false posts with AI-generated images claiming MP Mohamed Ali confessed to election fraud and was arrested","summary":"Between 10 and 15 October 2026 a Swedish-language Facebook page published twelve posts about Mohamed Abdukardir Ali, a Left Party (V) member of the Riksdag, including claims that he had confessed to election fraud and that police had detained him in the middle of a press conference. The fact-checking site Källkritikbyrån reported on 16 October that the claims are false and the images AI-generated, and linked the page through a shared administrator account to BeeUp, a Vietnamese firm that presents itself as a viral marketing agency. SVT Verifierar reported on 17 October that the images claim he confesses to election fraud and has been arrested, and that comment after comment on Facebook reacted with demands such as 'Utvisa honom!' (deport him). The posts built on real reports of suspected election irregularities connected with his personal-vote campaign in Borlänge, which he denies. No source names the image tool, describes how the images were identified as AI-generated, or reports his response to the fabricated posts.","incidentDate":"2026-10-10","incidentEndDate":"2026-10-15","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-16","aiSystem":"Unidentified AI image generation used to produce images in fabricated Facebook posts and articles about the MP, according to Källkritikbyrån","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Fabricated Facebook posts with images that fact-checkers say were AI-generated falsely presented the MP as having confessed to election fraud and been arrested; SVT reports Facebook commenters reacting with demands for his deportation.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the depicted MP, falsely presented as arrested and confessing (Källkritikbyrån, SVT), with hostile comments reported in reaction (SVT). The page's followers, reactions and readers are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"SE","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://kallkritikbyran.se/klicksajt-sprider-falska-pastaenden-om-mohamed-abdukardir-ali-v/","primarySourceLabel":"Källkritikbyrån, 16 October 2026: clickbait site spreads false claims about Mohamed Abdukardir Ali (V)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-18T03:08:02.727327+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-18T03:08:02.727327+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-generated-images","disinformation","politics","sweden","facebook","clickbait-network","depicted-or-impersonated","fact-check"]},{"id":"2026-us-meta-26-employees-sue-alleging-ai-assisted-may-layoff-selection-penalized-protected-leave","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"OAKLAND DIVISION","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Filed 07/13/26","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Plaintiffs initiated this lawsuit on July 13, 2026, bringing claims against Meta","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"A group of 26 Meta employees has sued the company, claiming it used artificial intelligence systems to select people for layoffs, disproportionately targeting those on medical, parental or family leave.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"On 13 July 2026 twenty-six anonymous plaintiffs (Does 1 through 26) filed a complaint against Meta Platforms, Inc. in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland division, alleging employment discrimination in the May 2026 reduction in force.","causal_attribution":"The filing of the complaint is documented by the court record. The complaint establishes only the plaintiffs’ allegations."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"activity-monitoring data, AI-token-usage dashboards, and algorithmically assisted","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"artificial-intelligence-assisted systems to score, rank, and select employees for inclusion","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"algorithmic productivity scoring drawn from keystroke, screen-content, mouse,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The parties dispute whether Meta utilized AI in deciding to terminate plaintiffs’","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"They claim that Meta used a number of internal AI-assisted systems to score and rank employees on a termination list.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that Meta used a set of internal AI-assisted systems to score, rank and select employees for the termination list: the Metamate internal large-language-model assistant, employee-trained \"second brain\" agents, keystroke and other activity-monitoring data, AI-token-usage dashboards, and algorithmically assisted performance ranking and calibration.","causal_attribution":"These are the plaintiffs’ allegations, pleaded on information and belief and supported by plaintiff declarations that were not inspected (they are quoted in the complaint and the order). Meta disputes them (claim c4). The news reports and the court order restate the complaint and are one reporting chain with it."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"be accumulated by an employee who is on protected medical or family leave, or whose","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"protected-leave-takers or accommodation-seekers for individualized human review. Meta","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"On information and belief, Meta did not neutralize any of the foregoing inputs for","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"result was that employees who took protected leaves were disproportionately selected for","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Plaintiffs are twenty-six current and former Meta employees, each of whom Meta","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"selected for separation in the RIF, and each of whom","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"About half the plaintiffs had taken leave for caregiving or pregnancy-related reasons.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that the inputs to these systems cannot be accumulated by an employee on protected medical, family or parental leave, that Meta did not neutralise them for protected leave, and that employees who took protected leave were therefore disproportionately selected for layoff. It states that each plaintiff was selected for separation in the reduction in force and had, within the 24 months before it, taken, requested or been approved for protected leave, or requested or received a disability accommodation.","causal_attribution":"Allegation of the plaintiffs. The court found on 17 July 2026 only serious questions going to the merits and no likelihood of success on that record (claim c5). Whether any AI system affected any plaintiff’s selection is unresolved."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"selection decisions in the RIF were “made by human","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"promotion history over a defined period. There was no AI-","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"was selected based on leave status, disability, or any other protected characteristic,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"“selection decision [was] made by ‘AI.’” Id. ¶ 11.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Selection decisions were made by human business leaders","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"},{"locator":"defined period. There was no AI-assisted “scoring” or “ranking” related to employee","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"},{"locator":"guidance does not permit AI adoption and usage metrics to be used as negative factors in","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"performance reviews in 2025 or as selection criteria in the RIF.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Meta denies the allegations. A Meta spokesperson said workforce management and organisational decisions were made by people, not AI. In declarations filed by a Meta human-resources director, Meta states that selection decisions were made by human business leaders using documented neutral criteria, that no AI-assisted scoring or ranking of employee performance was used, that no plaintiff was selected on the basis of leave status or disability, and that no selection decision was made by AI.","causal_attribution":"Meta’s statements and declarations about its own process. They are a party account and had been tested only through briefing and court hearings (claims c5 and c7), not in discovery."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"described below, the TRO is DENIED.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"The parties dispute whether Meta utilized AI in deciding to terminate plaintiffs’","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"plaintiffs have not shown a likelihood of success on the merits, but rather a “serious question[]”","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Loss of health care, employment, protected leave, and unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Loss of immigration status is different. Four of the plaintiffs have employment-based,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"they were not in the rooms where it happened.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 17 July 2026 the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order. The order records that the parties dispute whether Meta used AI in deciding to terminate the plaintiffs, finds serious questions going to the merits but no shown likelihood of success on that record, finds that loss of health care, employment, protected leave and unvested equity can be remedied in arbitration, and treats the possible loss of immigration status for four plaintiffs with Meta-sponsored visas as a potentially irreparable harm that needed more information.","causal_attribution":"A court order establishes what the court ruled and recorded. It does not establish that AI was or was not used in the selection."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"On May 20, 2026, Meta began notifying the selected employees by email, beginning with","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"finalized on or about July 22, 2026 (and on or about August 20, 2026 for New York","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"laid off on May 20, 2026.” Complaint (“Compl.”) [Dkt. No. 1] ¶ 45 (the “mass reduction in force”","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Though they have been notified of their layoffs, all 26 remain employed by Meta, with separations set to begin July 22.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"Meta in May notified nearly 8,000 employees, or about 10% of its global workforce, that they were losing their jobs","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"Laid-off workers remain on the payroll but lost access to Meta systems on May 20","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"Meta began notifying employees selected in the reduction in force on 20 May 2026 (about 8,000 employees, roughly 10 percent of its workforce). The complaint says the plaintiffs were notified of their selection from that date, and that separations were scheduled for about 22 July 2026 (later for some plaintiffs). Meta said in court filings that laid-off workers stayed on the payroll but lost access to Meta systems on 20 May.","causal_attribution":"The notification date and the scheduled separation dates come from the complaint and Meta court filings as relayed by Reuters. The sources inspected do not report whether each separation took place on its scheduled date, although Courthouse News called the plaintiffs former employees on 24 August 2026."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction conducted via videoconference. The Court","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"summarizes tentative. Argument of counsel heard. Motion taken under submission; written order","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"I have a record I have to deal with and the record at the moment does not persuade me of the merits","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"categorical denial of any impact of AI in the termination process","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"whether what plaintiffs think happened, happened","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"}],"assertion":"The court held a hearing on the plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction motion on 24 August 2026, heard argument and took the motion under submission with a written order to follow. Courthouse News reports that the judge said the record at that time did not persuade the judge of the merits, that the plaintiffs’ evidence raised some potential questions about Meta’s categorical denial of any impact of AI in the termination process, and that the case turns on whether what plaintiffs think happened, happened.","causal_attribution":"The minute entry documents that the hearing occurred and the motion was taken under submission. The judge’s remarks are reported by one news outlet and the transcript was not inspected. No written ruling on the preliminary injunction was found as of 29 September 2026."},{"id":"c8","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"and only Plaintiff Doe 20, hereby voluntarily dismisses","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"},{"locator":"remain parties and continue to prosecute this action","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"},{"locator":"Doe 20 was voluntarily dismissed from this action on August 3, 2026 pursuant to Federal","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"is made on behalf of Doe 20, and no relief is sought on Doe 20’s behalf.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"One plaintiff (Doe 20) voluntarily dismissed all of that plaintiff’s claims without prejudice on 3 August 2026 (Dkt. 33), and the notice states that Does 1 through 19 and 21 through 26 remain parties. No reason is given in the notice.","causal_attribution":"A filing by the plaintiffs’ counsel records the dismissal. It does not say whether that plaintiff was selected in the reduction in force or why the dismissal was made."},{"id":"c9","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"They recognize that their claims must be arbitrated, and they have initiated arbitration proceedings","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"with the American Arbitration Association (AAA). Here, they seek a temporary restraining order:","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"while they pursue their claims in private arbitration","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"from this Court only the status-quo-preserving provisional relief that Meta’s own","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"G. Reserve to the arbitral forum all relief on the merits, including but not limited to","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The 17 July 2026 order records that the plaintiffs recognize their claims must be arbitrated and that they have initiated arbitration proceedings with the American Arbitration Association. The complaint says the plaintiffs seek from the court only status-quo-preserving provisional relief pending an independent audit of the selection process and arbitration of the merits, and it reserves merits relief such as reinstatement, back pay and damages to the arbitral forum.","causal_attribution":"The order records the plaintiffs’ own statement about their arbitration filings. The arbitration itself is confidential and its progress is unknown."}],"effects":[{"label":"Employees on or after protected leave allegedly disproportionately selected for layoff by an AI-assisted process that did not account for leave (disputed by Meta)","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"Plaintiffs notified of selection for termination on 20 May 2026, with separations scheduled from 22 July 2026 and possible loss of health coverage, unvested equity and (for four plaintiffs) work-visa status","claim_id":"c6","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"meta-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.25.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.42.1_1.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"meta-court-declarations"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.46.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.49.0.pdf","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/26-meta-workers-sue-ai-aided-layoffs-medical-family-leave/","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"meta-complaint"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2026/jul/17/us-judge-wont-block-meta-from-laying-off-workers-w/","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"reuters-tro-coverage"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://www.courthousenews.com/meta-workers-claiming-ai-fired-them-unlikely-to-see-relief/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"courthouse-news-hearing"},{"id":"s9","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.31.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"meta-court-declarations"},{"id":"s10","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.33.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","health"],"unknowns":["Whether any AI system scored, ranked or selected any plaintiff is unresolved. The complaint pleads it on information and belief. Meta denies it in declarations. No discovery had occurred in the sources inspected, and the judge said on 17 July 2026 that plaintiffs were not in the rooms where the selections happened.","The sources inspected do not show how many people beyond the plaintiffs were selected because of leave, or how many of the roughly 8,000 laid-off employees were scored by any AI-assisted system. Only the plaintiffs are counted as reported harmed.","The order on the preliminary injunction motion (argued 24 August 2026, taken under submission) had not been found by 29 September 2026. The hearing remarks were read only through one news report and the transcript was not inspected.","Whether each plaintiff’s separation took place on its scheduled date (22 July 2026 for most, later for some) is not stated in the sources inspected. Reuters and CBS/AP describe the plaintiffs as still employed in July, and Courthouse News called them former employees on 24 August 2026.","One plaintiff (Doe 20) was voluntarily dismissed on 3 August 2026 and no reason is stated. The affected count therefore uses 25.","The complaint and declarations contain individual medical, pregnancy and immigration details. They are anonymised in the public copies and are deliberately not described here.","Reuters and WSJ pages for the initial filing could not be read (HTTP 401). Reuters coverage of the 17 July ruling was read through a Spokesman-Review copy. The Law.com article was behind a subscription wall and was not cited.","The complaint alleges that data captured by a separate Meta employee-monitoring program (the Model Capability Initiative) supplied inputs to the selection process, and Meta denies that AI was used in the selection. That program’s own privacy and security consequences are a different event, recorded as 2026-meta-mci-us-employee-keystroke-and-screen-capture-for-ai-training-then-internal-data-exposure, and are not part of this record."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint states that the plaintiffs worked in California, Illinois, Washington, New York, the District of Columbia, Pennsylvania and Florida and the suit is in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. Meta also notified employees in other countries in the same reduction in force, but no plaintiff outside the US is described.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"The complaint, the court order denying the temporary restraining order, two Meta declarations, the plaintiffs’ notice of dismissal of one plaintiff and the hearing minute entry were read from the court record (CourtListener copies), with CBS/AP, Reuters and Courthouse News reports. Every AI-related statement is attributed. The plaintiffs are anonymous in the record and are not described individually. Meta denies that AI made or informed any selection decision and the court has not resolved the dispute.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that Meta used internal AI-assisted systems (Metamate, second-brain agents, activity-monitoring scoring, AI-token-usage dashboards, algorithmic ranking and calibration) to score, rank and select employees for the 20 May 2026 termination list. Meta’s declarations say selection decisions were made by human business leaders and that there was no AI-assisted scoring or ranking related to employee performance, and the court described the declarations as saying Meta did not use AI in any way with respect to the RIF. The court recorded that the parties dispute whether Meta used AI in deciding to terminate the plaintiffs and found on 17 July 2026 that the plaintiffs had not shown a likelihood of success on the current record. On 24 August 2026 the judge said the plaintiffs’ evidence raised some potential questions about Meta’s categorical denial. No discovery had tested Meta’s account in the sources inspected.","status":"disputed"},"person_relations":["made_decision_about","made_claim_about"]},"name":"US: 26 Meta employees sue alleging an AI-assisted May 2026 layoff selection penalized workers on protected leave, Meta says people made the decisions","summary":"On 20 May 2026 Meta began notifying about 8,000 employees (roughly 10 percent of its workforce) that they had been selected for layoff. On 13 July 2026 twenty-six anonymous employees who had taken or requested medical, pregnancy, parental or family leave, or a disability accommodation, sued Meta in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that Meta used internal AI-assisted systems (including the Metamate assistant, keystroke and activity monitoring, AI-token-usage dashboards and algorithmic performance ranking) to score, rank and select employees, and that these inputs could not accumulate during protected leave, so plaintiffs on leave were disproportionately selected. Meta says workforce decisions were made by people, not AI, and that no selection decision was made by AI. On 17 July 2026 the court denied a temporary restraining order, recording that the parties dispute whether Meta used AI in the terminations and finding serious questions on the merits but no shown likelihood of success. One plaintiff was voluntarily dismissed on 3 August 2026. The preliminary injunction motion was argued on 24 August 2026 and taken under submission. The plaintiffs are pursuing their merits claims in arbitration and the allegations are unproven.","incidentDate":"2026-05-20","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-07-14","aiSystem":"Meta internal AI-assisted systems alleged in the complaint: the Metamate internal LLM assistant, employee-trained \"second brain\" agents, keystroke and activity-monitoring productivity scoring, AI-token-usage dashboards and AI-assisted performance calibration (Meta denies AI was used in selecting employees for the layoff)","aiProduct":"Meta internal AI systems (reported)","aiCompany":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"disputed","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The complaint alleges that 26 employees were selected for termination in Meta’s May 2026 reduction in force through an AI-assisted process that penalised protected leave, with separations scheduled from 22 July 2026 and asserted losses of employer-subsidised health coverage, unvested equity and, for four plaintiffs, work-visa status. Meta denies that AI was used in the selections. The court found the alleged harms other than immigration status remediable in arbitration and has not decided the merits.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":25,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint states that each of 26 plaintiffs was selected for separation in the May 2026 reduction in force. One plaintiff was voluntarily dismissed on 3 August 2026 without a stated reason, so 25 active plaintiffs are counted as a documented minimum. The roughly 8,000 other employees notified in the reduction in force are not counted because no source ties their selection to the alleged AI process.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474171/gov.uscourts.cand.474171.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Complaint, Does 1 through 26 v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (N.D. Cal., filed 13 Jul 2026)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T21:16:06.345461+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:57.733761+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2026"]}]}