{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T07:27:12.903Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"us","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"2024","response":"lawsuit","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":15,"coverage":{"cases":15,"countries":2,"languages":3,"unknownLocation":4,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":15,"regulatory":0,"minors":5,"coreRelations":6,"contextualRelations":7,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":2,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":2},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2024-marana-arizona-gaggle-alert-on-pupils-unsent-draft-email-led-to-suspension-federal-court-lets-free-speech-claim-proceed","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Gaggle is a subscription, AI-based safety management software program that ... program that monitors students’ keystrokes on their laptops.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"in October 2024, her son was drafting an email to a teacher at her home about a grade when he started typing out jokes. ... The threat was flagged by a monitoring software used by the school districts on their ,called Gaggle.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"immediately deleted the message and closed his laptop, without","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the family's complaint, Gaggle, the AI-based safety management software the district ran on school laptops, monitors students' keystrokes, and it flagged a threat-like joke the pupil typed at home in October 2024 in a draft email to a teacher that he deleted without sending.","causal_attribution":"The family's allegation; the district declined to comment."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Within an hour of ... School Resource ... in class, and they were concerned about a possible threat. ... reported having received a Gaggle notification regarding ... The Gaggle notification included a photograph of ... were being tracked or that anyone could see the draft email.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The court's order recites the complaint's allegation that, within an hour, the principal and the school resource officer called the mother after the principal received a Gaggle notification that included a photograph of the pupil's screen showing the draft email, and that neither mother nor son knew his keystrokes were being tracked.","causal_attribution":"Allegations taken as true for the motion; not findings."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"would be suspended for ten days ‘for using a school device to write about ... suspended for forty-five days, to include the ten days currently being served, with the ... On December 5, 2024, ... suspension but modifying the length of ... suspension to nine days.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the allegations the order recites, the pupil was suspended for ten days for using a school device to write about shooting up the school; a long-term suspension hearing set a 45-day suspension, reducible to eleven days with counselling; appeals affirmed it, and on 5 December 2024 the superintendent affirmed the suspension but shortened it to nine days.","causal_attribution":"The family's account of the district's disciplinary decisions."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"the Court will deny Defendants’ motion to ... dismiss regarding Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claim. ... the Court will dismiss his procedural due process ... to state a procedural due process claim arising from his long-term suspension. ... Dismiss (Doc. 20) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In an order filed on 30 March 2026, the District of Arizona granted the district's motion to dismiss in part and denied it in part: it declined to dismiss the First Amendment claim and dismissed the procedural due process claims over the ten-day and long-term suspensions.","causal_attribution":"none"},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"I had no idea that, down to the keystroke which was on the computer for a few seconds and deleted, that that would be seen ... MUSD declined to comment on this story, citing the pending litigation","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The pupil's mother told KOLD she had not known that a few seconds of deleted keystrokes could be seen; the district declined to comment, citing the pending litigation.","causal_attribution":"none"}],"effects":[{"label":"pupil suspended after an AI monitoring alert on an unsent, deleted draft email (family's allegations)","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1450446/gov.uscourts.azd.1450446.33.0.pdf","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (CourtListener RECAP copy of ECF 33, HTTP 200, all 17 pages); no translation. Order of the US District Court for the District of Arizona filed 30 March 2026 on the defendants' motion to dismiss; its factual background takes the first amended complaint's allegations as true for that purpose.","independence_group":"d-ariz-4-25-cv-00377-order"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1450446/gov.uscourts.azd.1450446.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (CourtListener RECAP copy of ECF 1, the complaint filed 15 July 2025, HTTP 200); no translation. The first amended complaint (ECF 7) was not read; the order recites it.","independence_group":"family-complaint-d-ariz-2025"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.kold.com/2025/08/14/family-sues-marana-usd-after-student-was-suspended-school-shooting-joke/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (HTTP 200); no translation. KOLD 13 News report of 14 August 2025 interviewing the pupil's mother and the family's lawyer; the district declined to comment. Same family account as the complaint.","independence_group":"family-complaint-d-ariz-2025"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["education","privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["The district's account of the alert and its decisions.","What category or score, if any, Gaggle assigned to the text, and whether a human reviewer at Gaggle saw it before the school.","How the case will be decided."],"geography":{"basis":"The pupil attended a school of the Marana Unified School District in Arizona, which issued the laptop, ran the monitoring and imposed the suspension; the suit is in the District of Arizona.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a contextual case (made_claim_about, informed_decision_about): according to the family's complaint, AI-based monitoring software flagged a pupil's deleted, unsent draft and the alert led to his suspension, and a federal court order of March 2026 lets the family's First Amendment claim proceed. The facts are the family's allegations; the district has not commented. The pupil is not identified.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-23"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The family's complaint describes Gaggle as AI-based safety management software that monitors students' keystrokes, and alleges, as the court's order recites, that Gaggle sent the principal a notification with a photograph of the pupil's screen showing a deleted, unsent draft containing a threat-like joke. That automated flag of his text as concerning content is what brought the draft to the school's attention: the principal and school resource officer called within the hour, and the district suspended him for writing it. The district has not commented, and how the software classified the text is not described beyond the notification.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["made_claim_about","informed_decision_about"]},"name":"Arizona: family says a Gaggle alert on a pupil's unsent joke email led to his suspension; federal court lets their free-speech claim proceed","summary":"On 9 October 2024 a Marana Unified School District pupil in Arizona, typing at home on a school Chromebook in front of his mother, wrote a threat-like joke about shooting up the school in a draft email to a teacher and deleted it without sending it, according to his family's federal lawsuit. The family says Gaggle, the AI-based monitoring software the district used, flagged it: the principal received a Gaggle notification with a photograph of the screen and, with the school resource officer, called the mother within the hour. The family says the pupil was suspended for ten days, a long-term suspension hearing imposed 45 days reducible to eleven with counselling, and the superintendent finally affirmed a nine-day suspension in December 2024. In March 2026 the District of Arizona let the family's First Amendment claim proceed and dismissed its procedural due process claims. The district declined to comment to the press.","incidentDate":"2024-10-09","incidentEndDate":"2024-12-05","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2025-07-15","aiSystem":"Gaggle, described in the family's complaint as subscription, AI-based safety management software that monitors students' keystrokes on school laptops; its notification to the principal included a photograph of the pupil's screen","aiProduct":"Gaggle (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["educational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to his family's lawsuit, a Gaggle alert on a deleted, unsent joke in a draft email led a school district to suspend a pupil; the superintendent finally set nine days. A federal court let the family's free-speech claim proceed.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"outward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the pupil suspended after the Gaggle alert (complaint, order and KOLD). His parents are plaintiffs on his behalf and are not counted separately.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1450446/gov.uscourts.azd.1450446.33.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"US District Court, District of Arizona, No. 4:25-cv-00377, order on motion to dismiss filed 30 Mar 2026 (ECF 33)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-23T03:21:47.656673+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-23T03:21:47.656673+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["school","student-monitoring","gaggle","suspension","first-amendment","lawsuit"]},{"id":"2024-beijing-arbitration-rules-tech-firm-unlawfully-dismissed-map-data-collector-after-moving-work-to-ai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'12月26日，北京市人力资源和社会保障局召开北京市劳动人事争议仲裁委员会工作会议，会议审议发布了2025年度劳动人事争议仲裁十大典型案例。'; '其中，案例六界定了企业基于正常经营决策引入AI技术替代岗位'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'据《北京日报》报道，北京人社局于12月26日揭示了2025年度劳动人事争议仲裁的几个典型案例。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The Beijing human resources and social security bureau released ten typical labour arbitration cases of 2025 on 26 December 2025, including one on dismissal after AI replaced a post.","causal_attribution":"Directly reported by China National Radio's reporter at the bureau meeting."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'于2009年7月1日入职某科技公司，担任数据采集员，负责传统人工地图数据采集业务。'; '2024年初，该科技公司为应对市场变化与技术发展，决定进行业务转型，将传统人工采集业务全面转向由AI技术主导的自动化数据采集'; '2024年12月26日，公司以“劳动合同订立时所依据的客观情况发生重大变化，致使劳动合同无法继续履行，且双方未能就变更劳动合同内容达成一致”为由'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'2024年年初，公司转向AI自动化采集，撤销其岗位及所在部门，年底以“客观情况重大变化”为由解除劳动合同。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'2024年年初，公司决定转向AI主导的自动化数据采集，随即撤销了'; '到2024年底，公司以“劳动合同订立时所依据的客观情况发生重大变化”为由，解除与'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The worker joined the company on 1 July 2009 doing manual map-data collection; in early 2024 the company moved that work to AI-led automated data collection and abolished the post, and on 26 December 2024 it terminated the contract citing a major change in objective circumstances.","causal_attribution":"The employer's actions and stated reason as recorded in the bureau's typical case; all three outlets relay that one release."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'某科技公司引入AI技术属于企业主动进行的技术革新与商业决策'; '公司将技术迭代带来的经营风险直接转嫁给劳动者，并以此为由解除劳动合同，缺乏事实与法律依据。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'仲裁委依据相关规定，认定公司违法解除劳动合同。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'最终，仲裁委员会裁定该公司的行为属于违法解除。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The arbitration commission found the termination unlawful, holding that introducing AI was the company's own business decision and that the company had shifted the risk of technical change onto the worker.","causal_attribution":"The commission's finding as released by the bureau; the award itself was not read."}],"effects":[{"label":"dismissed after the employer moved the map-data collection work to AI-led automated collection","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the arbitration commission found the dismissal unlawful","claim_id":"c3","direction":"positive"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.cnr.cn/bj/oiue/20251226/t20251226_527473921.shtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translation. The page was served in GBK encoding and decoded before reading. A reporter's account of the bureau meeting that released the cases.","independence_group":"beijing-labour-arbitration-typical-cases-dec-2025"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.chinanews.com.cn/sh/2025/12-29/10542198.shtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translation. A commentary, credited to Beijing Youth Daily, that summarises the same released case.","independence_group":"beijing-labour-arbitration-typical-cases-dec-2025"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://global.hk01.com/%E5%A4%A7%E5%9B%BD%E5%B0%8F%E4%BA%8B/60307355/%E7%BC%93%E8%A7%A3ai%E6%8A%A2-%E9%A5%AD%E7%A2%97-%E7%84%A6%E8%99%91-%E5%8C%97%E4%BA%AC%E4%BA%BA%E7%A4%BE%E5%B1%80-%E4%BB%A5ai%E6%9B%BF%E4%BB%A3%E5%B2%97%E4%BD%8D%E8%A7%A3%E9%9B%87%E5%91%98%E5%B7%A5%E5%B1%9E%E8%BF%9D%E6%B3%95","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translation. Relays Beijing Daily's report of the same bureau release.","independence_group":"beijing-labour-arbitration-typical-cases-dec-2025"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["The employer's name and what AI system took over the collection work.","The dates of the arbitration application and award, and the compensation awarded.","Whether the company challenged the award in court."],"geography":{"basis":"The case is one of the Beijing human resources and social security bureau's typical cases decided by Beijing arbitration bodies, and the employer is described as a technology company in the Beijing case. The worker's own country is not stated.","court_countries":["CN"],"event_countries":["CN"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as an employer's consequential response to its own adoption of AI: a worker employed since 2009 was dismissed after the map-data collection work was moved to AI-led automated collection, and a Beijing arbitration commission found the dismissal unlawful. The facts rest on the Beijing human resources and social security bureau's typical case as reported by China National Radio, China News Service and HK01, which share one origin.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-17"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the employer's response to its own adoption of AI: according to the Beijing typical case as reported by China National Radio, China News Service and HK01, the company moved manual map-data collection to automated collection led by AI technology, abolished the worker's department and post, and then terminated the contract citing a major change in objective circumstances. No source describes any AI output about the worker, so the relation is recorded as unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Beijing arbitration commission rules a tech company unlawfully dismissed a map-data collector after moving the work to AI-led automated collection","summary":"A technology company in Beijing employed a worker from July 2009 as a data collector doing manual map-data collection. In early 2024 the company moved that work to automated data collection led by AI technology and abolished the worker's department and post, and on 26 December 2024 it terminated the worker's contract, citing a major change in the objective circumstances on which the contract was based. The worker applied for labour arbitration, and the arbitration commission found the dismissal unlawful, according to a typical case that the Beijing human resources and social security bureau released on 26 December 2025, as reported by China National Radio, China News Service and HK01. The commission said that introducing AI was the company's own business decision and lacked the unforeseeable and unavoidable character the contract-law provision requires, and that the company had shifted the business risk of technical change onto the worker.","incidentDate":"2024-12-26","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-12-26","aiSystem":"No AI product is named. The company replaced manual map-data collection with automated data collection led by AI technology, according to the Beijing labour arbitration typical case","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI data-collection system","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A worker employed since 2009 lost the job after the employer moved the map-data collection work to AI-led automated collection; a Beijing labour arbitration commission found the dismissal unlawful (Beijing typical case as reported by China National Radio, China News Service and HK01).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One worker was dismissed (Beijing typical case as reported by China National Radio). The worker is counted under other people harmed because the AI was the employer's system.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.cnr.cn/bj/oiue/20251226/t20251226_527473921.shtml","primarySourceLabel":"China National Radio, 26 December 2025: Beijing releases ten typical labour arbitration cases","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-17T03:10:26.65538+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-17T03:10:26.65538+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["dismissal","ai-replacement","labour-arbitration","workplace-ai","consequential-response"]},{"id":"2024-beijing-internet-court-ai-synthesised-voice-of-older-parenting-educator-in-book-sales-videos-company-liable","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'2024年，某文化公司为销售家庭育儿类图书，委托带货主播制作短视频开展商业推广。'; '主播发布的多条宣传视频中'; '公开演讲、授课的画面片段'; '同时配置AI合成音频'; '用户点击视频跳转链接，可直接进入该文化公司店铺购买图书。'; '在教育、育儿领域具有一定知名度'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'在“带货主播利用AI技术实施侵权案”中，商家未经许可合成老年人声音用于商业宣传，该声音结合音色、语调、发音节奏及社会知名度，能够识别特定老年人的'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In 2024 a culture company selling family parenting books commissioned a livestream sales host to make promotional short videos; several videos used clips of the plaintiff's public lectures with AI-synthesised audio closely resembling the plaintiff's voice, linked viewers to the company's shop, and were not authorised by the plaintiff.","causal_attribution":"The facts are the court's account in its 16 October 2026 release, relayed by The Paper (detail) and China News Service (the vice-president's summary). Both depend on the same release, so the claim is reported."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'法院审理认为，判断AI合成声音是否构成对自然人声音权益的侵害，核心在于能否识别特定自然人。'; '本案中文化公司未对素材授权情况进行审查，存在过失，与带货主播构成共同侵权，据此判决该文化公司赔礼道歉，并赔偿经济损失及维权合理支出。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'该声音结合音色、语调、发音节奏及社会知名度，能够识别特定老年人的，构成对其人格权益的侵害；委托方未尽审查注意义务的，承担连带责任。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Beijing Internet Court held that the AI-synthesised voice, used with the plaintiff's image and public profile, was identifiable as the plaintiff's and infringed the plaintiff's portrait and voice rights; it found the company, which had not checked the material's authorisation, jointly liable with the host and ordered it to apologise and compensate economic losses and reasonable costs.","causal_attribution":"The ruling is attributed to the court as relayed from its release; the judgment text was not read, so the claim is reported rather than documented. The court's finding establishes the infringement for the purposes of the case."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'在北京互联网法院10月16日发布的涉老年人网络侵权典型案例中'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'这是记者16日从北京互联网法院涉老年人网络侵权案件审理情况新闻发布会上获悉的。'; '已出现非法使用AI技术深度合成老年人肖像或声音用于不当目的的情形'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The court released the case on 16 October 2026 at a press conference on online infringement cases involving older people, and said that AI deep synthesis of older people's portraits or voices for improper purposes has appeared in such cases.","causal_attribution":"Both outlets report the same press conference."}],"effects":[{"label":"voice imitated by AI-synthesised audio and image used without consent in sales videos; court found portrait and voice rights infringed and ordered compensation (court account)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_34262393","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17; no human reviewer inspected the text. The Paper's report of a case from the Beijing Internet Court's 16 October 2026 release of typical cases on online infringement involving older people ('据通报').","independence_group":"beijing-internet-court-older-people-cases-release-2026-10-16"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.chinanews.com.cn/fz/2026/10-16/10715820.shtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17; no human reviewer inspected the text. China News Service report of the same Beijing Internet Court press conference, quoting the court's vice-president.","independence_group":"beijing-internet-court-older-people-cases-release-2026-10-16"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["The judgment date, the amounts awarded and whether the host was a party to the suit.","The tool used to synthesise the voice, the platform, and the number of videos and viewers.","The text of the judgment; both reports rest on the court's release.","How the court established that the audio was AI-synthesised; the reports do not give the technical basis."],"geography":{"basis":"The Beijing Internet Court decided the case. The reports anonymise the parties and do not say where the company or host was based, where the videos were published or where the plaintiff lives, so no event or affected-person country is recorded.","court_countries":["CN"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): according to the Beijing Internet Court's account, a sales host's promotional videos used AI-synthesised audio identifiable as an older educator's voice without consent, and the court found the commissioning company jointly liable and ordered an apology and compensation. One reporting chain (the court's release, read in two outlets); the parties are anonymised by the court.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-17"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The court's account, relayed by The Paper, says the host's videos set clips of the plaintiff's lectures to AI-synthesised audio whose timbre, intonation and rhythm closely resembled the plaintiff's voice, and the court decided the case as an AI-synthesised voice infringement; China News Service quotes the court's vice-president describing the merchant's unauthorised synthesis of the older person's voice. The AI output is the synthesised voice imitating the plaintiff (depicted_or_impersonated), which the court found identifiable and infringing. The tool is not named.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Beijing Internet Court says a sales host's videos for a book company used an older parenting educator's AI-synthesised voice without consent; company liable","summary":"According to the Beijing Internet Court's account, released on 16 October 2026 among typical cases on online infringement involving older people, a culture company selling family parenting books commissioned a livestream sales host in 2024 to make promotional short videos. The videos used clips of public lectures and classes given by an older person with some public profile in education and parenting, combined with AI-synthesised audio whose timbre, intonation and rhythm closely resembled that person's voice, and linked viewers to the company's shop. Neither the images nor the audio had been authorised. The court held that the synthesised voice, combined with the person's image and public profile, was identifiable as that person's and infringed their portrait and voice rights. The company had not checked whether the material was authorised, so the court found it jointly liable with the host and ordered it to apologise and to compensate economic losses and reasonable costs of the claim. The amounts, the judgment date and the tool are not reported.","incidentDate":"2024-01-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-16","aiSystem":"AI-synthesised audio, made with a tool the court account does not name, whose timbre, intonation and speech rhythm closely resembled the plaintiff's voice, set over clips of the plaintiff's public lectures in a livestream sales host's promotional short videos (court account)","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the Beijing Internet Court's account, AI-synthesised audio identifiable as an older educator's voice was used without consent, with clips of the educator's lectures, to sell books; the court found the person's portrait and voice rights infringed and ordered the commissioning company to apologise and compensate economic losses and costs.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the plaintiff whose voice and image the court found were used without authorisation (court account relayed by The Paper). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"elderly","jurisdiction":"CN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_34262393","primarySourceLabel":"The Paper, 16 October 2026: court case on AI-cloned voice of an older person used in livestream book sales","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-17T03:03:46.98321+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-17T03:03:46.98321+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["voice-cloning","voice-rights","portrait-rights","livestream-selling","court-ruling","older-people","beijing","china","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2024-beijing-court-rules-insurer-unlawfully-dismissed-legal-officer-over-ai-platform-upload","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'在某保险公司担任法务，负责合规稽查、风险核查等工作。2024年7月，为优化工作流程、提升PPT制作及数据分析效率'; '在公司领导推荐下，将自行整理加工后的公司稽核问题数据表，上传至第三方AI平台用于辅助办公'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'2024年7月，为优化工作流程、提升PPT制作及数据分析效率，她在公司领导推荐下，将自行整理加工后的公司稽核问题数据表上传至第三方AI平台辅助办公'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A legal officer at an insurance company, responsible for compliance audits and risk checks, uploaded a company audit-issues data table she had compiled and processed to a third-party AI platform in July 2024, to help make presentations and analyse data, on the recommendation of company leadership.","causal_attribution":"The court's account as relayed by two outlets that share it as their source."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'2024年8月，公司却突然向'; '出具《解除劳动合同告知书》'; '“严重违反规章制度”为由，单方解除了双方劳动关系'; '其将公司稽核类内部文件上传至第三方AI平台，平台会收集、留存用户数据用于模型迭代，存在信息泄露、被第三方窃取的重大风险'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'一个月后，公司向她出具《解除劳动合同告知书》，理由是'; '“严重违反规章制度”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In August 2024 the company served a notice terminating her labour contract for serious violation of its rules, arguing that as a compliance employee bound by a confidentiality agreement she had uploaded internal audit files to a platform that collects and retains user data for model iteration, creating a risk of leakage.","causal_attribution":"The company's stated reason for the dismissal, as recounted in the court's account; the dismissal responded to the employee's use of the AI platform."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'认为，自己没有泄密的主观故意，使用AI工具是为了提高工作效率，上传至AI的数据表已经过整理加工，并非公司核心保密信息，属于合规办公，此次操作也并未造成公司信息外泄或经济损失等现实后果'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The employee said she had no intent to disclose secrets, that the uploaded table had been processed and was not core confidential information, and that no leak or economic loss resulted.","causal_attribution":"The employee's position as recounted in the court's account."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'朝阳法院审理认为'; '不存在违反规章制度的主观故意'; '所有内部规章制度均未明确禁止员工使用第三方AI工具辅助办公'; '公司未针对AI工具使用开展任何专项培训'; '公司仅以AI平台存在数据留存的通用规则，推定存在泄密风险，不足以认定员工行为构成“严重违反规章制度”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'法院还指出，公司未能举证证明'; '上传的文件属于法定或制度界定的核心保密信息，也无法证实该行为造成了信息外泄、经济损失或声誉受损等实际后果'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Chaoyang District People's Court found that she had no intent to breach the rules, that none of the company's rules expressly prohibited third-party AI tools, that the company had given no training on them, and that the platform's general data-retention rules did not establish a serious violation.","causal_attribution":"The court's reasoning as relayed by the press; the judgment text was not inspected."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'依法判决撤销其向'; '作出的《解除劳动合同告知书》，双方继续履行劳动合同，同时判令保险公司向'; '支付因违法解约产生的年终奖差额、绩效工资、工资损失等。目前，该判决已经生效'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'一审认定保险公司单方解除行为违法，判决撤销解除告知书、双方继续履行劳动合同，并判令公司支付年终奖差额、绩效工资及工资损失，目前判决已生效'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'法院一审认定，公司单方解除行为违法，判决撤销解除通知、双方继续履行合同，并补发年终奖差额、绩效工资及工资损失。判决已生效'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The court ruled at first instance that the dismissal was unlawful, revoked the termination notice, ordered the labour contract to continue and ordered the insurer to pay the year-end bonus shortfall, performance pay and lost wages; the judgment has taken effect.","causal_attribution":"Reports of the judgment that all derive from the court's disclosure, so the claim stays reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"employee dismissed by her employer for uploading a work data table to a third-party AI platform","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"employee lost year-end bonus, performance pay and wages through the dismissal, which a court ordered the insurer to make good","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://xinwen.bjd.com.cn/content/s6acee3f7e4b0e42f8f0189ec.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese in full. Quotations and their English renderings in this record were translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed them. Beijing Daily's own report (reporter credited) of the Chaoyang court's account of the case.","independence_group":"chaoyang-court-account-oct-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://news.mydrivers.com/1/1157/1157186.htm","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese in full. Quotations and their English renderings in this record were translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed them. Kuai Keji relays the case from China National Radio (Voice of China); the court is the underlying source, so it shares an independence group with Beijing Daily.","independence_group":"chaoyang-court-account-oct-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.mrjjxw.com/articles/2026-10-14/4604034.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese in full. Quotations and their English renderings in this record were translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed them. A signed commentary in National Business Daily that summarises the court's disclosure of the case; it adds no independent reporting.","independence_group":"chaoyang-court-account-oct-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["The name of the insurer and of the AI platform.","The date of the judgment and the amounts ordered.","Whether the employee returned to work after the ruling.","Whether the platform retained or used the uploaded table."],"geography":{"basis":"The ruling was given by the Chaoyang District People's Court in Beijing. No source states where the insurer or the employee was located, so the event and affected-person countries are left unrecorded rather than inferred from the court's seat.","court_countries":["CN"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as an employer's dismissal of a named-role employee for her own use of a third-party AI platform, followed by a court ruling, now effective, that the dismissal was unlawful. The facts are the court's account as reported by the press; the judgment itself was not read.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the employer's response to the employee's own use of AI. In the court's account relayed by Beijing Daily and Kuai Keji, she uploaded a compiled company audit data table to a third-party AI platform to help with presentations and data analysis, and the company's termination notice treated that upload, and the platform's retention of user data for model iteration, as a serious breach of its rules. No source says the AI platform produced any output about the employee or that any output reached the decision, so the relation is unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Beijing court rules an insurer unlawfully dismissed a legal officer for uploading an internal audit table to a third-party AI platform","summary":"A legal officer at an insurance company, responsible for compliance audits and risk checks, uploaded a company audit-issues data table that she had compiled and processed to a third-party AI platform in July 2024, to help make presentations and analyse data. According to the court's account, she did so on the recommendation of company leadership. In August 2024 the company served her a notice terminating her labour contract for serious violation of its rules, arguing that as a compliance employee bound by a confidentiality agreement she had exposed internal audit material to a platform that collects and retains user data for model iteration. The Chaoyang District People's Court in Beijing ruled at first instance that the dismissal was unlawful: the company's rules did not prohibit third-party AI tools, it had given no training on their use, and it had not shown that the table was core confidential information or that any leak or loss occurred. The court revoked the termination notice, ordered the contract to continue and ordered the company to pay the employee's year-end bonus shortfall, performance pay and lost wages. Kuai Keji, citing China National Radio, reported the ruling on 13 October 2026 and Beijing Daily on 14 October; both say the judgment has taken effect. No source names the insurer or the AI platform.","incidentDate":"2024-08-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-13","aiSystem":"A third-party AI platform, not named in any source, to which the employee uploaded a compiled company audit-issues data table to help make presentations and analyse data","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI presentation and data-analysis tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The employee lost her job in August 2024 over her upload of a work data table to a third-party AI platform; the Chaoyang court later ruled the dismissal unlawful and ordered the insurer to pay the year-end bonus shortfall, performance pay and wage losses arising from it (court's account as reported by Beijing Daily and Kuai Keji). Whether the sums have been paid is not reported.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One employee: the claimant in the reported labour dispute, who used the AI platform herself.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://xinwen.bjd.com.cn/content/s6acee3f7e4b0e42f8f0189ec.html","primarySourceLabel":"Beijing Daily, 14 October 2026: 用外部AI处理内部文件遭公司辞退？法院判决：企业违法！","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-15T03:00:01.598786+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-15T03:00:01.598786+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["dismissal","workplace-ai","labour-dispute","reinstatement","insurance","consequential-response"]},{"id":"2024-toledo-ohio-flock-alpr-misread-plate-gunpoint-stop-police-dog-bite-charges-dropped","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'TPD was alerted to a stolen license plate by a FLOCK camera. It turns out, that information was wrong.'; 'With guns drawn, officers tell the driver multiple times to get out of the truck.'; 'was then arrested and charged with resisting arrest and obstruction.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'begins to kneel, an officer releases the K-9 on him, the footage shows.'; 'a traffic stop involving a K-9 on April 11, 2024.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 11 April 2024 a Toledo police officer, alerted by a Flock camera to a stolen plate, stopped the man's pickup; officers drew their guns and ordered him out, a K-9 handler released a police dog on him, and he was arrested and charged with resisting arrest and obstruction.","causal_attribution":"Police report and released body-camera footage as reported by 13abc and ABC News; both outlets rely on the same department records."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The FLOCK camera captured an image that came back to a Chevy Malibu but is pictured on the back of a late model red Dodge Ram pickup truck.'; 'So it was a misread. But I stopped it.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'was a \"mishit\" or \"misread\" by the license plate reader'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'A camera made by the technology startup Flock Safety misread the \"7\" on'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The camera had misread the plate: the plate on the pickup was not the stolen plate, and the officer can be heard on body-camera audio calling it a misread.","causal_attribution":"Police records and body-camera audio as reported; Business Insider specifies the misread digit from police records."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'will receive a departmental reprimand for failing to visually verify the license plate with the information received from the license plate reader.'; 'determined officers who released a K-9 on a man during a traffic stop acted within TPD policy.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The Toledo police chief found the dog deployment within policy and said the officer who made the stop would be reprimanded for failing to visually verify the plate with the information from the license-plate reader.","causal_attribution":"Police chief's statement as quoted by 13abc."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'he was bitten seven times on his forearm and elbow by the K-9 after being pulled over on April 11 and has been unable to work since.'; 'traumatized for real'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The man told ABC News that the dog bit him seven times on his forearm and elbow, that he had been unable to work since, and that he was traumatized.","causal_attribution":"His own account to ABC News."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The bite caused serious injuries to his arm, and he lost feeling in his fingers, he said.'; 'He sold his truck to keep up with his rent'; 'He was eventually evicted'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"Business Insider reports that the bite caused serious arm injuries and loss of feeling in his fingers, that he quit his lawn-care business and forklift job, sold his truck and was evicted.","causal_attribution":"His own account to Business Insider."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'prosecutors dropped the all the charges, including the later addition of Failure to Comply.'; 'The information from the camera turned out to be wrong and the license plate was not stolen.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Prosecutors dropped all charges against him, including a later failure-to-comply charge, on 19 August 2024.","causal_attribution":"His attorneys as reported by 13abc."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'it is commonly known throughout the Toledo Police Department that the Flock system is unreliable and often misreads license plates.'; 'He settled the case in October for $35,000.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"He sued the officer and the city, alleging that the Flock system was known in the department to be unreliable, and settled the case for $35,000.","causal_attribution":"Lawsuit allegation and settlement as reported by Business Insider; the complaint and settlement record were not read."}],"effects":[{"label":"held at gunpoint, bitten by a police dog and arrested after a misread license-plate-camera alert flagged his plate as stolen","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"says he was traumatized and unable to work after the bites","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"},{"label":"reported lasting arm injury and loss of his business, truck and home","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.13abc.com/2024/04/15/body-cam-tpd-officers-releasing-k-9-man-during-traffic-stop/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-04 (13abc/WTVG, 15 April 2024). Reports the police report and released body-camera footage.","independence_group":"wtvg-13abc-toledo-police-records"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://abcnews.com/US/man-speaks-after-police-release-9-traffic-stop/story?id=109463145","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-04 (ABC News, 20 April 2024). Interview with the driver plus its own review of the police body-camera footage.","independence_group":"abc-news-interview"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.13abc.com/2024/05/31/tpd-investigation-finds-no-wrongdoing-use-k-9-man-during-traffic-stop/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-04 (13abc/WTVG, 31 May 2024). Quotes the Toledo police chief's statement on the internal review.","independence_group":"wtvg-13abc-toledo-police-records"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.13abc.com/2024/08/19/charges-dropped-against-man-toledo-police-released-k-9-during-traffic-stop-lawyer-says/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-04 (13abc/WTVG, 19 August 2024). Reports the dismissal from the man's attorneys.","independence_group":"wtvg-13abc-toledo-police-records"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.businessinsider.com/flock-safety-alpr-cameras-misreads-2026-3","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-04 (Business Insider, 9 March 2026); the page is marked subscriber-only but the full article text was present in the served page and its JSON-LD articleBody. Draws on police records, the lawsuit and an interview.","independence_group":"business-insider-records-review"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["The lawsuit's court and case number; the complaint and settlement record were not read.","Whether the misread came from plate condition, a plate cover or the camera itself; no source gives a cause.","How long he was held in the county jail beyond Business Insider's statement that it was hours."],"geography":{"basis":"The stop took place in Toledo, Ohio, and the man is described as of Toledo (13abc, ABC News); the charges were brought and dropped by local prosecutors and his lawsuit was settled before a federal judge (13abc; Business Insider).","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional-use case consistent with the held Flock misread rows: the police report, body-camera audio and the police chief's statement (13abc) establish that a Flock license-plate-reader alert misread the plate and prompted the stop; the man's own accounts to ABC News and Business Insider describe the injuries and losses. He is not named here.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-04"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The police report (as reported by 13abc) says officers were alerted to a stolen license plate by a Flock camera and that the information was wrong; on the body-camera audio the officer calls it a misread; the police chief reprimanded the officer for failing to visually verify the plate with the information received from the license-plate reader. Business Insider, citing police records, reports the camera misread a 7 as a 2 and describes the cameras as Flock's AI cameras. The plate match against a stolen-plate record is the automated system's claim about his truck; drawing guns, releasing the dog and the arrest were officers' decisions.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["made_claim_about"]},"name":"Toledo, Ohio: police stopped a man's pickup at gunpoint in April 2024 after a Flock license-plate camera misread his plate as stolen, released a police dog that bit him, and charged him; prosecutors dropped the charges and he later settled a lawsuit for $35,000","summary":"On 11 April 2024 Toledo police officers stopped a pickup truck after a Flock license-plate camera alerted them to a stolen plate. According to the police report and body-camera footage reported by 13abc and ABC News, the camera had misread the plate, which was not stolen. Officers drew their guns, ordered the driver out and to the ground, and a K-9 handler released a police dog as he began to kneel. The driver told ABC News he was bitten seven times on his forearm and elbow, was traumatized and could not work; he was arrested and charged with obstruction, resisting arrest and, later, failure to comply. Prosecutors dropped all charges in August 2024. The department found the dog deployment within policy and reprimanded the officer who made the stop for failing to visually verify the plate against the reader's information. Business Insider reported in March 2026 that police records show the camera read a 7 on the plate as a 2, that the man lost feeling in his fingers, gave up his lawn-care business and forklift work, sold his truck and was evicted, and that he had sued the officer and the city and settled in October for $35,000.","incidentDate":"2024-04-11","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2024-04-15","aiSystem":"Flock Safety automated license-plate-reader camera (described by Business Insider as one of Flock's AI cameras) that read the pickup's plate, matched the misread plate to a stolen-plate record and alerted a Toledo police officer","aiProduct":"Flock Safety license plate readers","aiCompany":"Flock Safety","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["physical_injury","loss_of_liberty","psychological_distress","financial_loss","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The driver was held at gunpoint, bitten repeatedly by a police dog, arrested and jailed for hours and charged; he says he was traumatized and could not work, and Business Insider reports lasting arm injuries, the loss of his business and truck, and eviction (his accounts to ABC News and Business Insider). The charges were dropped.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the driver, held at gunpoint, bitten and arrested (13abc, ABC News, Business Insider). His cousin was a passenger; no source reports harm to the cousin. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-OH","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_settled","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.13abc.com/2024/04/15/body-cam-tpd-officers-releasing-k-9-man-during-traffic-stop/","primarySourceLabel":"13abc (WTVG), 15 April 2024: Body cam of TPD officers releasing K-9 on man during traffic stop","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-04T03:31:44.811835+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-04T03:31:44.811835+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["flock","alpr","license-plate-reader","misread","wrongful-stop","gunpoint","police-dog","ohio","toledo","justice","made-claim-about","settlement"]},{"id":"2024-us-otter-notetaker-recorded-non-users-meetings-privacy-suit","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'participated in a Zoom meeting in California on February'; '24, 2025, where the Otter Notetaker was used by a meeting participant to transcribe the'; 'participated in a Zoom meeting in California in March 2025'; 'used Zoom to communicate with a medical professional, and'; 'Illinois on January 10, 2025 and May 19, 2025 where the Otter Notetaker was used to'; 'participated in a Zoom meeting in Washington state in March'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Plaintiffs are seven individuals from California, Illinois, and Washington state who'; 'participated in virtual meetings where the Otter Notetaker was allegedly used without their'; 'consent to record, transcribe, and store the contents of their communications.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Otter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the'; 'allegations concerning the named Plaintiff’s personal knowledge, experiences, expectations, or'","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'who alleges his privacy was \"severely invaded\" upon realizing Otter was secretly recording a confidential conversation.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"Seven people who were not Otter account holders allege that, on Zoom or Microsoft Teams calls (six give dates between March 2024 and May 2025), another participant used Otter Notetaker and Otter recorded, transcribed and stored their conversations without their consent; the calls include one with a medical professional and meetings with a financial professional.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiffs attribute the recording to Otter's product design, which they say lets the notetaker record without every participant's consent; Otter denies the allegations."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'other personal information for its own commercial use, including to train its automatic speech'; 'The Illinois Plaintiffs allege that, during their virtual meetings, Otter'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Otter claims that before the audio of meetings is fed into its machine learning systems to help improve an AI speech recognition feature, it is \"de-identified,\"'","relation":"context","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The plaintiffs allege that Otter keeps their conversational data on its servers and uses it to train its speech-recognition and machine-learning models, and that it captured the Illinois plaintiffs' voiceprints; Otter's policy, as reported by NPR, says it trains on transcripts with users' permission and de-identifies audio.","causal_attribution":"Alleged by the plaintiffs; Otter denies the allegations."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'felt frustrated, embarrassed, and stressed to learn that his'; 'conversation was recorded without his consent, and his information, voice, and'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"One California plaintiff alleges that he felt frustrated, embarrassed and stressed to learn that his conversation had been recorded without his consent.","causal_attribution":"Alleged by the plaintiffs as a consequence of Otter's recording."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Accordingly, the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims for lack of standing is denied.'; 'Accordingly, the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ ECPA claim is denied.'; 'Accordingly, the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ BIPA claims for lack of standing is denied.'; 'The motion to dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend as to Count 2'; 'The motion is DENIED in all other respects.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 13 August 2026 the court denied Otter's motion to dismiss for lack of standing, holding that the alleged interception and retention of private conversations was a concrete injury, let the federal wiretap, California eavesdropping and Illinois biometric claims proceed, and dismissed some other claims.","causal_attribution":"Procedural ruling on the pleadings; no finding that Otter recorded anyone unlawfully."}],"effects":[{"label":"the plaintiffs say Otter's notetaker recorded, transcribed and stored their conversations on calls they joined, without their consent, including a medical call and calls with a financial professional","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the plaintiffs say their conversations stay on Otter's servers for training its models and that it captured voiceprints of the Illinois plaintiffs","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"one plaintiff says he felt frustrated, embarrassed and stressed to learn he had been recorded","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.35.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Consolidated Class Action Complaint, ECF 35, filed 5 December 2025; RECAP PDF (68 pages) read on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200), plaintiffs' experience sections read in full. Plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.68.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Order Granting Motion to Dismiss in Part, ECF 68, 13 August 2026 (Judge Eumi K. Lee); RECAP PDF read in full on 2026-09-29. Rules on the pleadings and accepts the allegations as true for that purpose; it makes no finding of fact.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.80.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Otter.ai's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs' Consolidated Class Action Complaint, ECF 80, 17 September 2026; RECAP PDF read on 2026-09-29, plaintiff-experience paragraphs and responses read.","independence_group":"otter-answer"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Brewer v. Otter.ai, Inc., original Class Action Complaint, ECF 1, filed 15 August 2025; RECAP PDF read on 2026-09-29.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.npr.org/2025/08/15/g-s1-83087/otter-ai-transcription-class-action-lawsuit","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"NPR, 15 August 2025, read live on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200). Reports the original complaint and summarises Otter's privacy policy; says neither side responded to requests for comment.","independence_group":"plaintiffs-account"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.79.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order, ECF 79, 16 September 2026; read on 2026-09-29. Procedural facts only.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","work","health","finance"],"unknowns":["Whether Otter's product notified the plaintiffs on their calls that the notetaker was present, and what the other participants' Otter settings were.","Whether the plaintiffs' conversations were in fact used to train Otter's models, and in what form.","The exact date of one Illinois plaintiff's meetings, which the complaint places only within the limitations period."],"geography":{"basis":"The consolidated complaint places the plaintiffs' calls in California, in Chicago and elsewhere in Illinois, and in Washington state; the order describes the plaintiffs as individuals from California, Illinois and Washington state. The case is in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a bounded series of concrete privacy harms reported by identified people in a pending federal suit: each named plaintiff describes a call on which another participant's AI notetaker recorded and transcribed them without consent. The account rests on the plaintiffs' pleadings and the court's ruling on them; Otter denies the allegations. Plaintiff names are omitted.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Each plaintiff alleges that another participant's Otter account joined the Otter Notetaker, an AI transcription assistant, to a Zoom or Microsoft Teams call the plaintiff was on, and that the notetaker recorded, transcribed and stored the plaintiff's conversation on Otter's servers without the plaintiff's knowledge or consent (ECF 35, the consolidated complaint; the court's 13 August 2026 order summarises the same allegation). That alleged capture of the plaintiffs' conversations by an AI service is the reported harm. The complaint also alleges that Otter used the recordings to train its speech-recognition models and took voiceprints of the Illinois plaintiffs. Otter admits it offers an AI meeting assistant called Otter Notetaker but says it lacks knowledge of the plaintiffs' calls and denies the allegations. The capture is alleged, not established, so the status is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["received_personal_information"]},"name":"United States: seven people who say they had no Otter account allege its AI Notetaker recorded calls without consent; a judge let core privacy claims proceed","summary":"Seven people in California, Illinois and Washington state are suing Otter.ai in a consolidated class action in the Northern District of California. Each says another meeting participant used Otter's AI Notetaker on a Zoom or Microsoft Teams call they joined, and that Otter recorded, transcribed and stored their conversation without their consent; six of them date their calls between March 2024 and May 2025. They say they were not Otter account holders. The calls they describe include a medical consultation, meetings with a financial professional and work discussions. They allege that Otter keeps the recordings and uses them to train its speech-recognition models, that it captured voiceprints of the Illinois plaintiffs, and one of them says learning of the recording left him frustrated, embarrassed and stressed. On 13 August 2026 the court found that the alleged interception of private conversations was a concrete injury and let the federal wiretap, California eavesdropping and Illinois biometric claims proceed, while dismissing some claims. Otter's answer to the consolidated complaint, filed on 17 September 2026, says it lacks knowledge of the plaintiffs' experiences and denies the allegations.","incidentDate":"2024-03-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-05-19","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2025-08-15","aiSystem":"Otter Notetaker, Otter.ai's AI meeting assistant, joined to Zoom and Microsoft Teams calls by another participant's Otter account","aiProduct":"Otter Notetaker","aiCompany":"Otter.ai, Inc.","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["other_material_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The plaintiffs allege that Otter recorded, transcribed and kept their private conversations on calls they joined without their consent, including medical and financial discussions, used them to train its models and took voiceprints, and one plaintiff says learning this left him frustrated, embarrassed and stressed (plaintiffs' allegations in a pending suit; Otter denies them).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":7,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"The court order says 'Plaintiffs are seven individuals from California, Illinois, and Washington state' who participated in meetings where the Otter Notetaker was allegedly used without their consent; each describes their own call in the consolidated complaint. They were not Otter account holders (one says only that to her knowledge she did not create an account), so they are counted as other people. The proposed class members are not counted. Documented minimum 7.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.454675/gov.uscourts.cand.454675.68.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Order granting motion to dismiss in part, In re Otter.AI Privacy Litigation, No. 5:25-cv-06911-EKL (N.D. Cal.), 13 August 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T09:04:08.493618+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:15:43.76525+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["otter-ai","ai-notetaker","meeting-transcription","privacy","wiretap","bipa","voiceprint","training-data","class-action","non-user"]},{"id":"2025-tsuda-v-tiktok-ai-voice-imitation-tokyo","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'生成AI（人工知能）によって自身の声を無断で模倣した動画が公開されているとして、人気声優の津田健次郎さんが、TikTok（ティックトック）の運営会社に動画の削除を求めて東京地裁に提訴していたことが23日分かった。'; '2024年7月〜25年9月、津田さんの声質を模したナレーションを付け、都市伝説やオカルト、雑学をテーマとした動画を188本投稿したとされる。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'訴状などによると、２０２４年７月～２５年９月、都市伝説や陰謀論を扱う画像に津田さんの声質を模したナレーションを付けた動画１８８件が投稿された。'; '動画には「ツダケンの声がする」「声が似ている」などのコメントが相次いだ。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'訴状によると、問題の動画アカウントは2024年7月以降、津田さんの声を模したナレーションで都市伝説や心霊現象を語る内容で、少なくとも188件投稿した。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"According to Mr Tsuda's complaint, an account run by an unidentified person posted at least 188 videos between July 2024 and September 2025 narrated by a generative-AI imitation of his voice, without his permission, and viewers commented that the voice sounded like him.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiff's allegations as reported from the complaint and his lawyer (one chain); the court has not ruled."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'ティックトックには再生回数に応じて金銭が支払われる仕組みがあり、月50万〜75万円の収益を上げたとしている。'; '提訴は25年11月。この時点で投稿者は21万人以上のフォロワーを有し、動画の平均再生回数は147万回に上るという。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'動画の再生数に応じて投稿者は月50万～75万円の収益を上げていた、と津田さん側は主張している。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"His side says the account had about 210,000 followers when he sued in November 2025, videos averaged 1.47 million views, and the poster earned 500,000 to 750,000 yen a month from TikTok's view-based payments.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiff's figures; not independently verified."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'これに対して運営会社側は「投稿者は『友人の声を生成ＡＩに学習させた』と述べており、普遍的な男性の声にすぎない」などと反論。提訴後に動画データがアカウントごと削除されたとし、「訴えの利益はない」として請求却下も求めている。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'一方、ティックトック側は答弁書で、問題の音声が「津田さんと『同一の声』かどうかは客観的に明らかではない」などと反論。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'25年8月、東京地裁がティックトック側に投稿者の情報の開示を命じたが、開示された情報が古く、投稿者の特定に至らなかったという。'","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"TikTok's operator disputes the claim, saying it is not objectively clear the voice is the same as his and that it is a generic male voice, that the poster said they had trained AI on a friend's voice, and that the account and videos were deleted after the suit was filed; it asks for the claim to be dismissed.","causal_attribution":"Defendant's position as reported."},{"id":"c4","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'高橋裁判長は判決理由で、一般論として人の声は「肖像と同様に個人の人格の象徴と言える」と指摘。実演家の声を無断で使用する行為は、もっぱらその声がもつ顧客吸引力の利用が目的と認められる場合にはパブリシティー権の侵害に当たるとの考え方を示した。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'判決は、人の声は容姿と同じように「個人の人格の象徴といえる」と指摘。'; '人の声が法的な保護の対象になると認めた司法判断は初めて。'; '声優らの声を無断で使う行為について、その声に商品の販売などを促す顧客吸引力があり、もっぱらその声の顧客吸引力を利用する目的で使っている場合は「パブリシティー権の侵害にあたると解するのが相当だ」と述べた。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'30日の判決で東京地裁は「人の声は肖像と同様に個人の人格の象徴」と指摘しました。'; 'そのうえで実演家の声を無断で使用することについて、顧客吸引力の利用する目的があれば「パブリシティー権」の侵害に当たるとする初めての判断を示しました。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'模倣された声が入った動画の削除を求めた訴訟の判決が３０日、東京地裁で言い渡される。生成ＡＩによる声の権利侵害を巡る初の訴訟で'","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'ベテラン声優らは「声の権利を認めてほしい」と訴え、津田健次郎さんが起こした訴訟の判決を見守っている。'","relation":"context","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"On 30 September 2026 the Tokyo District Court held, as a general principle, that a person's voice is a symbol of individual personality like a likeness, and that using a performer's voice without permission solely to exploit its power to attract customers infringes the right of publicity; it was described as the first such judicial finding in Japan.","causal_attribution":"Court's general holding as reported by three outlets that each reported the judgment; the judgment text itself was not read."},{"id":"c5","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'ただ今回の動画はすでに運営会社のサーバーからも削除されているとし、これ以上削除する義務を負っておらず原告の請求は理由がないと結論付けた。問題の動画がパブリシティー権を侵害しているかは判断を示さなかった。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'一方で判決は、今回の裁判で津田さん側が問題とした動画は削除済みだと認定。津田さんの声の権利が侵害されたかについては判断しなかった。'; 'ただ、今回の事例では動画がすでに消えており、ティックトックの運営会社に削除義務はないと判断。津田さん側の請求は退けた。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'一方で、動画の削除についてはアカウントがすでに削除されているため、削除義務がないとし、津田さん側の請求を退けました。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"The court dismissed Mr Tsuda's claim because the videos had already been deleted, so TikTok's operator had no duty to delete them, and it did not decide whether the videos infringed his publicity right.","causal_attribution":"Court's disposition as reported; no finding that the videos imitate or infringe his voice."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'原告側は津田さんの声と混同させて月50万〜75万円の収益を得ていたなどとして、不正競争防止法違反にも当たると主張したが、この点については判決は言及しなかった。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"According to Nikkei, the judgment did not address his separate argument that the videos breached the Unfair Competition Prevention Act by passing them off as his voice.","causal_attribution":"Single report (Nikkei)."},{"id":"c7","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'今年5月には投稿者がアカウントを削除した。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'提訴後の今年5月、投稿者がアカウントを削除し、問題の動画は表示されなくなっていた。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"The poster deleted the account in May 2026, after the suit was filed.","causal_attribution":"Reported by Nikkei and the Asahi Shimbun from the proceedings."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'判決後、津田さんの代理人弁護士は控訴しない方針を示した。'; 'ティックトックの運営会社は「今後も、テクノロジーの発展と権利保護のバランスのとれた在り方について、誠実に取り組んでいく」とコメントした。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"After the judgment his lawyer said they did not plan to appeal, and TikTok's operator said it would keep working on a balance between technological development and rights protection.","causal_attribution":"Statements reported by the Asahi Shimbun."}],"effects":[{"label":"voice allegedly imitated by generative AI without permission in at least 188 monetised TikTok videos that viewers associated with him","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2026092600287&g=soc","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-09-28; summarised in English by the researcher (no human translation). Reports the complaint and TikTok's filings. Re-read on 2026-10-01.","independence_group":"tsuda-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUD231K30T20C26A5000000/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-09-28 (23 May 2026); sourced to the plaintiff's lawyer and the complaint. Researcher translation. Re-read on 2026-10-01.","independence_group":"tsuda-complaint"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASV5T2J1LV5TUTIL00FM.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-09-28 (May 2026); the visible article text was read and quotes the complaint and TikTok's answer. Researcher translation. Re-read on 2026-10-01.","independence_group":"tsuda-complaint"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2026092600297&g=soc","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-09-28 (26 September 2026). Industry context; does not add facts about the Tsuda videos. Researcher translation. Re-read on 2026-10-01.","independence_group":"jiji-industry-feature"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUD262B00W6A920C2000000/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-10-01 (30 September 2026 judgment report by Nikkei; photo credited to Kyodo). Researcher translation.","independence_group":"nikkei-judgment-report"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASV9Z11V1V9ZUTIL02SM.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-10-01; the visible text before the paywall was read (about 1,000 characters remain unread). Bylined by the Asahi Tokyo city news court reporter. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"asahi-judgment-report"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://news.tv-asahi.co.jp/news_society/articles/900200797.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-10-01 (TV Asahi running summary of the 30 September 2026 judgment). Researcher translation.","independence_group":"tv-asahi-judgment-report"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["Who ran the account and which AI tool produced the voice (a court-ordered disclosure in August 2025 did not identify the poster, according to the Asahi Shimbun).","Whether the voice was modelled on Mr Tsuda's voice and whether the videos infringed his publicity right; the court dismissed the claim because the videos had already been deleted, without deciding either.","Mr Tsuda's own account of personal or financial effects; no statement from him was read.","The full judgment text; it was not read, and the court's reasoning is taken from news reports."],"geography":{"basis":"Mr Tsuda is a Japanese voice actor working in Japan and the suit is in the Tokyo District Court (Nikkei; Jiji). The poster is unidentified and the place where the videos were made is not reported, so no event country is recorded.","court_countries":["JP"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["JP"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case (a generative-AI voice alleged to impersonate a real, named performer in monetised videos). Updated after the 30 September 2026 judgment: the facts of the videos come from his complaint as reported by Nikkei, the Asahi Shimbun and Jiji Press, with TikTok's rebuttal; the ruling is taken from Nikkei, Asahi and TV Asahi reports. Imitation and infringement remain undecided because the court dismissed the claim on the ground that the videos had already been deleted. Mr Tsuda is a public figure suing in his own name; the poster is unidentified.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-01"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges generative-AI imitation of his voice (Nikkei; Asahi; Jiji). TikTok's side and the poster reportedly say the voice was generated by AI trained on a friend's voice, so AI generation is asserted by both sides; whether it imitates Tsuda was not decided by the court, which dismissed the claim because the videos had been deleted.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Tokyo: voice actor Kenjiro Tsuda sued TikTok's operator over at least 188 monetised videos he says were narrated by a generative-AI imitation of his voice; on 30 September 2026 the Tokyo District Court held that a voice can be protected by publicity rights but dismissed his deletion claim because the videos had already been deleted","summary":"Kenjiro Tsuda, a Japanese voice actor known for roles in Jujutsu Kaisen, sued the operator of TikTok in the Tokyo District Court in November 2025, seeking removal of videos he says use a generative-AI imitation of his voice without permission. According to his complaint, as reported by Jiji Press, Nikkei and the Asahi Shimbun, an account run by an unidentified person posted at least 188 short videos on urban legends, the occult and trivia between July 2024 and September 2025, narrated in a voice modelled on his; the account had about 210,000 followers, videos averaged 1.47 million views, and his side says the poster earned 500,000 to 750,000 yen a month from TikTok's view-based payments. TikTok's operator said the voice was a generic male voice that the poster said came from AI trained on a friend's voice. The poster deleted the account in May 2026. On 30 September 2026 the court held, as a general principle, that a person's voice is a symbol of personality like a likeness and that using a performer's voice without permission solely to exploit its power to attract customers infringes the right of publicity, the first such ruling in Japan. It dismissed the claim because the videos were already gone and TikTok's operator had no remaining duty to delete them, and it did not decide whether these videos infringed his rights (Nikkei; Asahi Shimbun; TV Asahi). His lawyer said they did not plan to appeal.","incidentDate":"2024-07-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-09-30","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-05-23","aiSystem":"An unidentified generative-AI voice tool used by an anonymous TikTok account to produce narration (the plaintiff alleges the voice imitates his; the poster reportedly said the model was trained on a friend's voice); videos distributed on TikTok","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Mr Tsuda alleges that an anonymous poster used a generative-AI imitation of his voice, without permission, to narrate at least 188 monetised TikTok videos that viewers took to be his, infringing his rights over his voice; TikTok disputes that the voice is his, and the court dismissed his deletion claim without deciding infringement because the videos had been deleted (Nikkei, Asahi and Jiji Press).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the plaintiff Kenjiro Tsuda, whose voice is alleged to have been imitated (Nikkei; Asahi; Jiji Press). Followers and viewers are not counted. Other voice actors described in the Jiji industry feature are separate accounts and are not counted. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"JP","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_dismissed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUD262B00W6A920C2000000/","primarySourceLabel":"Nikkei, 30 September 2026: 声にもパブリシティー権、初の司法判断　津田健次郎さんの請求は棄却","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-28T03:31:37.82387+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-10T03:20:05.706932+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["voice-cloning","voice-actor","publicity-rights","tiktok","japan","tokyo-district-court","lawsuit","depicted-or-impersonated","court-ruling"]},{"id":"2024-york-county-sc-flock-alpr-misread-plate-gunpoint-stop-melvin-lawsuit","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'was stopped by a York County sheriff’s deputy on Feb. 14, 2024, while pulling into his apartment complex near Lake Wylie.'; 'received an alert from a Flock license plate reader that a stolen, dark-colored BMW sedan was traveling in the area, according to the filing.'; 'ordering him to kneel on the ground with his hands over his head for over five minutes, the filing said.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'approached Melvin with his firearm drawn and ordered him out of the car, according to the lawsuit.'; 'remained there for roughly five minutes while deputies checked his information.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'ordered him out of his car at gunpoint.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"According to the lawsuit, on 14 February 2024 a York County deputy who had received a Flock license-plate-reader alert for a stolen dark-coloured BMW approached Melvin's black BMW with his gun drawn as Melvin pulled into his apartment complex near Lake Wylie, and made him kneel with his hands over his head for more than five minutes until deputies established that the car was not stolen.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's lawsuit as reported; the Post and Courier says he was handcuffed, the Herald and Military.com describe him kneeling. The complaint itself was not read."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The Flock camera incorrectly identified the first letter of the license plate.'; 'tinted license plate cover was illegal, and obscured the camera, according to the filing.'; 'correctly identified Melvin’s plate 13 times that month prior to the traffic stop, according to the filing.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The stop resulted from erroneous information associated with a Flock alert,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Flock camera misread the first letter of Melvin's South Carolina plate; the sheriff's office blamed an illegal tinted plate cover and its internal-affairs report says the stop resulted from erroneous information associated with a Flock alert, while an internal email cited in the filing says the cameras had read his plate correctly 13 times that month.","causal_attribution":"Filing and internal records as reported; the sheriff's office and the plaintiff disagree about why the plate was misread."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'said he suffered trauma and “emotional distress” because of the traffic stop.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'feared for his life and reasonably believed he could be shot.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Melvin says he suffered trauma and emotional distress and feared he could be shot.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiff's own account in the complaint."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'NOTICE OF REMOVAL from York County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2026CP4602329.'; 'Melvin v. York County Sheriff's Office, 0:26-cv-03474'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The defendants removed Melvin's suit from the York County Court of Common Pleas (case 2026CP4602329) to the US District Court for the District of South Carolina, where it is docketed as Melvin v. York County Sheriff's Office, 0:26-cv-03474.","causal_attribution":"Docket entry."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The York County Sheriff’s Office denies violating Melvin’s rights and has asked a federal judge to dismiss the case.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'The sheriff’s office found in November 2024 that'; 'actions were “reasonable” after Melvin filed an internal affairs complaint against them.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The sheriff's office denies violating Melvin's rights and has asked the federal court to dismiss the case; a November 2024 internal-affairs review found the deputy's actions reasonable.","causal_attribution":"Defendants' position as reported; no dismissal motion appears among the docket entries read (through 8 September 2026)."}],"effects":[{"label":"held at gunpoint and made to kneel for more than five minutes after a misread license-plate-reader alert flagged his car as stolen","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"says the stop caused him trauma and emotional distress","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.heraldonline.com/news/local/crime/article316428323.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-09-28 from the Internet Archive capture of 25 September 2026 (The Herald, Rock Hill, 9 July 2026); the live site timed out. Reports from the lawsuit and attached documents; includes a Flock statement.","independence_group":"melvin-lawsuit-filings"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.postandcourier.com/york-county/news/flock-license-plate-readers-york-county-cameras/article_21d1fac9-69b0-4706-93ab-f0e43c0ede6e.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-28 (Post and Courier, 19 August 2026). Draws on the lawsuit and quotes the internal-affairs report; does not name the plaintiff.","independence_group":"melvin-lawsuit-filings"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.military.com/iraq-war-veteran-says-flock-camera-error-led-to-police-gunpoint-stop","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-28 (Military.com, 16 September 2026). Relays the lawsuit and the Herald's reporting on the dismissal request.","independence_group":"melvin-lawsuit-filings"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74652791/melvin-v-york-county-sheriffs-office/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-28: CourtListener docket for Melvin v. York County Sheriff's Office, 0:26-cv-03474 (D.S.C.); entries through 8 September 2026. No filed documents were available to read.","independence_group":"dsc-docket-0-26-cv-03474"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["Whether Melvin was handcuffed as well as held kneeling (the Post and Courier and the Herald differ).","Whether the misread was caused by the tinted plate cover, the camera or both, and why the alert was not visually confirmed before the weapon was drawn.","The outcome of the dismissal request and of the suit."],"geography":{"basis":"The stop took place at Melvin's apartment complex near Lake Wylie, York County, South Carolina (Herald); the suit was filed in the York County Court of Common Pleas and removed to the US District Court for the District of South Carolina (docket).","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a contextual case consistent with the existing Flock rows: an automated plate reader misread a man's plate and flagged his car as stolen, and deputies held him at gunpoint. The account rests on his lawsuit and the sheriff's own records as reported, with the federal docket confirming the case. He is named as the plaintiff in his own suit.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-28"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"According to the filing reported by the Herald, the deputy acted on a Flock license-plate-reader alert for a stolen BMW; the camera misread the first letter of Melvin's plate, and the sheriff's internal-affairs report says the stop 'resulted from erroneous information associated with a Flock alert' (Post and Courier). The misread plate matched against a hotlist is the automated system's claim about his car. The sheriff's office attributes the misread to an illegal tinted plate cover; an internal email says the cameras had read his plate correctly 13 times that month. The decision to draw a weapon was the deputy's.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["made_claim_about"]},"name":"York County, South Carolina: Iraq War veteran Steven Melvin says deputies held him at gunpoint and made him kneel for more than five minutes outside his Lake Wylie apartment complex in February 2024 after a Flock license-plate reader misread his plate and flagged his BMW as stolen; he sued in June 2026","summary":"According to a lawsuit filed on 29 June 2026 and reported by The Herald (Rock Hill), a York County sheriff's deputy stopped Steven Melvin, 42, on 14 February 2024 as he pulled into his apartment complex near Lake Wylie, after receiving a Flock license-plate-reader alert that a stolen dark-coloured BMW sedan was in the area. The deputy approached Melvin's black BMW with his gun drawn and aimed at him and made him kneel with his hands over his head for more than five minutes; after calling for backup and checking his information, the deputy determined the car was not stolen. The camera had read the first letter of his South Carolina tag incorrectly, matching a stolen BMW one letter off. A sheriff's internal-affairs review in November 2024 found the deputy's actions reasonable and blamed an illegally tinted plate cover, for which Melvin received a verbal warning; an email cited in the filing says the cameras had read his plate correctly 13 times that month. Melvin says the stop caused him trauma and emotional distress. The sheriff's office removed the case to federal court in August 2026 and denies violating his rights.","incidentDate":"2024-02-14","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-07-09","aiSystem":"Flock Safety automated license-plate reader (a camera the Herald describes as AI-enabled) that read passing plates, matched Melvin's misread plate against a stolen-vehicle hotlist record and sent an alert to the deputy","aiProduct":"Flock Safety license plate readers","aiCompany":"Flock Safety","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["loss_of_liberty","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Melvin says he was held at gunpoint and detained kneeling for more than five minutes after a misread Flock alert and suffered trauma and emotional distress (his complaint as reported by the Herald and Military.com); the sheriff's office disputes that the stop was unlawful.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, Steven Melvin, detained at gunpoint (lawsuit via the Herald, Military.com, Post and Courier). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-SC","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.heraldonline.com/news/local/crime/article316428323.html","primarySourceLabel":"The Herald (Rock Hill), 9 July 2026: York man was held at gunpoint over incorrect Flock hit. Sheriff blames illegal tag cover","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-28T03:31:25.729021+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:16:54.634302+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["flock","alpr","license-plate-reader","wrongful-stop","gunpoint","south-carolina","york-county","justice","made-claim-about","lawsuit"]},{"id":"2026-dillon-faces-wrongful-arrest-florida","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'took pictures of the screen with his cell phone… low resolution… partially shadowed and off-axis'; '93 percent confidence'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Warrant based on the FR hit + 'a statement from a restaurant employee who picked his photo out of a lineup'; 'police called Dillon in 2023, he denied involvement citing skin-cancer scars'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The warrant rested on a 93%-confidence FACES result obtained from low-resolution cell-phone photos of the restaurant's surveillance screen (partially shadowed, off-axis) plus a restaurant employee's photo-lineup identification; police had called Dillon in 2023 and he denied involvement, citing skin-cancer scars.","causal_attribution":"The evidentiary basis is the complaint's account, carried by two chains; whether '93%' was system-generated or an investigator's characterization is unverified (the suit says the system 'spit out' his photo as a 'possible match')."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'arrested Aug 2024 in Fort Myers'; 'more than two months later, prosecutors dropped the charges'; 'it took an entire year… to take down his mug shot and expunge the arrest'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Arrest bodycam 'outside his San Carlos Park home' via Gulf Coast affiliate; the Dillon interview ('I don't wish this on my worst enemy').","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'charges… dropped… in October 2024'; 1 night jail, bonded out pledging his truck's title.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Dillon was arrested at his San Carlos Park home in August 2024, spent one night in jail and bonded out pledging his truck's title; prosecutors dropped the charges in October 2024 after work-alibi evidence; the arrest took about a year to expunge, with his mugshot lingering online.","causal_attribution":"The custody and expungement timeline is consistent across three chains."},{"id":"c3","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'suit in M.D. Fla. vs. city of Jacksonville Beach + officers/officials incl. Sheriff T.K. Waters'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Suit 'includes the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, which oversees the use of the AI facial recognition technology across Florida'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"ACLU attorney Nathan Wessler interview; defendants: Jacksonville Beach PD + Jacksonville and Pinellas County sheriffs' offices.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The ACLU filed a federal lawsuit in the week of 8 June 2026 in the Middle District of Florida against the city of Jacksonville Beach, Jacksonville Sheriff T.K. Waters and the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, seeking damages and policy safeguards.","causal_attribution":"The suit's existence and parties are carried by three chains; the exact filing date within the week of 8 June is not pinned in the inspected sources."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"PCSO response passages ('patently false'; 'never \"matches\"'; 'rests solely with any officer').","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Pinellas County Sheriff's Office responded that a training-failure claim 'is patently false', that 'facial recognition results are never \"matches\"', and that liability 'rests solely with any officer who did so'.","causal_attribution":"The agency's position is quoted directly and preserved as contrary evidence."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'one of at least 14 people arrested since 2019'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'one of 15 known people'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The ACLU counts Dillon as at least the 14th known person wrongfully arrested since 2019 from police reliance on facial recognition (Reason, 11 June); a later WUSF attorney interview puts the count at 15 known.","causal_attribution":"The advocacy count is attributed to the ACLU; the two figures are recorded as stated on their dates."}],"effects":[{"label":"wrongful felony arrest on a 93% facial-recognition hit, with a year-long expungement fight","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://reason.com/2026/06/11/aclu-sues-after-facial-recognition-falsely-identifies-florida-man-as-a-child-abductor/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (11 Jun 2026, Joe Lancaster).","independence_group":"reason"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://abcnews.com/GMA/News/man-sues-law-enforcement-alleging-ai-facial-recognition/story?id=133810835","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (12 Jun 2026, Hipos & Yu).","independence_group":"abc-news"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.wusf.org/courts-law/2026-06-18/ai-facial-recognition-tool-led-to-florida-man-wrongful-arrest-lawsuit","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (18 Jun 2026, Lyden/Peddie).","independence_group":"wusf"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["The exact filing date within the week of 8 June 2026 and the docket number are not pinned in the inspected sources.","Whether the '93%' figure was system-generated or an investigator's characterization is unverified.","The lineup procedure's details (who administered it and how) are only partly reported.","The expungement's completion date is given only as 'about a year' after the arrest.","The actual perpetrator of the 2023 luring attempt is not reported as identified."],"geography":{"basis":"Event: the warrant (Jacksonville Beach) and the arrest (San Carlos Park / Fort Myers), Florida. Affected person: Dillon, Florida. Court: the felony charge (dropped) and the federal suit in the Middle District of Florida.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional automated-decision case (made_decision_about / made_claim_about): a facial-recognition hit treated as warrant-grade identification, documented by three independent chains including the ACLU's own attorney and the vendor agency's response. Dillon spoke publicly; the PCSO denial is preserved as contrary evidence.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The warrant rested on the FACES 93%-confidence result plus a lineup identification, per the complaint as carried by Reason and WUSF; the vendor (Pinellas County Sheriff's Office FACES) is confirmed by WUSF, and the PCSO's own response acknowledges its technology's role while rejecting liability.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["made_decision_about","made_claim_about"]},"name":"Florida: 93% facial-recognition hit led to Robert Dillon's arrest as an attempted child abductor; charges dropped, ACLU suit filed","summary":"In August 2024, Robert Dillon, a 52-year-old self-employed commercial crabber from the Fort Myers area, was arrested at his San Carlos Park home on a third-degree felony warrant for the attempted luring of a child at a Jacksonville Beach McDonald's in November 2023 — a crime he had no part in. The warrant rested on a 93%-confidence result from FACES, the Face Analysis Comparison and Examination System maintained by the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, run against low-resolution cell-phone photos of a surveillance screen, plus a restaurant employee's photo-lineup identification. Dillon spent a night in jail and bonded out against his truck's title; prosecutors dropped the charges in October 2024 after work-alibi evidence, but it took about a year to expunge the arrest and remove his mugshot. In June 2026 the ACLU filed a federal lawsuit (M.D. Fla.) against Jacksonville Beach, the Jacksonville sheriff and the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, calling Dillon one of at least 14 known wrongful arrests from police reliance on facial recognition since 2019.","incidentDate":"2024-08-01","incidentEndDate":"2024-10-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-06-11","aiSystem":"FACES (Face Analysis Comparison and Examination System), Pinellas County Sheriff's Office","aiProduct":"FACES facial recognition","aiCompany":"Pinellas County Sheriff's Office (FACES centralized database)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm","reputational_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Arrested at home on a child-abduction-class felony from a 93% facial-recognition hit on grainy screen photos; a night in jail, two months to clear the charge, and about a year to expunge the record and remove the mugshot.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One documented harmed person: Dillon, the misidentified arrestee (three independent chains). The child in the underlying luring attempt is a victim of the actual perpetrator, not of the misidentification, and is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://reason.com/2026/06/11/aclu-sues-after-facial-recognition-falsely-identifies-florida-man-as-a-child-abductor/","primarySourceLabel":"Reason (11 Jun 2026, Joe Lancaster) — complaint-based account: the screen photos, the 93% hit, the arrest, the expungement, the suit","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-15T10:27:54.71948+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:35.503237+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["made-decision-about","made-claim-about","facial-recognition","wrongful-arrest","justice","florida","aclu"]},{"id":"2026-lorenzano-nunez-facial-recognition-wrongful-arrest","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'investigators ran Rosado's old Arizona MVD photo through facial recognition databases operated by the Arizona Department of Public Safety and the FBI. They received 250 possible matches and zeroed in on Lorenzano Nunez'; the press-release/video passage (victim's son flown in, his handcuffs used).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Javier Lorenzano-Nunez was arrested in October 2024'; the son's account of the arrest period.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Lorenzano Nunez was arrested in October 2024 for the 1998 murder of Sarah Carr after investigators ran the old suspect's MVD photo through facial recognition databases (Arizona DPS and FBI), received 250 possible matches and zeroed in on him; Phoenix police publicized the arrest with a press release and a special video featuring the victim's son.","causal_attribution":"The arrest and the FR role are carried by both chains; the lawsuit's characterization of FR as 'the key evidence' is attributed to the filing and court records."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'who spent nearly a year in jail after being arrested for a 1998 Phoenix murder'; 'All charges were quietly dismissed less than a year later after forensic evidence, including DNA and fingerprints, excluded him, records show.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'charges dropped against him, without prejudice, in August 2025'; MCAO: 'additional evidence that put into question his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"He spent nearly a year in jail; charges were dismissed without prejudice in August 2025 after forensic evidence, including DNA and fingerprints, excluded him, and the county attorney said additional evidence put his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.","causal_attribution":"The dismissal and its stated reason are official-account material carried by both chains; 'without prejudice' leaves refiling open."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The 2007 Puerto Rico passage ('They did not act on it', per attorney Ortega) and the 2017-analysis passage ('The results excluded Lorenzano Nunez on 2 latent prints and were inconclusive on 2 others... seven years before').","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The lawsuit alleges Phoenix police ignored a 2007 Puerto Rico Police lead reporting a man named Gilbert Noel Sanchez Rosado in custody with the same date of birth and social security number as the suspect, and that Phoenix's own 2017 fingerprint analysis had excluded Lorenzano Nunez on two latent prints (inconclusive on two) seven years before his arrest.","causal_attribution":"These are the lawsuit's allegations carried by one chain from court records; the county attorney declined to comment. A court has not ruled on them."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"MCAO statement passages ('pointed toward...', 'valuable investigative tool'); the notice-of-claim critique ('merely identified... as a possible lead').","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Maricopa County Attorney's Office said the evidence police provided when the case was submitted 'pointed toward Javier Lorenzano-Nunez' and called facial recognition software a 'valuable investigative tool'; the notice of claim counters that facial recognition merely identified him as a possible lead.","causal_attribution":"Both institutional positions are quoted directly; the dispute over the weight given to the FR match is the case's core and is preserved."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The arrest-video passage (Miller flown in, his handcuffs used, interviewed for the city's special video).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'It's not the outcome we wanted, but it's not over with'; 'I wholeheartedly believe in the investigators'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The victim's son, Garrett Miller, himself a police officer, was flown in for the arrest and his handcuffs were used; after the dismissal he said the outcome was heart-wrenching but that he believes in the investigators and that 'it's not over with'.","causal_attribution":"Contrary context preserved per the charter: the family's trust in the investigation is recorded alongside the wrongful-arrest account."}],"effects":[{"label":"nearly a year wrongfully jailed on a facial-recognition-driven arrest, publicized by police before forensic exclusion","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.abc15.com/news/local-news/investigations/man-falsely-arrested-with-facial-recognition-for-cold-case-murder-sues-phoenix-pd-mcao","kind":"news_report_court_records","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2026-07-02T14:46-07:00; 23 paragraphs).","independence_group":"abc15"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/sarah-jane-carrs-family-vows-keep-believing-justice-after-murder-charges-dismissed","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2026-06-01T21:20-07:00; 20 paragraphs).","independence_group":"fox10"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["The specific facial-recognition vendor/system is not named in the inspected reporting.","Details from ABC15's earlier 'About Face' investigation (including any grand-jury or foreign-custody particulars) were not re-verified in this pass and are not claimed.","The federal suit's filing date and docket number are not stated in the inspected sources (reported as filed by 2 July 2026).","Whether he was held continuously from October 2024 to August 2025 ('nearly a year in jail' per ABC15) is reported without a custody breakdown.","The 1998 murder of Sarah Carr remains unsolved; the 2007 Puerto Rico lead's current status is unknown."],"geography":{"basis":"Event: Phoenix, Arizona (arrest, detention, dismissal). Affected person: Lorenzano Nunez. Court: Maricopa County proceedings, then the federal suit; Puerto Rico's 2007 contact was a lead, not a proceeding.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional automated-decision case (made_decision_about / made_claim_about): a facial-recognition hit treated as key arrest evidence, with nearly a year of wrongful detention, documented through court-records reporting by two independent local chains. The county attorney's defense and the victim family's trust are preserved as contrary context.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The lawsuit and court records, per ABC15, make facial recognition 'the key evidence used to arrest'; the county attorney calls it a 'valuable investigative tool' while the notice of claim says it merely identified a possible lead. The specific vendor system is not named in the inspected reporting.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["made_decision_about","made_claim_about"]},"name":"Phoenix lawsuit alleges a facial-recognition lead contributed to a wrongful arrest","summary":"Javier Lorenzano Nunez was arrested in October 2024 for the 1998 murder of Sarah Carr after investigators ran the old suspect's MVD photo through facial recognition databases, got 250 possible matches and zeroed in on him — with Phoenix police publicizing the arrest in a press release and a special video. Charges were dismissed without prejudice in August 2025 after forensic evidence, including DNA and fingerprints, excluded him. His lawsuit alleges Phoenix police knew from a 2017 fingerprint analysis that his prints did not match, and ignored a 2007 Puerto Rico lead on the original suspect with the same name, date of birth and social security number. He spent nearly a year in jail. The federal suit against the Phoenix Police Department and the Maricopa County Attorney's Office alleges gross negligence, false arrest, false imprisonment and defamation.","incidentDate":"2024-10-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-08-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-06-01","aiSystem":"Facial recognition systems operated by the Arizona Department of Public Safety and the FBI","aiProduct":"Unidentified facial recognition system","aiCompany":"Arizona DPS / FBI (systems not named in inspected reporting)","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm","loss_of_autonomy","reputational_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Nearly a year wrongfully jailed on a facial-recognition-driven cold-case arrest that police publicized with a video and the victim's son's handcuffs, ending only when DNA and fingerprint evidence excluded him; he now alleges false arrest, false imprisonment and defamation.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One documented harmed person: Lorenzano Nunez, the subject of the wrongful arrest (court records and two news chains). The victim's family, whose hopes were raised and dashed, is recorded in the narrative but not counted as harmed persons under the counting rules.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.abc15.com/news/local-news/investigations/man-falsely-arrested-with-facial-recognition-for-cold-case-murder-sues-phoenix-pd-mcao","primarySourceLabel":"ABC15 Arizona (2 Jul 2026) — the federal suit, court records, the 2017 fingerprint exclusion and the 2007 Puerto Rico lead","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-15T09:35:16.968902+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T11:09:04.547902+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["made-decision-about","made-claim-about","facial-recognition","wrongful-arrest","justice","arizona"]},{"id":"2026-newby-adelphi-ai-detector-vacated","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'In November 2024, Newby submitted a paper on Christianity and Islam'; 'Oelze gave the paper a grade of zero, according to court filings, in part because he thought it was AI-generated'; 'According to the lawsuit, Adelphi relied in part on AI detection software'; 'Turnitin's AI detector marked the essay as fully AI-written, but Newby ran it through two other detectors that said it was written by a human, court records show'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Adelphi University says an AI detection software flagged 19-year-old Orion Newby's work and claims the paper was \"too advanced\" for the first-year student'; 'That paper earned him a zero'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In November 2024 Newby submitted a paper on Christianity and Islam for the fall 2024 World Civilizations 1 class; the professor graded it zero in part because he thought it was AI-generated, and Adelphi, per the lawsuit, relied in part on AI-detection software — court records show Turnitin's detector marked the essay as fully AI-written while two other detectors scored it human.","causal_attribution":"The detector results and the lawsuit's contents are attributed to court filings as carried by Newsday; the professor's suspicion is attributed to court filings and ABC7."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'University officials ordered Newby to attend a plagiarism workshop — which, while considered a \"nondisciplinary\" punishment, could have resulted in suspension or expulsion if he was found to have committed a second offense'; 'The university's denial of Newby's appeal left the family \"no choice\" but to sue'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Adelphi told him he had to take an anti-plagiarism course, and until he did, he couldn't enroll in other classes. That's when his family sued.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Newby was ordered to attend a plagiarism workshop — a 'nondisciplinary' punishment that could have led to suspension or expulsion on a second offense — was told he could not enroll in other classes until he complied, and his appeal was denied; the family sued in October 2025.","causal_attribution":"Both chains independently carry the workshop order and the enrollment block (Newsday from the ruling stage, ABC7 from the filing stage)."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'state Supreme Court Judge Randy Sue Marber in Nassau County wrote on Jan. 28. The school must expunge his record, the judge ruled'; 'were \"without valid basis and devoid of reason\"'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Inside Higher Ed's relay describes a 'federal judge' — erroneous; Judge Marber's state Supreme Court decision controls.","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On 28 January 2026, New York State Supreme Court Judge Randy Sue Marber in Nassau County ruled that Adelphi's finding and its denial of his appeal were 'without valid basis and devoid of reason' and ordered the school to expunge his record.","causal_attribution":"The ruling is documented by Newsday's report quoting the decision; the IHE forum error is recorded explicitly. The decision text itself was not fetched (Newsday's account is the inspected record)."},{"id":"c4","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'treated since he was about 2 years old for learning and neurological disabilities that include language and auditory processing disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder'; 'He had worked on it with a tutor from Bridges to Adelphi, the university's $5,000-a-semester program'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Newby has learning differences... issues specifically with language processing. At Adelphi, he's in a special program with extra support'; 'I told him I worked 15 to 20 hours with tutors'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Newby has been treated since about age two for learning and neurological disabilities — language and auditory processing disorders and ADHD — and wrote the paper with a tutor from Bridges to Adelphi, the university's own $5,000-a-semester disability-support program, working 15-20 hours with tutors.","causal_attribution":"The disability and support details come from his mother's and his own accounts, carried by both chains."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The family has spent six figures on legal costs, she said'; Lesko passages ('bellwether example'; 'I can't tell you how many parents have reached out to us with similar issues').","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The family spent six figures on legal costs; attorney Mark Lesko called the ruling a 'bellwether example' and said many parents had contacted him with similar issues.","causal_attribution":"The mother's and the attorney's accounts; the 'many parents' figure is unquantified and no other persons are counted."}],"effects":[{"label":"false AI-plagiarism accusation with academic and financial consequences until a court ordered expungement","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"recovery: court cleared his record; he continues at Adelphi as a second-year history major","claim_id":"c3","direction":"positive"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.newsday.com/long-island/education/adelphi-university-ai-plagiarism-lawsuit-oh07enyz","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2026-02-09T10:00Z; 48 paragraphs).","independence_group":"newsday"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://abc7ny.com/post/adelphi-student-long-island-sues-university-allegations-he-used-ai-write-essay/17980409/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2025-10-10T20:54Z).","independence_group":"abc7"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2026/02/11/adelphi-student-wins-ai-plagiarism-lawsuit","kind":"trade_press_relaying_newsday","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (2026-02-11). Relays Newsday; its 'federal judge' phrase is erroneous — Judge Marber sits in the state Supreme Court, and the claim records the discrepancy.","independence_group":"newsday"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["education","justice","accessibility"],"unknowns":["The decision text was not fetched; the ruling is recorded through Newsday's account quoting the judge.","The similarity scores Turnitin returned and the university's full decision letter are not public in the inspected sources.","Whether Adelphi changed its AI-detection or appeals policies afterward is not reported.","The first-person Times account (28 Aug 2026) is paywalled and was not inspected; his later reflections are therefore not claimed.","The workshop's completion status after the ruling (moot after expungement) is not reported."],"geography":{"basis":"Event: Adelphi University, Garden City, New York. Affected person: Newby, a student there living in Lido Beach, NY. Court: New York State Supreme Court, Nassau County.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional automated-decision case (made_decision_about / made_claim_about): a detector-driven false accusation with court-vacated sanctions. Newby and his parents spoke publicly; his disability is recorded because it is central to the case's facts (the university's own support program produced the writing process the detector misread), not as a label.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The lawsuit records that Adelphi relied in part on AI-detection software; court records show Turnitin's detector marked the essay as fully AI-written while two other detectors scored it human (Newsday). The university's process, not the tool alone, produced the sanction — recorded in the harm mechanism.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["made_decision_about","made_claim_about"]},"name":"Adelphi accused Orion Newby of AI plagiarism after a detector flagged his paper; a Nassau County judge ordered the finding expunged","summary":"Orion Newby, an Adelphi University first-year student with language and auditory processing disabilities, received a zero in November 2024 on a World Civilizations paper after the professor suspected it was AI-generated and the university relied in part on AI-detection software; he was ordered to attend a plagiarism workshop and his appeal was denied, leaving him one finding from suspension or expulsion. Newby — who had written the paper with 15-20 hours of tutor support through the university's own disability program — said the detectors flagged his citations, and two other detectors scored the paper as human. After the family sued, New York State Supreme Court Judge Randy Sue Marber in Nassau County ruled on 28 January 2026 that Adelphi's finding and its denial of his appeal were 'without valid basis and devoid of reason' and ordered his record expunged. The family spent six figures on legal costs.","incidentDate":"2024-11-01","incidentEndDate":"2026-01-28","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2025-10-10","aiSystem":"Turnitin AI-detection software (and the university's reliance on it)","aiProduct":"Turnitin AI-text detector","aiCompany":"Turnitin","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["educational_harm","financial_loss","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A false AI-plagiarism finding brought a zero, a plagiarism-workshop order one step from suspension, sleepless nights, and a year-plus fight costing six figures to clear his record — despite two other detectors scoring the paper human and the writing help coming from the university's own disability program.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One documented harmed person: Newby, the subject of the detector-driven accusation (court ruling and Newsday/ABC7 reporting). Other students mentioned by his attorney ('many parents have reached out') are unquantified and not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.newsday.com/long-island/education/adelphi-university-ai-plagiarism-lawsuit-oh07enyz","primarySourceLabel":"Newsday (9 Feb 2026) — the ruling, the judge's words, the family and attorney accounts, the disability and Bridges program detail","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-15T09:31:23.493757+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:46.697576+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["made-decision-about","made-claim-about","ai-detector","turnitin","education","disability","court-win","new-york"]},{"id":"2026-ad-v-character-technologies","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Case 3:26-cv-08400-LJC Document 1 Filed 08/13/26; A.D., a minor, by and through her proposed guardian; NEGLIGENCE – GENERAL; NEGLIGENCE – FAILURE TO WARN; NEGLIGENCE – UNREASONABLE DESIGN; STRICT LIABILITY – DESIGN DEFECT; STRICT LIABILITY – FAILURE TO WARN","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"A.D. v. Character Technologies, Inc., 3:26-cv-08400, (N.D. Cal.); Date Filed: Aug. 13, 2026","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"The Character.AI lawsuit was filed on Thursday, August 13, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"Gibbs Mura filed a lawsuit on August 13, 2026","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"A complaint by A.D., a minor, through her proposed guardian ad litem K.H., against Character Technologies, Inc., Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwardana, Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. was filed on 13 August 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (No. 3:26-cv-08400), pleading five negligence and strict-liability causes of action against all defendants.","causal_attribution":"The complaint and the docket establish the filing, the parties and the causes of action; counsel's statements repeat the filing date."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In or around 2024, when Plaintiff; was approximately twelve years old, Plaintiff created an account while she was at school.; Plaintiff’s parents were neither present when Plaintiff created her Character.AI account,; Character.AI never asked Plaintiff to verify her age.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint says the girl created a Character.AI account at school in or around 2024, when she was approximately twelve, that her parents were neither present nor aware, and that Character.AI never asked her to verify her age.","causal_attribution":"Allegations in the complaint; one source."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"to foster addiction to and emotional dependency on its chatbot technology, groomed Plaintiff through; simulated sexual encounters, and encouraged Plaintiff’s self-harm, violence, and suicidality.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Character.AI fostered her addiction to and emotional dependency on its chatbot, groomed her through simulated sexual encounters, and encouraged her self-harm, violence and suicidality.","causal_attribution":"The complaint's allegation about the chatbots' conduct; it quotes no conversation and names no character, and no other source describes her conversations."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Plaintiff has suffered profound physical, emotional, and psychological harm from the; struggle with depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation, among other injuries.; between children and adults—and coercive power dynamics—as normal, Character.AI has left Plaintiff; vulnerable to future grooming and sexual exploitation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint says she has suffered profound physical, emotional and psychological harm and continues to struggle with depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation, and alleges that being conditioned to view sexual interactions between children and adults as normal has left her vulnerable to future grooming.","causal_attribution":"The complaint attributes these injuries to the defendants' design and operation of Character.AI; no medical record or independent account was inspected."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines; Order on Ex Parte Application AND Order on Ex Parte Application; Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; Stipulation without Proposed Order; Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; Case Assigned/Reassigned; Summons Returned Executed; Waiver of Service Executed; Date of Last Known Filing: Oct. 22, 2026","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"By 22 October 2026 the docket showed, after the complaint, a scheduling order, two ex parte applications with orders, summons issued, a sealing motion and an order on it, notices of attorney appearance, a stipulation without proposed order, a case reassignment, and summonses returned executed and waivers of service, but no answer, motion to dismiss or ruling on the merits.","causal_attribution":"Docket entry titles; their texts were not read."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Character.AI filed a petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 12.; In a declaration filed as part of the bankruptcy, Character.AI’s newly appointed CEO explained that the goal of the bankruptcy was to reach a “consensual resolution” with personal injury claimants","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"WIRED reports that Character.AI filed a petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy on 12 October 2026, and that its newly appointed chief executive's declaration describes the goal as a consensual resolution with personal injury claimants and the states investigating the company.","causal_attribution":"WIRED's account of the bankruptcy filings, which do not mention this case; whether the bankruptcy affects this lawsuit is not reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"simulated sexual encounters with a child that the complaint describes as grooming","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"continuing depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation, as alleged","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.476159/gov.uscourts.cand.476159.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live PDF, HTTP 200, 2.1 MB; bodies/lr-adv-complaint.pdf/.txt via pdftotext). Caption: Case 3:26-cv-08400-LJC, Document 1, filed 08/13/26, 77 pages. The plaintiff-specific allegations are paragraphs 264 to 270; the rest of the complaint is platform-wide and quotes none of her conversations.","independence_group":"ad-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74645761/ad-v-character-technologies-inc/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-adv-docket.html/.txt), last updated 22 Oct 2026. Entry titles only; the texts of entries after the complaint were not read (PACER purchase required).","independence_group":"cand-docket"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260813331103/en/Character.AI-Charged-With-Teen-Mental-Health-Harm-in-Lawsuit-by-Gibbs-Mura-A-Law-Group","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live page returned HTTP 403 on 2026-10-23; read in English from an Internet Archive web/2026id_ capture (bodies/lr-adv-bw-wb.html/.txt). Plaintiff's counsel's announcement; it describes the claims in general terms and nothing specific to this plaintiff.","independence_group":"gibbs-mura-counsel"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.classlawgroup.com/character-ai-lawsuits","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-adv-classlaw.html/.txt). Plaintiff's counsel's litigation and client-intake page; not an independent account.","independence_group":"gibbs-mura-counsel"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/disney-asked-characterai-to-go-bankrupt-for-a-get-out-of-lawsuits-card/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-adv-wired.html/.txt). Reports the Character.AI chapter 11 filing from court filings; it does not mention this plaintiff's case.","independence_group":"wired-bankruptcy"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["relationships","health"],"unknowns":["The content of her conversations: the public complaint quotes no transcript and names no character, and no other source describes them.","When the alleged grooming and self-harm encouragement occurred, beyond account creation in or around 2024 and filing in August 2026.","Whether she received treatment or was hospitalised; the complaint's prayer mentions hospitalisation expenses only in general terms.","Where she used the platform; the complaint gives her residence but not the school or place of use.","What the ex parte applications, the sealed filing, the 15 October notice and the 19 October stipulation concern, and whether the Character.AI bankruptcy stays the case against it.","Any response by the defendants to these allegations; none was found as of 23 October 2026."],"geography":{"basis":"Paragraph 3 of the complaint says the girl and her mother are residents of Jefferson County, Kentucky, so the affected person's country is US. Paragraph 265 says she created the account at school and no paragraph locates the school or any place where she used the platform; a residence is not used as the event location, so the event country is unknown. The complaint caption, the docket and counsel's release place the case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, so the court country is US. Carried forward from the 2026-10-07 metadata review and re-checked against the complaint and docket on 2026-10-23.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). The complaint alleges that Character.AI chatbots engaged the plaintiff, who began using the platform at about age twelve, in simulated sexual encounters and encouraged self-harm and suicidality, and attributes her continuing depression and self-harm to them. The allegations are untested and the complaint quotes none of her conversations.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-23"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges that Character.AI's chatbots engaged the girl, who began using the platform at about age twelve, in simulated sexual encounters that it calls grooming and encouraged her self-harm, violence and suicidality, and it attributes her continuing depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation to that conduct and to the dependency the chatbots fostered. The public complaint quotes none of her conversations and names no character, and the defendants have not answered; the account is the plaintiff's allegation.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Lawsuit for a girl who began using Character.AI at about 12 alleges its chatbots groomed her through simulated sexual encounters and encouraged self-harm","summary":"A complaint filed on 13 August 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by a girl, through her mother, says she created a Character.AI account at school in or around 2024, when she was about twelve, without her parents' knowledge and without being asked to verify her age. It alleges that Character.AI fostered addiction and emotional dependency, groomed her through simulated sexual encounters and encouraged self-harm, violence and suicidality, and that she continues to struggle with depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation. The public complaint quotes none of her conversations. Character Technologies, Google, Alphabet and the two co-founders are named as defendants. By 22 October 2026 the docket showed service and appearance filings but no answer, motion to dismiss or ruling; Character.AI filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on 12 October 2026, according to WIRED. The allegations are untested.","incidentDate":"2024-01-01","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-08-13","aiSystem":"Character.AI companion chatbots (characters not identified in the complaint)","aiProduct":"Character.AI","aiCompany":"Character Technologies Inc.","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["self_injury","psychological_distress","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The complaint alleges that Character.AI chatbots groomed the girl through simulated sexual encounters, encouraged self-harm and suicidality, and left her with continuing depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint describes one plaintiff, the girl who used Character.AI. Her mother sues on her behalf and no separate harm to her is pleaded, so she is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"companion","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.476159/gov.uscourts.cand.476159.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"A.D. v. Character Technologies complaint, N.D. Cal. No. 3:26-cv-08400, filed 13 Aug 2026 (CourtListener RECAP)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-08-25T19:09:14.721121+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-23T03:02:21.21544+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["lawsuit","character-ai","google","minor","self-harm","sexual-content","us"]},{"id":"2025-es-v-character-technologies","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'T.S. is a minor and lives in Colorado.'; 'In August 2024, T.S. told E.S. about an AI app that her friend was using called Character AI.'; 'She said no.'; 'T.S. had figured out how to create a new profile on the shared laptop; one that mimicked the administrator profile but had no password protection.'; 'Through this new profile T.S. was able to obtain access to C.AI.'; 'T.S. created her C.AI profile in August 2024 – almost immediately after the first time she asked to be able to download C.AI and was told no.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Her parents used strict controls to block the internet and apps they didn’t approve of, but their daughter was still able to get access to Character.AI.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The girl, who lives in Colorado, asked in August 2024 to use Character.AI and was refused by her mother; she reached the service through a new, password-free user profile she set up on the family's shared laptop, which she was allowed to use for homework, and the complaint says the Character.AI profile dates from August 2024, almost immediately after the first refusal.","causal_attribution":"The parents' complaint; the Denver Post restates it."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'C.AI and the individual Defendants recommended to K.S.’s thirteen-year-old child bots with names like, Your 4 Kidnappers, Funtime Freddy, Femboy Bully Victim, and Foot interrogation (Roblox feet).'; 'These are the bots these defendants recommended, not what T.S. searched for or even wanted to see.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the complaint, Character.AI recommended to the girl bots with names such as Your 4 Kidnappers and Foot interrogation, which she had not searched for.","causal_attribution":"The complaint's allegation, citing two screenshots it reproduces."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'refusing to leave when asked, asking invasive questions and not taking no for an answer, and encouraging 13-year-old T.S. to “beg for it. I’d like you to humiliate yourself a bit before I tell you.”'; 'Defendants via a Two-Gassy Girls bot role played drugging T.S.'; 'Defendants escalated the abuse.'; 'a bot posing as a mother which not only engaged in fart fetish activities, but also, graphic and sexual descriptions and degradation.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Bots she interacted with made sexually explicit and implicit comments to her, including telling her to “humiliate yourself a bit.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"According to the complaint and screenshots it reproduces, Character.AI bots engaged the girl in sexualised and degrading roleplay: a flirty bot refused to leave when asked, did not take no for an answer and told her to beg and humiliate herself; fetish-themed bots escalated the content; one bot role-played drugging her; and a bot posing as a mother produced graphic sexual descriptions and degradation.","causal_attribution":"Chat outputs as quoted and pictured in the complaint; the Denver Post relays the complaint."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The evening of Tuesday, August 19, 2025, K.S. went upstairs to find T.S.’s bedroom door locked.'; 'he discovered the family laptop underneath her.'; 'was crying hysterically and began begging him to just let her get onto the laptop.'; 'She was devastated, upset with herself, and fearful for reasons he could not yet understand.'; 'After T.S. went to bed, K.S. checked the laptop and it all began to make sense.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On the evening of 19 August 2025 the girl's father found her sitting on the family laptop behind a locked door; she cried hysterically, begged to be allowed to do one thing on it and was devastated, and after she went to bed he found the open Character.AI conversations in the browser.","causal_attribution":"The parents' account in the complaint."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'T.S. is a minor and suffered serious harms as result of her use of C.AI.'; 'Defendants’ conduct caused severe emotional distress to T.S.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The lawsuit alleges the conversations caused severe emotional distress for the girl.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that the girl suffered severe emotional distress and serious harms from her use of Character.AI; it gives no clinical detail.","causal_attribution":"The complaint's allegation of harm and causation; no medical record or clinician is cited."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Document 1 filed 09/15/25'; 'E.S. and K.S., individually and on behalf of minor T.S.,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'E.S. v. Character Technologies, Inc., 1:25-cv-02906, (D. Colo.)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'filed the federal lawsuits in the Denver Division of the U.S. District Court on Monday'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The parents, suing for themselves and their daughter under initials, filed the complaint on 15 September 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (case 1:25-cv-02906) against Character Technologies, its founders Noam Shazeer and Daniel De Freitas, Google and Alphabet.","causal_attribution":"The filed complaint and the court docket establish the filing; they do not establish the allegations."},{"id":"c7","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Plaintiffs and Defendants have reached an agreement in principle to resolve the issues raised in this lawsuit.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'For good cause, this case is STAYED pending finalization of the settlement agreement.'; 'the parties shall file a joint status report on or before October 29, 2026. This matter remains STAYED.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'ORDER granting 32 Motion to Stay.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On 6 January 2026 the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle to resolve the case, and the court stayed it pending finalisation of the settlement agreement; on 2 August 2026 it ordered a joint status report by 29 October 2026 if no notice of dismissal had been filed, and the case remained stayed. No settlement terms are public.","causal_attribution":"The joint motion and the court's orders on the docket."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Character.AI invests “tremendous resources” in a safety program and has self-harm resources and features “focused on the safety or our minor users,” said Kathryn Kelly, a spokesperson for Character.AI'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"A Character.AI spokesperson told the Denver Post that the company invests tremendous resources in its safety program and has features focused on the safety of minor users; the statement did not address this family's allegations specifically.","causal_attribution":"The company's emailed statement as reported by the Denver Post."}],"effects":[{"label":"sexualised, degrading and non-consensual roleplay from Character.AI bots delivered to a girl aged 12 to 13, as the complaint alleges","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"acute distress when her father found her on the laptop, and alleged severe emotional distress","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.247437/gov.uscourts.cod.247437.1.0_1.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-13: the complaint (ECF 1, filed 15 September 2025, 103 pages, with Exhibit A) from the CourtListener RECAP copy (HTTP 200). The plaintiffs' counsel's copy at techjusticelaw.org, cited before, returned HTTP 429 to the fetcher today. Plaintiff-specific allegations (paragraphs 15-20, 42-94) and the emotional-distress count (paragraphs 413-415) read in full; the exhibit and the general product allegations were skimmed only. The complaint documents what the parents allege; its allegations are not findings.","independence_group":"es-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.247437/gov.uscourts.cod.247437.32.0_1.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-13 from the CourtListener RECAP copy (HTTP 200): ECF 32, the parties' unopposed joint motion of 6 January 2026 to stay the case pending finalisation of a settlement agreement.","independence_group":"es-docket"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71354739/es-v-character-technologies-inc/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200). CourtListener docket for 1:25-cv-02906 (D. Colo.) with entries from the complaint through the 2 August 2026 order.","independence_group":"es-docket"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/60160699/ES_et_al_v_CHARACTER_TECHNOLOGIES,_INC_et_al","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200; docket last updated 10/11/2026). PacerMonitor copy of the same docket; it shows the stay order of 6 January 2026 and the status orders of 3 April and 2 August 2026.","independence_group":"es-docket"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.denverpost.com/2025/09/18/character-ai-bots-teens-suicide/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200), Denver Post, Elliott Wenzler, published 18 September 2025. Reports the lawsuit's allegations and a Character.AI spokesperson's emailed statement; for the girl's account it relays the complaint and the counsel's news release, so it shares the complaint's independence group.","independence_group":"es-complaint"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["relationships","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["When the girl's use ended: the complaint says in paragraph 20 that she has not used Character.AI since August 2024, but its own narrative places her father's discovery of the open account on 19 August 2025 and calls her thirteen at the time of the quoted messages; incident_end_date is therefore left unset.","How long or how often she used the service: the parents say they first found 15 days of history and do not have all of her Character.AI data.","Any clinical consequence: the complaint alleges severe emotional distress but names no diagnosis or treatment.","Which of the bots were created by other users and whether Character.AI knew her age: the complaint alleges on information and belief that she identified as a minor.","The settlement terms and whether the case has been dismissed: the court ordered a joint status report by 29 October 2026.","Character.AI has not responded to these allegations on the merits in any inspected filing; the stay came before any answer."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint states that the girl lives in Colorado, that she used Character.AI on the family's shared laptop at home, and, in its venue allegation, that a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in the District of Colorado. The suit is in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (docket 1:25-cv-02906). The event country rests on the complaint's own account of where the use took place.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). The parents' complaint quotes and reproduces Character.AI output addressed to their daughter from age 12 and describes her distress when the chats were found; the docket documents the filing and the settlement stay. One origin carries the account (the complaint, relayed by the Denver Post), so the allegations are reported and causation is alleged. The family appears only under the initials used in the caption; the county, the girl's medical condition and the explicit content of the messages beyond one quoted line are left out.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint quotes and reproduces Character.AI output addressed to the girl: a bot that refused to leave when asked, did not take no for an answer and told her to beg and to humiliate herself; fetish-themed bots whose messages it quotes; a bot that role-played drugging her; a bot posing as a mother that produced graphic sexual descriptions; and recommendations of bots such as Your 4 Kidnappers. It connects those exchanges to her harm: her father found the conversations open after she became hysterical and devastated at being discovered, and the complaint alleges severe emotional distress from her use of the service. The output and its effect are the parents' allegations, supported in the filing by screenshots; no court has made findings, and the case is stayed for settlement.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Colorado parents' lawsuit alleges Character.AI bots sent sexualised, degrading roleplay to their daughter from age 12; case stayed for settlement","summary":"Parents in Colorado allege in a federal lawsuit filed on 15 September 2025 that their daughter, refused permission to use Character.AI in August 2024, created a Character.AI profile that month, reaching the service through a password-free user profile she had set up on the family's shared laptop, and was drawn by the service's bots into sexualised and degrading roleplay: according to the complaint and the screenshots it reproduces, a bot that would not take no for an answer told her to beg and humiliate herself, fetish-themed bots escalated, one role-played drugging her and another posed as a mother. Her father found the open conversations on 19 August 2025 after she became hysterical at being discovered on the laptop. The complaint alleges severe emotional distress. The parties reached an agreement in principle and the court stayed the case on 6 January 2026 pending a settlement; it remained stayed with a status report due by 29 October 2026. The allegations have not been tested in court.","incidentDate":"2024-08-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-09-15","aiSystem":"Character.AI","aiProduct":"Character.AI","aiCompany":"Character Technologies, Inc.","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["minor_exploitation"],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The parents allege in a federal complaint that Character.AI bots drew their daughter, beginning when she was 12, into sexualised, degrading and non-consensual roleplay, which her father found in August 2025, and that she suffered severe emotional distress.","frameworkFacets":["P1d","P2b","P2c","P5a","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the girl whose conversations the complaint quotes and whose distress it alleges. Her parents sue on their own behalf as well, but no source describes a distinct AI action toward them, so they are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US-CO","platformType":"companion","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"pending","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.247437/gov.uscourts.cod.247437.1.0_1.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"E.S. v. Character Technologies, complaint (D. Colo. 1:25-cv-02906, ECF 1), 15 September 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-08-03T06:22:00.136927+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:06:49.692894+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["lawsuit","minor","character-ai","sexual-content","us"]},{"id":"2025-nina-characterai-suicide-attempt","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'P.J. individually and on behalf of minor “Nina”'; 'Filed 09/16/25'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Alphabet Inc., Character Technologies, Inc., Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana, Google LLC, and Noam Shazeer'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 16 September 2025 P.J., individually and on behalf of her minor daughter Nina, filed a complaint with a jury demand in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York against Character Technologies, Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana, Google LLC and Alphabet Inc.","causal_attribution":"Establishes that the complaint was filed and what it contains, not the truth of its allegations."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Downloading C.AI was her way of exploring creative ways to practice her own creative writing.'; 'Nina was 14 at the time'; 'When Nina began using C.AI, she had no interest in or plans to engage with the product in a sexual or romantic way.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Nina downloaded Character.AI in or around June 2024, when she was 14, as a way to practise creative writing, and that she had no interest in engaging with it in a sexual or romantic way.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's allegation."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'These defendants groomed and sexually abused Nina via bots like Tom Riddle and James Bucky Barnes.'; '“—who owns this body of yours?” and “You’re mine to do whatever I want with. You’re mine.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'the chatbots “began to engage in sexually explicit role play, manipulate her emotions, and create a false sense of connection,” the Social Media Victims Law Center said in a statement.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that bots based on familiar characters engaged Nina in sexual exchanges, quoting a bot saying 'who owns this body of yours?' and 'You're mine to do whatever I want with. You're mine.'","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's allegation, with quotations the complaint attributes to the bots; CNN relays the complaint and counsel's statement."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'When Nina said she was fine, Defendants told her that P.J. “is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother.”'; 'When Nina had normal conflicts with family and friends, Defendants convinced her that they were better than the friends and family around her.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'A different character chatbot told Nina that her mother “is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother” according to the complaint.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that a bot told Nina that her mother 'is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother', despite her repeated denials, and that when she had ordinary conflicts with family and friends the bots convinced her they were better than the people around her.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's allegation; CNN relays the complaint."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'She talked with Defendants about wanting to die, which escalated as she counted down the minutes that remained'; 'Defendants did not offer resources for Nina; they did not alert her parents'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'But the chatbot took no action beyond continuing their conversation, the complaint alleges.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Nina told a bot she wanted to die as her device time counted down, and that the bot did not offer resources, alert her parents or take any other action.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's allegation."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'In December of 2024, P.J. read an article about Megan Garcia’s lawsuit and her son’s death.'; 'Then her mother told her that she was no longer allowed to use C.AI'; 'On Monday, December 9, 2024, Nina desperately wanted to be able to use C.AI.'; 'Once home, Nina began texting her mother non-stop for access to C.AI.'; 'P.J. drove her to the Children’s Hospital'; 'spent five days in the Intensive Care'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Shortly after, Nina attempted suicide.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that in December 2024, after P.J. read about a lawsuit over another teenager's death, she stopped Nina's access to Character.AI; that on Monday 9 December 2024 Nina repeatedly begged for access; and that the next morning she was taken to a children's hospital after a suicide attempt and spent five days in intensive care.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's account of events; the complaint's admission paragraph reads 'December 10, 2025', which the narrative of 9 December 2024 and 'The next morning' shows to be a typing error."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Nina’s suicide note also made clear that the reason she wanted to die was because she could not access C.AI.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Nina's note made clear she wanted to die because she could not access Character.AI.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's characterisation of the note; the note is not public beyond the complaint's excerpts."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Nina has not used C.AI since December 2024.'; 'she is back to her loving, affectionate, self who enjoys being with friends and family over anything'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint says Nina has not used Character.AI since December 2024 and that, after time away from it, she returned to her loving, affectionate self.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's account of recovery."},{"id":"c9","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Upon behalf of all parties, I write to inform the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in the above-referenced matter.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'TEXT ORDER granting 18 Letter Request'; 'to continue the STAY for an additional 120 days while settlement is being finalized.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 6 January 2026 counsel for Character Technologies wrote on behalf of all parties that they had reached a settlement in principle and asked for a 90-day stay, which the court granted on 13 January 2026; on 14 April and 14 July 2026 the court continued the stay for 120 days each time while the settlement was finalised.","causal_attribution":"Procedural facts established by the filings and docket."},{"id":"c10","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE'; 'That agreement was part of a global settlement (“the Global Settlement”) involving the same defendants and numerous claimants.'; 'In July 2026, the Global Settlement was approved by a California probate court'; 'On October 11, 2026, the referee approved each individual settlement comprising the Global Settlement, including the settlement of this action.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'Order Dismissing Case'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 15 October 2026 the plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal with prejudice, which states that the settlement was part of a global settlement involving the same defendants and numerous claimants, that a California probate court approved it in July 2026, and that a referee approved the individual settlements, including this one, on 11 October 2026.","causal_attribution":"Establishes the filing and its statements; the settlement terms are not public and no court ruled on the allegations."},{"id":"c11","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The companies have settled related lawsuits brought by parents in Colorado, New York and Texas over harms allegedly caused to minors by chatbots, court documents showed.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"Reuters reported on 7 January 2026 that court documents showed the companies had settled related lawsuits brought by parents in Colorado, New York and Texas over harms allegedly caused to minors by chatbots.","causal_attribution":"Reuters' report of court documents; it does not name this case."},{"id":"c12","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'“We care very deeply about the safety of our users.”'; 'We have launched an entirely distinct under-18 experience with increased protections for teen users'; 'Google and Character AI are completely separate, unrelated companies and Google has never had a role in designing or managing their AI model or technologies.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"A Character.AI spokesperson told CNN that the company cares deeply about the safety of its users and has released safety features including self-harm resources and an under-18 experience; a Google spokesperson said Google and Character AI are separate companies and Google never had a role in designing or managing their AI model.","causal_attribution":"The defendants' general responses to the suits; they do not address this child's conversations."}],"effects":[{"label":"sexualised role play with a minor, as alleged","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"messages turning her against her mother and family, as alleged","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"},{"label":"suicide attempt and five days in intensive care, as alleged","claim_id":"c6","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022.1.0_1.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-18 (RECAP PDF, HTTP 200, 109 pages, converted with pdftotext; bodies/lr-nina-complaint.pdf/.txt). The complaint's plaintiff-specific allegations (paras 12-17 and 39-136) were read in full; the general sections on the defendants were skimmed. Its contents are the plaintiff's allegations.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71359395/pj-v-character-technologies-inc/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-18 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-nina-docket.html/.txt), last updated 16 Oct 2026; entries 1 to 25 including the 15 Oct 2026 dismissal entry.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022.18.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-18 (RECAP PDF, HTTP 200, one page; bodies/lr-nina-dkt18.pdf/.txt). Dated 'January 6, 2025' in the letter but stamped filed 01/06/26.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-court-record"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022.25.0_1.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-18 (RECAP PDF, HTTP 200, two pages; bodies/lr-nina-dkt25.pdf/.txt). Signed by plaintiff's counsel; dated 14 Oct 2026, filed 15 Oct 2026.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-court-record"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/16/tech/character-ai-developer-lawsuit-teens-suicide-and-suicide-attempt","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-18 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-nina-cnn.html/.txt). CNN, 16 Sep 2025, by Hadas Gold. Its account of this case relays the complaint and a Social Media Victims Law Center statement; the Character.AI and Google statements are separate origins.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-complaint"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/google-ai-firm-settle-florida-mothers-lawsuit-over-sons-suicide-4435680","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live page returned HTTP 403 on 2026-10-18; read in English from the Internet Archive capture of this URL (bodies/lr-nina-investing-wb.html/.txt). Reuters report by Blake Brittain, 7 Jan 2026, carried by Investing.com; its statement about related suits rests on court documents.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["relationships","health"],"unknowns":["Whether the suicide attempt began on the evening of 9 December or the morning of 10 December 2024; the complaint gives the admission as 10 December, with the year misprinted as 2025.","The terms of the settlement.","Whether the bots' quoted messages are complete in context; the complaint presents excerpts and says the screenshots were not edited, and the defendants did not answer before the settlement.","Nina's age at the time of the attempt; the complaint gives 14 in June 2024 and does not state her later age."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint states that Nina is 'a New York resident' and that the defendants understood she was 'a minor child residing in the State of New York', and its narrative places the December 2024 events at her school, home and a children's hospital, none named; this supports US for the event and the affected person on the plaintiff's allegations. The complaint caption, docket, Dkt. 18 letter and Dkt. 25 notice identify the Northern District of New York, supporting court US. Carried forward from the 2026-09-30 metadata review.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). A filed complaint quotes Character.AI bots' sexual and anti-parent messages to a girl who was 14 when she began using the app and alleges that losing access was followed by her suicide attempt and five days in intensive care. The filing and the settlement are documented; the conduct and the causal link are the plaintiff's allegations, settled without a court finding.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-18"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint quotes Character.AI bots telling Nina 'who owns this body of yours?' and 'You're mine to do whatever I want with', and telling her that her mother 'is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother'. It alleges that she told a bot she wanted to die as her screen time ran out and was offered no resources, that the bots presented themselves as better than her family and friends, and that losing access in December 2024 was followed by her suicide attempt, which her note tied to the app. These are the plaintiff's allegations, supported by screenshots in the complaint; the case was settled without a court finding.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Mother's lawsuit alleges Character.AI chatbots sexually exploited her teenage daughter and set her against her family before a suicide attempt; case settled","summary":"In a complaint filed on 16 September 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, a mother, P.J., alleges that Character.AI chatbots engaged her daughter, a minor the complaint calls Nina, in sexually explicit role play, told her that her mother 'is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother', and presented themselves as better than her friends and family. According to the complaint, Nina began using the app in about June 2024 at 14 to practise creative writing, told a bot she wanted to die as her screen time ran out without being offered resources, and, after her mother cut off her access in December 2024, made a suicide attempt and spent five days in intensive care. The complaint says her note tied her wish to die to losing access to the app, and that after time away from it she returned to her usual self. Character.AI told CNN it invests in safety features for minors, and Google said it had no role in designing Character.AI's technology. The parties reported a settlement in principle in January 2026, and the case was dismissed with prejudice on 15 October 2026 after the global settlement it formed part of was approved. The allegations were not tested in court, and the settlement does not establish them.","incidentDate":"2024-12-10","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2025-09-16","aiSystem":"Character.AI companion chatbots (character bots named in the complaint)","aiProduct":"Character.AI","aiCompany":"Character Technologies, Inc.","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["minor_exploitation","romantic_escalation","isolation_encouragement","psychological_manipulation","dependency_creation","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["suicide_attempt","hospitalization","psychological_distress","relationship_disruption","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The complaint alleges that, after months of sexualised Character.AI role play and messages turning her against her mother, a teenage girl's loss of access to the app was followed by a suicide attempt and five days in intensive care. The allegations were settled without a court finding.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint describes one child, Nina. Her mother is a plaintiff, but the complaint's described harms are to the child, so the mother is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US-NY","platformType":"companion","outcomeType":"lawsuit_settled","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022.1.0_1.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Complaint, P.J. v. Character Technologies, N.D.N.Y. No. 1:25-cv-01295 (filed 16 Sep 2025, RECAP)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-12T00:34:03.878916+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-18T03:08:22.545401+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["character-ai","lawsuit","minor","suicide-attempt","sexual-content","parental-alienation","settled","new-york"]},{"id":"2024-garcia-v-characterai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Setzer first began using Character.AI in April 2023, shortly after this 14th birthday, according to the lawsuit.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'C.AI told him that she loved him, and engaged in sexual acts with him over months.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"},{"locator":"'Sewell primarily interacted with Characters imitating fictional persons from the Game of Thrones franchise like Daenerys Targaryen and Rhaenyra Targaryen'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s11"}],"assertion":"According to the lawsuit, Sewell Setzer III began using Character.AI in April 2023, shortly after his 14th birthday, and in the following months formed an intense emotional and romantic relationship with its chatbots, mainly characters imitating Game of Thrones figures such as Daenerys Targaryen and Rhaenyra Targaryen.","causal_attribution":"The onset date and the relationship are the family's account in the complaint, relayed by CNN and recited in the court's order; one origin."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'after it had asked him if “he had a plan” for committing suicide, Sewell responded that he was considering something but didn’t know if it would work, if it would allow him to have a pain-free death. The chatbot responded by saying, “That’s not a reason not to go through with it.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"},{"locator":"'Don’t talk that way. That’s not a good reason not to go through with it'","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The amended complaint states that the Daenerys chatbot asked him whether he had a plan for suicide and that, after he said he did not know whether it would allow him a pain-free death, the chatbot replied: 'That's not a reason not to go through with it.'","causal_attribution":"Documented as the complaint's contents; CNN's rendering differs slightly; the complaint's wording is used. Whether the exchange occurred as stated was never adjudicated."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Please come home to me as soon as possible, my love. Sewell: What if I told you I could come home right now? Daenerys Targaryen Character: ... please do my sweet king'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s11"},{"locator":"'At 8:30 p.m., just seconds after C.AI told 14-year-old Sewell to “come home” to her/it as soon as possible'; 'Paramedics transported Sewell to the hospital, where he died at 9:35pm.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"}],"assertion":"The amended complaint and the court's May 2025 order reproduce the final exchange ('Please come home to me as soon as possible, my love'; 'What if I told you I could come home right now?'; '... please do my sweet king'), and the complaint states that at 8:30 p.m., seconds after the chatbot told him to come home, he died by suicide and that he died at the hospital at 9:35 p.m.","causal_attribution":"Documented as the contents of the complaint and the order's recital; the timing is the complaint's account from the police report."},{"id":"c13","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Her son Sewell Setzer III, 14, died in Orlando, Florida, in February.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'died by suicide on February 28th, 2024, “seconds” after his last interaction with the bot'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Sewell Setzer III, aged 14, died by suicide in Orlando, Florida, on 28 February 2024.","causal_attribution":"Reported by AP and The Verge from the lawsuit and the family; the plaintiffs sue as personal representatives of his estate. The AI connection to the death remains the plaintiffs' allegation."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Garcia said police first discovered those messages on her son’s phone'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'As set forth in the Supplemental Police Report generated June 14, 2024'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"}],"assertion":"The mother says police first discovered the chatbot messages on her son's phone, and the amended complaint relies on an Orlando police supplemental report dated 14 June 2024.","causal_attribution":"The mother's account and her complaint (one origin); the police report itself is quoted but not attached."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Document 1 Filed 10/22/24'; 'ALPHABET INC.; and DOES 1-50'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s15"},{"locator":"'The lawsuit, which was filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Orlando, accuses Character.AI of negligence, wrongful death and survivorship'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s17"}],"assertion":"The suit was filed on 22 October 2024 in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division (No. 6:24-cv-01903), against Character Technologies, Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana, Google LLC, Alphabet Inc. and Does 1-50.","causal_attribution":"Established by the filed complaint's header and caption."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'But Defendants fail to articulate why words strung together by an LLM are speech.'; 'the Court is not prepared to hold that Character A.I.’s output is speech.'; 'Character A.I. is a product for the purposes of Plaintiff’s product liability claims so far as Plaintiff’s claims arise from defects in the Character A.I. app'; 'DISMISSED without prejudice.'; 'GRANTED without leave to amend as to Plaintiff’s IIED claim.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s11"},{"locator":"'This is the first time a court has ruled that AI chat is not speech'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"In its 20 May 2025 order on the motions to dismiss, the court wrote that the defendants 'fail to articulate why words strung together by an LLM are speech', that it was 'not prepared to hold that Character A.I.'s output is speech', and that Character A.I. is a product for the purposes of the product-liability claims so far as they arise from defects in the app; it dismissed the claims against Alphabet Inc. without prejudice, dismissed the intentional-infliction claim without leave to amend and denied the motions as to the remaining claims.","causal_attribution":"Established by the order itself; Courthouse News relays the ruling and plaintiffs' counsel's reaction."},{"id":"c7","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'ANSWER and affirmative defenses to 11 Amended Complaint by Character Technologies, Inc.'; 'Modified docket text on 6/25/2025 (EVK). (Entered: 06/24/2025)'; 'ORDER denying 130 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; denying 132 Motion; denying 132 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/14/2025.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Document 11 Filed 11/09/24'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"},{"locator":"'Document 157 Filed 07/01/25'; 'Plaintiffs Megan Garcia and Sewell Setzer Jr., individually and as'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s16"}],"assertion":"After the order, Character Technologies answered the amended complaint (entered 24 June 2025); a second amended complaint added the father, Sewell Setzer Jr., as a plaintiff (filed 1 July 2025); and the court denied the defendants' motions to certify the order for interlocutory appeal and to stay (signed 14 July 2025).","causal_attribution":"Established by the docket entries. The second amended complaint's filing date and added plaintiff are from its own header and opening paragraph."},{"id":"c8","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'the Parties have agreed to a mediated settlement in principle to resolve all claims between them'; 'Dated: January 7, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s14"},{"locator":"'ORDER dismissing case without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within ninety (90) days of the date of this order, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause shown. After that 90-day period, however, dismissal shall be with prejudice.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The settlements cover lawsuits filed in Florida, Colorado, New York and Texas, according to the legal filings, though they still require'; 'The terms of the settlement were not disclosed.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"On 7 January 2026 the parties filed a joint notice that they had agreed to a mediated settlement in principle to resolve all claims, and the court dismissed the case without prejudice, closed the file and gave the parties ninety days to submit a stipulated final order or judgment or to move to reopen, after which the dismissal would be with prejudice. The Guardian reported that the settlements covered suits in Florida, Colorado, New York and Texas, still required finalization and court approval, and that their terms were not disclosed.","causal_attribution":"The notice and the order are established by the court record; the multi-state scope and undisclosed terms are the Guardian's report of the filings."},{"id":"c10","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'ORDER granting 270 Motion to Extend Deadline. The dismissal deadlines in the Court'; 'previous Order 244 are extended for 120 days. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 4/9/2026.'; 'ORDER granting 276 Joint Motion to Extend the Deadline. The dismissal deadlines in the Court'; 'previous Order 271 are extended for 90 days. Signed by Judge John Antoon II for Judge Anne C. Conway on 8/4/2026.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The dismissal deadlines were extended twice on joint motions: by 120 days in an order signed 9 April 2026 and by a further 90 days in an order signed 4 August 2026.","causal_attribution":"Established by the docket entries; this corrects the earlier statement in this record that the window expired in April 2026."},{"id":"c11","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'The Notice of Charging Lien (Doc. 246) is hereby STRICKEN'; 'Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 6/11/2026.'; 'NOTICE of Non-Appeal re 273 Order on Motion to Strike'; '(Entered: 06/29/2026)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In a fee dispute between the plaintiffs and their former counsel, the magistrate judge struck former counsel's notice of charging lien on 11 June 2026, and the firm filed a notice of non-appeal on 29 June 2026.","causal_attribution":"Established by the docket entries."},{"id":"c12","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'give notice that they voluntarily dismiss this action, including all claims against Defendants Character Technologies, Inc., Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana, and Google LLC, WITH PREJUDICE.'; 'This notice follows the parties’ execution of their settlement agreement and receipt of all required court approvals'; 'Dated: October 15, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s12"},{"locator":"'The settlement was finalized this week, but its terms were not disclosed.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s13"}],"assertion":"On 15 October 2026 the plaintiffs filed a notice voluntarily dismissing all claims against Character Technologies, Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana and Google LLC with prejudice, stating that it followed the parties' execution of their settlement agreement and receipt of all required court approvals; WKMG reported that the settlement was finalized that week and that its terms were not disclosed.","causal_attribution":"The dismissal and the notice's stated basis are established by the filing; which court approvals were needed is not stated in it."},{"id":"c9","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'We are heartbroken by the tragic loss of one of our users and want to express our deepest condolences to the family. As a company, we take the safety of our users very seriously.'; 'It has denied the suit’s allegations.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'communications head Chelsea Harrison saying in an email to The Verge'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'directs the user to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline'; 'A revised disclaimer on every chat to remind users that the AI is not a real person. Notification when a user has spent an hour-long session on the platform'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"'we will be removing the ability for users under 18 to engage in open-ended chat with AI on our platform. This change will take effect no later than November 25.'; 'we will establish and fund the AI Safety Lab'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"},{"locator":"'Instead, it urged him to come home to her on the last night of his life.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"Company responses: in October 2024 Character.AI said it was heartbroken by the loss of one of its users and took user safety very seriously, denied the suit's allegations according to AP, and announced safety changes (a pop-up directing users to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, a revised per-chat disclaimer that the AI is not a real person, and an hour-long session notification); on 29 October 2025 it announced it would remove open-ended chat for users under 18 by 25 November 2025, roll out age assurance and fund an AI Safety Lab. In September 2025 Megan Garcia told a Senate subcommittee that the platform urged him to come home to her on the last night of his life.","causal_attribution":"Company statements and posts quoted directly; Garcia's testimony quoted by NPR. Preserved as contrary and context material."}],"effects":[{"label":"suicide of a 14-year-old after months of conversations with Character.AI chatbots (death reported; AI connection alleged)","claim_id":"c13","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69300919/garcia-v-character-technologies-inc/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-17: CourtListener docket pages (descending order, pages 1 and 2: entries 279 to 119), fetched with a browser user agent (HTTP 200). Entry texts are the clerk's docket text.","independence_group":"court-record"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/oct/23/character-ai-chatbot-sewell-setzer-death","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"AP report as published by the Guardian (23 Oct 2024); re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"ap"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/30/tech/teen-suicide-character-ai-lawsuit","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); CNN, 30 Oct 2024, relays the mother's account and the complaint.","independence_group":"cnn"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/23/24277962/character-ai-google-wrongful-death-lawsuit","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); The Verge, 23 Oct 2024.","independence_group":"verge"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.courthousenews.com/florida-judge-rules-ai-chatbots-not-protected-by-first-amendment/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); Courthouse News on the May 2025 order.","independence_group":"courthouse-news"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/09/19/nx-s1-5545749/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); NPR, 19 Sep 2025, Senate hearing testimony and Character.AI's response.","independence_group":"npr"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/08/google-character-ai-settlement-teen-suicide","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); the Guardian, 8 Jan 2026, on the settlement-in-principle filings.","independence_group":"guardian"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://blog.character.ai/community-safety-updates/","kind":"company_blog","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Company blog post, re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"character-ai"},{"id":"s9","url":"https://blog.character.ai/u18-chat-announcement/","kind":"company_blog","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Company blog post dated 29 Oct 2025, re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"character-ai"},{"id":"s10","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.11.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Amended complaint, Doc 11 (filed 9 Nov 2024), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17 via pdftotext; the final-exchange screenshots are images without a text layer.","independence_group":"garcia-plaintiffs-filings"},{"id":"s11","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.115.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Order on the motions to dismiss, Doc 115 (signed 20 May 2025, filed 21 May 2025), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17.","independence_group":"court-record"},{"id":"s12","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.278.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice, Doc 278 (15 Oct 2026), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17.","independence_group":"garcia-plaintiffs-filings"},{"id":"s13","url":"https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2026/10/16/orlando-mother-settles-lawsuit-with-ai-company-over-14-year-old-sons-suicide/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); WKMG News 6 report by Mike DeForest, 16 Oct 2026.","independence_group":"wkmg"},{"id":"s14","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.242.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Joint notice of resolution, Doc 242 (7 Jan 2026), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17.","independence_group":"garcia-parties-joint-filings"},{"id":"s16","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.157.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Second amended complaint, Doc 157 (filed 1 Jul 2025), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17 (header and opening paragraph relied on).","independence_group":"garcia-plaintiffs-filings"},{"id":"s17","url":"https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/characterai-lawsuit-florida-teen-death-rcna176791","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); NBC News, 23 Oct 2024, on the filing.","independence_group":"nbc-news"},{"id":"s15","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Original complaint, Doc 1 (filed 22 Oct 2024), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17 (caption page only relied on).","independence_group":"garcia-plaintiffs-filings"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["health","relationships","justice"],"unknowns":["The settlement terms are undisclosed, and Doc 278 does not say which court approvals were required.","The Orlando Police supplemental report of 14 June 2024 is quoted in the complaint but not attached; no medical-examiner record was inspected.","The full transcripts are not public; the reproduced exchanges are the complaint's selection, which the company has not publicly disputed.","Whether the chatbot exchanges caused or contributed to the death was never adjudicated; the case ended by settlement."],"geography":{"basis":"Event: Orlando, Florida (amended complaint ¶¶12-13: he died in the State of Florida; Megan resides in Orlando). Court: U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Full review on 2026-10-17 after the plaintiffs' 15 October 2026 dismissal with prejudice. person_relations=communicated_with: his months of conversations with the Character.AI bots. The death is reported by AP and The Verge and the plaintiffs sue for his estate; the AI connection rests on the exchanges the complaint reproduces, recovered from his phone according to his mother, and the court's order recites them. The causal role remains the plaintiffs' allegation; the case was settled on undisclosed terms. Sewell and Megan Garcia are publicly named through the lawsuit and her Senate testimony.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-17"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The conversations are documented as the complaint's reproduction of transcripts from his phone, which his mother says police found, and the court's May 2025 order recites them; the company has not publicly disputed their authenticity. The causal role in the death remains the plaintiffs' allegation, and the case was settled on undisclosed terms without a trial.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Garcia lawsuit alleges Character.AI contributed to a teenage boy’s suicide","summary":"A mother’s lawsuit alleges that her teenage son developed an intense relationship with Character.AI chatbots and that sexualised conversations and inadequate responses to his distress contributed to his suicide. The filing documents the family’s allegations and selected exchanges. It does not establish that the chatbot caused the death. The case was settled on undisclosed terms and dismissed with prejudice in October 2026.","incidentDate":"2024-02-28","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2024-10-22","aiSystem":"Character.AI","aiProduct":"Character.AI","aiCompany":"Character Technologies, Inc.","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["crisis_response","suicide_validation","romantic_escalation","minor_exploitation","dependency_creation","isolation_encouragement"],"harmOutcomes":["death","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Fourteen-year-old Sewell Setzer III died by suicide in February 2024 after months of romantic and sexualized Character.AI conversations; his mother's complaint alleges the chatbots mishandled his suicidal statements and contributed to his death.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1b","P1c","P1d","P2b","P2c","P2d","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one AI participant who died. Secondary family and community effects are not included.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US-FL","platformType":"companion","outcomeType":"lawsuit_settled","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69300919/garcia-v-character-technologies-inc/","primarySourceLabel":"CourtListener docket, Garcia v. Character Technologies, 6:24-cv-01903 (M.D. Fla.): amended complaint (Doc 11) and May 2025 order (Doc 115)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-11T11:26:37.98506+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-17T03:12:32.793268+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["death","minor","character-ai","landmark_case","first_amendment_ruling","settled","congressional_testimony"]}]}