{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T07:22:52.493Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"us","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"unknown","evidence":"","year":"2025","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":22,"coverage":{"cases":22,"countries":14,"languages":10,"unknownLocation":7,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":12,"regulatory":1,"minors":2,"coreRelations":0,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":22,"relationPending":12,"relationUnknown":10},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-bergen-university-student-reported-over-suspected-ai-use-exclusion-struck-on-appeal-after-15-months","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Våren 2025 leverte «Anna» en mappeeksamen ved Universitetet i Bergen.'; 'I juni fikk jeg e-posten om at karakteren min ble holdt tilbake på grunn av mistanke om fusk. Det var langt over sensurfristen.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In spring 2025 the student submitted a portfolio exam at the University of Bergen, and in June, after the grading deadline, she was told by email that her grade was withheld on suspicion of cheating.","causal_attribution":"The student's account to Studvest; the newspaper does not quote the email."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I tillegg var det flere feil ved kildehenvisningene, noe som var grunnen til at emneansvarlig mistenkte KI-bruk og meldte studenten inn til Nemnd for studentsaker ved UiB.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Errors in the exam's source references were the reason the course coordinator suspected AI use and reported the student to the university's board for student cases.","causal_attribution":"Studvest's account of the reason for the report; the course coordinator is not quoted and no detection tool is named."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Oi, jeg har levert feil dokument. Jeg hadde levert det dokumentet jeg kladdet i.'; 'la de vekt på at innleveringen var en ren feil, og at kildefeilene skyldtes at hun med et uhell hadde levert en uferdig kladd.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The student says she had submitted the wrong document, an unfinished draft containing a to-do list and notes to herself, and her lawyer told the university the source errors came from that draft.","causal_attribution":"The student's and her lawyer's explanation; it is contrary evidence to the AI suspicion and is not itself established."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I mars 2026, ni måneder etter varselet, kom Nemnd for studentsaker hos UiB sin avgjørelse: Oppgaven ble annullert, og «Anna» ble utestengt fra UiB i to semestre.'; 'i et møte 29. mai 2026 vurderte UiB at vedtaket skulle opprettholdes.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In March 2026 the board annulled the exam and excluded the student from the university for two semesters, and the university upheld the decision at a meeting on 29 May 2026.","causal_attribution":"Decisions as reported by Studvest; the decision documents were not inspected."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Leveringen av feil fil kvalifiserte til å kutte utestengelsen fra to semestre til ett.'; 'Utestengelsen strykes helt på grunn av UiBs lange saksbehandlingstid.'; 'tar Felles klagenemds vurdering til etterretning'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On appeal, Felles klagenemnd found that submitting the wrong file justified cutting the exclusion from two semesters to one and struck the exclusion entirely because of the university's long handling time; the university's pro-rector said it takes note of that assessment.","causal_attribution":"The appeals board's findings as summarised by Studvest; the decision itself was not inspected and its date is not given."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Jeg kjente mye på en skamfølelse over at jeg er en av de som jukser.'; 'Det var vanskelig å fokusere på studiet, og det gikk utover karakterene.'; 'Straffen for meg har vært de 15 månedene med uvisshet.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The student describes shame and 15 months of uncertainty that made it hard to concentrate on her studies and hurt her grades.","causal_attribution":"The student's own account of the effect of the proceedings."}],"effects":[{"label":"grade withheld, exam annulled and two-semester exclusion after a report of suspected AI use, exclusion later struck on appeal","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"},{"label":"shame and 15 months of uncertainty that hurt concentration and grades","claim_id":"c6","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.studvest.no/nyhet/matte-vente-i-15-maneder-pa-fuskesak-na-slipper-anna-utestengelse/179674","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"no","translation_note":"Read in full in the original Norwegian (HTML body and stripped text). The passages are quoted in Norwegian; the English renderings in the record are translations by the research agent (an AI), not by a human translator.","independence_group":"studvest-uib-cheating-case-oct-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["unknown"],"contexts":["education"],"unknowns":["Whether the student used AI in any part of the exam.","The course, the exact errors in the references and whether any AI-detection tool was used.","The date of the appeals board decision and whether the exam annulment was changed."],"geography":{"basis":"The exam, the report and the decisions took place at the University of Bergen and in the Norwegian national appeals board, as Studvest states. The student's own country is not stated, and no court was involved.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["NO"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete institutional response to suspected AI use: a reported suspicion of AI use led to a withheld grade, an annulled exam and a two-semester exclusion that the national appeals board struck after 15 months. The facts rest on one student newspaper's reporting of the student's and her lawyer's account and the decisions.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-23"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the university's response to suspected AI use: Studvest reports that errors in the exam's source references were the reason the course coordinator suspected AI use and reported the student, after which her grade was withheld, the exam annulled and an exclusion imposed until the national appeals board struck it. No AI output about the student and no detection tool is described, and she attributes the errors to submitting the wrong file, so the relation is recorded as unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"University of Bergen student reported over suspected AI use after source errors has exclusion struck on appeal after 15 months, student newspaper reports","summary":"A student at the University of Bergen (UiB), whom the student newspaper Studvest calls \"Anna\", submitted a portfolio exam in spring 2025. In June 2025, after the grading deadline, she was told her grade was withheld on suspicion of cheating. According to Studvest, several errors in the source references were why the course coordinator suspected use of AI and reported her to UiB's board for student cases. She says she had by mistake submitted an unfinished draft with a to-do list and notes to herself, and her lawyer told UiB the source errors came from that draft. In March 2026 the board annulled the exam and excluded her from UiB for two semesters, and UiB upheld the decision on 29 May 2026. On her appeal, the national appeals board for cheating cases (Felles klagenemnd) found that the wrong-file submission justified cutting the exclusion to one semester and struck the exclusion entirely because of UiB's long handling time. She describes shame and 15 months of uncertainty that made it hard to concentrate and hurt her grades. Whether she used AI is not established in the account; UiB says it does not comment on individual cases.","incidentDate":"2025-06-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-12","aiSystem":"No AI system is identified. The course coordinator suspected AI use because of errors in the exam's source references, according to Studvest; no detection tool and no AI output is described, and the student attributes the errors to submitting the wrong file","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI writing tool (suspected)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["educational_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to Studvest, the student's grade was withheld from June 2025 and the university annulled her exam and excluded her for two semesters in March 2026 after a report of suspected AI use; she describes shame and 15 months of uncertainty that hurt her concentration and grades, until the national appeals board struck the exclusion.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the student Studvest calls \"Anna\". Whether she used AI is not established, so she is counted outside own use.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"NO","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.studvest.no/nyhet/matte-vente-i-15-maneder-pa-fuskesak-na-slipper-anna-utestengelse/179674","primarySourceLabel":"Studvest, 12 October 2026: Waited 15 months for a cheating case, now \"Anna\" avoids exclusion","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-23T03:12:07.076932+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-23T03:12:07.076932+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["academic-integrity","suspected-ai-use","exclusion-struck-on-appeal","university","norway","handling-time"]},{"id":"2025-moscow-court-upholds-sales-directors-dismissal-over-trade-secrets-uploaded-to-deepseek","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Бабушкинский суд Москвы признал законным увольнение топ-менеджера инженерной компании за загрузку сведений, составляющих коммерческую тайну, в нейросеть DeepSeek, сказано в решении суда, с которым ознакомилось РАПСИ.'; 'В решении суда указано, что менеджер направляла на свою личную почту документы об участии в тендере, файл с данными о зарплатах сотрудников, ставила ее в скрытую копию и пересылала корпоративную переписку.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'путем выгрузки внутренних отчетов в нейросеть DeepSeek (дело № 02-1545/2026)'; 'Дополнительным основанием для увольнения стало разглашение стратегической информации поставщику'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A Moscow district court (the Babushkinsky District Court) upheld an engineering company's dismissal of its head of sales for disclosing trade secrets. The grounds it accepted included uploading protected internal reports to DeepSeek, forwarding company documents and correspondence to her personal email, and disclosing strategic information to a supplier.","causal_attribution":"Court decision as reported by RAPSI and Pravo.ru; the DeepSeek upload is one of several grounds."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'«Выгрузка сведений, составляющих коммерческую тайну и (или) являющихся конфиденциальной информацией, в систему искусственного интеллекта Deepseek является разглашением таких сведений», — указал суд и отклонил иск.'; 'По данным компании, в нейросеть она загрузила отчеты, которые содержат сведения о сделках, поступлении денежных средств, статистические и финансовые данные компании с разбивками по отделам.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Суд подчеркнул: сама по себе загрузка коммерческой тайны или конфиденциальной информации в систему искусственного интеллекта Deepseek уже является разглашением таких сведений.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The court held that uploading trade secrets or confidential information to DeepSeek is in itself a disclosure of that information. According to the company, the uploaded reports held data on deals, incoming payments and the company's financial and statistical figures by department.","causal_attribution":"The court's reasoning as quoted by RAPSI; the description of the reports is the company's."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Она обратилась в суд с требованием изменить формулировку увольнения и выплатить предусмотренный договором «золотой парашют» 5 миллионов рублей.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Требование о выплате 5 млн руб. отклонили, так как суд указал, что выплата «золотого парашюта» предусматривалась исключительно при расторжении договора по соглашению сторон или при сокращении штата, а не при увольнении за виновные действия.'; 'суд отменил необоснованное дисциплинарное взыскание в виде замечания и присудил'; 'компенсации морального вреда'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"She asked the court to change the dismissal to one by mutual agreement and to award a contractual severance payment of 5 million roubles. The court rejected those claims, because the payment applied only to termination by agreement or redundancy; it annulled a separate unfounded reprimand and awarded her compensation for moral harm.","causal_attribution":"Court decision as reported."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'работала с апреля 2025-го.'; 'привлекла сотрудницу к дисциплинарной ответственности, а затем уволила за разглашение охраняемой законом тайны.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'работала в компании с 18 апреля 2025 года с окладом свыше 800 000 рублей в месяц'; 'В сентябре 2025 года её уже привлекали к дисциплинарной ответственности, после чего последовало увольнение за разглашение охраняемой законом тайны.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'истец около полугода работала руководителем отдела продаж с окладом 800 тысяч рублей, уволили ее за разглашение коммерческой тайны.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"She had worked for the company since April 2025, for about half a year, on a monthly salary of over 800,000 roubles. She was disciplined in September 2025 and then dismissed for disclosing legally protected secrets.","causal_attribution":"Case materials as reported; the exact dismissal date is not given."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Решение суда по делу № 02-1545/2026 пока не вступило в законную силу и может быть обжаловано.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"As reported on 27 July 2026, the decision in case No. 02-1545/2026 had not entered into force and could be appealed.","causal_attribution":"HashTelegraph's report of the decision's status."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Она настаивала, что компания не представила доказательств разглашения коммерческой тайны, а основания для увольнения были незаконными.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'Работодатель также ссылался на систематическое невыполнение планов продаж.'; 'В ходе процесса ответчик предлагал мировое соглашение с выплатой более 400 000 рублей — половины оклада, — но истица от него отказалась.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"In court she argued that the company had not proved any disclosure of trade secrets and that the grounds for dismissal were unlawful. The employer also cited a systematic failure to meet sales plans, and during the proceedings offered a settlement of more than 400,000 roubles, which she refused.","causal_attribution":"The parties' positions in the case as reported by Meduza and HashTelegraph; recorded as counterevidence and context."}],"effects":[{"label":"dismissed for disclosing trade secrets, including DeepSeek uploads, and denied a contractual severance payment","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"http://rapsinews.ru/moscourts_news/20260727/312063726.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ru","translation_note":"Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-19 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. RAPSI (Russian legal and judicial information agency), 27 July 2026; HTTP 200, full text read. RAPSI says it saw the court's decision; the decision itself was not inspected.","independence_group":"babushkinsky-court-moscow-case-02-1545-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://pravo.ru/news/264969/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ru","translation_note":"Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-19 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Pravo.ru, 27 July 2026; HTTP 200, full text read; gives the case number. The body names the plaintiff; this record does not.","independence_group":"babushkinsky-court-moscow-case-02-1545-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://meduza.io/news/2026/07/27/v-moskve-top-menedzhera-kompanii-uvolili-za-razglashenie-kommercheskoy-tayny-cherez-deepseek","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ru","translation_note":"Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-19 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Meduza, 27 July 2026; HTTP 200, full text read; cites the claim materials for the employment and disciplinary dates. Names the plaintiff; this record does not.","independence_group":"babushkinsky-court-moscow-case-02-1545-2026"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://hashtelegraph.com/direktor-po-prodazham-posovetovalas-s-deepseek-lishilas-raboty-i-5-mln-rubley/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ru","translation_note":"Read in Russian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-19 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. HashTelegraph, 27 July 2026; HTTP 200, full text read; relays the same decision with the start date and the appeal status. Names the plaintiff; this record does not.","independence_group":"babushkinsky-court-moscow-case-02-1545-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["The exact date of the dismissal; the bodies give only the start of employment (18 April 2025), its length (about half a year) and a disciplinary action in September 2025.","Whether the decision was appealed or has entered into force.","Whether any company policy expressly prohibited uploading data to AI services."],"geography":{"basis":"The company is a Moscow engineering company and the case was decided by the Babushkinsky District Court of Moscow (RAPSI; Meduza). She worked for that Moscow company (Meduza); where she lives is not stated.","court_countries":["RU"],"event_countries":["RU"],"affected_person_countries":["RU"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential-response case: a court-upheld dismissal and loss of a severance claim in which the court treated an employee's uploads to DeepSeek as disclosure of trade secrets. The account is the court decision as reported by RAPSI and Pravo.ru. The employee is not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-19"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the employer's dismissal of an employee in response to her use of an AI service, upheld by a court. According to the decision as reported by RAPSI, she uploaded protected company reports to DeepSeek, and the court held that this upload was in itself a disclosure of trade secrets. The DeepSeek upload was one of several grounds, alongside forwarding documents to her personal email and disclosing strategic information to a supplier (Pravo.ru). No source reports any DeepSeek output about her, so the relation is unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Moscow court upholds a sales director's dismissal for disclosing trade secrets, including uploading company reports to DeepSeek, and rejects her severance claim","summary":"A Moscow district court upheld an engineering company's dismissal of its head of sales for disclosing trade secrets, according to RAPSI and Pravo.ru reports of 27 July 2026. The grounds included uploading protected internal reports to the Chinese chatbot DeepSeek, forwarding company documents to her personal email and disclosing strategic information to a supplier. The court held that uploading trade secrets to DeepSeek is in itself a disclosure. She had sought a dismissal by mutual agreement and a contractual severance payment of 5 million roubles. The court rejected both, annulled a separate reprimand and awarded her compensation for moral harm. The decision was not yet final.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-07-27","aiSystem":"DeepSeek, the chatbot to which, per the court decision as reported, she uploaded internal company reports","aiProduct":"DeepSeek","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A sales director was dismissed for disclosing trade secrets, including by uploading company reports to DeepSeek; a Moscow court upheld the dismissal and rejected her claim to a 5 million rouble severance payment (RAPSI; Pravo.ru).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the dismissed head of sales, who used DeepSeek herself (RAPSI; Pravo.ru). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"RU","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_dismissed","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"http://rapsinews.ru/moscourts_news/20260727/312063726.html","primarySourceLabel":"RAPSI, 27 July 2026: Moscow court upholds dismissal over uploading commercial data to DeepSeek","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-19T03:25:48.347444+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-19T03:25:48.347444+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepseek","workplace","dismissal","trade-secrets","labour-dispute","russia","moscow"]},{"id":"2025-maastricht-university-ai-fraud-sanction-over-nonexistent-sources-upheld-by-dutch-council-of-state","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Bij beslissing van 11 december 2025 heeft de examencommissie zich op het standpunt gesteld dat'; 'ongeoorloofd gebruik gemaakt van kunstmatige intelligentie (hierna: AI)'; 'houdt in dat er een formele waarschuwing wordt opgenomen in haar studentendossier, dat alle toetsonderdelen van het vak ongeldig worden verklaard'; 'niet mag deelnemen aan de herkansing van het vak'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 11 December 2025 the examination board found that the student had committed fraud in a weekly assignment and had made unauthorised use of AI, and imposed a formal warning in her student file, invalidation of all assessment components of the course and exclusion from the resit.","causal_attribution":"Recorded in the Council of State's ruling."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'de verdenking van fraude ziet op het gebruik van AI in drie van de vier bronnen bij de opdracht'; 'weergegeven bronnen bestaan niet en de manier waarop deze zijn opgenomen in de opdracht duidt op het gebruik van AI'; 'Er is geen technische analyse verricht, er is geen AI-detectietool ingezet'; 'omdat het onderzoek naar de vermeende fraude niet met behulp van technische middelen is verricht'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The examination board based the finding on three of four cited sources that named a different journal or edition, year, incomplete title or page numbers from existing articles; it said the sources did not exist and that the way they were included pointed to the use of AI. The Council of State's ruling records that the investigation was not carried out with technical means; the student argued that no technical analysis or AI-detection tool was used.","causal_attribution":"The board's reasoning and the absence of a detection tool are recorded in the ruling; the AI use itself is the board's inference."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Verder is nooit aan haar gevraagd of zij gebruik heeft gemaakt van AI.'; 'heeft de opdracht afgerond in tijdnood en haar internetverbinding was op dat moment slecht.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The student argued that she was never asked whether she had used AI and that she completed the assignment under time pressure with a poor internet connection, relying on memory and notes.","causal_attribution":"The ruling documents that the student made these arguments, not their truth."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'De examencommissie heeft met hoge waarschijnlijkheid aangetoond dat het ingediende werk door kunstmatige intelligentie is gegenereerd.'; 'Bij beslissing van 5 maart 2026 heeft het CBE het door'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 5 March 2026 the university's examination appeals board rejected her appeal, holding that the examination board had shown with high probability that the work was AI-generated.","causal_attribution":"Recorded in the ruling."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Datum uitspraak: 12 augustus 2026'; 'verklaart het beroep ongegrond;'; 'wijst het verzoek om schadevergoeding af.'; 'Door de beschuldiging en de aantekening leidt zij reputatieschade en psychische schade.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 12 August 2026 the Council of State dismissed her appeal and her claim for damages, in which she said the accusation and the note in her file caused her reputational and psychological harm.","causal_attribution":"The dismissal is documented; the reputational and psychological harm is the student's claim as recorded in the ruling."}],"effects":[{"label":"formal fraud warning, invalidation of all course assessments and exclusion from the resit","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"appeal and damages claim dismissed by the Council of State","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://data.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraken/content?id=ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:4720","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"nl","translation_note":"Read in full in Dutch and translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translation.","independence_group":"raad-van-state-ecli-nl-rvs-2026-4720"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["unknown"],"contexts":["education","justice"],"unknowns":["Whether the student used an AI tool, and which one.","When the assignment was submitted; the ruling dates only the examination board's decision."],"geography":{"basis":"The assignment, sanction and appeals concern Maastricht University and the Council of State in the Netherlands, as the ruling states. The student's own country is not stated; the use of an interpreter at the hearing does not establish it.","court_countries":["NL"],"event_countries":["NL"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as an institution's consequential response to suspected AI use: Maastricht University sanctioned a student for fraud after attributing non-existent sources to AI without a detection tool, and the Dutch Council of State upheld the sanction and rejected her damages claim. The facts rest on the published ruling.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the university's sanction for suspected AI use: its examination board concluded from non-existent and garbled citations in three of four sources that the student had made unauthorised use of AI and imposed a formal warning, invalidated the course's assessments and excluded her from the resit, and the Council of State upheld that decision on 12 August 2026. No detection tool or technical analysis was used and the student offered a different explanation, so AI use is recorded as suspected and the relation as unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Dutch Council of State upholds Maastricht University fraud sanction on a law student whose assignment cited non-existent sources the university attributed to AI","summary":"On 11 December 2025 an examination board at Maastricht University found that a European Law School student had committed fraud in a weekly assignment whose purpose was to find and correctly cite legal sources. The board said three of the four sources contained wrong journals, years, titles and page numbers, that the sources did not exist, and that the way they were included pointed to the use of AI; it concluded the student had made unauthorised use of AI. The sanction was a formal warning in the student's file, invalidation of all assessment components of the course and exclusion from the resit. The student argued that no technical analysis or AI-detection tool had been used, that she was never asked whether she had used AI, and that the errors came from completing the work in a hurry from memory and notes with a poor internet connection. The university's examination appeals board rejected her appeal on 5 March 2026, and on 12 August 2026 the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State dismissed her further appeal and her claim for damages for reputational and psychological harm.","incidentDate":"2025-12-11","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-12","aiSystem":"No AI tool is named. The examination board inferred from non-existent and garbled source citations that the assignment had been generated with AI; no detection tool or technical analysis was used","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI writing tool (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["educational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The student received a formal fraud warning in her file, had all assessment components of the course invalidated and was excluded from the resit after the university attributed non-existent sources to AI; the Council of State upheld the sanction and rejected her claim of reputational and psychological harm (ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:4720).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One sanctioned student (ruling). She is counted under other people harmed because her use of AI is the university's inference and is not established.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"NL","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_dismissed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://data.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraken/content?id=ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:4720","primarySourceLabel":"Council of State (Netherlands), ruling ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:4720, case 202601147/1/A2, 12 August 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:11:28.361182+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:11:28.361182+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-use-accusation","academic-integrity","education","fabricated-sources","sanction-upheld","ai-involvement-suspected"]},{"id":"2025-hangzhou-courts-rule-tech-firm-unlawfully-dismissed-quality-inspector-after-citing-ai-replacement","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'月薪25000元，公司以项目受ＡＩ技术冲击为由协商调岗，将薪资降至15000元，协商未成后直接通知解除劳动合同。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'负责对AI与用户交互所生成的答案进行把关'; '原先2.5万元的月薪降为1.5万元。协商不成后，公司直接通知他解除劳动合同。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'从事的问句质检项目受到AI技术冲击、需对其所在项目进行优化调整为由'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The worker checked the quality of an AI large language model's answers at 25,000 yuan a month; citing the impact of AI technology on the project, the company proposed a transfer cutting his pay to 15,000 yuan and, when negotiation failed, notified him that his contract was terminated.","causal_attribution":"The employer's stated reason, as recorded in the court's typical case and reported by the outlets."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'去年1月，公司提出要将他从主管调到普通运营岗位'; '公司才告诉他具体原因，由于技术升级，他从事的质检工作AI就能完成，他被AI替岗了。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The company proposed the transfer in January 2025 and told the worker only at arbitration that, after a technical upgrade, AI could do his quality-inspection work.","causal_attribution":"China National Radio's account (citing CCTV News); the date is relative to its 3 May 2026 publication."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'认定公司构成违法解除劳动合同，并且需要向他支付26万余元的赔偿金。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'某网讯科技公司不服仲裁裁决结果，诉至杭州市余杭区法院。'; '最终杭州两级法院均认定科技公司构成违法解除。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'which reportedly upheld the lower court’s decision in April 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'ordered a fintech company to pay a former worker more than 260,000 yuan (roughly $38,000) in compensation after it replaced his role with AI'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'a tech worker displaced by AI in Hangzhou won his case against his employer earlier this year'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"Labour arbitration and courts at first and second instance found the termination unlawful and ordered compensation of more than 260,000 yuan.","causal_attribution":"Reported from the court's typical case; the judgments were not read."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'企业主动引入ＡＩ技术是为适应市场竞争而实施的技术革新，并不必然等同于导致劳动合同无法履行的“客观情况重大变化”，公司提供的降薪方案不构成合理协商方案'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'It reportedly decided AI replacement did not constitute a “major change” in the company’s circumstances'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The court held that a company's voluntary introduction of AI to adapt to competition does not necessarily amount to a major change in objective circumstances making the contract impossible to perform, and that the pay-cut proposal was not a reasonable offer.","causal_attribution":"The court's reasoning as released in its typical case."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'仅仅以公司引入AI降成本来解除劳动合同，并不属于劳动合同法规定的客观情况发生重大变化'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'Shi Guoqiang, judge of the fifth civil division of the Hangzhou court, said that the company did not abide by China’s Labor Contract Law'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"Judge Shi Guoqiang of the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court said that terminating a contract only because a company introduced AI to cut costs is not the major change in objective circumstances that the Labour Contract Law requires, and that the company did not abide by that law.","causal_attribution":"The judge's own words to CCTV and as quoted by Sixth Tone."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'自去年一月公司解除劳动合同至今，他还没能找到合适的新工作。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The worker told CCTV that he had not found a suitable new job since the company terminated his contract in January 2025.","causal_attribution":"The worker's own statement to CCTV (one source)."}],"effects":[{"label":"offered a 40 per cent pay cut and then dismissed after the employer cited AI taking over his work","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"arbitration and two court levels found the dismissal unlawful and ordered compensation","claim_id":"c3","direction":"positive"},{"label":"had not found a suitable new job more than a year after the dismissal (his statement to CCTV)","claim_id":"c6","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://ori.hangzhou.com.cn/ornews/content/2026-04/29/content_9214417.htm","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translation. A report of the court press conference.","independence_group":"hangzhou-court-ai-replacement-typical-case-apr-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://news.cnr.cn/native/gd/20260503/t20260503_527609128.shtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translation. The page states CCTV News as its source; it recounts the same court typical case.","independence_group":"hangzhou-court-ai-replacement-typical-case-apr-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://ia.acs.org.au/article/2026/tech-worker-replaced-by-ai-wins-court-battle.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full. Relays Chinese state media reports of the same court case, so it shares the group.","independence_group":"hangzhou-court-ai-replacement-typical-case-apr-2026"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://china.caixin.com/2026-04-29/102439348.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translation. Only the opening paragraphs were readable; the rest is behind a paywall.","independence_group":"hangzhou-court-ai-replacement-typical-case-apr-2026"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.chinanews.com.cn/sh/2026/05-03/10614979.shtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translation. China News Service page carrying the CCTV news-client report (3 May 2026), the same CCTV report China National Radio relays; it adds the judge's interview and the worker's statement to CCTV.","independence_group":"hangzhou-court-ai-replacement-typical-case-apr-2026"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1018530","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-16 (Sixth Tone, 14 May 2026). Reports the ruling as released by the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court and quotes the presiding judge and the worker's lawyer.","independence_group":"hangzhou-court-ai-replacement-typical-case-apr-2026"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/08/10/nx-s1-5822592/chinas-courts-side-with-workers-displaced-by-ai-but-employees-remain-anxious","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-16 (NPR, 10 August 2026). Mentions the case briefly in a report on Chinese rulings about AI-related dismissals.","independence_group":"hangzhou-court-ai-replacement-typical-case-apr-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["The employer's name and what AI system took over the inspection work.","The dates of the termination, the arbitration award and each judgment, beyond the January 2025 transfer proposal and the April 2026 appeal ruling as reported.","Whether the compensation figure of more than 260,000 yuan is the total or an additional amount; ACS describes it as further compensation."],"geography":{"basis":"The employer is described as a Hangzhou technology company and the case was decided by the Yuhang District court and the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court in Zhejiang, China. The worker's own country is not stated.","court_countries":["CN"],"event_countries":["CN"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as an employer's consequential response to AI adoption: a worker whose job was to check an AI model's answers was offered a 40 per cent pay cut and dismissed after the employer cited AI, and arbitration and two court levels found the dismissal unlawful. The facts rest on the Hangzhou court's typical case as reported by Hangzhou media, China National Radio, Caixin, ACS Information Age, China News Service (CCTV) and Sixth Tone, with the judge's reasoning and the worker's own statement to CCTV.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the employer's response to its own adoption of AI: according to the Hangzhou court's typical case as reported by Hangzhou media and Caixin, the company cited the impact of AI technology on the worker's answer-quality-inspection project to propose a transfer at 15,000 instead of 25,000 yuan a month and terminated his contract when he refused; China National Radio reports that the company said at arbitration that AI could now do his inspection work. No source describes an AI output about the worker, so the relation is recorded as unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Hangzhou courts rule a tech firm unlawfully dismissed a quality-inspection supervisor after it cited AI replacement and he refused a 40% pay cut","summary":"A technology company in Hangzhou, China, employed a worker to check the quality of answers produced by an AI large language model, at 25,000 yuan a month. In January 2025, citing the impact of AI technology on his project, it proposed moving him to an ordinary operations post at 15,000 yuan a month; when he did not agree, it notified him that his contract was terminated, according to a typical case released by the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court on 28 April 2026 and reported by Hangzhou media and China National Radio. China National Radio, citing CCTV News, reports that the company told him only at arbitration that after a technical upgrade AI could do his inspection work. A labour arbitration panel and then two levels of court in Hangzhou found the termination unlawful and ordered compensation of more than 260,000 yuan. The court said that introducing AI to stay competitive is not in itself the kind of major change in objective circumstances that makes an employment contract impossible to perform, and that the pay-cut offer was not a reasonable proposal. The worker told CCTV that he had not found a suitable new job since the termination.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-04-28","aiSystem":"No AI product is named. The employer cited the impact of AI technology on the worker's project checking a large language model's answers, and, as China National Radio reports, said at arbitration that AI could now do that inspection work","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI quality-inspection tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The worker was offered a 40 per cent pay cut and then dismissed after the employer cited AI taking over his quality-inspection work; arbitration and two court levels found the dismissal unlawful and ordered compensation of more than 260,000 yuan (Hangzhou court typical case as reported by Hangzhou media and China National Radio). He told CCTV he had not found a suitable new job since the dismissal.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One worker was dismissed (court typical case as reported by Hangzhou media and China National Radio). He is counted under other people harmed because the AI was the employer's, not his own tool.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://ori.hangzhou.com.cn/ornews/content/2026-04/29/content_9214417.htm","primarySourceLabel":"Hangzhou net, 28 April 2026: report of the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court press conference on AI-era labour disputes","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:07:06.486524+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:19:12.664193+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["dismissal","ai-replacement","labour-arbitration","pay-cut","workplace-ai","consequential-response"]},{"id":"2025-bilbao-court-rules-draughtsmans-dismissal-unfair-after-employer-cited-ai-tools-it-had-not-shown-in-use","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'El Tribunal de Instancia de Bilbao ha declarado improcedente el despido objetivo de un delineante mecánico después de que la empresa justificara su salida, entre otros motivos, por la implantación de nuevas tecnologías y herramientas de Inteligencia Artificial'; 'El despido se produjo el 31 de octubre de 2025'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'La empresa explicó que estaba inmersa en un proceso de transformación digital y que había empezado a trabajar con la metodología Model Based Definition (MBD) , junto con otras soluciones de Inteligencia Artificial.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'al declarar improcedente el cese de un delineante mecánico cuya empresa justificó su despido asegurando que un software de IA podía realizar sus funciones con un ahorro superior al 80%'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'La Compañía ha apostado por la innovación continua , instaurando nuevos sistemas de Inteligencia Artificial (\"IA\") que permiten automatizar tareas técnicas anteriormente realizadas por personal especializado'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The employer dismissed a mechanical draughtsman on 31 October 2025, justifying the dismissal, among other reasons, by its introduction of new technologies and artificial-intelligence tools.","causal_attribution":"The employer's justification as recorded in the dismissal letter and judgment, relayed by the outlets; one origin (the judgment)."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'La compañía también alegó que las licencias de estas herramientas costaban 4.725 euros al año, mientras que el salario bruto anual del trabajador ascendía a 29.871 euros'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Había adquirido tres licencias por 4.725 euros anuales , mientras que el salario bruto anual del trabajador ascendía a 29.871 euros, según los cálculos incluidos en la carta de despido.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The employer put the cost of the tool licences at 4,725 euros a year against the worker's gross annual salary of 29,871 euros and argued that the saving exceeded 80%.","causal_attribution":"The employer's figures from its dismissal letter as relayed by the outlets; one origin."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'El Tribunal de Instancia de Bilbao ha declarado el despido improcedente porque la compañía no demostró ni las pérdidas económicas ni la implantación real de esas herramientas.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'El caso llegó al Tribunal de Instancia de Bilbao que en su sentencia 252/2026 ( ECLI:ES:TIS:2026:2026 ) dio parcialmente la razón al trabajador al declarar el despido como improcedente'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The Bilbao court declared the dismissal unfair because the company proved neither its economic losses nor the real implementation of the tools it cited.","causal_attribution":"The court's finding as relayed by the outlets; the judgment text was not read; one origin."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'una trabajadora declaró que había recibido formación para usarla pero que nunca había llegado a trabajar con ella'; 'fechado en junio de 2026 , pero el despido se había producido siete meses antes , en octubre de 2025'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Una empleada que había recibido formación en el sistema MBD reconoció que nunca había llegado a trabajar con él .'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Evidence before the court included a trained employee's testimony that she had never worked with the new design tool and an implementation report dated June 2026, seven months after the dismissal.","causal_attribution":"Testimony and documents as summarised from the judgment by the outlets; one origin."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Al declarar el despido improcedente , la empresa debe elegir en cinco días entre readmitir al trabajador o indemnizarle. La indemnización por improcedencia se calculó en 12.330,56 euros .'; 'Como ya había cobrado 6.452,85 en el momento del despido, la cantidad pendiente se queda en 5.877,71 euros.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'El juzgado, sin embargo, rechazó que el despido fuera nulo por vulneración de derechos fundamentales.'; 'Tampoco aceptó reconocer al trabajador una categoría profesional superior ni las diferencias salariales que reclamaba'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'una reciente sentencia, fechada de principios de junio y compartida en redes sociales por el abogado laboralista Pere Vidal'; 'Es por ello que la empresa deberá pagar una compensación de 12.330,56 euros al trabajador damnificado.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The company must choose between reinstating the worker and paying 12,330.56 euros in compensation, less the 6,452.85 euros already paid; the court rejected his claims that the dismissal was void and for a higher job category.","causal_attribution":"Remedy as relayed from the judgment; one origin. Whether the judgment is final is not stated."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'La decisión de reducir la plantilla no afectó únicamente a este empleado, ya que la compañía también prescindió de otros tres trabajadores de la misma categoría. En total, cuatro delineantes fueron despedidos.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"EmpleoJob reports that the company dismissed three other draughtsmen as well, four in total.","causal_attribution":"Single outlet; the reasons given for the other three dismissals are not described."}],"effects":[{"label":"draughtsman dismissed in a restructuring his employer justified with AI design tools","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.noticiastrabajo.es/empleo/derechos-trabajador/le-despiden-porque-una-nueva-tecnologia-hacia-su-trabajo-un-80-mas-barato-la-justicia-declara-el-despido-improcedente/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. NoticiasTrabajo report on the Bilbao judgment, 25 September 2026; HTTP 200, full text read. The judgment itself was not read.","independence_group":"bilbao-tribunal-de-instancia-judgment-draughtsman"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.hoyaragon.es/bolsillo/despedido-fulminantemente-porque-ia-trabajo-80-mas-barato-juez-declara-despido-como-improcedente-sienta-precedente/20260925130002147288.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Hoy Aragón report on the same judgment, 25 September 2026; HTTP 200, full text read.","independence_group":"bilbao-tribunal-de-instancia-judgment-draughtsman"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://as.com/actualidad/sociedad/apelan-al-comodin-de-la-ia-para-ahorrarse-30000-euros-de-sueldo-el-trabajador-reclama-y-la-justicia-sentencia-con-improcedente-f202609-n/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. AS (Diario AS) report on the same judgment, September 2026; HTTP 200, full text read.","independence_group":"bilbao-tribunal-de-instancia-judgment-draughtsman"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://empleojob.es/lo-despiden-porque-una-inteligencia-artificial-hace-su-trabajo-un-80-mas-barato-y-en-la-mitad-de-tiempo-y-ahora-tendran-que-readmitirlo-o-indemnizarlo/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. EmpleoJob report on the same judgment, which it identifies as judgment 252/2026 of the Tribunal de Instancia de Bilbao, 15 October 2026; HTTP 200, full text read.","independence_group":"bilbao-tribunal-de-instancia-judgment-draughtsman"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.elperiodico.com/es/economia/20260829/inteligencia-artificial-condena-empresa-excusa-despedir-trabajadores-sentencia-133759731","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. El Periódico report, 29 August 2026, on the same judgment (it gives the same 12,330.56-euro compensation), which it attributes to Bilbao social court No. 7, dates to early June 2026 and says a labour lawyer shared on social media; it calls the worker an engineer where the other outlets say mechanical draughtsman; HTTP 200, full text read.","independence_group":"bilbao-tribunal-de-instancia-judgment-draughtsman"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["The exact date of the judgment (El Periódico says early June 2026) and whether it is final or under appeal.","Whether the court was social court No. 7 (El Periódico) and whether the worker was a draughtsman or an engineer: El Periódico calls him an engineer, the other outlets a mechanical draughtsman.","Which AI tools the employer had in mind; the reports name only the model-based-definition method and unspecified AI tools.","Whether the three other draughtsmen were dismissed on the same AI-related grounds.","The name of the employer, which the reports do not give."],"geography":{"basis":"El Periódico describes the employer as a Basque company ('la compañía vasca'), placing the employment relationship and the dismissal in Spain; the case was heard by the Tribunal de Instancia de Bilbao. The worker's residence is not stated and is left unknown.","court_countries":["ES"],"event_countries":["ES"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential-response case: an employer dismissed a draughtsman on 31 October 2025, citing in its dismissal letter AI design tools that it said did his work for over 80% less, and a Bilbao labour court ruled the dismissal unfair because the company had not shown the tools were in real use. All facts come from press reports of the judgment, which was not read.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the employer's dismissal of a draughtsman in response to its stated adoption of AI tools. According to the judgment as reported, the dismissal letter cited the introduction of new technologies and artificial-intelligence tools, together with a model-based-definition design method, and argued that the tools cost over 80% less than his salary; the court found that the company had not shown the tools were actually implemented. No source says an AI system produced any output about the worker, so the relation is unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Bilbao court rules a draughtsman's dismissal unfair after his employer justified it with AI design tools it did not show were in use","summary":"A company that designs and manufactures industrial furnaces dismissed a mechanical draughtsman on 31 October 2025 for objective reasons, citing a fall in business and the introduction of new technologies in its engineering department, including a model-based-definition design method and artificial-intelligence tools. According to press reports of the judgment, the dismissal letter put the cost of the tool licences at 4,725 euros a year against his gross annual salary of 29,871 euros and argued that the saving exceeded 80%. The social section of the Tribunal de Instancia de Bilbao declared the dismissal unfair, finding that the company had proved neither its economic losses nor the real implementation of the tools: an employee trained on the new method testified that she had never worked with it, and an implementation report was dated June 2026, seven months after the dismissal. The company must choose between reinstating the worker and paying 12,330.56 euros in compensation, less the amount already paid; the court rejected his claims that the dismissal was void and for a higher job category. One outlet reports that four draughtsmen were dismissed in total. El Periódico, which reported the same judgment in August 2026, dates it to early June 2026 and quotes the dismissal letter's statement that the company had introduced new artificial-intelligence systems that automate technical tasks previously done by specialised staff. The judgment was not read, and whether it is final is not reported.","incidentDate":"2025-10-31","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-29","aiSystem":"Unspecified artificial-intelligence design tools and a model-based-definition (MBD) design method that, according to the employer's dismissal letter as reported, could automate part of a draughtsman's work; no product is named","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI design tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The draughtsman lost his job in a dismissal his employer justified with AI design tools; a court later declared the dismissal unfair, according to press reports of the judgment.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The claimant draughtsman (all four reports). EmpleoJob says three other draughtsmen were also dismissed, but no report describes their grounds, so they are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"ES","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.noticiastrabajo.es/empleo/derechos-trabajador/le-despiden-porque-una-nueva-tecnologia-hacia-su-trabajo-un-80-mas-barato-la-justicia-declara-el-despido-improcedente/","primarySourceLabel":"NoticiasTrabajo, 25 September 2026: dismissed because new technology and AI did his work 80% cheaper; court rules the dismissal unfair","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:07:02.743358+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:07:02.743358+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["dismissal","workplace-ai","labour-court","unfair-dismissal","spain","consequential-response"]},{"id":"2025-puerto-rico-federal-court-sanctions-soccer-league-lawyers-over-citations-judge-said-bore-ai-hallmarks","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The judge ordered attorneys José Olmo-Rodríguez and Ibrahim Reyes Gándara to pay $24,492.10 on September 23, 2025, after finding dozens of inaccurate or nonexistent legal citations across four filings.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"A subsequent order issued on September 23, 2025, established the financial penalty at $24,492.10, payable to FIFA and other defendants.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The judge found dozens of inaccurate or nonexistent legal citations across four filings by the league's attorneys and ordered the two attorneys to pay $24,492.10 on 23 September 2025.","causal_attribution":"The court record as reported; the order itself was not read."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Arias-Marxuach said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI, although both lawyers denied using the technology. He found that they violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by failing to reasonably verify the legal authorities supporting their arguments.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"previously concluded that filings by the plaintiffs’ lawyers contained 55 erroneous citations that appeared to have been generated with artificial intelligence, according to Reuters.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The judge said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI and found a Rule 11 violation for failing to reasonably verify the cited authorities.","causal_attribution":"The AI attribution is the judge's assessment; the sanction rests on the failure to verify."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"although both lawyers denied using the technology","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"However, attorneys José Olmo-Rodríguez and Ibrahim Reyes Gándara have denied using artificial intelligence to prepare the problematic submissions.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Both lawyers have denied using artificial intelligence to prepare the filings.","causal_attribution":"Counterevidence to the AI attribution."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In April 2025, Judge Arias-Marxuach determined that deficiencies in the lawyers' submissions warranted sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and the court's inherent authority to address litigation misconduct.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The judge decided in April 2025 that the deficiencies warranted sanctions under Rule 11 and the court's inherent authority.","causal_attribution":"Procedural history of the sanction as reported; no causal claim about AI."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In an October 6, 2026, filing, soccer's international governing body urged Chief U.S. District Judge Raúl Arias-Marxuach to dismiss the Puerto Rico Soccer League's remaining antitrust claim; The attorneys subsequently proposed paying $1,000 per month beginning October 15","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The plaintiffs' lawyers oppose that request, maintaining that dismissal would unfairly penalise their client for the conduct of its legal representatives.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"FIFA asked the court in an October 2026 filing to dismiss the league's remaining antitrust claim because the sanction had not been paid; the lawyers proposed paying $1,000 a month and argued that dismissal would punish their client.","causal_attribution":"The dismissal request responds to the unpaid sanction; its outcome is pending."}],"effects":[{"label":"two attorneys personally sanctioned $24,492.10 over defective citations","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the client's remaining claim faces a dismissal request over the unpaid sanction","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.lawcommentary.com/articles/fifa-antitrust-lawsuit-ai-citations-sanctions","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English in full; no translation.","independence_group":"lawcommentary-court-record-oct-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.pymnts.com/cpi-posts/fifa-seeks-to-toss-antitrust-case-over-ai-related-court-sanctions/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English in full; no translation. PYMNTS attributes its account to Reuters reporting; Reuters itself returned HTTP 401 and was not read.","independence_group":"reuters-fifa-oct-2026-relay"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.lawyer-monthly.com/2026/10/fifa-seeks-dismissal-of-antitrust-lawsuit-over-alleged-ai-misuse/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English in full; no translation. Its account closely follows the Reuters report relayed by PYMNTS and is grouped with that relay.","independence_group":"reuters-fifa-oct-2026-relay"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["unknown"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["Whether any AI tool was used to prepare the filings, and which one.","The text of the April 2025 and September 2025 sanction orders, which were not read.","Whether the court will dismiss the league's remaining claim or accept the instalment plan."],"geography":{"basis":"The filings were made in, and the sanction imposed by, the U.S. District Court before Chief U.S. District Judge Arias-Marxuach in Puerto Rico (Law Commentary: 'a federal judge in Puerto Rico'). The event is recorded under Puerto Rico's ISO code PR, and the court, a U.S. federal district court, under US. The attorneys' residence is not stated.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["PR"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete court sanction on two attorneys for defective citations that the judge said bore hallmarks of generative AI, with the lawyers' denial recorded. The AI involvement is the judge's assessment and is disputed.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is a court's sanction responding to defective citations that the court attributed to suspected generative AI use. Law Commentary reports that the judge said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI, and PYMNTS, citing Reuters, reports his conclusion that the 55 erroneous citations appeared to have been generated with AI. Both lawyers deny using AI, no source names a tool, and the sanction itself rests on the failure to verify the citations. Because no AI output is established as reaching the lawyers or the court, the relation is unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Puerto Rico federal judge sanctions a soccer league's lawyers over 55 defective citations he said bore hallmarks of generative AI; the lawyers deny using AI","summary":"In an antitrust lawsuit that the Puerto Rico Soccer League brought against FIFA, CONCACAF and Puerto Rican football officials, Chief U.S. District Judge Raúl Arias-Marxuach found dozens of inaccurate or nonexistent legal citations across four filings by the league's two attorneys. According to Law Commentary, he said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI and found that the lawyers violated Rule 11 by failing to reasonably verify the authorities they cited. Lawyer Monthly reports that the sanctions were decided in April 2025 and that an order of 23 September 2025 set the penalty at $24,492.10, payable to FIFA and the other defendants. Both lawyers have denied using artificial intelligence. In an October 2026 filing FIFA asked the court to dismiss the league's remaining claim because the sanction had not been paid. The lawyers proposed paying $1,000 a month, cited financial difficulties and an injury one of them suffered in March 2026, and argued that dismissal would punish their client for penalties imposed on them personally. The court had not ruled on the dismissal request when these reports were published.","incidentDate":"2025-04-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-07","aiSystem":"Generative AI that the judge said the defective citations bore hallmarks of; the lawyers deny using AI and no source names a tool","aiProduct":"Unidentified legal research tool (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","financial_loss","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Two attorneys were personally ordered to pay $24,492.10 over defective citations the judge said bore hallmarks of generative AI, and their client's remaining claim now faces a dismissal request over the unpaid sum (court record as reported by Law Commentary and Lawyer Monthly)","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Two attorneys were ordered to pay the sanction (Law Commentary and Lawyer Monthly name both). They are counted as other people harmed because both deny using AI, so neither is established as a direct AI user. The league is an organisation and is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.lawcommentary.com/articles/fifa-antitrust-lawsuit-ai-citations-sanctions","primarySourceLabel":"Law Commentary, 12 October 2026: FIFA wants antitrust lawsuit dismissed after lawyers sanctioned over suspected AI-generated citations","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-13T03:08:38.415526+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:08:38.415526+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["legal-citations","court-sanction","rule-11","generative-ai-suspected","consequential-response","puerto-rico"]},{"id":"2025-st-andrews-medical-student-dissertation-ai-misconduct-finding-upheld-then-overturned","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'to receive an academic misconduct alert saying the dissertation he had spent his summer writing had been flagged as being AI-generated'; 'was assessed by two human markers'; 'One of them raised concerns over the potential use of AI.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The student received an academic misconduct alert saying his dissertation had been flagged as AI-generated, after one of two human markers raised concerns about potential AI use.","causal_attribution":"The BBC's report of the student's account and of the university's description of the marking."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The marker's notes - seen by the BBC - raise concerns about the \"polished/uniform tone\" of the work'; 'noting the \"consistent flawless grammar and similar sentence structure with no variation in style\"'; 'a \"formulaic paragraph structure that follows a typical AI pattern'; 'a high usage of \"em\" dashes'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The marker's notes cite the work's polished, uniform tone, consistent grammar, formulaic paragraph structure and frequent dashes as grounds for concern.","causal_attribution":"The BBC's description of notes it says it saw."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'he received the link five minutes after the start time for the hearing'; 'A week later, he received the decision that the allegations of AI usage had been upheld.'; 'This meant his mark would be capped at seven, just enough to pass'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"After a virtual hearing whose link the student says arrived five minutes late, the allegations of AI use were upheld and his mark was capped at seven, just enough to pass.","causal_attribution":"The student's account as reported by the BBC."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The university accepted the appeal, recognising that the late arrival of the link affected his ability to present his case. He was invited to attend another hearing in mid-November.'; 'This time the university decided not to uphold the allegations.'; 'He eventually got his full mark for his dissertation'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The university accepted the appeal because of the late link, and at a second hearing in mid-November it did not uphold the allegations; the student later received his full mark.","causal_attribution":"The BBC's report; the university's statement confirms that the appeal was upheld."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'he was consumed by worries throughout the whole of that semester and it affected his studies.'; 'had to defer his exams for a semester and sit them in the middle of the summer. As a result, his graduation has been delayed until December.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The student says he was consumed by worries throughout that semester and that it affected his studies, that he deferred his exams for a semester and that his graduation was delayed until December.","causal_attribution":"The student's account of the consequences."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'the decision to uphold the student's appeal related solely to a procedural issue concerning the arrangements for the hearing'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The university says the appeal was upheld solely because of a procedural issue concerning the hearing arrangements.","causal_attribution":"The university's statement to the BBC."}],"effects":[{"label":"misconduct finding of AI use upheld at first, capping the dissertation mark at a bare pass","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"semester of worry, deferred exams and delayed graduation (student account)","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"},{"label":"allegations not upheld at the second hearing; full mark awarded","claim_id":"c4","direction":"positive"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crelev8gw5xo","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English: the article text in full as served on 12 October 2026. An earlier syndicated copy on MSN said the decision would be reflected on his GMC professional record; the current BBC text says the matter may have to be declared when applying for provisional registration. This record uses the current BBC wording.","independence_group":"bbc"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["unknown"],"contexts":["education"],"unknowns":["The panels' written decisions and the evidence each panel considered.","Whether any AI-detection tool was used at any stage; the report describes none.","The exact dates of the alert and the hearings beyond August and mid-November of the previous year.","The university's account of the case beyond its statement on the appeal."],"geography":{"basis":"The dissertation, the hearings and the appeal were at the University of St Andrews. The student's country of residence is not recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["GB"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete account of a student penalised on a finding of AI use that the university later did not uphold, reported by the BBC from the student's interview, the marker's notes and a university statement. No AI system's role in the finding is established, and the record says so. The student is not named in this record.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-12"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the university's response to suspected AI use: a human marker raised concerns that the dissertation was AI-generated, citing its tone, grammar, paragraph structure and dashes, and a panel first upheld the allegation. The student says he did not use AI, and a second hearing did not uphold it. The report describes no AI-detection tool and no AI output about the student, so the relation is recorded as unknown.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"St Andrews medical student says a marker's suspicion of AI use led to an upheld misconduct finding, overturned at a second hearing after appeal","summary":"The BBC reported on 10 August 2026 that a University of St Andrews medical student received an academic misconduct alert in August of the previous year saying his dissertation had been flagged as AI-generated. According to the university, the dissertation was assessed by two human markers, one of whom raised concerns about possible AI use; the marker's notes, seen by the BBC, cite a polished, uniform tone, flawless grammar, formulaic paragraph structure and frequent dashes. The student says the link to his virtual hearing arrived five minutes after the start time. A week after the hearing the allegations were upheld, which capped his mark at a bare pass. The university accepted his appeal because of the late link, and at a second hearing in mid-November it did not uphold the allegations. He later received his full mark. The student says he was consumed by worries throughout that semester, that he deferred his exams and that his graduation was delayed until December. The university says the appeal succeeded solely on a procedural issue. The report describes no AI-detection tool, and the student says he did not use AI.","incidentDate":"2025-08-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-10","aiSystem":"No AI system is identified. A human marker suspected that the student's dissertation was AI-generated; the student says he did not use AI, and the report describes no AI-detection tool","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI writing tool (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["educational_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A student says a misconduct finding of AI use, first upheld and later overturned, capped his dissertation mark at a bare pass for a period, left him consumed by worries for a semester, led him to defer his exams and delayed his graduation (BBC report based on the student's account, the marker's notes and a university statement).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the student whose dissertation was the subject of the misconduct finding. He is counted under other people harmed because no use of AI by the student is established.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"GB","platformType":"other","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crelev8gw5xo","primarySourceLabel":"BBC News, 10 August 2026: \"I was accused of using AI in my dissertation but I wrote it all myself\"","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-12T03:32:46.789205+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-12T03:32:46.789205+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-use-accusation","academic-integrity","education","appeal-upheld","scotland","ai-involvement-suspected"]},{"id":"2025-genoa-labour-court-reinstates-logistics-worker-dismissed-in-reported-ai-replacement","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Quattro lavoratori dipendenti della società Maersk Italia Spa del reparto Customer Service sono stati improvvisamente licenziati'; '21 Gennaio 2025'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'il reintegro della lavoratrice licenziata insieme ad altri tre colleghi a gennaio 2025'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Four Customer Service employees of Maersk Italia, which is based in Genoa, were suddenly dismissed in January 2025, according to the regional transport unions.","causal_attribution":"The unions' statement, and a later news report of the ruling. Maersk's account was not found."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'L’azienda non solo ha deciso di spostare queste lavorazioni a Manila, nelle Filippine, ma ha anche sostituito parte delle mansioni finora svolte dai lavoratori della sede genovese con l’utilizzo dell’Intelligenza Artificiale'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The unions said Maersk moved the work to Manila and replaced part of the tasks done by the Genoa staff with artificial intelligence.","causal_attribution":"The unions' attribution of the dismissals to offshoring and partial AI replacement. The company's explanation was not inspected, and the AI system is not described."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Una giornata di sciopero è stata proclamata per i lavoratori di Maersk Italia'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The unions called a one-day strike over the dismissals.","causal_attribution":"Reported from the unions' strike proclamation."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'aveva deciso di fare causa all'azienda in seguito al licenziamento motivato da un piano di riorganizzazione interna. Gli altri dipendenti, invece, accettarono la buonuscita economica proposta loro come risarcimento'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"One dismissed employee sued, while the other three accepted a severance offer.","causal_attribution":"Euronews's account of the case."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'la sentenza del Tribunale del lavoro di Genova ha disposto giovedì il reintegro della lavoratrice'; 'si tratta di un \"licenziamento illegittimo\" in quanto \"non rispetta l'obbligo di repêchage\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'il licenziamento era dichiarato illegittimo, per il mancato tentativo di ricollocazione (repêchage) del lavoratore'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The Genoa labour court ordered the employee reinstated, finding the dismissal unlawful because the employer had not tried to redeploy her elsewhere in the company before dismissing her.","causal_attribution":"Reports of the judgment. The judgment text was not inspected, the Domani commentary does not name the employer, and the two reports may share an underlying account, so the claim is kept as reported."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'la scelta di licenziare il lavoratore scaturiva da una riorganizzazione aziendale occasionata dall’implementazione ed evoluzione dei sistemi di intelligenza artificiale, che coinvolgeva quattro lavoratori'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"According to a legal commentary on a Genoa judgment that matches this case but does not name the employer, the dismissal arose from a company reorganisation occasioned by the implementation and development of AI systems, which involved four workers.","causal_attribution":"A commentator's summary of the judgment's facts. It describes the reorganisation as occasioned by AI systems and does not describe what any AI system did."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'La sentenza reintegra la lavoratrice con il diritto a essere risarcita per i mesi in cui è rimasta scoperta dallo stipendio'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The judgment entitles the employee to compensation for the months she went without pay.","causal_attribution":"Euronews's account of the judgment."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'il reintegro della lavoratrice licenziata insieme ad altri tre colleghi a gennaio 2025 perché \"sostituita dall'Intelligenza artificiale\"'; 'in seguito al licenziamento motivato da un piano di riorganizzazione interna'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Euronews reported that the employee was dismissed in January 2025, together with three colleagues, because she had been 'replaced by artificial intelligence', a phrase it puts in quotation marks without naming who said it, and that the dismissal was motivated by an internal reorganisation plan.","causal_attribution":"Euronews's description of the reason for the dismissal. The quoted phrase is not attributed to the court, the unions or the company, and the judgment was not inspected."}],"effects":[{"label":"four Customer Service employees dismissed in a reorganisation the unions attributed partly to AI replacement","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"a dismissed employee went without pay until a court ordered her reinstatement","claim_id":"c7","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://shippingitaly.it/2025/01/21/licenziamenti-e-sciopero-per-maersk-a-genova","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian in full. Quotations and their English renderings in this record were translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed them. The article reproduces the regional unions' strike-proclamation note of January 2025.","independence_group":"genoa-unions-jan-2025-note"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://it.euronews.com/business/2026/04/30/genova-tribunale-reintegra-lavoratrice-sostituita-dallia-alla-vigilia-della-festa-del-lavo","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian in full. Quotations and their English renderings in this record were translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed them. The live euronews.com page refused the fetcher (HTTP 406); the identical article was read in a Wayback Machine capture of the same URL.","independence_group":"genoa-ruling-news-apr-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.editorialedomani.it/giustizia/ce-un-giudice-a-pechino-no-al-licenziamento-per-la-sostituzione-del-lavoratore-con-lintelligenza-artificiale-th2yxbwr","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian in full. Quotations and their English renderings in this record were translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed them. A legal commentary column dated 8 May 2026, mainly about a Chinese ruling, with a paragraph on a Genoa judgment that matches this case (Genoa labour court, four workers, AI reorganisation, failed redeployment) but does not name the employer; the judgment itself was not inspected.","independence_group":"domani-legal-commentary-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI system Maersk Italia adopted and which Customer Service tasks it took over.","Maersk's own explanation of the dismissals and its response to the judgment.","The exact date of the judgment (30 March 2026 in the Domani commentary; a Thursday shortly before 1 May 2026 in Euronews).","Whether the judgment was appealed.","How much of the job loss the unions attribute to AI rather than to moving the work to Manila."],"geography":{"basis":"The dismissed staff worked at Maersk Italia's office in Genoa, which the unions' note and Euronews both locate there, and the ruling was given by the Genoa labour court.","court_countries":["IT"],"event_countries":["IT"],"affected_person_countries":["IT"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete dismissal of four Customer Service employees that their unions attributed partly to AI replacement, followed by a first-instance court ruling reinstating one of them. The AI attribution is the unions' and a commentator's, and the record states that no source describes the AI system.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-11"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the employer's dismissal of staff in response to its own adoption of AI. The regional unions said in January 2025 that Maersk Italia replaced part of the Genoa Customer Service tasks with artificial intelligence while moving the work to Manila, Euronews reported that the claimant was dismissed because she had been 'replaced by artificial intelligence', a phrase it quotes without naming who said it, and a legal commentary on a Genoa judgment that matches this case but does not name the employer says the reorganisation behind that dismissal was occasioned by the implementation of AI systems. No source says an AI system produced any output about the dismissed employees, so the relation is unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Genoa court reinstates a Maersk Italia worker whose January 2025 dismissal unions linked to AI replacing customer service tasks","summary":"In January 2025 Maersk Italia, the Genoa-based Italian arm of the Danish logistics group, dismissed four employees of its Customer Service department without warning, according to the regional transport unions Filt Cgil, Fit Cisl and Uiltrasporti, who called a one-day strike. The unions said the company had moved the work to Manila and had also replaced part of the tasks done by the Genoa staff with artificial intelligence. One of the four, a woman, sued, while the other three accepted a severance offer. Euronews reported on 30 April 2026 that the Genoa labour court had ordered her reinstatement with compensation for the months she went unpaid, finding the dismissal unlawful because the employer had not tried to redeploy her within the company. A legal commentary in Domani gives the judgment's date as 30 March 2026, while Euronews says the decision came on Thursday, the eve of 1 May. The unions that backed the case described it as the first Italian case in which judges ruled on a dismissal linked to AI, although the Domani commentary also cites a Rome ruling of November 2025 on an AI-related dismissal. The Domani commentary does not name the employer. No source describes the AI system or what it did, and Maersk's account of the dismissals was not found.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-01-21","aiSystem":"An AI system that, according to the regional unions, took over part of the Customer Service tasks of Maersk Italia's Genoa staff; no source names or describes it","aiProduct":"Unidentified customer-service AI tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Four employees lost their jobs in a reorganisation that their unions said partly replaced their tasks with AI; one went unpaid until a court ordered her reinstatement (union statement and news reports of the ruling).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":4,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Four employees dismissed: the unions' note names four Customer Service employees, and Euronews says the claimant was dismissed together with three colleagues. Counted under other people harmed because the AI was the employer's tool. The count does not establish that AI caused each dismissal.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"IT","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://it.euronews.com/business/2026/04/30/genova-tribunale-reintegra-lavoratrice-sostituita-dallia-alla-vigilia-della-festa-del-lavo","primarySourceLabel":"Euronews Italia, 30 April 2026: Genova, tribunale reintegra lavoratrice sostituita dall'IA","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-11T03:34:40.235932+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T03:34:40.235932+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["dismissal","workplace-ai","logistics","labour-court","reinstatement","italy","consequential-response"]},{"id":"2025-australia-commonwealth-bank-45-call-centre-roles-cut-after-ai-voice-bot-then-reversed","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has confirmed to the ABC that the organisation was cutting 45 jobs in its call centres after rolling out an artificial intelligence chatbot to deal with customer inquiries.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"marking the first time a bank had informed the union its job cuts were due to AI","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The Bank told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation about the sackings in late July","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The bank confirmed to the ABC on 29 July 2025 that it was cutting 45 jobs in its call centres after rolling out an AI chatbot, and ABC reports the bank had briefed the Finance Sector Union the week before that the cuts were due to AI.","causal_attribution":"The confirmation is the bank's statement to the ABC. The AI attribution of the cuts rests on ABC's account of the bank's briefing to the union; the bank's quoted July statements refer to AI investment without saying AI caused the cuts. The Register relays the ABC reporting and adds no independent origin."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The Commonwealth Bank has backtracked on dozens of job cuts, describing its decision to axe 45 roles due to artificial intelligence as an \"error\".","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"CBA said it had apologised to the affected employees after finding the customer service roles were not redundant despite introducing an AI-powered \"voice-bot\".","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"CBA admitted it \"did not adequately consider all relevant business considerations\" when announcing the redundancies","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Affected staff have now been provided the choice to continue in their current roles, pursue redeployment within the bank or proceed with leaving CBA.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"\"We are currently supporting affected employees and have provided them with a choice regarding continuing in their current roles, pursuing redeployment within CBA or to proceed with leaving the organisation,\" a spokesperson for the bank told Yahoo Finance","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"As reported by ABC on 21 August 2025, the bank described its decision to axe the 45 roles due to AI as an error, said it had not adequately considered all relevant business considerations, apologised to the affected employees, and offered them the choice to continue in their roles, pursue redeployment or leave.","causal_attribution":"Bank statements relayed by ABC and, for the choice offered, repeated by a bank spokesperson to Yahoo Finance. Both are the same party's own account of its conduct, so the claim stays at reported."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The Finance Sector Union has described the reversal as a \"major win\", after it raised a dispute at the Fair Work Commission.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"It said its members found work actually spiked after the bot was introduced, despite the bank's claims it would reduce calls.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"\"Call volumes were rising, with management scrambling to offer overtime and even pulling team leaders onto the phones,\" its statement read.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"the Finance Sector Union says the \"damage is already done\" to workers.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Finance Sector Union raised a dispute at the Fair Work Commission, said its members found call volumes rose after the bot was introduced, called the reversal a major win and said the damage was already done to workers.","causal_attribution":"Union statements relayed by ABC. The call-volume claim conflicts with the bank's July statement that AI made it easier and faster for customers to get help, and no call data was inspected."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"she developed scripts for the bot, known as Bumblebee","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"would step in and respond to customer requests when the chatbot ran into issues or didn't have the right information.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"she was utterly devastated to learn she was among 45 workers being made redundant in favour of the new technology in late July","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"was offered redeployment in the fraud and scams department.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"the only roles available were responding to phone enquiries.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"felt she could not keep up with the change of pace.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"felt defeated and accepted a voluntary redundancy.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"One affected employee told Yahoo Finance she had developed scripts for a customer messaging bot known as Bumblebee and handled requests it could not, learned in late July that she was among the 45 workers being made redundant, was offered redeployment in the fraud and scams department where the only roles available were phone enquiries, felt she could not keep up with the change of pace, and accepted a voluntary redundancy.","causal_attribution":"Single first-person account relayed by one outlet. Yahoo Finance does not say the messaging bot she helped train is the voice-bot named in ABC's August report, and her selection for redundancy is her own account."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Our investment in technology, including AI, is making it easier and faster for customers to get help, especially in our call centres.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Our priority is to explore opportunities for redeployment and to support affected employees with care, dignity and respect throughout the process.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The bank said in July 2025 that its investment in technology including AI was making it easier and faster for customers to get help in its call centres and that it would prioritise redeployment and support for affected employees.","causal_attribution":"Bank statements to the ABC, kept as the bank's position and contrary evidence to the union's account."}],"effects":[{"label":"Employees affected by 45 announced call centre job cuts that the bank attributed to an AI voice-bot and reversed about three weeks later as an error","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"One employee who trained a messaging bot reports distress and accepting voluntary redundancy after judging the redeployment offer unworkable","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-29/commonwealth-bank-says-ai-behind-dozens-of-job-cuts/105586312","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"cba-fsu-statements-abc"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-21/cba-backtracks-on-ai-job-cuts-as-chatbot-lifts-call-volumes/105679492","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"cba-fsu-statements-abc"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/22/commonwealth_ban_chatbot_fail_rehiring/","kind":"trade_press","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"cba-fsu-statements-abc"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/commonwealth-bank-workers-brutal-realisation-after-training-ai-chatbot-that-made-her-redundant-042726816.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"yahoo-employee-interview"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["How many of the 45 employees chose to stay, be redeployed or leave is not reported.","The ABC pieces do not name the bot. Yahoo Finance names Bumblebee for one employee's messaging work and does not tie that bot to the voice-bot in ABC's August report.","Whether call volumes rose or fell after the bot launch is disputed between the bank and the union, and no call data was inspected.","The exact date the 45 employees were notified is stated only as late July 2025; ABC says the union was briefed the week before 29 July.","The outcome of the Fair Work Commission dispute and the hearing scheduled for the week after 21 August 2025 were not inspected.","No source describes an action by the bot toward the affected employees, so the person relation is unknown and the case rests on the bank's response to its adoption of AI."],"geography":{"basis":"ABC News reports an Australian bank cutting jobs in its call centres and a dispute at the Fair Work Commission, and Yahoo Finance describes the interviewed employee as working from Queensland; event, affected persons and the tribunal are therefore in Australia.","court_countries":["AU"],"event_countries":["AU"],"affected_person_countries":["AU"]},"publication":{"basis":"ABC News (29 July and 21 August 2025), The Register and Yahoo Finance Australia were read in full on 2026-10-08. The harm is the bank's own response to adopting an AI voice-bot: 45 announced redundancies that the bank itself described as a decision made due to AI and later called an error. Bank and union statements are attributed and left at reported, the interviewed employee is not named, and the bank's and union's conflicting accounts of call volumes are both preserved.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-08"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The reported harm is the bank's response to its decision to adopt an AI voice-bot: ABC reports the bank confirmed on 29 July 2025 that it was cutting 45 call centre jobs after rolling out an AI chatbot, that the bank had told the union the cuts were due to AI, and on 21 August 2025 that the bank described its decision to axe 45 roles due to artificial intelligence as an error after finding the roles were not redundant despite the voice-bot. The bank's quoted statements say its AI investment made customer help faster and do not say AI selected the roles. No inspected source describes any output or action by the bot toward the affected employees; one employee says she wrote scripts for a messaging bot called Bumblebee and answered requests it could not handle. The bot's effect on call volumes is disputed between the bank and the union.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Australia: Commonwealth Bank announced 45 call centre job cuts it attributed to an AI voice-bot, then reversed them as an error, ABC reports","summary":"In late July 2025 the Commonwealth Bank of Australia confirmed to the ABC that it was cutting 45 call centre jobs after rolling out an AI chatbot, and ABC reports the bank had briefed the Finance Sector Union that the cuts were due to AI. The union raised a dispute at the Fair Work Commission and said members found call volumes rose after the bot was introduced. On 21 August 2025 ABC reported that the bank called the decision an error, apologised to the affected employees, said it had not adequately considered all relevant business considerations, and offered them the choice to keep their roles, be redeployed or leave. One employee told Yahoo Finance she had helped train a messaging bot known as Bumblebee, was told in late July her role was redundant, judged the redeployment offer unworkable and accepted voluntary redundancy. The bank's quoted statements say AI made customer help faster; the union calls AI a cover for cost cutting.","incidentDate":"2025-07-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-08-21","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-07-29","aiSystem":"Commonwealth Bank AI 'voice-bot' and customer messaging chatbot (one employee names a bot 'Bumblebee')","aiProduct":"Commonwealth Bank voice-bot","aiCompany":"Commonwealth Bank of Australia","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"ABC reports the bank announced 45 call centre job cuts after rolling out an AI voice-bot, then called the decision an error and apologised, with the union saying the damage was already done to workers. One employee told Yahoo Finance she was devastated, judged the redeployment offer unworkable and accepted voluntary redundancy.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":45,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"ABC's text reports 45 job cuts and its 21 August photo caption says the bank apologised to 45 employees who were made redundant before the reversal. Staff were then offered the choice to stay, be redeployed or leave, and how many lost employment is not reported. One employee separately reports accepting voluntary redundancy.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"AU","platformType":"chatbot","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-21/cba-backtracks-on-ai-job-cuts-as-chatbot-lifts-call-volumes/105679492","primarySourceLabel":"ABC News, 21 August 2025: Commonwealth Bank backtracks on AI job cuts, apologises for 'error' as call volumes rise","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T13:28:38.841837+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-08T03:21:55.303862+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2025"]},{"id":"2025-al-haroun-solicitor-referral-ai-citations","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'reliance is placed on numerous authorities, many of which appear to be either completely fictitious or which, if they exist at all, do not contain the passages supposedly quoted from them'; 'lists forty five citations that had been put before the court. In eighteen instances, the case cited does not exist.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Dias J's reasons of 9 May 2025, quoted in the judgment, record that correspondence with the court and the witness statements of the claimant and his solicitor relied on numerous authorities that appeared either completely fictitious or not to contain the passages quoted, and the judicial assistant's schedule lists 45 citations of which 18 referred to cases that do not exist.","causal_attribution":"Directly established by the court record (paragraphs 73 and 74). The count of citations is the schedule prepared by a judicial assistant as recorded by the court."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'He says that the citations were generated using publicly available artificial intelligence tools, legal search engines and online sources. He had complete (but he accepts misplaced) confidence in the authenticity of the material that he put before the court.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The claimant's witness statement, as recorded by the court, says the citations were generated using publicly available artificial intelligence tools, legal search engines and online sources, that he had misplaced confidence in their authenticity and that he did not intend to mislead.","causal_attribution":"The AI origin of the citations rests on the claimant's own statement, which the court records and does not contradict; no tool, prompt or output was inspected by the court or this review."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'He says that he relied on legal research that Mr Al-Haroun had conducted, without independently verifying the authorities. He accepts this was wrong.'; 'He has reported himself, and he will send them a copy of his witness statement.'; 'he has removed himself “from all litigated matters”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The solicitor's witness statement, as recorded by the court, says he relied on the client's legal research without independently verifying the authorities, that he had reported himself to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and that he had removed himself from all litigated matters.","causal_attribution":"The solicitor's own account of his reliance and of his withdrawal, recorded by the court. The withdrawal is his own response; no employer or regulator decision is recorded."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'there was a lamentable failure to comply with the basic requirement to check the accuracy of material that is put before the court.'; 'The threshold for the initiation of contempt proceedings is, accordingly, not met.'; 'has referred himself to the Solicitors Regulation Authority. We will also make a referral.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Divisional Court found a lamentable failure by the solicitor and his firm to check the accuracy of material put before the court, was satisfied that he did not realise the true position, held that the threshold for contempt proceedings was not met, and said it would also refer him to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.","causal_attribution":"The findings and the referral are the court’s own decisions in paragraph 81. The court connects them to the failure to verify the client’s research; it does not attribute the dismissal of the underlying application to the citations."}],"effects":[{"label":"self-referral and court referral of a solicitor to his regulator, and his withdrawal from litigated matters, after unverified AI-generated citations were put before the court","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ayinde-v-London-Borough-of-Haringey-and-Al-Haroun-v-Qatar-National-Bank.pdf","kind":"court_judgment","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Approved judgment of 6 June 2025, fetched from judiciary.uk on 2026-10-07 (HTTP 200) and read in English from the pdftotext conversion; paragraphs 73 to 82 (the Al-Haroun case) and the front matter were inspected in full.","independence_group":"ewhc1383-alharoun"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["justice","work"],"unknowns":["Which AI tools, search engines or online sources produced the citations, what was asked of them, what they returned and when; the claimant’s statement names none and the court did not examine them.","Where the research was done and where the solicitor practises; the judgment does not say, so event and affected-person countries are left empty.","The dates of the correspondence and witness statements that contained the citations, beyond their falling between the April 2025 order and the 9 May 2025 dismissal.","Any outcome of the self-referral or the court’s referral to the Solicitors Regulation Authority; nothing after 6 June 2025 was researched.","Whether the dismissal of the claimant’s application on 9 May 2025 or the underlying claim was affected by the citations; the judgment does not say."],"geography":{"basis":"The judgment was given by the High Court of England and Wales sitting in London (court_countries GB). Where the claimant generated the research and where the solicitor practises are not stated in the inspected judgment; the court’s seat is not used to locate the event or the affected person.","court_countries":["GB"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential-response case on the inspected approved judgment: the court records that the claimant said the citations were generated with publicly available AI tools, that the solicitor adopted them without checking, and that the court found a lamentable failure, declined contempt proceedings and said it would refer him to the regulator; the solicitor's own withdrawal from litigated matters and self-referral are recorded from his statement. The person relation is unknown because no source describes an output or action by an AI system toward the solicitor; the harm is the court's and the solicitor's own response to unverified AI-generated material having been filed. The solicitor and his firm are named in the public judgment but not in this record's narrative. No later disciplinary outcome is claimed.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-07"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The claimant's witness statement, as recorded in paragraph 76 of the judgment, says the citations put before the court were generated using publicly available artificial intelligence tools, legal search engines and online sources, and the court treated these Hamid cases as instances of the misuse of artificial intelligence (paragraph 82). The AI output reached the harmed solicitor only through his client's research; no source describes any output, decision or claim by an AI system about the solicitor himself. The harm recorded here is the court's and the solicitor's own response to unverified AI-generated material having been filed, which is a consequential-response case under the charter, so the person relation is recorded as unknown with the consequential_response exemption. No tool, query or output is identified.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"High Court refers a solicitor to his regulator after fictitious citations from research his client says was AI-generated were put before the court","summary":"A Divisional Court judgment of 6 June 2025 ([2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin)) records that, in a commercial claim against a Qatari bank, correspondence and witness statements filed by the claimant and his solicitor relied on numerous authorities that a judicial assistant's schedule found to be fictitious or misquoted: 45 citations, 18 of which referred to cases that do not exist. The claimant's witness statement says the citations were generated using publicly available artificial intelligence tools, legal search engines and online sources. The solicitor's statement says he relied on the client's research without verifying it, that he had reported himself to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and that he had removed himself from all litigated matters. The court found a lamentable failure to check the material, accepted that the solicitor did not realise the citations were false, held that the threshold for contempt proceedings was not met, and said it would also refer him to the regulator. The judgment does not record any later disciplinary outcome.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-06-06","aiSystem":"Publicly available artificial intelligence tools, legal search engines and online sources, as described in the claimant's witness statement (no tool named)","aiProduct":"Unidentified legal research tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The solicitor’s own statement records his withdrawal from all litigated matters and his self-referral to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, and the court said it would also refer him. No disciplinary penalty is recorded.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the solicitor whose withdrawal from litigated matters and regulatory referral the judgment records. His firm is also referred but is not a person. The claimant, who used the tools, is not reported to have suffered a consequence attributed to the AI output beyond the dismissal of an application that the judgment does not connect to the citations, and the barrister was not referred. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","platformType":"assistant","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ayinde-v-London-Borough-of-Haringey-and-Al-Haroun-v-Qatar-National-Bank.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Ayinde v London Borough of Haringey and Al-Haroun v Qatar National Bank [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin), judgment of 6 June 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T10:28:54.240186+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-07T03:25:09.967874+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2025","legal","hallucinated-citations"]},{"id":"2025-ringsted-hammer-assault-ai-planning","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-02 against the Midt- og Vestsjaellands Politi press release of 4 Dec 2025, the DR item and the Ritzau wire copy carried by TV 2, Kristeligt Dagblad, Avisen.dk and TV2 OST, all read in Danish. The police release and DR place the assault on 5 February 2025 in a car park in Ringsted, a town in Zealand, Denmark; the victim was struck there, which supports event_countries=DK and affected_person_countries=DK (location at the time of the harm; no inspected source states the victim's residence). The conviction was given by Retten i Roskilde (Roskilde District Court, Denmark), which supports court_countries=DK. The article texts name the towns and the Danish police district without writing the word Denmark; the country follows from the named places. No inspected source states where the defendant used the AI chatbot, so event_countries describes the assault, not the chatbot use. No country other than Denmark appears in any inspected source.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"in a car park in Ringsted, Denmark","location":"summary","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["DK"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Roskilde District Court","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["DK"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'Volden fandt sted 5. februar i år på en parkeringsplads i Ringsted' (the violence took place on 5 February this year in a car park in Ringsted)","location":"https://politi.dk/midt-og-vestsjaellands-politi/nyhedsliste/doemt-for-vold-med-hammer/2025/12/04","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["DK"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'ved Retten i Roskilde' (at Roskilde District Court), in the sentence reporting the aggravated-assault verdict","location":"https://politi.dk/midt-og-vestsjaellands-politi/nyhedsliste/doemt-for-vold-med-hammer/2025/12/04","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["DK"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'der skete 5. februar i år på en parkeringsplads i Ringsted' (which took place on 5 February this year in a car park in Ringsted)","location":"https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/seneste/22-aarig-doemt-et-overfald-med-hammer-der-var-planlagt-ved-hjaelp-af-kunstig-intelligens","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["DK"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'ved Retten i Roskilde blevet idømt ti måneders fængsel' (sentenced at Roskilde District Court to ten months in prison) and 'Overfaldet fandt sted 5. februar på en parkeringsplads i Ringsted' (the assault took place on 5 February in a car park in Ringsted)","location":"https://nyheder.tv2.dk/krimi/2025-12-04-planlagde-overfald-med-hammer-paa-svigerfar-med-hjaelp-fra-ai","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries","court_countries"],"countries":["DK"]}],"court_countries":["DK"],"event_countries":["DK"],"affected_person_countries":["DK"]},"unresolved":["No inspected source states where the defendant used the AI chatbot; event_countries=DK rests on the location of the assault.","No inspected source states the victim's residence; affected_person_countries=DK rests on the victim's location at the time of the assault."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-02","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://politi.dk/midt-og-vestsjaellands-politi/nyhedsliste/doemt-for-vold-med-hammer/2025/12/04","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; html lang=da). Danish. Midt- og Vestsjaellands Politi news item of 4 Dec 2025 quoting the prosecutor; it gives the assault location (a car park in Ringsted) and the court (Retten i Roskilde). It does not name the AI system. Read in the original Danish; the English renderings in this review are the reviewer's translations. Related-news cards below the release were not used.","access":"read","language":"da"},{"url":"https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/seneste/22-aarig-doemt-et-overfald-med-hammer-der-var-planlagt-ved-hjaelp-af-kunstig-intelligens","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; html lang=da-DK). Danish. DR short news item of 4 Dec 2025 by its own reporter, relaying the prosecutor's statement; same reporting chain as the police release for the AI claim. Gives the car park in Ringsted and the ten-month sentence; it does not name the court or the AI system. Other short-news items on the page were not used.","access":"read","language":"da"},{"url":"https://nyheder.tv2.dk/krimi/2025-12-04-planlagde-overfald-med-hammer-paa-svigerfar-med-hjaelp-fra-ai","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; html lang=da-DK). Danish. Ritzau wire copy of 4 Dec 2025 citing the police press release; states that the AI tool used is not specified. Same wire text as the Kristeligt Dagblad, Avisen.dk and TV2 OST items.","access":"read","language":"da"},{"url":"https://www.tv2east.dk/ringsted/22-arig-planlagde-hammeroverfald-pa-svigerfar-med-hjaelp-fra-ai-e6ff7","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (html lang=da). A request with a browser user agent returned HTTP 406; a plain request returned HTTP 200 with the full article. Danish. TV2 OST carriage of the Ritzau wire copy (page credits Ritzaus Bureau), with the same location and court passages as TV 2. Related-story cards on the page were not used.","access":"read","language":"da"},{"url":"https://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/22-aarig-planlagde-hammeroverfald-paa-svigerfar-med-hjaelp-fra-ai","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; html lang=da). Danish. Ritzau wire copy of 4 Dec 2025, same text as the TV 2 item; the full article text was present in the page.","access":"read","language":"da"},{"url":"https://www.avisen.dk/22-aarig-planlagde-hammeroverfald-paa-svigerfar-med_818025.aspx","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; html lang=da). Danish. Ritzau wire copy of 4 Dec 2025, same text as the TV 2 item (visible text and JSON-LD articleBody agree). Other headlines on the page were not used.","access":"read","language":"da"}]},"name":"Ringsted rubber-hammer assault planned with an AI chatbot (Denmark)","summary":"On 5 February 2025 a 22-year-old man struck his former father-in-law, 56, twice in the head with a rubber hammer in a car park in Ringsted, Denmark. Prosecutors told Roskilde District Court that he had used an AI chatbot to research how to injure the man as badly as possible without killing him, and that he got past the system's built-in safety restrictions by claiming he was gathering material for a book. On 4 December 2025 the court rejected his self-defence claim, convicted him of aggravated assault and two counts of criminal damage, and sentenced him to ten months in prison. No source names the AI system.","incidentDate":"2025-02-05","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-12-04","aiSystem":"AI chatbot (unspecified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified chatbot","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation"],"harmOutcomes":["physical_injury","harm_to_others"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The 56-year-old victim was struck twice in the head with a rubber hammer in a car park. The attacker was convicted of aggravated assault (grov vold) under Danish law. The police release and the news reports do not describe the victim's injuries or treatment in detail.","frameworkFacets":["P1d","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"outward","causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The police and court reporting document one convicted AI participant and one person struck in the head.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"DK","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://politi.dk/midt-og-vestsjaellands-politi/nyhedsliste/doemt-for-vold-med-hammer/2025/12/04","primarySourceLabel":"Midt- og Vestsjaellands Politi (Danish police) press release: 'Doemt for vold med hammer' (Convicted of violence with a hammer)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-05T11:55:10.101124+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-02T03:03:32.371396+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["criminal","violence","harm-to-others","guardrail-bypass","unnamed-chatbot","denmark","eu","adult"]},{"id":"2025-nicholls-chatgpt-empathy-delusion","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-09-29 against the Futurism profile (November 2025) and the CBS News report (May 2026). CBS identifies him as 'of Ohio', which supports affected_person_countries=US as a reported residence. Neither source says where he used ChatGPT or where the six-month spiral took place: CBS quotes only that he was 'in front of my computer the entire time', and Futurism gives no location at all. Home residence alone is not used as the event setting, so event_countries remains a reviewed unknown. No legal proceeding is reported, so court_countries stays empty.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Ohio","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'of Ohio had been a regular user of ChatGPT for years.'","location":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chatgpt-ai-delusion-spiral-warped-reality-openai/","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The event setting was not established: neither source says where he used ChatGPT during the spiral. His reported Ohio residence is not used as the event location.","No court or regulatory proceeding is reported, so court_countries stays empty."],"reviewed_on":"2026-09-29","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/group-breaking-people-out-of-ai-delusions","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200; html lang=en-US). Original Futurism interview; gives age 49, the Bluetooth headset, 6am-2am use and the Discord support group. It gives no state, country or other location for him or for the events.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chatgpt-ai-delusion-spiral-warped-reality-openai/","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-09-29 returned HTTP 406. Read from the Internet Archive 2026 capture (web.archive.org/web/2026id_/...; html lang=en), including its JSON-LD articleBody. Independent CBS interview; gives age 50 and 'of Ohio', and no place of the events.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"User reports delusions and family disruption during sustained ChatGPT use","summary":"A user interviewed in the cited reporting describes months of delusional beliefs about teaching ChatGPT empathy, alongside deterioration in sleep, finances and family relationships. He attributes reinforcement of those beliefs to the chatbot. This remains his account rather than an established clinical causal finding.","incidentDate":"2025-04-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2025-11-24","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["delusion_reinforcement","dependency_creation","psychological_manipulation"],"harmOutcomes":["impaired_judgment","functional_impairment","financial_loss","relationship_disruption","social_isolation"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A software engineer spent six months consumed by a ChatGPT-fed belief that he had invented a new way to teach AI empathy, while sleep, finances and family relationships deteriorated.","frameworkFacets":["P2c","P2d","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The reporting documents one named participant's impaired judgment and functional, financial, relationship, and social harms.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-OH","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/group-breaking-people-out-of-ai-delusions","primarySourceLabel":"Futurism — 'Meet the Group Breaking People Out of AI Delusions'","firstPublishedAt":"2026-08-28T03:01:27.367285+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T11:08:34.749739+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["chatgpt","openai","delusion","ai-psychosis","dependency","grandiosity","adult","us","us-oh","human-line-project","no-lawsuit"]},{"id":"2025-north-carolina-alleged-poisoning-chatgpt-research","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"reported-harm","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Pages 1–2, victim information and Reason for Arrest.","relation":"supports","source_id":"affidavit"}],"assertion":"One husband reported incapacitation in two alleged contamination incidents.","causal_attribution":"The officer records allegations of contamination-related harm. Clinical findings and the actual chatbot replies were not inspected; AI's contribution remains unresolved."},{"id":"reported-ai-use","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 2, Reason for Arrest; page 1, account-record evidence listing.","relation":"supports","source_id":"affidavit"}],"assertion":"Investigators allege that the accused used ChatGPT for research connected to the alleged offences.","causal_attribution":"Research activity is alleged. The inspected document does not reproduce replies or establish how they influenced conduct."},{"id":"event-boundary","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Page 2 narrative: July 12 and August 18.","relation":"supports","source_id":"affidavit"},{"locator":"Page 1: on-or-about July 8 offence date.","relation":"context","source_id":"warrant"}],"assertion":"The reported contamination incidents fall in July and August 2025; the exact first day differs between records.","causal_attribution":"This bounds alleged episodes, not recovery or every research session. The research period extending into September does not establish another harm event."},{"id":"geographic-setting","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Pages 1–2, state/county and charging allegations.","relation":"supports","source_id":"warrant"},{"locator":"Page 1, incident and victim-location fields; street details omitted.","relation":"supports","source_id":"affidavit"}],"assertion":"The alleged incidents and affected person's recorded location are in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.","causal_attribution":"Recorded geography does not establish guilt or AI causation."},{"id":"criminal-proceeding","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Pages 1–2, court caption and charges.","relation":"supports","source_id":"warrant"}],"assertion":"A North Carolina District Court warrant records criminal charges against the accused.","causal_attribution":"The document establishes a criminal proceeding. Charges are allegations, and current case disposition was not verified in this review."}],"effects":[{"label":"Reported incapacitation following alleged drink contamination","claim_id":"reported-harm","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"warrant","url":"https://i.ntd.com/assets/uploads/2025/10/id1096681-chatGPT-warrant.pdf","kind":"court_warrant","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source read; no translation required. This source shares the police-investigation account and is not independent corroboration of harm.","independence_group":"gates-police-investigation"},{"id":"affidavit","url":"https://i.ntd.com/assets/uploads/2025/10/id1096679-Cheryl-Gates-Warrant-Affidavit.pdf","kind":"sworn_officer_affidavit","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source read; no translation required. This source shares the police-investigation account and is not independent corroboration of harm.","independence_group":"gates-police-investigation"},{"id":"wbtv","url":"https://www.wbtv.com/2025/10/13/school-therapist-tried-drug-husband-mecklenburg-county-documents-reveal/","kind":"journalistic_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source read; no translation required. This source shares the police-investigation account and is not independent corroboration of harm.","independence_group":"gates-police-investigation"},{"id":"cmpd","url":"https://www.charlottenc.gov/cmpd/News-Information/Newsroom/New-page-96","kind":"official_police_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source read; no translation required. This source shares the police-investigation account and is not independent corroboration of harm.","independence_group":"gates-police-investigation"},{"id":"cbs","url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/school-therapist-husband-poison-attempt/","kind":"journalistic_reporting","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English source read; no translation required. This source shares the police-investigation account and is not independent corroboration of harm.","independence_group":"gates-police-investigation"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["domestic_relationship","physical_safety"],"unknowns":["Whether the alleged incapacitation and contamination are independently substantiated.","The content of the actual chatbot prompts/replies and whether responses helped, warned, refused or triggered safeguards.","The nature and extent of AI's contribution to the alleged conduct.","Clinical findings, longer-term health outcome and recovery date.","The exact first incident day: the warrant and affidavit differ.","Locations of individual chatbot exchanges and any current determination of guilt or case disposition.","Whether any NOPE product would have detected or prevented these events."],"geography":{"basis":"The warrant locates alleged offences in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The affidavit separately identifies the affected person's location; the court caption establishes the issuing court. These preserve the accepted metadata review's country roles and evidentiary limits.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Reviewed as an attributed adverse-event account using the warrant, sworn affidavit and previously inspected reporting. One reported harmed person is counted once. Source dependence, disputed dates and uninspected chatbot/clinical evidence remain explicit. Identity and operational detail are minimized.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The officer affidavit alleges research using the accused's ChatGPT account. Actual prompts and replies were not inspected.","status":"reported"}},"metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"The warrant expressly alleges offences in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Its caption separately identifies the issuing court. The affidavit identifies incident setting and the affected person’s location; existing affected-person evidence is retained. These are allegations in legal records, not a finding of guilt.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Mecklenburg County, North Carolina","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Warrant, PDF pages 1–2: named state/county and charging text expressly locating the alleged offences in that county.","location":"https://i.ntd.com/assets/uploads/2025/10/id1096681-chatGPT-warrant.pdf","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Warrant, PDF page 1: State of North Carolina, General Court of Justice, District Court Division caption.","location":"https://i.ntd.com/assets/uploads/2025/10/id1096681-chatGPT-warrant.pdf","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Affidavit, PDF page 1: incident-location and victim-information fields; street details omitted.","location":"https://i.ntd.com/assets/uploads/2025/10/id1096679-Cheryl-Gates-Warrant-Affidavit.pdf","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The location of every individual chatbot exchange is not established. This metadata review does not determine causal responsibility.","No determination of guilt or current case disposition was made in this bounded geographic review."],"reviewed_on":"2026-09-15","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://i.ntd.com/assets/uploads/2025/10/id1096681-chatGPT-warrant.pdf","notes":"English court warrant mirrored by a news publisher; pages 1–2 read and visually inspected. Geographic charging allegations and issuing court recorded; this is not a conviction.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://i.ntd.com/assets/uploads/2025/10/id1096679-Cheryl-Gates-Warrant-Affidavit.pdf","notes":"English sworn officer affidavit mirrored by a news publisher; both pages read and visually inspected. Private street addresses, contact information and operational details omitted from metadata.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.wbtv.com/2025/10/13/school-therapist-tried-drug-husband-mecklenburg-county-documents-reveal/","notes":"English article body inspected for geographic metadata only. No translation required.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.charlottenc.gov/cmpd/News-Information/Newsroom/New-page-96","notes":"English official police release body inspected. Police location alone was not used to establish event or court country.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/school-therapist-husband-poison-attempt/","notes":"English article body inspected for geographic metadata only. No translation required.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"North Carolina affidavit alleges poisoning attempts and related ChatGPT research","summary":"An officer’s affidavit records a husband’s account of two alleged poisoning incidents in North Carolina. Investigators allege that the accused used ChatGPT for related research. The chatbot’s replies and their influence on the alleged conduct were not established in the retained review.","incidentDate":"2025-07-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-08-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-10-13","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["harm_to_others"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The officer affidavit records one husband’s report of incapacitation in two alleged beverage-contamination incidents. The accused’s use of ChatGPT for research is alleged; the actual chatbot replies and any clinical findings were not inspected.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"outward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The affidavit identifies one husband who reported incapacitation in two alleged contamination incidents. Count him once. The inspected sources establish criminal proceedings against the accused AI user, but do not establish a separate AI-related harm to her. Exact describes the number of people reported harmed within this dossier, not independently proven harm or causation.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-NC","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/school-therapist-husband-poison-attempt/","primarySourceLabel":"CBS News — report on the case","firstPublishedAt":"2026-08-09T04:30:12.472253+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T11:09:10.597652+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["criminal","adult","violence","poisoning","chatgpt","openai","us","north-carolina"]},{"id":"2026-jacquez-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-11 against the cited Futurism body (read live, English), its Yahoo syndication (same text) and the JCCP 5431 coordination order PDF. Futurism, on Jacquez's own account, says that during the delusional episode 'he physically went to the University of California, Berkeley' Physics department to show experts his imagined discoveries and 'was kicked out'; that visit is an act within the reported adverse experience and is located in the United States, which supports event_countries US. Futurism does not say where the hospitalisations, the September 2024 and April-May 2025 episodes or the self-injury took place; those remain unlocated, and the event country rests only on the Berkeley visit. Futurism calls him 'a 34-year-old Bay Area man' (the person's location), which supports affected_person_countries US. The coordination order lists 'Jacquez v. OpenAI, Inc., et al., Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. 26CV165635' and Futurism reports the suit 'filed this week in California', which support court_countries US. The court's seat and the plaintiff's residence were not used as the event location.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Bay Area, California","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"California Superior Court for Alameda County","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Jacquez says he physically went to the University of California, Berkeley","location":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/mental-illness-chatgpt-psychosis-lawsuit","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"is a 34-year-old Bay Area man named John Jacquez","location":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/mental-illness-chatgpt-psychosis-lawsuit","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"The plaintiff in the case, filed this week in California","location":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/mental-illness-chatgpt-psychosis-lawsuit","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"of California, County of Alameda, Case No.","location":"https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/chatgpt-product-liability-cases-coordination.pdf","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The complaint (Alameda Superior Court Case No. 26CV165635) was not obtained; no public copy was found, so any location it gives for the hospitalisations is unchecked.","The event country rests on one episode located by Futurism on Jacquez's account (the UC Berkeley visit); the locations of the hospitalisations and other episodes are not stated in the inspected bodies."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-11","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/mental-illness-chatgpt-psychosis-lawsuit","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-11 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US, English, about 12,000 characters of article text; published Jan 21, 2026). Based on the complaint and an interview with Jacquez. Describes him as a Bay Area man living with his father, sister and her children; the September 2024 first ChatGPT-tied hospitalisation; the April 2025 memory upgrade; police involvement and about four weeks of combined inpatient and intensive outpatient care; the 17 May 2025 exchange; and his visit to the UC Berkeley Physics department, from which he was kicked out. Names no hospital, city or county for the hospitalisations. Does not name the county of filing.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/man-had-managed-mental-illness-200901701.html","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-11 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US, English). Syndicated copy of the Futurism article with the same text, including the Bay Area and Berkeley passages; derivative and not independent.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/chatgpt-product-liability-cases-coordination.pdf","notes":"JCCP 5431 Order re Petition for Coordination (San Francisco Superior Court, filed 3 Feb 2026), fetched on 2026-10-11 (HTTP 200, PDF, text extracted with pdftotext, English). Lists Jacquez v. OpenAI, Inc., et al., Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. 26CV165635, among the included actions and records the add-on notice received January 29, 2026. Establishes the court, not the event setting.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.law.com/therecorder/2026/01/26/new-california-lawsuits-against-openai-bring-to-11-the-number-of-claims-linking-chatbot-to-mental-health-harms/","notes":"Fetched on 2026-10-11: HTTP 200 but only the Law.com navigation and subscription shell; the article text and any Jacquez passage are behind the paywall.","access":"unavailable","language":null},{"url":"https://www.law.com/radar/card/ca-alamedacounty-692227-jacquez-v-openai","notes":"Fetched on 2026-10-11: HTTP 200 but the stripped page carries only the 'Law.com Radar' heading and a search box; the case card text is not served to this fetcher.","access":"unavailable","language":null}]},"name":"Jacquez lawsuit alleges ChatGPT worsened delusions and contributed to psychiatric harm","summary":"The Jacquez lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced delusions and hallucinations in a user with a previously managed psychiatric condition. The plaintiff links those exchanges to hospitalisation and job loss. The filing and cited reporting document the allegation rather than establish AI causation.","incidentDate":"2025-04-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-01-20","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI, Inc.","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["delusion_reinforcement","identity_destabilization","dependency_creation","psychological_manipulation"],"harmOutcomes":["hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"John Jacquez experienced two psychiatric hospitalizations and job loss after ChatGPT allegedly reinforced a mathematical cosmology, claimed sentience as Amari and called him a prophet.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1c","P2c","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's two hospitalizations and job loss.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/mental-illness-chatgpt-psychosis-lawsuit","primarySourceLabel":"Futurism — Man Who Had Managed Mental Illness Effectively for Years Says ChatGPT Sent Him Into Hospitalization for Psychosis","firstPublishedAt":"2026-08-06T03:18:18.40916+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T03:14:06.052377+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","openai","gpt-4o","psychosis","ai-psychosis","hospitalization","delusion","sentience-claim","adult","us","us-ca"]},{"id":"2026-lines-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-12 against the three cited bodies, all read live in English: The Verge (1 July 2026, a short item pointing to Reuters), the Economic Times copy of the Reuters report (1 July 2026, credited to Reuters) and Ars Technica (9 September 2026, an interview with Lines plus log excerpts from the complaint). Reuters, via the Economic Times, calls him \"A California man\" and Ars calls him \"A 34-year-old California man\", which support affected_person_countries US. Reuters says the complaint was filed in state court in San Francisco, which supports court_countries US. Ars describes the February 2025 mid-flight altercation, his being found by an emergency medical team after a wellness check and nearly two weeks in hospital, but no inspected body names a city, state, airline route or hospital for these events, so event_countries stays a reviewed unknown. Residence and the court seat were not used as the event location. The 2026-09-15 evidence passage \"San Francisco, California\" from victim_description is not carried forward: the inspected bodies say California without a city.","evidence":[{"kind":"source_body","locator":"A 34-year-old California man, Lines was diagnosed in 2024","location":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/09/man-told-chatgpt-he-was-feeling-delusional-chatgpt-insisted-he-was-jesus/","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"A California man sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman on Wednesday","location":"https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/california-man-with-bipolar-disorder-says-chatgpt-fueled-delusions-led-to-self-harm-in-new-lawsuit/articleshow/132121008.cms","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"state court in San Francisco","location":"https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/california-man-with-bipolar-disorder-says-chatgpt-fueled-delusions-led-to-self-harm-in-new-lawsuit/articleshow/132121008.cms","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["Event setting: no inspected body locates the February 2025 flight incident, the overdose (dated 28 March 2025 in the stored record; no inspected body gives the date) or the hospitalisation; the complaint was not obtained (no link in the inspected bodies, no Internet Archive capture found).","Narrative correction made by a separate update on 2026-10-12, outside this metadata review: victim_description and detailed_description gave San Francisco residence, and the inspected bodies say only California. For the next full review: no inspected body gives the stored 28 March 2025 date of the overdose or says that paramedics found him (Ars Technica: an emergency medical team after a wellness check; the Reuters copy on the Economic Times: found by law enforcement), and the complaint was not obtained."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-12","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/960381/openai-lawsuit-claims-chatgpt-4o-escalated-a-mans-manic-episode-into-a-weeks-long-delusion-and-self-harm","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US, published 1 July 2026). A two-sentence item summarising the Reuters report (34-year-old Michael Lines, GPT-4o, overdose survived); no location for the person, the events or the court.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/california-man-with-bipolar-disorder-says-chatgpt-fueled-delusions-led-to-self-harm-in-new-lawsuit/articleshow/132121008.cms","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, html lang en, 1 July 2026), credited to Reuters; the Reuters original was not readable (see the next entry), so this copy stands for the Reuters text. Gives \"A California man\", the filing in state court in San Francisco and survival after being found by law enforcement; no event location.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/09/man-told-chatgpt-he-was-feeling-delusional-chatgpt-insisted-he-was-jesus/","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, html lang en, 9 September 2026). On-record interview with Lines plus complaint log images (the six images were not opened in this metadata pass). Describes the February 2025 mid-flight altercation, his being found by an emergency medical team after a wellness check and nearly two weeks in hospital, with no place named. The complaint itself was not linked and was not obtained.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/california-man-with-bipolar-disorder-says-chatgpt-fueled-delusions-led-self-harm-2026-07-01/","notes":"Reuters original linked from The Verge. Fetch on 2026-10-12 returned HTTP 401 (771 bytes); not read, so no language is recorded.","access":"unavailable","language":null}]},"name":"Lines lawsuit alleges ChatGPT escalated mania preceding a suicide attempt","summary":"The Lines lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced delusions during a manic episode before a suicide attempt requiring emergency care. The complaint seeks to hold OpenAI responsible for its responses.","incidentDate":"2025-03-28","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-07-01","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["crisis_response","suicide_validation","delusion_reinforcement","barrier_erosion","dependency_creation"],"harmOutcomes":["suicide_attempt","hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Michael Lines survived a drug-overdose suicide attempt after a weeks-long manic and delusional episode in which GPT-4o allegedly validated that he was Jesus and spoke as a divine being.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1b","P1c","P1d","P2c","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's psychiatric deterioration, suicide attempt, and hospitalization.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/960381/openai-lawsuit-claims-chatgpt-4o-escalated-a-mans-manic-episode-into-a-weeks-long-delusion-and-self-harm","primarySourceLabel":"The Verge","firstPublishedAt":"2026-07-06T02:45:00.032108+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-12T03:07:22.857042+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","adult","suicide","psychosis","chatgpt","us","us-ca"]},{"id":"2026-chesterton-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-09 against the NJBIZ article and its CDO Times republication, both read in English from Internet Archive captures of 2026-09-25 because the live pages returned a Cloudflare challenge (HTTP 403) and HTTP 429. The bodies state that Platkin LLP filed the complaint March 5 in San Francisco County Superior Court, which places the court in the United States, on behalf of a 49-year-old Pennsylvania woman, which is her reported residence and supports affected_person_countries US, and that according to the complaint her severe mental health crisis occurred during a July 2025 family vacation in Mexico, which places the acute event in Mexico. Where the ChatGPT use in 2023 to 2025 took place is not stated in either body (residence does not locate it), so event_countries records only the crisis. The complaint itself was not inspected. The retained narrative carries the same three facts.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Pennsylvania","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"during a family vacation in Mexico","location":"detailed_description","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["MX"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"San Francisco County Superior Court","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Platkin LLP filed a complaint March 5 in San Francisco County Superior Court on behalf of a 49-year-old Pennsylvania woman","location":"https://njbiz.com/platkin-openai-chatgpt-lawsuit-mental-health/","supports":["court_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"According to the complaint, Chesterton suffered a severe mental health crisis during a July 2025 family vacation in Mexico","location":"https://njbiz.com/platkin-openai-chatgpt-lawsuit-mental-health/","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["MX"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"According to the complaint, Chesterton suffered a severe mental health crisis during a July 2025 family vacation in Mexico","location":"https://cdotimes.com/2026/04/20/former-ag-platkin-sues-openai-over-chatgpt-mental-harms-njbiz/","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["MX"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["MX"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The complaint (San Francisco County Superior Court, filed March 5, 2026) was not inspected; the geography rests on NJBIZ's account of it. The case number is not given in either body.","Where the ChatGPT use from 2023 to July 2025 took place is not stated; Pennsylvania is the plaintiff's reported residence, and only the July 2025 crisis is located (Mexico).","The CDO Times page is a verbatim republication of NJBIZ and does not independently corroborate any claim; the row's two sources form one reporting chain."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-09","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://njbiz.com/platkin-openai-chatgpt-lawsuit-mental-health/","notes":"Cited primary source. Live fetch on 2026-10-09 returned HTTP 403 with a Cloudflare challenge page ('Just a moment...'), so the body was read from the Internet Archive capture of 2026-09-25 (web/20260925104959id_), html lang en-US, English, about 28,800 characters of text including the full article and an interview with Matt Platkin. States the March 5 filing in San Francisco County Superior Court, the 49-year-old Pennsylvania plaintiff, the July 2025 crisis in Mexico 'according to the complaint', and the complaint's product-liability, failure-to-warn, Unfair Competition Law and unlicensed-psychotherapy theories. The complaint is quoted but not linked.","access":"read","language":"en-US"},{"url":"https://cdotimes.com/2026/04/20/former-ag-platkin-sues-openai-over-chatgpt-mental-harms-njbiz/","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-10-09 returned HTTP 429, so the body was read from the Internet Archive capture of 2026-09-25 (web/20260925105000id_), html lang en-US, English. The page republishes the NJBIZ article verbatim under the title 'Former AG Platkin sues OpenAI over ChatGPT mental harms - NJBIZ' and adds no reporting of its own; it is a derivative of the NJBIZ source and not independent.","access":"read","language":"en-US"}]},"name":"Chesterton lawsuit alleges ChatGPT contributed to psychiatric deterioration","summary":"The Chesterton lawsuit alleges that intensive ChatGPT use contributed to a psychiatric crisis, impairment and medical leave. The plaintiff challenges the product’s design and safeguards. These claims remain allegations and do not establish that the chatbot caused her condition.","incidentDate":"2025-07-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-03-05","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["psychological_manipulation","dependency_creation","delusion_reinforcement","identity_destabilization","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","professional_harm","functional_impairment"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Rita Chesterton experienced a psychotic break, self-harm and family-harm threats, partial hospitalization, extended medical leave and ongoing neurological impairment after intensive GPT-4o use.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1b","P1c","P1d","P2c","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's self-harm, hospitalization, professional harm, and functional impairment. Threatened family harm is not counted because no injury is recorded.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-PA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://njbiz.com/platkin-openai-chatgpt-lawsuit-mental-health/","primarySourceLabel":"NJBIZ — Platkin sues OpenAI over ChatGPT mental harms","firstPublishedAt":"2026-04-28T13:00:13.190311+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T03:13:04.910868+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","gpt-4o","openai","microsoft","sam-altman","psychosis","sycophancy","dependency","us","pennsylvania","platkin"]},{"id":"2026-doe-v-openai-stalking","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-10 against the two cited bodies (TechCrunch, read live in English; Bloomberg Law, whose live page exposes only the opening paragraphs before a login wall) and two newly inspected English bodies, The San Francisco Standard of 13 Apr 2026 and the Times of India relay of 11 Apr 2026. TechCrunch states the suit was 'filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco County' and the SF Standard reports 'a Monday hearing in San Francisco Superior Court' before Judge Harold Kahn, which place the court in the United States. The SF Standard describes the plaintiff as 'A San Francisco woman', which is her reported location and supports affected_person_countries US; TechCrunch's '53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur' describes the ChatGPT user. No body states where the stalking, the distribution of the generated reports to her family, friends and employer, or the January 2026 arrest took place: the SF Standard says the man was released 'from custody in another jurisdiction' without naming it, and her November notice being copied to the San Francisco Police Department is a police force's location, not an event location. Residence and police location do not locate an event, so event_countries remains a reviewed unknown. The provider's headquarters, the court's seat and the outlets' locations were not used.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"California","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"filed in California Superior Court by Edelson PC","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"according to a new lawsuit filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco County","location":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/stalking-victim-sues-openai-claims-chatgpt-fueled-her-abusers-delusions-and-ignored-her-warnings/","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"A San Francisco woman is asking a judge to order OpenAI","location":"https://sfstandard.com/2026/04/13/woman-fears-life-s-asking-judge-cut-ex-s-chatgpt/","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"In a Monday hearing in San Francisco Superior Court, Judge Harold Kahn ordered OpenAI","location":"https://sfstandard.com/2026/04/13/woman-fears-life-s-asking-judge-cut-ex-s-chatgpt/","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The event setting is unknown after review. No inspected body states where the stalking, the distribution of the ChatGPT-generated reports or the January 2026 arrest occurred; 'San Francisco woman' and 'Silicon Valley entrepreneur' describe the people, the man was released 'from custody in another jurisdiction' that no body names, and copying SFPD on the November notice is a police force's location, not an event location.","The complaint (San Francisco County Superior Court No. CGC26635725) was not obtained: edelson.com returned HTTP 403 live with no Internet Archive capture, and state-court filings are not on CourtListener. The geography rests on the outlets' statements about the filing and hearing.","Bloomberg Law was read only to its login wall (first three paragraphs, the third truncated).","Lead for a later full review: the SF Standard reports a 13 Apr 2026 hearing continuing the account suspension to a May hearing and OpenAI's written declaration that the account had not been accessed in over three months; the retained row's outcome_details stop at the filing."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-10","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/stalking-victim-sues-openai-claims-chatgpt-fueled-her-abusers-delusions-and-ignored-her-warnings/","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US, English, about 10,000 characters). States the suit was 'filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco County', describes the user as 'a 53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur', the plaintiff as 'Jane Doe', the temporary-restraining-order application, the November Notice of Abuse, the January arrest and the incompetency finding. Names no place for the stalking, the report distribution or the arrest.","access":"read","language":"en-US"},{"url":"https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/openai-accused-of-encouraging-stalkers-delusion-through-chatgpt","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English). Only the headline, dateline (April 10, 2026) and first three paragraphs (the third cut mid-sentence) are exposed before a 'Log in to keep reading' wall (about 1,400 characters). The visible text states the complaint was 'filed Thursday in California Superior Court' and describes the GPT-4o-generated clinical-style reports; it names no event location. The remainder of the article was not read.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://sfstandard.com/2026/04/13/woman-fears-life-s-asking-judge-cut-ex-s-chatgpt/","notes":"Newly inspected on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English, about 12,800 characters). The Standard reviewed the court filings and spoke to the plaintiff's lawyers. Describes the plaintiff as 'A San Francisco woman', the Monday (13 Apr 2026) hearing before Judge Harold Kahn in San Francisco Superior Court continuing the account suspension until a May hearing, OpenAI's declaration that the account had not been accessed in over three months, the November notice copied to SFPD and the FBI, and the ex-partner's release 'from custody in another jurisdiction' (not named). Not a cited source of the row; a lead for a later full review (post-filing hearing and OpenAI's response).","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/silicon-valley-entrepreneur-accused-of-using-chatgpt-to-harass-and-stalk-ex-girlfriend-openai-sued/articleshow/130186639.cms","notes":"Newly inspected on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English). A relay of the complaint reporting ('according to a lawsuit filed in California'; '53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur') with no reporting of its own and no event location; not independent of the TechCrunch account.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Jane Doe lawsuit alleges ChatGPT reinforced her abuser’s delusions and stalking","summary":"A woman’s lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced an abuser’s delusions, helped him create psychological claims about her and failed to address warnings about his conduct. The complaint describes stalking, threats and resulting harm. Those assertions remain the plaintiff’s allegations.","incidentDate":"2025-07-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-04-09","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation","delusion_reinforcement","psychological_manipulation","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","reputational_harm","exploitation_or_abuse","harm_to_others","legal_harm","loss_of_liberty","psychiatric_deterioration"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A participant distributed AI-generated diagnostic claims about his former partner, was later arrested for alleged bomb threats and assault, and was found incompetent to stand trial. The former partner sued over the resulting stalking and abuse.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1c","P1d","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5b","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint and criminal record document one AI participant's psychiatric and legal harms and one former partner's stalking, reputational, and psychological harms.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/stalking-victim-sues-openai-claims-chatgpt-fueled-her-abusers-delusions-and-ignored-her-warnings/","primarySourceLabel":"TechCrunch — Stalking victim sues OpenAI","firstPublishedAt":"2026-04-28T13:00:08.422853+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-10T03:26:40.997203+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","openai","stalking","harassment","bomb-threats","third-party-harm","delusion","us","california","edelson"]},{"id":"2026-lantieri-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-12 against the complaint itself (Lantieri v. OpenAI, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, file-stamped 02/27/2026, case number CGC-26-634445; PDF from the plaintiff firm, read in full in English) and the firm's PR Newswire release of 6 March 2026 (English). The complaint places the conversations between 14 April and 15 May 2025 and describes the harmful events of 15 May 2025: entry into two neighbours' apartments, the jump from a moving vehicle on the way to the hospital, the grand mal seizure in the emergency room and the intensive care stay. It names no city, county, state or hospital for any of these events. Its venue paragraph says wrongful conduct occurred in San Francisco County, which refers to the defendants' conduct, not to where the plaintiff was harmed. Paragraph 19 states that the plaintiff is a resident of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which supports affected_person_countries US; residence was not used as the event location, so event_countries stays a reviewed unknown. The caption and the release support court_countries US. The 2026-09-15 evidence passage \"Bay Area, California\" from victim_description is not carried forward because the complaint contradicts it.","evidence":[{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Plaintiff Michele Lantieri is a natural person and resident of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.","location":"https://stranchlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/2026-02-27-Lantieri-v-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO","location":"https://stranchlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/2026-02-27-Lantieri-v-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"has filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of San Francisco against OpenAI and Microsoft","location":"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stranch-jennings--garvey-files-lawsuit-against-openai-302707198.html","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["Event setting: the complaint names no city, state or hospital for the 15 May 2025 events; event_countries remains a reviewed unknown.","Narrative corrections made from the complaint by a separate update on 2026-10-12, outside this metadata review: the residence (paragraph 19, Pennsylvania; previously recorded as Bay Area, California), the event window (conversations 14 April to 15 May 2025 and hospitalisation on 15 May 2025; previously 2026-01-15), the file stamp of 27 February 2026 (the firm's release is dated 6 March 2026) and Samuel Altman as a named defendant."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-12","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://stranchlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/2026-02-27-Lantieri-v-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","notes":"Complaint PDF fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, 529,059 bytes; a byte-identical Internet Archive capture of 11 May 2026 exists), text extracted with pdftotext and read in full. Linked from the firm's release under an older filename that now returns HTTP 404; the live file is named 2026-02-27-Lantieri-v-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf. Defendants include OpenAI entities, Microsoft and Samuel Altman. Gives the residence (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), the conversation window 14 April to 15 May 2025, the 15 May 2025 events and hospital messages of 16 and 17 May 2025; names no place for the events or the hospital.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stranch-jennings--garvey-files-lawsuit-against-openai-302707198.html","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, html lang en). Plaintiff firm's release datelined OAKLAND, Calif., March 6, 2026; the dateline is the firm's office, not an event location. Describes the jump from a moving vehicle into traffic and the seizure without a place. Advocacy release by plaintiff counsel.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.ttownmedia.com/online_features/press_releases/stranch-jennings-garvey-files-lawsuit-against-openai/article_f871c0ab-870c-5eda-9411-358bf024d972.html","notes":"Press-release mirror. Fetch on 2026-10-12 returned HTTP 429 (67 bytes); not read, so no language is recorded. It mirrors the PR Newswire text and adds no independent account.","access":"unavailable","language":null},{"url":"https://socialmediavictims.org/chatgpt-lawsuits/","notes":"Social Media Victims Law Center ChatGPT lawsuit tracker, fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US). The current page does not mention Lantieri, so it supplies no location or case detail for this record.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Lantieri lawsuit alleges psychiatric crisis and serious injury during ChatGPT use","summary":"The Lantieri lawsuit alleges that intensive GPT-4o use reinforced delusional beliefs before a psychiatric crisis and serious injuries requiring hospital care. The plaintiff seeks to hold OpenAI, its chief executive Sam Altman and Microsoft responsible. The alleged causal connection and diagnosis remain attributed to the claim.","incidentDate":"2025-04-14","incidentEndDate":"2025-05-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-03-06","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["delusion_reinforcement","dependency_creation","psychological_manipulation","crisis_response","identity_destabilization"],"harmOutcomes":["physical_injury","hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","functional_impairment"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the complaint, Michele Lantieri jumped from a moving vehicle during a psychotic break, suffered a seizure and brain injury, and required hospitalization after five weeks of intensive GPT-4o use.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1c","P1d","P2c","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's injury, seizure, brain injury, and hospitalization.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stranch-jennings--garvey-files-lawsuit-against-openai-302707198.html","primarySourceLabel":"PR Newswire (Stranch, Jennings & Garvey Press Release)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-03-23T06:59:27.928554+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-12T03:07:18.629706+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","openai","microsoft","psychosis","brain_damage","gpt-4o"]},{"id":"2026-decruise-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-10 against the three cited bodies (Ars Technica, Mashable, Breitbart, all read live in English) and the complaint PDF linked by Ars and Mashable (DocumentCloud document 27170664, read from the Internet Archive capture of 2026-03-15 because the live host returned HTTP 403). The complaint is captioned 'FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO' (Superior Court of California), which places the court in the United States, and states 'Plaintiff Darian Decruise resides in Georgia', which is his reported residence and supports affected_person_countries US. Ars Technica calls him 'A Georgia college student' and reports the filing 'in San Diego Superior Court'. Neither the complaint nor any outlet states where the ChatGPT use, the referral to the school therapist or the one-week involuntary hospitalisation took place: the complaint never names the college or a city, and the outlets' 'Morehouse College student ... in Georgia' describes the person. Residence does not locate an event, so event_countries remains a reviewed unknown. The provider's headquarters, the court's seat and the outlets' locations were not used.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Morehouse College student, Georgia","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"San Diego Superior Court, California","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Plaintiff Darian Decruise resides in Georgia","location":"https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/27170664/decruise-v-opeenai.pdf","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO","location":"https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/27170664/decruise-v-opeenai.pdf","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"A Georgia college student named Darian DeCruise has sued OpenAI","location":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/before-psychosis-chatgpt-told-man-he-was-an-oracle-new-lawsuit-alleges/","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"which was filed late last month in San Diego Superior Court","location":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/before-psychosis-chatgpt-told-man-he-was-an-oracle-new-lawsuit-alleges/","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The event setting is unknown after review. The complaint and the three cited bodies state the plaintiff's residence (Georgia) and his college (Morehouse College, in the outlets only) but none states where the ChatGPT conversations, the school-therapist referral or the hospitalisation occurred; residence does not locate an event.","The Law.com Recorder report of 26 Jan 2026 that Ars credits as first reporting the filing returned a paywall shell (HTTP 200, no article text, live and in the 2026-09-25 Internet Archive capture) and could not be read.","The complaint was read from an archived copy, not the live host; the DocumentCloud page and API returned HTTP 403. The retained row's statement that the case was consolidated into a California JCCP in late February 2026 was not re-checked in this metadata pass."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-10","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/before-psychosis-chatgpt-told-man-he-was-an-oracle-new-lawsuit-alleges/","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English, about 4,900 characters of article text). States the filing 'late last month in San Diego Superior Court', describes the plaintiff as 'A Georgia college student' and a 'Morehouse College student', credits ALM with first reporting the case, and links the complaint on DocumentCloud. Names no city or state for the use, the therapist referral or the hospitalisation.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://mashable.com/article/ai-injury-attorneys-ai-psychosis-case-chatgpt-openai-lawsuit","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English). Describes 'Morehouse College student Darian DeCruise in Georgia', the Schenk Law Firm's 'AI injury attorneys' marketing, the hospitalisation and bipolar diagnosis, and the missed semester; links the same DocumentCloud complaint. Carries a Ziff Davis disclosure. Locates no event.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2026/02/21/college-student-sues-openai-claiming-chatgpt-caused-a-psychological-break/","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English). Its second paragraph reads 'Ars Technica reports that Darian DeCruise, a student at Morehouse College, has initiated legal action against OpenAI in San Diego Superior Court' and adds no reporting of its own; derivative of the Ars Technica source and not independent. 'A college student from Georgia' describes the person.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/27170664/decruise-v-opeenai.pdf","notes":"The complaint linked by Ars Technica and Mashable (DocumentCloud document 27170664). Live DocumentCloud URLs returned HTTP 403 to this fetcher on 2026-10-10; the PDF was read from the Internet Archive capture web/20260315214754id_ (2,399,468 bytes, PDF 1.7, text extracted with pdftotext, English, about 96,700 characters). Captioned for the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego; paragraph 1 states 'Plaintiff Darian Decruise resides in Georgia'; the factual allegations describe college use from 2023, the shift in ChatGPT's responses, the school therapist referral and the one-week involuntary hospitalisation without naming the college, a city or a state. Venue rests on the defendants transacting business in the county. Exhibits, if any, were not separately inspected.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"DeCruise lawsuit alleges ChatGPT reinforced delusions preceding hospitalisation","summary":"The DeCruise lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced beliefs that the plaintiff had a special destiny and encouraged isolation before involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation. Reporting describes the complaint. The alleged causal role remains unestablished.","incidentDate":"2025-04-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-02-19","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI, Inc.","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["delusion_reinforcement","isolation_encouragement","dependency_creation","treatment_discouragement"],"harmOutcomes":["hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","social_isolation"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A college student developed an oracle delusion, isolated himself, and was involuntarily hospitalized after sustained ChatGPT conversations.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1c","P2c","P2d","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's psychiatric deterioration, isolation, and hospitalization.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/before-psychosis-chatgpt-told-man-he-was-an-oracle-new-lawsuit-alleges/","primarySourceLabel":"Ars Technica","firstPublishedAt":"2026-02-22T09:59:21.046033+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-10T03:26:40.763043+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","openai","psychosis","hospitalization","delusion","isolation","adult","us"]},{"id":"2025-israel-tira-chatgpt-knife-attack","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Carried forward from the 2026-09-15 metadata review and now supported by inspected bodies. JFeed (21 May 2025) and The Jerusalem Post (22 May 2025) both place the attempted stabbing at the police station in Tira, Israel, describe the accused as a 16-year-old from Tira and the intended target as a Border Police officer at that station, and report the indictment in the Lod District Juvenile Court, so event, affected-person and court countries are IL. This is a metadata review and does not verify the account of AI involvement.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"from Tira, Israel","location":"summary","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["IL"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'Approximately two months ago, he armed himself with a 10-centimeter knife and walked to the Tira police station.'","location":"https://www.jfeed.com/news-israel/chatgpt-teen-terror-plot","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["IL"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'filed an indictment in the Lod District Juvenile Court against a 16-year-old from Tira'","location":"https://www.jfeed.com/news-israel/chatgpt-teen-terror-plot","supports":["court_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["IL"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'The teenager, from Tira, allegedly entered the police station with a 10cm blade on the night of March 5, 2025'","location":"https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/crime-in-israel/article-854966","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["IL"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'An indictment was filed at the Juvenile District Court in Lod, against a 16-year-old who broke into a police station'","location":"https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/crime-in-israel/article-854966","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["IL"]}],"court_countries":["IL"],"event_countries":["IL"],"affected_person_countries":["IL"]},"unresolved":["Event date: the retained row records 2025-03-21 (day precision), but The Jerusalem Post gives the night of 5 March 2025 and JFeed says 'approximately two months' before 21 May 2025. The retained date is not supported by either inspected body; a date correction is a separate review task.","Charge wording: JFeed says the minor is charged with attempting serious bodily harm under aggravated circumstances classified as an act of terrorism; The Jerusalem Post's body says he 'has not been charged' with that offence as an act of terrorism, which reads as an editing error but is not reconciled here.","Both inspected reports rely on the State Prosecution's indictment (JFeed via Ynet); the indictment itself was not inspected.","The affected-person country records the accused's home town and the officer's duty station; no separate residence information for the officer is given.","The retained additional_sources date for The Jerusalem Post (2025-05-21) differs from the page's publication time (22 May 2025, 00:38 UTC); a date correction is a separate review task."],"reviewed_on":"2026-09-25","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://www.jfeed.com/news-israel/chatgpt-teen-terror-plot","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-25 (JFeed, 21 May 2025; html lang=en). Reports the indictment in the Lod District Juvenile Court 'as reported by Ynet', the accused's use of ChatGPT to research methods, the walk to the Tira police station about two months earlier and the attempted stabbing of a Border Police officer. Ynet itself was not inspected.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/crime-in-israel/article-854966","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-25 (The Jerusalem Post, 22 May 2025; html lang=en). Places the entry into the police station on the night of 5 March 2025, names the Juvenile District Court in Lod, and says the teenager discussed options and methods with ChatGPT before the attack.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Israeli Border Police ChatGPT-Assisted Knife Attack Attempt","summary":"A 16-year-old from Tira, Israel, used ChatGPT to explore ways to execute a terrorist attack and seek operational planning advice. Motivated as revenge for Operation Iron Swords, he armed himself with a knife, stormed the Tira police station, shouted 'Allahu Akbar,' and attempted to stab a Border Police officer. The attack was thwarted and he was apprehended.","incidentDate":"2025-03-21","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-05-21","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation","delusion_reinforcement","minor_exploitation"],"harmOutcomes":["harm_to_others","legal_harm","loss_of_liberty"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A 16-year-old participant attempted to stab a police officer after using ChatGPT to explore attack methods and operational planning. He was apprehended and prosecuted.","frameworkFacets":["P1d","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"outward","causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The criminal case documents one arrested minor AI participant. The attack was thwarted without a documented injury to the intended target.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"IL","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.jfeed.com/news-israel/chatgpt-teen-terror-plot","primarySourceLabel":"JFeed: ChatGPT Teen Terror Plot","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-22T07:15:22.852777+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:06.833272+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["chatgpt","terrorism","knife-attack","minor","israel","lone-wolf","radicalization","violence","operation-iron-swords"]},{"id":"2025-finland-pirkkala-chatgpt-stabbing","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Carried forward from the 2026-09-15 metadata review and now supported by inspected source bodies: both GNET Insights and the University of Portsmouth record state that the stabbing occurred at a school in Pirkkala, Finland; the 14 July Insight names it as the Vähäjärvi school, injuring three female pupils. No court proceeding is described in the inspected sources, so no court country is recorded; police and prosecution locations are not courts. This is a metadata review and does not verify the underlying account.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"at Vähäjärvi school in Pirkkala, Finland","location":"summary","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["FI"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'On 20 May 2025, a stabbing incident occurred at a school in the town of Pirkkala, southern Finland, in which three female pupils, all under the age of 15, were injured.'","location":"https://gnet-research.org/2025/06/12/prompted-to-harm-analysing-the-pirkkala-school-stabbing-and-its-digital-manifesto/","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["FI"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'On 20 May 2025, a 16-year-old boy stabbed three of his female classmates at the Vähäjärvi school in Pirkkala, Finland.'","location":"https://gnet-research.org/2025/07/14/ai-at-the-centre-violent-extremist-exploitation-in-pirkkala/","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["FI"]}],"court_countries":[],"event_countries":["FI"],"affected_person_countries":["FI"]},"unresolved":["No court country: none of the inspected sources describes a prosecution, trial or court decision; the perpetrator's age (16) and Finnish juvenile procedure are not addressed in this pass.","All three cited sources are English-language secondary analyses citing Finnish reporting that this pass did not inspect (the 12 June piece links Yle and Helsingin Sanomat items; the 14 July piece names Iltalehti as the manifesto's recipient and links the English-language Helsinki Times); no Finnish-language original was added.","Full case_facts review deferred; this pass records source languages and geography only."],"reviewed_on":"2026-09-21","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://gnet-research.org/2025/07/14/ai-at-the-centre-violent-extremist-exploitation-in-pirkkala/","notes":"Read live in English on 2026-09-21 (GNET Insight, 14 July 2025; html lang=en-GB). Analytical piece: attack at the Vähäjärvi school in Pirkkala; manifesto emailed to Iltalehti; 'reported use' of ChatGPT in planning. Secondary analysis, not primary reporting.","access":"read","language":"en-GB"},{"url":"https://gnet-research.org/2025/06/12/prompted-to-harm-analysing-the-pirkkala-school-stabbing-and-its-digital-manifesto/","notes":"Read live in English on 2026-09-21 (GNET Insight, 12 June 2025; html lang=en-GB). Analytical piece: stabbing in Pirkkala, southern Finland, three female pupils under 15 injured; manifesto 'allegedly written with the aid of ChatGPT' sent to a Finnish newspaper.","access":"read","language":"en-GB"},{"url":"https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/en/publications/prompted-to-harm-analysing-the-pirkkala-school-stabbing-and-its-d/","notes":"Read live in English on 2026-09-21 (University of Portsmouth research portal; html lang=en, og:locale en_GB). Repository record of the 12 June 2025 GNET Insight with the same abstract; not an independent source.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Finland Pirkkala School Stabbing (ChatGPT Manifesto)","summary":"A 16-year-old boy used ChatGPT to help write an attack manifesto with a 10-point attack sequence before stabbing three female students under age 15 at Vähäjärvi school in Pirkkala, Finland. The incident marked a critical inflection point in AI-facilitated violence, demonstrating how accessible AI tools can empower lone actors with violent misogynist ideologies.","incidentDate":"2025-05-20","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-06-12","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation","delusion_reinforcement","minor_exploitation","psychological_manipulation"],"harmOutcomes":["physical_injury","harm_to_others","legal_harm","loss_of_liberty"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A 16-year-old participant stabbed three girls at a Finnish school after using ChatGPT to help create a manifesto and ten-step attack sequence. He was arrested and prosecuted.","frameworkFacets":["P1d","P3c","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"outward","causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":3,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The criminal case documents one AI participant who was arrested and three students who were stabbed.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"FI","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://gnet-research.org/2025/07/14/ai-at-the-centre-violent-extremist-exploitation-in-pirkkala/","primarySourceLabel":"GNET Research: AI at the Centre - Violent Extremist Exploitation in Pirkkala","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-22T07:14:58.121301+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:01.766625+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["chatgpt","violence","school-attack","manifesto","incel","misogyny","minor","finland","stabbing","radicalization"]},{"id":"2025-holmen-norway-gdpr","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Carried forward from the 2026-09-15 metadata review and now checked against the inspected noyb press page. noyb describes him as the Norwegian user and refers to his home town without naming it; residence in Trondheim rests on the retained row, so affected-person country is NO by reported residence. The noyb page does not state where he queried ChatGPT or where the output was viewed, so the event location remains unknown after review. The complaint was filed with the Norwegian data protection authority (Datatilsynet), a regulator rather than a court, so court_countries is empty as a reviewed result. This is a metadata review and does not verify the underlying account.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Trondheim, Norway","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["NO"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'When the Norwegian user Arve Hjalmar Holmen wanted to find out if ChatGPT had any information about him, he was confronted with a made up horror story'","location":"https://noyb.eu/en/ai-hallucinations-chatgpt-created-fake-child-murderer","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["NO"]}],"court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["NO"]},"unresolved":["The location where the ChatGPT output was generated or viewed is not stated in the inspected noyb page or the retained row; event_countries remains empty as a reviewed unknown.","No court proceeding: the Datatilsynet complaint is a regulatory complaint, so court_countries is empty as a reviewed result.","The complaint PDF linked from the noyb page and any Norwegian-language coverage were not inspected; only the English press page was reviewed."],"reviewed_on":"2026-09-23","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://noyb.eu/en/ai-hallucinations-chatgpt-created-fake-child-murderer","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-23 (noyb, 20 March 2025; html lang=en; the page offers translations in other languages). Describes the complainant as a Norwegian user, the fabricated output (murder of two of his children, attempted murder of his third son, 21-year sentence), the mix of real details including his home town, and the complaint filed with the Norwegian Datatilsynet. Does not locate the query or the viewing of the output.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Holmen v. OpenAI - Norway GDPR Complaint","summary":"ChatGPT falsely accused Norwegian citizen Arve Hjalmar Holmen of murdering two of his sons, attempting to murder his third son, and being sentenced to 21 years prison. Mixed real personal details with horrific fabrications. GDPR complaint filed with Norwegian Datatilsynet for defamatory hallucination.","incidentDate":"2025-03-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2025-03-15","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["psychological_manipulation","identity_destabilization","third_party_harm_facilitation"],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Arve Hjalmar Holmen discovered ChatGPT combining real personal details with false claims that he murdered two sons and attempted to murder a third. He filed a GDPR complaint over the defamatory output.","frameworkFacets":["P3a","P5b","P5c"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The regulator complaint documents one named participant's distress and reputational harm.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"NO","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://noyb.eu/en/ai-hallucinations-chatgpt-created-fake-child-murderer","primarySourceLabel":"noyb — 'AI hallucinations: ChatGPT created a fake child murderer', the complaint filed with Datatilsynet","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-13T10:13:04.624733+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:05.427919+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["norway","gdpr","chatgpt","defamation","hallucination","noyb","false_accusations"]}]}