{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-17T07:11:59.976Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"thesis","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":11,"coverage":{"cases":11,"countries":6,"languages":8,"unknownLocation":4,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":2,"lawsuits":2,"regulatory":2,"minors":0,"coreRelations":11,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2024-italy-tv-satire-show-ai-deepfakes-of-journalist-mentana-privacy-regulator-warns-broadcaster","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'per alcuni servizi di Striscia la Notizia, nei quali l’immagine e la voce di Enrico Mentana erano state manipolate mediante l’impiego di sistemi di intelligenza artificiale.'; 'Nei filmati venivano attribuite al noto giornalista dichiarazioni mai pronunciate, mentre la sua immagine era collocata virtualmente nello studio televisivo dell’emittente per la quale lavora.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'servizi costruiti prendendo come spunto fatti che hanno coinvolto diversi personaggi pubblici e accompagnandoli con commenti di vario genere pronunciati dal deepfake del reclamante doppiato con sistemi di intelligenza artificiale'; 'è stata utilizzata l’immagine reale del reclamante, ripresa peraltro all’interno dello studio televisivo da cui il medesimo dirige un telegiornale di fascia serale, alterandone la genuinità attraverso un doppiaggio effettuato con strumenti tali da non rendere chiaramente percepibile l’esistenza della predetta alterazione'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Striscia la Notizia aired segments in which the image and voice of journalist Enrico Mentana were manipulated with AI systems, attributing to him statements he never made while placing his image in the studio of the channel he works for.","causal_attribution":"The regulator's findings in its decision and press release; R.T.I. itself describes computer-generated dubbing."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'nella puntata di venerdì 8 novembre manderà in onda un servizio che vedrà protagonista Enrico Mentana, ma in versione deepfake, ovvero con voce e immagini generati dall’intelligenza artificiale.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"A preview published on 8 November 2024 describes a Striscia la Notizia segment airing that evening in which a deepfake Mentana, with voice and images generated by AI, commented on a game show.","causal_attribution":"A press preview of the programme; it establishes that such segments aired from at least November 2024, not which segments the complaint listed (the decision redacts their dates)."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'moltissime persone hanno creduto che i video, prodotti da Striscia la Notizia e divulgati sul mezzo televisivo e sui social, fossero reali'; 'rivelano come molte persone siano convinte che le dichiarazioni siano autentiche, determinando con ciò una gravissima lesione dell’onore, della reputazione e della propria professionalità'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Mentana complained to the Garante that many people believed the videos were real and that users' insulting comments showed serious harm to his honour, reputation and professionalism.","causal_attribution":"The complainant's submissions as recorded in the decision."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'il realismo delle immagini, la scarsa percepibilità dell’alterazione e la plausibilità delle dichiarazioni avrebbero potuto indurre il pubblico a ritenere autentici i contenuti. Anche le avvertenze sulla natura artificiale dei video non sono state ritenute sufficientemente chiare'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'amplificando altresì il rischio di farne veicolo di disinformazione per il pubblico, come confermato dai numerosi messaggi di scherno e/o di offesa ricevuti via social dal reclamante'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Garante found that the content could lead the public to consider it authentic, that the warnings were not sufficiently clear, and that the real studio setting amplified the risk of disinformation, as confirmed by the numerous mocking or offensive messages Mentana received on social media.","causal_attribution":"The regulator's findings; the regulator's reference to the messages rests on material in the complaint."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Il Garante ha quindi accertato la violazione dell’articolo 5 del GDPR'; 'ha adottato nei confronti di R.T.I. Spa un provvedimento di ammonimento e ha vietato l’ulteriore utilizzo dei dati di Enrico Mentana con le modalità contestate'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'dispone il divieto di ulteriore trattamento dei dati del reclamante con le modalità sopra descritte, eccettuata la mera conservazione degli stessi ai fini di un loro eventuale utilizzo in sede giudiziaria'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Garante found breaches of GDPR Articles 5 and 25, warned R.T.I. and prohibited further processing of Mentana's data in the contested way, except retention for judicial use.","causal_attribution":"The dispositive part of the decision."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'l’unica attività realizzata da R.T.I. è stata quella di disporre, con riguardo ai predetti filmati, il doppiaggio del dott. Mentana, con voce diversa dalla sua, attraverso appositi sistemi informativi'; 'la finalità dei servizi oggetto di reclamo è quella di esercitare il diritto di satira ricorrendo all’imitazione del reclamante'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"R.T.I. argued that its only intervention was dubbing licensed footage with a different, computer-generated voice, that the segments were satire, and that disclaimers made clear it was not the real Mentana speaking.","causal_attribution":"The broadcaster's submissions as recorded in the decision; the Garante did not accept them."}],"effects":[{"label":"AI deepfake segments attributing invented statements to a journalist","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"mocking or offensive messages and risk to reputation found by the regulator","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/10281135","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Garante press release of 7 August 2026; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"garante-privacy"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/10281021","kind":"official_record","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Garante decision of 23 July 2026 (doc. web 10281021), read in full; dates and names of counsel are redacted as XX; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"garante-privacy"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://dilei.it/spettacolo/striscia-la-notizia-enrico-mentana-svela-il-vero-volto-stefano-de-martino/1587080/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. DiLei entertainment preview, 8 November 2024; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"dilei-8-nov-2024"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["Which segments the complaint covered and when they aired; the decision redacts the dates.","Which AI tools were used.","Whether R.T.I. challenged the decision in court and what measures it reported to the Garante."],"geography":{"basis":"The segments were aired by R.T.I. (Reti Televisive Italiane) on Striscia la Notizia and investigated by Italy's data protection authority; the depicted person is the director of La7's news bulletin. His country of residence is not stated. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["IT"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): Italy's data protection authority found that a broadcaster's AI deepfakes of a journalist could be taken as authentic, noted the offensive messages he received, warned the broadcaster and barred further use. The journalist is a public figure who brought the complaint and is named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-17"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Italy's data protection authority, after an investigation of the complaint, states that the journalist's image and voice were manipulated with AI systems in the segments and that statements he never made were attributed to him; the broadcaster told the authority it dubbed the footage with a computer-generated voice. The authority found the content could be taken as authentic and cited the mocking or offensive messages he received, which is the reported harm.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Italy's privacy regulator warns broadcaster R.T.I. and bars further use of AI deepfakes of journalist Enrico Mentana in Striscia la Notizia segments","summary":"The satirical television programme Striscia la Notizia, published by R.T.I., aired segments in which the image and voice of the journalist Enrico Mentana, director of La7's news bulletin, were, according to the Garante, manipulated with AI systems so that he appeared in his own studio making statements he never made (its decision describes real footage from his studio altered by AI dubbing); a November 2024 preview describes one such segment. After Mentana complained, Italy's data protection authority (Garante) found on 23 July 2026 that the realism of the images, the low perceptibility of the alteration and the plausibility of the statements could lead the public to think the content authentic, and that the disclaimers were not clear enough. It found breaches of GDPR Articles 5 and 25, issued a warning to R.T.I. and prohibited further processing of his data in that way. The Garante noted the numerous mocking or offensive messages he received on social media. R.T.I. argued that the segments were satire, that it only dubbed licensed footage with a computer-generated voice, and that its disclaimers made the deepfake evident. No fine was imposed.","incidentDate":"2024-11-08","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-08-07","aiSystem":"AI systems used by the programme to manipulate the journalist's image and voice (the Garante); R.T.I. describes computer-generated dubbing of licensed footage. No product is named.","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Italy's data protection authority found that AI deepfakes of a journalist on a satirical TV programme could be taken as authentic and noted the numerous mocking or offensive messages he received; it warned the broadcaster and barred further use.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the journalist depicted in the deepfakes, whose complaint the Garante upheld (decision 10281021). Viewers are an audience and are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"IT","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/10281135","primarySourceLabel":"Garante per la protezione dei dati personali, press release, 7 August 2026: stop to satirical deepfakes of Enrico Mentana","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-17T03:08:22.075012+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-17T03:08:22.075012+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","voice_synthesis","television","satire","data_protection_authority","gdpr"]},{"id":"2026-leiden-law-student-thesis-sanction-over-ai-invented-references-annulled-by-council-of-state","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Bij beslissing van 29 januari 2026 heeft de examencommissie de scriptie van'; 'tot en met 28 januari 2027 uitgesloten van deelname aan het bachelorscriptietraject en enig ander tentamen van een door de faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid verzorgde opleiding'; 'De examencommissie heeft deze sanctie opgelegd omdat in het verwijzingsapparaat van zijn bachelorscriptie een aantal niet bestaande bronnen is opgenomen. Volgens de examencommissie duiden deze fictieve bronvermeldingen op ongeoorloofd gebruik van generatieve AI en dus fraude.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'De examencommissie beschouwde dit als fraude.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 29 January 2026 the Leiden law faculty's exam board declared the student's bachelor thesis invalid and excluded him until 28 January 2027 from the thesis track and any exam in the faculty's programmes, because, in its view, non-existent sources in the references indicated unauthorised use of generative AI and therefore fraud.","causal_attribution":"The decisions are recorded in the ruling; the PONT summary restates them."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Hij heeft niet zelf bronnen verzonnen, maar de AI-tool die hij heeft gebruikt bij het opstellen van het verwijzingsapparaat heeft niet alle bronnen uit het concept van zijn scriptie correct overgenomen.'; 'Het gaat om zeven foutieve verwijzingen - waarvan één tweemaal - op een totaal van zesendertig voetnoten met bronverwijzingen.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The student stated that he had not invented sources himself and that the AI tool he used to prepare the references had not carried over all sources from his draft correctly, affecting seven references in footnotes of the final version, one of them twice, out of 36 footnotes with references.","causal_attribution":"The ruling documents that he made this argument; the count of errors is stated by the court."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'heeft toegelicht dat hij voor zijn scriptie AI heeft gebruikt voor een spellingcontrole en om zijn bronnenlijst te controleren en te ordenen'; 'toegelicht welke bronnen door AI zijn verdraaid, zoals verkeerde jaartallen of voorletters van auteurs, of door AI zijn bedacht'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Sommige bronnen bevatten verkeerde jaartallen of auteursnamen, andere waren door AI verzonnen.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"He had used AI to spell-check the thesis and to check and order its reference list, and the AI distorted some references (for example wrong years or author initials) and invented others.","causal_attribution":"The student's own account; the appeals board and the Council of State found it plausible, but no examination of the tool's output is described."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Bij beslissing van 4 maart 2026 heeft het CBE het door'; 'heeft voldoende aannemelijk gemaakt dat hij met het oog op het opmaken van zijn bronnenlijst gebruik heeft gemaakt van generatieve AI. Dat is een geoorloofde vorm van AI-gebruik. Dat daarbij niet-bestaande bronnen in het verwijzingsapparaat zijn terechtgekomen, komt evenwel voor zijn rekening.'; 'voor de duur van een half jaar een passender maatregel'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 4 March 2026 the university's appeals board for examinations upheld his administrative appeal, finding that he had plausibly shown he used generative AI to compile his reference list, a permitted use, that the non-existent sources were his responsibility, and that a half-year exclusion was a more fitting measure.","causal_attribution":"Recorded in the ruling."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Bij beslissing van 6 mei 2026 heeft de examencommissie de scriptie van'; 'tot en met 29 juli 2026 uitgesloten van deelname aan het bachelorscriptietraject en enig ander tentamen'; 'Bij beslissing van 8 juli 2026 heeft het CBE het door'; 'ingestelde administratief beroep ongegrond verklaard'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 6 May 2026 the exam board again declared the thesis invalid and excluded him until 29 July 2026, and on 8 July 2026 the appeals board dismissed his appeal against that decision.","causal_attribution":"Recorded in the ruling."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Datum uitspraak: 14 oktober 2026'; 'al deze juiste bronnen in een eerdere versie van de scriptie, vóór het gebruik van AI, in verkorte vorm zijn terug te vinden'; 'heeft het CBE onvoldoende aannemelijk gemaakt dat sprake is van meer dan alleen een onzorgvuldigheid'; 'alsnog worden beoordeeld, met inachtneming van wat de Afdeling heeft overwogen'; 'Het is aan de examinator of, en, zo ja, welke gevolgen hij in dat kader aan de geconstateerde onzorgvuldigheid verbindt voor het cijfer.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'De Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State geeft hem gelijk.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 14 October 2026 the Council of State found that the appeals board had not made it plausible that there was more than carelessness, so fraud was not established beyond reasonable doubt; it noted that the correct sources were in an earlier version written before AI was used, annulled the decisions of 8 July and 6 May 2026, ordered that the thesis still be assessed, and left it to the examiner whether the carelessness affects the grade.","causal_attribution":"The ruling is the decision itself."},{"id":"c7","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'te wijten is dat hij na het gebruik van AI niet nogmaals zelfstandig alle bronvermeldingen in de voetnoten heeft gecontroleerd'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'De Raad van State stelt expliciet dat hij de bronvermeldingen na het gebruik van AI zelfstandig had moeten controleren.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Council of State held that the student was at fault for not independently checking all the references again after using AI.","causal_attribution":"The court's finding; it bears on the student's own share in the errors."}],"effects":[{"label":"bachelor thesis declared invalid and exclusion from the thesis track and faculty exams, later annulled","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://data.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraken/content?id=ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:6088","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"nl","translation_note":"Read in Dutch by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Full text of the Council of State ruling 202602163/1/A2 of 14 October 2026 (ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:6088) from the rechtspraak.nl open data service, HTTP 200; the student is anonymised in the ruling.","independence_group":"raad-van-state-ruling-202602163"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://privacy-web.nl/samenvatting/ai-verzint-bronnen-in-scriptie-raad-van-state-ziet-geen-fraude/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"nl","translation_note":"Read in Dutch by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. PONT Data & Privacy editorial summary of the same ruling, 15 October 2026, HTTP 200, full text read; it derives from the ruling and is not independent of it.","independence_group":"raad-van-state-ruling-202602163"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["education","justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool the student used; the ruling does not name it.","Whether the exclusion orders kept him from any particular exam or delayed his studies, and what grade the thesis eventually received.","The exact wording of the incorrect references and how the examiner discovered them."],"geography":{"basis":"The sanctioning exam board belongs to the Faculty of Law of Leiden University and the appeal was decided by the Council of State, both in the Netherlands. The ruling withholds the student's place of residence, so that field is left unknown.","court_countries":["NL"],"event_countries":["NL"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published on the Council of State's ruling of 14 October 2026: the student's explanation, found plausible by the university appeals board and the court, is that a generative AI tool he used to order his reference list distorted or invented seven references; the exam board treated those references as evidence of AI-enabled fraud, invalidated the thesis and excluded him from exams, and the court annulled the sanction because only carelessness had been shown.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-17"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The Council of State ruling records the student's explanation that the AI tool he used to prepare his footnote references did not carry over all sources from his draft correctly and that it distorted some references (wrong years or author initials) and invented others; the university's appeals board found he had plausibly shown he used generative AI for his reference list, and the Council of State found his explanation plausible, noting that the correct sources were in an earlier version written before he used AI. The exam board itself attributed the fictitious references to generative AI and sanctioned him for them. The AI tool's output, returned to the student and kept in his thesis, is what the sanction was based on.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Leiden law student's thesis invalidated and exams barred over references he says an AI tool distorted or invented; Council of State annuls fraud sanction","summary":"A law student at Leiden University used a generative AI tool to spell-check his bachelor thesis and to check and order its reference list. Seven of the thesis's footnote references (one of them appearing twice, out of 36 footnotes with references) were wrong in the final version; according to his explanation, the tool had distorted some of them, for example with wrong years or author initials, and invented others. On 29 January 2026 the faculty's exam board declared the thesis invalid and excluded him until 28 January 2027 from the thesis track and every exam in the faculty's programmes, reasoning that the fictitious references indicated unauthorised use of generative AI and therefore fraud. The university's appeals board for examinations found in March 2026 that he had plausibly shown he used generative AI to prepare his reference list, which it called a permitted use, but held him responsible for the non-existent sources; the exam board then re-imposed the invalidation with an exclusion until 29 July 2026, and the appeals board upheld that in July. On 14 October 2026 the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State (Raad van State) found his explanation plausible, held that no more than carelessness had been shown, and annulled the sanction; the thesis must now be graded, and the examiner may take the incorrect references into account in the grade.","incidentDate":"2026-01-29","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-14","aiSystem":"An unnamed generative AI tool that the student used to spell-check his bachelor thesis and to check and order its reference list, according to the Council of State ruling","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI writing tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["educational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The exam board declared the student's thesis invalid and excluded him from the thesis track and the faculty's exams, first until January 2027 and then until 29 July 2026, over references that according to his accepted explanation an AI tool had distorted or invented; the Council of State annulled the sanction on 14 October 2026.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the appellant student, who used the AI tool himself (ruling, paragraphs 1 to 6).","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"NL","platformType":"other","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://data.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraken/content?id=ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:6088","primarySourceLabel":"Raad van State, ruling 202602163/1/A2 (ECLI:NL:RVS:2026:6088), 14 October 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-17T03:05:14.201173+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-17T03:05:14.201173+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["academic-integrity","thesis","non-existent-references","fraud-sanction-annulled","netherlands","administrative-court","own-use"]},{"id":"2024-beijing-internet-court-ai-synthesised-voice-of-older-parenting-educator-in-book-sales-videos-company-liable","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'2024年，某文化公司为销售家庭育儿类图书，委托带货主播制作短视频开展商业推广。'; '主播发布的多条宣传视频中'; '公开演讲、授课的画面片段'; '同时配置AI合成音频'; '用户点击视频跳转链接，可直接进入该文化公司店铺购买图书。'; '在教育、育儿领域具有一定知名度'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'在“带货主播利用AI技术实施侵权案”中，商家未经许可合成老年人声音用于商业宣传，该声音结合音色、语调、发音节奏及社会知名度，能够识别特定老年人的'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In 2024 a culture company selling family parenting books commissioned a livestream sales host to make promotional short videos; several videos used clips of the plaintiff's public lectures with AI-synthesised audio closely resembling the plaintiff's voice, linked viewers to the company's shop, and were not authorised by the plaintiff.","causal_attribution":"The facts are the court's account in its 16 October 2026 release, relayed by The Paper (detail) and China News Service (the vice-president's summary). Both depend on the same release, so the claim is reported."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'法院审理认为，判断AI合成声音是否构成对自然人声音权益的侵害，核心在于能否识别特定自然人。'; '本案中文化公司未对素材授权情况进行审查，存在过失，与带货主播构成共同侵权，据此判决该文化公司赔礼道歉，并赔偿经济损失及维权合理支出。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'该声音结合音色、语调、发音节奏及社会知名度，能够识别特定老年人的，构成对其人格权益的侵害；委托方未尽审查注意义务的，承担连带责任。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Beijing Internet Court held that the AI-synthesised voice, used with the plaintiff's image and public profile, was identifiable as the plaintiff's and infringed the plaintiff's portrait and voice rights; it found the company, which had not checked the material's authorisation, jointly liable with the host and ordered it to apologise and compensate economic losses and reasonable costs.","causal_attribution":"The ruling is attributed to the court as relayed from its release; the judgment text was not read, so the claim is reported rather than documented. The court's finding establishes the infringement for the purposes of the case."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'在北京互联网法院10月16日发布的涉老年人网络侵权典型案例中'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'这是记者16日从北京互联网法院涉老年人网络侵权案件审理情况新闻发布会上获悉的。'; '已出现非法使用AI技术深度合成老年人肖像或声音用于不当目的的情形'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The court released the case on 16 October 2026 at a press conference on online infringement cases involving older people, and said that AI deep synthesis of older people's portraits or voices for improper purposes has appeared in such cases.","causal_attribution":"Both outlets report the same press conference."}],"effects":[{"label":"voice imitated by AI-synthesised audio and image used without consent in sales videos; court found portrait and voice rights infringed and ordered compensation (court account)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_34262393","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17; no human reviewer inspected the text. The Paper's report of a case from the Beijing Internet Court's 16 October 2026 release of typical cases on online infringement involving older people ('据通报').","independence_group":"beijing-internet-court-older-people-cases-release-2026-10-16"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.chinanews.com.cn/fz/2026/10-16/10715820.shtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17; no human reviewer inspected the text. China News Service report of the same Beijing Internet Court press conference, quoting the court's vice-president.","independence_group":"beijing-internet-court-older-people-cases-release-2026-10-16"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["The judgment date, the amounts awarded and whether the host was a party to the suit.","The tool used to synthesise the voice, the platform, and the number of videos and viewers.","The text of the judgment; both reports rest on the court's release.","How the court established that the audio was AI-synthesised; the reports do not give the technical basis."],"geography":{"basis":"The Beijing Internet Court decided the case. The reports anonymise the parties and do not say where the company or host was based, where the videos were published or where the plaintiff lives, so no event or affected-person country is recorded.","court_countries":["CN"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): according to the Beijing Internet Court's account, a sales host's promotional videos used AI-synthesised audio identifiable as an older educator's voice without consent, and the court found the commissioning company jointly liable and ordered an apology and compensation. One reporting chain (the court's release, read in two outlets); the parties are anonymised by the court.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-17"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The court's account, relayed by The Paper, says the host's videos set clips of the plaintiff's lectures to AI-synthesised audio whose timbre, intonation and rhythm closely resembled the plaintiff's voice, and the court decided the case as an AI-synthesised voice infringement; China News Service quotes the court's vice-president describing the merchant's unauthorised synthesis of the older person's voice. The AI output is the synthesised voice imitating the plaintiff (depicted_or_impersonated), which the court found identifiable and infringing. The tool is not named.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Beijing Internet Court says a sales host's videos for a book company used an older parenting educator's AI-synthesised voice without consent; company liable","summary":"According to the Beijing Internet Court's account, released on 16 October 2026 among typical cases on online infringement involving older people, a culture company selling family parenting books commissioned a livestream sales host in 2024 to make promotional short videos. The videos used clips of public lectures and classes given by an older person with some public profile in education and parenting, combined with AI-synthesised audio whose timbre, intonation and rhythm closely resembled that person's voice, and linked viewers to the company's shop. Neither the images nor the audio had been authorised. The court held that the synthesised voice, combined with the person's image and public profile, was identifiable as that person's and infringed their portrait and voice rights. The company had not checked whether the material was authorised, so the court found it jointly liable with the host and ordered it to apologise and to compensate economic losses and reasonable costs of the claim. The amounts, the judgment date and the tool are not reported.","incidentDate":"2024-01-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-16","aiSystem":"AI-synthesised audio, made with a tool the court account does not name, whose timbre, intonation and speech rhythm closely resembled the plaintiff's voice, set over clips of the plaintiff's public lectures in a livestream sales host's promotional short videos (court account)","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the Beijing Internet Court's account, AI-synthesised audio identifiable as an older educator's voice was used without consent, with clips of the educator's lectures, to sell books; the court found the person's portrait and voice rights infringed and ordered the commissioning company to apologise and compensate economic losses and costs.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the plaintiff whose voice and image the court found were used without authorisation (court account relayed by The Paper). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"elderly","jurisdiction":"CN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_34262393","primarySourceLabel":"The Paper, 16 October 2026: court case on AI-cloned voice of an older person used in livestream book sales","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-17T03:03:46.98321+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-17T03:03:46.98321+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["voice-cloning","voice-rights","portrait-rights","livestream-selling","court-ruling","older-people","beijing","china","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-taipei-ai-deepfake-nude-drug-photo-of-mayoral-candidate-resharer-deferred-prosecution","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'今年6月4日晚間9時18分，利用AI技術合成沈伯洋與裸露女子不實影像，再將照片擺放在疑似毒品施用器具的桌面上拍攝，營造沈涉及不良場所、吸毒及性行為的假象'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'製作沈伯洋與穿著裸露之不詳女子合照，照片中還有一張桌子，桌上還有不明白色粉末及疑似毒品施用器具，以此深度偽造不實的性影像'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"An X account posted a fabricated photo on 4 June 2026 showing Shen with a scantily dressed woman and apparent drug paraphernalia, implying drug use and sexual activity; prosecutors say the account used AI technology to synthesise it.","causal_attribution":"Prosecutors' decision as relayed by two outlets; the AI wording appears in the Liberty Times account, TaiSounds says computer synthesis or other technological methods."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'調查局使用深偽影像檢測軟體Reality Defender分析，結果顯示「發現深度偽造」'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'調查局先以深偽影音檢測軟體Reality Defender分析本案照片，結果顯示「發現深度偽造」。再以Resemble.AI及Media Integrity AI等多種科技工具複測，均判定為合成影像'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Investigation Bureau's analysis with Reality Defender returned 'deepfake detected', and re-tests with Resemble AI and Media Integrity AI found the image synthetic.","causal_attribution":"Forensic finding of the investigating agency, reported from the prosecutors' decision; detector outputs are probabilistic."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'沈伯洋發現後認為名譽嚴重受損，委任律師向法務部調查局台北市調查處提起告訴'; '於同年6月7日上午，在Threads瀏覽該張照片後，未經合理查證，即在其個人臉書公開張貼該照片'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'沈伯洋提出告訴後，案件由調查局台北市調查處偵辦'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Shen considered his reputation seriously damaged and filed a complaint through a lawyer with the Investigation Bureau's Taipei office after a 66-year-old man reshared the image on Facebook on 7 June with a real photo of him.","causal_attribution":"The complainant's position as recorded in the prosecutors' decision."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'緩起訴期間為2年。'; '接受地檢署法治教育10場次'; '告訴人沈伯洋已具狀表示同意緩起訴'; '檢調追查發現其IP位址位於中國，目前已另案深入偵辦中'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'已涉犯加重誹謗罪，考量他無前科、坦承犯行，接獲調查局通知後立即刪文，並公開道歉、澄清影像造假'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Prosecutors concluded that the resharer's reposting amounted to aggravated defamation and, citing his confession, deletion of the posts, public apology and Shen's written consent, deferred prosecution for two years with ten law-education sessions; the original X account, whose IP address was traced to China, is under separate investigation.","causal_attribution":"Prosecutorial decision as reported; the decision document itself was not inspected."}],"effects":[{"label":"a politician falsely depicted in an AI-synthesised sexualised, drug-related photo, reporting serious reputational damage","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/5603305","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh-Hant","translation_note":"Read in Traditional Chinese by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-12 and translated by that agent; no human translation. Liberty Times, 12 Oct 2026 10:45, HTTP 200; reports the deferred-prosecution decision in detail. A rated-content interstitial precedes the article text.","independence_group":"taipei-prosecutors-deferred-prosecution-decision"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.taisounds.com/news/content/97/293471","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh-Hant","translation_note":"Read in Traditional Chinese by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-12 and translated by that agent; no human translation. TaiSounds, 12 Oct 2026 10:29, HTTP 200; article text taken from the page body (the generic strip lost it). Same underlying decision as s1, so the same independence group.","independence_group":"taipei-prosecutors-deferred-prosecution-decision"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["justice","public_life"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool generated the image.","Who operates the original X account, and the outcome of the separate investigation.","Whether the woman shown in the image is a real person.","How widely the image circulated."],"geography":{"basis":"The depicted politician is a Taipei mayoral candidate, the resharer posted on Facebook and the complaint and decision were handled by the Investigation Bureau's Taipei office and the Taipei District Prosecutors Office. The original account's IP address was traced to China, which is not recorded as the event country because the posting location is not established.","court_countries":["TW"],"event_countries":["TW"],"affected_person_countries":["TW"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core depiction case: according to the Taipei prosecutors' decision reported by two outlets, an X account used AI to synthesise a sexualised, drug-related image of a named politician, the Investigation Bureau's detection tools found it to be a deepfake, the politician complained of serious reputational damage, and a resharer received a deferred prosecution for aggravated defamation. The politician is named as a public figure and the complainant; the resharer and the reposting accounts are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-12"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The prosecutors' decision, as reported by the Liberty Times, states that the X account used AI technology to synthesise the image of Shen with a nude woman, and the Investigation Bureau, which examined the image, reports a Reality Defender result of 'deepfake detected' confirmed by Resemble AI and Media Integrity AI. That generated image is the false depiction that was reshared and on which the complaint and the defamation finding rest (depicted_or_impersonated). TaiSounds describes the method only as computer synthesis or other technological methods.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Taipei prosecutors say an AI deepfake photo showed mayoral candidate Puma Shen with a nude woman and drug gear; a man who reshared it gets deferred prosecution","summary":"On the evening of 4 June 2026 an account on X posted a fabricated photo showing Puma Shen (沈伯洋), the Democratic Progressive Party's prospective candidate for Taipei mayor, beside a scantily dressed woman at a table with white powder and apparent drug paraphernalia, suggesting drug use and sex. According to the Taipei District Prosecutors Office decision reported by the Liberty Times and TaiSounds, the account used AI technology to synthesise the image, and it was then reposted by other accounts. On 7 June a 66-year-old man shared it on Facebook with a real photo of Shen and the comment 'does it look alike?'. Shen, who considered his reputation seriously damaged, filed a complaint with the Investigation Bureau's Taipei office, whose deepfake-detection software (Reality Defender) returned 'deepfake detected', and two further tools found the image synthetic. Prosecutors concluded that the man's reposting amounted to aggravated defamation; because he confessed, deleted the posts, published an apology and Shen agreed in writing, they deferred prosecution for two years on 12 October 2026 and ordered ten law-education sessions. The X account's IP address was traced to China and is under separate investigation. Shen is named as a public political figure and the complainant; the resharer is not named.","incidentDate":"2026-06-04","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-10-12","aiSystem":"An image that, according to the Taipei District Prosecutors Office decision as reported by the Liberty Times, an X account 'used AI technology to synthesise'; the Investigation Bureau's Reality Defender analysis returned 'deepfake detected' and re-tests with Resemble AI and Media Integrity AI found it synthetic. The generation tool is not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to Taipei prosecutors as reported by two Taiwanese outlets, an AI-synthesised photo falsely showed Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen with a nude woman and drug paraphernalia; Shen reported serious reputational damage and complained, and a man who reshared it received a two-year deferred prosecution for aggravated defamation.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: Shen, the depicted complainant who reported reputational damage. Shen did not use the tool, so is counted as another person harmed. The woman in the image is not identified and is not counted; viewers and reposters are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"TW","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/5603305","primarySourceLabel":"Liberty Times (自由時報), 12 Oct 2026: AI deepfake photo of Puma Shen, resharer gets deferred prosecution","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-12T03:23:17.888414+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-12T03:23:17.888414+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","ai-generated-image","politician","defamation","deferred-prosecution","taiwan","reputational-harm"]},{"id":"2026-china-ai-videos-impersonating-late-singer-liu-huans-widow-sell-health-powder","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'知名音乐家刘欢因病去世'; '以“刘老师老婆”为名发布视频'; '视频后半段则开始推荐一款名为“黄精五黑粉”的产品'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'冒充已故音乐家刘欢的家人兜售“黄精五黑粉”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"After Liu Huan's death on 25 September 2026, an account calling itself 'Teacher Liu's wife' posted videos claiming to be his widow, describing his final days over clips of his performances and then promoting a health powder.","causal_attribution":"Media observation of the videos, from one reporting chain."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'视频播放页面有小字标注“内容由AI生成”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'配以AI合成的“妻子”声音讲述临终情形'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Reporters noted that the playback page carried a small-print label saying the content was AI-generated, and Guancha reports that the 'wife' voice was AI-synthesised.","causal_attribution":"The label is the publisher's or platform's declaration observed by reporters; the voice description is Guancha's relay."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'上述视频获得数万网友点赞、上万次转发'; '但仍有不少人信以为真，留言安慰'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The video drew tens of thousands of likes and over ten thousand shares, and many viewers left condolences believing it genuine.","causal_attribution":"Reporters' observation of engagement figures and comments; not counts of harmed people."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'随后，记者联系当事社交平台，客服人员表示，需由权利人或其家人进行举报。'; '涉事的部分视频已被下架或由博主自行删除'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The shop told reporters it could not control the posters and the platform said a rights holder or family member had to report the videos; by 9 October some videos had been removed or deleted.","causal_attribution":"Responses given to reporters."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'已留言做出回应'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Guancha reports that the widow responded with a comment and shows a screenshot of comments under her name saying that, apart from WeChat Moments, she and Liu Huan have no social media, and asking people to share this so that he is not fabricated about.","causal_attribution":"Guancha's account and screenshot (Jiangsu News watermark); ThePaper quotes the same social-media sentence from a statement made after Liu Huan's death, so the comment's timing relative to the videos is not established."}],"effects":[{"label":"a bereaved widow impersonated in AI-generated videos that used her husband's death to sell a product","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_34223499","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh-Hans","translation_note":"Read in Simplified Chinese by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-12 and translated by that agent; no human translation. ThePaper account of Tianjin Broadcasting, 10 Oct 2026 08:38, HTTP 200; compiles reporting credited to ThePaper, China Youth Daily and Jimu News.","independence_group":"jimu-cyd-reporting-liu-huan-impersonation"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.guancha.cn/ZhengZhi/2026_10_11_903878.shtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh-Hans","translation_note":"Read in Simplified Chinese by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-12 and translated by that agent; no human translation. Guancha, 11 Oct 2026 14:28, HTTP 200; compiles Jiangsu News and CCTV.com reports, which rest on the same reporting about the videos, shop and platform; it alone reports the widow's response and the AI-synthesised voice.","independence_group":"jimu-cyd-reporting-liu-huan-impersonation"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.jiemian.com/video/AGUCMQhvB2QBOlVm.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh-Hans","translation_note":"Read in Simplified Chinese by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-12 and translated by that agent; no human translation. Jiemian video page, 9 Oct 2026 (Google News date; the page shows a relative date), HTTP 200; a short caption crediting Jimu News.","independence_group":"jimu-cyd-reporting-liu-huan-impersonation"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life","commerce"],"unknowns":["The platform, the posters and the AI tool used.","Whether the widow's comment shown by Guancha responded to these videos or was her earlier statement about rumours.","Whether the synthetic voice or the on-camera figure imitated her real voice or appearance.","Whether any viewer bought the product because of the videos."],"geography":{"basis":"The videos were on a social platform covered by Chinese national media, sold a product through a mainland shop whose registration Guancha reports, and the platform and shop responded to Chinese reporters. The widow's country of residence is not stated in the inspected bodies.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["CN"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core impersonation case: Chinese media report AI-labelled videos presenting a narrator as the late musician Liu Huan's widow to sell a health powder, viewers believed them, the widow is reported to have responded, and some videos were removed. Liu Huan is named as a public figure; the widow is not named; the death itself has no reported AI connection.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-12"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Reporters for Jimu News and China Youth Daily (compiled on ThePaper) observed that the videos' playback page carried the label 'content generated by AI', and Guancha describes an AI-synthesised voice of the 'wife' narrating Liu Huan's final days. The generated videos presented themselves as the widow speaking, which is the impersonation she responded to (depicted_or_impersonated). The label is the publisher's or platform's own declaration; the tool is not named and no forensic analysis is reported.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Chinese media report AI-generated videos impersonating the late singer Liu Huan's widow to sell a health powder; she responded and some videos were removed","summary":"After the musician Liu Huan died on 25 September 2026, videos appeared on a Chinese social platform in which an account calling itself 'Teacher Liu's wife' claimed to be his widow, described his final days over clips of his performances, and then promoted a health powder through a shopping link. According to reporting by Jimu News and China Youth Daily compiled by Tianjin Broadcasting on ThePaper, the playback page carried a small-print label saying the content was AI-generated, yet the videos drew tens of thousands of likes and more than ten thousand shares, and many viewers left condolences believing them genuine. Another account posed as Liu Huan's son and sold the same product. The shop selling it told reporters it did not know and could not control what the posters did, and the platform said a rights holder or family member had to report the videos. Guancha reports that the widow responded with a comment; the comment it shows matches words ThePaper attributes to a statement she made after his death, so its timing relative to the videos is unclear. By 9 October some videos had been taken down or deleted by their posters. The widow is not named here; Liu Huan is named as a public figure whose death and work the videos exploited.","incidentDate":"2026-09-25","incidentEndDate":"2026-10-09","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-10-09","aiSystem":"Short videos on an unnamed Chinese social platform whose playback pages carried the small-print label 'content generated by AI' (内容由AI生成), according to reporters; Guancha describes an AI-synthesised voice of the 'wife' narrating over clips of Liu Huan's performances, and ThePaper quotes the narrator as speaking to camera. The generation tool is not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to Chinese media reports, AI-generated videos impersonated the widow of the late singer Liu Huan to sell a health powder through shopping links, drawing tens of thousands of likes; she responded, and some videos were removed.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"One person counted: the widow, who was impersonated and whom Guancha reports responded with a comment saying she and Liu Huan have no social media (its timing relative to the videos is not established). Viewers who believed the videos are an unquantified remainder; likes, shares and the son's impersonation (no reported response) are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_34223499","primarySourceLabel":"ThePaper (Tianjin Broadcasting), 10 Oct 2026: confirmed, not Liu Huan's wife; AI videos impersonating his family sell goods","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-12T03:23:14.193117+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-12T03:23:14.193117+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-generated-video","impersonation","deceased-celebrity","product-promotion","china","reputational-harm"]},{"id":"2025-case-report-deepseek-guided-fever-self-diagnosis-unsupervised-colchicine-liver-enzymes","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Since early childhood, he had experienced recurrent inflammatory attacks characterized by fever, severe migratory abdominal pain, arthralgia involving the knees, feet and hips, lower-limb myalgia, and intermittent erythematous skin lesions.'; 'Despite almost 3 decades of symptoms, extensive investigations, including contrast-enhanced abdominal CT and MRI, gastroscopy, colonoscopy, and urological assessment, failed to establish a diagnosis.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A man in his thirties had had recurrent febrile attacks since early childhood, and nearly three decades of investigations had produced no diagnosis.","causal_attribution":"The patient's history as taken and written up by the treating clinicians."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'the patient began a dialogue with the publicly available LLM (DeepSeek-R1-0528) on June 28, 2025.'; 'FMF was presented as the leading diagnosis'; 'Although the model continued to recommend rheumatological assessment and MEFV testing, its language became increasingly confident, at times describing the presentation as classic or highly suggestive of FMF. It also repeatedly discussed a diagnostic trial of colchicine and provided specific dosing suggestions before specialist assessment.'; 'it explicitly advised that colchicine should only be initiated with specialist approval and appropriate laboratory monitoring.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In a dialogue with DeepSeek-R1-0528 begun on 28 June 2025, the model came to present familial Mediterranean fever as the leading diagnosis in increasingly confident language and repeatedly discussed a diagnostic trial of colchicine with specific dosing before specialist assessment, while also recommending specialist evaluation and, in its final reply on his other medication, advising colchicine only with specialist approval and monitoring.","causal_attribution":"The authors' description of the conversation, which they include as a supplement that was not inspected here."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Motivated by the LLM-generated diagnostic hypothesis, the patient independently obtained commercial genetic MEFV testing at Alfa Labs, Egypt, which identified 2 pathogenic MEFV variants'; 'Before specialist assessment, he obtained colchicine himself from a pharmacy in Egypt and initiated treatment at a dose of 0.5 mg twice daily without prior specialist supervision.'; 'the patient nevertheless translated the generated diagnostic hypothesis into autonomous genetic testing and self-medication.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Motivated by the model's hypothesis, he arranged commercial genetic testing in Egypt, which found two pathogenic MEFV variants, and obtained colchicine from a pharmacy in Egypt, starting 0.5 mg twice daily without specialist supervision.","causal_attribution":"The patient's account as reported by the treating clinicians; the authors state the motivation."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Following colchicine initiation, recurrent febrile attacks ceased completely for the first time since childhood. However, alanine aminotransferase increased to 160 U/L. In view of the elevated liver enzymes, colchicine was temporarily discontinued, and liver enzyme levels were monitored closely by the primary care physician.'; 'colchicine treatment was resumed at a dose of 0.5 mg/d under close supervision.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"After he started colchicine his febrile attacks ceased, but his alanine aminotransferase rose to 160 U/L; colchicine was temporarily discontinued under primary-care monitoring and later resumed at 0.5 mg daily under close supervision.","causal_attribution":"Clinical course reported by the authors; the liver tests were monitored by his primary care physician."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Based on the characteristic lifelong clinical phenotype, Mediterranean ancestry, suggestive family history, identification of 2 pathogenic MEFV variants, and clinical response to colchicine, the diagnosis of FMF was confirmed'; 'The patient has remained free of attacks with regular clinical and laboratory follow-up.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"At the authors' clinic in February 2026 the diagnosis of familial Mediterranean fever was confirmed, and he has remained free of attacks under follow-up.","causal_attribution":"The treating specialists' own diagnostic finding, directly recorded in their report."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'although the model consistently recommended specialist evaluation before treatment initiation, the patient nevertheless translated the generated diagnostic hypothesis into autonomous genetic testing and self-medication. The subsequent elevation of liver enzymes illustrates that even clinically accurate diagnostic suggestions may inadvertently encourage harmful behavior if patients perceive the model as sufficiently authoritative.'; 'generic recommendations to seek specialist advice may not sufficiently mitigate risk when they are accompanied by confident diagnostic language and actionable treatment instructions'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The authors write that, although the model consistently recommended specialist evaluation, the patient turned its hypothesis into autonomous testing and self-medication, that the liver-enzyme rise shows accurate suggestions can encourage harmful behaviour when the model seems authoritative, and that generic advice to see a specialist may not mitigate risk alongside confident language and actionable treatment instructions.","causal_attribution":"The authors' interpretation of the model's role; the model also advised specialist supervision, so causation is alleged."}],"effects":[{"label":"liver enzyme rise during colchicine self-treatment started without specialist supervision, so the drug was paused","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"},{"label":"attacks stopped and a long-missed diagnosis was later confirmed by specialists","claim_id":"c5","direction":"positive"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13651492/fullTextXML","kind":"clinical_case_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Full text of the peer-reviewed case report read as Europe PMC fullTextXML for PMC13651492 (HTTP 200) on 2026-10-12: abstract, case description, discussion, consent and AI-use declarations. Written by the treating clinicians. The supplementary DeepSeek conversation was not inspected.","independence_group":"eular-rheumatol-open-pauz-2026-case-report"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["health"],"unknowns":["What DeepSeek replied in each turn; the supplementary transcript was not inspected.","Where the patient held the dialogue and where his liver enzymes were monitored.","Whether the liver-enzyme rise had any cause other than colchicine, including the other long-term medication he was taking; the report does not discuss alternatives."],"geography":{"basis":"The report says the patient obtained the genetic test at a laboratory in Egypt and the colchicine from a pharmacy in Egypt (EG). It does not say where he held the DeepSeek dialogue or where his liver enzymes were monitored. He later presented to the authors' clinic in Hamburg; that confirmation visit is not used as the event location, and birthplace is not used as residence. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["EG"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Core case (communicated_with): the treating clinicians report that a DeepSeek dialogue presented a rare fever syndrome as the leading diagnosis with specific colchicine dosing, and that the patient then self-medicated without supervision and developed a liver-enzyme rise that led to a pause in treatment. The account is mixed: the model also advised specialist supervision and the patient's attacks stopped, so causation is alleged and severity low.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-12"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The treating clinicians, who include the full conversation as a supplement, report that DeepSeek-R1-0528 progressively presented familial Mediterranean fever as the leading diagnosis in increasingly confident language and repeatedly discussed a diagnostic colchicine trial with specific dosing before specialist assessment, and that the patient, motivated by that hypothesis, arranged genetic testing and started colchicine unsupervised, after which his liver enzymes rose. They also report that the model repeatedly advised specialist supervision.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Case report: man self-treated with colchicine after a DeepSeek dialogue pointed to a rare fever syndrome; liver enzymes rose before specialist review","summary":"Clinicians at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf report in EULAR Rheumatology Open (published 29 September 2026) a man in his thirties with nearly three decades of unexplained febrile attacks who, in a dialogue with DeepSeek begun on 28 June 2025, saw the model's differential narrow to familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). The authors write that the model repeatedly recommended specialist assessment but also discussed a diagnostic trial of colchicine with specific dosing. Motivated by the hypothesis, he arranged commercial genetic testing and obtained colchicine from a pharmacy in Egypt, starting it without specialist supervision. His attacks stopped, but his alanine aminotransferase rose to 160 U/L and colchicine was paused and later resumed at a lower dose. FMF was confirmed when he presented to the clinic in February 2026. The authors write that the case illustrates how patient-facing models may facilitate recognition of rare autoinflammatory diseases, and that confident diagnostic language combined with actionable treatment advice may also encourage unsupervised testing and self-medication.","incidentDate":"2025-06-28","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-09-29","aiSystem":"DeepSeek (DeepSeek-R1-0528, the publicly available model), used by the patient in an iterative diagnostic dialogue (case report by the treating clinicians)","aiProduct":"DeepSeek","aiCompany":"DeepSeek","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["medical_deterioration"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The treating clinicians report that after the DeepSeek dialogue the patient started colchicine without specialist supervision and his alanine aminotransferase rose to 160 U/L, so the drug was paused and resumed at a lower dose; they also report that his attacks stopped and that the diagnosis was later confirmed.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One patient, the subject of the case report. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13651492/fullTextXML","primarySourceLabel":"EULAR Rheumatology Open, 29 September 2026: Pauz et al., LLM-supported self-diagnosis and self-treatment of FMF (case report, Europe PMC full text)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-12T03:14:06.074846+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-12T03:14:06.074846+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepseek","case-report","self-medication","self-diagnosis","colchicine","rare-disease","communicated-with"]},{"id":"2025-shanghai-voice-actor-ai-synthesised-voice-company-promotion-appeal-ruling","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'2026年9月29日，上海市第一中级人民法院依法审结上海首例人工智能合成语音引发的自然人声音权益保护纠纷案件，判决平台运营方构成声音侵权，赔偿权利人经济损失5万元'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'上海市第一中级人民法院依法判决：驳回上诉，维持原判'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'驳回上诉，维持原判'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'经上海市第一中级人民法院二审，于2026年9月29日驳回上诉，维持原判'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On 29 September 2026 the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court concluded a voice-rights case arising from AI-synthesised speech, described as the first in Shanghai, holding that the platform operator infringed and must pay 50,000 yuan for economic loss; the appeals were dismissed and the first-instance judgment upheld.","causal_attribution":"Court outcome as relayed by outlets citing the court; the judgment was not inspected."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'2025年1月'; '从好友处了解到'; 'A公司在其互联网推广拉新活动中疑似使用了'; '该活动使用的自己声音疑似AI合成，于是对相关音频进行了公证以固定证据'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In January 2025 the voice actor learned from a friend that Company A appeared to be using the voice actor's voice in an online user-acquisition promotion, judged the audio to be AI-synthesised and had it notarised before suing.","causal_attribution":"The claimant's case as summarised in the court account."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'其从未与A公司进行过合作和任何授权，A公司擅自使用其声音构成侵权，遂要求A公司停止侵权并赔偿经济损失30万元'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The voice actor said there had been no cooperation with or authorisation of Company A and asked the court to stop the use and award 300,000 yuan.","causal_attribution":"The claimant's position as summarised in the court account."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'A公司辩称，案涉音频确为该公司开发的AI生成，但具体的来源和投喂的素材因前员工离职无法确认'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Company A said the audio was generated by AI the company had developed, but that its source and the material fed to the system could not be confirmed because a former employee had left.","causal_attribution":"The company's defence as summarised in the court account; the company denied using the voice actor's voice."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'在28个共振峰声学指标中'; '有24个偏离度小于10%，其中16个小于5.36%，两者较为相似及高度相似的部分达到90%'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A forensic comparison found that 24 of 28 formant indicators deviated by less than 10 percent and that the parts rated fairly or highly similar reached 90 percent.","causal_attribution":"Forensic opinion as summarised in the court account."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'A公司的行为构成人工智能生成声音侵权'; '赔偿5万元'; '双方均不服一审判决，提起上诉'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'并向长宁区人民法院提出起诉'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The first-instance court awarded 50,000 yuan and both sides appealed; the Legal Daily report carried on Sina Finance says the claim was filed in the Changning District People's Court.","causal_attribution":"Procedural history as relayed from the court account."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'未经自然人同意，使用自然人的声音作为训练语料，模仿该自然人的音色、语调和发音风格等生成能够识别该自然人的合成人声，应当认定侵害自然人声音权益'; '应承担举证不能的不利后果'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The appeal court held that using a person's voice as training material without consent to generate an identifiable synthetic voice infringes that person's voice rights, and that Company A bore the consequence of failing to prove the lawful source of its material.","causal_attribution":"The appeal court's reasoning as relayed; it rests on a presumption from similarity and access, because the company did not produce its training records."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'涉案语音上架持续时间较短，属流程播报提示音效'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The appeal court noted that the audio was online for a short time and was a process prompt sound in the promotion.","causal_attribution":"The appeal court's reasoning on the amount, as relayed."}],"effects":[{"label":"courts reported to have found a voice actor's voice identifiable in AI-synthesised audio used without consent in a company promotion","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://news.ifeng.com/c/8woTv1MjTRx","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"The Paper's article as carried on ifeng, read in the original Chinese on 2026-10-05 (HTTP 200). English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. Relays the Shanghai High People's Court WeChat account; the judgment itself was not inspected.","independence_group":"shanghai-no1-intermediate-court-release"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://news.qq.com/rain/a/20260929A0C6NK00","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Southern Metropolis Daily N Video on Tencent News, read in Chinese on 2026-10-05 (HTTP 200). English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. The reporter cites the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court; same court account as s1.","independence_group":"shanghai-no1-intermediate-court-release"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/jjxw/2026-09-29/doc-initpatz6144930.shtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Legal Daily article carried on Sina Finance, read in the original Chinese on 2026-10-05 (HTTP 200). English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. Same court account with the first-instance court named and a judge's commentary.","independence_group":"shanghai-no1-intermediate-court-release"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["Which company and which speech-synthesis product were involved; the court account anonymises both.","When the promotion began and how long the audio was in use.","Whether the company used the voice actor's recordings as training material; the court presumed it because the company did not prove otherwise.","The dates of the filing and of the first-instance judgment.","Where the voice actor lives."],"geography":{"basis":"The case was decided by the Changning District People's Court and the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court in China. The reports anonymise the company and the app and do not say where the company is based, where its online promotion ran or where the voice actor lives, so no event or affected-person country is recorded.","court_countries":["CN"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): the Shanghai courts found that a company imitated a voice actor's voice with AI-synthesised audio in a promotion without consent and awarded 50,000 yuan. One reporting chain (the court's release, read in three Chinese outlets); the parties are anonymised by the court.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"In the court account, the company said the audio was generated by AI it had developed, and both courts found AI-generated voice infringement. The audio imitated the voice actor's voice (depicted_or_impersonated). The company denied using the voice actor's recordings; the appeal court relied on a forensic similarity report and on the company's failure to prove the source of its training material.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Shanghai: an appeal court upheld a 50,000 yuan award to a voice actor after finding that AI-synthesised audio in a company's online promotion was identifiable as the voice actor's voice","summary":"Chinese outlets reported on 29 September 2026, citing the Shanghai courts, that the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court had concluded what it called Shanghai's first voice-rights case arising from AI-synthesised speech. According to the court's account, a voice actor who publishes work on an app learned from a friend in January 2025 that a company appeared to be using the voice actor's voice in an online user-acquisition promotion, judged the audio to be AI-synthesised, had it notarised and sued for 300,000 yuan. The company said the audio was generated by AI it had developed but that the training material could not be confirmed, and denied using the voice actor's voice. A forensic comparison rated about 90 percent of the measured features as fairly or highly similar. The first-instance court awarded 50,000 yuan and both sides appealed. The appeal court held that the company had put an identifiable synthetic voice to commercial use without consent, dismissed the appeals and upheld the award.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-29","aiSystem":"AI speech synthesis developed by the defendant company (anonymised as Company A in the court account), which the courts found had generated audio imitating the voice actor's voice for an online promotion","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the court's account as relayed by Chinese outlets, the Shanghai courts found that AI-synthesised audio used in a company's online promotion was identifiable as a voice actor's voice and had been used without consent, causing economic loss, and awarded 50,000 yuan.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the voice actor who brought the claim (court account relayed by The Paper, Southern Metropolis Daily and Legal Daily). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://news.ifeng.com/c/8woTv1MjTRx","primarySourceLabel":"The Paper via ifeng, 29 September 2026: AI took a voice actor's voice, company ordered to pay 50,000 yuan","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-05T03:16:35.611187+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T03:16:35.611187+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["voice-cloning","voice-rights","voice-actor","court-ruling","shanghai","china","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-ibague-colombia-ring-ai-altered-faces-voices-video-calls-fake-us-visa-fraud","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'desarticuló en Ibagué una red transnacional señalada de estafar a ciudadanos de siete países con falsas visas y permisos de residencia para Estados Unidos'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'fueron capturadas en flagrancia cinco personas y se realizaron tres diligencias de allanamiento'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Dijín, with the Fiscalía, dismantled in Ibagué a ring accused of defrauding citizens of seven countries with fake visas and residence permits for the United States; five people were captured in flagrante and three searches were carried out.","causal_attribution":"Police and prosecution account; the accusations have not been tested in court."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Mediante la modalidad de DeepFace alteraban sus rostros y acentos durante las videollamadas, logrando suplantar con alta fidelidad a funcionarios consulares y miembros de agencias gubernamentales estadounidenses'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Mediante la modalidad de DeepFace, alteraban sus rostros y acentos durante las videollamadas, logrando suplantar con alta fidelidad a funcionarios consulares y miembros de agencias gubernamentales estadounidenses'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'alterar por completo los rostros, las expresiones, las voces y hasta los acentos en videollamadas'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Dijín director said members altered their faces and accents during video calls and so impersonated consular officials and members of US government agencies. El País (Cali) describes the technology as altering faces, expressions, voices and accents in video calls.","causal_attribution":"Statement of the police director quoted by Caracol Radio and Semana and paraphrased by El País (Cali); no forensic detail is reported."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'chatbots para la atención inicial de las víctimas, síntesis y clonación de voz, además de videos manipulados para suplantar identidades'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the police, the ring also used chatbots for first contact with victims, voice synthesis and cloning, and manipulated videos.","causal_attribution":"Police description relayed by Caracol Radio."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Esta banda delincuencial habría estafado a más de 500 ciudadanos de siete países mediante la suplantación de funcionarios estadounidenses'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'los implicados habrían manipulado de forma fraudulenta a más de 500 ciudadanos'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Semana and El País (Cali) report that more than 500 citizens are said to have been defrauded or manipulated by the ring.","causal_attribution":"A figure attributed to the investigation and stated conditionally by both outlets."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'la red procedía a exigir cobros económicos que oscilaban entre los 500 y los 2.000 dólares'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"El País (Cali) reports that the ring demanded payments of between 500 and 2,000 dollars once trust was established.","causal_attribution":"Reported by one outlet from the investigation."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'la red afectaba a ciudadanos de Costa Rica, Ecuador, Estados Unidos, Guatemala, Honduras, México y Perú'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'alcanzando a víctimas ubicadas en Estados Unidos, Honduras, Guatemala, Perú, México, Ecuador y Costa Rica'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"According to the authorities, the people affected were citizens of Costa Rica, Ecuador, the United States, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and Peru; El País (Cali) describes victims located in those countries.","causal_attribution":"Police account relayed by the outlets."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Tres de ellos fueron presentados ante un juez de control de garantías, que legalizó sus capturas'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'falsedad personal agravada por uso de inteligencia artificial'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Caracol Radio reports that three of those captured were brought before a judge who legalised the captures, and that prosecutors charged them with offences including personal falsehood aggravated by the use of artificial intelligence.","causal_attribution":"Charges are allegations; no court record was read."}],"effects":[{"label":"police say people seeking US visas were defrauded by callers posing as consular officials with AI-altered faces and accents","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://caracol.com.co/2026/07/12/cae-red-en-ibague-que-usaba-ia-para-estafar-con-falsas-visas-a-eeuu/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Spanish-language body read in the original on 2026-10-05 by the research agent (an AI). Passages are quoted verbatim in Spanish. English assertions are the agent's own translation and no human translator reviewed them. Caracol Radio, 12 July 2026; relays the police announcement and quotes the Dijín director.","independence_group":"policia-dijin-ibague-visa-ring-statement"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.elpais.com.co/judicial/cae-en-ibague-banda-que-utilizaba-inteligencia-artificial-para-estafar-con-falsas-visas-1412.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Spanish-language body read in the original on 2026-10-05 by the research agent (an AI). Passages are quoted verbatim in Spanish. English assertions are the agent's own translation and no human translator reviewed them. El País (Cali), 14 July 2026; same police announcement.","independence_group":"policia-dijin-ibague-visa-ring-statement"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.semana.com/nacion/articulo/cayo-red-que-usaba-inteligencia-artificial-para-estafar-a-ciudadanos-en-los-tramites-de-la-visa/202648/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Spanish-language body read in the original on 2026-10-05 by the research agent (an AI). Passages are quoted verbatim in Spanish. English assertions are the agent's own translation and no human translator reviewed them. Semana, 13 July 2026; same police announcement.","independence_group":"policia-dijin-ibague-visa-ring-statement"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["finance","public_services"],"unknowns":["When the fraud began; the reports date only the operation and say the investigation lasted six months.","How many of the people defrauded took part in a video call with an altered face or voice.","The total amount lost.","Which software was used; Semana says police experts identified it and does not name it.","The outcome of the criminal case."],"geography":{"basis":"The ring operated from properties in Ibagué, where the searches and captures took place, and three people were brought before a Colombian judge (Caracol Radio). El País (Cali) describes victims located in the United States, Honduras, Guatemala, Peru, Mexico, Ecuador and Costa Rica. Caracol Radio and Semana call the people affected citizens of those countries, which is nationality; only El País (Cali) describes them as located there.","court_countries":["CO"],"event_countries":["CO"],"affected_person_countries":["CR","EC","US","GT","HN","MX","PE"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case: according to Colombian police, callers used AI-altered faces and voices in video calls, and chatbots, to defraud people seeking US visas. One reporting chain (the police and prosecution announcement) relayed by three outlets, so every claim stays reported. The people captured are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The Dijín director is quoted saying members altered their faces and accents during video calls (Caracol Radio; Semana), and police list chatbots, voice synthesis and cloning and manipulated videos. The altered video calls and chatbots were channels through which targets were spoken to (communicated_with). Semana reports that experts of the police cyber centre identified and neutralised the AI software allegedly used for the impersonations; no body names it, and no forensic report or court finding is cited.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Colombia: police dismantle a ring in Ibagué accused of defrauding people in seven countries with fake US visas, using AI to alter faces and voices in video calls and pose as consular officials","summary":"Colombian police (Dijín) and prosecutors announced in July 2026 that they had dismantled a ring in Ibagué accused of defrauding citizens of seven countries with fake visas and residence permits for the United States. Five people were captured during three searches. The Dijín director said members altered their faces and accents during video calls to pose as consular officials and members of US government agencies; police also described chatbots for first contact, voice cloning and manipulated videos. Semana and El País (Cali) report that more than 500 people are said to have been defrauded, and El País says the ring demanded payments of between 500 and 2,000 dollars. Three of those captured were charged, according to Caracol Radio.","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-07-12","aiSystem":"Face- and accent-altering software used in live video calls (police call the method DeepFace), with chatbots for first contact, voice synthesis and cloning and manipulated videos, as described by Colombian police; no product is identified","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Police and prosecutors say the ring defrauded people seeking US visas, said in the conditional by Semana and El País (Cali) to number more than 500, with payments of 500 to 2,000 dollars demanded (El País, Cali).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"No reliable count. The authorities say the ring defrauded citizens of seven countries (Caracol Radio; Semana) and give no number in those statements. Semana and El País (Cali) give more than 500 only in the conditional (habría estafado; habrían manipulado), and no body says how many paid or how many took part in a video call with an altered face or voice. Unquantified, with zero placeholders.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"CO","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://caracol.com.co/2026/07/12/cae-red-en-ibague-que-usaba-ia-para-estafar-con-falsas-visas-a-eeuu/","primarySourceLabel":"Caracol Radio, 12 July 2026: Cae red en Ibagué que usaba IA para estafar con falsas visas a EE.UU.","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-05T03:13:55.990498+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T03:13:55.990498+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfakes","video-call-impersonation","voice-cloning","visa-fraud","fraud-ring","colombia","ibague","communicated-with"]},{"id":"2026-shanghai-fake-army-officer-suspected-face-swap-video-call-800000-yuan-investment-fraud","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'通过相亲平台认识了自称'; '是即将退役的部队团长。为博取信任，他陆续发来军官证、身份证等看似真实的证件照片。'; '今年5月，上海的'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In May 2026 a Shanghai woman met through a matchmaking platform a man who said he was an army regiment commander about to retire and who sent officer and identity card photos.","causal_attribution":"Victim's account as reported; the man's identity is unknown."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'男子刻意用手快速遮挡面部'; '以此证明自己没用AI换脸技术'; '其实还是能辨别这个是不是AI技术合成的，被害人截图中，对方的大拇指是明显长于正常人的。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In a video call the man deliberately covered his face quickly with his hand to show he was not using AI face-swap, and a Pudong police anti-fraud officer said that AI synthesis can still be detected and that in the victim's screenshot the man's thumb was clearly longer than a normal person's.","causal_attribution":"The officer's remark points to an AI-synthesis artefact in this case but stops short of a direct finding; AI involvement is recorded as suspected."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'四处借钱，开设了账户，先后投入了80万元。'; '80万其实都是借的，我只有1万'; '却发现钱款无法提现'; '在高额回报的诱惑下'; '短短一个月内 在虚假投资平台投了80万元'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Lured by promised high returns, she borrowed widely and put 800,000 yuan into a fake investment platform within about a month, saying she had only 10,000 yuan of her own, and found she could not withdraw it.","causal_attribution":"The loss followed the fake investment pitch; the report does not attribute it to the video call alone."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'那时候鉴定出来军官证，身份证都是真的。'; '是鉴定照片里有没有AI合成的痕迹，并不能验证比如身份证或者军官证是否是真实的'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"She had checked the officer and identity card photos with the National Anti-Fraud Center app's AI identification function, which found them genuine; the police officer said that function only checks photos for traces of AI synthesis and cannot verify a document.","causal_attribution":"Context on how her doubts were allayed; the police describe a misunderstanding of the tool's purpose."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'她这才认清骗局，选择报警。'; '目前案件在进一步侦办中。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"She reported the fraud to police and the case was under further investigation.","causal_attribution":"Reported case status; no suspect is identified."}],"effects":[{"label":"lost 800,000 yuan, almost all borrowed, to a fake investment platform","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.21jingji.com/article/20260623/herald/8627b80122b0ac840159ebbfc75f2433.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read live in Simplified Chinese on 2026-10-04 (21jingji.com, 23 June 2026, credited Guangming Online; source line names the Xinmin Evening News WeChat account, News Square and CCTV News). The original items were not found. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"xinmin-xinwenfang-cctv-2026-06"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["relationships","finance"],"unknowns":["Whether face-swap or other AI video synthesis was in fact used in the video call; no forensic finding is reported.","The original Xinmin Evening News, News Square and CCTV News items and their publication dates.","Where the scammer operated and whether anyone has been identified or any money recovered."],"geography":{"basis":"The report describes the woman as in Shanghai and quotes the Pudong public security sub-bureau and the local police station that visited her. Where the scammer operated is not stated. No court is involved.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["CN"],"affected_person_countries":["CN"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case with AI involvement recorded as suspected: a Pudong police officer, discussing this case, pointed to an AI-synthesis artefact in the victim's screenshot of the scammer. The account rests on one report chain relayed by 21jingji.com from Guangming Online. The victim is identified only by the report's pseudonym, which is not repeated here.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-04"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The man staged a hand-over-face gesture in a video call to show he was not using AI face-swap. A Pudong police anti-fraud officer, discussing this case, said AI synthesis can still be detected and that in the victim's screenshot the man's thumb was clearly longer than normal. The report does not state outright that face-swap software was used, and no tool or forensic finding is reported.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"China: Shanghai woman loses 800,000 yuan to a fake army officer met on a matchmaking platform; Pudong police point to a sign of AI synthesis in her screenshot of him","summary":"In May 2026 a 50-year-old woman in Shanghai met a man on a matchmaking platform who said he was an army regiment commander about to retire and sent officer and identity card photos. He also made a video call on his own initiative, in which he quickly covered his face with his hand to show he was not using AI face-swap. He then steered her into a fake investment platform, and within about a month she put in 800,000 yuan, almost all of it borrowed, and could not withdraw it. A Pudong police anti-fraud officer said that AI synthesis could still be detected and that in her screenshot the man's thumb was clearly longer than a normal person's. The report gives no direct statement that face-swap software was used. The case was under further investigation.","incidentDate":"2026-05-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-06-23","aiSystem":"Suspected face-swap or AI video synthesis in a video call (Pudong police officer's remark on the victim's screenshot); no tool named","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool (suspected)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A Shanghai woman put 800,000 yuan, almost all borrowed, into a fake investment platform promoted by a man posing as an army officer; a Pudong police officer pointed to a sign of AI synthesis in the victim's screenshot of him (21jingji, relaying Guangming Online).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One woman lost 800,000 yuan (21jingji). People from whom she borrowed are not counted because the report does not describe harm to them.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.21jingji.com/article/20260623/herald/8627b80122b0ac840159ebbfc75f2433.html","primarySourceLabel":"21jingji.com (credited Guangming Online), 23 June 2026: 70后女子1个月被骗80万元","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-04T03:29:44.842458+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-04T03:29:44.842458+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["romance-scam","investment-fraud","face-swap","video-call","military-impersonation","shanghai","china","communicated-with"]},{"id":"2026-yoona-ai-pregnancy-composite-images-sm-criminal-complaint","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'앞서 온라인 커뮤니티와 SNS 등에는 윤아의 얼굴을 무단으로 합성한 사진이 급속도로 퍼졌다.'; '해당 게시물에는 윤아가 배가 부른 모습으로 등장하며, 얼굴은 모자이크 처리된 한 남성이 윤아의 배 위에 손을 얹는 모습이 연출돼 논란이 일었다.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'최근 윤아의 초상을 무단으로 합성한 불법 AI 생성 이미지와 이를 바탕으로 한 허위사실이 무분별하게 제작·유포되고 있는 상황을 추가적으로 확인했다'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'특히 해당 이미지 게시자가 윤아의 실제 SNS 계정을 태그해 사진을 게재하기도 했다'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"AI-generated images synthesising the face of YoonA (Im Yoon-ah) of Girls' Generation, showing her apparently pregnant with a man touching her belly, spread on social media and online communities together with false claims based on them.","causal_attribution":"The images are described by her agency as illegal AI-generated composites; their creators are not identified."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'이를 바탕으로 이미 형사고소를 진행하였고, 어떠한 선처나 합의 없이 강경하게 대응할 예정입니다.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'이를 바탕으로 이미 형사고소를 진행했고, 어떠한 선처나 합의 없이 강경하게 대응할 예정'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Her agency SM Entertainment said on 28 September 2026 that it had already filed a criminal complaint on the basis of evidence gathered from fan reports and monitoring, and would respond without leniency or settlement.","causal_attribution":"Agency statement; no police action or suspect is reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"fabricated AI images depicting her as pregnant spread online with false claims about her","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.starnewskorea.com/star/2026/09/28/2026092819154494314","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ko","translation_note":"Read live in Korean on 2026-09-29 (Star News, 28 September 2026); reproduces the full SM Entertainment statement. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"sm-entertainment-statement"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.segye.com/newsView/20260928517569","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ko","translation_note":"Read live in Korean on 2026-09-29 (Segye Ilbo, 28 September 2026); relays the same statement. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"sm-entertainment-statement"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.spotvnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=1010237","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ko","translation_note":"Read live in Korean on 2026-09-29 (29 September 2026); relays the statement and adds career background. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"sm-entertainment-statement"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["When the images first appeared and on which platforms.","Who made them and with what tool.","The police agency handling the complaint and any investigation outcome."],"geography":{"basis":"YoonA is a Korean singer and actor with a Korean drama and film career (SPOTV News) represented by SM Entertainment, whose statement cites Korean statutes (Star News). Where the images were made or first posted is not stated, and the authority receiving the complaint is not named, so no event or court country is recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["KR"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case (AI-generated images depicting a real, named public figure in a fabricated pregnancy, circulated with false claims). The account rests on her agency's statement, relayed by several Korean outlets; YoonA is a public figure and the subject of the statement. The images are not reproduced or described beyond the agency's description.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"SM Entertainment's statement describes the images as illegal AI-generated images synthesising her likeness (Star News; Segye Ilbo). No tool is named and no forensic analysis is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"South Korea: AI-generated images depicting Girls' Generation's YoonA as pregnant spread online with false claims; her agency SM Entertainment says it has already filed a criminal complaint","summary":"SM Entertainment said on 28 September 2026 that illegal AI-generated images synthesising the likeness of YoonA (Im Yoon-ah), singer and actor of Girls' Generation, and false claims built on them had been made and spread on social media and online communities. Korean outlets describe images showing her apparently pregnant with a man placing a hand on her belly (his face blurred, per Star News). The agency said it had collected evidence from fan reports to its KWANGYA 119 channel and monitoring, had already filed a criminal complaint, and would respond without leniency or settlement, warning that making, posting or re-sharing the images could breach Korean defamation, portrait-rights and sexual-crime (false video) provisions.","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-28","aiSystem":"Unnamed generative-AI image tool used to synthesise her likeness (per SM Entertainment's statement)","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Fabricated AI images of YoonA as pregnant, with false claims about her, circulated online; her agency filed a criminal complaint (SM Entertainment via Star News and Segye Ilbo).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One depicted person, YoonA (SM Entertainment via Star News). The unidentified man in the image is not counted. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"KR","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.starnewskorea.com/star/2026/09/28/2026092819154494314","primarySourceLabel":"Star News, 28 September 2026: 소녀시대 윤아, 악의적 임신 AI 합성 피해..SM \"이미 형사고소\"[전문]","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T03:22:06.71184+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:59.374935+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfakes","ai-generated-images","k-pop","girls-generation","sm-entertainment","south-korea","criminal-complaint","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-china-wang-ai-faceswap-defamation","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'2024年4月至2025年1月间，王某甲利用AI软件的深度合成技术，将于某（系化名）等多人的人脸信息与色情图片进行拼接，伪造大量不雅图片'; '多次在境外网站以公开发帖的形式予以散布。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Between April 2024 and January 2025 Wang used the deep-synthesis technology of AI software to splice the facial information of Yu (pseudonym) and several other people onto pornographic images, forged a large number of indecent images, fabricated 'sexual' topics about them and spread them repeatedly in public posts on overseas websites.","causal_attribution":"The court's account of the facts as published by the Jiangsu High People's Court and relayed by The Paper."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'2025年1月5日，王某甲又将两张AI换脸后面部为于某的裸照和于某有关证件图片发送给王某乙（另案处理），并捏造自己与于某存在性交易的不实信息。'; '后王某乙将上述图片转发至微信群，并在群里声称于某与他人存在性交易，引发群内外大量人员讨论，给于某的个人形象、工作、生活带来不利影响'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 5 January 2025 he sent two AI face-swapped nude images bearing Yu's face and images of Yu's identity documents to a second man with a fabricated claim that he had had a sex-for-money transaction with Yu; the second man forwarded them to Yu's work WeChat group and claimed there that Yu engaged in sex-for-money transactions with others, which the court found caused extensive discussion and adverse effects on Yu's image, work and life, seriously lowering Yu's social evaluation and violating Yu's dignity.","causal_attribution":"Court findings relayed by The Paper."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'张家港市人民法院于2025年12月1日作出一审判决，以诽谤罪判处被告人王某甲有期徒刑一年三个月。'; '宣判后，王某甲提出上诉。苏州市中级人民法院依法作出二审裁定，驳回上诉，维持原判。'; '1月27日，江苏省高级人民法院公布2025年度十大典型案例'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Zhangjiagang People's Court convicted him of defamation on 1 December 2025 and sentenced him to one year and three months' imprisonment, treating his voluntary surrender as mitigation; the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court rejected his appeal; on 27 January 2026 the Jiangsu High People's Court listed the case among its ten typical cases of 2025.","causal_attribution":"Court decisions as published by the High Court and relayed by The Paper; the written judgments were not inspected."}],"effects":[{"label":"the face of a person (pseudonym Yu) AI-swapped onto pornographic images posted on overseas sites and forwarded to Yu's work WeChat group with a fabricated claim of sex-for-money transactions; the court found harm to Yu's image, work, life and dignity","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"http://thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_32473843","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"zh","translation_note":"Read live in Chinese on 2026-09-23 (The Paper, 邱海鸿, 27 January 2026 19:07); relays the Jiangsu High People's Court's 2025 top-ten typical cases publication. The court judgment itself was not inspected. Model reading; no human bilingual review.","independence_group":"jiangsu-high-court"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","everyday_life","justice"],"unknowns":["The AI software used and the overseas websites.","How many other people's faces were used besides Yu.","The outcome of the separate case against the man who forwarded the images.","Whether Yu obtained civil compensation.","The judgment texts were not inspected; Chinese read by the model without human bilingual review.","Yu's sex and age are not stated in the cited body (于某, 其); earlier uncited reporting described a woman; victim_age_range adult is inferred from the work WeChat group.","Where the events took place and where Yu and the defendant live; the body names only the courts.","The conduct period is stated as ending in January 2025; 5 January 2025 is the last dated act and is used as the end date."],"geography":{"basis":"The Paper's account of the court's findings states no event location or residence for Yu or the defendant; the posts were made on overseas websites and the forwarding was to a WeChat work group. Under the charter a country is not inferred from the court, so event and affected-person countries are left empty as a reviewed unknown. Court: Zhangjiagang Municipal People's Court and Suzhou Intermediate People's Court, Jiangsu, China.","court_countries":["CN"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Restored under the 2026-09-15 charter as a harmful-artifact case with a criminal conviction: AI face-swapped pornographic images of a person forwarded to their workplace, with court findings of harm to their image, work, life and dignity, as published by the Jiangsu High People's Court and relayed by The Paper (one chain; all claims reported). The original ID and first-publication timestamp are preserved; the sentence and dates correct the historical row; the victim's sex, previously asserted, is not in the cited body and is recorded as unknown. The victim is identified only by a court pseudonym.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-23"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The court found that the defendant used the deep-synthesis technology of AI software to splice the victims' faces onto pornographic images (The Paper relaying the Jiangsu High People's Court). The software is not identified.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Jiangsu, China (Zhangjiagang court): a man used AI face-swap deep-synthesis to splice the faces of a person referred to as Yu and several others onto pornographic images, fabricated 'sexual' stories about them and posted the material repeatedly on overseas websites between April 2024 and January 2025; after two face-swapped nude images of Yu and Yu's ID were forwarded to Yu's work WeChat group with a fabricated claim of sex-for-money transactions, he was convicted of criminal defamation and sentenced to one year and three months (1 December 2025), upheld on appeal and listed by the Jiangsu High People's Court among its 2025 typical cases","summary":"According to the Jiangsu High People's Court's 2025 top-ten typical cases, published on 27 January 2026 and reported by The Paper, a man surnamed Wang used the deep-synthesis technology of AI software between April 2024 and January 2025 to splice the facial information of a person (pseudonym Yu) and several other people onto pornographic images, fabricated a large number of indecent images and 'sexual' topics about them, and repeatedly spread them in public posts on overseas websites. On 5 January 2025 he sent two AI face-swapped nude images bearing Yu's face and images of Yu's identity documents to a second man (dealt with separately) and fabricated the claim that he had had a sex-for-money transaction with Yu; although the second man said he would forward the material to Yu's work WeChat group, Wang did not clarify that it was false or effectively stop him, only deleting the contact. The second man forwarded the images to the WeChat group and claimed there that Yu sold sex, prompting extensive discussion inside and outside the group and, the court found, adverse effects on Yu's personal image, work and life, a serious lowering of Yu's social evaluation and a violation of Yu's dignity. The Zhangjiagang People's Court held that using deep-synthesis technology that ordinary people cannot easily identify to generate indecent images and fabricate sexual topics, spread repeatedly through information networks, was defamation of serious circumstances that seriously harmed social order; taking into account his voluntary surrender, it sentenced him on 1 December 2025 to one year and three months' imprisonment for defamation. The Suzhou Intermediate People's Court rejected his appeal. The High Court described the case as a typical example of punishing online defamation committed with AI.","incidentDate":"2024-04-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-01-05","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-01-27","aiSystem":"AI deep-synthesis ('face-swap') software; not identified in the court's account","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The face of a person (pseudonym Yu) was AI-swapped onto pornographic images that were posted repeatedly on overseas websites and then forwarded to Yu's workplace WeChat group with a fabricated claim that she sold sex; the court found adverse effects on Yu's image, work and life, a serious lowering of Yu's social evaluation and a violation of Yu's personal dignity. The court's findings are relayed by The Paper; the judgment itself was not inspected.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"One identified victim (Yu, pseudonym) whose images reached her work group; the court states that several other people's faces were also used (于某等多人) without a number. Partial: 1 counted plus unquantified others.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"CN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"http://thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_32473843","primarySourceLabel":"The Paper (澎湃新闻), 27 January 2026: 利用AI换脸生成不雅照片诽谤他人，男子被判一年三个月","firstPublishedAt":"2026-06-15T06:50:02.798485+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:31.844756+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["criminal","deepfake","face-swap","defamation","china","jiangsu","non-consensual-images","conviction","workplace","depicted-or-impersonated"]}]}