{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-09-30T06:33:30.257Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"tax","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"core","evidence":"","year":"2026","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":3,"coverage":{"cases":3,"countries":2,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":0,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":1,"minors":0,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-san-francisco-waymo-robotaxi-stopped-during-attack-with-rider-inside","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"It was nearing 3:30 a.m. on May 9","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"In a flash the man grabbed the Waymo’s front bumper, causing the autonomous vehicle to stop.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"the two took turns bashing the front windshield with an object that had the shape of a stick","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"the Waymo vehicle stopped at the intersection of Pierce and Lombard Street","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"two suspects threw items at the vehicle, jumped on it and broke a window","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"one of the men climbed on top of the vehicle’s hood and roof","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"He was riding shotgun","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Waymo pulled up to a stoplight","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"At about 3:30 a.m. on 9 May 2026 a Waymo robotaxi with a rider in the front passenger seat was at a stoplight at Pierce and Lombard streets in San Francisco when a man grabbed its front bumper and the vehicle stopped. The rider says two men then struck the windshield and windows and climbed onto the car.","causal_attribution":"The account is the rider's, told to the Chronicle and to NBC Bay Area, and the police report as described by both outlets records the rider's account. The attackers are the direct cause of the vandalism. No vehicle data or footage was inspected."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"He was trapped inside as the robotaxi remained stationary.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"10 minutes of terror","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"You can’t honk the horn,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"for approximately 10 minutes, he was unable to honk a horn or get customer service to move the vehicle","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"You can’t flash the lights. You can’t do anything to get out of there.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The rider says the robotaxi stayed stationary during an attack that the rider remembers as about 10 minutes, and that a Waymo rider cannot honk the horn or flash the lights to get help.","causal_attribution":"Single-source account (the rider). The Chronicle states the stationary vehicle in its own voice and a photo caption. No vehicle logs were inspected and Waymo has not described what the driving system did."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"He asked whether they could move the car, and they declined, saying it was obstructed.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Their response was no the car is obstructed and I said I'm literally looking in front of me on the street.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"There's nothing blocking me.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Spokespeople for Waymo were not immediately available to comment.","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Waymo did not provide further comment regarding","relation":"context","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"The car’s remote assistant had noticed the car was not moving and decided to call police.","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Waymo support staff who spoke to the rider through the car intercom declined the rider's request to move the car, saying it was obstructed. The rider says nothing was blocking the car. The Chronicle reports that the car's remote assistant had noticed the car was not moving and decided to call police.","causal_attribution":"Both outlets take this from the rider. The sources call the responders \"support team members\" and a \"remote assistant\" and do not say whether any reply was generated by software. Waymo has not responded to the specific account in the inspected sources."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"“Please, please, get me out of here,” he said. “They’re going to kill me.”","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"woke up to feel pain behind his ear. He thought a piece of glass had burst from the window and pierced his skin.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"He sought therapy to help process the attack","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"he noticed what he believed was a small laceration later that morning","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"he told them he was not injured","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"A Waymo customer support representative called and referred him to an insurance carrier for medical and mental health care.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The rider says the rider feared being killed, sought therapy afterward, and later noticed pain behind an ear that the rider believes came from glass. Police officials say the rider told officers at the scene that the rider was not injured. Waymo customer support later referred the rider to an insurance carrier for medical and mental health care.","causal_attribution":"The rider's own account. The Chronicle describes the injury as something the rider believed to be a small laceration, and the rider told officers of no injury. No medical or therapy record was inspected. The attackers struck the windshield and windows, and NBC Bay Area's description of the police report says a window was broken."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Two officers pulled up to the intersection at 3:46 a.m., found the damaged Waymo","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"as victims of malicious mischief.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"According to the report, the incident was classified as malicious mischief.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"It also notes damage to the windshield and states the vehicle was towed from the scene by Waymo staff.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"is merely a witness to the crime.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The San Francisco Police Department report, as described by the Chronicle and NBC Bay Area, identifies Waymo as the victim of malicious mischief and the rider as a witness. Officers reached the intersection at 3:46 a.m., found the damaged robotaxi and interviewed the rider.","causal_attribution":"Both outlets describe the report and neither publishes it. The report was not inspected. The rider recalls police arriving about 35 minutes after the rider called 911 (NBC Bay Area), which differs from the 3:46 a.m. time the Chronicle takes from the report."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"we’re unable to access any footage without proper legal justification.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"we can’t issue a search warrant on behalf of Waymo.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"has not received it.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"It remains unclear whether San Francisco police ever obtained the vehicle's surveillance footage.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"However, according to the narrative in the police report, an officer requested the footage the night of the incident.","relation":"context","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The rider asked Waymo and the police for the vehicle's video and had not received it as of mid-July 2026. Waymo told the rider it could not access footage without legal justification, and police said they could not seek a warrant on Waymo's behalf.","causal_attribution":"Company and police statements as quoted from emails to the rider. Whether footage exists in usable form was not established."}],"effects":[{"label":"Rider inside a stationary Waymo during an attack reports fear of being killed, later pain behind an ear and therapy","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/waymo-attack-rider-trapped-inside-22348656.php","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"sf-chronicle-report"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/waymo-customer-policy-changes-robotaxi-attack/4114814/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"nbc-bay-area-report"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://sfist.com/2026/07/17/waymo-under-fire-for-july-4th-traffic-debacle-and-for-leaving-passengers-helpless-in-vandalism-situations/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"sf-chronicle-report"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life"],"unknowns":["No Waymo vehicle log, footage or statement on the specific account was inspected. Waymo spokespeople were not available to the Chronicle and did not comment on the specific allegations to NBC Bay Area.","Whether the robotaxi stopped because of the bumper grab or because it was at a stoplight is not settled in the sources. The Chronicle writes that the grab caused it to stop, and also that it pulled up to a stoplight.","The Chronicle takes 3:46 a.m. as the time officers arrived from the police report, and the rider told NBC Bay Area that police arrived about 35 minutes after the 911 call. The two accounts are not reconciled.","NBC Bay Area reports that the San Francisco Police Department said it generally does not release video and is not the custodian of the recording, and that according to the narrative in the police report an officer requested the footage the night of the incident. The Chronicle quotes a police captain saying the department cannot issue a search warrant on behalf of Waymo. The two accounts are not reconciled.","Whether the rider was injured is unsettled: the rider told officers of no injury and later described pain behind an ear and a possible small cut. No medical record was inspected.","The two attackers are not identified and no arrest is reported in the inspected sources.","The police report was not inspected and is described only by the Chronicle and NBC Bay Area. The Chronicle body was read from a Wayback capture (26 September 2026) because the direct page returned a client-challenge stub. The capture is a revised version: an earlier syndicated copy (Yahoo, 17 July 2026) lacks the police officials' statement about the rider's injury and captions the photo 'refused to move', whereas the capture says 'remained stationary'. The record uses the revised text."],"geography":{"basis":"The Chronicle and NBC Bay Area place the event at Pierce and Lombard streets in San Francisco, and SFist describes the rider as a San Francisco resident. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"The San Francisco Chronicle article (full text read from a Wayback capture) and NBC Bay Area (independent interview and its own description of the police report) report the rider's account, and SFist rewrites the Chronicle. Every claim is the rider's statement, a description of a police report that was not inspected, or a company or police statement quoted by the outlets, so all claims stay at reported status. The direct harm is from the attackers, and the case is published for the reported behaviour of the stopped autonomous vehicle and of Waymo support toward the rider. The rider spoke to both outlets and is not named here.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The rider says the autonomous vehicle stopped when a man grabbed its bumper and stayed stationary for the rest of the attack, and that Waymo support staff declined to move it. The Chronicle states the vehicle stopped and remained stationary in its own voice, while the account of the attack and of the support replies comes from the rider. The vehicle was carrying the rider on a ride. No Waymo vehicle data or footage was inspected. The support responders are described as staff members and no source says software generated their replies.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["acted_on_behalf"]},"name":"San Francisco: rider says a Waymo robotaxi stayed stopped and support declined to move it while two men attacked the car with the rider inside (9 May 2026)","summary":"At about 3:30 a.m. on 9 May 2026 a Waymo robotaxi with a rider in the front passenger seat was at a stoplight at Pierce and Lombard streets in San Francisco when a man grabbed its front bumper and the vehicle stopped. The rider told the San Francisco Chronicle and NBC Bay Area that two men then struck the windshield and windows and climbed onto the car while it stayed stationary. The rider says Waymo support staff on the car intercom declined to move it, saying it was obstructed, although the rider saw nothing blocking it, and remembers about 10 minutes before the men left. The Chronicle reports that the car's remote assistant had noticed the car was not moving and decided to call police. The Chronicle reports that officers arrived at 3:46 a.m. The police report, as described by both outlets, identifies Waymo as the victim of malicious mischief and the rider as a witness. Police officials say the rider told officers of no injury. The rider later felt pain behind an ear that the rider believes came from glass, and sought therapy. Waymo spokespeople did not comment on the account in the reporting, and Waymo told the rider in an email that it was unable to access any footage without proper legal justification. The account is the rider's as reported by the Chronicle (16 July 2026) and NBC Bay Area (16 July 2026). The police report was not inspected and is known only through the outlets' descriptions.","incidentDate":"2026-05-09","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-07-16","aiSystem":"Waymo driverless robotaxi (autonomous vehicle), with remote support staff reachable through the car intercom","aiProduct":"Waymo Driver","aiCompany":"Waymo","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The rider told the Chronicle and NBC Bay Area that the rider feared being killed while the car was attacked and stayed stationary. The Chronicle reports that the rider later felt pain behind an ear that the rider thought came from glass and sought therapy. Police officials say the rider told officers at the scene that the rider was not injured. No medical or therapy record was inspected.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One rider reports fear, pain behind an ear and therapy. The sources do not say whether anyone else was in the vehicle, and no other person is reported harmed. The two men who attacked the vehicle are not counted as harmed.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/waymo-attack-rider-trapped-inside-22348656.php","primarySourceLabel":"San Francisco Chronicle (16 Jul 2026)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T21:16:47.405065+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:51.579837+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2026"]},{"id":"2026-rennes-administrative-court-fines-claimant-ai-written-tax-appeal","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Par une ordonnance n°2508168 rendue le 19 août 2026, le tribunal administratif de Rennes a infligé une amende pour recours abusif de 500 euros à une personne dont le recours avait manifestement été écrit à l’aide d’un outil d’intelligence artificielle.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'le vice-président du tribunal administratif de Rennes, Thurian Jouno, prend l'exemple d'une femme qui avait réclamé l'annulation d'un rattrapage fiscal, manifestement avec l'aide de l'IA. Elle a été condamnée à une amende de 500 €.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Le 19 août 2026, le tribunal administratif de Rennes a condamné une requérante à une amende de 500 euros pour recours abusif.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'Le tribunal administratif de Rennes a tranché le 19 août 2025 : 500 euros d’amende pour recours abusif.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"By order n°2508168 of 19 August 2026, the tribunal administratif de Rennes fined a claimant 500 euros for an abusive application (recours abusif) under article R.741-12 of the code de justice administrative.","causal_attribution":"Gossement Avocats quotes the order; the court’s vice-president described the fine on France Inter (ICI). Le Tribunal du Net (relaying Capital) dates the order 19 August 2025, contradicting its own opening sentence and the other sources; 2026 is used here."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'avait déposé un recours devant le tribunal administratif de Rennes pour contester une décision de l’administration fiscale (rappel de TVA)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'les moyens de la requête, laquelle a, au demeurant, été manifestement écrite à l’aide d’un outil d’intelligence artificielle, ne sont pas assortis des précisions les plus élémentaires, permettant au juge d’en apprécier la portée et le bien-fondé.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Elle demandait l’annulation d’un rattrapage fiscal dans une requête qui comportait des erreurs importantes et était, selon le juge, manifestement assistée par un outil d’intelligence artificielle.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The order states that the application, contesting a VAT reassessment by the tax administration, had manifestly been written with an artificial intelligence tool and that its grounds lacked the most elementary details needed for the judge to assess them; this was one of the grounds for rejecting it.","causal_attribution":"The court’s own finding, as quoted by Gossement Avocats. The court inferred AI drafting from the text; no source says which tool was used or quotes the claimant."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'il n’est pas établi que la requête ait été précédée d’une réclamation adressée aux services fiscaux. Elle est donc manifestement irrecevable'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Eu égard à ce qui a été dit aux points 2 et 3 ci-dessus, la présente requête, qui fait d’ailleurs suite à une requête ayant, en substance, le même objet, rejetée par ordonnance du 3 octobre 2025, présente un caractère abusif.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'le tribunal administratif de Rennes n’a pas infligé cette amende pour recours abusif à l’auteure de la requête au seul motif qu’il a été rédigé avec l’aide de l’IA.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Ce n’est donc pas l’usage de l’IA en lui-même qui a été puni, mais l’insistance sur un dossier déjà tranché.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The court also found the application manifestly inadmissible because it was not shown to have been preceded by a complaint to the tax service, and held it abusive in view of that finding, the imprecision finding and the fact that it followed a request with substantially the same object rejected by order of 3 October 2025.","causal_attribution":"The order’s reasoning as quoted by Gossement Avocats: the AI-drafted imprecision is one stated ground among several; Gossement and Le Tribunal du Net both stress that AI use alone was not the basis of the fine."}],"effects":[{"label":"a claimant was fined 500 euros for an abusive application that the court found manifestly written with an AI tool and lacking elementary detail","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the AI-drafted application was rejected, the court stating that its grounds could not be assessed","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.gossement-avocats.com/blog/ia-lusage-abusif-de-lintelligence-artificielle-peut-mener-a-une-amende-pour-recours-abusif-tribunal-administratif-de-rennes-19-aout-2026-n2508168/","kind":"legal_commentary","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Full post read by curl on 2026-09-29 (Arnaud Gossement, note updated 16 September 2026); it quotes the order at length. English renderings in the record are the reviewer’s translations. The order itself was not read.","independence_group":"rennes-order-2508168"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.ici.fr/bretagne/ille-et-vilaine-35/rennes/c-est-assez-angoissant-au-tribunal-de-rennes-l-inquietude-face-a-l-augmentation-des-requetes-creees-par-ia-4372820","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"ICI / France Inter, 2 September 2026, reporting the court vice-president’s radio interview; read in full by curl. Reviewer’s translations.","independence_group":"rennes-ta-vice-president"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.letribunaldunet.fr/hightech/recours-ia-amende-10000-euros-risque.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Le Tribunal du Net, 7 September 2026, relaying Capital.fr’s interview with lawyer Alexandre Lazarègue; read in full. It dates the order to 19 August 2025, an error against its own opening and the other sources. Capital.fr’s original was not read.","independence_group":"capital-lazaregue"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.epochtimes.fr/recours-administratifs-et-ia-la-justice-face-a-lafflux-de-requetes-redigees-avec-chatgpt-3354369.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"fr","translation_note":"Epoch Times France, 24 September 2026, summarising franceinfo’s report of the decision; read in full. franceinfo’s original was not read.","independence_group":"franceinfo-relay"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice","finance","public_services"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool was used and how the claimant used it.","The amount of the VAT reassessment at issue and whether the claimant pursued any further remedy.","Whether the earlier request rejected on 3 October 2025 was also AI-drafted."],"geography":{"basis":"The order was made by the tribunal administratif de Rennes (France) on a French tax (VAT) dispute. Where the claimant lives or where the application was drafted is not stated.","court_countries":["FR"],"event_countries":["FR"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete court sanction on a private person whose application the court found manifestly AI-written and too imprecise to assess. The record rests on a law firm’s verbatim quotation of the order and the court vice-president’s radio account; the order itself was not read. The court fined for several reasons, and the record states them. The claimant is not identified.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The order, as quoted by Gossement Avocats, states that the application was manifestly written with an artificial intelligence tool; the court’s vice-president repeated this on France Inter. This is the court’s inference from the text. The tool is not named and no source reproduces the claimant’s exchange with it.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Rennes administrative court fines a claimant 500 euros for an abusive tax appeal it found manifestly written with an AI tool and too imprecise to assess","summary":"According to Gossement Avocats, which quotes the order, and the court's vice-president on France Inter, an order of 19 August 2026 (n°2508168) of the tribunal administratif de Rennes rejected a claimant’s application contesting a VAT reassessment and fined the claimant 500 euros for an abusive application. As quoted by Gossement Avocats, the order says the application had manifestly been written with an artificial intelligence tool and that its grounds lacked the most elementary details needed to assess them. The court also found it inadmissible because no prior complaint to the tax service was shown, and noted that it repeated a request with substantially the same object rejected in October 2025. The court’s vice-president cited the case on France Inter; commentators stress that AI use alone was not the basis for the fine.","incidentDate":"2026-08-19","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-02","aiSystem":"Generative AI tool (not named in inspected sources)","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI tool","aiCompany":"Unknown","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A claimant was fined 500 euros for an abusive application and had it rejected; the order states the application was manifestly written with an AI tool and too imprecise to assess, alongside inadmissibility and repetition grounds (order quoted by Gossement Avocats; court vice-president on France Inter).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One harmed person: the claimant who filed the application the court found AI-written and who was fined 500 euros (order as quoted by Gossement Avocats; court vice-president on France Inter). No other harmed person is reported.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"FR","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.gossement-avocats.com/blog/ia-lusage-abusif-de-lintelligence-artificielle-peut-mener-a-une-amende-pour-recours-abusif-tribunal-administratif-de-rennes-19-aout-2026-n2508168/","primarySourceLabel":"Gossement Avocats: IA : l’usage abusif de l’intelligence artificielle peut mener à une amende pour recours abusif (TA Rennes, ord., 19 août 2026, n°2508168)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T09:10:28.483038+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:50.764055+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["justice","administrative-court","fine","recours-abusif","ai-drafted-filing","tax","own-use","france","rennes"]},{"id":"2026-texas-goodwin-ai-deepfake-campaign-ads-sheriff-complaint","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'has filed a police report accusing Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick of violating Texas law after his campaign released two ads featuring AI-generated videos of Goodwin.'; 'submitted with a complaint filed Saturday with the Travis County Sheriff’s Office.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'filed a police report saying that artificial intelligence-generated ads released by Patrick's campaign in September violated state law.'; 'The Travis County Sheriff’s Office confirmed receipt of Goodwin's complaint but did not offer additional comment.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'according to a notarized affidavit she filed Saturday with the Travis County Sheriff’s Office.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"On Saturday 19 September 2026 Vikki Goodwin filed a complaint with a sworn affidavit at the Travis County Sheriff's Office accusing Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick of violating the 2019 Texas election deepfake law after his campaign posted two ads with AI-generated videos of her; the sheriff's office confirmed receipt of the complaint.","causal_attribution":"The filing is reported from the affidavit (Tribune, KXAN) and confirmed by the sheriff's office (KUT)."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I did not personally do or say the things depicted in the video; although the ‘person’ in the video appears to be me, it was not actually me'; 'Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick posted the video with the intent to deceive Texans, injure a candidate, or influence the result of an election'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The affidavit alleges two instances of AI-generated deepfakes targeting Goodwin, the first on Sept. 5 (27 workdays prior to Oct. 19) and the second on Sept. 12 (23 workdays).'; 'Both of the videos were posted by Patrick’s non-government account on the social media website X'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'The AI ads were making it look as though I'm in favor of increasing taxes, and of course, nobody wants their taxes to be increased, so that's going to turn voters off'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In the affidavit Goodwin stated that she did not do or say the things depicted, that the person in the video appeared to be her but was not, and that Patrick posted the video with intent to deceive Texans, injure a candidate or influence the election; the affidavit identifies two posts, on 5 and 12 September 2026, on Patrick's non-government X account; Goodwin told KUT the ads made it look as though she favoured raising taxes.","causal_attribution":"The candidate's sworn allegations and interview statements; not independently established beyond the existence and contents of the affidavit."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Allen Blakemore, a campaign spokesman for Patrick, told the New York Times that the material was “an obvious parody produced to entertain.”'; 'Furthermore, we have not published or distributed any of these parodies within 30 days of the election.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Patrick campaign spokesman Allen Blakemore told The New York Times on Saturday that the videos were “an obvious parody produced to entertain.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'KUT News also reached out to Patrick’s campaign, but has not yet received a response.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Patrick's campaign spokesman told the New York Times the material was 'an obvious parody produced to entertain' and that none of it was published or distributed within 30 days of the election; KUT received no response from the campaign.","causal_attribution":"The campaign's response as relayed from the New York Times, which this review could not read."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Goodwin cited a 2019 Texas law banning the deepfake videos from being published or distributed within 30 days of an election.'; 'defines a deepfake video as appearing to depict a real person performing an action that did not occur, with the intent to deceive.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'A conviction under the deepfake law is a class A misdemeanor, which can carry a fine of up to $4,000 and/or up to one year imprisonment.'; 'while Election Day is Nov. 3, early voting begins Oct. 19.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The 2019 Texas law bans deepfake videos, defined as appearing to depict a real person performing an action that did not occur with intent to deceive, within 30 days of an election; early voting begins on 19 October 2026; a conviction is a class A misdemeanour with up to a $4,000 fine and a year in jail.","causal_attribution":"Legal background as described by the outlets; whether the posts fall within the statutory window is disputed between the campaigns."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The posts were still public when Goodwin filed her police report and affidavit on Sept. 19 but were taken down the following day, according to Sophia Mirto, Goodwin’s communications director.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'However, links to the posts lead to messages saying that the posts don’t exist.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'Goodwin linked to two specific posts on X; however, those posts now appear to have been deleted.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The two posts are no longer available on X; according to Goodwin's communications director they were taken down on 20 September 2026, the day after the complaint.","causal_attribution":"The deletion date is the Goodwin campaign's account; KXAN and KUT observed only that the posts no longer resolve."}],"effects":[{"label":"the candidate was depicted in AI-generated campaign videos saying things she did not say, which she says misrepresented her tax position to voters","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"she filed a sworn criminal complaint; the posts were removed the following day, her campaign says","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.texastribune.org/2026/09/21/texas-goodwin-patrick-ad-police-complaint/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live in English on 2026-09-22 (The Texas Tribune, 21 September 2026 17:48 Central). Affidavit shared with the Tribune; Patrick campaign statement relayed from the New York Times; communications director on the deletion.","independence_group":"texas-tribune"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.kut.org/politics/2026-09-21/vikki-goodwin-dan-patrick-ai-deepfake-campaign-ads-texas-lieutenant-governor-race","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live in English on 2026-09-22 (KUT Austin, 21 September 2026 13:03 CDT). Own interview with Goodwin on Monday; the Travis County Sheriff's Office confirmed receipt of the complaint to KUT.","independence_group":"kut"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/politics/election-2026/2026/09/21/562352/vikki-goodwin-files-police-report-saying-dan-patrick-broke-law-with-ai-generated-campaign-ads/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live in English on 2026-09-22 (Houston Public Media, 21 September 2026). Same KUT report; grouped with s2.","independence_group":"kut"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.kxan.com/news/texas-politics/lt-gov-candidate-goodwin-reports-dan-patrick-social-media-deepfakes-to-travis-county-sheriff/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live in English on 2026-09-22 (KXAN Austin, AMP page, 21 September 2026; JSON-LD retained). Affidavit dates of the two posts, misdemeanour penalty, Patrick campaign statement relayed from the New York Times.","independence_group":"kxan"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/19/us/vikki-goodwin-dan-patrick-ai-attack-ads-texas.html","kind":"news_report","access":"unavailable","language":null,"translation_note":"New York Times, 19 September 2026: answered HTTP 403 on 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-22; its content is known only through the Tribune and KXAN. Not relied on.","independence_group":"nyt"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["elections","justice","public_life"],"unknowns":["What the two videos showed and said; they were deleted, and the inspected reports describe them only as an AI-generated Goodwin describing her policies (KUT relaying the New York Times) with a tax theme (Goodwin to KUT).","Which tool produced the videos and who made them for the campaign.","Whether the Travis County Sheriff's Office opened an investigation; Goodwin herself doubted it would.","Whether the 5 and 12 September posts fall within the statutory 30-day window, which the two campaigns dispute.","The New York Times report that first carried the campaign's response could not be read."],"geography":{"basis":"Posts on the X account of the Texas lieutenant governor concerning a Texas election; complaint filed with the Travis County Sheriff's Office in Austin, Texas (Tribune, KUT, KXAN). No court proceeding exists.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an impersonation case involving a public figure: a candidate depicted by AI-generated video in an opponent's ads, with a sworn complaint filed and the posts removed. Four bodies read across three reporting chains (the affidavit via the Tribune and KXAN, the sheriff's confirmation via KUT, the opposing campaign via the Times). The depiction is undisputed; deception and illegality are disputed and recorded as such. Both principals are public officials.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-22"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The Texas Tribune, KUT and KXAN describe the two ads as AI-generated videos of Goodwin; her affidavit says the person in the video appears to be her but is not; the Patrick campaign does not deny the videos were generated and describes them as parody. The tool is not identified and the videos are no longer online.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Texas: State Rep. Vikki Goodwin, the Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor, filed a sworn complaint with the Travis County Sheriff's Office on 19 September 2026 alleging that two campaign ads posted on Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick's X account used AI-generated video of her saying things she never said; the posts were deleted the next day, her campaign says, and Patrick's campaign calls them obvious parody","summary":"On Saturday 19 September 2026 Vikki Goodwin, an Austin state representative running against Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, filed a complaint with a notarised affidavit at the Travis County Sheriff's Office accusing Patrick of violating Texas's 2019 election deepfake law, after his campaign posted two ads (5 and 12 September, on his non-government X account) containing AI-generated videos of her. In the affidavit she stated: 'I did not personally do or say the things depicted in the video; although the \"person\" in the video appears to be me, it was not actually me', and that the video was posted 'with the intent to deceive Texans, injure a candidate, or influence the result of an election'. She told KUT the ads made it look as though she favoured raising taxes, which she says she opposes in every campaign speech. The sheriff's office confirmed receipt of the complaint without further comment. Patrick's campaign spokesman told the New York Times the material was 'an obvious parody produced to entertain' and that none of it was published within 30 days of the election; the posts were taken down the day after the complaint, according to Goodwin's communications director. Goodwin said she doubted the sheriff's office would follow up now that the posts were removed. A conviction under the law is a class A misdemeanour.","incidentDate":"2026-09-05","incidentEndDate":"2026-09-20","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-19","aiSystem":"AI-generated video (deepfake) of the candidate in two campaign ads; tool not identified","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A candidate was depicted in AI-generated campaign videos saying things she did not say, which she says misrepresented her position on taxes to voters; she filed a sworn criminal complaint and the posts were removed the next day. The depiction is undisputed (the Patrick campaign calls the videos parody); whether it was deceptive or unlawful is disputed and unresolved.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One depicted person, the candidate who filed the complaint. Exact 1. Voters said to have been misled are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-TX","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.texastribune.org/2026/09/21/texas-goodwin-patrick-ad-police-complaint/","primarySourceLabel":"The Texas Tribune, 21 September 2026: In lieutenant governor race, Vikki Goodwin says Dan Patrick ads are illegal AI deepfakes","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-22T03:45:53.964979+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:56.666615+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","ai-generated-video","election","political-advertising","texas","travis-county","public-figure","depicted"]}]}