{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-21T06:55:45.320Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"regulator","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"core","evidence":"","year":"","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":11,"coverage":{"cases":11,"countries":8,"languages":6,"unknownLocation":3,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":3,"lawsuits":1,"regulatory":7,"minors":3,"coreRelations":11,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-central-poland-pupils-ai-nude-image-of-classmate-prosecutors-reopen-case","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Był czerwiec. Grupka uczniów z tej podstawówki najpierw pobrała z sieci zdjęcie koleżanki, a potem, przez jedną z wielu aplikacji oferujących „rozebranie” osoby z wgranego zdjęcia, wygenerowała nagie zdjęcie kobiety z twarzą koleżanki. Uczniowie opublikowali je w internecie, na instagramowym profilu szkoły. I zachęcali innych do zamawiania „zdjęcia” dziewczyny.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Uczniowie podstawówki przy pomocy AI \"rozebrali\" swoją koleżankę i udostępnili wygenerowany wizerunek w mediach społecznościowych, zachęcając innych użytkowników do tworzenia własnych przeróbek.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In June 2025 a group of pupils at a primary school in central Poland downloaded a classmate's photo from the internet, used one of the applications that offer to \"undress\" a person in an uploaded photo to generate a nude image bearing her face, posted it on the school's Instagram profile and encouraged others to order further \"photos\" of her.","causal_attribution":"OKO.press narrative and the data protection authority's account as reported by Prawo.pl; the application is not named."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Prezes UODO podkreślił, że osoba, której wizerunek został zmodyfikowany przy użyciu aplikacji wykorzystującej sztuczną inteligencję, jest osobą małoletnią poniżej 15. roku życia i istnieje wysokie prawdopodobieństwo możliwości jej identyfikacji.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Prezes UODO sprawę zgłosił policji i prokuraturze, wskazując, że doszło do kradzieży tożsamości (art. 190 a § 2 kodeksu karnego), produkcji, możliwości utrwalania i rozpowszechniania treści pornograficznych z udziałem osoby małoletniej (art. 202 § 3 k.k.) oraz nielegalnego przetworzenia danych osobowych (107 ust. 1 ustawy o ochronie danych osobowych).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The president of the Personal Data Protection Office (UODO) notified the police, stating that the girl whose image was modified with an AI-based application was under 15 and could very probably be identified.","causal_attribution":"The data protection authority's statement as reported by Prawo.pl, and its notification as summarised by OKO.press (one origin: the authority)."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"„Dużo o tym w szkole rozmawialiśmy. Dzieci miały warsztaty z psychologiem, pedagogiem, policją. Działania profilaktyczne trwały cały miesiąc” ... „To była patowa sytuacja. Cała historia wydarzyła się poza szkołą, na urządzeniach, które dzieciom kupili rodzice.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The head teacher told OKO.press that the events took place outside school on devices the children's parents had bought them, and that the school ran a month of preventive workshops with a psychologist, a pedagogue and the police.","causal_attribution":"Head teacher interviewed by OKO.press."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Policja jednak odmówiła wszczęcia śledztwa. Prokuratura jeszcze tego samego miesiąca, w czerwcu, decyzję policji zatwierdziła. Powód? Organy zgodnie uznały, że „czyn nastolatków nie zawiera znamion czynu zabronionego”.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Policja i prokuratura uznały, że AI-wygenerowany materiał nie stanowi treści pornograficznej, a przerobienie dostępnego publicznie zdjęcia nie jest „przetwarzaniem danych osobowych”. Ich zdaniem uczennica nie poniosła szkody","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The police refused to open proceedings and the prosecutor's office upheld that decision, finding that the pupils' act had no features of a prohibited act; according to Gazeta Prawna they considered that the AI-generated material was not pornographic content and that the pupil suffered no harm.","causal_attribution":"OKO.press and the authority's account relayed by Gazeta Prawna; the police did not answer OKO.press."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych interweniuje u Prokuratora Generalnego po tym, jak policja odmówiła wszczęcia postępowania w sprawie wygenerowania przez uczniów nagiego zdjęcia ich koleżanki za pomocą aplikacji opartej na sztucznej inteligencji. ... UODO domaga się wznowienia postępowania, wskazując na konieczność ochrony małoletnich przed rosnącym zjawiskiem deepfake’ów.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"Prezes UODO skierował wówczas apel do ministra sprawiedliwości i Prokuratora Generalnego Waldemara Żurka o podjęcie działań w sprawie.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The UODO president then asked the Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General, Waldemar Żurek, to have the case taken up again.","causal_attribution":"The authority's own intervention, relayed by two outlets (one origin)."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Jak wynika z czwartkowego komunikatu Urzędu, prokuratura poinformowała prezesa Wróblewskiego o podjęciu sprawy uczennicy na nowo.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"In January 2026 the UODO announced that the prosecutor's office had informed its president that it was taking up the pupil's case again.","causal_attribution":"The authority's communique as relayed by CyberDefence24; the prosecutors' own decision was not read."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Podobnie było w sprawie wygenerowanego rozbieranego zdjęcia uczennicy podstawówki (przez jej szkolnych kolegów), w której Prezes UODO po raz kolejny wnioskował niedawno o wznowienie śledztwa.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"In a statement of 24 June 2026 on a separate case, the UODO said that in this primary-school case its president had recently asked once again for the investigation to be resumed.","causal_attribution":"The authority's own statement; it does not say whether the proceedings reopened in January 2026 had been closed again."}],"effects":[{"label":"AI-generated nude image of a girl under 15 posted online by classmates","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"police and prosecutors initially declined to open proceedings","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://oko.press/fejkowe-nagie-zdjecia-uczennicy-policja-to-ai-sprawy-nie-ma","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"pl","translation_note":"Read in Polish on 2026-10-19 (HTTP 200); quoted passages are kept in Polish and the English sense was rendered by the research agent (an AI), not a human translator. OKO.press report of 10 December 2025, with an interview of the school head teacher; the outlet withholds the town and the head teacher's name.","independence_group":"oko-press-reporting-10-dec-2025"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.prawo.pl/oswiata/kara-za-deepfake-zdjecia-dziecka,533313.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"pl","translation_note":"Read in Polish on 2026-10-19 (HTTP 200); quoted passages are kept in Polish and the English sense was rendered by the research agent (an AI), not a human translator. Prawo.pl report of 11 June 2025 on the data protection authority's notification to the police.","independence_group":"uodo-statements-on-the-case"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.gazetaprawna.pl/nowe-technologie/artykuly/10954096,ai-wygenerowala-nagie-zdjecie-uczennicy-organy-scigania-odmowily-sled.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"pl","translation_note":"Read in Polish on 2026-10-19 (HTTP 200); quoted passages are kept in Polish and the English sense was rendered by the research agent (an AI), not a human translator. Gazeta Prawna report of 7 December 2025 on the authority's intervention with the Prosecutor General.","independence_group":"uodo-statements-on-the-case"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://cyberdefence24.pl/cyberbezpieczenstwo/zwrot-w-sprawie-deepnude-z-uczennica-jest-decyzja-prokuratury","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"pl","translation_note":"Read in Polish on 2026-10-19 (HTTP 200); quoted passages are kept in Polish and the English sense was rendered by the research agent (an AI), not a human translator. CyberDefence24 report of 15 January 2026 relaying the authority's communique on the prosecutors' decision.","independence_group":"uodo-statements-on-the-case"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://uodo.gov.pl/pl/138/4445","kind":"official_statement","access":"read","language":"pl","translation_note":"Read in Polish on 2026-10-19 (HTTP 200); quoted passages are kept in Polish and the English sense was rendered by the research agent (an AI), not a human translator. UODO news item of 24 June 2026 on a separate Krakow case, which refers back to this case.","independence_group":"uodo-statements-on-the-case"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["education","privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["Which application was used and how the AI generation was established.","Exactly when the police refusal was issued: OKO.press says the prosecutor upheld it in June 2025, while CyberDefence24 says the services refused in the autumn.","Whether the proceedings reopened in January 2026 were closed again before June 2026, when the UODO said its president had again asked for the investigation to be resumed.","What the reopened proceedings have found and whether any measures were imposed on the pupils.","How long the image stayed online and how many people saw it."],"geography":{"basis":"OKO.press places the primary school in central Poland (\"To centrum Polski\") and the Polish police and prosecutors handled the case. No court proceeding is reported, so court_countries is empty.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["PL"],"affected_person_countries":["PL"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): OKO.press and the Polish data protection authority both describe classmates using an AI \"undressing\" application to generate and post a nude image of a girl under 15, and the authority's complaint led prosecutors to reopen the case after police declined to act; in June 2026 the authority said it had again asked for the investigation to be resumed. The girl, the school and the town are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-19"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"OKO.press reports that the pupils used one of the applications that offer to \"undress\" a person in an uploaded photo to generate a nude image with their classmate's face, and the Personal Data Protection Office (as reported by Prawo.pl and Gazeta Prawna) describes the girl's image as modified with an application using artificial intelligence. Gazeta Prawna reports that the police and prosecutors themselves treated the material as AI-generated when they declined to act. The generated image depicts the girl (depicted_or_impersonated) and its publication is the reported harm. The application is not named and no source describes how the AI generation was established.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Central Poland: pupils reportedly used an AI app to make a nude image of a classmate under 15; prosecutors reopened the case after the data regulator intervened","summary":"In June 2025, according to OKO.press, a group of pupils at a primary school in central Poland took a classmate's photo from the internet, used an application that offers to \"undress\" people in uploaded photos to generate a nude image bearing her face, posted it on the school's Instagram profile and urged others to order more such images. Poland's Personal Data Protection Office (UODO) says the girl was under 15 and notified the police, but the police declined to open proceedings and the prosecutor's office upheld that decision, finding no prohibited act; Gazeta Prawna reports that they considered the AI-generated material not pornographic and the pupil unharmed. The UODO president appealed to the Prosecutor General, in January 2026 the authority announced that prosecutors had informed it they were taking up the case again, and in June 2026 it said its president had recently asked once more for the investigation to be resumed. The application is not named.","incidentDate":"2025-06-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-06-11","aiSystem":"An application offering to \"undress\" a person in an uploaded photo, described by the data protection authority as using artificial intelligence (not named)","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to OKO.press and the Polish data protection authority, classmates generated a nude image of a girl under 15 with an AI \"undressing\" app and posted it online; police and prosecutors initially declined to act.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"outward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One girl, the classmate whose photo was turned into the nude image (OKO.press; UODO via Prawo.pl). The audience of the Instagram post is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"PL","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://oko.press/fejkowe-nagie-zdjecia-uczennicy-policja-to-ai-sprawy-nie-ma","primarySourceLabel":"OKO.press, 10 December 2025: Jej fejkowe „nagie” zdjęcia mógł obejrzeć każdy w klasie. Policja: To AI, sprawy nie ma","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-19T03:13:13.685997+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-19T03:23:25.300558+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-nude-image","sexual-images-of-minors","school","poland","data-protection-authority","case-reopened","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2024-italy-tv-satire-show-ai-deepfakes-of-journalist-mentana-privacy-regulator-warns-broadcaster","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'per alcuni servizi di Striscia la Notizia, nei quali l’immagine e la voce di Enrico Mentana erano state manipolate mediante l’impiego di sistemi di intelligenza artificiale.'; 'Nei filmati venivano attribuite al noto giornalista dichiarazioni mai pronunciate, mentre la sua immagine era collocata virtualmente nello studio televisivo dell’emittente per la quale lavora.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'servizi costruiti prendendo come spunto fatti che hanno coinvolto diversi personaggi pubblici e accompagnandoli con commenti di vario genere pronunciati dal deepfake del reclamante doppiato con sistemi di intelligenza artificiale'; 'è stata utilizzata l’immagine reale del reclamante, ripresa peraltro all’interno dello studio televisivo da cui il medesimo dirige un telegiornale di fascia serale, alterandone la genuinità attraverso un doppiaggio effettuato con strumenti tali da non rendere chiaramente percepibile l’esistenza della predetta alterazione'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Striscia la Notizia aired segments in which the image and voice of journalist Enrico Mentana were manipulated with AI systems, attributing to him statements he never made while placing his image in the studio of the channel he works for.","causal_attribution":"The regulator's findings in its decision and press release; R.T.I. itself describes computer-generated dubbing."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'nella puntata di venerdì 8 novembre manderà in onda un servizio che vedrà protagonista Enrico Mentana, ma in versione deepfake, ovvero con voce e immagini generati dall’intelligenza artificiale.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"A preview published on 8 November 2024 describes a Striscia la Notizia segment airing that evening in which a deepfake Mentana, with voice and images generated by AI, commented on a game show.","causal_attribution":"A press preview of the programme; it establishes that such segments aired from at least November 2024, not which segments the complaint listed (the decision redacts their dates)."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'moltissime persone hanno creduto che i video, prodotti da Striscia la Notizia e divulgati sul mezzo televisivo e sui social, fossero reali'; 'rivelano come molte persone siano convinte che le dichiarazioni siano autentiche, determinando con ciò una gravissima lesione dell’onore, della reputazione e della propria professionalità'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Mentana complained to the Garante that many people believed the videos were real and that users' insulting comments showed serious harm to his honour, reputation and professionalism.","causal_attribution":"The complainant's submissions as recorded in the decision."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'il realismo delle immagini, la scarsa percepibilità dell’alterazione e la plausibilità delle dichiarazioni avrebbero potuto indurre il pubblico a ritenere autentici i contenuti. Anche le avvertenze sulla natura artificiale dei video non sono state ritenute sufficientemente chiare'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'amplificando altresì il rischio di farne veicolo di disinformazione per il pubblico, come confermato dai numerosi messaggi di scherno e/o di offesa ricevuti via social dal reclamante'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Garante found that the content could lead the public to consider it authentic, that the warnings were not sufficiently clear, and that the real studio setting amplified the risk of disinformation, as confirmed by the numerous mocking or offensive messages Mentana received on social media.","causal_attribution":"The regulator's findings; the regulator's reference to the messages rests on material in the complaint."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Il Garante ha quindi accertato la violazione dell’articolo 5 del GDPR'; 'ha adottato nei confronti di R.T.I. Spa un provvedimento di ammonimento e ha vietato l’ulteriore utilizzo dei dati di Enrico Mentana con le modalità contestate'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'dispone il divieto di ulteriore trattamento dei dati del reclamante con le modalità sopra descritte, eccettuata la mera conservazione degli stessi ai fini di un loro eventuale utilizzo in sede giudiziaria'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Garante found breaches of GDPR Articles 5 and 25, warned R.T.I. and prohibited further processing of Mentana's data in the contested way, except retention for judicial use.","causal_attribution":"The dispositive part of the decision."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'l’unica attività realizzata da R.T.I. è stata quella di disporre, con riguardo ai predetti filmati, il doppiaggio del dott. Mentana, con voce diversa dalla sua, attraverso appositi sistemi informativi'; 'la finalità dei servizi oggetto di reclamo è quella di esercitare il diritto di satira ricorrendo all’imitazione del reclamante'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"R.T.I. argued that its only intervention was dubbing licensed footage with a different, computer-generated voice, that the segments were satire, and that disclaimers made clear it was not the real Mentana speaking.","causal_attribution":"The broadcaster's submissions as recorded in the decision; the Garante did not accept them."}],"effects":[{"label":"AI deepfake segments attributing invented statements to a journalist","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"mocking or offensive messages and risk to reputation found by the regulator","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/10281135","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Garante press release of 7 August 2026; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"garante-privacy"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/10281021","kind":"official_record","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Garante decision of 23 July 2026 (doc. web 10281021), read in full; dates and names of counsel are redacted as XX; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"garante-privacy"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://dilei.it/spettacolo/striscia-la-notizia-enrico-mentana-svela-il-vero-volto-stefano-de-martino/1587080/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"it","translation_note":"Read in Italian by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-17 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. DiLei entertainment preview, 8 November 2024; HTTP 200.","independence_group":"dilei-8-nov-2024"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["Which segments the complaint covered and when they aired; the decision redacts the dates.","Which AI tools were used.","Whether R.T.I. challenged the decision in court and what measures it reported to the Garante."],"geography":{"basis":"The segments were aired by R.T.I. (Reti Televisive Italiane) on Striscia la Notizia and investigated by Italy's data protection authority; the depicted person is the director of La7's news bulletin. His country of residence is not stated. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["IT"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): Italy's data protection authority found that a broadcaster's AI deepfakes of a journalist could be taken as authentic, noted the offensive messages he received, warned the broadcaster and barred further use. The journalist is a public figure who brought the complaint and is named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-17"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Italy's data protection authority, after an investigation of the complaint, states that the journalist's image and voice were manipulated with AI systems in the segments and that statements he never made were attributed to him; the broadcaster told the authority it dubbed the footage with a computer-generated voice. The authority found the content could be taken as authentic and cited the mocking or offensive messages he received, which is the reported harm.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Italy's privacy regulator warns broadcaster R.T.I. and bars further use of AI deepfakes of journalist Enrico Mentana in Striscia la Notizia segments","summary":"The satirical television programme Striscia la Notizia, published by R.T.I., aired segments in which the image and voice of the journalist Enrico Mentana, director of La7's news bulletin, were, according to the Garante, manipulated with AI systems so that he appeared in his own studio making statements he never made (its decision describes real footage from his studio altered by AI dubbing); a November 2024 preview describes one such segment. After Mentana complained, Italy's data protection authority (Garante) found on 23 July 2026 that the realism of the images, the low perceptibility of the alteration and the plausibility of the statements could lead the public to think the content authentic, and that the disclaimers were not clear enough. It found breaches of GDPR Articles 5 and 25, issued a warning to R.T.I. and prohibited further processing of his data in that way. The Garante noted the numerous mocking or offensive messages he received on social media. R.T.I. argued that the segments were satire, that it only dubbed licensed footage with a computer-generated voice, and that its disclaimers made the deepfake evident. No fine was imposed.","incidentDate":"2024-11-08","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-08-07","aiSystem":"AI systems used by the programme to manipulate the journalist's image and voice (the Garante); R.T.I. describes computer-generated dubbing of licensed footage. No product is named.","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Italy's data protection authority found that AI deepfakes of a journalist on a satirical TV programme could be taken as authentic and noted the numerous mocking or offensive messages he received; it warned the broadcaster and barred further use.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the journalist depicted in the deepfakes, whose complaint the Garante upheld (decision 10281021). Viewers are an audience and are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"IT","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/10281135","primarySourceLabel":"Garante per la protezione dei dati personali, press release, 7 August 2026: stop to satirical deepfakes of Enrico Mentana","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-17T03:08:22.075012+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-17T03:08:22.075012+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","voice_synthesis","television","satire","data_protection_authority","gdpr"]},{"id":"2025-johannesburg-high-court-refers-applicant-lawyers-to-legal-practice-council-over-ai-tool-fictitious-citations","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'two cases cited in Northbound Processing'; 'were fictitious'; 'the revised version contained two additional incorrect citations'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'heads of argument contained fictitious case citations that appeared to have been generated by artificial intelligence'; 'contained two additional incorrect citations'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"While preparing judgment in Northbound Processing's urgent application against the South African Diamond and Precious Metals Regulator, the acting judge found that two cases cited in the applicant's heads of argument did not exist, and a corrected version supplied by junior counsel contained two further incorrect citations.","causal_attribution":"The judgment as described by ITWeb and by a law-firm alert; both rest on the same judgment, which was not read."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'acknowledged that the non-existent citations likely originated from an AI tool'; 'he had used a tool called'; 'which claimed to be trained solely on South African legal sources'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'counsel acknowledged the use of AI, accepted full responsibility'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On the court's direct inquiry, junior counsel acknowledged that the non-existent citations likely originated from an AI tool and said a tool called Legal Genius had been used under deadline pressure.","causal_attribution":"Counsel's statement to the court as relayed by ITWeb; the law-firm alert relays the acknowledgment without naming the tool."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'found no intent to deceive the court'; 'be referred to the Legal Practice Council for investigation'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'a referral to the Legal Practice Council for investigation'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The judge accepted the legal team's apologies and found no intent to deceive the court, but ordered that the conduct of Northbound's legal practitioners be referred to the Legal Practice Council for investigation.","causal_attribution":"The court's order as described by both accounts of the judgment."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'While Northbound ultimately succeeded in obtaining the relief sought'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Northbound nevertheless obtained the relief it sought in the application.","causal_attribution":"The law-firm alert's account of the judgment."}],"effects":[{"label":"the applicant's legal practitioners were referred to the Legal Practice Council for investigation over fictitious citations","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.itweb.co.za/article/lawyers-face-probe-for-using-hallucinating-genai-in-court/Pero3MZ3221qQb6m","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-14 (HTTP 200). ITWeb reports from court documents it saw; the judgment itself was not available to the agent.","independence_group":"northbound-processing-judgment-zagpjhc"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com/en/news/publications/2025/Practice/Employment-Law/combined-employment-and-knowledge-management-alert-4-july-Another-episode-of-fabricated-citations-real-repercussions-South-African-courts-show-no-tolerance-for-AI-hallucinated-cases","kind":"other","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-14 from a 2025 Internet Archive capture (the live page returned HTTP 403). A law-firm client alert analysing the same judgment; same origin as ITWeb.","independence_group":"northbound-processing-judgment-zagpjhc"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice","work"],"unknowns":["The exact date of the judgment and of the referral order.","How many practitioners were referred and the outcome of any Legal Practice Council investigation.","Which citations Legal Genius produced and whether the tool provider responded."],"geography":{"basis":"The heads were filed in, and the referral ordered by, the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Johannesburg (ITWeb, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr). Where counsel prepared the heads is not stated, so no event or affected-person country is recorded from the court seat.","court_countries":["ZA"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published because two accounts of the judgment report that the court referred the applicant's lawyers to the Legal Practice Council after heads of argument cited non-existent cases, and that junior counsel told the court the citations likely came from the AI tool Legal Genius.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-14"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"ITWeb, which saw the court documents, reports that on the court's direct inquiry junior counsel acknowledged that the non-existent citations in the heads of argument likely originated from an AI tool and said a tool called Legal Genius had been used under deadline pressure; Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr's analysis of the judgment says counsel acknowledged the use of AI. The tool's output (citations of cases that do not exist) was filed in the heads, and the court referred the practitioners to the Legal Practice Council because fictitious authorities were placed before it. The attribution rests on counsel's acknowledgment as relayed by these two accounts of the judgment; the judgment itself was not read.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Johannesburg High Court refers a company's lawyers to the Legal Practice Council over fictitious citations that junior counsel said likely came from an AI tool","summary":"In an urgent application by Northbound Processing against the South African Diamond and Precious Metals Regulator, Acting Judge DJ Smit of the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, found while preparing judgment that two cases cited in the applicant's heads of argument did not exist. According to ITWeb, which saw the court documents, junior counsel first said a wrong version had been filed, a corrected version was found to contain two further incorrect citations, and on the court's direct inquiry junior counsel acknowledged that the citations likely originated from an AI tool called Legal Genius, used under deadline pressure. The judge accepted the legal team's apologies and found no intent to deceive, but referred the conduct of the applicant's legal practitioners to the Legal Practice Council for investigation (June 2025). The applicant obtained the relief it sought.","incidentDate":"2025-06-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-07-02","aiSystem":"Legal Genius, an AI legal research tool that junior counsel told the court had been used and which, junior counsel said, claimed to be trained solely on South African legal sources","aiProduct":"Legal Genius (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to ITWeb and a law-firm alert on the judgment, the court referred the applicant's legal practitioners to the Legal Practice Council for investigation after heads of argument cited non-existent cases that junior counsel said likely came from the AI tool Legal Genius.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"One person counted: the junior counsel who told the court the tool had been used, among the legal practitioners whose conduct was referred. The order refers the practitioners as a group and the sources read do not state how many were referred, so others are unquantified. The applicant company is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"ZA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.itweb.co.za/article/lawyers-face-probe-for-using-hallucinating-genai-in-court/Pero3MZ3221qQb6m","primarySourceLabel":"ITWeb, 2 July 2025: Lawyers face probe for using hallucinating GenAI in court","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-14T03:03:33.803607+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-14T03:03:33.803607+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["south-africa","johannesburg","high-court","fictitious-citations","legal-practice-council","legal-research-tool"]},{"id":"2025-uk-upper-tribunal-immigration-adviser-google-ai-mode-fake-case-in-appeal-grounds-regulator-self-report","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'he was the person responsible for the case and drafting of the grounds of 17th March 2025 in this matter.'; 'provide an explanation for the fact that the case Horleston v SSHD [2007] EWCA Civ 654 cited in the grounds of appeal to the Upper Tribunal is not available on BAILII'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Grounds of appeal dated 17 March 2025, drafted by the adviser, cited a case (Horleston v SSHD [2007] EWCA Civ 654) that the Upper Tribunal could not find, under the citation of an unrelated case; the tribunal issued a show cause notice.","causal_attribution":"Established by the judgment's own record of the show cause notice and the adviser's response."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'We confirm unequivocally that no AI large language model (such as ChatGPT) was used in drafting the grounds of appeal.'; 'In absence of an explanation and with how AI operates, I cannot dismiss the fact that the case was an AI creation as there is no other explanation.'; 'his best guess was that he had inadvertently used the “AI Mode” of a Google search by clicking on this on the bar under the search topic.'; 'concluded himself that it was probable that this had happened because of the inadvertent use of an AI large language model'; 'As far as the Panel could establish there had never been a reported case called Horleston but Google AI nevertheless can, depending on the question posed, produce information such as panels of Court of Appeal judges who sat on this non-existent case'; 'By asking Google AI the same question in slightly different ways, we were able to elicit various different compositions of the bench which decided that fictitious case.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The adviser first denied using an AI large language model, later said he could not dismiss that the case was an AI creation, and at the hearing gave as his best guess that he had inadvertently used Google's 'AI Mode'; the tribunal found he had concluded it was probable the fake case came from inadvertent AI use, and the panel elicited varying benches for the fictitious case from Google AI.","causal_attribution":"The tribunal documents what the adviser said and its own test of Google AI; the source of the case in the drafting rests on his conclusion and best guess, so the claim is reported."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'reported himself to the IAA and to the SRA for having unknowingly inserted a non-existent case in grounds of appeal'; 'has already done this and there is no need for us to do so. If he had not done this we wish to make it clear that we would have made a referral'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The adviser reported himself to the IAA and the SRA for having unknowingly inserted a non-existent case, and the tribunal made no referral for that reason, stating it would otherwise have referred him.","causal_attribution":"Established by the judgment's findings and its stated decision on referral."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'he had put client emails he had drafted explaining Home Office decisions into ChatGPT to try to improve them and he had uploaded Home Office decision letters to this platform to summarise them for clients.'; 'He informed us that he now realises that this is a data breach and will inform the clients that he has done this, as well as the IAA and the SRA.'; 'to put client letters and decision letters from the Home Office into an open source AI tool, such as ChatGPT, is to place this information on the internet in the public domain, and thus to breach client confidentiality and waive legal privilege'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The adviser told the tribunal he had put client emails explaining Home Office decisions into ChatGPT and uploaded Home Office decision letters to it to summarise them, called this a data breach he would disclose to the clients, the IAA and the SRA; the tribunal said such uploads breach client confidentiality and waive legal privilege.","causal_attribution":"The uploads rest on the adviser's own account as recorded by the tribunal; the tribunal's statement on confidentiality is its own observation. The clients' number and whether they were told are not stated."}],"effects":[{"label":"non-existent case, probably from Google AI Mode by his own account, placed in appeal grounds he drafted","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"self-reported to the IAA and the SRA; the tribunal would otherwise have referred him","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukut/iac/2026/81","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Full judgment text read on Find Case Law (HTTP 200); no translation.","independence_group":"ukut-2026-81-judgment"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice","work"],"unknowns":["Whether the false case actually came from Google AI Mode; the judgment records the adviser's best guess and conclusion, with no search history or output","What effect, if any, the false case had on the appellant's permission application","How many clients' emails or decision letters were put into ChatGPT and whether they were informed","The outcome of the IAA and SRA self-reports"],"geography":{"basis":"Event: the grounds were filed with the First-tier and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), heard at Field House, and the adviser practises under the UK regulators IAA and SRA (judgment). Court: the Upper Tribunal. The adviser's and clients' countries of residence are not stated.","court_countries":["GB"],"event_countries":["GB"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published from the full Upper Tribunal judgment: it documents the false case in grounds the adviser drafted and his self-reports to two regulators, and records his conclusion that the case probably came from inadvertent AI use and his best guess that the tool was Google AI Mode, which the panel's own Google AI test illustrates. The AI source is attributed to his account; his separate account of uploading client documents to ChatGPT is context. The adviser is described by role; the anonymised appellant is not counted.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-11"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The judgment records the adviser's best guess that the non-existent case came from his inadvertent use of Google's 'AI Mode', and finds that he concluded it was probable the case was included because of inadvertent use of an AI large language model; the panel reproduced Google AI generating different benches for the same fictitious case. The output reached him through his own search (communicated_with) and went into the grounds that led to the show cause notice and his self-reports. This rests on his account as recorded by the tribunal; he first denied AI use. His separate account of putting client emails and Home Office decision letters into ChatGPT is described as context and is not part of this case's harm.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"UK Upper Tribunal: immigration adviser gives Google AI Mode as his best guess for a non-existent case in grounds he drafted; he self-reported to regulators","summary":"In the first of two matters decided together in [2026] UKUT 81 (IAC), promulgated on 17 November 2025, the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) examined grounds of appeal dated 17 March 2025 that cited a non-existent Court of Appeal case under the citation of an unrelated equal-pay case. The adviser who drafted them first denied using AI, then told the tribunal his best guess was that he had inadvertently used Google's 'AI Mode', and the tribunal recorded that he had concluded it was probable the case came from inadvertent AI use; the panel itself got Google AI to produce varying benches for the fictitious case. He reported himself to the Immigration Advice Authority and the Solicitors Regulation Authority, and the tribunal said it would otherwise have referred him. He also told the tribunal that he had put client emails and uploaded Home Office decision letters into ChatGPT to summarise them, which he called a data breach he would disclose to the clients; the tribunal said such uploads breach client confidentiality and waive privilege.","incidentDate":"2025-03-17","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-11-17","aiSystem":"Google search 'AI Mode', identified by the adviser as his best guess for the source of the false case","aiProduct":"Google AI Mode (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the Upper Tribunal's judgment, an immigration adviser placed a non-existent case in appeal grounds, which the tribunal found he had concluded probably came from inadvertent AI use (his best guess: Google AI Mode); he self-reported to the IAA and the SRA, and the tribunal said it would otherwise have referred him.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One counted person: the adviser, who used the AI and faced the regulatory consequence. His clients whose emails and decision letters he said he put into ChatGPT belong to a separate, undated matter described as context and are not counted. The appellant in the matter is not counted because no consequence of the false case for the appeal is stated.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"GB","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukut/iac/2026/81","primarySourceLabel":"Find Case Law, [2026] UKUT 81 (IAC), UK v SSHD (AI hallucinations; supervision; Hamid), promulgated 17 November 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-11T03:13:21.379148+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T07:27:35.689369+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-hallucination","fabricated-citations","legal","immigration","tribunal","google-ai-mode","united-kingdom","communicated-with"]},{"id":"2026-kedah-school-ai-generated-sexual-images-and-videos-alleged-to-involve-teachers-and-pupils-mcmc-complaint","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia (MCMC) menerima aduan berhubung penyalahgunaan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (AI) di media sosial bagi menghasilkan dan menyebarkan gambar serta video berunsur seksual yang didakwa melibatkan guru dan pelajar sebuah sekolah di Kedah","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"menerima aduan berhubung penyalahgunaan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (AI) bagi menghasilkan dan menyebarkan gambar serta video berunsur seksual yang didakwa membabitkan pelajar dan guru sebuah sekolah di Kedah","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"confirms it has received a complaint over the misuse of artificial intelligence (AI) to create and distribute sexual images and videos, allegedly of students and teachers at a school in Kedah","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"MCMC says it received a complaint about the misuse of AI technology on social media to produce and spread sexual images and videos alleged to involve teachers and pupils of a school in Kedah.","causal_attribution":"The complaint alleges AI production; MCMC relays the allegation and neither outlet examined the material."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"MCMC berkata, isu berkenaan turut membabitkan pelbagai agensi termasuk Kementerian Komunikasi, Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN), Kementerian Pendidikan (KPM) dan Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM), mengikut bidang kuasa masing-masing","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"boleh dikenakan tindakan di bawah Seksyen 233 Akta Komunikasi dan Multimedia 1998 (Akta 588)","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"pihaknya akan bekerjasama dengan agensi berkaitan termasuk Kementerian Komunikasi, Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN), Kementerian Pendidikan (KPM) dan Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) bagi menjalankan siasatan","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"In a statement on Thursday (Oct 8), MCMC said misusing AI to create or distribute sexual content that could affect the safety, dignity and well-being of victims, particularly children, is subject to action under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"MCMC says it will cooperate with the Ministry of Communications, the Home Ministry, the Ministry of Education and the Royal Malaysia Police in the investigation, and cites Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 and Section 18 of the Online Safety Act 2025 as the applicable provisions.","causal_attribution":"Regulatory response; no causal attribution."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"MCMC turut mengingatkan orang ramai supaya tidak menghasilkan, memuat naik atau menyebarkan semula kandungan seksual yang melibatkan atau didakwa melibatkan kanak-kanak","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"perbuatan itu bukan sahaja boleh memudaratkan mangsa, malah berpotensi menjejaskan proses siasatan pihak berkuasa","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"MCMC asked the public not to produce, upload or reshare sexual content involving or alleged to involve children, saying this could harm the victims and hinder the investigation.","causal_attribution":"MCMC’s public advisory; the reference to children is general and does not state the ages of the pupils in this complaint."}],"effects":[{"label":"AI-made sexual images and videos alleged to involve teachers and pupils of a Kedah school, spread on social media, per a complaint reported by MCMC","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://malaysiatribune.news/mcmc-siasat-dakwaan-salah-guna-ai-hasilkan-kandungan-seksual-libatkan-guru-pelajar/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ms","translation_note":"Malay body read and translated by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-09 (HTTP 200); no human reviewer read or translated the article. Malaysia Tribune report (Cyberjaya dateline) of the MCMC statement.","independence_group":"mcmc-statement-8oct"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://themalaysiapress.com/2026/10/08/mcmc-terima-aduan-kandungan-seksual-ai-babit-pelajar-guru/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ms","translation_note":"Malay body read and translated by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-09 (HTTP 200); no human reviewer read or translated the article. The Malaysia Press report (Putrajaya dateline) of the same MCMC statement; same origin as s1.","independence_group":"mcmc-statement-8oct"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2026/10/08/mcmc-receives-complaint-over-ai-generated-porn-depicting-students-teachers","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English body fetched and read by verifier vls on 2026-10-09 (HTTP 200), saved as bodies/verify-thestar-mcmc-kedah.txt; Bernama copy of the same MCMC statement of Thursday 8 October 2026; same origin as s1 and s2.","independence_group":"mcmc-statement-8oct"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["education","privacy"],"unknowns":["Who is depicted, how many people, and their ages; MCMC refers to teachers and pupils of one school and, generally, to children.","Which AI tool was used, what the images and videos show, who produced and spread them, and on which platform.","When the material was made and shared; the only date is the 8 October 2026 statement.","Whether the complaint has been verified, any arrest or charge, and any account from the school, the teacher or the families.","Whether the teachers and pupils are depicted in the material or otherwise involved: the Malay reports say the material is alleged to involve (“didakwa melibatkan”) them, and The Star’s English report renders this as “allegedly of” them."],"geography":{"basis":"The school is in Kedah, Malaysia, according to both outlets, and MCMC, a Malaysian regulator, received the complaint; the teachers and pupils the complaint refers to attend or work at that school. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["MY"],"affected_person_countries":["MY"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated) on two Malay-language reports and one English (Bernama) report of a regulator’s statement that it received a complaint of AI being used to produce and spread sexual images and videos alleged to involve teachers and pupils of a Kedah school. Every claim is attributed to MCMC’s statement; the three outlets relay one statement and are recorded as one independence group, so nothing is corroborated. No person or school is named by any source. Severity is low because the complaint is unverified and no individual consequence beyond the alleged depiction is reported.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-09"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"MCMC’s statement, reported in Malay by Malaysia Tribune and The Malaysia Press and in English (Bernama) by The Star, says the complaint concerns the misuse of artificial intelligence technology to produce and spread sexual images and videos alleged to involve teachers and pupils of a school in Kedah. MCMC refers to the people affected as victims, particularly children, and warns against resharing sexual content involving or alleged to involve children; The Star renders the allegation as images and videos “allegedly of students and teachers”. On that description the AI-produced material depicts those people (depicted_or_impersonated) and is itself the reported harm, a non-consensual sexual depiction circulated on social media; whether every teacher and pupil the complaint refers to is depicted is not stated. The identification of AI comes from the complaint as relayed by the regulator; no outlet examined the material or identified the tool, so the status is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Kedah, Malaysia: regulator says a complaint alleges AI was used to make and spread sexual images and videos involving teachers and pupils of a school","summary":"On 8 October 2026 the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) said in a statement, reported by Malaysia Tribune, The Malaysia Press and The Star, that it had received a complaint about the misuse of artificial intelligence on social media to produce and spread sexual images and videos alleged to involve teachers and pupils of a school in Kedah. MCMC said it would investigate with the Ministry of Communications, the Home Ministry, the Ministry of Education and the Royal Malaysia Police, cited the offences and penalties that could apply, and asked the public not to produce, upload or reshare sexual content involving or alleged to involve children. The complaint is unverified: the people depicted, their number and ages, the tool and the person responsible are not described.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-08","aiSystem":"Artificial intelligence technology, not identified, which according to the complaint reported by MCMC was misused on social media to produce and spread sexual images and videos alleged to involve teachers and pupils of a school in Kedah","aiProduct":"Unidentified image and video tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to a complaint reported by MCMC, AI-made sexual images and videos alleged to involve teachers and pupils of a Kedah school were produced and spread on social media; MCMC says such content can affect the safety, dignity and well-being of victims, especially children. No individual consequence is reported and the complaint has not been verified.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"No reliable count: the statement says the material is alleged to involve “guru dan pelajar” (teachers and pupils) of one school without giving a number; Malay does not mark number and the Bernama English reports say “students and teachers”, so no numeric minimum is recorded. Zero placeholders are used; the people depicted are not AI users.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"MY","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://malaysiatribune.news/mcmc-siasat-dakwaan-salah-guna-ai-hasilkan-kandungan-seksual-libatkan-guru-pelajar/","primarySourceLabel":"Malaysia Tribune, 8 October 2026: MCMC siasat dakwaan salah guna AI hasilkan kandungan seksual libatkan guru, pelajar","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-09T03:40:02.257247+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T03:40:02.257247+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","non_consensual_intimate_imagery","education","regulatory_investigation","malaysia"]},{"id":"2026-chile-puente-alto-school-ai-fake-nude-images-classmates-superintendencia","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Luego, las imágenes eran intervenidas mediante herramientas de inteligencia artificial, con las que se modificaban para generar las representaciones falsas.'; 'Las imágenes comenzaron a compartirse mediante plataformas digitales y terminaron llegando a otros estudiantes del establecimiento.'; 'La situación se conoció el 10 de julio, cuando un grupo de estudiantes encontró el material en la galería del celular de uno de los involucrados.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'encontraron en el celular de uno de sus compañeros imágenes sexuales falsas de ellas mismas y otras estudiantes del establecimiento'; 'Las fotografías habían sido creadas mediante inteligencia artificial a partir de imágenes comunes y corrientes obtenidas desde redes sociales.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Ordinary photos that female students had posted on Instagram were altered with AI tools into fake nude images, which circulated among other students; the case came to light on 10 July 2026 when students found the material on a classmate's phone.","causal_attribution":"Families' account as reported by Teletrece; no official finding on how the images were made is reported."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'cuatro alumnos participaron en las distintas etapas de este proceso, desde la obtención de las fotografías hasta la circulación del material.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the families, four students took part in obtaining the photos, altering them and circulating the material.","causal_attribution":"Attributed by Teletrece to the families of the affected students."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Algunas alumnas presentaron crisis de pánico, según relataron posteriormente sus apoderados.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Some of the affected students had panic attacks, according to their parents.","causal_attribution":"Parents' account."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'el establecimiento aplicó una suspensión de 15 días a los estudiantes señalados como responsables.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'El colegio suspendió por 15 días a los estudiantes señalados por su participación en la creación y difusión del material.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The school suspended the students identified as responsible for 15 days.","causal_attribution":"Reported by Teletrece; the school did not respond to questions."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'durante el primer recreo los estudiantes comenzaron a burlarse de las jóvenes. Tres de ellas reaccionaron y fueron a golpearlos.'; 'Tuvimos que poner denuncias en PDI y todo el tema porque el padre andaba rondando el colegio'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"After the suspended students returned, a parent says they mocked the affected girls, three of the girls hit them, and the father of one of the students involved then made threats; she says they had to file reports with the PDI because the father was then loitering near the school.","causal_attribution":"One parent's account to Teletrece; the father's account is not reported."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'El organismo informó que otorgó máxima prioridad al caso'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'está siendo sometido a una investigación formal por el caso y señaló que la situación recibió máxima prioridad.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Superintendencia de Educación confirmed that the school is under formal investigation over the case and said the matter received maximum priority.","causal_attribution":"Superintendency confirmation as reported by Teletrece."}],"effects":[{"label":"fake nude images of female students made with AI from their own photos circulated among schoolmates","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"some affected students had panic attacks, according to their parents","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.t13.cl/noticia/nacional/mama-paso-algo-grave-apoderados-denuncian-abuso-sexual-digital-contra-sus-hijas-3-10-2026","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read live in Spanish on 2026-10-04 (T13, 3 October 2026, Reportajes Teletrece). Reconstructs the case from families' accounts. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"t13-reportajes-puente-alto"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.t13.cl/noticia/nacional/se-veran-bien-cara-marcada-amenaza-padre-estudiante-agredido-tras-difundir-imag-3-10-2026","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read live in Spanish on 2026-10-04 (T13, 3 October 2026). Same Teletrece reporting; adds the suspension, the fight, the threats and the Superintendency's confirmation. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"t13-reportajes-puente-alto"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["education","privacy"],"unknowns":["When the images were made and first shared; 10 July 2026 is the date students found them.","Which AI tool was used.","How many students were depicted.","Whether a criminal complaint was filed over the images themselves, and any prosecutor action.","The outcome of the Superintendency's investigation."],"geography":{"basis":"The school is in Puente Alto and the case is under investigation by Chile's Superintendencia de Educación (T13). No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["CL"],"affected_person_countries":["CL"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case: AI-altered fake nude images depicting identifiable minors circulated in their school, with reported distress, school sanctions and a regulator's investigation. The account rests on one Teletrece reporting chain built on families' testimony, with the Superintendency's confirmation. Minors are not named, the school name is withheld from public fields, and the images are not described beyond the source's general description.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-04"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Teletrece, citing the families' account, says the students' photos were altered with AI tools to create the false images. No tool is named and no forensic or official finding on AI use is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Chile: Puente Alto students find AI-made fake nude images of female classmates, families say; school suspends those involved, Superintendency investigates","summary":"Teletrece reported on 3 October 2026 that on 10 July 2026 female students at a secondary school in Puente Alto, Chile, found fake sexual images of themselves and other students on a classmate's phone. Families say the images were made with AI tools from ordinary photos the girls had posted on Instagram, that four students took part in obtaining, editing and circulating them, and that the material reached other students. Some of the girls had panic attacks, according to their parents. The school suspended the students identified as responsible for 15 days; after their return, parents say, they mocked the girls, a fight followed, and a parent accuses the father of one of the students involved of threats and of loitering near the school, after which she says they filed reports with the PDI. The Superintendencia de Educación confirmed a formal investigation of the school.","incidentDate":"2026-07-10","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-03","aiSystem":"Unnamed AI tools used to alter students' social-media photos into fake nude images (per families' account to Teletrece)","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"AI-made fake nude images of female secondary-school students circulated among their schoolmates; parents report panic attacks, and the case led to suspensions, a physical fight, threats and a regulator's investigation of the school (families via Teletrece).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":3,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"At least three affected female students are counted: T13 says three of the affected girls confronted the students involved after their return. Teletrece says the material affected students from primero to cuarto medio without giving a number, so more affected students are unquantified. The father's threats are not counted separately.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"CL","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.t13.cl/noticia/nacional/mama-paso-algo-grave-apoderados-denuncian-abuso-sexual-digital-contra-sus-hijas-3-10-2026","primarySourceLabel":"T13, 3 October 2026: Mamá, pasó algo grave: apoderados denuncian abuso sexual digital contra sus hijas mediante IA","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-04T03:47:21.211562+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-07T03:19:53.602734+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfakes","ai-generated-images","non-consensual-intimate-imagery","minors","school","chile","superintendencia-de-educacion","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-malang-ai-cloned-friend-voice-call-rp80-million-loss","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'membeberkan kasus terbaru yang menimpa seorang warga di Malang'; 'Korban terkecoh hingga menderita kerugian materiil mencapai Rp80 juta'; 'Pelaku memanfaatkan teknologi AI untuk mengkloning atau menirukan suara teman dekat korban secara sangat presisi, lalu menghubungi korban menggunakan nomor baru'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the head of OJK Malang, a resident of Malang lost Rp80 million after the perpetrator used AI to clone the voice of the resident's close friend and called from a new number to ask for a transfer.","causal_attribution":"The official's account as reported by one outlet; the basis for identifying the voice as an AI clone is not given."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Begitu suara orang terdekatnya berhasil dikloning dengan AI, pelaku menghubungi korban untuk meminta transfer uang'; 'Korban percaya penuh karena suaranya identik'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The official said the perpetrator called to ask for a money transfer and the victim believed the voice because it sounded identical.","causal_attribution":"The official's quoted description, which is partly phrased as a general method; attributed to the official."}],"effects":[{"label":"lost Rp80 million after a call in an AI-cloned voice of a close friend","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://malang-post.com/2026/10/02/warga-malang-rugi-rp80-juta-akibat-kloning-suara-ai-ojk-minta-masyarakat-waspada-modus-deepfake/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"id","translation_note":"Read in Indonesian on 2026-10-03 (HTTP 200). Researcher translation. Reports the OJK Malang head's remarks on a Radio City Guide FM talk show; the broadcast itself was not heard.","independence_group":"malang-post-ojk"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["finance","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["When the call and the transfer happened.","Whether the victim reported it to police, the bank or OJK, and whether any money was recovered.","How the voice was established to be an AI clone and which tool was used.","The platform or phone service used for the call."],"geography":{"basis":"The official describes the case as one that befell a resident of Malang, East Java, Indonesia (Malang Post). No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["ID"],"affected_person_countries":["ID"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case: an AI-cloned voice impersonating a friend was used to speak to a person and obtain Rp80 million, according to a named regulator official as reported by one outlet. The victim is unidentified in the source; no detail beyond the official's account is added.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-03"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Malang Post reports the head of OJK Malang as saying the perpetrator used AI to clone the voice of the victim's close friend and called the victim in that voice. The AI-generated voice was the channel through which the victim was spoken to (communicated_with), and it impersonated the friend (depicted_or_impersonated). No forensic detail, recording or tool is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with","depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Malang, East Java: the head of the financial regulator's local office says a resident lost Rp80 million after a caller used an AI clone of a close friend's voice to ask for a transfer","summary":"Malang Post reported on 2 October 2026 that the head of the Malang office of Indonesia's Financial Services Authority (OJK), speaking on a Radio City Guide FM talk show that day, described the latest case to befall a resident of Malang. According to the report, the perpetrator used AI to clone the voice of the victim's close friend very precisely and called the victim from a new number to ask for a money transfer; the victim believed the voice and lost Rp80 million. No date, police report or arrest is given. The account is the OJK official's as reported by one outlet; the call was not heard and the victim is not identified.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-02","aiSystem":"AI used to clone the voice of the victim's close friend for a fraudulent call, according to the head of OJK Malang as reported (tool not identified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A Malang resident lost Rp80 million after a caller used an AI-cloned voice of the resident's close friend to ask for a transfer, according to the head of OJK Malang as reported by Malang Post.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the Malang resident who lost Rp80 million (OJK Malang head via Malang Post). The friend whose voice was cloned is not reported to have been harmed and is not counted. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"ID","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://malang-post.com/2026/10/02/warga-malang-rugi-rp80-juta-akibat-kloning-suara-ai-ojk-minta-masyarakat-waspada-modus-deepfake/","primarySourceLabel":"Malang Post, 2 October 2026: Malang resident loses Rp80 million to AI voice cloning, OJK warns","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-03T03:21:26.796339+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-03T03:21:26.796339+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["voice-cloning","impersonation-scam","fraud","east-java","indonesia","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-malaysia-mahathir-mourning-footage-manipulated-videos-mcmc-review","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'terdapat satu akaun di TikTok yang memuat naik video memaparkan keadaan Tun M yang sedang berada di sebelah jenazah Tun Dr Hasmah'; 'dipercayai telah menyunting video Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad yang sedang bersedih ketika berada di sebelah jenazah Tun Dr Siti Hasmah dengan meletakkan aksi wanita sedang menari'; 'kelihatan individu itu menyunting momen ketika Tun M sedang mengangkat tangan untuk berdoa dengan aksi sedang menari sambil duduk di atas kerusi roda'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A TikTok account posted a video of Mahathir grieving beside his wife's body edited to show a woman dancing beside him, and a second clip in which the moment he raised his hands in prayer was edited with dancing movements while seated in a wheelchair.","causal_attribution":"BuzzKini's description of videos shared by a Threads user; the videos were not inspected for this review."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Dilihat dari hasil video berkenaan ia dipercayai telah disunting dengan menggunakan artificial intelligence (AI).'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'sedang meneliti kandungan media sosial yang dipercayai menggunakan kecerdasan buatan (AI) bagi memanipulasi rakaman Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad ketika beliau melalui saat dukacita selepas pemergian isterinya'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The videos are believed to have been edited with AI.","causal_attribution":"Both sources hedge the AI attribution as a belief; no tool or forensic basis is reported."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Ramai netizen mengkritik dan mengecam tindakan tersebut serta meminta pihak berkuasa seperti MCMC dan polis untuk mengambil tindakan atas perbuatan tidak bermoral itu.'; 'mengambil tindakan segera terhadap pemilik akaun TikTok terbabit'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Many social media users condemned the edits and asked MCMC and the police to act against the account holder.","causal_attribution":"BuzzKini's account of social media reaction."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'MCMC sudah berhubung dengan platform media sosial berkaitan dan sedang meneliti kandungan berkenaan.'; 'menjejaskan maruah individu dan keluarga adalah perkara serius'; 'termasuk Akta Komunikasi dan Multimedia 1998 (Akta 588)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"MCMC said it had contacted the social media platforms concerned and was examining the content, that altering real footage in ways that can mislead or harm the dignity of an individual and family is serious, and that action could follow under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 if a breach is found.","causal_attribution":"MCMC statement as reported; no finding of a breach is reported."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Dr Siti Hasmah meninggal dunia pada 28 September lalu pada usia 100 tahun.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Siti Hasmah Mohd Ali died on 28 September 2026 aged 100.","causal_attribution":"Background fact; her death is not connected to the AI-edited videos."}],"effects":[{"label":"footage of him mourning beside his wife's body was edited to add dancing and posted on TikTok","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://utusanmelayuplus.com/mcmc-teliti-video-ai-manipulasi-saat-duka-tun-dr-mahathir/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ms","translation_note":"Read live in Malay on 2026-10-03 (Utusan Melayu, 2 October 2026); relays the MCMC statement. Harian Metro ran an item headlined 'MCMC teliti video AI manipulasi detik duka Tun Dr Mahathir', but only its description was retrieved and it was not used. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"mcmc-statement-2026-10-02"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://buzzkini.my/trending/2026/09/30/biadab-ramai-minta-pihak-berkuasa-ambil-tindakan-terhadap-individu-sunting-video-wanita-menari-ketika-tun-m-sedang-bersedih/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ms","translation_note":"Read live in Malay on 2026-10-03 (BuzzKini, 30 September 2026); describes the TikTok videos as shared by a Threads user and the public reaction. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"buzzkini-threads-tiktok"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Which tool was used and how the AI attribution was established.","Who operated the TikTok account, how widely the videos were seen, and whether the account's disappearance from TikTok (BuzzKini, 30 September) was a removal by the platform or by its holder.","Whether MCMC found a breach or took action.","Whether Mahathir or his family commented on the videos."],"geography":{"basis":"Utusan Melayu's photo caption places Mahathir at his wife's burial at the Pusara Negara in Putrajaya, and BuzzKini says she died at the Institut Jantung Negara in Kuala Lumpur, so he was in Malaysia during the mourning the footage shows. Neither source says where the edited videos were made or posted from; the Malaysian regulator's review does not establish an event location. No court is involved.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["MY"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case: edited videos depicted a former prime minister mourning his wife, reportedly made with AI, and the national communications regulator said it was examining them. He is a public figure and is named as the sources do. Two independent accounts (BuzzKini's report of the videos; the MCMC statement, which does not describe the content, so its link to the TikTok videos is inferred); both hedge the AI attribution.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-03"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"BuzzKini says that, judging from the result, the videos are believed ('dipercayai') to have been edited with artificial intelligence. MCMC's statement, as reported by Utusan Melayu, refers to content believed ('dipercayai') to use AI to manipulate the footage. Neither names a tool or explains how the attribution was made, and the videos were not inspected. The edited videos depict Mahathir (depicted_or_impersonated).","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Malaysia: footage of former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad mourning his wife was edited, in what sources believe was AI manipulation, to add dancing, and posted on TikTok in September 2026; the communications regulator MCMC said it was examining content believed to use AI to manipulate footage of him in mourning","summary":"Tun Dr Siti Hasmah Mohd Ali, wife of former Malaysian prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, died on 28 September 2026 aged 100. BuzzKini reported on 30 September that a TikTok account had posted a video of Mahathir grieving beside her body, edited to show a woman dancing next to him, and another clip of the moment he raised his hands in prayer edited with dancing movements while seated in a wheelchair. BuzzKini says the edits are believed to have been made with AI, and that many social media users condemned them and asked the regulator and police to act. On 2 October the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) said it was examining social media content believed to use AI to manipulate footage of Mahathir in mourning, had contacted the platforms concerned, and that action could follow under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 if a breach was found.","incidentDate":"2026-09-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-30","aiSystem":"Edited videos of Mahathir Mohamad mourning his wife, posted by a TikTok account; BuzzKini says they are believed to have been edited with AI and MCMC describes content believed to use AI. The tool and the account holder are not identified","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Footage of the former prime minister mourning beside his wife's body was edited, believed to be with AI, to add dancing and was posted on TikTok, prompting public condemnation and an MCMC review of content it said could harm the dignity of an individual and family (BuzzKini; MCMC via Utusan Melayu).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, Mahathir Mohamad, who is depicted in the edited footage (BuzzKini; Utusan Melayu). Viewers and commenters are not counted. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"MY","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://utusanmelayuplus.com/mcmc-teliti-video-ai-manipulasi-saat-duka-tun-dr-mahathir/","primarySourceLabel":"Utusan Melayu, 2 October 2026: MCMC teliti video AI manipulasi saat duka Tun Dr Mahathir","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-03T03:17:58.566577+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-03T03:17:58.566577+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-edited-video","deepfakes","public-figure","bereavement","tiktok","mcmc","malaysia","malay-language"]},{"id":"2026-queensland-school-teacher-charged-over-alleged-ai-images-of-staff-and-students","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Police allege the man used AI software to generate explicit images of staff and students.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"used a work-issued laptop and AI software to generate explicit images depicting staff members and students.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"the AI content was found in a former secondary teacher's school digital account.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Police allege that a former secondary school teacher used AI software on a work-issued laptop to generate explicit images depicting staff members and students of the school.","causal_attribution":"The allegation comes from a police statement and a school letter to parents, both relayed by one outlet. The images and the software were not seen by the reviewer and the charges are unproven."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"had been charged with four counts relating to generating and possessing child exploitation material, possessing child abuse material, and the misuse of a restricted computer","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"commenced in October after police were notified of explicit AI-generated content on a school employee's laptop.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The teacher was charged with four counts relating to generating and possessing child exploitation material, possessing child abuse material and misuse of a restricted computer, after an investigation that began in October when police were notified of the material on a school employee's laptop.","causal_attribution":"The charges establish only that police allege offences. No court outcome is reported in the inspected sources."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"There was no evidence to indicate that the AI-generated material had been distributed or shared by the staff member,","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"resulted in the teacher being immediately dismissed","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Queensland Police are in the process of contacting some members of our community as part of their ongoing investigation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"to secure the alleged explicit AI material, report it to police and terminate the teacher's employment.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The school said it had also notified the Queensland College of Teachers and the Office of the eSafety Commissioner.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The school reports that it secured the material, dismissed the teacher and notified the police, the Queensland College of Teachers and the eSafety Commissioner, and that there is no evidence the material was distributed or shared. Police are contacting some members of the school community.","causal_attribution":"These are the school's own statements about its response, relayed by the outlet. The absence of sharing is the school's statement and does not describe what police found."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"the misuse of AI to create child exploitation material was a serious criminal offence that causes real harm to victims.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A police officer stated in general terms that misuse of AI to create child exploitation material causes real harm to victims.","causal_attribution":"The statement is general and does not describe any individual depicted person's experience or any specific harm in this case."}],"effects":[{"label":"Staff members and students reportedly depicted in AI-generated explicit images made on a school laptop","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-24/school-teacher-charged-over-child-exploitation-material/106954930","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"abc-gold-coast-school-letter-and-police-statement"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-23/police-investigate-ai-generated-explicit-images/106950646","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"abc-gold-coast-school-letter-and-police-statement"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["education","privacy"],"unknowns":["When the images were created is not stated. Only the October 2025 discovery and dismissal are dated, so the event start date is unknown.","The number of staff members and students depicted is not stated.","The AI software is not named.","No source reports how any depicted person was affected. The adverse consequence is the reported creation of the images and the resulting police contact with some community members.","The school states there is no evidence of sharing. Police have not published a finding on that point in the inspected sources.","The charges are allegations and the court outcome is not reported."],"geography":{"basis":"Sources name Queensland Police, the Gold Coast, the Queensland College of Teachers and a Southport Magistrates Court appearance. The affected people are members of that school community.","court_countries":["AU"],"event_countries":["AU"],"affected_person_countries":["AU"]},"publication":{"basis":"Two ABC reports (23 and 24 July 2026) relay one school letter to parents and one police statement. All claims are reported allegations. The accused, students and staff are not named, no image detail is given, and the school is not named because the depicted students belong to it. The evidence of harm to depicted people is thin (no reported distribution), so severity is low. The creation date is unknown, so the case is published undated and outside the 2025 event-year count.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Police allege the former teacher used AI software to generate the images. The school says AI-generated material was found in the teacher's school digital account. No product is named and the material was not seen by the reviewer.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Queensland school teacher charged over alleged AI-generated explicit images of staff and students","summary":"ABC reported on 23 and 24 July 2026 that police in Queensland, Australia charged a former secondary school teacher at a school there with child exploitation and computer misuse offences. Police allege the teacher used AI software on a work-issued laptop to generate explicit images depicting staff members and students. Police say a nine-month investigation began in October after they were notified of the material, and the school says it dismissed the teacher in October 2025, notified police and regulators, and that there is no evidence the material was shared. The number of people depicted and the creation date are not stated.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-07-23","aiSystem":"Unspecified AI image-generation software","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","aiCompany":"Unknown","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Police allege AI-generated explicit images depicting staff members and students were made on a school laptop. The school says there is no evidence they were shared. No individual experience of harm is reported, and a police officer said in general terms that such material causes real harm to victims.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"The police statement (s1) says the images depict staff and students, and the ABC lede says staff members and students, both plural, which supports at least two depicted people. The actual number is not stated and no source reports how any depicted person was affected.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","platformType":"other","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-24/school-teacher-charged-over-child-exploitation-material/106954930","primarySourceLabel":"ABC News, 24 July 2026, school teacher charged over child exploitation material allegedly created using AI","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T13:28:35.598593+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:50.144809+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":[]},{"id":"2025-ikner-fsu-shooting","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Police investigate the scene of a shooting near the student union at Florida State University on April 17, 2025 in Tallahassee, Florida. Two people were killed and six injured in the attack.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'the mass shooting at Florida State University in Tallahassee on April 17, 2025, and the deaths of two people, with five others injured.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'The shooting, which took place on the FSU campus on April 17, 2025, injured six people and killed two people'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On 17 April 2025 a shooting at Florida State University in Tallahassee killed two people and wounded at least five others (five per Click Orlando; six per NPR's correction and ABC News).","causal_attribution":"The deaths and injuries were caused by the shooting. The record does not attribute them to ChatGPT; see c3 to c13 for the contested AI connection."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'was charged with two counts of first-degree murder and seven counts of attempted murder. He has pleaded not guilty.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'is facing multiple charges of murder and attempted murder for the April 2025 shooting near the student union on FSU's Tallahassee campus, where he was a student at the time.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Phoenix Ikner, an FSU student at the time, is accused of the shooting and charged with two counts of first-degree murder and seven counts of attempted murder, and has pleaded not guilty.","causal_attribution":"These are criminal charges; guilt has not been determined."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Through a public records request to the state attorney's office, News 6 obtained the thousands of conversations Ikner had with ChatGPT over the course of a year.'; '\"How do police investigate suicides?\"'; 'He then asks about the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting and the 1999 mass shooting at Columbine High School.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"ChatGPT transcripts released in court documents, which News 6 obtained from the state attorney's office, show Ikner conversing with ChatGPT over about a year, including questions about suicide and about terrorism and earlier mass shootings.","causal_attribution":"Describes the content of the conversations as reported from the transcripts; it does not establish that the conversations caused the shooting."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Then, in April, Ikner asks ChatGPT how the country would react to a shooting at FSU.'; 'Yes, a shooting at Florida State University involving three of more victims would almost certainly receive national media coverage'; 'After that, Ikner asks questions on 12-gauge shotguns, and Glocks, and how the safety buttons work.'; 'What time is it busiest in the FSU student union?'; 'Ikner asks, \"What about 3 plus at FSU?\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Court documents show that the suspected gunman Ikner communicated extensively with ChatGPT in the days, hours and minutes leading up to the tragic shooting, including asking about the busiest times at FSU'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"In April 2025 Ikner asked ChatGPT how the country would react to a shooting at FSU and asked \"What about 3 plus at FSU?\", and ChatGPT replied that such a shooting 'would almost certainly receive national media coverage'; Ikner then asked about 12-gauge shotguns, Glocks and how the safety buttons work, and what time the FSU student union is busiest.","causal_attribution":"Both outlets report the same court-record transcripts (one record chain, so reported). The questions and answers are evidence in the criminal case; whether the answers contributed to the attack is disputed (c8, c9)."},{"id":"c13","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'According to more than 13,000 messages reviewed and previously reported by the Phoenix'; 'Ikner's final request came three minutes before the shooting.'; 'What button is the safety off for the Remington 12 gauge?'; 'The AI provided detailed instructions.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s11"}],"assertion":"According to the Florida Phoenix's review of more than 13,000 messages, Ikner's final request to ChatGPT came three minutes before the shooting and asked which button turns the safety off on a Remington 12-gauge, and the AI provided detailed instructions.","causal_attribution":"Reported from the court-record transcripts (same chain as c4). It shows the timing and content of the exchange, not that the answer caused the shooting."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'At times, ChatGPT tells Ikner that it can't diagnose him, then explains clinical information on depression symptoms and suggests he speak to a counselor. It then suggests that if he needs immediate help to reach out to a crisis hotline, though it doesn't provide a number.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"When Ikner asked about mental health, ChatGPT at times explained depression symptoms, suggested speaking to a counselor and suggested a crisis hotline without giving a number.","causal_attribution":"Describes reported ChatGPT replies. OpenAI's motion, as WCTV reports it, says ChatGPT also referred Ikner to the 988 line (c9)."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'According to court filings, more than 200 AI messages have been entered into evidence in the case.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to court filings reported by NPR, more than 200 AI messages have been entered into evidence in the criminal case.","causal_attribution":"Establishes the reported evidentiary use of the messages, not their effect."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'consulted ChatGPT for advice before the shooting, including what type of gun to use, what ammunition went with it, and what time to go to campus to encounter more people, according to an initial review of Ikner's chat logs.'; 'issuing subpoenas to OpenAI seeking information about its policies and internal training materials'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'launched a criminal investigation into OpenAI and ChatGPT after prosecutors reviewed the chat logs.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On 21 April 2026 Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced a criminal investigation of OpenAI over the shooting, said an initial review of the chat logs showed Ikner consulted ChatGPT on the gun, ammunition and timing, and issued subpoenas for OpenAI policies and training materials dating back to March 2024.","causal_attribution":"The Attorney General's characterisation of the chat logs is an official allegation; no charge against OpenAI is reported."},{"id":"c8","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'JOSHI v. OPENAI FOUNDATION, 4:26-cv-00222, (N.D. Fla.) Date Filed: May 10, 2026'; 'SUMMONS ISSUED-PHOENIX IKNER'; 'by VANDANA JOSHI'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'MALL v. OPENAI FOUNDATION, 4:26-cv-00334, (N.D. Fla.) Date Filed: July 14, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'ASKINS v. OPENAI FOUNDATION, 4:26-cv-00335, (N.D. Fla.) Date Filed: July 14, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'GOURLEY v. OPENAI FOUNDATION, 4:26-cv-00416, (N.D. Fla.) Date Filed: Aug. 26, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"'MORALES v. OPENAI FOUNDATION, 4:26-cv-00425, (N.D. Fla.) Date Filed: Aug. 31, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"},{"locator":"'Attorneys representing the family of Florida State University shooting victim Tiru Chabba have filed a federal lawsuit against OpenAI'; 'The complaint, which was filed on Sunday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, also names the shooting suspect, Phoenix Ikner, as a defendant.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Vandana Joshi sued the OpenAI Foundation and Phoenix Ikner in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida on 10 May 2026 (Joshi v. OpenAI Foundation, 4:26-cv-00222), the suit ABC News reports as brought by the family of Tiru Chabba. Further suits against OpenAI Foundation were filed in the same court by Elizabeth Mall and Madison Askins on 14 July 2026, Reese Gourley on 26 August 2026 and Betty Morales on 31 August 2026.","causal_attribution":"The dockets establish that the suits exist and when they were filed. The plaintiffs' allegations that ChatGPT helped plan the attack are allegations; the Chabba family's attorney told ABC News Ikner used ChatGPT 'as his co-conspirator'. The Mall docket records a notice of related cases and the same discovery-consolidation order entered in Joshi; the connection of the later suits to the shooting rests on the press accounts listed in additional_sources, not on these docket headers."},{"id":"c9","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'we identified an account believed to be associated with the suspect and proactively shared this information with law enforcement.'; 'ChatGPT provided factual responses to questions with information that could be found broadly across public sources on the internet, and it did not encourage or promote illegal or harmful activity.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'ChatGPT is not responsible for this terrible crime.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"OpenAI's position is that ChatGPT is not responsible for the crime and provided factual responses with publicly available information, and that after the shooting it identified an account believed to be associated with the suspect and shared it with law enforcement.","causal_attribution":"OpenAI disputes that ChatGPT caused or contributed to the shooting."},{"id":"c10","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO CONFER REGARDING CONSOLIDATING DISCOVERY. The parties' joint reports are due on or before 9/29/2026.'; 'MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by AESTAS LLC'; 'Exhibit 1 - Chat Logs'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'24 Sep 22, 2026 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO CONFER REGARDING CONSOLIDATING DISCOVERY.'; 'The parties shall file their proposed consolidated discovery schedule on or before Friday, 10/2/2026.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"On 22 September 2026 the court in Joshi ordered the parties to confer about consolidating discovery, with joint reports due by 29 September 2026; on 25 September 2026 the OpenAI defendants moved to dismiss the suit for failure to state a claim, attaching a declaration and exhibits including chat logs.","causal_attribution":"The docket establishes that the order and the motion were filed; the court has not ruled on the motion."},{"id":"c11","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'At no point did Ikner tell ChatGPT that he was planning or intended to commit a shooting'; 'referred him to the 988 crisis line'; 'it had no legal duty to warn about or prevent Ikner'; 'holding it liable would violate free speech rights'; 'responses were consistently factual'; 'repeatedly encouraged him to'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"According to WCTV's account of the motion to dismiss, OpenAI argues that Ikner never told ChatGPT of a plan to commit a shooting, that ChatGPT's responses were consistently factual, that it encouraged Ikner to talk to someone and referred Ikner to the 988 crisis line when depression came up, that it had no legal duty to warn or prevent the crime, and that liability would violate free-speech rights.","causal_attribution":"These are OpenAI's litigation arguments as reported by WCTV; they dispute the plaintiffs' allegations and are not findings."},{"id":"c12","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'His trial is set to begin on Oct. 19.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'He is expected to stand trial on June 8, 2027, and could face the death penalty if convicted.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Ikner's criminal trial date has moved: NPR reported in April 2026 that the trial was set to begin on 19 October, and WCTV reported on 28 September 2026 that Ikner is expected to stand trial on 8 June 2027 and could face the death penalty if convicted.","causal_attribution":"Procedural status only. The June 2027 date is WCTV's report and was not confirmed from a Leon County court record."}],"effects":[{"label":"two people were killed and at least five wounded in the shooting near the FSU student union","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/04/21/nx-s1-5793967/florida-openai-investigation-mass-shooting-fsu","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"NPR, 21 April 2026 (corrected 7 May 2026). Body retained from the 2026-09-24 live read (html lang=en) and re-read for this review. Reports the Attorney General's press conference and OpenAI's statement to NPR.","independence_group":"npr"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.clickorlando.com/news/investigators/2026/04/09/fsu-shooting-suspect-used-chatgpt-to-help-plan-fatal-attack-court-records-show/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"WKMG News 6 (Click Orlando), 9 April 2026. Body retained from the 2026-09-24 live read and re-read. Quotes ChatGPT transcripts News 6 obtained from the state attorney's office by public-records request; NOPE did not inspect the transcripts.","independence_group":"state-attorney-transcripts"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://abcnews.com/US/family-fsu-shooting-victim-files-lawsuit-alleging-chatgpt/story?id=132845521","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"ABC News, 11 May 2026 (byline Deena Zaru). Read live on 2026-10-03 (HTTP 200) and re-read. Carries the plaintiffs' attorney's statements and OpenAI's statement to ABC.","independence_group":"abc-news"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.wctv.tv/2026/09/28/openai-seeks-dismissal-lawsuit-linking-chatgpt-fsu-campus-shooting-citing-free-speech/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"WCTV (Tallahassee), 28 September 2026. Read live on 2026-10-03 (HTTP 200) and re-read. Its account of the motion to dismiss quotes the motion, which WCTV calls the complaint or the lawsuit in places; NOPE did not read the motion itself.","independence_group":"wctv"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73320881/joshi-v-openai-foundation/","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener RECAP docket for Joshi v. OpenAI Foundation, 4:26-cv-00222 (N.D. Fla.), read live on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200; also the RECAP search API, HTTP 200). Docket entry text only; the motion and order PDFs were not read.","independence_group":"court-record-joshi"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73614528/mall-v-openai-foundation/","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener RECAP docket for Mall v. OpenAI Foundation, 4:26-cv-00334 (N.D. Fla.), read live on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Docket entry text only; entries through 30 Sep 2026 read.","independence_group":"court-record-mall"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73615017/askins-v-openai-foundation/","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener RECAP docket for Askins v. OpenAI Foundation, 4:26-cv-00335 (N.D. Fla.), read live on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Docket header only.","independence_group":"court-record-askins"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74707084/gourley-v-openai-foundation/","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener RECAP docket for Gourley v. OpenAI Foundation, 4:26-cv-00416 (N.D. Fla.), read live on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Docket header only.","independence_group":"court-record-gourley"},{"id":"s9","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74722578/morales-v-openai-foundation/","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener RECAP docket for Morales v. OpenAI Foundation, 4:26-cv-00425 (N.D. Fla.), read live on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Docket header only.","independence_group":"court-record-morales"},{"id":"s10","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74806746/grant-v-openai-inc/","kind":"court_record","access":"unavailable","language":null,"translation_note":"CourtListener docket for Grant v. OpenAI Inc., 4:26-cv-00459 (N.D. Fla.). Returned HTTP 202 with an empty body twice on 2026-10-04; the removal facts in the narrative are carried forward from the 2026-09-17 review and were not re-inspected here.","independence_group":"court-record-grant"},{"id":"s11","url":"https://www.wlrn.org/government-politics/2026-04-21/uthmeier-investigating-whether-chatgpt-is-criminally-liable-for-fsu-shooting","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"WLRN, 21 April 2026, by Liv Caputo of the Florida Phoenix (States Newsroom), read live on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Its chat-log passages relay the Florida Phoenix's own review of more than 13,000 messages from the court records, so they share the court-record transcript chain with Click Orlando and WCTV.","independence_group":"state-attorney-transcripts"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use","others_use"],"contexts":["education","justice","health"],"unknowns":["Whether ChatGPT's answers contributed to the attack is contested and undetermined; no court has ruled on the civil claims and the criminal trial has not taken place.","The total number of messages is reported differently: the Florida Phoenix reviewed more than 13,000 messages, and the Chabba family's attorney told ABC News of 16,000 'disturbing chats'. Neither figure was established from a court record in this review.","The Leon County criminal docket was not inspected; the June 8, 2027 trial date rests on WCTV's report.","The motion to dismiss, the discovery order and the complaints were read only as docket entries or through press accounts, not as documents.","The Grant removal docket and the other retained press sources (AP, CNN, NBC News, WJHG, Tallahassee Reports, Florida Phoenix, WTXL, WCTV August 2026, Tallahassee Democrat via Yahoo) were not re-inspected in this review; the narrative's account of those suits is carried forward from earlier reviews.","Whether OpenAI's systems flagged Ikner's account before the shooting is not reported."],"geography":{"basis":"Carried forward from the 2026-09-24 metadata review and re-checked: NPR and Click Orlando place the shooting at Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida, where those killed and wounded were. The criminal case is in Florida, and the civil suits are in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida (CourtListener dockets). The victims' countries of residence are recorded from the location of the shooting; WCTV describes Chabba as a South Carolina father.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Two deaths and the injuries are reported by NPR, Click Orlando and ABC News. Ikner's ChatGPT use is reported from court-record transcripts and acknowledged by OpenAI's account identification. Civil suits and the September 2026 motion to dismiss are documented on CourtListener dockets. The AI connection is alleged by the Attorney General and plaintiffs and disputed by OpenAI; causation is not established.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-04"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"ChatGPT transcripts obtained by News 6 from the state attorney's office through a public-records request show the accused, Ikner, asking ChatGPT about a shooting at FSU, firearm safety mechanisms and the busiest time at the student union; NPR reports more than 200 AI messages entered into evidence, and OpenAI says it identified an account believed to be associated with the suspect. The killed and wounded are third parties harmed by Ikner's use. Whether ChatGPT contributed to the attack is contested: the plaintiffs and Florida's Attorney General allege it did, and OpenAI says ChatGPT gave factual, publicly available information and is not responsible.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Carried forward from the 2026-09-15 metadata review and now supported by inspected bodies. NPR and Click Orlando place the shooting near the student union of Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida, on 17 April 2025, where the two people killed and those wounded were; the criminal case is in Florida and the civil suits in the Northern District of Florida and Leon County (retained row). This is a metadata review and does not verify the account of AI involvement.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"at Florida State University in Tallahassee","location":"summary","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"N.D. Fla.","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'Police investigate the scene of a shooting near the student union at Florida State University on April 17, 2025 in Tallahassee, Florida. Two people were killed and six injured in the attack.'","location":"https://www.npr.org/2026/04/21/nx-s1-5793967/florida-openai-investigation-mass-shooting-fsu","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'the mass shooting at Florida State University in Tallahassee on April 17, 2025, and the deaths of two people, with five others injured.'","location":"https://www.clickorlando.com/news/investigators/2026/04/09/fsu-shooting-suspect-used-chatgpt-to-help-plan-fatal-attack-court-records-show/","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'the April 2025 shooting near the student union on FSU's Tallahassee campus'","location":"https://www.npr.org/2026/04/21/nx-s1-5793967/florida-openai-investigation-mass-shooting-fsu","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The 18 additional sources cited by the retained row (AP, WLRN, CNN, NBC, WJHG, Tallahassee Reports, Florida Phoenix, WTXL, WCTV, the Tallahassee Democrat via Yahoo and five CourtListener dockets) were not re-inspected in this pass; an AP Wayback capture was fetched but not reviewed. Their languages remain unreviewed.","The victims' countries of residence are recorded from the location of the shooting; no source states their residence separately."],"reviewed_on":"2026-09-24","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/04/21/nx-s1-5793967/florida-openai-investigation-mass-shooting-fsu","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-24 (NPR, 21 April 2026; html lang=en). Reports the Florida Attorney General's criminal investigation of OpenAI, the shooting near the FSU student union in Tallahassee on 17 April 2025 (two killed, six wounded per NPR's correction), the accused's ChatGPT queries per the AG's review of chat logs, OpenAI's statement and the trial date of 19 October.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.clickorlando.com/news/investigators/2026/04/09/fsu-shooting-suspect-used-chatgpt-to-help-plan-fatal-attack-court-records-show/","notes":"Read live on 2026-09-24 (WKMG News 6, 9 April 2026; html lang=en). Investigation based on ChatGPT transcripts obtained by public records request; places the shooting at FSU in Tallahassee on 17 April 2025 and describes the questions the accused put to the chatbot.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Florida State University Shooting (Phoenix Ikner's ChatGPT Questions Before the Attack)","summary":"On April 17, 2025, a shooting near the student union at Florida State University in Tallahassee killed two people and wounded at least five others. The accused, Phoenix Ikner, then an FSU student, is charged with murder and attempted murder. ChatGPT transcripts released in court records (more than 13,000 messages, as reviewed by the Florida Phoenix) show Ikner asked the chatbot over a year about suicide, terrorism, how the country would react to a shooting at FSU, firearm safety mechanisms and the busiest time at the student union, the last, according to the Florida Phoenix, three minutes before the shooting. Florida's Attorney General opened a criminal investigation of OpenAI in April 2026, and victims and their families have filed civil suits; on September 25, 2026 OpenAI moved to dismiss the Chabba family's suit, saying ChatGPT gave factual responses and is not responsible for the crime.","incidentDate":"2025-04-17","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-04-09","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation","crisis_response","method_provision"],"harmOutcomes":["death","physical_injury","harm_to_others","legal_harm","loss_of_liberty"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A shooting at Florida State University on 17 April 2025 killed two people and wounded at least five; the accused, Phoenix Ikner, has pleaded not guilty. ChatGPT transcripts released in court records, as reported by Click Orlando and the Florida Phoenix, include firearm and student-union timing questions in the hours and minutes before the attack.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1c","P1d","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"outward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":7,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"Two people were killed and at least five wounded in the shooting (Click Orlando reports five injured; NPR's 7 May 2026 correction and ABC News report six). The lower reported injury count is used. The participant count of one is the accused, Ikner, who used ChatGPT and has been charged with two counts of first-degree murder and seven counts of attempted murder (ABC News); the legal_harm outcome refers to him.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-FL","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.npr.org/2026/04/21/nx-s1-5793967/florida-openai-investigation-mass-shooting-fsu","primarySourceLabel":"NPR — Florida AG opens OpenAI investigation over FSU shooting","firstPublishedAt":"2026-04-28T13:00:04.410579+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-04T03:21:55.18827+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["criminal-investigation","lawsuit","shooting","mass-violence","chatgpt","openai","fsu","florida","us","regulatory"]},{"id":"2025-grok-non-consensual-image-generation","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'image generation and editing are currently limited to paying subscribers'; the standalone app/X tab complied with undress requests including NBC's consenting test subject.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"AP: Grok let users 'undress people, putting females in transparent bikinis or revealing clothing'; some images appeared to include children.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'Over the past several weeks, Grok allowed users to create and publicly post sexually altered images of real people at the click of a button.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"}],"assertion":"From late December 2025, Grok's image generation and editing on X and the standalone app let users generate sexualized images of real people at scale; xAI limited generation to paying subscribers on 9 January 2026, but NBC's own consenting test found the standalone app and X tab still complied with 'undress' requests.","causal_attribution":"The conduct is established by NBC's direct test plus official accounts; the paywall change's limited effect is NBC's finding."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Genevieve Oh's analysis: 7,751 sexualized images in one hour Wednesday, up 16.4% from 6,659/hr Monday.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"NYT via NC DOJ: 'generated and posted 4.4 million images, of which at least 41 percent were sexualized images of women' over nine days.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"CCDH via Engadget: 'an estimated 3 million sexualized images over 11 days, including 23,000 of minors'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"}],"assertion":"Scale analyses: Genevieve Oh's analysis found 7,751 sexualized images generated in one hour on a Wednesday (up 16.4% from 6,659/hour on Monday); the New York Times reported 4.4 million images over nine days, at least 41% sexualized images of women; an AP analysis of 20,000 images from 25 December-1 January found 2% appeared to be 18 or younger; CCDH estimated about 3 million sexualized images over 11 days including roughly 23,000 of minors.","causal_attribution":"Each figure belongs to its own analysis (Oh; NYT; AP via Fortune; CCDH); none is platform-confirmed and they are not merged. The AP 20,000-image analysis is carried via Fortune. The Bloomberg ~6,700/hour, 84-85x figure is recorded as unavailable."},{"id":"c3a","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I felt horrified, I felt violated, especially seeing my toddler's backpack in the back of it'; image of her at 14 undressed, up ~12 hrs, removed after the Guardian sought comment.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Ashley St. Clair said users sexualized images of her, including one of her at 14 that stayed up about 12 hours and was removed after the Guardian sought comment: 'I felt horrified, I felt violated.'","causal_attribution":"Her account to the Guardian; her own lawsuit is a separate held row and is not merged here."},{"id":"c3b","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'dehumanised and reduced into a sexual stereotype'; 'others asked Grok to generate more of her'; 'While it wasn't me that was in states of undress, it looked like me and it felt like me and it felt as violating.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Samantha Smith told the BBC she felt 'dehumanised and reduced into a sexual stereotype', and after she posted about it, others asked Grok to generate more of her.","causal_attribution":"Her account to the BBC."},{"id":"c3c","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'had seen an increase in people using Grok to undress her'; the 'sticking plaster' quote.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Dr Daisy Dixon, a Cardiff University lecturer, told the BBC she had seen an increase in people using Grok to undress her and called the paywall change 'a sticking plaster'.","causal_attribution":"Her account to the BBC."},{"id":"c4","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"IWF analysts found 'criminal imagery' of girls aged 11-13 apparently made with Grok.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"AI Forensics' review: ~800 archived URLs, <10% apparent CSAM ('photorealistic people, very young'), ~70 URLs reported to EU regulators.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The Internet Watch Foundation told the BBC its analysts found 'criminal imagery' of girls aged 11-13 apparently made with Grok; Wired and AI Forensics reviewed about 800 archived Grok Imagine URLs with under 10% apparent CSAM and reported about 70 URLs to EU regulators.","causal_attribution":"Two independent expert bodies' findings (IWF; AI Forensics); the minors are unnamed and uncounted per the counting rules."},{"id":"c5","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"NBC: Ofcom 'urgent contact'; Starmer 'disgraceful... X has got to get a grip'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"ICO announcement: formal investigations into XIUC and X.AI; follows the 7 January contact.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"AP via PBS: the EU's formal DSA investigation; 'materialized' risks; 'serious harm'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"NC DOJ release: the 35-AG letter and its demands.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"Engadget: the Baltimore suit; City Solicitor Thompson's statement.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"},{"locator":"TechPolicy.Press: the Amsterdam order of 26 March.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s13"},{"locator":"Reuters headline (body unavailable): Ireland DPC inquiry of 17 February.","relation":"context","source_id":"s11"}],"assertion":"Formal regulatory and legal actions followed: Ofcom's urgent contact (5 Jan; response by 9 Jan; investigation announced 12 Jan); the UK ICO's formal investigations into XIUC and X.AI LLC (3 Feb); the European Commission's formal DSA investigation (26 Jan, risks 'materialized' into 'serious harm'); Ireland's DPC GDPR inquiry (17 Feb); 35 US state attorneys general's demand letter (23 Jan); Baltimore's consumer-protection suit (24 Mar; D. Md. 1:26-cv-02103); and an Amsterdam court order to stop generating or distributing non-consensual sexualized images in the Netherlands (26 Mar, Offlimits suit, penalty up to €10 million).","causal_attribution":"Each action is carried by an inspected official or news source; the California AG probe (NBC) and the Indonesia/Malaysia/Philippines blocks (Reuters bodies unavailable) are recorded in the outcome and reported in the narrative."},{"id":"c6","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"AP: the X statement of 14 January ('bikinis, underwear or other revealing attire', where illegal).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"BBC (16 Mar): Musk's 'Literally zero' post of 14 January.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"}],"assertion":"xAI's 14 January statement said it would stop allowing users to depict people in 'bikinis, underwear or other revealing attire' where illegal; Musk posted on 14 January that he was 'not aware of any naked underage images... Literally zero'.","causal_attribution":"The company's and Musk's statements are recorded as their positions; the IWF and AI Forensics findings stand in tension with 'Literally zero' and are preserved as contrary evidence."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"BBC (20 Apr 2026): the 3 Feb raid, the summons, Musk's non-appearance, the DOJ refusal, and the probe's scope.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"}],"assertion":"Paris police raided X's offices on 3 February and summoned Musk and Yaccarino for 20 April; Musk did not appear, and the US DOJ declined to assist France; the French probe includes complicity in possession or organised distribution of child sexual abuse material.","causal_attribution":"Single inspected chain (BBC); attributed accordingly."}],"effects":[{"label":"industrial-scale non-consensual sexualized imagery of real people, including apparent minors, generated by Grok","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98p1r4e6m8o","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (2 Jan 2026). Samantha Smith's account.","independence_group":"bbc"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/x-paywall-ai-image-grok-app-bikini-allows-sexual-deepfakes-rcna252647","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (8 Jan 2026). Paywall change; NBC's own consenting test; Genevieve Oh's analysis; Starmer and Ofcom accounts.","independence_group":"nbc"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/05/elon-musk-ashley-st-clair-grok-fake-sexualised-images","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (5 Jan 2026). Ashley St. Clair's account.","independence_group":"guardian"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (9 Jan 2026, McMahon/Cress). Dr Daisy Dixon; the IWF finding.","independence_group":"bbc"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/grok-is-generating-sexual-content-far-more-graphic-than-whats-on-x/","kind":"news_investigation","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (7 Jan 2026, Burgess/Varner). AI Forensics' review of ~800 archived Grok Imagine URLs.","independence_group":"wired"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/ico-announces-investigation-into-grok/","kind":"regulator_announcement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (formal investigations into XIUC and X.AI LLC; follows the 7 January urgent-information contact).","independence_group":"ico"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/eu-investigates-musks-ai-chatbot-grok-over-sexual-deepfakes","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (AP, Kelvin Chan; 26 Jan 2026). EU DSA investigation; X's 14 January statement.","independence_group":"ap"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://ncdoj.gov/attorney-general-jeff-jackson-leads-bipartisan-coalition-demanding-xai-stop-creating-and-remove-groks-nonconsensual-sexual-images/","kind":"regulator_press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (23 Jan 2026). The 35-AG letter; quotes the New York Times' 4.4M/41% figure.","independence_group":"nc-doj"},{"id":"s9","url":"https://www.engadget.com/ai/baltimore-sues-xai-over-grok-deepfakes-214135922.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (24 Mar 2026). Baltimore suit; the CCDH estimate.","independence_group":"engadget"},{"id":"s10","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crk151nn7j3o","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (20 Apr 2026). Paris raid; Musk's non-appearance; DOJ refusal to assist France.","independence_group":"bbc"},{"id":"s11","url":"https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/ireland-opens-probe-into-musks-grok-ai-over-sexualised-images-2026-02-17/","kind":"wire_report","access":"unavailable","language":null,"translation_note":"HTTP 401 on 2026-09-15; headline and date verified from the URL and snapshot; body not read.","independence_group":"reuters"},{"id":"s12","url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-07/","kind":"news_report","access":"unavailable","language":null,"translation_note":"HTTP 403 on 2026-09-15; the ~6,700/hour, 84-85x analysis is attributed from the historical record and secondary references; body not read.","independence_group":"bloomberg"},{"id":"s13","url":"https://www.techpolicy.press/dutch-court-orders-x-grok-to-stop-aigenerated-sexual-abuse-content/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (27 Mar 2026). Amsterdam court order in the Offlimits case.","independence_group":"techpolicy-press"},{"id":"s14","url":"https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/ashley-st-clair-sues-xai-grok-sexual-images-rcna254302","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-09-15 (15 Jan 2026). St. Clair's suit; cross-reference to the related held row.","independence_group":"nbc"},{"id":"s15","url":"https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/64870891/MAYOR_AND_CITY_COUNCIL_OF_BALTIMORE_v_X_Corp_et_al","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Docket page read on 2026-09-15 (D. Md. 1:26-cv-02103; SpaceX dismissed without prejudice 17 Jul; MTD briefing under way as of 29 Jul).","independence_group":"court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life","justice"],"unknowns":["The Bloomberg analysis (~6,700 images/hour, 84-85x leading deepfake sites) could not be read (403) and is recorded without its body.","Whether the images remain hosted and downloadable (Wired's June 2026 follow-up, cited but not read) is unverified.","The N.D. Cal. class action's pseudonymity ruling of 30 July is known only through a blocked summary (internetcases 403).","The outcome of the Amsterdam order's penalty mechanism and xAI's compliance are not reported in the inspected sources.","The Indonesia/Malaysia/Philippines blocks and lifts are recorded from the historical record and headlines (Reuters/CNN bodies unavailable); dates may shift one day across carriers.","The historical claim of 'five countries acting within two weeks' is not precisely verified and is not claimed."],"geography":{"basis":"The generation and consumption were global and not tied to an inspected event location, so event and affected-person countries remain unknown rather than inferred from regulators or the company's seats. Court countries are limited to the documented proceedings: the US (Baltimore D. Md. suit; the related US suits) and the NL (Amsterdam court order). Regulatory actions by Ofcom, the ICO, the EU, the DPC, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines are not courts.","court_countries":["US","NL"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Restored under the 2026-09-15 charter as a harmful-artifact crisis (depicted_or_impersonated). Named victims are adults who spoke publicly; minors are never named and never counted from image statistics. Each scale figure is attributed to its own analysis; the victims' accounts are single-chain and recorded as reported. Related xAI suits (St. Clair, Tennessee minors, others) are separate held rows and are not merged.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"NBC's own consenting test confirmed the standalone Grok app and X tab complied with 'undress' requests after the 9 January paywall change; the victims' accounts, the IWF and AI Forensics reviews, and xAI's own 14 January restriction all establish the AI generation. The scale figures are attributed analyses, not platform-confirmed numbers.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Grok non-consensual sexual image generation wave (December 2025 - January 2026)","summary":"From late December 2025, xAI's Grok image editing on X let users generate sexualized images of real people at industrial scale, including images of named women and apparent minors. Analyses attributed to Genevieve Oh (7,751 sexualized images in one hour, via NBC), the New York Times (4.4 million images in nine days, at least 41% sexualized images of women, via the NC AG), the AP (2% of a 20,000-image sample appearing to be minors, via Fortune) and CCDH (about 3 million sexualized images over 11 days including roughly 23,000 of minors, via Engadget) documented the scale. Named women — Ashley St. Clair, Samantha Smith and Dr Daisy Dixon — described being undressed by Grok and revictimized when they objected. The wave triggered formal actions by Ofcom, the UK ICO, the EU (DSA), Ireland's DPC, 35 US state attorneys general, the California AG, Baltimore (consumer-protection suit), an Amsterdam court order, country blocks in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, and a Paris police raid; xAI restricted generation to paying subscribers on 9 January and narrowed the feature on 14 January 2026.","incidentDate":"2025-12-25","incidentEndDate":"2026-01-14","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-01-02","aiSystem":"Grok (image generation and editing on X and the standalone app)","aiProduct":"Grok","aiCompany":"SpaceXAI (formerly xAI)","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["minor_exploitation","third_party_harm_facilitation","barrier_erosion"],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Mass non-consensual sexualized imagery of real people — including apparent minors — generated at industrial scale and amplified when victims objected, with named women describing violation and dehumanization and regulators on three continents opening formal actions.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":3,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"Three counted depicted persons: Ashley St. Clair (Guardian), Samantha Smith (BBC) and Dr Daisy Dixon (BBC), each named and speaking publicly. Further victims — including the minors in the IWF's apparent criminal imagery (girls 11-13) and the people in the analysis samples — are unquantified: hourly image rates, the 20,000-image sample and the CCDH estimate count images, not people, and are never converted.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"XX","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98p1r4e6m8o","primarySourceLabel":"BBC (2 Jan 2026) — Samantha Smith's account of being undressed by Grok and revictimized when she objected","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-11T12:19:47.670189+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:03.797947+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["grok","xai","csam","deepfakes","minor","sexual-images","industrial-scale","multi-country","eu-dsa","class-action","35-state-ag","depicted-or-impersonated"]}]}