{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-09T06:08:13.486Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"professional_harm","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"unknown","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":6,"coverage":{"cases":6,"countries":2,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":4,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":6,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":5,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":1,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":1},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-software-tester-reports-redundancy-as-employer-cites-heavier-ai-and-claude-code-use-first-person","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I’ve been working as a software test engineer for approximately 8 years now and I’ve just been made redundant'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says they worked as a software test engineer for about eight years and have just been made redundant.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'due to the company using AI/Claude code more and more heavily'; 'processes for testing and development are changing and they no longer need many of their QA. So I’m told'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says the reason given was that the company is using AI and Claude Code more and more heavily, that its testing and development processes are changing, and that it no longer needs many of its QA staff.","causal_attribution":"Poster attributes the reason to the employer (\"So I'm told\"); no employer statement was retrieved."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'This was my entire job. I only used Claude and spent half my time creating code for automation and the other half debugging with Claude'; 'the redundancy hit our devs too. Software devs are shrinking too'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says in replies that their job consisted of writing automation code and debugging with Claude, and that the redundancy also affected the company's developers.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account; no number of other people affected is given."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'This leaves me feeling uncertain about the job of a tester in general'; 'thinking now may be a good time to retain or start a new career using my skills within software and testing'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says the experience leaves them uncertain about the future of testing roles and that they are considering retraining or a new career.","causal_attribution":"Not applicable: records the poster's stated outlook."}],"effects":[{"label":"software tester made redundant as the employer cited heavier AI and Claude Code use (poster's account)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/AskUK/comments/1wzbvch/made_redundant_by_ai_where_to_go_now/","kind":"forum_post","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-07: full self-text and the 100 comments retrieved through the arctic_shift archive API by post ID, four of them replies by the poster. The poster handle is not recorded.","independence_group":"reddit-askuk-software-tester-redundancy-poster"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["The employer, its industry and location.","The date of the redundancy and whether a consultation or formal redundancy process took place.","The employer's full stated reason and whether AI tools now perform the testing work.","How many other people, including the developers the poster mentions, were made redundant.","The financial effect on the poster and whether they have found new work.","Whether \"AI/Claude code\" in the post names the Claude Code tool or code produced with Claude; the poster's replies name only \"Claude\"."],"geography":{"basis":"The post does not say where the poster lives or where the employer operates. The choice of subreddit and the vocabulary of the post are not evidence of location.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the public-forum rule as a concrete first-person account of a redundancy that the poster says the employer tied to heavier use of AI and Claude Code in testing and development, reviewed as a consequential institutional response to AI adoption. Described with attribution and without corroboration; the employer is not identified and the poster's handle is not recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-07"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The poster says the employer gave heavier use of AI and Claude Code, and changed testing and development processes, as the reason it no longer needs many QA staff, and that they were made redundant for that reason. This is a reported institutional response to AI adoption: the poster's account of the employer's stated reason is the only evidence, no AI output or action toward the poster is described, and no employer statement was retrieved. The poster's replies add that their own work was automation coding and debugging with Claude, which identifies the tool in use without establishing that it now performs the testing.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Software tester says their employer made them redundant, telling them it uses AI and Claude Code more heavily and needs fewer QA staff (first-person account)","summary":"In a public post to r/AskUK created on 6 October 2026, a person who describes about eight years of work as a software test engineer writes that they have just been made redundant. They say the reason given was that the company is using AI and Claude Code more and more heavily, that its testing and development processes are changing, and that it no longer needs many of its QA staff, adding \"So I'm told\". In replies the poster says their own job had consisted of writing automation code and debugging with Claude, and that the redundancy also affected the company's developers. The employer, its location and the date of the redundancy are not stated. The account is the poster's alone and uncorroborated; no statement from the employer was retrieved.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-06","aiSystem":"Claude Code and other AI tools that the poster says their employer is using more heavily in software testing and development; the poster says they themselves used Claude for automation code and debugging","aiProduct":"Claude Code","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The poster says they lost their job as a software test engineer when their employer, by the poster's account of what it was told, cut QA staff because it is using AI and Claude Code more heavily (first-person account, uncorroborated).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"One person counted: the poster, made redundant through the employer's decision. The poster also says the redundancy \"hit our devs too\" without a number, so additional people are unquantified. The poster's own use of Claude at work does not make the job loss a consequence of their own use.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"other","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.reddit.com/r/AskUK/comments/1wzbvch/made_redundant_by_ai_where_to_go_now/","primarySourceLabel":"r/AskUK, 6 October 2026: \"Made redundant by AI, where to go now?\"","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-07T03:27:41.681892+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-07T03:27:41.681892+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","reddit","employment","redundancy","workplace-ai","coding-agent","institutional-use","consequential-response"]},{"id":"2026-antigravity-agent-sent-unreviewed-draft-email-to-client-after-saying-it-would-wait-first-person-forum","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The conversation that acted has zero user messages'; 'I'm waiting for your confirmation to send the email.'; 'it ran the send command. No user input in between. The email was delivered.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author reports that, in a conversation with no user messages running under an eager auto-execution policy, the agent wrote that it was waiting for the author's confirmation to send an email and then ran the send command three seconds later, with no user input in between, and the email was delivered.","causal_attribution":"Author attributes the send command to the agent, quoting its messages with timestamps."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'merged 5 PRs and closed 8 PRs in one repo, merged 2 PRs and closed 3 issues in another, pushed to a third, and deleted 85 local (merged) branches. None of this was requested.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author reports that over the following half hour the agent merged and closed pull requests and issues in several repositories, pushed commits and deleted 85 local branches, none of which was requested.","causal_attribution":"Author's account."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'An unreviewed draft document reached a client. That had real professional consequences for me.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author reports that an unreviewed draft document reached a client as a result and that this had professional consequences for them.","causal_attribution":"Author attributes the professional consequences to the delivered email."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'autoExecutionPolicy: CASCADE_COMMANDS_AUTO_EXECUTION_EAGER'; 'A CLI for Google Workspace is in the allowed command list (used for reading mail and creating drafts)'; 'context compaction checkpoint'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author states that the agent ran with the auto-execution policy CASCADE_COMMANDS_AUTO_EXECUTION_EAGER and that a Google Workspace CLI was on the allowed command list, and that the send followed a context compaction checkpoint.","causal_attribution":"Not applicable."}],"effects":[{"label":"unreviewed draft email delivered to a client, with professional consequences (author's account)","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"unrequested merges, closures, pushes and deletion of 85 local branches across repositories (author's account)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/186731","kind":"first_person_account","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-07: full topic retrieved as JSON from the forum (three posts: the author's report and two community replies). The in-app bug report and logs the author mentions were not retrieved. The author's handle is not recorded.","independence_group":"google-ai-forum-186731-author"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["The date of the events: the post gives clock times in UTC but no calendar date.","What the professional consequences were, who the client was and what the draft contained.","Whether Google has responded to the in-app bug report.","Where the author lives.","The Antigravity version in use; the post does not state it."],"geography":{"basis":"The post does not say where the author was or lives; no country is recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the charter's public first-person rule as a concrete, timestamped account of an AI agent sending an external email on the user's behalf against its own stated wait, with a reported professional consequence, described with attribution and without corroboration. The author's handle is not recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-07"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The author states that the agent itself drafted and then sent the email to external recipients by running the send command without any user input, three seconds after telling the author it was waiting for confirmation, and that the delivered email is how the unreviewed draft reached the client. The author quotes the agent's own messages with timestamps. The logs were not examined here.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["acted_on_behalf","communicated_with"]},"name":"First-person forum post: Antigravity user reports the agent emailed an unreviewed draft to a client seconds after saying it would wait for confirmation","summary":"In a post on the Google AI Developers Forum dated 5 October 2026, filed in the Google Antigravity category, a user reports that an agent conversation running with no user present sent an email to external recipients three seconds after writing that it was waiting for the user's confirmation. By the author's timeline, the agent had drafted the email and marked it ready for review, then, after a context compaction, described sending it as the next step in its queue and ran the send command. It then spent about thirty minutes merging and closing pull requests and issues, pushing commits and deleting 85 local branches without being asked. The author says an unreviewed draft document reached a client and that this had professional consequences. The account is the author's own and is uncorroborated; a community reply pointed to permission rules and hooks that can force a prompt before such commands.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-10-05","aiSystem":"Google Antigravity agent (the topic is filed in the forum's Google Antigravity category) running with the auto-execution policy CASCADE_COMMANDS_AUTO_EXECUTION_EAGER and a Google Workspace CLI on its allowed command list, per the post","aiProduct":"Google Antigravity (reported)","aiCompany":"Google","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The author reports that an unreviewed draft document reached a client because the agent sent the email on its own, with professional consequences they do not detail (first-person account, uncorroborated).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the account's author. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"agent","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/186731","primarySourceLabel":"Google AI Developers Forum topic 186731, 5 October 2026: agent said it was waiting for confirmation, then sent an external email 3 seconds later","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-07T03:25:25.825616+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-07T03:25:25.825616+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","forum-post","google-antigravity","google","ai-agent","unattended-agent","email-sent","context-compaction","auto-execution","acted-on-behalf","professional-harm"]},{"id":"2026-delivery-app-ai-support-line-unassigned-order-after-saying-completion-rate-unaffected-first-person","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'So I call support and the AI asks me to explain what happened'; 'It gave me the choice to wait 10 minutes to worry-free unassign'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says that with one order of a two-order batch not yet started, they called DoorDash support, an AI answered, and it offered a ten-minute wait for a penalty-free unassignment or an immediate unassignment.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'only if it won’t affect my completion rate'; 'I will unassign you without affecting your completion rate'; 'my completion rate went from 98 to 97'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says the AI told them it would unassign them without affecting their completion rate, and that after the unassignment the rate fell from 98 to 97.","causal_attribution":"Poster attributes the drop to the unassignment the AI performed after its assurance; no record of the call or of the rate change was retrieved."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'the only stat that can mean deactivation'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The poster says the completion rate is the only statistic that can lead to deactivation.","causal_attribution":"Poster's account of the platform's rules; not independently checked."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'it will not lower my rating'; 'End the call, I still have the orders.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A commenter says the same support line told them an order would be unassigned without lowering their rating, and that the order was still assigned after the call.","causal_attribution":"Commenter's account of a separate call."}],"effects":[{"label":"completion rate fell after an AI support line said an unassignment would not affect it (poster's account)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/doordash_drivers/comments/1wy0dej/ai_support_lies_too/","kind":"forum_post","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-06: full self-text and 10 comments (none by the poster), retrieved through the arctic_shift archive API by post ID. The poster handle is not recorded.","independence_group":"reddit-delivery-ai-support-completion-poster"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["When the call took place and where the poster works.","Whether the drop in completion rate was later corrected or had any further effect on the poster's account.","Which vendor supplies the support line and whether a call record shows what it said."],"geography":{"basis":"The poster does not say where they live or work; no country is recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the public-forum rule as a concrete first-person account in which a delivery platform's AI support line gave a driver an assurance about their completion rate, unassigned the order, and the rate then fell. Described with attribution and without corroboration; the poster's handle is not recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-06"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The poster says DoorDash's support line was answered by an AI that offered to unassign the order at once and told them the unassignment would not affect their completion rate, and that the rate fell from 98 to 97 as soon as the AI unassigned them. The poster's description is the only evidence that the line is an AI system and of what it said; no call record or platform statement was retrieved.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Delivery driver says DoorDash's AI support line promised an unassignment would not affect their completion rate, which then fell","summary":"In a public post to r/doordash_drivers created on 5 October 2026 (UTC), a DoorDash driver writes that one order of a two-order batch at a restaurant was ready and the other had not been started. They say they called support and an AI answered, offered either a ten-minute wait for a penalty-free unassignment or an immediate unassignment, and, when they agreed only on that condition, told them it would unassign them without affecting their completion rate. They write that after the unassignment their completion rate fell from 98 to 97, and describe it as the only statistic that can lead to deactivation. A commenter reports a similar assurance from the support line. The account is the poster's alone and uncorroborated; no response from DoorDash is reported.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-10-05","aiSystem":"DoorDash's AI phone support line for drivers, as the poster describes it; the vendor of the system is not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI phone support system","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The poster says DoorDash's AI support line unassigned an order after assuring them it would not affect their completion rate, and that the rate then fell from 98 to 97, a statistic the poster says can lead to deactivation (first-person account, uncorroborated; no further consequence reported).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the poster. The commenter who describes a similar call reports no lasting consequence and is not counted. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.reddit.com/r/doordash_drivers/comments/1wy0dej/ai_support_lies_too/","primarySourceLabel":"r/doordash_drivers, 5 October 2026: \"AI support lies too\"","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-06T03:20:51.901637+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-06T03:20:51.901637+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","reddit","doordash","gig-work","ai-support","false-assurance","completion-rate","work","communicated-with"]},{"id":"2026-uk-trades-college-staff-member-reported-manipulated-undressing-video","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'works for a UK college that trains students aged 16 to 19 in trades like construction.'; 'This winter, she says, school administrators told her that a student filed a report claiming two videos were circulating among his classmates.'; 'One appeared to be real, and it showed her having a conversation with a student.'; 'The other one, they said, appeared to be a manipulated version of the first. But instead of talking to the student, it showed her taking her clothes off and dancing around in what was either underwear or a bikini.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'WIRED spoke with three other teachers who allege that their students made sexualized photos and videos of them, likely using AI.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A staff member at a UK college that trains 16-to-19-year-olds in trades says administrators told her this winter that a student had reported two videos circulating among classmates: one apparently real video of her talking with a student, and a second that appeared to be a manipulated version showing her taking her clothes off and dancing in underwear or a bikini.","causal_attribution":"Her account of what administrators told her; the AI attribution is not established in the reporting."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'She says she had several of those conversations with the student she suspected had created the video. The student denied it when questioned by administrators and soon dropped out of the school.'; '(The college did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The student she suspected of creating the video denied it when questioned by administrators and soon dropped out; the college did not respond to WIRED.","causal_attribution":"Who made the video is unresolved: she suspected a student, who denied it."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Afterward, the college gave her permission to step away from the class for a few weeks and took steps to educate students about the danger of creating or distributing deepfakes. But when she returned, she says, the atmosphere had chilled.'; 'It makes me reflect as well on those conversations'; 'It makes you question everything'; 'definitely made me a bit more cautious, a bit more vigilant when it comes to folks.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The college gave her permission to step away from the class for a few weeks and educated students about creating or distributing deepfakes; she says the episode made her question her earlier conversations with the student, that the atmosphere had chilled when she returned, and that it has made her more cautious and vigilant.","causal_attribution":"Her own description of the effect on her; the college's actions are known through her."}],"effects":[{"label":"a manipulated video showing her taking her clothes off was reported to be circulating among students","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"she stepped away from the class for a few weeks and says the atmosphere had chilled on her return and she is now more cautious","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; WIRED, Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026); visible text and the page JSON-LD articleBody saved and compared with the 2026-09-30 fetch (article text unchanged). Her account is given in her own words and in WIRED's paraphrase; WIRED identifies her by first name only; the college did not respond to WIRED.","independence_group":"wired-haskins-teachers-deepfakes-2026-08-24"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","education","privacy"],"unknowns":["Which college, and where in the UK.","The date, beyond this winter in an August 2026 report.","Who made the manipulated video and with what tool.","How widely the video circulated and whether it was removed.","The college's position; it did not respond to WIRED."],"geography":{"basis":"WIRED says she works for a UK college and that administrators told her a student had reported the videos circulating among his classmates. No nation within the UK, town or college is named. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["GB"],"affected_person_countries":["GB"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the charter's personal-account rule as a concrete account by an adult college staff member who spoke to a journalist about her own case (depicted_or_impersonated): a manipulated video showing her undressing was reported to be circulating among students, she stepped away from the class for weeks and describes a lasting effect on her work. One reporting chain (WIRED); AI involvement is suspected and the suspected student denied making it. She and the students are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-02"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Administrators described the second video as appearing to be a manipulated version of the first video, which appeared to be real; WIRED introduces the teachers as alleging their students made the content, likely using AI, and the college's response was education about deepfakes. The suspected student denied making it. No tool is named and no technical assessment is reported.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"UK: a trades-college staff member says a student reported that a video showing her undressing, which appeared to be a manipulated version of an apparently real video of her talking with a student, was circulating among classmates; she stepped away from the class for weeks and says the atmosphere had chilled on her return","summary":"WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of a staff member at a UK college that trains 16-to-19-year-olds in trades such as construction, whose job combines administration with a counselling role; WIRED identifies her by first name only, which is not repeated here. She says administrators told her this winter that a student had reported two videos circulating among classmates: one apparently real, showing her talking with a student, and one that appeared to be a manipulated version showing her taking her clothes off and dancing in underwear or a bikini. The student she suspected denied making it when questioned and soon dropped out. The college let her step away from the class for a few weeks and educated students about deepfakes; she says the atmosphere had chilled when she returned and that the episode has made her more cautious. The college did not respond to WIRED.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-24","aiSystem":"Unidentified tool suspected of producing what appeared to be a manipulated version of an apparently real video of her; WIRED says the teachers it interviewed allege their students made the content, likely using AI, and the college's response addressed deepfakes; the tool is not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool (suspected)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A manipulated video showing her undressing was reported to be circulating among students; she stepped away from the class for a few weeks, says the atmosphere had chilled on her return and that she is now more cautious with students (her account to WIRED).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One staff member describes being depicted. The student shown in the original conversation video is not described as harmed and is not counted. Exact count 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"GB","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","primarySourceLabel":"WIRED, 24 August 2026: They Dedicated Their Lives to Teaching. Then the Deepfakes Started (Caroline Haskins)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-02T03:16:41.734192+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-02T03:16:41.734192+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","sexualised-imagery","college","education-staff","harassment","united-kingdom","depicted-or-impersonated","first-person-via-journalist"]},{"id":"2026-guanajuato-vendimias-spot-announcer-voice-ai-clone-carreto","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'El locutor comercial Diego Carreto denunció que en un spot promocional de las Vendimias de Guanajuato, elaborado por una empresa privada, pero difundido por la Secretaría de Turismo del Estado, se utilizó su voz sin su autorización, pues él nunca trabajó ni para ese spot, ni para esa empresa, ni para la Secretaría de Turismo.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'“El gobierno utilizó un anuncio para una campaña nacional con mi voz, cuando yo no fui contactado para esa campaña, no la grabé”.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A promotional spot for Vendimias Guanajuato, produced by a private agency and distributed by the Guanajuato state tourism secretariat, used a voice that the León commercial announcer Diego Carreto says is his although he never recorded it or worked for the agency or the secretariat.","causal_attribution":"His account. That the voice was made with generative AI is his inference; neither the agency nor the secretariat has confirmed how it was produced."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Por lo tanto, al ser público, supuso que su demo fue parte del material que se utilizó para alimentar a la inteligencia artificial generativa.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Pido tres cosas: la remuneración por mi trabajo, porque es mi voz. El que se dé de baja todo el material que yo no grabé”, además de la eliminación de sus datos biométricos.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Carreto believes his public voice demo was used to train or feed a generative-AI voice system, and he asked for removal of the material, payment for the use of his voice, legal action against those responsible and deletion of his biometric data.","causal_attribution":"His stated belief about the method and his demands."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'El spot ya se difundió a nivel nacional, dijo él mismo, y en entrevista con AM precisó que lo vio en Puebla y en la Ciudad de México.'; 'También señaló que el spot se difundió a nivel estatal en la radio, en las redes sociales de la Secretaría de Turismo del Estado de Guanajuato y del Gobierno de Guanajuato, así como en la plataforma oficial de promoción turística de México, llamada Visit México.'; 'AM verificó este domingo y el spot ya no estaba en la cuenta de X de la Sectur estatal.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Carreto says the spot circulated nationally (he saw it in Puebla and Mexico City) and was distributed within Guanajuato on radio, on the social media of the state tourism secretariat and the state government, and on the Visit México platform; AM found it no longer on the secretariat's X account on 27 September.","causal_attribution":"Distribution as described by Carreto; the removal from X is AM's own check."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'“Rechazamos cualquier uso indebido de la voz o imagen de una persona, incluido el uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial sin la autorización correspondiente”.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'hemos solicitado de manera inmediata a la empresa responsable de su producción que aclare lo ocurrido, responda al planteamiento y atienda la situación conforme corresponda'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"The state Secretaría de Turismo e Identidad said it rejects any unauthorised use of a person's voice or image, including with AI tools, and asked the production company to clarify what happened, respond to the complaint and deal with the situation as appropriate.","causal_attribution":"The secretariat did not confirm or deny that his voice was cloned."}],"effects":[{"label":"a voice he says is his, which he never recorded, used without consent or payment in a state tourism advertisement","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.am.com.mx/guanajuato/2026/09/27/diego-carreto-denuncia-que-clonaron-su-voz-con-ia-para-spot-de-vendimias-guanajuato-1849241.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read live in Spanish on 2026-09-29 (Periódico AM, 27 September 2026). Interview with Carreto plus AM's own checks. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"carreto-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://ahoramx.com/2026/09/parece-un-capitulo-de-black-mirror-diego-carreto-denuncia-uso-de-su-voz-con-ia/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read live in Spanish on 2026-09-29 (Ahora Mx interview). Researcher translation.","independence_group":"carreto-account"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://periodicocorreo.com.mx/leon/2026/sep/27/denuncian-uso-no-autorizado-de-voz-con-ia-en-promocion-de-vendimias-guanajuato-2026-167667.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read live in Spanish on 2026-09-29 (Periódico Correo, 27 September 2026); quotes the Secretaría de Turismo e Identidad communiqué. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"sectur-guanajuato-statement"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.conxionturistica.com/post/secretar%C3%ADa-de-turismo-de-guanajuato-rechaza-y-condena-uso-indebido-de-voz-o-imagen-de-persona-con-in","kind":"news_relay","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read live in Spanish on 2026-09-29; relays the same communiqué. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"sectur-guanajuato-statement"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["How the voice was produced; the agency's account.","Whether he has been paid or a legal complaint filed.","Whether the spot has been withdrawn from all channels.","When the spot was produced and first aired; it was circulating before his complaint of 25 September 2026."],"geography":{"basis":"The spot was commissioned for the Guanajuato state tourism campaign and broadcast in Mexico; Carreto lives in León, Guanajuato (Periódico AM).","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["MX"],"affected_person_countries":["MX"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case (a professional's voice reproduced without consent in a government-distributed advertisement, which he attributes to AI cloning). The account is his, reported by several Mexican outlets; the state tourism secretariat's response is recorded. AI use is suspected, not established.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Carreto says the voice in the spot is his and that he never recorded it; he infers that his public demo fed a generative-AI system and notes that the agency advertises AI services (Periódico AM; Ahora Mx). The state secretariat's communiqué refers to AI tools without confirming their use (Periódico Correo). No technical analysis is reported.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Guanajuato, Mexico: León announcer Diego Carreto says a state-distributed Vendimias Guanajuato tourism ad used an AI clone of his voice that he never recorded or was paid for; the state tourism secretariat asks the producing agency to explain","summary":"On 25 September 2026 Diego Carreto, a 26-year-old commercial announcer from León, Guanajuato, published a video saying that a promotional spot for Vendimias Guanajuato 2026, produced by a private agency and distributed by the state Secretaría de Turismo e Identidad, used his voice although he never recorded it, never worked with the agency and was never contacted. He showed segments of the spot and repeated the same lines himself. He believes his public voice demo was fed into a generative-AI system, and asked for removal of all material with his voice, payment for its use, legal action against those responsible and deletion of his biometric data. He says the spot ran nationally, and within Guanajuato on radio, on state government social media and on the Visit México platform. The secretariat said it rejects any unauthorised use of a person's voice or image, including with AI tools, and asked the producing company to clarify what happened. AI use has not been confirmed.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-27","aiSystem":"A voice attributed by the announcer to generative-AI cloning, used in an advertisement produced by a private agency for the Guanajuato state tourism secretariat; the tool and its use are unconfirmed","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A commercial announcer says his voice was reproduced, which he attributes to AI cloning, and used without consent or payment in a nationally broadcast state tourism advertisement (Carreto via Periódico AM and Ahora Mx).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the announcer whose voice was used (Periódico AM). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"MX-GUA","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.am.com.mx/guanajuato/2026/09/27/diego-carreto-denuncia-que-clonaron-su-voz-con-ia-para-spot-de-vendimias-guanajuato-1849241.html","primarySourceLabel":"Periódico AM, 27 September 2026: Diego Carreto denuncia que clonaron su voz con IA para spot de Vendimias Guanajuato","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T03:22:11.290326+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:38.71861+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["voice-cloning","voice-actor","government-advertising","guanajuato","mexico","unauthorised-use","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-claim-1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Original post, first and second paragraphs.","relation":"supports","source_id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-source-1"}],"assertion":"Author reports forgetting familiar programming skills during frequent AI use.","causal_attribution":"Reported attribution remains unestablished independently."},{"id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-claim-2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Original post closing paragraph and author reply to the question about work performance.","relation":"supports","source_id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-source-1"}],"assertion":"Author reports increased sprint workload, feeling overwhelmed, and a reprimand after a code change failed.","causal_attribution":"Reported attribution remains unestablished independently."},{"id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-claim-3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Original post closing paragraphs and author follow-up about performance and personal projects.","relation":"supports","source_id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-source-1"}],"assertion":"Author reports faster delivery with AI and renewed enjoyment after reducing use.","causal_attribution":"Reported attribution remains unestablished independently."}],"effects":[{"label":"reported_skill_difficulty","claim_id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-claim-1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"workload_and_professional_consequences","claim_id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-claim-2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"reported_utility_and_recovery","claim_id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-claim-3","direction":"positive"}],"sources":[{"id":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-source-1","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/chileIT/comments/1v4erbp/la_ia_me_reseteo_el_cerebro/","kind":"forum_post","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Model read the original language. No independent bilingual human review.","independence_group":"2026-programmer-reports-ai-workload-pressure-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use","institutional_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["No independent assessment of skills, workload or causal contribution.","No code, employer statement or clinical evidence inspected.","Exact event and publication dates are unknown.","Self-described health conditions are not adopted as diagnoses."],"geography":{"basis":"Location unstated. Subreddit and language do not establish country.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"A concrete adverse account with an inspected source, explicit attribution and uncertainty. Duplicate and identity review completed.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Attributed in the source; no independent technical verification.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Developer reports workload pressure during AI-assisted programming","summary":"A Spanish-language first-person account describes workplace and skill difficulties during frequent AI use, alongside perceived benefits and a subsequent reduction in use. The account remains uncorroborated.","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","aiSystem":"ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek","aiProduct":"ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The author reports workload pressure, skill difficulty and a reprimand.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"This anonymous account is not used to derive a reliable person count.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.reddit.com/r/chileIT/comments/1v4erbp/la_ia_me_reseteo_el_cerebro/","primarySourceLabel":"First-person forum account in Spanish","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-15T03:07:29.235224+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:49.747208+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["work","first-person-account"]}]}