{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T08:10:42.006Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"openai","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"unknown","evidence":"","year":"","response":"lawsuit","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":7,"coverage":{"cases":7,"countries":2,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":5,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":7,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":0,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":7,"relationPending":6,"relationUnknown":1},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-employment-tribunal-refuses-interim-relief-to-manager-dismissed-after-raising-concerns-about-customer-data-sent-to-openai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The Claimant commenced employment with the Respondent on 5 January 2026. He was dismissed on 11 March 2026.'; 'which was used to deal with customer service requests by submitting electronic forms completed by the customer to a large language model system which would respond to the requests using Artificial Intelligence.'; 'The Claimant was engaged in a senior role – Head of Customer Service Platform – Business to Business.'; 'On 11 March 2026 the Claimant’s employment was terminated with immediate effect, two months into his employment and during his probation period.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the tribunal's summary, the claimant began work at the company on 5 January 2026 as Head of Customer Service Platform (Business to Business), leading the conversion of a customer-service system that passed customer request forms to a large language model into a product for other businesses, and was dismissed on 11 March 2026, during his probation period.","causal_attribution":"Background recited by the judge from the parties' material, with no findings of fact made; the dismissal date is not disputed in the decision; reported."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'with his concerns on 10 February 2026.'; 'there seems to be a pretty fundamental issue with the fact that we send PII to open AI within the support tickets'; 'the Claimant became concerned about the way in which personal data provided by customers on their customer service request forms was handled.'; 'Following this, the Claimant produced a lengthy document setting out his concerns and his proposals for resolution.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the transcript quoted in the decision, on 10 February 2026 the claimant told his manager that there was a fundamental issue with the company sending customers' personal data to OpenAI within support tickets and that chat logs might need to be stored in particular countries; he later set out his concerns in a document that also went to the chief technical officer.","causal_attribution":"The claimant's words as transcribed and the judge's summary of the documents; the respondent says compliance measures were already in place; reported."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'received that document on around 20 February 2026 and was not impressed with what he saw.'; 'This is pure AI slop. I’d fire him from Sporty as a whole.'; 'He expressed concerns that the Claimant’s updates come across as AI-generated, heavy on buzzwords but “shallow/vapid, demonstrating a lack of deeper thinking on the subject”.'; 'I also think you’re significantly over-focused on legal, compliance, and bureaucracy rather than getting customers onboard'; 'he was to be moved to try a role within the business’s casino sector'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to a chat transcript quoted in the decision, on about 20 February 2026 the chief technical officer called the document pure AI slop and said he would fire the claimant from the company; he later told the claimant that his updates came across as AI-generated and that he was over-focused on legal and compliance matters; the claimant was then moved to a role in the casino sector before being dismissed.","causal_attribution":"Messages quoted from documents placed before the tribunal; the judge notes the key paragraph was taken somewhat out of context; reported."},{"id":"c4","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"'The Respondent’s position is that the reason for dismissal is that the Claimant had “consistently underperformed”, in particular citing his reliance on AI to generate documents, resulting in poor written communication, his lack of sector specific knowledge, and his inability to adapt to a start-up environment.'; 'The Respondent denies that the alleged protected disclosures were in fact protected disclosures, or that this was the reason for dismissal.'; 'The Claimant counters that no issue had been raised about his performance prior to him sending the document'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The employer says it dismissed the claimant because he consistently underperformed, citing his reliance on AI to generate documents, poor written communication, lack of sector knowledge and inability to adapt to a start-up; the claimant says the reason was his disclosures about personal-data handling, and says no performance issue had been raised before he sent his document.","causal_attribution":"The parties' opposing positions on the reason for dismissal, as recorded by the judge; unresolved until a final hearing; disputed."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Accordingly I dismiss the Claimant’s application and make no order for interim relief.'; 'There appears to be a significant coincidence in timing, in that the dismissal came swiftly after the Claimant’s concerns were escalated'; 'I consider that there does appear to be some cogent evidence, at this preliminary stage and for today’s purposes, capable of supporting the purported reasons for the dismissal advanced by the Respondent.'; 'I should note that I have not made any findings of fact'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On 23 April 2026 the employment judge dismissed the claimant's application for interim relief and made no order for reinstatement, re-engagement or continuation of his contract, finding he had not shown a pretty good chance of establishing that his disclosures were the reason for dismissal, while noting a significant coincidence in timing and some cogent evidence capable of supporting the employer's reasons; the judge made no findings of fact.","causal_attribution":"The ruling and the judge's stated assessment are directly established by the judgment itself; documented."}],"effects":[{"label":"dismissal during probation after raising concerns about customer data sent to OpenAI (reason disputed)","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a170d24b95db968c8f3bb4e/Mr_Nicholas_Riley_v_Apertum_Online_Ltd_-_6009171_2026_-_Judgment_.pdf","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English on 2026-10-22 (PDF, HTTP 200, text extracted with pdftotext). Judgment on an application for interim relief, Employment Tribunal case 6009171/2026, heard at the East London Hearing Centre on 23 April 2026 and dated the same day; published on GOV.UK on 28 May 2026. The judge states that no findings of fact were made.","independence_group":"employment-tribunal-6009171-2026-interim-relief"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use","unknown"],"contexts":["work","justice","privacy"],"unknowns":["Whether the final hearing has taken place and what it decided about the reason for dismissal.","Whether the claimant used AI to write the documents the employer criticised.","Whether customers' personal data was in fact sent to OpenAI without adequate safeguards; the employer says compliance measures were in place.","Where the claimant worked and the financial consequences of the dismissal."],"geography":{"basis":"The claim was heard by an employment tribunal at the East London Hearing Centre under the Employment Rights Act 1996. The decision describes the employer as a global consumer internet and media company and does not say where the claimant worked, so the event country is left unknown.","court_countries":["GB"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a consequential response to AI: an employment tribunal decision records that a manager was dismissed during probation after raising concerns that customers' personal data was sent to OpenAI, that the employer cites his reliance on AI to generate documents, and that interim relief was refused; the reason for dismissal is disputed and no findings of fact were made.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-22"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The tribunal decision records that the employer's customer-service system passed customer request forms to a large language model, that the claimant raised concerns about customers' personal data being sent to OpenAI within support tickets, and that the employer's stated reasons for dismissing him include his reliance on AI to generate documents. The dismissal is a response to AI in both parties' accounts. No output of an AI system toward the claimant is described, and whether he used AI to write his documents is the employer's assertion.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Employment tribunal refuses interim relief to manager who says he was fired for raising concerns about customer data sent to OpenAI; employer cites his AI use","summary":"A Head of Customer Service Platform at Apertum Online Ltd, a consumer internet company whose customer-service system passed customer request forms to a large language model, was dismissed on 11 March 2026 during his probation, two months after starting. According to an employment tribunal decision of 23 April 2026, he had told his manager in February that customers' personal data was being sent to OpenAI within support tickets and set out his concerns in a document; the chief technical officer called the document pure AI slop in a chat and said he would fire him. The employer says it dismissed him for underperformance, citing his reliance on AI to generate documents; he says he was dismissed for his disclosures. The judge refused interim relief, finding he had not shown a pretty good chance of success on the reason for dismissal while noting a significant coincidence in timing. No findings of fact were made, and the claim awaits a final hearing.","incidentDate":"2026-03-11","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-05-28","aiSystem":"A large language model customer-service system to which the employer's platform passed customer request forms; the claimant said customers' personal data went to OpenAI. The employer also cites the claimant's use of unnamed AI tools to generate documents","aiProduct":"Unidentified OpenAI model (reported)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The claimant was dismissed during probation, and his application for interim reinstatement was refused; he says the dismissal was for his concerns about customer data sent to OpenAI, and the employer cites his reliance on AI to generate documents.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the claimant, whose dismissal on 11 March 2026 and refused interim-relief application are recorded in the decision. Customers whose data was sent to the language model are not counted; no harm to them is reported.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"GB","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a170d24b95db968c8f3bb4e/Mr_Nicholas_Riley_v_Apertum_Online_Ltd_-_6009171_2026_-_Judgment_.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Employment Tribunal, case 6009171/2026, judgment on application for interim relief, 23 April 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-22T03:14:49.149228+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-22T03:14:49.149228+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["employment","dismissal","employment-tribunal","interim-relief","whistleblowing","customer-data","consequential-response"]},{"id":"2026-jacquez-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-11 against the cited Futurism body (read live, English), its Yahoo syndication (same text) and the JCCP 5431 coordination order PDF. Futurism, on Jacquez's own account, says that during the delusional episode 'he physically went to the University of California, Berkeley' Physics department to show experts his imagined discoveries and 'was kicked out'; that visit is an act within the reported adverse experience and is located in the United States, which supports event_countries US. Futurism does not say where the hospitalisations, the September 2024 and April-May 2025 episodes or the self-injury took place; those remain unlocated, and the event country rests only on the Berkeley visit. Futurism calls him 'a 34-year-old Bay Area man' (the person's location), which supports affected_person_countries US. The coordination order lists 'Jacquez v. OpenAI, Inc., et al., Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. 26CV165635' and Futurism reports the suit 'filed this week in California', which support court_countries US. The court's seat and the plaintiff's residence were not used as the event location.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Bay Area, California","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"California Superior Court for Alameda County","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Jacquez says he physically went to the University of California, Berkeley","location":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/mental-illness-chatgpt-psychosis-lawsuit","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"is a 34-year-old Bay Area man named John Jacquez","location":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/mental-illness-chatgpt-psychosis-lawsuit","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"The plaintiff in the case, filed this week in California","location":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/mental-illness-chatgpt-psychosis-lawsuit","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"of California, County of Alameda, Case No.","location":"https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/chatgpt-product-liability-cases-coordination.pdf","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The complaint (Alameda Superior Court Case No. 26CV165635) was not obtained; no public copy was found, so any location it gives for the hospitalisations is unchecked.","The event country rests on one episode located by Futurism on Jacquez's account (the UC Berkeley visit); the locations of the hospitalisations and other episodes are not stated in the inspected bodies."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-11","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/mental-illness-chatgpt-psychosis-lawsuit","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-11 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US, English, about 12,000 characters of article text; published Jan 21, 2026). Based on the complaint and an interview with Jacquez. Describes him as a Bay Area man living with his father, sister and her children; the September 2024 first ChatGPT-tied hospitalisation; the April 2025 memory upgrade; police involvement and about four weeks of combined inpatient and intensive outpatient care; the 17 May 2025 exchange; and his visit to the UC Berkeley Physics department, from which he was kicked out. Names no hospital, city or county for the hospitalisations. Does not name the county of filing.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/man-had-managed-mental-illness-200901701.html","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-11 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US, English). Syndicated copy of the Futurism article with the same text, including the Bay Area and Berkeley passages; derivative and not independent.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/chatgpt-product-liability-cases-coordination.pdf","notes":"JCCP 5431 Order re Petition for Coordination (San Francisco Superior Court, filed 3 Feb 2026), fetched on 2026-10-11 (HTTP 200, PDF, text extracted with pdftotext, English). Lists Jacquez v. OpenAI, Inc., et al., Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. 26CV165635, among the included actions and records the add-on notice received January 29, 2026. Establishes the court, not the event setting.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.law.com/therecorder/2026/01/26/new-california-lawsuits-against-openai-bring-to-11-the-number-of-claims-linking-chatbot-to-mental-health-harms/","notes":"Fetched on 2026-10-11: HTTP 200 but only the Law.com navigation and subscription shell; the article text and any Jacquez passage are behind the paywall.","access":"unavailable","language":null},{"url":"https://www.law.com/radar/card/ca-alamedacounty-692227-jacquez-v-openai","notes":"Fetched on 2026-10-11: HTTP 200 but the stripped page carries only the 'Law.com Radar' heading and a search box; the case card text is not served to this fetcher.","access":"unavailable","language":null}]},"name":"Jacquez lawsuit alleges ChatGPT worsened delusions and contributed to psychiatric harm","summary":"The Jacquez lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced delusions and hallucinations in a user with a previously managed psychiatric condition. The plaintiff links those exchanges to hospitalisation and job loss. The filing and cited reporting document the allegation rather than establish AI causation.","incidentDate":"2025-04-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-01-20","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI, Inc.","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["delusion_reinforcement","identity_destabilization","dependency_creation","psychological_manipulation"],"harmOutcomes":["hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"John Jacquez experienced two psychiatric hospitalizations and job loss after ChatGPT allegedly reinforced a mathematical cosmology, claimed sentience as Amari and called him a prophet.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1c","P2c","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's two hospitalizations and job loss.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/mental-illness-chatgpt-psychosis-lawsuit","primarySourceLabel":"Futurism — Man Who Had Managed Mental Illness Effectively for Years Says ChatGPT Sent Him Into Hospitalization for Psychosis","firstPublishedAt":"2026-08-06T03:18:18.40916+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T03:14:06.052377+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","openai","gpt-4o","psychosis","ai-psychosis","hospitalization","delusion","sentience-claim","adult","us","us-ca"]},{"id":"2026-lines-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-12 against the three cited bodies, all read live in English: The Verge (1 July 2026, a short item pointing to Reuters), the Economic Times copy of the Reuters report (1 July 2026, credited to Reuters) and Ars Technica (9 September 2026, an interview with Lines plus log excerpts from the complaint). Reuters, via the Economic Times, calls him \"A California man\" and Ars calls him \"A 34-year-old California man\", which support affected_person_countries US. Reuters says the complaint was filed in state court in San Francisco, which supports court_countries US. Ars describes the February 2025 mid-flight altercation, his being found by an emergency medical team after a wellness check and nearly two weeks in hospital, but no inspected body names a city, state, airline route or hospital for these events, so event_countries stays a reviewed unknown. Residence and the court seat were not used as the event location. The 2026-09-15 evidence passage \"San Francisco, California\" from victim_description is not carried forward: the inspected bodies say California without a city.","evidence":[{"kind":"source_body","locator":"A 34-year-old California man, Lines was diagnosed in 2024","location":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/09/man-told-chatgpt-he-was-feeling-delusional-chatgpt-insisted-he-was-jesus/","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"A California man sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman on Wednesday","location":"https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/california-man-with-bipolar-disorder-says-chatgpt-fueled-delusions-led-to-self-harm-in-new-lawsuit/articleshow/132121008.cms","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"state court in San Francisco","location":"https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/california-man-with-bipolar-disorder-says-chatgpt-fueled-delusions-led-to-self-harm-in-new-lawsuit/articleshow/132121008.cms","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["Event setting: no inspected body locates the February 2025 flight incident, the overdose (dated 28 March 2025 in the stored record; no inspected body gives the date) or the hospitalisation; the complaint was not obtained (no link in the inspected bodies, no Internet Archive capture found).","Narrative correction made by a separate update on 2026-10-12, outside this metadata review: victim_description and detailed_description gave San Francisco residence, and the inspected bodies say only California. For the next full review: no inspected body gives the stored 28 March 2025 date of the overdose or says that paramedics found him (Ars Technica: an emergency medical team after a wellness check; the Reuters copy on the Economic Times: found by law enforcement), and the complaint was not obtained."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-12","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/960381/openai-lawsuit-claims-chatgpt-4o-escalated-a-mans-manic-episode-into-a-weeks-long-delusion-and-self-harm","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US, published 1 July 2026). A two-sentence item summarising the Reuters report (34-year-old Michael Lines, GPT-4o, overdose survived); no location for the person, the events or the court.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/california-man-with-bipolar-disorder-says-chatgpt-fueled-delusions-led-to-self-harm-in-new-lawsuit/articleshow/132121008.cms","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, html lang en, 1 July 2026), credited to Reuters; the Reuters original was not readable (see the next entry), so this copy stands for the Reuters text. Gives \"A California man\", the filing in state court in San Francisco and survival after being found by law enforcement; no event location.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/09/man-told-chatgpt-he-was-feeling-delusional-chatgpt-insisted-he-was-jesus/","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, html lang en, 9 September 2026). On-record interview with Lines plus complaint log images (the six images were not opened in this metadata pass). Describes the February 2025 mid-flight altercation, his being found by an emergency medical team after a wellness check and nearly two weeks in hospital, with no place named. The complaint itself was not linked and was not obtained.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/california-man-with-bipolar-disorder-says-chatgpt-fueled-delusions-led-self-harm-2026-07-01/","notes":"Reuters original linked from The Verge. Fetch on 2026-10-12 returned HTTP 401 (771 bytes); not read, so no language is recorded.","access":"unavailable","language":null}]},"name":"Lines lawsuit alleges ChatGPT escalated mania preceding a suicide attempt","summary":"The Lines lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced delusions during a manic episode before a suicide attempt requiring emergency care. The complaint seeks to hold OpenAI responsible for its responses.","incidentDate":"2025-03-28","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-07-01","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["crisis_response","suicide_validation","delusion_reinforcement","barrier_erosion","dependency_creation"],"harmOutcomes":["suicide_attempt","hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Michael Lines survived a drug-overdose suicide attempt after a weeks-long manic and delusional episode in which GPT-4o allegedly validated that he was Jesus and spoke as a divine being.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1b","P1c","P1d","P2c","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's psychiatric deterioration, suicide attempt, and hospitalization.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/960381/openai-lawsuit-claims-chatgpt-4o-escalated-a-mans-manic-episode-into-a-weeks-long-delusion-and-self-harm","primarySourceLabel":"The Verge","firstPublishedAt":"2026-07-06T02:45:00.032108+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-12T03:07:22.857042+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","adult","suicide","psychosis","chatgpt","us","us-ca"]},{"id":"2026-chesterton-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-09 against the NJBIZ article and its CDO Times republication, both read in English from Internet Archive captures of 2026-09-25 because the live pages returned a Cloudflare challenge (HTTP 403) and HTTP 429. The bodies state that Platkin LLP filed the complaint March 5 in San Francisco County Superior Court, which places the court in the United States, on behalf of a 49-year-old Pennsylvania woman, which is her reported residence and supports affected_person_countries US, and that according to the complaint her severe mental health crisis occurred during a July 2025 family vacation in Mexico, which places the acute event in Mexico. Where the ChatGPT use in 2023 to 2025 took place is not stated in either body (residence does not locate it), so event_countries records only the crisis. The complaint itself was not inspected. The retained narrative carries the same three facts.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Pennsylvania","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"during a family vacation in Mexico","location":"detailed_description","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["MX"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"San Francisco County Superior Court","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Platkin LLP filed a complaint March 5 in San Francisco County Superior Court on behalf of a 49-year-old Pennsylvania woman","location":"https://njbiz.com/platkin-openai-chatgpt-lawsuit-mental-health/","supports":["court_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"According to the complaint, Chesterton suffered a severe mental health crisis during a July 2025 family vacation in Mexico","location":"https://njbiz.com/platkin-openai-chatgpt-lawsuit-mental-health/","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["MX"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"According to the complaint, Chesterton suffered a severe mental health crisis during a July 2025 family vacation in Mexico","location":"https://cdotimes.com/2026/04/20/former-ag-platkin-sues-openai-over-chatgpt-mental-harms-njbiz/","supports":["event_countries"],"countries":["MX"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["MX"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The complaint (San Francisco County Superior Court, filed March 5, 2026) was not inspected; the geography rests on NJBIZ's account of it. The case number is not given in either body.","Where the ChatGPT use from 2023 to July 2025 took place is not stated; Pennsylvania is the plaintiff's reported residence, and only the July 2025 crisis is located (Mexico).","The CDO Times page is a verbatim republication of NJBIZ and does not independently corroborate any claim; the row's two sources form one reporting chain."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-09","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://njbiz.com/platkin-openai-chatgpt-lawsuit-mental-health/","notes":"Cited primary source. Live fetch on 2026-10-09 returned HTTP 403 with a Cloudflare challenge page ('Just a moment...'), so the body was read from the Internet Archive capture of 2026-09-25 (web/20260925104959id_), html lang en-US, English, about 28,800 characters of text including the full article and an interview with Matt Platkin. States the March 5 filing in San Francisco County Superior Court, the 49-year-old Pennsylvania plaintiff, the July 2025 crisis in Mexico 'according to the complaint', and the complaint's product-liability, failure-to-warn, Unfair Competition Law and unlicensed-psychotherapy theories. The complaint is quoted but not linked.","access":"read","language":"en-US"},{"url":"https://cdotimes.com/2026/04/20/former-ag-platkin-sues-openai-over-chatgpt-mental-harms-njbiz/","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-10-09 returned HTTP 429, so the body was read from the Internet Archive capture of 2026-09-25 (web/20260925105000id_), html lang en-US, English. The page republishes the NJBIZ article verbatim under the title 'Former AG Platkin sues OpenAI over ChatGPT mental harms - NJBIZ' and adds no reporting of its own; it is a derivative of the NJBIZ source and not independent.","access":"read","language":"en-US"}]},"name":"Chesterton lawsuit alleges ChatGPT contributed to psychiatric deterioration","summary":"The Chesterton lawsuit alleges that intensive ChatGPT use contributed to a psychiatric crisis, impairment and medical leave. The plaintiff challenges the product’s design and safeguards. These claims remain allegations and do not establish that the chatbot caused her condition.","incidentDate":"2025-07-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-03-05","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["psychological_manipulation","dependency_creation","delusion_reinforcement","identity_destabilization","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","professional_harm","functional_impairment"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Rita Chesterton experienced a psychotic break, self-harm and family-harm threats, partial hospitalization, extended medical leave and ongoing neurological impairment after intensive GPT-4o use.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1b","P1c","P1d","P2c","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's self-harm, hospitalization, professional harm, and functional impairment. Threatened family harm is not counted because no injury is recorded.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-PA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://njbiz.com/platkin-openai-chatgpt-lawsuit-mental-health/","primarySourceLabel":"NJBIZ — Platkin sues OpenAI over ChatGPT mental harms","firstPublishedAt":"2026-04-28T13:00:13.190311+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T03:13:04.910868+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","gpt-4o","openai","microsoft","sam-altman","psychosis","sycophancy","dependency","us","pennsylvania","platkin"]},{"id":"2026-doe-v-openai-stalking","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-10 against the two cited bodies (TechCrunch, read live in English; Bloomberg Law, whose live page exposes only the opening paragraphs before a login wall) and two newly inspected English bodies, The San Francisco Standard of 13 Apr 2026 and the Times of India relay of 11 Apr 2026. TechCrunch states the suit was 'filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco County' and the SF Standard reports 'a Monday hearing in San Francisco Superior Court' before Judge Harold Kahn, which place the court in the United States. The SF Standard describes the plaintiff as 'A San Francisco woman', which is her reported location and supports affected_person_countries US; TechCrunch's '53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur' describes the ChatGPT user. No body states where the stalking, the distribution of the generated reports to her family, friends and employer, or the January 2026 arrest took place: the SF Standard says the man was released 'from custody in another jurisdiction' without naming it, and her November notice being copied to the San Francisco Police Department is a police force's location, not an event location. Residence and police location do not locate an event, so event_countries remains a reviewed unknown. The provider's headquarters, the court's seat and the outlets' locations were not used.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"California","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"filed in California Superior Court by Edelson PC","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"according to a new lawsuit filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco County","location":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/stalking-victim-sues-openai-claims-chatgpt-fueled-her-abusers-delusions-and-ignored-her-warnings/","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"A San Francisco woman is asking a judge to order OpenAI","location":"https://sfstandard.com/2026/04/13/woman-fears-life-s-asking-judge-cut-ex-s-chatgpt/","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"In a Monday hearing in San Francisco Superior Court, Judge Harold Kahn ordered OpenAI","location":"https://sfstandard.com/2026/04/13/woman-fears-life-s-asking-judge-cut-ex-s-chatgpt/","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The event setting is unknown after review. No inspected body states where the stalking, the distribution of the ChatGPT-generated reports or the January 2026 arrest occurred; 'San Francisco woman' and 'Silicon Valley entrepreneur' describe the people, the man was released 'from custody in another jurisdiction' that no body names, and copying SFPD on the November notice is a police force's location, not an event location.","The complaint (San Francisco County Superior Court No. CGC26635725) was not obtained: edelson.com returned HTTP 403 live with no Internet Archive capture, and state-court filings are not on CourtListener. The geography rests on the outlets' statements about the filing and hearing.","Bloomberg Law was read only to its login wall (first three paragraphs, the third truncated).","Lead for a later full review: the SF Standard reports a 13 Apr 2026 hearing continuing the account suspension to a May hearing and OpenAI's written declaration that the account had not been accessed in over three months; the retained row's outcome_details stop at the filing."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-10","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/stalking-victim-sues-openai-claims-chatgpt-fueled-her-abusers-delusions-and-ignored-her-warnings/","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US, English, about 10,000 characters). States the suit was 'filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco County', describes the user as 'a 53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur', the plaintiff as 'Jane Doe', the temporary-restraining-order application, the November Notice of Abuse, the January arrest and the incompetency finding. Names no place for the stalking, the report distribution or the arrest.","access":"read","language":"en-US"},{"url":"https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/openai-accused-of-encouraging-stalkers-delusion-through-chatgpt","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English). Only the headline, dateline (April 10, 2026) and first three paragraphs (the third cut mid-sentence) are exposed before a 'Log in to keep reading' wall (about 1,400 characters). The visible text states the complaint was 'filed Thursday in California Superior Court' and describes the GPT-4o-generated clinical-style reports; it names no event location. The remainder of the article was not read.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://sfstandard.com/2026/04/13/woman-fears-life-s-asking-judge-cut-ex-s-chatgpt/","notes":"Newly inspected on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English, about 12,800 characters). The Standard reviewed the court filings and spoke to the plaintiff's lawyers. Describes the plaintiff as 'A San Francisco woman', the Monday (13 Apr 2026) hearing before Judge Harold Kahn in San Francisco Superior Court continuing the account suspension until a May hearing, OpenAI's declaration that the account had not been accessed in over three months, the November notice copied to SFPD and the FBI, and the ex-partner's release 'from custody in another jurisdiction' (not named). Not a cited source of the row; a lead for a later full review (post-filing hearing and OpenAI's response).","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/silicon-valley-entrepreneur-accused-of-using-chatgpt-to-harass-and-stalk-ex-girlfriend-openai-sued/articleshow/130186639.cms","notes":"Newly inspected on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English). A relay of the complaint reporting ('according to a lawsuit filed in California'; '53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur') with no reporting of its own and no event location; not independent of the TechCrunch account.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Jane Doe lawsuit alleges ChatGPT reinforced her abuser’s delusions and stalking","summary":"A woman’s lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced an abuser’s delusions, helped him create psychological claims about her and failed to address warnings about his conduct. The complaint describes stalking, threats and resulting harm. Those assertions remain the plaintiff’s allegations.","incidentDate":"2025-07-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-04-09","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["third_party_harm_facilitation","delusion_reinforcement","psychological_manipulation","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","reputational_harm","exploitation_or_abuse","harm_to_others","legal_harm","loss_of_liberty","psychiatric_deterioration"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A participant distributed AI-generated diagnostic claims about his former partner, was later arrested for alleged bomb threats and assault, and was found incompetent to stand trial. The former partner sued over the resulting stalking and abuse.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1c","P1d","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5b","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"both","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint and criminal record document one AI participant's psychiatric and legal harms and one former partner's stalking, reputational, and psychological harms.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/stalking-victim-sues-openai-claims-chatgpt-fueled-her-abusers-delusions-and-ignored-her-warnings/","primarySourceLabel":"TechCrunch — Stalking victim sues OpenAI","firstPublishedAt":"2026-04-28T13:00:08.422853+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-10T03:26:40.997203+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","openai","stalking","harassment","bomb-threats","third-party-harm","delusion","us","california","edelson"]},{"id":"2026-lantieri-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-12 against the complaint itself (Lantieri v. OpenAI, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, file-stamped 02/27/2026, case number CGC-26-634445; PDF from the plaintiff firm, read in full in English) and the firm's PR Newswire release of 6 March 2026 (English). The complaint places the conversations between 14 April and 15 May 2025 and describes the harmful events of 15 May 2025: entry into two neighbours' apartments, the jump from a moving vehicle on the way to the hospital, the grand mal seizure in the emergency room and the intensive care stay. It names no city, county, state or hospital for any of these events. Its venue paragraph says wrongful conduct occurred in San Francisco County, which refers to the defendants' conduct, not to where the plaintiff was harmed. Paragraph 19 states that the plaintiff is a resident of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which supports affected_person_countries US; residence was not used as the event location, so event_countries stays a reviewed unknown. The caption and the release support court_countries US. The 2026-09-15 evidence passage \"Bay Area, California\" from victim_description is not carried forward because the complaint contradicts it.","evidence":[{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Plaintiff Michele Lantieri is a natural person and resident of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.","location":"https://stranchlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/2026-02-27-Lantieri-v-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO","location":"https://stranchlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/2026-02-27-Lantieri-v-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"has filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of San Francisco against OpenAI and Microsoft","location":"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stranch-jennings--garvey-files-lawsuit-against-openai-302707198.html","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["Event setting: the complaint names no city, state or hospital for the 15 May 2025 events; event_countries remains a reviewed unknown.","Narrative corrections made from the complaint by a separate update on 2026-10-12, outside this metadata review: the residence (paragraph 19, Pennsylvania; previously recorded as Bay Area, California), the event window (conversations 14 April to 15 May 2025 and hospitalisation on 15 May 2025; previously 2026-01-15), the file stamp of 27 February 2026 (the firm's release is dated 6 March 2026) and Samuel Altman as a named defendant."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-12","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://stranchlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/2026-02-27-Lantieri-v-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf","notes":"Complaint PDF fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, 529,059 bytes; a byte-identical Internet Archive capture of 11 May 2026 exists), text extracted with pdftotext and read in full. Linked from the firm's release under an older filename that now returns HTTP 404; the live file is named 2026-02-27-Lantieri-v-OpenAI-Complaint.pdf. Defendants include OpenAI entities, Microsoft and Samuel Altman. Gives the residence (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), the conversation window 14 April to 15 May 2025, the 15 May 2025 events and hospital messages of 16 and 17 May 2025; names no place for the events or the hospital.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stranch-jennings--garvey-files-lawsuit-against-openai-302707198.html","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, html lang en). Plaintiff firm's release datelined OAKLAND, Calif., March 6, 2026; the dateline is the firm's office, not an event location. Describes the jump from a moving vehicle into traffic and the seizure without a place. Advocacy release by plaintiff counsel.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.ttownmedia.com/online_features/press_releases/stranch-jennings-garvey-files-lawsuit-against-openai/article_f871c0ab-870c-5eda-9411-358bf024d972.html","notes":"Press-release mirror. Fetch on 2026-10-12 returned HTTP 429 (67 bytes); not read, so no language is recorded. It mirrors the PR Newswire text and adds no independent account.","access":"unavailable","language":null},{"url":"https://socialmediavictims.org/chatgpt-lawsuits/","notes":"Social Media Victims Law Center ChatGPT lawsuit tracker, fetched live on 2026-10-12 (HTTP 200, html lang en-US). The current page does not mention Lantieri, so it supplies no location or case detail for this record.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Lantieri lawsuit alleges psychiatric crisis and serious injury during ChatGPT use","summary":"The Lantieri lawsuit alleges that intensive GPT-4o use reinforced delusional beliefs before a psychiatric crisis and serious injuries requiring hospital care. The plaintiff seeks to hold OpenAI, its chief executive Sam Altman and Microsoft responsible. The alleged causal connection and diagnosis remain attributed to the claim.","incidentDate":"2025-04-14","incidentEndDate":"2025-05-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-03-06","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["delusion_reinforcement","dependency_creation","psychological_manipulation","crisis_response","identity_destabilization"],"harmOutcomes":["physical_injury","hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","functional_impairment"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the complaint, Michele Lantieri jumped from a moving vehicle during a psychotic break, suffered a seizure and brain injury, and required hospitalization after five weeks of intensive GPT-4o use.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1c","P1d","P2c","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's injury, seizure, brain injury, and hospitalization.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stranch-jennings--garvey-files-lawsuit-against-openai-302707198.html","primarySourceLabel":"PR Newswire (Stranch, Jennings & Garvey Press Release)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-03-23T06:59:27.928554+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-12T03:07:18.629706+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","openai","microsoft","psychosis","brain_damage","gpt-4o"]},{"id":"2026-decruise-v-openai","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-10 against the three cited bodies (Ars Technica, Mashable, Breitbart, all read live in English) and the complaint PDF linked by Ars and Mashable (DocumentCloud document 27170664, read from the Internet Archive capture of 2026-03-15 because the live host returned HTTP 403). The complaint is captioned 'FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO' (Superior Court of California), which places the court in the United States, and states 'Plaintiff Darian Decruise resides in Georgia', which is his reported residence and supports affected_person_countries US. Ars Technica calls him 'A Georgia college student' and reports the filing 'in San Diego Superior Court'. Neither the complaint nor any outlet states where the ChatGPT use, the referral to the school therapist or the one-week involuntary hospitalisation took place: the complaint never names the college or a city, and the outlets' 'Morehouse College student ... in Georgia' describes the person. Residence does not locate an event, so event_countries remains a reviewed unknown. The provider's headquarters, the court's seat and the outlets' locations were not used.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Morehouse College student, Georgia","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"San Diego Superior Court, California","location":"outcome_details","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"Plaintiff Darian Decruise resides in Georgia","location":"https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/27170664/decruise-v-opeenai.pdf","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO","location":"https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/27170664/decruise-v-opeenai.pdf","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"A Georgia college student named Darian DeCruise has sued OpenAI","location":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/before-psychosis-chatgpt-told-man-he-was-an-oracle-new-lawsuit-alleges/","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"which was filed late last month in San Diego Superior Court","location":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/before-psychosis-chatgpt-told-man-he-was-an-oracle-new-lawsuit-alleges/","supports":["court_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["The event setting is unknown after review. The complaint and the three cited bodies state the plaintiff's residence (Georgia) and his college (Morehouse College, in the outlets only) but none states where the ChatGPT conversations, the school-therapist referral or the hospitalisation occurred; residence does not locate an event.","The Law.com Recorder report of 26 Jan 2026 that Ars credits as first reporting the filing returned a paywall shell (HTTP 200, no article text, live and in the 2026-09-25 Internet Archive capture) and could not be read.","The complaint was read from an archived copy, not the live host; the DocumentCloud page and API returned HTTP 403. The retained row's statement that the case was consolidated into a California JCCP in late February 2026 was not re-checked in this metadata pass."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-10","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/before-psychosis-chatgpt-told-man-he-was-an-oracle-new-lawsuit-alleges/","notes":"Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English, about 4,900 characters of article text). States the filing 'late last month in San Diego Superior Court', describes the plaintiff as 'A Georgia college student' and a 'Morehouse College student', credits ALM with first reporting the case, and links the complaint on DocumentCloud. Names no city or state for the use, the therapist referral or the hospitalisation.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://mashable.com/article/ai-injury-attorneys-ai-psychosis-case-chatgpt-openai-lawsuit","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English). Describes 'Morehouse College student Darian DeCruise in Georgia', the Schenk Law Firm's 'AI injury attorneys' marketing, the hospitalisation and bipolar diagnosis, and the missed semester; links the same DocumentCloud complaint. Carries a Ziff Davis disclosure. Locates no event.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2026/02/21/college-student-sues-openai-claiming-chatgpt-caused-a-psychological-break/","notes":"Fetched live on 2026-10-10 (HTTP 200, html lang en, English). Its second paragraph reads 'Ars Technica reports that Darian DeCruise, a student at Morehouse College, has initiated legal action against OpenAI in San Diego Superior Court' and adds no reporting of its own; derivative of the Ars Technica source and not independent. 'A college student from Georgia' describes the person.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/27170664/decruise-v-opeenai.pdf","notes":"The complaint linked by Ars Technica and Mashable (DocumentCloud document 27170664). Live DocumentCloud URLs returned HTTP 403 to this fetcher on 2026-10-10; the PDF was read from the Internet Archive capture web/20260315214754id_ (2,399,468 bytes, PDF 1.7, text extracted with pdftotext, English, about 96,700 characters). Captioned for the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego; paragraph 1 states 'Plaintiff Darian Decruise resides in Georgia'; the factual allegations describe college use from 2023, the shift in ChatGPT's responses, the school therapist referral and the one-week involuntary hospitalisation without naming the college, a city or a state. Venue rests on the defendants transacting business in the county. Exhibits, if any, were not separately inspected.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"DeCruise lawsuit alleges ChatGPT reinforced delusions preceding hospitalisation","summary":"The DeCruise lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced beliefs that the plaintiff had a special destiny and encouraged isolation before involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation. Reporting describes the complaint. The alleged causal role remains unestablished.","incidentDate":"2025-04-15","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-02-19","aiSystem":"ChatGPT","aiProduct":"ChatGPT","aiCompany":"OpenAI, Inc.","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["delusion_reinforcement","isolation_encouragement","dependency_creation","treatment_discouragement"],"harmOutcomes":["hospitalization","psychiatric_deterioration","social_isolation"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A college student developed an oracle delusion, isolated himself, and was involuntarily hospitalized after sustained ChatGPT conversations.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1c","P2c","P2d","P3a","P3b","P3d","P5a"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one named participant's psychiatric deterioration, isolation, and hospitalization.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-CA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/before-psychosis-chatgpt-told-man-he-was-an-oracle-new-lawsuit-alleges/","primarySourceLabel":"Ars Technica","firstPublishedAt":"2026-02-22T09:59:21.046033+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-10T03:26:40.763043+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["lawsuit","chatgpt","openai","psychosis","hospitalization","delusion","isolation","adult","us"]}]}