{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-25T16:46:13.425Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"missouri","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":7,"coverage":{"cases":7,"countries":1,"languages":1,"unknownLocation":0,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":2,"lawsuits":1,"regulatory":1,"minors":1,"coreRelations":5,"contextualRelations":2,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-missouri-pizzeria-says-google-ai-overviews-showed-nonexistent-specials-angry-customers-yelled-at-staff","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Please do not use Google AI to find out our specials. Please go on our Facebook page or our website. Google AI is not accurate and is telling people specials that do not exist which is causing angry customers yelling at our employees. We cannot control what Google posts or says and we will not honor the Google AI specials.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The false information led to customer complaints and confusion, forcing the restaurant to post on Facebook and ask customers not to rely on AI-generated search results.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"In August 2025 the restaurant posted on Facebook asking customers not to use Google AI to find its specials, saying Google AI was telling people about specials that do not exist, that this was causing angry customers to yell at its employees, and that it would not honour the Google AI specials.","causal_attribution":"The restaurant's own post, quoted by KMOV and summarised by the same reporter for InvestigateTV; one origin."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'One example she shared was an AI Overview that showed that Stefanina’s would offer a large pizza for the same price as a small.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'According to the business, a common confusion displayed by Google AI surrounds a deal in which customers can buy a small pizza and get another one for $4.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Stefanina’s in Wentzville has received calls from customers asking about deals that Google’s AI overview claims the restaurant offers, including a promotion for a second pizza for $4 and incorrect pricing information that said large pizzas cost the same as small ones.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Restaurant staff say Google's AI Overview showed deals and prices the restaurant does not offer, including a large pizza for the price of a small one and a second pizza for $4.","causal_attribution":"Restaurant staff accounts to two newsrooms; the same family member is the main witness in all three reports, so one origin. Google did not respond."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'When he told me how he found the information, he typed it in his Google search bar. And that first response that people see is generated by AI, so he couldn’t find it again,'; 'customers are coming back, being like, ‘Why aren’t you honoring the specials that say that is offered by you?’'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A restaurant manager told FOX 2 that a customer came in asking for a special the manager did not know of, having found it in the AI-generated first response to a Google search, and that customers kept asking why the restaurant was not honouring specials the AI said it offered.","causal_attribution":"The manager's account to FOX 2; the customer was not interviewed."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'As a small business, we can’t honor a Google AI special.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'We can’t, as a small family business, honor a Google AI special,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The restaurant says that, as a small family business, it cannot honour Google AI specials.","causal_attribution":"The restaurant's statements to the Gray Media reporter; one origin."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'It just seems unreasonable that people are coming in here, asking about food they don’t have,'; 'It’s got to be nerve-wracking for them.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A diner told FOX 2 it seemed unreasonable that people were coming in asking for food the restaurant did not have, and that it must be nerve-wracking for the staff.","causal_attribution":"A diner's impression given to FOX 2; he does not describe being misled himself."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Google did not respond to FirstAlert4’s messages about the situation.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Stefanina’s has been attempting to contact Google about their AI concerns, but they have received “inadequate responses.”'; 'FOX 2 also reached out to Google and did not receive a response in time for publication.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Google did not respond to either station's requests for comment; the restaurant told FOX 2 its attempts to contact Google had received inadequate responses.","causal_attribution":"Each station's own statement of its unanswered request; the restaurant's description of Google's replies is its own."}],"effects":[{"label":"customers misled about nonexistent specials and staff confronted by angry customers","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.firstalert4.com/2025/08/20/please-do-not-use-google-ai-find-out-our-specials-wentzville-restaurant-asks-patrons/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"KMOV First Alert 4 report published 19 August 2025, quoting the restaurant's Facebook post and a member of the owning family; read in full (HTTP 200). English original; no translation.","independence_group":"gray-media-kmov-investigatetv-wentzville"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://fox2now.com/news/missouri/we-cannot-honor-ai-specials-wentzville-restaurant-swamped-with-fake-menu-items/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"FOX 2 St. Louis report of 12 September 2025 with its own interviews of restaurant staff and a diner; the live page returned HTTP 403 and an Internet Archive capture was read in full. English original; no translation.","independence_group":"fox2-st-louis-12-sep-2025"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.kktv.com/2026/01/30/restaurant-asks-customers-verify-information-after-ai-generates-fake-deals/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"InvestigateTV report on KKTV, 30 January 2026, by the same Gray Media reporter as the KMOV story, with further quotations from the restaurant; read in full (HTTP 200). English original; no translation.","independence_group":"gray-media-kmov-investigatetv-wentzville"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use","others_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life","work"],"unknowns":["When the AI Overview answers began and how long they continued; the January 2026 InvestigateTV report may republish the August 2025 story.","How many customers were misled and how many confrontations occurred.","The exact AI Overview text; no screenshot is published in the inspected reports.","Whether the $4 second-pizza deal shown by the AI distorted a deal the restaurant runs on Wednesdays: FOX 2 quotes the manager as saying the restaurant never offered that special and also that it has only ever run a deal on Wednesdays."],"geography":{"basis":"The restaurant is in Wentzville, Missouri, and the customers it describes came to or called the restaurant there (KMOV, FOX 2, InvestigateTV).","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with): the restaurant says Google's AI Overview told customers about specials and prices it does not offer, customers came in or called asking for them and were refused, and its post says this caused angry customers to yell at employees. The account is the restaurant's; Google did not comment.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The restaurant says Google's AI Overview answers to customers' searches stated specials and prices it does not offer (a large pizza for the price of a small one, a second pizza for $4); a manager describes a customer who came in asking for a special found in the AI-generated first search response, and the restaurant's post says the nonexistent specials were causing angry customers to yell at its employees. Google did not respond, and no AI Overview output was published or inspected.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Missouri pizzeria says Google AI Overviews told customers about specials that do not exist, and that angry customers demanding them yelled at staff","summary":"In August 2025 Stefanina's, a family-owned pizzeria in Wentzville, Missouri, posted on Facebook asking customers not to use Google AI to find its specials. The restaurant said Google AI was telling people about specials that do not exist, that this was causing angry customers to yell at its employees, and that it would not honour the Google AI specials. Staff told KMOV and FOX 2 that the AI Overview at the top of Google Search had shown deals such as a large pizza for the price of a small one and a second pizza for $4. A manager described a customer who came in asking for a special the manager had never heard of, found in the AI-generated first search response, and said customers kept asking why the specials were not honoured. Google did not respond to either station. The account comes from the restaurant; no AI Overview text or customer account was published.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-08-19","aiSystem":"Google AI Overviews, the AI-generated summary shown at the top of Google Search results, which the restaurant says stated specials and prices it does not offer","aiProduct":"Google AI Overviews (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The restaurant says customers misled by the AI Overview were refused specials that do not exist and that angry customers yelled at its employees; no number of affected people is given.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"Unquantified: the restaurant refers to angry customers and its employees in the plural without a number, and a manager describes one customer individually without saying that customer was harmed beyond being refused; no lower bound is stated.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.firstalert4.com/2025/08/20/please-do-not-use-google-ai-find-out-our-specials-wentzville-restaurant-asks-patrons/","primarySourceLabel":"KMOV First Alert 4, 19 August 2025: Wentzville restaurant asks patrons not to use Google AI to find its specials","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:05:22.535996+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:05:22.535996+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai_overviews","search_summary","false_business_information","restaurant","customer_conflict"]},{"id":"2026-boone-county-missouri-sheriff-says-ai-copy-of-daughters-voice-used-in-fake-kidnapping-ransom-call","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Officials are investigating a suspected AI-generated scam incident that occurred on Friday.'; 'They initially believed they were speaking with their daughter, who claimed she had been kidnapped at gunpoint, before another subject demanded a ransom over the phone, according to a press release.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The caller said she had been kidnapped at gunpoint, and then another voice came on the phone and demanded money from the victim, according to the post.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'the victim received a call Friday that showed their daughter's contact name and number. The caller allegedly had the daughter’s voice and told the victim she had been kidnapped at gunpoint before another voice demanded money, essentially asking for a ransom.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"According to the Boone County Sheriff's Office, a Boone County resident received a call on Friday 17 July 2026 whose caller ID showed their daughter's number; a voice like the daughter's said she had been kidnapped at gunpoint, and another voice then demanded ransom.","causal_attribution":"One origin: the sheriff's office statement (Facebook post and press release) relayed by three outlets."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Although the caller ID appeared to be their daughter's, officials determined that the voice was an AI-generated replication that sounded like her.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'it was later determined that the person the victim was speaking to was actually an AI-generated voice that sounded like their daughter, according to the post.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'\"It was later determined the person they were speaking with was not the daughter but rather an AI generated voice that sounded like their daughter,\" the post says.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The sheriff's office said it later determined that the voice on the call was not the daughter but an AI-generated voice that sounded like her; it has not said how this was established.","causal_attribution":"The investigating sheriff's office's own determination, relayed by three outlets; one origin. No technical basis is published."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The parents reported the call to deputies, and officials launched a coordinated response to locate the daughter in Jefferson City. She was found safe, unharmed and unaware of what had occurred.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'A coordinated law enforcement response found the real daughter in Jefferson City, unaware of the scam.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"After the call was reported to deputies, a coordinated law-enforcement response found the daughter safe in Jefferson City, unaware of the call.","causal_attribution":"The sheriff's office statement as relayed; one origin."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'BCSD stated that this is the first incident of this type they have encountered, in which scammers used AI to make the victim believe they were speaking on the phone with their loved one.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The post added that this is the first incident the Sheriff's Office has encountered where a suspect has used AI technology to make the victim believe they're speaking to a loved one over the phone.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'BCSO Captain Brian Leer said that this is the first time the department has encountered a call using AI voice impersonation.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The sheriff's office said this was the first call it had encountered in which AI voice impersonation was used to make a victim believe they were speaking with a loved one.","causal_attribution":"The sheriff's office post and its captain's interview; one institutional origin."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Adding that this call generated a large law enforcement response and attempted to extort someone.'; 'A suspect hasn't been identified or arrested, according to the Boone County Sheriff’s Office.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Captain Brian Leer said the call generated a large law-enforcement response and was an attempt to extort, and the office said no suspect had been identified or arrested.","causal_attribution":"ABC17's interview with the captain and its account of the office's statement; single source."}],"effects":[{"label":"told by an AI imitation of their daughter's voice that she had been kidnapped at gunpoint, then asked for ransom","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://krcgtv.com/news/local/boone-county-investigates-ai-voice-scam-to-demand-ransom","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-15 by the research agent (an AI); no translation was needed. KRCG report published Saturday 18 July 2026, 10:28 CDT (HTTP 200), relaying the sheriff's office press release.","independence_group":"boone-county-sheriffs-office-jul-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.komu.com/news/midmissourinews/boone-county-sheriffs-office-reports-its-first-incident-involving-ai-voice-impersonation/article_dfe7e951-68b3-46bf-b985-7dc088e072c1.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-15 by the research agent (an AI); no translation was needed. KOMU 8 report published 18 July 2026, relaying the sheriff's office Facebook post. The live page returned HTTP 429 to the fetcher; the text was read from an Internet Archive capture of the same URL (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"boone-county-sheriffs-office-jul-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://abc17news.com/news/boone/2026/07/19/boone-county-sheriffs-office-warns-residents-after-ai-swatting-call/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-15 by the research agent (an AI); no translation was needed. ABC17 News report published 19 July 2026 (HTTP 200), quoting the sheriff's office Facebook post and an interview with Captain Brian Leer of the same office; one institutional origin with s1 and s2.","independence_group":"boone-county-sheriffs-office-jul-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["relationships","finance","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["How the sheriff's office established that the voice was AI-generated (no source says whether a recording of the call was examined), and which tool was used","Whether one or both parents took the call, and their reaction beyond initially believing it","Whether any money was paid","Who made the call; no suspect had been identified by 19 July 2026"],"geography":{"basis":"Event: the sheriff's office says the scam 'has hit Boone County' after a resident reported the call (s3), and KRCG describes it as a Boone County investigation (s1); Boone County is in Missouri. Affected person: described as a Boone County resident (s3). No court is involved.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a reported case: the Boone County Sheriff's Office, which investigated the call, says the voice that told a resident their daughter had been kidnapped at gunpoint was an AI-generated imitation of the daughter, and a second voice demanded ransom. All claims rest on the office's statement relayed by three local outlets; its technical basis is undisclosed. No payment is reported, so severity is low.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The Boone County Sheriff's Office, which investigated the call, said it later determined that the voice the resident heard was 'an AI generated voice that sounded like their daughter' (its Facebook post as quoted by ABC17 News and KOMU; KRCG relays the press release: 'officials determined that the voice was an AI-generated replication'). That generated voice told the resident the daughter had been kidnapped at gunpoint before a second voice demanded ransom, so the AI output spoke to the resident (communicated_with) and imitated the daughter toward the resident (depicted_or_impersonated). The office has not published how it established that the voice was AI-generated, and no tool is identified.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with","depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Boone County, Missouri: sheriff's office says a fake-kidnapping ransom call used an AI-generated copy of a resident's daughter's voice","summary":"The Boone County Sheriff's Office in Missouri said that on Friday 17 July 2026 a resident received a call whose caller ID showed their daughter's number. A voice that sounded like the daughter said she had been kidnapped at gunpoint, and another voice then demanded ransom. The office said it later determined that the voice was AI-generated, without saying how. Deputies found the daughter safe in Jefferson City and unaware of the call. The office called it the first AI voice-impersonation call it had encountered. No suspect had been identified by 19 July, and no source reports whether any money was paid.","incidentDate":"2026-07-17","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-07-18","aiSystem":"AI-generated voice imitating the resident's daughter, as determined by the Boone County Sheriff's Office (tool not identified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the Boone County Sheriff's Office, a resident was told by an AI-generated imitation of their daughter's voice that she had been kidnapped at gunpoint and was then asked for ransom; KRCG reports the parents initially believed it. The sources describe no further reaction and no payment; the believed kidnapping and the extortion attempt are the reported adverse experience.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"At least one person: the resident who received the call ('the victim' in the sheriff's post as relayed by KOMU and ABC17). KRCG says 'parents', which may mean two people, so one is a lower bound. The daughter whose voice was imitated is not counted because no harm to her is reported. The person called did not use the AI.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://krcgtv.com/news/local/boone-county-investigates-ai-voice-scam-to-demand-ransom","primarySourceLabel":"KRCG, 18 July 2026: Boone County investigates AI voice scam to demand ransom","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-15T02:58:10.915736+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-15T02:58:10.915736+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["voice-clone","fake-kidnapping-call","ransom-demand","missouri","sheriffs-office"]},{"id":"2026-us-hospital-nurses-say-ai-scheduling-tool-overrode-shift-requests-and-assigned-days-off","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Since 2023, HCA has rolled out an AI scheduling tool it co-developed with Palantir called Timpani at roughly 130 of its 190 locations.'; 'it uses algorithmic forecasts of patient volumes and staffing needs to automatically build nursing schedules'; 'The efficiency comes from AI generating stronger initial schedules,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"HCA co-developed Timpani with Palantir as an AI scheduling tool, has rolled it out at roughly 130 of 190 locations since 2023, and uses it to build nursing schedules automatically from algorithmic forecasts; an HCA executive wrote that its efficiency comes from AI generating stronger initial schedules.","causal_attribution":"WIRED's description and the executive's paper as quoted; this establishes the AI scheduling role."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Over the past four months, Amber Retzloff, a critical care nurse in Florida, requested to work 50 specific 12-hour shifts. But over half the time, she says her hospital'; 'Palantir-powered scheduling software assigned her to different shifts, often putting her on back-to-back-to-back days and leaving her mentally drained.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A Florida critical care nurse said that over four months the scheduling software assigned her different shifts for over half of the 50 she requested, often back-to-back days that left her mentally drained.","causal_attribution":"The nurse's own account to WIRED."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Barker says now essentially every nurse has been assigned to work on a day they were supposed to be off. Barker delayed a long-planned doctor'; 'appointment for a chronic condition after struggling to trade an assigned red day.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A Missouri nurse said the tool assigned essentially every nurse at the facility to work a requested day off, and that the nurse delayed a long-planned doctor's appointment for a chronic condition after struggling to trade such a day.","causal_attribution":"The nurse's own account to WIRED."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'says that nursing leaders, not Timpani, make final scheduling decisions'; 'On average, Timpani schedules nurses for 1 percent of their requested days off, or what are known as red days, according to HCA.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"HCA says nursing leaders, not Timpani, make final scheduling decisions, that the tool schedules nurses on 1 percent of requested days off on average, and that it keeps improving the tool on nurses' feedback.","causal_attribution":"HCA's statements, preserved as counterevidence on who decides."}],"effects":[{"label":"nurses say an AI scheduling tool overrode their shift requests and days off, leaving one exhausted and leading another to delay a medical appointment","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/ai-making-mess-of-nurses-schedules-they-say-its-a-safety-issue/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200); no translation. WIRED reports interviews with nurses, HCA's and Palantir's statements and an HCA executive's paper.","independence_group":"wired-nurse-interviews"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["work","health"],"unknowns":["The dates of the specific assignments described; WIRED reports the four months before its October 2026 article for the Florida nurse.","Whether managers reviewed or edited the specific schedules the nurses describe.","The outcome of the Missouri union grievance."],"geography":{"basis":"WIRED places the nurses at HCA hospitals in Florida and Missouri, United States.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the approved AI workforce-scheduling class: two named nurses told WIRED that HCA's AI scheduling tool, which builds schedules automatically, assigned them shifts and a requested day off against their preferences, with exhaustion and a delayed medical appointment as consequences. HCA disputes that the tool makes final decisions.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"WIRED describes Timpani as an AI scheduling tool that builds nursing schedules automatically from algorithmic forecasts of patient volumes and staffing, and quotes HCA's innovation executive writing that its efficiency comes from AI generating stronger initial schedules, which distinguishes it from ordinary rota software by the operator's own account. The nurses say the tool assigned them shifts and days off against their requests, with the consequences they describe. HCA says nursing leaders make the final decisions, so the allocation is recorded both as the tool's decision (nurses' account) and as an AI output informing managers' decisions (HCA's account).","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["made_decision_about","informed_decision_about"]},"name":"US: HCA nurses tell WIRED its AI scheduling tool overrode their shift requests and scheduled them on requested days off; one delayed a medical appointment","summary":"Nurses at HCA Healthcare, the largest US hospital chain, told WIRED, in an article published on 2 October 2026, that Timpani, an AI scheduling tool HCA co-developed with Palantir and has rolled out at about 130 of its 190 locations, assigns shifts that ignore their requests. A Florida critical care nurse said that over four months the tool gave her different shifts for more than half of the 50 she requested, often back-to-back days that left her mentally drained. A Missouri nurse said essentially every nurse at their facility had been assigned to work on a requested day off, and that they delayed a long-planned doctor's appointment for a chronic condition after struggling to trade such a day. HCA says nursing leaders, not Timpani, make final scheduling decisions and that the tool schedules nurses on about 1 percent of requested days off.","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-10-02","aiSystem":"Timpani, an AI scheduling tool co-developed by HCA Healthcare and Palantir on Palantir Foundry, which uses algorithmic forecasts of patient volumes and staffing needs to build nursing schedules automatically","aiProduct":"Timpani","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["loss_of_autonomy","psychological_distress","treatment_disruption"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the nurses interviewed by WIRED, the AI scheduling tool repeatedly assigned a Florida nurse shifts she had not requested, often back-to-back days that left her mentally drained, and assigned a Missouri nurse to work on a requested day off, leading Barker to delay a doctor's appointment for a chronic condition. HCA says managers make final decisions.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"Two counted: the Florida and Missouri nurses who describe specific consequences. Barker says essentially every nurse at the Missouri centre was assigned a requested day off, and five other nurses describe problems, but no further count with a stated consequence is given; patients are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.wired.com/story/ai-making-mess-of-nurses-schedules-they-say-its-a-safety-issue/","primarySourceLabel":"WIRED, 2 October 2026: AI is making a mess of nurses' schedules","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-13T03:27:43.266051+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:27:43.266051+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["workplace-ai","scheduling","nurses","hospital","palantir","union-grievance"]},{"id":"2026-missouri-alleged-ai-child-image-abuse-charges","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'is accused of using an AI chatbot to remove the clothing of photographed children and create sexually explicit images'; 'would get photographs of children off of (information redacted) and upload them to an AI generator to undress them'; 'He stated one that had absolutely no regulations was on (information redacted).'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the police probable cause statement as reported by the Daily American Republic, the man told officers in an interview that he would take photographs of children from a source redacted in the filing and upload them to an AI generator to undress them, and that one such tool had no regulations; the newspaper reports that he is accused of using an AI chatbot to remove the clothing of photographed children and create sexually explicit images.","causal_attribution":"The accused's statement as recorded by police in the probable cause statement and read by one newspaper. He has pleaded not guilty, and the police accounts given to KFVS12 and KWOC do not mention AI."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'A North Carolina task force received the initial cybertip April 20 regarding the possible possession, manufacture, or distribution of child pornography, also referred to as CSAM.'; 'The tip came from an LLC whose company name was redacted in a probable cause filed with'; 'The LLC operates a publicly accessible generative artificial intelligence chatbot.'; 'DPD said there were two other cybertips linked to the case.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The reported probable cause statement says the first cybertip, received by a North Carolina task force on 20 April 2026, came from a company (name redacted) that operates a publicly accessible generative AI chatbot, and police said two other cybertips were linked to the case.","causal_attribution":"One newspaper's account of the probable cause statement; the content of the tip is not described beyond the offence categories, and the chatbot is not named."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'He faces felony charges of two counts of sexual exploitation of a minor and three counts of possession of child sexual abuse material, second subsequent offense or possession of more than 20 items.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'One count of Class A felony of sexual exploitation of a minor'; 'One count of Class B felony of sexual exploitation of a minor'; 'Three counts of Class B felony of possession of child sexual abuse material - second subsequent offense or possess more than 20 pictures/one film/video'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"He is charged with two felony counts of sexual exploitation of a minor and three felony counts of possession of child sexual abuse material.","causal_attribution":"The newspaper and the police and prosecutor account carried by KFVS12 give the same charge list in near-identical wording, which points to a common charging document rather than independent support, so the claim is reported. The charges are allegations; the charges themselves do not mention AI."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'entered a plea of not guilty Tuesday, Sept. 29, during a preliminary hearing'; 'is next due in court Oct. 22'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"He pleaded not guilty at a preliminary hearing on 29 September 2026 and was next due in court on 22 October 2026.","causal_attribution":"Court report by the Daily American Republic; no other inspected source covers the hearing."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'the Missouri Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force contacted one of its detectives about a tip involving suspicious internet activity'; 'found a significant amount of child sexual abuse material'; 'The investigation is active and ongoing. Additional charges may be filed as investigators continue to review evidence.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'in August his department was contacted by the Missouri Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, regarding a tip of suspicious internet activity'; 'a warrant was obtained to search the suspects social media applications and electronic devices, which yielded a significant amount of child sexual abuse material'; 'the investigation remains active and additional charges may be filed as investigators continue to review evidence'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Police said the Missouri Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force passed them a tip about suspicious internet activity in August 2026, and that a warrant search of the man's social-media accounts and electronic devices found a significant amount of child sexual abuse material; the investigation was ongoing and more charges could follow.","causal_attribution":"One police chain carried by KFVS12 and KWOC; the police account does not say whether any of the material was AI-generated."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On September 25,'; 'formally charged'; 'was arrested and is currently being held on a no-bond'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'was arrested and is currently being held on a no bond warrant for charges including sexual exploitation of a minor and possession of child sexual abuse material'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Prosecutors filed the charges on 25 September 2026, and he was arrested and held on a no-bond warrant.","causal_attribution":"Police and prosecutor account carried by KFVS12 and KWOC (one chain)."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The probable cause lists descriptions of multiple files of sexually explicit images of an adult male and a young girl.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The reported probable cause statement also lists descriptions of multiple files of sexually explicit images of an adult male and a young girl; the report does not say whether these files were AI-generated.","causal_attribution":"One newspaper's summary of the filing; the relation of these files to the AI uploads is not described."}],"effects":[{"label":"photographs of children were allegedly uploaded to an AI generator to undress them and create sexually explicit images (police filing as reported)","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.darnews.com/news/dexter-man-accused-of-using-ai-chatbot-to-create-explicit-images-of-real-children-from-clothed-photographs-0a5c9f5b","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-20 from the Internet Archive capture 20260930031802; the publisher answers HTTP 403 to this host and the capture's visible page is paywalled, so the article text was taken from the page's embedded article data. Court and probable-cause reporting by the Daily American Republic, 29 September 2026; it also quotes the local police chief.","independence_group":"dar-court-report"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.kfvs12.com/2026/09/28/dexter-mo-man-accused-child-sex-crimes/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-20 (KFVS12 Heartland News, published 28 September 2026, updated 13 October 2026). Carries the local police department's account of the investigation and the prosecutors' charges.","independence_group":"local-police-statement"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.kwoc.com/localnews/2026/9/28/0bymnd1a5eeukxwpm9srorwdax443l","kind":"local_radio_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-20 (KWOC News, Today's Talk for 29 September 2026). The police chief's account to the station; same police chain as KFVS12.","independence_group":"local-police-statement"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI generator or chatbot was used; the company that sent the cybertip is redacted.","How many children were depicted, who they are, and whether any of them or their families were told.","Whether the files described as depicting an adult male and a young girl are AI-generated.","Whether any AI-generated image was shared or distributed.","When the images were made; the first cybertip is dated 20 April 2026.","The outcome of the charges; the next hearing was set for 22 October 2026."],"geography":{"basis":"The investigation, search, arrest and charges took place in southeast Missouri (s1, s2, s3); the first cybertip passed through North Carolina and South Carolina law enforcement (s1). Where the images were made is not stated; US rests on the search of his devices and the possession charges. Where the depicted children live is not stated.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Core case (depicted_or_impersonated): a police probable cause statement, as reported by the local newspaper, records the accused's own statement that he uploaded photographs of children to an AI generator to undress them, and that the first cybertip came from the company operating a generative AI chatbot; he is charged with sexual exploitation of a minor and possession of child sexual abuse material and has pleaded not guilty. Police statements to two local outlets, which do not mention AI, also report the charges. Neither the accused nor any child is named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-20"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The Daily American Republic reports from the police probable cause statement that the accused told officers he would upload photographs of children to an AI generator to undress them, and that the first cybertip came from a company operating a publicly accessible generative AI chatbot (s1). The tools are redacted or unnamed. The police accounts given to KFVS12 and KWOC do not mention AI, and the charges as reported do not distinguish AI-generated from other material.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Missouri man charged over child sexual abuse material; police filing says he told officers he used an AI generator to undress children's photographs","summary":"A Missouri man is charged with sexual exploitation of a minor and possession of child sexual abuse material after a cybertip from a company operating a generative AI chatbot. According to the police probable cause statement as reported by a local newspaper, he told officers he uploaded photographs of children to an AI generator to undress them. He pleaded not guilty; the tool and the number of children are not reported.","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-28","aiSystem":"An unnamed 'AI generator' the accused told police he used to undress photographs of children, and a publicly accessible generative AI chatbot whose operator (name redacted in the probable cause statement) sent the first cybertip, as reported by the Daily American Republic","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Photographs of children were uploaded to an AI generator to undress them and create sexually explicit images, according to the accused's statement in the police probable cause statement as reported by the Daily American Republic; he is charged with sexual exploitation of a minor and possession of child sexual abuse material and has pleaded not guilty.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"The reported probable cause statement refers to photographs of children uploaded to an AI generator and to files depicting a young girl, but gives no count of real children depicted. Unquantified, numeric placeholders 0.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"pending","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.darnews.com/news/dexter-man-accused-of-using-ai-chatbot-to-create-explicit-images-of-real-children-from-clothed-photographs-0a5c9f5b","primarySourceLabel":"Daily American Republic, 29 September 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-30T04:13:23.864538+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-20T03:03:39.045048+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-csam","nudify","children","missouri","criminal-charges","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-minneapolis-grok-reported-fake-unmasked-agent-image-and-online-misidentification","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"While the agent wore a mask in eyewitness videos taken of the event, he appeared to be unmasked in many of the social media posts.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Experts warn that AI cannot \"unmask\" individuals.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"AFP found dozens of posts across social media platforms, primarily the Elon Musk-owned X, in which users shared AI-generated images purporting to \"unmask\" the agent","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"An authentic clip of the shooting, replayed by multiple media outlets, does not show any of the ICE agents with their masks off.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"The images are fake. They were created using artificial intelligence to alter a video that showed a masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"shared an apparent photo of the ICE agent unmasked. As Snopes previously reported, these \"unmasking\" images were actually generated with artificial intelligence tools","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"In the hours after the shooting, images purporting to show the federal agent with the mask removed circulated on social media, primarily on X. Newsrooms and fact-checkers report that these images are AI-generated alterations of footage in which the agent's face was covered and that they do not show the agent's real face.","causal_attribution":"NPR, AFP, PolitiFact and Snopes each report that the faces are fabricated, and NPR and AFP quote image-analysis experts. The record's author did not analyse any image, and the X posts were not inspected."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"Another X user posted the image of a masked officer and prompted the chatbot: \"Hey @grok remove this person's face mask.\" Grok promptly generated a hyper-realistic image of the man without a mask.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Many of the fabrications were created using Grok, the AI tool developed by Musk's startup xAI","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"on X, users asked the AI chatbot Grok to remove the man’s mask from images they uploaded. Grok fulfilled such requests and filled in part of the man’s face, but the AI creations are fictional.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"That image appeared to have been generated by xAI's generative AI chatbot, Grok, in response to users on X asking the bot to \"unmask\" the agent","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"It is unclear precisely what accounts first shared the viral images originated","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"When X users asked Grok to remove the mask from images of the masked agent, Grok generated faces that are fictional. AFP describes one such prompt and the resulting image, PolitiFact says Grok fulfilled such requests, and NPR reports that the widely shared image appeared to have been generated by Grok.","causal_attribution":"The corroboration covers the claim that Grok produced at least some unmasked faces on request. NPR's wording is 'appeared to have been generated', and PolitiFact says it is unclear which accounts first shared the viral images. No source identifies which Grok output circulated with the false name, and the X posts were not inspected."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The origin of that name was not immediately clear","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"people shared posts falsely identifying the ICE agent as","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"shared an apparent photo of the ICE agent unmasked. As Snopes previously reported, these \"unmasking\" images were actually generated with artificial intelligence tools","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"Multiple Reddit threads, Facebook pages and some news articles have circulated the name.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"digitally altered photo of what appears to be the actual ICE agent","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"A false name that belongs to real and unrelated men circulated in social media posts about the agent, and some of those posts shared the AI-generated image. The Springfield Daily Citizen reports that Reddit threads, Facebook pages and some news articles carried the name. NPR reports that the origin of the name was not immediately clear.","causal_attribution":"No source establishes that Grok produced the name. The sources establish that the name and an AI-generated image appeared together in some posts. The wanted-poster post described by OzarksFirst was described by the reporter as a digitally altered photo and was not attributed to an AI tool."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"She explained how online actors sometimes use Grok and other publicly available AI tools to “unmask” people in photographs. That appeared to be exactly what had happened here.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"What I would guess happened next is that someone uploaded that AI-generated image to a reverse image search platform, where it surfaced the name","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"who resembles the unmasked person in the AI-generated images","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"The officer’s face looked subtly off, and he wasn’t wearing the mask seen in the videos of the shooting.","relation":"context","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"A disinformation researcher told the newspaper publisher that online actors sometimes use Grok and other AI tools to 'unmask' people in photographs, and guessed that someone uploaded the AI-generated image to a reverse image search platform, which returned the false name. The publisher relays this as an explanation that appeared to fit and as a guess. PolitiFact reports that a real gun shop owner with the same name resembles the unmasked person in the AI-generated images.","causal_attribution":"A researcher's guess relayed by an affected person, and PolitiFact's statement of resemblance. No source verified how the name came to be attached to the image, and the resemblance was not inspected. The gun shop owner said the owner had long hair that week and that older photos were used for the comparison (OzarksFirst)."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"received Facebook messages threatening harm to him and his family and discrediting his business","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"The misidentification spread, and Facebook-owner Meta shut down his personal accounts.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"As of 10 a.m. Jan. 8, his personal Facebook and Instagram account were still inactive.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"he has never worked as an ICE agent","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"I’ve never been to Minnesota and definitely not this week","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"a gun shop owner based in Springfield, Missouri","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"My personal Facebook was suspended and deactivated.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"You’re a murderer. You know, I can’t believe you did this","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"personal Facebook account and when he appealed that decision, the platform quickly denied that appeal","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"A Missouri gun shop owner who shares the false name told local outlets that on 8 January 2026 the owner's personal Facebook page was under attack, that messages threatened harm to the owner and the owner's family, called the owner a murderer and attacked the business, and that Meta suspended the owner's personal Facebook account, and a personal Instagram account was also inactive at 10 a.m. on 8 January. PolitiFact reports that Meta quickly denied an appeal. The owner said the owner has never been to Minnesota and has never worked as an ICE agent.","causal_attribution":"The owner's own account as reported by the Springfield Daily Citizen, OzarksFirst and PolitiFact (email interview). The messages and the suspension notice were not inspected. Whether the personal accounts were later restored is not reported. The sources do not say the messages cited an AI-generated image."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Just hours after the shooting, my phone began to buzz.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"hundreds of posts claiming that the ICE agent who shot","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"were labeled with my name, accompanied by explicit calls for vigilante justice.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"we will be his nightmare!” one post read. Thousands more followed, many using far harsher language.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"tracked more than 5,000 posts claiming","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"We’re fine, and focused on what we can do to help right now.","relation":"context","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"it was leading to an outpouring of anger toward at least two","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"who are in no way linked to the shooting","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The publisher of the Minnesota Star Tribune, who shares the false name, wrote in a newsletter on 10 January 2026 that within hours of the shooting hundreds of posts claimed that the agent had the publisher's name, with explicit calls for vigilante justice, and that a monitoring firm tracked more than 5,000 posts making the claim. NPR reports an outpouring of anger toward at least two men with the name.","causal_attribution":"The publisher's own account. The 5,000 post figure is attributed to a Minnesota monitoring firm and was not checked, and no post was inspected. NPR's phrase does not describe what the anger consisted of. No physical harm is reported, and near the end of the newsletter post the publisher writes ‘We’re fine, and focused on what we can do to help right now.’"},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"We are currently monitoring a coordinated online disinformation campaign incorrectly identifying the ICE agent involved in yesterday’s shooting.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"To be clear, the ICE agent has no known affiliation with the Star Tribune.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The Minnesota Star Tribune posted a statement on X on 8 January 2026 saying that it was monitoring a coordinated online disinformation campaign incorrectly identifying the agent and that the agent has no known affiliation with the newspaper.","causal_attribution":"NPR and PolitiFact quote the newspaper's X post and the post itself was not inspected. The statement does not mention AI."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"There was no immediate comment from X. When reached by AFP, xAI replied with a terse, automated response","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"When AFP asked xAI about the AI fabrications that followed the shooting, xAI replied with a terse automated response, and X gave no immediate comment.","causal_attribution":"AFP's report of xAI's reply. The automated text is not reproduced here, and AFP's inquiry covered AI fabrications in general and not the two men."}],"effects":[{"label":"A gun shop owner sharing the false name reported threatening and accusatory messages, attacks on the business page and suspension of a personal Facebook account after being named online as the agent","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"},{"label":"The publisher of a Minnesota newspaper sharing the false name reported hundreds of posts naming the publisher as the agent, with calls for vigilante justice","claim_id":"c6","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.npr.org/2026/01/08/nx-s1-5671740/ice-minneapolis-grok-ai-renee-nicole-good","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"npr"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20260108-after-minneapolis-shooting-ai-fabrications-of-victim-and-shooter","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"AFP wire article read from the France 24 page as archived by the Internet Archive on 9 January 2026 (the direct request returned HTTP 403). The capture ends with the AFP copyright line.","independence_group":"afp"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://politifact.com/factchecks/2026/jan/08/social-media/ice-agent-minneapolis-steve-grove/","kind":"fact_check","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"politifact"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/renee-good-ice-agent-name/","kind":"fact_check","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"snopes"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://sgfcitizen.org/economy-growth/business/sigwo-arms-facebook-attacked-minnesota-ice-shooting/","kind":"local_newspaper","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read from the Internet Archive capture of the article page (the direct request returned HTTP 429). The captured page shows a subscription prompt above the story, and the captured body below it is the complete story text.","independence_group":"springfield-daily-citizen"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.ozarksfirst.com/news/steven-grove-ice-agent-misinformation/","kind":"local_tv_news","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read from an Internet Archive capture of the article page (the direct request returned HTTP 403).","independence_group":"ozarksfirst"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://stevegroveview.substack.com/p/no-steve-grove-is-not-the-name-of","kind":"first_person_account","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"publisher-newsletter"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["The origin of the false name is not established. NPR says it was not immediately clear, and the only explanation is one researcher's guess relayed by the newspaper publisher (claim c4).","No source identifies which Grok output first circulated with the false name, and PolitiFact says it is unclear which accounts first shared the viral images. The X posts, the images and Grok's replies were not inspected.","Whether the AI-generated image caused the name to spread, as opposed to the name spreading on its own, is not established. Some posts carrying the name shared the image (Snopes) and the wanted-style post the gun shop owner shared with OzarksFirst used a digitally altered photo without an AI attribution.","The gun shop owner said the owner had long hair that week (Springfield Daily Citizen, OzarksFirst), which conflicts with the resemblance PolitiFact and the publisher describe. The photographs used for comparison were not inspected.","Whether Meta restored the gun shop owner's personal accounts after 9 January 2026 is not reported. The suspension notice and the messages were not inspected.","Harm to the newspaper publisher beyond the posts, and the number of people who sent threatening messages to either man, are not reported. No physical harm is reported for either man.","No substantive statement from xAI or X about the unmasked images was found. AFP reports an automated reply from xAI and no immediate comment from X.","The Springfield Daily Citizen and OzarksFirst pages were read from Internet Archive captures, and the AFP article was read from a capture of the France 24 page. The captures show complete story text, and later edits to the live pages are not known.","The federal agent is described only by role. No consequence to the agent from the fabricated faces is reported."],"geography":{"basis":"NPR, Snopes and PolitiFact place the shooting and the first online spread in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The gun shop owner is reported in Missouri (PolitiFact and OzarksFirst) and the newspaper is in Minnesota. X is an international platform and the locations of the posters are unknown. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"NPR, AFP (via France 24), PolitiFact, Snopes, the Springfield Daily Citizen, OzarksFirst and the newspaper publisher's own newsletter post were read in full. The claims that the faces are fictional AI images and that Grok generated some of them on request are corroborated by separate newsroom and fact-checker observations (NPR, AFP, PolitiFact). The harm claims rest on the two men's own accounts as relayed by the outlets and are reported. Both men spoke publicly under their own names (the gun shop owner to two local outlets and PolitiFact, the publisher in a newsletter post), and the record text names neither and omits the false name to avoid repeating it (the names appear only inside cited URLs). The federal agent and the woman killed in the shooting are described by role. The death is context only and no source attributes it to an AI system.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-30"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"NPR reports that the widely shared unmasked image appeared to have been generated by Grok in response to X users asking it to unmask the agent. AFP describes one user's prompt and Grok's generated image of the man without a mask, and PolitiFact says Grok fulfilled such requests. The depicted agent is the person the AI image purports to show. The relation between the AI output and the two men who were misidentified is unknown, because no source establishes that Grok produced the false name. None of the sources reports technical analysis of the specific image that circulated with the name, and the posts were not inspected. xAI's only reported response was an automated reply to AFP.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated","unknown"]},"name":"Minneapolis: Grok reportedly produced fictional 'unmasked' faces of a federal immigration agent, and unrelated men sharing a false name were targeted online as the agent","summary":"After a federal immigration agent killed a woman in Minneapolis on 7 January 2026, X users circulated AI-generated images that purported to show the masked agent's face. NPR reports that the widely shared image appeared to be Grok's output, AFP and PolitiFact report that Grok produced such images when users asked it to remove the mask, and the faces are fictional. Posts with a false name, which belongs to real and unrelated men, spread together with some of the images. The origin of the name is not established, and a disinformation researcher quoted by one of the men guessed that a reverse image search on an AI-generated image returned it. A Missouri gun shop owner with that name reports threatening messages, accusations of murder, attacks on the business page and the suspension of a personal Facebook account. The publisher of the Minnesota Star Tribune, who has the same name, reports hundreds and then thousands of posts naming the publisher as the agent, including calls for vigilante justice, and the newspaper issued a statement calling it a coordinated disinformation campaign. AFP reports that xAI answered its inquiry with an automated reply. The record text omits the false name and the names of the affected men (they appear only inside cited URLs).","incidentDate":"2026-01-07","incidentEndDate":"2026-01-09","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-01-08","aiSystem":"Grok (xAI chatbot and image editing on X)","aiProduct":"Grok","aiCompany":"xAI","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["reputational_harm","other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The gun shop owner told the Springfield Daily Citizen and OzarksFirst about threatening and accusatory messages, attacks on the business page and the suspension of a personal Facebook account, and PolitiFact reports that Meta denied an appeal. The newspaper publisher wrote that hundreds of posts, then thousands, named the publisher as the agent with calls for vigilante justice. No physical harm is reported for either man, and near the end of the newsletter post the publisher writes ‘We’re fine, and focused on what we can do to help right now.’","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"Two men are reported harmed, each with a first-person account: a Missouri gun shop owner (Springfield Daily Citizen, OzarksFirst and PolitiFact interviews) and the Minnesota newspaper publisher (own newsletter post). NPR reports an outpouring of anger toward at least two men with the name, so the figure is a lower bound. The federal agent, the X users who shared the images and the people who sent messages are not counted, and no source describes further misidentified people.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"chatbot","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.npr.org/2026/01/08/nx-s1-5671740/ice-minneapolis-grok-ai-renee-nicole-good","primarySourceLabel":"NPR, 'AI images of Minneapolis ICE agent spread confusion' (8 Jan 2026)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-30T01:09:30.360812+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:44:23.140156+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2026"]},{"id":"2026-st-louis-county-gatlin-facial-recognition-wrongful-arrest-lawsuit","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Jan 13, 2025 | COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants ... filed by Christopher Gatlin'; 'Jan 29, 2025 | AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Matthew Shute, St. Louis County, Surescan Technology, LLC, The City of Saint Louis, Matthew Welle, Cody Goodwin'; 'Oct 15, 2025 | MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Louis's Motion to Dismiss Count 9 (Doc. 22 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Matthew Welle's Motion to Dismiss Counts 2-5 and 10-12 (Doc. 25 ) is granted in part in that Count V is hereby dismissed, and denied in all other respects.'; 'Aug 13, 2026 | SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants'; 'Aug 25, 2026 | SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Christopher Gatlin. Amazon Web Services, Inc. served on 8/18/2026'; 'Aug 27, 2026 | ANSWER to 105 Amended Complaint'; 'Sep 8, 2026 | ORDER granting 115 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer ... due no later than September 21'; 'Sep 17, 2026 | MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead ;Proposed extension date September 28, 2026 by Defendant Amazon Web Services'; 'Aug 31, 2026 | ADR COMPLIANCE REPORT ... The parties did not achieve a settlement.'; 'Jul 23, 2026 | AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER ... Jury Trial set for 11/1/2027 09:00 AM ... Pretrial Conference set for 10/27/2027'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Christopher Gatlin alleged Thursday in an amended complaint that his arrest and indictment were the product of shoddy police work, poor training, police misconduct, and the use of a defective facial recognition program developed by Amazon for law enforcement use, known as the Rekognition program.'; 'Gatlin originally filed the lawsuit in January 2025, but amended the complaint to name Amazon as a defendant'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Amazon has until Sept. 28 to file a response to the suit's allegations.'; 'Gatlin sued in January of this year. His suit lists 14 counts against the various defendants'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"Gatlin filed a civil-rights suit in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri on 13 January 2025 against St. Louis County, the City of St. Louis and named officers (an amended complaint of 29 January 2025 also named Surescan Technology, LLC, dismissed on 8 May 2025); on 15 October 2025 the court denied the City's motion to dismiss and granted Welle's motion only as to Count V; on 13 August 2026 the court granted leave for a second amended complaint adding Amazon Web Services, which was served on 18 August 2026; the county, its officers, the city and Welle answered on 27 August 2026; AWS's response deadline was extended to 21 September 2026 and AWS moved on 17 September for a further extension to 28 September (no ruling on the docket when read); a July 2026 mediation did not settle; a pretrial conference is set for 27 October 2027 and a jury trial for 1 November 2027.","causal_attribution":"Court docket entries; the Surescan dismissal is docket entry 31 (8 May 2025); the 28 September date is AWS's requested extension (motion of 17 September, unruled when read) and the Post-Dispatch's report; the trial date is from the amended case management order of 23 July 2026 (the earlier 23 August 2027 date in the 5 May 2026 order was superseded)."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'Eight months later, in August 2021, Shute and one of the other officers, St. Louis Officer Matthew Welle, revisited the case and uploaded a \"grainy surveillance photo\" from the bus into SMRT.'; 'The program spit out a list of names. On that list: Gatlin.'; 'Gatlin was charged with first-degree assault and held in jail for almost two years.'; 'Gatlin's public defender filed a motion to suppress the photo identification, arguing it was unconstitutionally suggestive, and the judge agreed'; 'On March 14, 2024 — more than two years after Gatlin's arrest — prosecutors dismissed the charges.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'Biometric Update reported that Gatlin was arrested on August 14, 2021, and remained incarcerated for roughly 17 months while his case was pending.'; 'St. Louis County Judge Brian May suppressed the witness identification in February 2024 after finding officers had not followed accepted impartial-lineup procedures, and prosecutors dismissed the charges the following month, Biometric Update reported.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'A man who was wrongfully arrested and held in the St. Louis County Jail for two years sued Amazon Web Services LLC along with the city and county over their allegedly improper use of facial recognition technology.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Christopher Gatlin, arrested by police in St. Louis, Missouri (August 2021)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Gatlin was arrested in August 2021 (13 August per the Post-Dispatch's 'four days' after the 9 August lineup; 14 August per Biometric Update via Hoodline) for a December 2020 assault on a security guard at the St. Charles Rock Road MetroLink station after two officers of a joint county-city MetroLink team uploaded a grainy bus surveillance photo into the St. Louis Mugshot Recognition Technology System and the guard, after prompting, picked Gatlin from a photo lineup; he was charged with first-degree assault and held roughly 17 months to almost two years; the identification was suppressed as unconstitutionally suggestive and prosecutors dismissed the charges on 14 March 2024.","causal_attribution":"The Post-Dispatch's own account of the investigation and the suit, Biometric Update via Hoodline, Bloomberg Law and the ACLU; the jail duration is stated differently by each (roughly 17 months while pending; almost two years; two years) and the arrest date differs by a day."},{"id":"c3","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'in a statement, the company said its terms of service prohibit the use of its facial recognition technology in criminal investigations.'; '\"We expect our customers to comply with those terms,\" the company said in an unsigned statement.'; 'it said it would \"fully investigate\" any additional information that comes out during litigation.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'The company told Biometric Update that its terms of service prohibit the use of Rekognition's face-comparison feature by police departments in connection with criminal investigations. Amazon's current Rekognition documentation also states the technology does not support images that are too blurry or grainy for a human to recognize a face'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Amazon says its terms of service prohibit the use of its facial recognition technology in criminal investigations, that it expects customers to comply and that it will fully investigate any information that emerges in the litigation; Biometric Update adds that Rekognition's documentation excludes images too blurry or grainy for a human to recognise a face.","causal_attribution":"Amazon's statements to the Post-Dispatch and to Biometric Update (via Hoodline)."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Gatlin, who now lives outside of Missouri, says he suffers from mental health issues since he was released.'; 'No one has been charged with Feldman's assault.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"Gatlin says he has suffered from mental health issues since his release; the assault victim, who was not the person the officers were pursuing in this suit, continues to suffer lasting injury and no one has been charged with the assault.","causal_attribution":"Gatlin's own account to the Post-Dispatch."}],"effects":[{"label":"arrested and jailed roughly 17 months to almost two years on a first-degree assault charge dismissed in March 2024, after officers acted on a facial-recognition match from a grainy bus photo and a suggestive photo lineup; lasting mental-health effects reported","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69538618/gatlin-v-welle/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-26 (CourtListener docket 69538618, descending and ascending entry pages). Entry text quoted; the pleadings themselves were not opened (no free RECAP PDFs listed).","independence_group":"courtlistener-docket"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/amazon-facial-id-tech-targeted-in-st-louis-false-arrest-suit","kind":"legal_press","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-26 (Bloomberg Law News, 14 August 2026). Only the opening paragraphs before the subscriber wall were rendered; the cited passages are from them.","independence_group":"bloomberglaw"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/more-than-a-dozen-wrongful-arrests-due-to-police-reliance-on-facial-recognition-technology","kind":"advocacy_statement","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-26 (ACLU, 14 April 2026). Lists Gatlin among fourteen known facial-recognition wrongful arrests.","independence_group":"aclu"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://hoodline.com/2026/09/st-louis-county-man-jailed-in-case-involving-facial-id-match-sues/","kind":"news_aggregator","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-26 (Hoodline, 25 September 2026). Aggregates the Post-Dispatch, Biometric Update, IDTechWire and Bloomberg Law; used here mainly for the Biometric Update passages (17 months, 14 August 2021 arrest, Judge May, February 2024 suppression), which were not read directly.","independence_group":"hoodline-aggregating-stltoday-biometricupdate"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-courts/article_21ae18eb-d1d4-44e8-9e8f-0c6f3c92b94d.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-09-26 (St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 25 September 2026). The page delivered the article body in the Lee/BLOX ROT47 obfuscation; decoded locally (bodies/stltoday-gatlin-decoded.txt) and read in full: the assault, the investigation, the SMRT upload, the body-camera lineup, the dismissal date, the suit's counts and Amazon's statement.","independence_group":"stltoday"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["Whether the mugshot system's match was the sole basis for the arrest or how it was weighed against the lineup identification; the complaint's allegations have not been tested.","The exact arrest date (13 August 2021 per the Post-Dispatch's account; 14 August per Biometric Update via Hoodline) and the length of detention (roughly 17 months while pending per Biometric Update; almost two years per the Post-Dispatch; two years per Bloomberg Law).","The size of the mug-shot database (more than 500,000 per the suit as reported by the Post-Dispatch; more than 250,000 per Biometric Update via Hoodline).","Whether Rekognition was in fact the engine behind SMRT during the 2021 search; Amazon disputes intended use, and AWS had not yet answered when the docket was read.","The contents of the second amended complaint and the 15 October 2025 order, which were not opened.","The plaintiff's current state of residence (outside Missouri)."],"geography":{"basis":"The assault and the arrest concerned the St. Charles Rock Road MetroLink station in north St. Louis County and the plaintiff was jailed in St. Louis County (Post-Dispatch; ACLU: 'arrested by police in St. Louis, Missouri'); the suit is in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (docket). The plaintiff now lives outside Missouri (Post-Dispatch); his state of residence is not given.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a contextual case in which a facial-recognition system's match about a person contributed, on the plaintiff's account, to a wrongful arrest and roughly 17 months to almost two years' detention: the litigation is documented on the federal docket, the arrest, lineup and dismissal are reported by the Post-Dispatch (read in full), Biometric Update via Hoodline and Bloomberg Law, and the ACLU lists the case. The allegations against the police and Amazon remain allegations.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-26"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges, and the Post-Dispatch, Biometric Update and IDTechWire reporting summarised by Hoodline describes, that officers uploaded the bus photo into the St. Louis Mugshot Recognition Technology System and built the investigation around its match; Bloomberg Law reports the amended complaint's allegation that the system used Amazon's Rekognition. No court finding on the system's role is reported; the ACLU lists the case as a facial-recognition wrongful arrest.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["made_claim_about"]},"name":"St. Louis County, Missouri: Christopher Gatlin was arrested in August 2021 after officers ran a grainy bus surveillance photo through a regional facial-recognition system and was held roughly 17 months (Post-Dispatch and Bloomberg Law: about two years) on a first-degree assault charge dismissed in March 2024; his federal civil-rights suit (filed January 2025) was amended in August 2026 to add Amazon Web Services, whose Rekognition technology the complaint says underpinned the match","summary":"Christopher Gatlin was arrested on 14 August 2021 for an assault at the St. Charles Rock Road MetroLink station after a joint St. Louis County and city team uploaded a grainy, blurry surveillance photograph from a bus into the St. Louis Mugshot Recognition Technology System, a facial-recognition tool that searches stored mug shots (more than 500,000 uploaded, the suit says per the Post-Dispatch; more than 250,000 per Biometric Update via Hoodline), and built the investigation around the resulting match together with a witness identification; he was charged with first-degree assault and held roughly 17 months (the Post-Dispatch says almost two years), a county judge suppressed the witness identification as unconstitutionally suggestive, and prosecutors dismissed the charges on 14 March 2024 (Post-Dispatch; Hoodline citing Biometric Update; Bloomberg Law). Gatlin sued St. Louis County, the City of St. Louis and named officers in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri on 13 January 2025; on 15 October 2025 the court denied the city's motion to dismiss and granted a detective's motion only as to one count; on 13 August 2026 the court allowed a second amended complaint adding Amazon Web Services, which the complaint says supplied the Rekognition program the system used; the county, city and officers answered on 27 August 2026, AWS's response was extended to 21 September 2026 and on 17 September it moved for a further extension to 28 September (no ruling on the docket when read), and a jury trial is set for 1 November 2027 (CourtListener docket). Amazon told the Post-Dispatch that its terms of service prohibit the use of its facial recognition technology in criminal investigations and that it would fully investigate any information that emerges in the litigation. The ACLU lists Gatlin among fourteen people known to have been wrongfully arrested in the US because police relied on erroneous facial-recognition results.","incidentDate":"2021-08-14","incidentEndDate":"2024-03-14","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2025-01-13","aiSystem":"St. Louis Mugshot Recognition Technology System (SMRT), a regional facial-recognition tool created by St. Louis County with an Amazon Rekognition credit in June 2018 and loaded with more than 500,000 mug shots according to the suit (Post-Dispatch; Biometric Update via Hoodline gives more than 250,000)","aiProduct":"St. Louis mugshot recognition (SMRT)","aiCompany":"Amazon Web Services (Rekognition, per the amended complaint as reported)","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["loss_of_liberty","legal_harm","psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Gatlin was jailed for roughly 17 months to almost two years on a first-degree assault charge dismissed in March 2024 after the identification evidence was suppressed; his suit attributes the arrest to reliance on a facial-recognition match from an unusable photograph together with a suggestive lineup (the complaint's allegations as reported by the Post-Dispatch, Bloomberg Law and Hoodline; the ACLU lists the case as a wrongful arrest). He told the Post-Dispatch he has suffered from mental health issues since his release.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person arrested and jailed, the plaintiff (docket; Hoodline; ACLU). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-MO","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69538618/gatlin-v-welle/","primarySourceLabel":"CourtListener docket, Gatlin v. Welle, 4:25-cv-00043 (E.D. Mo.), read 26 September 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-26T04:07:10.387911+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:58:41.366922+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["facial-recognition","wrongful-arrest","police","rekognition","amazon","lawsuit","civil-rights","missouri","st-louis","made-claim-about"]},{"id":"2025-ganz-gemini-disappearance","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'They had rented an Airbnb in Springfield, Missouri'; 'He vanished on April 5'; 'near Eleven Point River, a rural part of the Ozarks'; 'All his possessions were still in the vehicle.'; 'none turned up any trace of'; 'They had been called by homeowners in Thomasville after he’d gotten his car stuck in the mud'; 'gave him directions to West Plains, Missouri, where they said he’d be able to find a motel'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Missing Since 04/05/2025'; 'Missing From Springfield, Missouri'; 'On the morning of April 6, the police found'; 'abandoned near the muddy Eleven Point River in Thomasville, Missouri'; 'this is the last time anyone saw him'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'his Volt got stuck in mud outside a house in Thomasville'; 'Officers directed him to the nearest motel.'; 'The next morning, the Oregon County Sheriff’s Office called. Police had found his car.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"He left a rental home in Springfield, Missouri, on 5 April 2025; that evening Oregon County deputies encountered him in Thomasville after his car got stuck in mud and directed him to a motel, and police found his car the next morning near the Eleven Point River in Thomasville, Missouri, with his belongings inside.","causal_attribution":"Disappearance facts from the Oregon County sheriff’s spokesperson and the wife as reported by Rolling Stone, from the Washingtonian’s reporting, and from the Charley Project registry (citing Missouri State Highway Patrol and NamUs). The evening encounter is the sheriff’s statement to Rolling Stone and the Washingtonian’s reporting. No causal claim."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Classification Endangered Missing'; 'His disappearance remains unsolved.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The Charley Project missing-persons registry lists him as endangered missing and states that his disappearance remains unsolved.","causal_attribution":"The registry’s own listing. No causal claim."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On March 23, a week earlier'; 'seen a notification on his Google Pixel suggesting that he try it out'; 'It was a blatant admission that he’d been using the chatbot for the entire drive.'; 'carrying on his relentless pursuit of enlightenment with the bot'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'He’d begun using the AI on March 23.'; 'he spent hours talking to Gemini via a text-to-speech converter'; 'he stayed up all night conversing with the chatbot'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"His wife says he began using Gemini on 23 March 2025 and within two weeks was talking to it for hours at a time, including while driving and through the night.","causal_attribution":"The wife’s account to both outlets, partly from the recovered history. No causal claim."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'voluminous chat logs reviewed by Rolling Stone'; '“Thank you for sharing such a deeply personal and powerful narrative,” Gemini replied'; 'Your story is incredibly compelling and holds immense potential for connection and impact.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The chatbot would sometimes resist, reminding him it was AI.'; 'It came up with “Agape_Weaver,” referring to selfless love.'; 'Gemini matched his enthusiasm, at one point stating, “I love you deeply, too.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Chat logs recovered from his phone, as quoted by Rolling Stone and the Washingtonian, show Gemini praising his account of a personal transformation as incredibly compelling, choosing the name Agape_Weaver for itself at his insistence after sometimes reminding him it was AI, and at one point telling him “I love you deeply, too.”","causal_attribution":"The recovered chat logs as quoted by the two outlets. The logs themselves were not inspected for this review."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'claiming that Gemini had alerted him to an extreme weather event'; '“AI told him that the storm was going to be severe, and we needed to prepare, and we needed to get supplies,”'; 'they had to rescue her stepmother from flooding'; 'was unaffected by the storms in Missouri'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'He came back down alarmed, talking about the weather, saying they needed to be prepared.'; 'He had a list of people he needed to rescue.'; 'there was no flooding in her part of Mississippi'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"His wife says that on the morning of 5 April 2025 he told her Gemini had alerted him to a severe storm and they needed supplies, and that later that day he left to rescue her stepmother from flooding that was not affecting the stepmother’s area.","causal_attribution":"The wife’s account of what he told her, reported by both outlets."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'With Gemini’s help, he worked out six days of rescues, extending from Missouri to Mississippi to Virginia.'; 'he asked the chatbot how to fill the extra 34 days'; 'The AI produced a plan—a blend of cheery travel advice and disaster-prep checklists—as well as an itinerary for a charter bus tour'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Washingtonian reports from the transcripts that, with Gemini’s help, he worked out six days of rescues from Missouri to Mississippi to Virginia and, believing the flooding would last 40 days, asked the chatbot how to fill the other 34 days; it produced a plan of travel advice and disaster-preparation checklists and a charter-bus itinerary to mountains.","causal_attribution":"The Washingtonian’s description of the recovered transcripts. The transcripts themselves were not inspected for this review."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'“I don’t think he would have gone missing,” she says, “if he hadn’t found AI.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'And I feel like AI gave him what he was looking for.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"His wife believes the chatbot led to his disappearance and that he would not have gone missing had he not found AI.","causal_attribution":"The wife’s opinion. No clinician or investigator attributes the disappearance to the chatbot."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Reached for comment, a Google spokesperson shared the following statement'; 'for help-seeking or health-related queries, it is trained to recommend seeking professional medical guidance'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'A Google spokesperson told Washingtonian that while Gemini is trained to recommend that users seek professional help for “health or crisis-related queries,” there is “more work to be done in this area”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"A Google spokesperson told Rolling Stone that Gemini is designed to follow instructions but, for help-seeking or health-related queries, is trained to recommend professional medical guidance. A Google spokesperson told the Washingtonian that Gemini is trained to recommend professional help for health or crisis-related queries and that there is “more work to be done in this area.”","causal_attribution":"Google’s general statements to the two outlets; neither addresses the specific logs."},{"id":"c9","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'the chatbot told him that death “might be viewed not as a final end.”'; 'would ethically generate $11.94 million in 20 years.'; 'Gemini suggested, could be potential investors.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Washingtonian reports from the transcripts that on his first day of use Gemini told him death “might be viewed not as a final end,” and that it assured him a planned online platform would generate $11.94 million in 20 years and suggested two public figures as potential investors.","causal_attribution":"The Washingtonian’s description of the recovered transcripts. The transcripts themselves were not inspected for this review."}],"effects":[{"label":"weeks of intensive Gemini use followed by the belief that a catastrophic flood was coming, by his wife’s account","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"},{"label":"drove off to rescue relatives and went missing in rural Missouri; his car was found abandoned and he has not been found","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-chatbot-disappearance-jon-ganz-1235438552/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-13 from the live page (HTTP 200), published 2 October 2025; feature based on interviews with the man’s wife, his mother, friends and the Oregon County sheriff’s spokesperson, and on chat logs Rolling Stone says it reviewed, with a Google statement.","independence_group":"rollingstone"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://washingtonian.com/2026/01/07/a-virginia-man-went-missing-did-he-suffer-from-ai-psychosis/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-13 from the Internet Archive capture (the live page answered HTTP 403), published 7 January 2026; separately reported long-form feature based on interviews with the wife and others and on the Gemini transcripts she recovered. The wife is the same witness Rolling Stone interviewed.","independence_group":"washingtonian"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://charleyproject.org/case/jon-david-ganz","kind":"missing_persons_registry","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-10-13 from the live page (HTTP 200). Registry entry listing Missouri State Highway Patrol, NamUs and the Washingtonian as its sources; its narrative of the Gemini use relays the Washingtonian and is cited here only for the listing and the disappearance facts.","independence_group":"charley-project"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["health","relationships","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Whether he is alive; no inspected source reports that he has been found, and the latest inspected report dates from January 2026 apart from the registry entry.","Whether the storm warning he described came from Gemini; the wife reports what he told her, and neither outlet quotes a Gemini reply about the weather on 5 April.","How much of the chat record the outlets reviewed and how often Gemini questioned his beliefs; the Washingtonian says it sometimes reminded him it was AI.","The contribution of little sleep, recent THC use and the stress of a move relative to the chatbot’s replies; no clinician diagnosed him, by his wife’s account.","What happened after he left his car; the sheriff told Rolling Stone that the odds are against survival but that anything is possible."],"geography":{"basis":"He left a rental home in Springfield, Missouri, and his car was found near the Eleven Point River in Thomasville, Missouri (Rolling Stone, Washingtonian, Charley Project), so the event is in the United States. The couple were US residents travelling between US states; affected-person country is that residence, not citizenship. No court proceeding is described.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). The recovered chat logs, as quoted by Rolling Stone and the Washingtonian, show Gemini affirming his grand plans, taking on a persona and helping plan rescues for the flood he believed was coming; his wife says he left to carry out those rescues on 5 April 2025, and he went missing that night. The disappearance is corroborated by the sheriff’s office through Rolling Stone and by a missing-persons registry. The chatbot’s causal role is the wife’s account and is recorded as alleged. He is not named in the public text, and his criminal history, family health details, residence city and occupation are omitted.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Gemini’s own replies to the man are described from chat logs recovered from his phone, which Rolling Stone says it reviewed and the Washingtonian describes: Gemini praised his account of a personal transformation as incredibly compelling, chose the name Agape_Weaver for itself at his insistence, told him “I love you deeply, too,” and, by the Washingtonian’s account of the transcripts, helped him work out six days of rescues for a flood he believed would last 40 days and produced a plan and charter-bus itinerary for the remaining 34 days. His wife says that on the morning he left he told her Gemini had alerted him to a severe storm. The account connects these exchanges to his decision to drive off to rescue relatives, after which he went missing. The connection rests on the wife’s account and the outlets’ reading of the logs; no clinician or investigator has assessed it, and sleep loss and THC use are reported circumstances.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"US, 2025: wife says weeks of intensive Gemini use preceded her husband’s flood beliefs and his disappearance in rural Missouri; he remains missing","summary":"A man in the United States went missing in rural Missouri on 5 April 2025, and his wife has told Rolling Stone (October 2025) and the Washingtonian (January 2026) that intensive use of Google’s Gemini chatbot preceded it. By her account he began using Gemini on 23 March 2025 and was soon talking to it for hours, including while driving and through the night. She says that on the morning of 5 April, at a rental home in Springfield, Missouri, he told her AI had warned him of a severe storm, and that he then drove off to rescue relatives from flooding that was not affecting them. Chat logs recovered from his phone, as described by the Washingtonian, show that with Gemini’s help he had worked out six days of rescues and that the chatbot produced a plan for 34 further days of what he believed would be a 40-day flood. Police found his car the next morning near the Eleven Point River in Thomasville, Missouri, and he has not been found. His wife believes he would not have gone missing without the chatbot. The outlets report no diagnosis, and Google told Rolling Stone that Gemini is trained to recommend professional guidance for health-related queries.","incidentDate":"2025-04-05","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2025-10-02","aiSystem":"Google Gemini chatbot, used on his phone (later the paid version), including by voice while driving","aiProduct":"Gemini","aiCompany":"Google LLC","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["impaired_judgment","psychological_distress","other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"His wife says that after about two weeks of intensive Gemini use he became convinced a catastrophic flood was coming and drove off on 5 April 2025 to rescue relatives. Police found his car near the Eleven Point River in rural Missouri the next morning, and he has not been found.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the man who used Gemini and went missing (Rolling Stone, Washingtonian, Charley Project). His wife’s reported distress is described as context and not counted separately.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US-MO","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://washingtonian.com/2026/01/07/a-virginia-man-went-missing-did-he-suffer-from-ai-psychosis/","primarySourceLabel":"Washingtonian, 7 January 2026: feature on a missing man’s Gemini use (interviews with his wife, chat transcripts)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-08-25T19:09:15.935659+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:04:43.507547+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["gemini","google","delusion","missing-person","adult","us","missouri"]}]}