{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-04T08:04:37.283Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"misinformation","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"unknown","evidence":"","year":"","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":2,"coverage":{"cases":2,"countries":2,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":0,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":1,"minors":0,"coreRelations":0,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":2,"relationPending":1,"relationUnknown":1},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-ujjain-shahi-masjid-ai-demolition-videos-crowd-clash-detentions","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Police and security personnel deployed around the mosque faced stone-pelting, following which tear gas shells and a lathi charge were used to disperse the crowd'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'police used tear gas and mild force to disperse protesters who allegedly hurled stones'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"On 28 September 2026, as a portion of the Shahi Masjid in Ujjain was being removed for a road-widening project, a crowd clashed with police; stones were allegedly thrown at security personnel, and police used tear gas and a lathi charge to disperse the crowd.","causal_attribution":"Police accounts of the clash as reported by the outlets."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'पुलिस का कहना है कि इन फर्जी वीडियो में मस्जिद को पूरी तरह गिराते हुए दिखाया गया'; 'उज्जैन एसपी प्रदीप शर्मा के मुताबिक, सोशल मीडिया पर AI से बनाए गए वीडियो और भड़काऊ पोस्ट ने बड़ी भीड़ जुटाने में भूमिका निभाई'; 'इन वीडियो और दूसरे भड़काऊ पोस्ट के फैलने के बाद बड़ी भीड़ मस्जिद के बाहर जुटी और बाद में पुलिस के साथ झड़प हो गई'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'खुलासा किया है कि मस्जिद के पास बुलडोजर होने वाले फोटो-वीडियो एआई से बनाए गए थे'; 'ऐसे कई फोटो-वीडियो मिले हैं, जिनमें जेसीबी को एड किया गया है'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'AI-generated videos showing the entire Shahi Masjid in Ujjain being demolished helped fuel rumours and mobilise a crowd before clashes broke out at the site on September 28'; 'One of the clips reportedly showed a JCB demolishing the entire mosque'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"Ujjain police said that videos made with AI, showing the whole mosque being demolished, and other provocative posts circulated on social media and helped draw the large crowd that later clashed with police; only part of the mosque was being removed.","causal_attribution":"Police attribution, carried by several outlets that all rely on the police account. The videos were not inspected for this review and no outlet reports how the AI attribution was made; the police also blame other posts and a faction of the mosque committee for mobilising the crowd."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'So far, 15 people have been taken into custody and an FIR has been registered against seven people. Social media content creators are also among them'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'The police arrested 15 persons and filed eight FIRs across three police stations'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'पुलिस ने अब तक 15 लोगों को हिरासत में लिया है, जबकि कुछ लोगों की गिरफ्तारी भी हुई है'; 'पुलिस ने तीन थानों में 8 FIR दर्ज की हैं, जिनमें 20 लोगों को आरोपी बनाया गया है'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'पुलिस ने आठ केस दर्ज किए हैं'; '15 आरोपितों को पुलिस ने हिरासत में लिया है'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'Some people have been arrested and 15 others detained, while a case has been registered against seven people'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"Police said 15 people had been taken into custody after the clash and that social media content creators were among those named in an FIR; reports put the total at eight FIRs at three police stations. Aaj Tak and The New Indian Express report that some further people were arrested in addition to the 15, without giving a number.","causal_attribution":"Police figures; the counts of accused differ between outlets (20 in Aaj Tak, more than 30 in Jagran)."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'इस तरह की अफवाहें फैलाने वाले 5 इन्फ्लुएंसरों के खिलाफ FIR भी दर्ज की है'; 'कुल 100 से ज्यादा कंटेंट को डाउन कराया है'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'एआई की मदद से मनगढ़ंत वीडियो और आपत्तिजनक कंटेंट तैयार कर प्रसारित करने पर भी चार युवकों पर अलग से केस दर्ज किया है'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'Five social media influencers, all residents of Ujjain, have been booked by the police'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Police registered a case against social media influencers accused of making or circulating the fabricated videos (five influencers according to Live Hindustan and The Indian Express, Jagran counts four youths, in a case registered separately from the eight cases over the clash, and the accounts it names overlap with Live Hindustan's five), and said more than 100 pieces of content had been taken down.","causal_attribution":"Police allegations against the accused; no court has ruled."},{"id":"c5","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"'Six policemen were injured and given primary treatment'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"'sustained an injury to her hand while attempting to stop a group of women'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'The SP said no one was injured in the incident'","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"Reports conflict on whether police officers were injured in the clash: the Free Press Journal reported police saying six policemen were injured and given primary treatment, and The New Indian Express reported an inspector injured in the hand, but also reported the SP saying no one was injured.","causal_attribution":"Conflicting reports; injuries arose from the clash, and the reported link to the videos is the police attribution in c2."}],"effects":[{"label":"a crowd that police say was drawn partly by AI-made videos of the mosque being demolished clashed with police and was dispersed with tear gas and a lathi charge","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"15 people taken into custody and FIRs registered after the clash","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"police officers reported injured, though the SP was also reported saying no one was hurt","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.aajtak.in/madhya-pradesh/story/ujjain-shahi-masjid-ai-video-clashes-police-road-widening-project-ntc-mnrd-smsr-2656003-2026-09-29","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"hi","translation_note":"Read in Hindi on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Researcher translation. Reports remarks by Ujjain SP Pradeep Sharma; the remarks themselves were not heard.","independence_group":"aaj-tak-ujjain-police"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.livehindustan.com/madhya-pradesh/ujjain-shahi-masjid-ai-jcb-fake-video-5-influencers-fir-201790680304218.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"hi","translation_note":"Read in Hindi on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Researcher translation. Quotes SP Pradeep Sharma speaking to the media.","independence_group":"live-hindustan-ujjain-police"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.jagran.com/madhya-pradesh/indore-ujjain-shahi-masjid-row-fir-against-ai-misinformation-spreaders-40388941.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"hi","translation_note":"Read in Hindi on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Researcher translation. Attributes the FIR details to police.","independence_group":"jagran-ujjain-police"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ujjain-violence-shahi-masjid-madhya-pradesh-police-local-influencers-rumour-10898869/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-04 from an Internet Archive capture (direct fetch HTTP 403). Article dated 29 September 2026; relays police statements and the FIR.","independence_group":"indian-express"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ujjain-shahi-masjid-part-removed-police-social-media-crackdown-10897636/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-04 from an Internet Archive capture (direct fetch HTTP 403). Article dated 28 September 2026; quotes SP Pradeep Sharma.","independence_group":"indian-express"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.freepressjournal.in/indore/ujjain-shahi-masjid-clash-ai-video-showing-entire-mosque-demolition-fuelled-rumours-police-say","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Explicitly relays The Indian Express, so it shares that independence group.","independence_group":"indian-express"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/madhya-pradesh/2026/Sep/28/ujjain-on-edge-after-stone-pelting-on-cops-over-mosque-removal-drive-15-detained-7-booked","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Bhopal-datelined report of 28 September 2026.","independence_group":"new-indian-express"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/ujjain-tense-after-mosque-demolition-drive-10-booked-2500-police-deployed","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-04 (HTTP 200). Attributes the injury figure to police; cites the Hindustan Times for background.","independence_group":"free-press-journal-2026-09-28"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["justice","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Who made the videos, with what tool, and when they were first posted.","How the police established that the videos were made with AI.","How many people were injured, given the conflicting reports.","Whether any of the people detained made or shared the videos, and the outcome of the FIRs."],"geography":{"basis":"The clash, detentions and FIRs took place in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, India (all sources). Where the videos were made is not reported. No court proceeding over the clash is reported; the High Court proceedings concerned the road widening.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["IN"],"affected_person_countries":["IN"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a case in which police attribute a crowd mobilisation and clash, followed by detentions and FIRs, partly to AI-made videos falsely showing a mosque being demolished. The AI link rests on police statements carried by several outlets. Private accused persons are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-04"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Ujjain SP Pradeep Sharma said videos made with AI, showing the whole Shahi Masjid being demolished by a JCB, circulated on social media and helped gather the crowd (Aaj Tak; Live Hindustan, which also reports photos; The Indian Express via the Free Press Journal). Live Hindustan's direct quotation of the SP speaks of morphed photos and a JCB added by editing, and its summary of his remarks attributes the added JCB to AI or editing. Jagran reports a police case over videos fabricated with AI. All of this is police attribution: the videos were not inspected for this review, no outlet describes how the AI attribution was made, and no tool is named. The videos depicted a building, and the people harmed (those detained and the officers reported injured) were not depicted, addressed or decided about by an AI system, so no listed person relation fits (unknown).","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"India: police in Ujjain said AI-made videos falsely showing the whole Shahi Masjid being demolished helped draw a crowd that clashed with police on 28 September 2026; 15 people were taken into custody and influencers were booked","summary":"On 28 September 2026, as part of Ujjain's Shahi Masjid was being removed for a road-widening project, a crowd clashed with police; stones were allegedly thrown at security personnel and police used tear gas and a lathi charge. Ujjain Superintendent of Police Pradeep Sharma said videos made with AI, showing the entire mosque being demolished, and other provocative posts on social media had helped gather the crowd. Police said 15 people were taken into custody and reports put the total at eight FIRs at three police stations; social media influencers were booked for spreading the videos, and police said more than 100 pieces of content were taken down. Reports conflict on injuries: one outlet reported police saying six policemen were hurt, another reported the SP saying no one was injured.","incidentDate":"2026-09-28","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-09-28","aiSystem":"Videos (and, per one report, photos) that Ujjain police say were made with AI, showing the whole Shahi Masjid being demolished by a JCB, shared on Instagram and Facebook; the tool and its user are not identified","aiProduct":"Unidentified image and video tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["loss_of_liberty","legal_harm","physical_injury"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A crowd that Ujjain police say was drawn partly by AI-made videos of the mosque being demolished clashed with police; 15 people were taken into custody and FIRs registered, and police officers were reported injured, though the SP was also reported saying no one was hurt (Aaj Tak; The Indian Express; The New Indian Express; Free Press Journal).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"Police say 15 people were taken into custody after the clash (The Indian Express; Aaj Tak; Jagran; The New Indian Express), and Jagran describes them as accused in the eight cases over stone-pelting, obstruction of government work, inciting the crowd, threats and disturbing public order. They are clash suspects; no source links any of them to making, sharing or seeing the AI videos, so they are not counted as people harmed by the videos. Some further unnumbered arrests are reported (Aaj Tak; The New Indian Express). Police officers reported injured are not counted because reports conflict (six per the Free Press Journal; none per the SP as reported by The New Indian Express). No reliable count of people harmed by the videos exists. Unquantified, numeric placeholders 0.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"IN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.aajtak.in/madhya-pradesh/story/ujjain-shahi-masjid-ai-video-clashes-police-road-widening-project-ntc-mnrd-smsr-2656003-2026-09-29","primarySourceLabel":"Aaj Tak, 29 September 2026: शाही मस्जिद गिराने के AI वीडियो से जुटी थी भीड़, उज्जैन के बवाल पर खुलासा","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-04T03:29:15.835694+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-04T03:29:15.835694+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-generated-video","misinformation","communal-tension","police","detentions","india","madhya-pradesh","hindi-language"]},{"id":"2025-riley-perplexity-cancer-treatment","metadataReview":{"version":1,"geography":{"basis":"Re-checked on 2026-10-01 against the son's first-person Substack essay, The Star's syndicated copy of the New York Times feature, the Newser summary and the Parade article (the New York Times original could not be read). The syndicated Times text places the affected person in Seattle during summer 2025, the period in which he was refusing the recommended leukaemia treatment and had sent his oncologist research he had done with artificial intelligence ('dying of cancer thousands of miles away in Seattle'). That passage supports event_countries=US for the treatment refusal and decline; where he used Perplexity, and where he died, are not stated beyond his own home. The same passage, the Newser summary ('a retired neuroscientist in Seattle') and the retained record support affected_person_countries=US. No lawsuit or other court proceeding is reported in any inspected source, so court_countries is empty. The son's home in Austin, Texas and a cited researcher's office in Ohio are locations of family members and correspondents, not of the affected person, and are not used. No country outside the US appears in any inspected source.","evidence":[{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"Seattle, Washington","location":"victim_description","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"existing_record","locator":"a 75-year-old retired neuroscientist in Seattle","location":"summary","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'who was – apparently – dying of cancer thousands of miles away in Seattle' and, as the next development, 'Joe had sent his oncologist research he had done with artificial intelligence, the apparent evidence for his decision to refuse the treatment'","location":"https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2026/04/14/he-warned-about-the-dangers-of-ai-if-only-his-father-had-listened","supports":["event_countries","affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]},{"kind":"source_body","locator":"'75-year-old Joe Riley, a retired neuroscientist in Seattle'","location":"https://www.newser.com/story/387286/he-warns-consumers-about-ai-his-dad-died-after-relying-on-it.html","supports":["affected_person_countries"],"countries":["US"]}],"court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"unresolved":["event_countries=US rests on the syndicated Times passage placing the affected person in Seattle during the summer 2025 treatment-refusal period; no inspected source says where he used Perplexity, and the place of death is described only as found during a police welfare check, without a location.","No court country: no lawsuit or other court proceeding is reported in any inspected source.","The New York Times original could not be read (live HTTP 403; Internet Archive offline or returning an error page on 2026-10-01); its language is not recorded from a read body.","The row's affected_count_evidence refers to 'The complaint', but no complaint or lawsuit exists in any inspected source; this is a row-correction lead outside this metadata pass."],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-01","source_reviews":[{"url":"https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/13/well/ai-chatbots-cancer.html","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-10-01 returned HTTP 403. Internet Archive: CDX returned HTTP 503 ('Temporarily Offline'); the 2026 capture request returned a 403 error page (425 bytes) and a retry timed out. Not read, so its language is not recorded here. The Star's copy of the same Times article was read instead.","access":"unavailable","language":null},{"url":"https://buildcognitiveresonance.substack.com/p/the-role-of-ai-in-the-death-of-my","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-01 (HTTP 200; html lang=en). English. Benjamin Riley's first-person essay of 5 Jan 2026: diagnoses, the Perplexity self-diagnosis report sent to the oncologist, the two cited researchers' replies and the delayed treatment. It names no city, state or country for his father's residence, treatment or death.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2026/04/14/he-warned-about-the-dangers-of-ai-if-only-his-father-had-listened","notes":"Read live on 2026-10-01 (HTTP 200; html lang=en). English. Syndicated copy of the New York Times feature by Teddy Rosenbluth, dated 14 Apr 2026 ('This article originally appeared in The New York Times'); same reporting chain as the Times original. Places the affected person in Seattle in summer 2025; names his oncologist's centre (Fred Hutch Cancer Center) without a city; describes the death only as found during a police welfare check and his condo, without a location. Related-story cards on the page were not used.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://www.newser.com/story/387286/he-warns-consumers-about-ai-his-dad-died-after-relying-on-it.html","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-10-01 returned HTTP 403. Read from the Internet Archive capture of 25 Sep 2026 (web.archive.org/web/20260925104927id_/...). The page declares no html lang attribute; the article text read is English. Summary of the Times report, same reporting chain; describes him as 'a retired neuroscientist in Seattle'. A related-story line mentioning another Seattle couple was not used.","access":"read","language":"en"},{"url":"https://parade.com/health/ai-medical-self-diagnosis-risks-joe-riley-story","notes":"Live fetch on 2026-10-01 returned HTTP 403. Read from the Internet Archive capture of 25 Sep 2026 (web.archive.org/web/20260925104927id_/...; html lang=en). English. Health-advice article that retells the Times report and quotes the son's essay; gives no location for the affected person or the events.","access":"read","language":"en"}]},"name":"Joseph Neal Riley - Perplexity Medical Misinformation and Delayed CLL Treatment Death","summary":"Joseph Neal Riley, a 75-year-old retired neuroscientist in Seattle, died in late 2025 after delaying recommended treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia for roughly a year. He used Perplexity AI to self-diagnose a rare complication (Richter's Transformation) that his doctors found no evidence for; the chatbot misquoted published research in ways that supported refusing Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab. His son, AI critic Benjamin Riley, documented the case in a first-person Substack essay and it was later featured by the New York Times.","incidentDate":"2025-12-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-01-05","aiSystem":"Perplexity","aiProduct":"Perplexity","aiCompany":"Perplexity AI","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["treatment_discouragement","delusion_reinforcement","psychological_manipulation"],"harmOutcomes":["death","medical_deterioration","treatment_disruption"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Joseph Neal Riley died after delaying recommended leukemia treatment for roughly a year while relying on a Perplexity-supported self-diagnosis that his physicians found unsupported.","frameworkFacets":["P1c","P1d","P3a","P3c","P3d","P5b","P5c"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint and reporting document one named participant who delayed treatment and died.","victimAgeRange":"elderly","jurisdiction":"US-WA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/13/well/ai-chatbots-cancer.html","primarySourceLabel":"The New York Times — 'He Warned About the Dangers of A.I. If Only His Father Had Listened'","firstPublishedAt":"2026-07-31T06:48:20.462175+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-01T02:54:29.64597+00:00","scopeVersion":"participant-v2","tags":["death","elderly","perplexity","medical-advice","treatment-discouragement","hallucination","media-coverage","us","us-wa"]}]}