{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-18T06:59:10.372Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"lawyer","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"unknown","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":4,"coverage":{"cases":4,"countries":2,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":4,"lawsuits":1,"regulatory":0,"minors":0,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":1,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":1},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-india-supreme-court-rebukes-lawyer-who-blamed-clients-for-filing-alleged-ai-generated-non-existent-judgments","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'On behalf of the appellants, a compilation of judgments was placed on record to which the respondents raised immediate serious objection.'; 'According to them, the compilation was replete with AI generated non-'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'According to them, the compilation was replete with AI generated non-existent judgments,\" the Court recorded.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"During the hearing, the respondents objected that a compilation of judgments placed on record for the appellants was replete with AI-generated non-existent judgments.","causal_attribution":"The judgment documents that the respondents made this objection. Whether the judgments were AI-generated or non-existent is the respondents' claim and is not found by the Court."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'appellants, facing the Court’s query, sought to shift'; 'the entire blame on the appellants while at the same time feigning ignorance of what the compilation contained.'; 'sought to take the blame on himself and prayed for forgiveness on behalf of the appellants.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The senior counsel appearing for the appellants subsequently accepted responsibility and sought forgiveness on their behalf.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"When questioned by the Court, the appellants' advocate-on-record sought to shift the entire blame onto the appellants while feigning ignorance of what the compilation contained; the appellants' senior counsel then took the blame on himself and prayed for forgiveness on their behalf.","causal_attribution":"Recorded by the Court in its judgment."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Exemplary costs were proposed to be imposed while coming down heavily on the appellants.'; 'It is for such reason that the order requiring payment of costs has been deleted by “no order as to costs”.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'However, it Court ultimately refrained from imposing costs after being informed of the death of the first appellant'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The Court proposed exemplary costs against the appellants over the incident and later deleted the direction to pay costs after being informed of the first appellant's death; it made no order as to costs.","causal_attribution":"Recorded by the Court in its judgment."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The judgment did not identify the allegedly fabricated decisions or record a separate finding that particular judgments had been generated using AI.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The judgment does not identify the allegedly fabricated decisions or record a separate finding that particular judgments were AI-generated.","causal_attribution":"Bar and Bench's reading of the judgment; consistent with paragraph 74, which records the objection as the respondents' claim."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'The Court dismissed both appeals, upheld the NCLT orders as affirmed by the NCLAT, and directed that the insolvency resolution processes concerning both companies proceed in accordance with law.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'this Court finds no merit in either of these appeals and are, therefore dismissed.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Court dismissed both appeals on their merits and upheld the insolvency proceedings against the two hotel-operating companies.","causal_attribution":"The merits outcome is unrelated to the compilation; recorded as context."}],"effects":[{"label":"advocate-on-record criticised in a Supreme Court judgment for shifting blame onto the clients over the disputed compilation","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"exemplary costs proposed against the appellants, later deleted","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://images.assettype.com/barandbench/2026-10-15/xlwz6h1p/Deepak_Raheja_Vs_Omkara.pdf","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full (50 pages, text extracted from the PDF); the AI incident is in paragraph 74.","independence_group":"india-supreme-court-judgment-15-oct-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/supreme-court-laments-lawyer-blaming-client-for-ai-generated-fake-judgments","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full. A report of the judgment, so it shares the judgment's independence group.","independence_group":"india-supreme-court-judgment-15-oct-2026"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://courtbook.in/posts/supreme-court-criticises-lawyer-for-blaming-client-over-ai-generated-fake-judgments","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full. A report of the judgment, so it shares the judgment's independence group.","independence_group":"india-supreme-court-judgment-15-oct-2026"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["unknown"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["Which judgments in the compilation were disputed and whether they exist.","Whether an AI tool was used to prepare the compilation, which tool, and by whom.","The date of the hearing at which the objection was raised.","Whether any disciplinary step against the advocate-on-record followed."],"geography":{"basis":"The hearing and the judgment took place in the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi, as the judgment states. The lawyers' and appellants' own countries are not stated.","court_countries":["IN"],"event_countries":["IN"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a court's consequential response to alleged AI use in a filing: the Supreme Court of India recorded the opposing side's objection that a compilation was full of AI-generated non-existent judgments, criticised the filing advocate-on-record for blaming the clients, and proposed exemplary costs that it later deleted. The facts rest on the judgment itself; the AI generation remains the respondents' claim.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-16"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is the Supreme Court's response to alleged AI use in a filing: the respondents objected that a compilation of judgments filed for the appellants was replete with AI-generated non-existent judgments, the Court questioned the appellants' lawyers about it, criticised the advocate-on-record in its judgment for shifting the blame onto the clients, and proposed exemplary costs that it later deleted. The Court did not rely on the disputed judgments and made no finding that they were AI-generated, and no source names a tool or says who prepared the compilation, so the relation is recorded as unknown under the consequential-response exemption and the AI involvement as suspected.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"India Supreme Court rebukes lawyer who blamed the clients for a filing that the other side said was full of AI-generated non-existent judgments","summary":"In a judgment of 15 October 2026 dismissing two appeals against insolvency proceedings concerning two hotel-operating companies, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India recorded that during the hearing the appellants' side had placed on record a compilation of judgments which, according to the respondents, was replete with AI-generated non-existent judgments. The Court recorded that the appellants' advocate-on-record, when questioned, sought to shift the entire blame onto the appellants while feigning ignorance of what the compilation contained, and that the appellants' senior counsel then took the blame on himself and prayed for forgiveness on their behalf. The Court had proposed exemplary costs against the appellants over the incident but deleted that direction after being told that the first appellant had died. The judgment does not identify the disputed judgments, does not make its own finding that they were AI-generated, and does not name any AI tool.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-15","aiSystem":"No AI tool is named. The respondents said that a compilation of judgments filed for the appellants was replete with AI-generated non-existent judgments; the Court recorded that objection and made no separate finding","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI tool (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The Supreme Court criticised the appellants' advocate-on-record in a reportable judgment for shifting blame onto the clients over a compilation the respondents said contained AI-generated non-existent judgments; exemplary costs proposed against the appellants were later deleted (judgment, 15 October 2026).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"The judgment criticises one advocate-on-record by role, so 1 is a documented minimum. The appellants faced proposed exemplary costs that were deleted; they are not counted because no consequence to them was carried out, and the number of people behind the appellants is not stated. Whoever used AI, if anyone, is not established, so no one is counted as a direct AI user.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"IN","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://images.assettype.com/barandbench/2026-10-15/xlwz6h1p/Deepak_Raheja_Vs_Omkara.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Supreme Court of India, judgment in Civil Appeal No. 12195 of 2025 (2026 INSC 1134), 15 October 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-16T03:01:30.734181+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T03:01:30.734181+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["alleged-ai-generated-judgments","court-rebuke","lawyer-conduct","supreme-court-of-india","ai-involvement-suspected"]},{"id":"2026-spanish-dubbing-actor-claudio-serrano-says-ai-platform-offers-unauthorised-clone-of-his-voice","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'una plataforma estadounidense de la que no comenta el nombre para no hacer publicidad cuenta con un perfil en el que aparece su nombre, su imagen e incluso un extracto de su voz clonada presentándose'; 'una plataforma de inteligencia artificial clone su voz sin su permiso'; 'estuviera ahí y lo pudiera usar cualquier para hacer lo que le diera la gana'; 'mucho cuidado con lo que se le está dando gratis a la IA'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'una plataforma estadounidense incluye un perfil con su nombre, su imagen y un extracto de una voz clonada que se presenta como si fuera él.'; 'Serrano compartió su denuncia a través de TikTok.'; 'estuviera ahí y lo pudiera usar cualquiera para hacer lo que le diera la gana'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Serrano says a US-based platform, which he did not name, has a profile with his name, his image and an excerpt of a clone of his voice presenting itself, made without his permission, and that the voice sits there for anyone to use for whatever they want; Computer Hoy and Infobae describe it as an artificial intelligence platform.","causal_attribution":"The actor's own account in a video, relayed by two outlets (one origin)."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'la propia plataforma le pide un captcha de voz para verificar que es el Serrano original'; '\"Los abogados están con ello y a ver qué podemos hacer\", asegura Serrano.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'la plataforma le solicita superar un captcha de voz para demostrar que él es la persona que presenta la denuncia.'; '“Los abogados están con ello y a ver qué podemos hacer”, aseguró Serrano'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Serrano says the platform asked him to pass a voice captcha to verify his identity when he complained, and that his lawyers are working on the matter.","causal_attribution":"The actor's own account, relayed by two outlets (one origin)."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'\"desc\":\"Lo de que te clonen la voz sin tu permiso… #clonar #IA #doblaje #locucion #voiceover  ¿Qué opináis? Os leo.'; '\"createTime\":\"1789138430\"'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Serrano posted a TikTok video captioned 'Lo de que te clonen la voz sin tu permiso…' on 11 September 2026 (TikTok createTime 1789138430).","causal_attribution":"The post's own caption and platform timestamp."}],"effects":[{"label":"voice cloned and offered on an AI platform under his name and image without permission","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"asked by the platform to pass a voice captcha to complain; lawyers engaged","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://computerhoy.20minutos.es/tecnologia/actor-doblaje-batman-drama-los-derechos-autor-mucho-cuidado-con-que-le-damos-gratis-ia-volvamos-hacer-las-cosas-bien_7038152_0.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish on 2026-10-13 through the MSN syndication copy (assets.msn.com Detail JSON, provider Computer Hoy, published 2026-10-12T06:45Z); the origin returned HTTP 403. Translation by the research agent (an AI). Relays Serrano's TikTok video.","independence_group":"serrano-tiktok-video"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.infobae.com/tecno/2026/10/12/la-voz-de-batman-y-ant-man-en-espanol-denuncio-que-una-ia-clono-su-voz-sin-autorizacion/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200). Translation by the research agent (an AI). Relays the same TikTok video, so it shares an independence group with s1.","independence_group":"serrano-tiktok-video"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.tiktok.com/@claudioserrano_oficial/video/7684291025673751841","kind":"first_person_account","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"TikTok oEmbed and page JSON read on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200): caption and createTime only; the video's audio was not inspected. Translation by the research agent (an AI).","independence_group":"serrano-tiktok-video"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","privacy"],"unknowns":["The platform's name, its description of the voice and how the clone was made","When the profile appeared and whether anyone has used the cloned voice","Any response from the platform and the outcome of his lawyers' work","The full content of the TikTok video (audio not inspected)"],"geography":{"basis":"Event: the platform is described as US-based, but a provider's headquarters does not locate the event and where the profile was made or accessed is not stated. Affected person: he is described as a Spanish dubbing actor; nationality and working language do not establish where he was when affected. No court is involved.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a reported first-person account: dubbing actor Claudio Serrano said in a TikTok video of 11 September 2026, relayed by Computer Hoy and Infobae, that an unnamed US-based AI platform offers a clone of his voice under his name and image without his permission, that it asked him for a voice captcha when he complained, and that his lawyers are working on it. The platform is unnamed and its account is unknown. He is named as a public performer who made the complaint publicly himself.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Serrano says, in his own TikTok video as relayed by Computer Hoy and Infobae, that a US-based platform carries a profile with his name and image and an excerpt of a clone of his voice presenting itself, and that the voice sits there for anyone to use for whatever they want; in the same video he warns about what is given free to AI. The basis for AI generation is the platform's offering as he observed it: a voice on a platform profile that anyone can use to say whatever they want is a reusable generated voice, which a recording or a human imitator cannot be. Both outlets describe it as an artificial intelligence platform. The cloned voice impersonates him (depicted_or_impersonated) and is the object of his complaint. The platform is unnamed and its listing was not inspected for this record, so the platform's own description of the voice and how it was made rest on his account.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Spanish dubbing actor Claudio Serrano says a US-based AI platform offers an unauthorised clone of his voice under his name and image","summary":"Claudio Serrano, the Spanish dubbing actor who is the Spanish-language voice of Batman and Ant-Man, said in a TikTok video posted on 11 September 2026 that a US-based artificial intelligence platform, which he did not name, has a profile carrying his name, his image and an excerpt of a clone of his voice presenting itself, made and offered without his permission. Computer Hoy and Infobae relayed the video on 12 October 2026. Serrano said that when he tried to complain, the platform asked him to pass a voice captcha to prove he is the real Serrano, and that his lawyers are working on the matter. The platform's account of the voice, its name and any response are unknown.","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-12","aiSystem":"Unnamed US-based AI platform offering a cloned version of the actor's voice on a profile with his name and image, as he describes it","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Serrano says an AI platform offers a clone of his voice under his name and image without his permission, that it asked him to pass a voice captcha when he complained, and that his lawyers are working on the matter.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: Serrano, whose voice he says was cloned and offered (claim c1). He did not use the platform to make the clone. No users of the cloned voice or people deceived by it are reported.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://computerhoy.20minutos.es/tecnologia/actor-doblaje-batman-drama-los-derechos-autor-mucho-cuidado-con-que-le-damos-gratis-ia-volvamos-hacer-las-cosas-bien_7038152_0.html","primarySourceLabel":"Computer Hoy, 12 October 2026: the Batman dubbing actor and the copyright drama","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-13T03:13:36.683256+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:13:36.683256+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["voice-cloning","voice-actor","dubbing","unauthorised-use","first-person-account","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-kalgoorlie-chatgpt-eviction-belief-caravan-park-owner-threatened-fine","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'[the man] waited outside the store and, when the owner left, called him over for a fight in the carpark. The owner declined to fight, and [the man] threatened him by saying, “I really want to f… you up,” and “if I see you, I’ll f… you up”.'; 'The owner and his wife left the Spudshed carpark and drove to Kalgoorlie police station to report what had happened.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The owner declined to fight, and [the man] threatened him by saying, “I really want to f… you up,” and “if I see you, I’ll f… you up”.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The man called the caravan park owner over for a fight in the Spudshed car park and, when the owner declined, threatened him; the owner and his wife drove to Kalgoorlie police station to report it.","causal_attribution":"Prosecution facts as reported from the hearing; the man pleaded guilty."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Defence lawyer Will Reid said his client had some “tenancy issues” while staying at the caravan park owned by the victim and had been locked out without his belongings.'; 'He said [the man] had done research using AI chatbot ChatGPT and came to believe that he had been unfairly and illegally evicted from the park.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'A man who tried to fight the owner of a Kalgoorlie-Boulder caravan park because ChatGPT told him he had been unlawfully evicted has been fined $1000.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"His defence lawyer told the court that he had been locked out of the park without his belongings, had done research using ChatGPT, and came to believe that he had been unfairly and illegally evicted.","causal_attribution":"Defence submission in mitigation. The newsroom's opening sentence states the ChatGPT link as fact, but its only reported basis is the lawyer's statement; ChatGPT's replies are not published."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The 21-year-old appeared in Kalgoorlie Magistrates Court on Monday where he pleaded guilty to making a threat to unlawfully do an act.'; 'Magistrate Donna Webb said [the man]’s behaviour was “absolutely appalling” and fined him $1000.'; 'However, Ms Webb did grant him the spent conviction after prosecuting Sgt Kim Sullivan said he would not oppose it.'; 'could now have difficulty with his application for permanent residency in Australia'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"He pleaded guilty in Kalgoorlie Magistrates Court to making a threat to unlawfully do an act; the magistrate fined him A$1,000 and granted a spent conviction, and the court was told the matter could make his permanent-residency application difficult.","causal_attribution":"Court outcome as reported; the fine is for the threat, not for the AI use."}],"effects":[{"label":"the caravan park owner was threatened in a supermarket car park and reported it to police","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the ChatGPT user was fined A$1,000 and told the case could affect his permanent-residency application","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.kalminer.com.au/news/regional/martin-paul-antoine-titou-xamena-made-threats-against-park-owner-after-chatgpt-said-he-was-unfairly-evicted-c-22801746","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Full body read by curl on 2026-09-29 (JSON-LD articleBody and visible text; datePublished 2026-08-31T18:00Z). Court report of the hearing.","independence_group":"west-australian-newspapers"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/court-justice/martin-paul-antoine-titou-xamena-made-threats-against-park-owner-after-chatgpt-said-he-was-unfairly-evicted-c-22807611","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Full body read by curl on 2026-09-29; identical text to s1 (same newsroom group), published 2026-09-01T07:01Z under the social headline 'ChatGPT legal advice backfires, costs miner $1000 in court'. Not independent of s1.","independence_group":"west-australian-newspapers"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["What the man asked ChatGPT and what it answered, and whether its view of the eviction was legally wrong.","The date of the threat (the report gives only the hearing, held on a Monday shortly before publication).","Whether the eviction was lawful; the tenancy dispute's outcome is not reported."],"geography":{"basis":"The threat took place in the Spudshed car park and the caravan park is in Kalgoorlie-Boulder, Western Australia; the hearing was in Kalgoorlie Magistrates Court. The man is a French national living in Kalgoorlie-Boulder on a working holiday visa; affected_person_countries records where both people were living.","court_countries":["AU"],"event_countries":["AU"],"affected_person_countries":["AU"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a court-reported case in which a person's belief, formed through ChatGPT research according to his lawyer, preceded a threat against another person and a criminal fine. The AI connection rests solely on the defence submission as reported by one newsroom group; the chat content is not public. Neither the man nor the park owner is named here.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The only account of AI involvement is the defence lawyer's submission in mitigation, as reported by the Kalgoorlie Miner and PerthNow: the man 'had done research using AI chatbot ChatGPT and came to believe that he had been unfairly and illegally evicted from the park.' No chat content is published and the prosecution's account does not mention AI.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Kalgoorlie-Boulder, Western Australia: a working-holiday miner who, his lawyer said, came to believe from ChatGPT research that he had been illegally evicted from a caravan park threatened the park's owner and was fined A$1,000","summary":"A 21-year-old French national working as an underground miner in Kalgoorlie-Boulder on a working holiday visa pleaded guilty in Kalgoorlie Magistrates Court to making a threat to unlawfully do an act. The prosecutor said he saw the owner of the caravan park where he had stayed in a supermarket, waited outside, called him over for a fight in the car park and, when the owner declined, told him 'I really want to f… you up' and 'if I see you, I'll f… you up'. The owner and his wife drove to Kalgoorlie police station to report it. His defence lawyer told the court that he had been locked out of the park without his belongings, had done research using ChatGPT and came to believe that he had been unfairly and illegally evicted. The magistrate called the behaviour 'absolutely appalling', fined him A$1,000 and granted a spent conviction. The court was told the matter could make his application for permanent residency in Australia difficult. ChatGPT's replies are not published, and the AI connection rests on the defence submission as reported by one newsroom.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-31","aiSystem":"ChatGPT (OpenAI), used by the man for research about his eviction, per his defence lawyer; the model version and the replies are not reported","aiProduct":"ChatGPT (reported)","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["harm_to_others","legal_harm","financial_loss"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The caravan park owner was threatened in a supermarket car park and, with his wife, reported it to police; the man who made the threat, whose lawyer said ChatGPT research had convinced him he was illegally evicted, was fined A$1,000 and told the case could affect his permanent-residency application (court report of the prosecution facts and the defence submission; ChatGPT's replies are not published).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One participant user: the man who, per his lawyer, used ChatGPT and was fined A$1,000. One other person: the caravan park owner, who was threatened. The owner's wife was present when they reported it but no threat to her is reported, so she is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"AU-WA","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.kalminer.com.au/news/regional/martin-paul-antoine-titou-xamena-made-threats-against-park-owner-after-chatgpt-said-he-was-unfairly-evicted-c-22801746","primarySourceLabel":"Kalgoorlie Miner, 1 September 2026 (AWST): Man made threats after ChatGPT said he was unfairly evicted","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T09:10:15.517877+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:42.208475+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["chatgpt","legal-advice","tenancy","threat","fine","own-use","kalgoorlie","western-australia","court-report"]},{"id":"2026-doe-v-xai-grok-abuse-survivor-known-series-images","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Using pre-existing and known CSAM involving Plaintiff, Grok generated new CSAM,'; 'xAI, using Grok, has generated images depicting Plaintiff and the child pornography'; 'The Canadian Centre for Child Protection has identified AI-generated CSAM on xAI'; '(hereinafter, “NCMEC”) in the early 2000s'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'attorneys for the plaintiff stated that the Canadian Centre for Child Protection used images’ fingerprints to identify AI-generated CSAM on X that depicted their client.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'that Grok generated new sexually explicit images of her likeness'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'It also claims “xAI, using Grok, has generated images depicting Plaintiff and the child pornography series in which she is the victim.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Grok generated new child sexual abuse images depicting the plaintiff, an adult survivor whose childhood abuse was recorded in a known image series identified by NCMEC in the early 2000s, and that the Canadian Centre for Child Protection has identified AI-generated abuse images of her on xAI's service.","causal_attribution":"Alleged by the plaintiff. The complaint does not say when the images were generated, who prompted them, or how many there were; no court has ruled on the allegations and xAI has not responded publicly."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'CSAM depicting Plaintiff with its longstanding well-known hash values has been used'; 'as a part of the dataset used by xAI.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The complaint alleges that same material was part of the dataset xAI used to build Grok’s image and video generating capabilities'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that the known abuse images of the plaintiff, with their long-established hash values, were part of the dataset xAI used for Grok.","causal_attribution":"Allegation about training data; the complaint does not describe how this was established."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Each time Grok created new CSAM concerning Plaintiff, Grok caused her a new'; 'compounding the already extensive harm Plaintiff suffered.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Our client has lived for nearly two decades knowing that images of the worst thing that ever happened to her are circulating among predators online, and that they can resurface at any moment,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The complaint says each new image Grok created or re-published of the plaintiff caused her a new personal injury, compounding the harm she already suffered from the circulation of her abuse images; her counsel says she has lived for nearly two decades knowing the images circulate and can resurface at any moment.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's and counsel's characterization of her injury; no specific symptoms or consequences are described."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Filed 08/26/26'; 'Plaintiff seeks relief under the federal cause of action known as “Masha’s Law,”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Date Filed: Aug. 26, 2026'; 'Sep 22, 2026'; 'Order Relating Case'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The plaintiff filed the proposed nationwide class action against X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC on 26 August 2026 in the Northern District of California, under Masha's Law (18 U.S.C. § 2255) and 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(f); an order relating the case was entered on 22 September 2026.","causal_attribution":"Procedural record only."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Neither xAI nor SpaceX, which acquired the company in February, returned requests for comment regarding the lawsuit.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'On Jan. 14, after the period tracked by the center, Musk wrote on X that he was “not aware of any naked underage images of Grok. Literally zero.”'","relation":"context","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"Neither xAI nor SpaceX, which acquired xAI in February 2026, responded to the Guardian's request for comment; Musk had written on X on 14 January 2026 that he was not aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok.","causal_attribution":"Response record; Musk's statement is general and does not address this plaintiff."}],"effects":[{"label":"Grok allegedly generated new sexual-abuse images depicting an identified adult survivor of childhood abuse, from her known abuse image series","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the survivor says each new image caused her a new injury on top of two decades of her abuse images circulating","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477196/gov.uscourts.cand.477196.1.0_1.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Class Action Complaint, Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp., No. 5:26-cv-09016 (N.D. Cal., San Jose), ECF 1, filed 26 August 2026; RECAP PDF (23 pages) read in full on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200). The plaintiff's allegations, not findings; several key facts are pleaded without dates.","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74706848/doe-1-v-xai-corp/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CourtListener docket read newest-first on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200; last known filing 28 Sept 2026). Procedural facts only; the 22 September order relating the case was not read.","independence_group":"ndcal-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://girardsharp.com/child-sexual-abuse-survivor-files-class-action-against-xai-alleging-grok-was-trained-on-her-abuse-material-and-generated-new-csam/","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Plaintiff's counsel Girard Sharp press release, 27 August 2026, read live on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.irishexaminer.com/world/arid-41906197.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"The Guardian's report by Nick Robins-Early (3 September 2026), read in the Irish Examiner's syndicated copy credited to The Guardian on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200); the theguardian.com URL was not located. It relays the complaint and interviews plaintiff's counsel.","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://cyberscoop.com/xai-grok-csam-class-action-lawsuit/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"CyberScoop, Derek B. Johnson, 27 August 2026, read live on 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200). Relays the complaint; its paraphrase that the hash values 'have shown up in deepfakes created with Grok and spread on X' is broader than the complaint's wording and is not relied on.","independence_group":"plaintiff-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy"],"unknowns":["When the images of the plaintiff were generated or posted, how many there were, and who prompted them.","Whether the Canadian Centre for Child Protection's identification has been confirmed by any source other than the plaintiff's filing and counsel.","The plaintiff's country of residence.","xAI's response to the allegations."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint says only that the plaintiff resides outside California; her country and where the images were generated or posted are not stated. The case is in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete adverse account of an identified person depicted in AI-generated abuse images, resting on the plaintiff's federal complaint, counsel's statements and news reports relaying them. All facts about Grok's role are allegations; nothing identifying the plaintiff and no description of the images is recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges Grok generated the images and that the Canadian Centre for Child Protection identified AI-generated images of her on xAI's service; counsel told the Guardian the identification used the series' hash fingerprints. No independent confirmation of the identification or of which prompts produced the images was inspected.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Doe 1 v. xAI: an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse alleges Grok generated new abuse images of her from her known, hashed abuse series, which she says xAI used as training data","summary":"A survivor who was sexually abused as a preschool-aged child and now sues individually under the pseudonym Jane Doe 1, and whose abuse images have circulated online since the early 2000s as a series known to NCMEC, sued xAI on 26 August 2026 in the Northern District of California. Her complaint alleges that those known images were part of the dataset xAI used for Grok and that Grok generated new abuse images depicting her; her lawyers say the Canadian Centre for Child Protection used the series' hash fingerprints to identify AI-generated images of her on X. The complaint says each new image caused her a new injury. It seeks damages under Masha's Law for a proposed class of people whose childhood images Grok altered into abuse material. The complaint does not say when the images of her were made or who prompted them. xAI did not respond to requests for comment, and no court has ruled on the allegations.","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-26","aiSystem":"Grok image generation on X and xAI's services (the complaint does not identify the specific tool or model version used for the images of the plaintiff)","aiProduct":"Grok","aiCompany":"xAI (X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC; acquired by SpaceX in February 2026)","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The plaintiff alleges that Grok generated new abuse images depicting her from her known childhood abuse series and that each new image caused her a new injury; her counsel describes two decades of living with the images' circulation (the plaintiff's complaint and counsel; no court finding).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"The named plaintiff (1 person depicted). The proposed class of 'at least thousands' is counsel's estimate of class membership and is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.477196/gov.uscourts.cand.477196.1.0_1.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Class Action Complaint, Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp., No. 5:26-cv-09016 (N.D. Cal.), filed 26 August 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T09:04:05.310491+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:35.914162+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["xai","grok","csam","image-generation","training-data","masha's-law","class-action","survivor","depicted"]}]}