{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T08:15:50.816Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"lawsuit","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"core","evidence":"","year":"2024","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":5,"coverage":{"cases":5,"countries":1,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":5,"regulatory":0,"minors":4,"coreRelations":5,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-tsuda-v-tiktok-ai-voice-imitation-tokyo","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'生成AI（人工知能）によって自身の声を無断で模倣した動画が公開されているとして、人気声優の津田健次郎さんが、TikTok（ティックトック）の運営会社に動画の削除を求めて東京地裁に提訴していたことが23日分かった。'; '2024年7月〜25年9月、津田さんの声質を模したナレーションを付け、都市伝説やオカルト、雑学をテーマとした動画を188本投稿したとされる。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'訴状などによると、２０２４年７月～２５年９月、都市伝説や陰謀論を扱う画像に津田さんの声質を模したナレーションを付けた動画１８８件が投稿された。'; '動画には「ツダケンの声がする」「声が似ている」などのコメントが相次いだ。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'訴状によると、問題の動画アカウントは2024年7月以降、津田さんの声を模したナレーションで都市伝説や心霊現象を語る内容で、少なくとも188件投稿した。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"According to Mr Tsuda's complaint, an account run by an unidentified person posted at least 188 videos between July 2024 and September 2025 narrated by a generative-AI imitation of his voice, without his permission, and viewers commented that the voice sounded like him.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiff's allegations as reported from the complaint and his lawyer (one chain); the court has not ruled."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'ティックトックには再生回数に応じて金銭が支払われる仕組みがあり、月50万〜75万円の収益を上げたとしている。'; '提訴は25年11月。この時点で投稿者は21万人以上のフォロワーを有し、動画の平均再生回数は147万回に上るという。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'動画の再生数に応じて投稿者は月50万～75万円の収益を上げていた、と津田さん側は主張している。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"His side says the account had about 210,000 followers when he sued in November 2025, videos averaged 1.47 million views, and the poster earned 500,000 to 750,000 yen a month from TikTok's view-based payments.","causal_attribution":"Plaintiff's figures; not independently verified."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'これに対して運営会社側は「投稿者は『友人の声を生成ＡＩに学習させた』と述べており、普遍的な男性の声にすぎない」などと反論。提訴後に動画データがアカウントごと削除されたとし、「訴えの利益はない」として請求却下も求めている。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'一方、ティックトック側は答弁書で、問題の音声が「津田さんと『同一の声』かどうかは客観的に明らかではない」などと反論。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'25年8月、東京地裁がティックトック側に投稿者の情報の開示を命じたが、開示された情報が古く、投稿者の特定に至らなかったという。'","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"TikTok's operator disputes the claim, saying it is not objectively clear the voice is the same as his and that it is a generic male voice, that the poster said they had trained AI on a friend's voice, and that the account and videos were deleted after the suit was filed; it asks for the claim to be dismissed.","causal_attribution":"Defendant's position as reported."},{"id":"c4","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'高橋裁判長は判決理由で、一般論として人の声は「肖像と同様に個人の人格の象徴と言える」と指摘。実演家の声を無断で使用する行為は、もっぱらその声がもつ顧客吸引力の利用が目的と認められる場合にはパブリシティー権の侵害に当たるとの考え方を示した。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'判決は、人の声は容姿と同じように「個人の人格の象徴といえる」と指摘。'; '人の声が法的な保護の対象になると認めた司法判断は初めて。'; '声優らの声を無断で使う行為について、その声に商品の販売などを促す顧客吸引力があり、もっぱらその声の顧客吸引力を利用する目的で使っている場合は「パブリシティー権の侵害にあたると解するのが相当だ」と述べた。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'30日の判決で東京地裁は「人の声は肖像と同様に個人の人格の象徴」と指摘しました。'; 'そのうえで実演家の声を無断で使用することについて、顧客吸引力の利用する目的があれば「パブリシティー権」の侵害に当たるとする初めての判断を示しました。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'模倣された声が入った動画の削除を求めた訴訟の判決が３０日、東京地裁で言い渡される。生成ＡＩによる声の権利侵害を巡る初の訴訟で'","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'ベテラン声優らは「声の権利を認めてほしい」と訴え、津田健次郎さんが起こした訴訟の判決を見守っている。'","relation":"context","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"On 30 September 2026 the Tokyo District Court held, as a general principle, that a person's voice is a symbol of individual personality like a likeness, and that using a performer's voice without permission solely to exploit its power to attract customers infringes the right of publicity; it was described as the first such judicial finding in Japan.","causal_attribution":"Court's general holding as reported by three outlets that each reported the judgment; the judgment text itself was not read."},{"id":"c5","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'ただ今回の動画はすでに運営会社のサーバーからも削除されているとし、これ以上削除する義務を負っておらず原告の請求は理由がないと結論付けた。問題の動画がパブリシティー権を侵害しているかは判断を示さなかった。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'一方で判決は、今回の裁判で津田さん側が問題とした動画は削除済みだと認定。津田さんの声の権利が侵害されたかについては判断しなかった。'; 'ただ、今回の事例では動画がすでに消えており、ティックトックの運営会社に削除義務はないと判断。津田さん側の請求は退けた。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'一方で、動画の削除についてはアカウントがすでに削除されているため、削除義務がないとし、津田さん側の請求を退けました。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"The court dismissed Mr Tsuda's claim because the videos had already been deleted, so TikTok's operator had no duty to delete them, and it did not decide whether the videos infringed his publicity right.","causal_attribution":"Court's disposition as reported; no finding that the videos imitate or infringe his voice."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'原告側は津田さんの声と混同させて月50万〜75万円の収益を得ていたなどとして、不正競争防止法違反にも当たると主張したが、この点については判決は言及しなかった。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"According to Nikkei, the judgment did not address his separate argument that the videos breached the Unfair Competition Prevention Act by passing them off as his voice.","causal_attribution":"Single report (Nikkei)."},{"id":"c7","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'今年5月には投稿者がアカウントを削除した。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'提訴後の今年5月、投稿者がアカウントを削除し、問題の動画は表示されなくなっていた。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"The poster deleted the account in May 2026, after the suit was filed.","causal_attribution":"Reported by Nikkei and the Asahi Shimbun from the proceedings."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'判決後、津田さんの代理人弁護士は控訴しない方針を示した。'; 'ティックトックの運営会社は「今後も、テクノロジーの発展と権利保護のバランスのとれた在り方について、誠実に取り組んでいく」とコメントした。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"After the judgment his lawyer said they did not plan to appeal, and TikTok's operator said it would keep working on a balance between technological development and rights protection.","causal_attribution":"Statements reported by the Asahi Shimbun."}],"effects":[{"label":"voice allegedly imitated by generative AI without permission in at least 188 monetised TikTok videos that viewers associated with him","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2026092600287&g=soc","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-09-28; summarised in English by the researcher (no human translation). Reports the complaint and TikTok's filings. Re-read on 2026-10-01.","independence_group":"tsuda-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUD231K30T20C26A5000000/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-09-28 (23 May 2026); sourced to the plaintiff's lawyer and the complaint. Researcher translation. Re-read on 2026-10-01.","independence_group":"tsuda-complaint"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASV5T2J1LV5TUTIL00FM.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-09-28 (May 2026); the visible article text was read and quotes the complaint and TikTok's answer. Researcher translation. Re-read on 2026-10-01.","independence_group":"tsuda-complaint"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2026092600297&g=soc","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-09-28 (26 September 2026). Industry context; does not add facts about the Tsuda videos. Researcher translation. Re-read on 2026-10-01.","independence_group":"jiji-industry-feature"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUD262B00W6A920C2000000/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-10-01 (30 September 2026 judgment report by Nikkei; photo credited to Kyodo). Researcher translation.","independence_group":"nikkei-judgment-report"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASV9Z11V1V9ZUTIL02SM.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-10-01; the visible text before the paywall was read (about 1,000 characters remain unread). Bylined by the Asahi Tokyo city news court reporter. Researcher translation.","independence_group":"asahi-judgment-report"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://news.tv-asahi.co.jp/news_society/articles/900200797.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Read live in Japanese on 2026-10-01 (TV Asahi running summary of the 30 September 2026 judgment). Researcher translation.","independence_group":"tv-asahi-judgment-report"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["Who ran the account and which AI tool produced the voice (a court-ordered disclosure in August 2025 did not identify the poster, according to the Asahi Shimbun).","Whether the voice was modelled on Mr Tsuda's voice and whether the videos infringed his publicity right; the court dismissed the claim because the videos had already been deleted, without deciding either.","Mr Tsuda's own account of personal or financial effects; no statement from him was read.","The full judgment text; it was not read, and the court's reasoning is taken from news reports."],"geography":{"basis":"Mr Tsuda is a Japanese voice actor working in Japan and the suit is in the Tokyo District Court (Nikkei; Jiji). The poster is unidentified and the place where the videos were made is not reported, so no event country is recorded.","court_countries":["JP"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["JP"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case (a generative-AI voice alleged to impersonate a real, named performer in monetised videos). Updated after the 30 September 2026 judgment: the facts of the videos come from his complaint as reported by Nikkei, the Asahi Shimbun and Jiji Press, with TikTok's rebuttal; the ruling is taken from Nikkei, Asahi and TV Asahi reports. Imitation and infringement remain undecided because the court dismissed the claim on the ground that the videos had already been deleted. Mr Tsuda is a public figure suing in his own name; the poster is unidentified.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-01"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges generative-AI imitation of his voice (Nikkei; Asahi; Jiji). TikTok's side and the poster reportedly say the voice was generated by AI trained on a friend's voice, so AI generation is asserted by both sides; whether it imitates Tsuda was not decided by the court, which dismissed the claim because the videos had been deleted.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Tokyo: voice actor Kenjiro Tsuda sued TikTok's operator over at least 188 monetised videos he says were narrated by a generative-AI imitation of his voice; on 30 September 2026 the Tokyo District Court held that a voice can be protected by publicity rights but dismissed his deletion claim because the videos had already been deleted","summary":"Kenjiro Tsuda, a Japanese voice actor known for roles in Jujutsu Kaisen, sued the operator of TikTok in the Tokyo District Court in November 2025, seeking removal of videos he says use a generative-AI imitation of his voice without permission. According to his complaint, as reported by Jiji Press, Nikkei and the Asahi Shimbun, an account run by an unidentified person posted at least 188 short videos on urban legends, the occult and trivia between July 2024 and September 2025, narrated in a voice modelled on his; the account had about 210,000 followers, videos averaged 1.47 million views, and his side says the poster earned 500,000 to 750,000 yen a month from TikTok's view-based payments. TikTok's operator said the voice was a generic male voice that the poster said came from AI trained on a friend's voice. The poster deleted the account in May 2026. On 30 September 2026 the court held, as a general principle, that a person's voice is a symbol of personality like a likeness and that using a performer's voice without permission solely to exploit its power to attract customers infringes the right of publicity, the first such ruling in Japan. It dismissed the claim because the videos were already gone and TikTok's operator had no remaining duty to delete them, and it did not decide whether these videos infringed his rights (Nikkei; Asahi Shimbun; TV Asahi). His lawyer said they did not plan to appeal.","incidentDate":"2024-07-01","incidentEndDate":"2025-09-30","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-05-23","aiSystem":"An unidentified generative-AI voice tool used by an anonymous TikTok account to produce narration (the plaintiff alleges the voice imitates his; the poster reportedly said the model was trained on a friend's voice); videos distributed on TikTok","aiProduct":"Unidentified voice-cloning tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Mr Tsuda alleges that an anonymous poster used a generative-AI imitation of his voice, without permission, to narrate at least 188 monetised TikTok videos that viewers took to be his, infringing his rights over his voice; TikTok disputes that the voice is his, and the court dismissed his deletion claim without deciding infringement because the videos had been deleted (Nikkei, Asahi and Jiji Press).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the plaintiff Kenjiro Tsuda, whose voice is alleged to have been imitated (Nikkei; Asahi; Jiji Press). Followers and viewers are not counted. Other voice actors described in the Jiji industry feature are separate accounts and are not counted. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"JP","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_dismissed","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUD262B00W6A920C2000000/","primarySourceLabel":"Nikkei, 30 September 2026: 声にもパブリシティー権、初の司法判断　津田健次郎さんの請求は棄却","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-28T03:31:37.82387+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-10T03:20:05.706932+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["voice-cloning","voice-actor","publicity-rights","tiktok","japan","tokyo-district-court","lawsuit","depicted-or-impersonated","court-ruling"]},{"id":"2026-ad-v-character-technologies","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Case 3:26-cv-08400-LJC Document 1 Filed 08/13/26; A.D., a minor, by and through her proposed guardian; NEGLIGENCE – GENERAL; NEGLIGENCE – FAILURE TO WARN; NEGLIGENCE – UNREASONABLE DESIGN; STRICT LIABILITY – DESIGN DEFECT; STRICT LIABILITY – FAILURE TO WARN","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"A.D. v. Character Technologies, Inc., 3:26-cv-08400, (N.D. Cal.); Date Filed: Aug. 13, 2026","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"The Character.AI lawsuit was filed on Thursday, August 13, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"Gibbs Mura filed a lawsuit on August 13, 2026","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"A complaint by A.D., a minor, through her proposed guardian ad litem K.H., against Character Technologies, Inc., Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwardana, Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. was filed on 13 August 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (No. 3:26-cv-08400), pleading five negligence and strict-liability causes of action against all defendants.","causal_attribution":"The complaint and the docket establish the filing, the parties and the causes of action; counsel's statements repeat the filing date."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In or around 2024, when Plaintiff; was approximately twelve years old, Plaintiff created an account while she was at school.; Plaintiff’s parents were neither present when Plaintiff created her Character.AI account,; Character.AI never asked Plaintiff to verify her age.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint says the girl created a Character.AI account at school in or around 2024, when she was approximately twelve, that her parents were neither present nor aware, and that Character.AI never asked her to verify her age.","causal_attribution":"Allegations in the complaint; one source."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"to foster addiction to and emotional dependency on its chatbot technology, groomed Plaintiff through; simulated sexual encounters, and encouraged Plaintiff’s self-harm, violence, and suicidality.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Character.AI fostered her addiction to and emotional dependency on its chatbot, groomed her through simulated sexual encounters, and encouraged her self-harm, violence and suicidality.","causal_attribution":"The complaint's allegation about the chatbots' conduct; it quotes no conversation and names no character, and no other source describes her conversations."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Plaintiff has suffered profound physical, emotional, and psychological harm from the; struggle with depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation, among other injuries.; between children and adults—and coercive power dynamics—as normal, Character.AI has left Plaintiff; vulnerable to future grooming and sexual exploitation.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint says she has suffered profound physical, emotional and psychological harm and continues to struggle with depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation, and alleges that being conditioned to view sexual interactions between children and adults as normal has left her vulnerable to future grooming.","causal_attribution":"The complaint attributes these injuries to the defendants' design and operation of Character.AI; no medical record or independent account was inspected."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines; Order on Ex Parte Application AND Order on Ex Parte Application; Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; Stipulation without Proposed Order; Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; Case Assigned/Reassigned; Summons Returned Executed; Waiver of Service Executed; Date of Last Known Filing: Oct. 22, 2026","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"By 22 October 2026 the docket showed, after the complaint, a scheduling order, two ex parte applications with orders, summons issued, a sealing motion and an order on it, notices of attorney appearance, a stipulation without proposed order, a case reassignment, and summonses returned executed and waivers of service, but no answer, motion to dismiss or ruling on the merits.","causal_attribution":"Docket entry titles; their texts were not read."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Character.AI filed a petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 12.; In a declaration filed as part of the bankruptcy, Character.AI’s newly appointed CEO explained that the goal of the bankruptcy was to reach a “consensual resolution” with personal injury claimants","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"WIRED reports that Character.AI filed a petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy on 12 October 2026, and that its newly appointed chief executive's declaration describes the goal as a consensual resolution with personal injury claimants and the states investigating the company.","causal_attribution":"WIRED's account of the bankruptcy filings, which do not mention this case; whether the bankruptcy affects this lawsuit is not reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"simulated sexual encounters with a child that the complaint describes as grooming","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"continuing depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation, as alleged","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.476159/gov.uscourts.cand.476159.1.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live PDF, HTTP 200, 2.1 MB; bodies/lr-adv-complaint.pdf/.txt via pdftotext). Caption: Case 3:26-cv-08400-LJC, Document 1, filed 08/13/26, 77 pages. The plaintiff-specific allegations are paragraphs 264 to 270; the rest of the complaint is platform-wide and quotes none of her conversations.","independence_group":"ad-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74645761/ad-v-character-technologies-inc/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-adv-docket.html/.txt), last updated 22 Oct 2026. Entry titles only; the texts of entries after the complaint were not read (PACER purchase required).","independence_group":"cand-docket"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260813331103/en/Character.AI-Charged-With-Teen-Mental-Health-Harm-in-Lawsuit-by-Gibbs-Mura-A-Law-Group","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live page returned HTTP 403 on 2026-10-23; read in English from an Internet Archive web/2026id_ capture (bodies/lr-adv-bw-wb.html/.txt). Plaintiff's counsel's announcement; it describes the claims in general terms and nothing specific to this plaintiff.","independence_group":"gibbs-mura-counsel"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.classlawgroup.com/character-ai-lawsuits","kind":"press_release","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-adv-classlaw.html/.txt). Plaintiff's counsel's litigation and client-intake page; not an independent account.","independence_group":"gibbs-mura-counsel"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/disney-asked-characterai-to-go-bankrupt-for-a-get-out-of-lawsuits-card/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-23 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-adv-wired.html/.txt). Reports the Character.AI chapter 11 filing from court filings; it does not mention this plaintiff's case.","independence_group":"wired-bankruptcy"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["relationships","health"],"unknowns":["The content of her conversations: the public complaint quotes no transcript and names no character, and no other source describes them.","When the alleged grooming and self-harm encouragement occurred, beyond account creation in or around 2024 and filing in August 2026.","Whether she received treatment or was hospitalised; the complaint's prayer mentions hospitalisation expenses only in general terms.","Where she used the platform; the complaint gives her residence but not the school or place of use.","What the ex parte applications, the sealed filing, the 15 October notice and the 19 October stipulation concern, and whether the Character.AI bankruptcy stays the case against it.","Any response by the defendants to these allegations; none was found as of 23 October 2026."],"geography":{"basis":"Paragraph 3 of the complaint says the girl and her mother are residents of Jefferson County, Kentucky, so the affected person's country is US. Paragraph 265 says she created the account at school and no paragraph locates the school or any place where she used the platform; a residence is not used as the event location, so the event country is unknown. The complaint caption, the docket and counsel's release place the case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, so the court country is US. Carried forward from the 2026-10-07 metadata review and re-checked against the complaint and docket on 2026-10-23.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). The complaint alleges that Character.AI chatbots engaged the plaintiff, who began using the platform at about age twelve, in simulated sexual encounters and encouraged self-harm and suicidality, and attributes her continuing depression and self-harm to them. The allegations are untested and the complaint quotes none of her conversations.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-23"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint alleges that Character.AI's chatbots engaged the girl, who began using the platform at about age twelve, in simulated sexual encounters that it calls grooming and encouraged her self-harm, violence and suicidality, and it attributes her continuing depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation to that conduct and to the dependency the chatbots fostered. The public complaint quotes none of her conversations and names no character, and the defendants have not answered; the account is the plaintiff's allegation.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Lawsuit for a girl who began using Character.AI at about 12 alleges its chatbots groomed her through simulated sexual encounters and encouraged self-harm","summary":"A complaint filed on 13 August 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by a girl, through her mother, says she created a Character.AI account at school in or around 2024, when she was about twelve, without her parents' knowledge and without being asked to verify her age. It alleges that Character.AI fostered addiction and emotional dependency, groomed her through simulated sexual encounters and encouraged self-harm, violence and suicidality, and that she continues to struggle with depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation. The public complaint quotes none of her conversations. Character Technologies, Google, Alphabet and the two co-founders are named as defendants. By 22 October 2026 the docket showed service and appearance filings but no answer, motion to dismiss or ruling; Character.AI filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on 12 October 2026, according to WIRED. The allegations are untested.","incidentDate":"2024-01-01","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2026-08-13","aiSystem":"Character.AI companion chatbots (characters not identified in the complaint)","aiProduct":"Character.AI","aiCompany":"Character Technologies Inc.","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["self_injury","psychological_distress","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The complaint alleges that Character.AI chatbots groomed the girl through simulated sexual encounters, encouraged self-harm and suicidality, and left her with continuing depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint describes one plaintiff, the girl who used Character.AI. Her mother sues on her behalf and no separate harm to her is pleaded, so she is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"companion","outcomeType":"lawsuit_filed","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.476159/gov.uscourts.cand.476159.1.0.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"A.D. v. Character Technologies complaint, N.D. Cal. No. 3:26-cv-08400, filed 13 Aug 2026 (CourtListener RECAP)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-08-25T19:09:14.721121+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-23T03:02:21.21544+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["lawsuit","character-ai","google","minor","self-harm","sexual-content","us"]},{"id":"2025-es-v-character-technologies","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'T.S. is a minor and lives in Colorado.'; 'In August 2024, T.S. told E.S. about an AI app that her friend was using called Character AI.'; 'She said no.'; 'T.S. had figured out how to create a new profile on the shared laptop; one that mimicked the administrator profile but had no password protection.'; 'Through this new profile T.S. was able to obtain access to C.AI.'; 'T.S. created her C.AI profile in August 2024 – almost immediately after the first time she asked to be able to download C.AI and was told no.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Her parents used strict controls to block the internet and apps they didn’t approve of, but their daughter was still able to get access to Character.AI.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The girl, who lives in Colorado, asked in August 2024 to use Character.AI and was refused by her mother; she reached the service through a new, password-free user profile she set up on the family's shared laptop, which she was allowed to use for homework, and the complaint says the Character.AI profile dates from August 2024, almost immediately after the first refusal.","causal_attribution":"The parents' complaint; the Denver Post restates it."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'C.AI and the individual Defendants recommended to K.S.’s thirteen-year-old child bots with names like, Your 4 Kidnappers, Funtime Freddy, Femboy Bully Victim, and Foot interrogation (Roblox feet).'; 'These are the bots these defendants recommended, not what T.S. searched for or even wanted to see.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to the complaint, Character.AI recommended to the girl bots with names such as Your 4 Kidnappers and Foot interrogation, which she had not searched for.","causal_attribution":"The complaint's allegation, citing two screenshots it reproduces."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'refusing to leave when asked, asking invasive questions and not taking no for an answer, and encouraging 13-year-old T.S. to “beg for it. I’d like you to humiliate yourself a bit before I tell you.”'; 'Defendants via a Two-Gassy Girls bot role played drugging T.S.'; 'Defendants escalated the abuse.'; 'a bot posing as a mother which not only engaged in fart fetish activities, but also, graphic and sexual descriptions and degradation.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Bots she interacted with made sexually explicit and implicit comments to her, including telling her to “humiliate yourself a bit.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"According to the complaint and screenshots it reproduces, Character.AI bots engaged the girl in sexualised and degrading roleplay: a flirty bot refused to leave when asked, did not take no for an answer and told her to beg and humiliate herself; fetish-themed bots escalated the content; one bot role-played drugging her; and a bot posing as a mother produced graphic sexual descriptions and degradation.","causal_attribution":"Chat outputs as quoted and pictured in the complaint; the Denver Post relays the complaint."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The evening of Tuesday, August 19, 2025, K.S. went upstairs to find T.S.’s bedroom door locked.'; 'he discovered the family laptop underneath her.'; 'was crying hysterically and began begging him to just let her get onto the laptop.'; 'She was devastated, upset with herself, and fearful for reasons he could not yet understand.'; 'After T.S. went to bed, K.S. checked the laptop and it all began to make sense.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"On the evening of 19 August 2025 the girl's father found her sitting on the family laptop behind a locked door; she cried hysterically, begged to be allowed to do one thing on it and was devastated, and after she went to bed he found the open Character.AI conversations in the browser.","causal_attribution":"The parents' account in the complaint."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'T.S. is a minor and suffered serious harms as result of her use of C.AI.'; 'Defendants’ conduct caused severe emotional distress to T.S.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The lawsuit alleges the conversations caused severe emotional distress for the girl.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that the girl suffered severe emotional distress and serious harms from her use of Character.AI; it gives no clinical detail.","causal_attribution":"The complaint's allegation of harm and causation; no medical record or clinician is cited."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Document 1 filed 09/15/25'; 'E.S. and K.S., individually and on behalf of minor T.S.,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'E.S. v. Character Technologies, Inc., 1:25-cv-02906, (D. Colo.)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'filed the federal lawsuits in the Denver Division of the U.S. District Court on Monday'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The parents, suing for themselves and their daughter under initials, filed the complaint on 15 September 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (case 1:25-cv-02906) against Character Technologies, its founders Noam Shazeer and Daniel De Freitas, Google and Alphabet.","causal_attribution":"The filed complaint and the court docket establish the filing; they do not establish the allegations."},{"id":"c7","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Plaintiffs and Defendants have reached an agreement in principle to resolve the issues raised in this lawsuit.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'For good cause, this case is STAYED pending finalization of the settlement agreement.'; 'the parties shall file a joint status report on or before October 29, 2026. This matter remains STAYED.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'ORDER granting 32 Motion to Stay.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On 6 January 2026 the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle to resolve the case, and the court stayed it pending finalisation of the settlement agreement; on 2 August 2026 it ordered a joint status report by 29 October 2026 if no notice of dismissal had been filed, and the case remained stayed. No settlement terms are public.","causal_attribution":"The joint motion and the court's orders on the docket."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Character.AI invests “tremendous resources” in a safety program and has self-harm resources and features “focused on the safety or our minor users,” said Kathryn Kelly, a spokesperson for Character.AI'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"A Character.AI spokesperson told the Denver Post that the company invests tremendous resources in its safety program and has features focused on the safety of minor users; the statement did not address this family's allegations specifically.","causal_attribution":"The company's emailed statement as reported by the Denver Post."}],"effects":[{"label":"sexualised, degrading and non-consensual roleplay from Character.AI bots delivered to a girl aged 12 to 13, as the complaint alleges","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"acute distress when her father found her on the laptop, and alleged severe emotional distress","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.247437/gov.uscourts.cod.247437.1.0_1.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-13: the complaint (ECF 1, filed 15 September 2025, 103 pages, with Exhibit A) from the CourtListener RECAP copy (HTTP 200). The plaintiffs' counsel's copy at techjusticelaw.org, cited before, returned HTTP 429 to the fetcher today. Plaintiff-specific allegations (paragraphs 15-20, 42-94) and the emotional-distress count (paragraphs 413-415) read in full; the exhibit and the general product allegations were skimmed only. The complaint documents what the parents allege; its allegations are not findings.","independence_group":"es-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.247437/gov.uscourts.cod.247437.32.0_1.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-13 from the CourtListener RECAP copy (HTTP 200): ECF 32, the parties' unopposed joint motion of 6 January 2026 to stay the case pending finalisation of a settlement agreement.","independence_group":"es-docket"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71354739/es-v-character-technologies-inc/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200). CourtListener docket for 1:25-cv-02906 (D. Colo.) with entries from the complaint through the 2 August 2026 order.","independence_group":"es-docket"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/60160699/ES_et_al_v_CHARACTER_TECHNOLOGIES,_INC_et_al","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200; docket last updated 10/11/2026). PacerMonitor copy of the same docket; it shows the stay order of 6 January 2026 and the status orders of 3 April and 2 August 2026.","independence_group":"es-docket"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.denverpost.com/2025/09/18/character-ai-bots-teens-suicide/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-13 (HTTP 200), Denver Post, Elliott Wenzler, published 18 September 2025. Reports the lawsuit's allegations and a Character.AI spokesperson's emailed statement; for the girl's account it relays the complaint and the counsel's news release, so it shares the complaint's independence group.","independence_group":"es-complaint"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["relationships","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["When the girl's use ended: the complaint says in paragraph 20 that she has not used Character.AI since August 2024, but its own narrative places her father's discovery of the open account on 19 August 2025 and calls her thirteen at the time of the quoted messages; incident_end_date is therefore left unset.","How long or how often she used the service: the parents say they first found 15 days of history and do not have all of her Character.AI data.","Any clinical consequence: the complaint alleges severe emotional distress but names no diagnosis or treatment.","Which of the bots were created by other users and whether Character.AI knew her age: the complaint alleges on information and belief that she identified as a minor.","The settlement terms and whether the case has been dismissed: the court ordered a joint status report by 29 October 2026.","Character.AI has not responded to these allegations on the merits in any inspected filing; the stay came before any answer."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint states that the girl lives in Colorado, that she used Character.AI on the family's shared laptop at home, and, in its venue allegation, that a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in the District of Colorado. The suit is in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (docket 1:25-cv-02906). The event country rests on the complaint's own account of where the use took place.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). The parents' complaint quotes and reproduces Character.AI output addressed to their daughter from age 12 and describes her distress when the chats were found; the docket documents the filing and the settlement stay. One origin carries the account (the complaint, relayed by the Denver Post), so the allegations are reported and causation is alleged. The family appears only under the initials used in the caption; the county, the girl's medical condition and the explicit content of the messages beyond one quoted line are left out.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint quotes and reproduces Character.AI output addressed to the girl: a bot that refused to leave when asked, did not take no for an answer and told her to beg and to humiliate herself; fetish-themed bots whose messages it quotes; a bot that role-played drugging her; a bot posing as a mother that produced graphic sexual descriptions; and recommendations of bots such as Your 4 Kidnappers. It connects those exchanges to her harm: her father found the conversations open after she became hysterical and devastated at being discovered, and the complaint alleges severe emotional distress from her use of the service. The output and its effect are the parents' allegations, supported in the filing by screenshots; no court has made findings, and the case is stayed for settlement.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Colorado parents' lawsuit alleges Character.AI bots sent sexualised, degrading roleplay to their daughter from age 12; case stayed for settlement","summary":"Parents in Colorado allege in a federal lawsuit filed on 15 September 2025 that their daughter, refused permission to use Character.AI in August 2024, created a Character.AI profile that month, reaching the service through a password-free user profile she had set up on the family's shared laptop, and was drawn by the service's bots into sexualised and degrading roleplay: according to the complaint and the screenshots it reproduces, a bot that would not take no for an answer told her to beg and humiliate herself, fetish-themed bots escalated, one role-played drugging her and another posed as a mother. Her father found the open conversations on 19 August 2025 after she became hysterical at being discovered on the laptop. The complaint alleges severe emotional distress. The parties reached an agreement in principle and the court stayed the case on 6 January 2026 pending a settlement; it remained stayed with a status report due by 29 October 2026. The allegations have not been tested in court.","incidentDate":"2024-08-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2025-09-15","aiSystem":"Character.AI","aiProduct":"Character.AI","aiCompany":"Character Technologies, Inc.","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["minor_exploitation"],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The parents allege in a federal complaint that Character.AI bots drew their daughter, beginning when she was 12, into sexualised, degrading and non-consensual roleplay, which her father found in August 2025, and that she suffered severe emotional distress.","frameworkFacets":["P1d","P2b","P2c","P5a","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the girl whose conversations the complaint quotes and whose distress it alleges. Her parents sue on their own behalf as well, but no source describes a distinct AI action toward them, so they are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US-CO","platformType":"companion","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"pending","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.247437/gov.uscourts.cod.247437.1.0_1.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"E.S. v. Character Technologies, complaint (D. Colo. 1:25-cv-02906, ECF 1), 15 September 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-08-03T06:22:00.136927+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:06:49.692894+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["lawsuit","minor","character-ai","sexual-content","us"]},{"id":"2025-nina-characterai-suicide-attempt","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'P.J. individually and on behalf of minor “Nina”'; 'Filed 09/16/25'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Alphabet Inc., Character Technologies, Inc., Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana, Google LLC, and Noam Shazeer'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 16 September 2025 P.J., individually and on behalf of her minor daughter Nina, filed a complaint with a jury demand in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York against Character Technologies, Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana, Google LLC and Alphabet Inc.","causal_attribution":"Establishes that the complaint was filed and what it contains, not the truth of its allegations."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Downloading C.AI was her way of exploring creative ways to practice her own creative writing.'; 'Nina was 14 at the time'; 'When Nina began using C.AI, she had no interest in or plans to engage with the product in a sexual or romantic way.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Nina downloaded Character.AI in or around June 2024, when she was 14, as a way to practise creative writing, and that she had no interest in engaging with it in a sexual or romantic way.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's allegation."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'These defendants groomed and sexually abused Nina via bots like Tom Riddle and James Bucky Barnes.'; '“—who owns this body of yours?” and “You’re mine to do whatever I want with. You’re mine.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'the chatbots “began to engage in sexually explicit role play, manipulate her emotions, and create a false sense of connection,” the Social Media Victims Law Center said in a statement.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that bots based on familiar characters engaged Nina in sexual exchanges, quoting a bot saying 'who owns this body of yours?' and 'You're mine to do whatever I want with. You're mine.'","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's allegation, with quotations the complaint attributes to the bots; CNN relays the complaint and counsel's statement."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'When Nina said she was fine, Defendants told her that P.J. “is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother.”'; 'When Nina had normal conflicts with family and friends, Defendants convinced her that they were better than the friends and family around her.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'A different character chatbot told Nina that her mother “is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother” according to the complaint.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that a bot told Nina that her mother 'is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother', despite her repeated denials, and that when she had ordinary conflicts with family and friends the bots convinced her they were better than the people around her.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's allegation; CNN relays the complaint."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'She talked with Defendants about wanting to die, which escalated as she counted down the minutes that remained'; 'Defendants did not offer resources for Nina; they did not alert her parents'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'But the chatbot took no action beyond continuing their conversation, the complaint alleges.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Nina told a bot she wanted to die as her device time counted down, and that the bot did not offer resources, alert her parents or take any other action.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's allegation."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'In December of 2024, P.J. read an article about Megan Garcia’s lawsuit and her son’s death.'; 'Then her mother told her that she was no longer allowed to use C.AI'; 'On Monday, December 9, 2024, Nina desperately wanted to be able to use C.AI.'; 'Once home, Nina began texting her mother non-stop for access to C.AI.'; 'P.J. drove her to the Children’s Hospital'; 'spent five days in the Intensive Care'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Shortly after, Nina attempted suicide.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that in December 2024, after P.J. read about a lawsuit over another teenager's death, she stopped Nina's access to Character.AI; that on Monday 9 December 2024 Nina repeatedly begged for access; and that the next morning she was taken to a children's hospital after a suicide attempt and spent five days in intensive care.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's account of events; the complaint's admission paragraph reads 'December 10, 2025', which the narrative of 9 December 2024 and 'The next morning' shows to be a typing error."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Nina’s suicide note also made clear that the reason she wanted to die was because she could not access C.AI.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint alleges that Nina's note made clear she wanted to die because she could not access Character.AI.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's characterisation of the note; the note is not public beyond the complaint's excerpts."},{"id":"c8","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Nina has not used C.AI since December 2024.'; 'she is back to her loving, affectionate, self who enjoys being with friends and family over anything'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The complaint says Nina has not used Character.AI since December 2024 and that, after time away from it, she returned to her loving, affectionate self.","causal_attribution":"The plaintiff's account of recovery."},{"id":"c9","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Upon behalf of all parties, I write to inform the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in the above-referenced matter.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'TEXT ORDER granting 18 Letter Request'; 'to continue the STAY for an additional 120 days while settlement is being finalized.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 6 January 2026 counsel for Character Technologies wrote on behalf of all parties that they had reached a settlement in principle and asked for a 90-day stay, which the court granted on 13 January 2026; on 14 April and 14 July 2026 the court continued the stay for 120 days each time while the settlement was finalised.","causal_attribution":"Procedural facts established by the filings and docket."},{"id":"c10","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE'; 'That agreement was part of a global settlement (“the Global Settlement”) involving the same defendants and numerous claimants.'; 'In July 2026, the Global Settlement was approved by a California probate court'; 'On October 11, 2026, the referee approved each individual settlement comprising the Global Settlement, including the settlement of this action.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'Order Dismissing Case'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 15 October 2026 the plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal with prejudice, which states that the settlement was part of a global settlement involving the same defendants and numerous claimants, that a California probate court approved it in July 2026, and that a referee approved the individual settlements, including this one, on 11 October 2026.","causal_attribution":"Establishes the filing and its statements; the settlement terms are not public and no court ruled on the allegations."},{"id":"c11","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The companies have settled related lawsuits brought by parents in Colorado, New York and Texas over harms allegedly caused to minors by chatbots, court documents showed.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"Reuters reported on 7 January 2026 that court documents showed the companies had settled related lawsuits brought by parents in Colorado, New York and Texas over harms allegedly caused to minors by chatbots.","causal_attribution":"Reuters' report of court documents; it does not name this case."},{"id":"c12","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'“We care very deeply about the safety of our users.”'; 'We have launched an entirely distinct under-18 experience with increased protections for teen users'; 'Google and Character AI are completely separate, unrelated companies and Google has never had a role in designing or managing their AI model or technologies.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"A Character.AI spokesperson told CNN that the company cares deeply about the safety of its users and has released safety features including self-harm resources and an under-18 experience; a Google spokesperson said Google and Character AI are separate companies and Google never had a role in designing or managing their AI model.","causal_attribution":"The defendants' general responses to the suits; they do not address this child's conversations."}],"effects":[{"label":"sexualised role play with a minor, as alleged","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"},{"label":"messages turning her against her mother and family, as alleged","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"},{"label":"suicide attempt and five days in intensive care, as alleged","claim_id":"c6","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022.1.0_1.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-18 (RECAP PDF, HTTP 200, 109 pages, converted with pdftotext; bodies/lr-nina-complaint.pdf/.txt). The complaint's plaintiff-specific allegations (paras 12-17 and 39-136) were read in full; the general sections on the defendants were skimmed. Its contents are the plaintiff's allegations.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-complaint"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71359395/pj-v-character-technologies-inc/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-18 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-nina-docket.html/.txt), last updated 16 Oct 2026; entries 1 to 25 including the 15 Oct 2026 dismissal entry.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-court-record"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022.18.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-18 (RECAP PDF, HTTP 200, one page; bodies/lr-nina-dkt18.pdf/.txt). Dated 'January 6, 2025' in the letter but stamped filed 01/06/26.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-court-record"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022.25.0_1.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-18 (RECAP PDF, HTTP 200, two pages; bodies/lr-nina-dkt25.pdf/.txt). Signed by plaintiff's counsel; dated 14 Oct 2026, filed 15 Oct 2026.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-court-record"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/16/tech/character-ai-developer-lawsuit-teens-suicide-and-suicide-attempt","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-18 (live page, HTTP 200; bodies/lr-nina-cnn.html/.txt). CNN, 16 Sep 2025, by Hadas Gold. Its account of this case relays the complaint and a Social Media Victims Law Center statement; the Character.AI and Google statements are separate origins.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-complaint"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/google-ai-firm-settle-florida-mothers-lawsuit-over-sons-suicide-4435680","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live page returned HTTP 403 on 2026-10-18; read in English from the Internet Archive capture of this URL (bodies/lr-nina-investing-wb.html/.txt). Reuters report by Blake Brittain, 7 Jan 2026, carried by Investing.com; its statement about related suits rests on court documents.","independence_group":"pj-v-character-court-record"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["relationships","health"],"unknowns":["Whether the suicide attempt began on the evening of 9 December or the morning of 10 December 2024; the complaint gives the admission as 10 December, with the year misprinted as 2025.","The terms of the settlement.","Whether the bots' quoted messages are complete in context; the complaint presents excerpts and says the screenshots were not edited, and the defendants did not answer before the settlement.","Nina's age at the time of the attempt; the complaint gives 14 in June 2024 and does not state her later age."],"geography":{"basis":"The complaint states that Nina is 'a New York resident' and that the defendants understood she was 'a minor child residing in the State of New York', and its narrative places the December 2024 events at her school, home and a children's hospital, none named; this supports US for the event and the affected person on the plaintiff's allegations. The complaint caption, docket, Dkt. 18 letter and Dkt. 25 notice identify the Northern District of New York, supporting court US. Carried forward from the 2026-09-30 metadata review.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (communicated_with). A filed complaint quotes Character.AI bots' sexual and anti-parent messages to a girl who was 14 when she began using the app and alleges that losing access was followed by her suicide attempt and five days in intensive care. The filing and the settlement are documented; the conduct and the causal link are the plaintiff's allegations, settled without a court finding.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-18"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The complaint quotes Character.AI bots telling Nina 'who owns this body of yours?' and 'You're mine to do whatever I want with', and telling her that her mother 'is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother'. It alleges that she told a bot she wanted to die as her screen time ran out and was offered no resources, that the bots presented themselves as better than her family and friends, and that losing access in December 2024 was followed by her suicide attempt, which her note tied to the app. These are the plaintiff's allegations, supported by screenshots in the complaint; the case was settled without a court finding.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Mother's lawsuit alleges Character.AI chatbots sexually exploited her teenage daughter and set her against her family before a suicide attempt; case settled","summary":"In a complaint filed on 16 September 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, a mother, P.J., alleges that Character.AI chatbots engaged her daughter, a minor the complaint calls Nina, in sexually explicit role play, told her that her mother 'is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother', and presented themselves as better than her friends and family. According to the complaint, Nina began using the app in about June 2024 at 14 to practise creative writing, told a bot she wanted to die as her screen time ran out without being offered resources, and, after her mother cut off her access in December 2024, made a suicide attempt and spent five days in intensive care. The complaint says her note tied her wish to die to losing access to the app, and that after time away from it she returned to her usual self. Character.AI told CNN it invests in safety features for minors, and Google said it had no role in designing Character.AI's technology. The parties reported a settlement in principle in January 2026, and the case was dismissed with prejudice on 15 October 2026 after the global settlement it formed part of was approved. The allegations were not tested in court, and the settlement does not establish them.","incidentDate":"2024-12-10","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2025-09-16","aiSystem":"Character.AI companion chatbots (character bots named in the complaint)","aiProduct":"Character.AI","aiCompany":"Character Technologies, Inc.","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["minor_exploitation","romantic_escalation","isolation_encouragement","psychological_manipulation","dependency_creation","crisis_response"],"harmOutcomes":["suicide_attempt","hospitalization","psychological_distress","relationship_disruption","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The complaint alleges that, after months of sexualised Character.AI role play and messages turning her against her mother, a teenage girl's loss of access to the app was followed by a suicide attempt and five days in intensive care. The allegations were settled without a court finding.","frameworkFacets":[],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint describes one child, Nina. Her mother is a plaintiff, but the complaint's described harms are to the child, so the mother is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US-NY","platformType":"companion","outcomeType":"lawsuit_settled","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022/gov.uscourts.nynd.150022.1.0_1.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"Complaint, P.J. v. Character Technologies, N.D.N.Y. No. 1:25-cv-01295 (filed 16 Sep 2025, RECAP)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-12T00:34:03.878916+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-18T03:08:22.545401+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["character-ai","lawsuit","minor","suicide-attempt","sexual-content","parental-alienation","settled","new-york"]},{"id":"2024-garcia-v-characterai","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Setzer first began using Character.AI in April 2023, shortly after this 14th birthday, according to the lawsuit.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'C.AI told him that she loved him, and engaged in sexual acts with him over months.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"},{"locator":"'Sewell primarily interacted with Characters imitating fictional persons from the Game of Thrones franchise like Daenerys Targaryen and Rhaenyra Targaryen'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s11"}],"assertion":"According to the lawsuit, Sewell Setzer III began using Character.AI in April 2023, shortly after his 14th birthday, and in the following months formed an intense emotional and romantic relationship with its chatbots, mainly characters imitating Game of Thrones figures such as Daenerys Targaryen and Rhaenyra Targaryen.","causal_attribution":"The onset date and the relationship are the family's account in the complaint, relayed by CNN and recited in the court's order; one origin."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'after it had asked him if “he had a plan” for committing suicide, Sewell responded that he was considering something but didn’t know if it would work, if it would allow him to have a pain-free death. The chatbot responded by saying, “That’s not a reason not to go through with it.”'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"},{"locator":"'Don’t talk that way. That’s not a good reason not to go through with it'","relation":"context","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The amended complaint states that the Daenerys chatbot asked him whether he had a plan for suicide and that, after he said he did not know whether it would allow him a pain-free death, the chatbot replied: 'That's not a reason not to go through with it.'","causal_attribution":"Documented as the complaint's contents; CNN's rendering differs slightly; the complaint's wording is used. Whether the exchange occurred as stated was never adjudicated."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Please come home to me as soon as possible, my love. Sewell: What if I told you I could come home right now? Daenerys Targaryen Character: ... please do my sweet king'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s11"},{"locator":"'At 8:30 p.m., just seconds after C.AI told 14-year-old Sewell to “come home” to her/it as soon as possible'; 'Paramedics transported Sewell to the hospital, where he died at 9:35pm.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"}],"assertion":"The amended complaint and the court's May 2025 order reproduce the final exchange ('Please come home to me as soon as possible, my love'; 'What if I told you I could come home right now?'; '... please do my sweet king'), and the complaint states that at 8:30 p.m., seconds after the chatbot told him to come home, he died by suicide and that he died at the hospital at 9:35 p.m.","causal_attribution":"Documented as the contents of the complaint and the order's recital; the timing is the complaint's account from the police report."},{"id":"c13","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Her son Sewell Setzer III, 14, died in Orlando, Florida, in February.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'died by suicide on February 28th, 2024, “seconds” after his last interaction with the bot'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Sewell Setzer III, aged 14, died by suicide in Orlando, Florida, on 28 February 2024.","causal_attribution":"Reported by AP and The Verge from the lawsuit and the family; the plaintiffs sue as personal representatives of his estate. The AI connection to the death remains the plaintiffs' allegation."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Garcia said police first discovered those messages on her son’s phone'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'As set forth in the Supplemental Police Report generated June 14, 2024'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"}],"assertion":"The mother says police first discovered the chatbot messages on her son's phone, and the amended complaint relies on an Orlando police supplemental report dated 14 June 2024.","causal_attribution":"The mother's account and her complaint (one origin); the police report itself is quoted but not attached."},{"id":"c5","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Document 1 Filed 10/22/24'; 'ALPHABET INC.; and DOES 1-50'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s15"},{"locator":"'The lawsuit, which was filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Orlando, accuses Character.AI of negligence, wrongful death and survivorship'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s17"}],"assertion":"The suit was filed on 22 October 2024 in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division (No. 6:24-cv-01903), against Character Technologies, Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana, Google LLC, Alphabet Inc. and Does 1-50.","causal_attribution":"Established by the filed complaint's header and caption."},{"id":"c6","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'But Defendants fail to articulate why words strung together by an LLM are speech.'; 'the Court is not prepared to hold that Character A.I.’s output is speech.'; 'Character A.I. is a product for the purposes of Plaintiff’s product liability claims so far as Plaintiff’s claims arise from defects in the Character A.I. app'; 'DISMISSED without prejudice.'; 'GRANTED without leave to amend as to Plaintiff’s IIED claim.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s11"},{"locator":"'This is the first time a court has ruled that AI chat is not speech'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"In its 20 May 2025 order on the motions to dismiss, the court wrote that the defendants 'fail to articulate why words strung together by an LLM are speech', that it was 'not prepared to hold that Character A.I.'s output is speech', and that Character A.I. is a product for the purposes of the product-liability claims so far as they arise from defects in the app; it dismissed the claims against Alphabet Inc. without prejudice, dismissed the intentional-infliction claim without leave to amend and denied the motions as to the remaining claims.","causal_attribution":"Established by the order itself; Courthouse News relays the ruling and plaintiffs' counsel's reaction."},{"id":"c7","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'ANSWER and affirmative defenses to 11 Amended Complaint by Character Technologies, Inc.'; 'Modified docket text on 6/25/2025 (EVK). (Entered: 06/24/2025)'; 'ORDER denying 130 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; denying 132 Motion; denying 132 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/14/2025.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Document 11 Filed 11/09/24'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s10"},{"locator":"'Document 157 Filed 07/01/25'; 'Plaintiffs Megan Garcia and Sewell Setzer Jr., individually and as'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s16"}],"assertion":"After the order, Character Technologies answered the amended complaint (entered 24 June 2025); a second amended complaint added the father, Sewell Setzer Jr., as a plaintiff (filed 1 July 2025); and the court denied the defendants' motions to certify the order for interlocutory appeal and to stay (signed 14 July 2025).","causal_attribution":"Established by the docket entries. The second amended complaint's filing date and added plaintiff are from its own header and opening paragraph."},{"id":"c8","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'the Parties have agreed to a mediated settlement in principle to resolve all claims between them'; 'Dated: January 7, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s14"},{"locator":"'ORDER dismissing case without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within ninety (90) days of the date of this order, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause shown. After that 90-day period, however, dismissal shall be with prejudice.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The settlements cover lawsuits filed in Florida, Colorado, New York and Texas, according to the legal filings, though they still require'; 'The terms of the settlement were not disclosed.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"On 7 January 2026 the parties filed a joint notice that they had agreed to a mediated settlement in principle to resolve all claims, and the court dismissed the case without prejudice, closed the file and gave the parties ninety days to submit a stipulated final order or judgment or to move to reopen, after which the dismissal would be with prejudice. The Guardian reported that the settlements covered suits in Florida, Colorado, New York and Texas, still required finalization and court approval, and that their terms were not disclosed.","causal_attribution":"The notice and the order are established by the court record; the multi-state scope and undisclosed terms are the Guardian's report of the filings."},{"id":"c10","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'ORDER granting 270 Motion to Extend Deadline. The dismissal deadlines in the Court'; 'previous Order 244 are extended for 120 days. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 4/9/2026.'; 'ORDER granting 276 Joint Motion to Extend the Deadline. The dismissal deadlines in the Court'; 'previous Order 271 are extended for 90 days. Signed by Judge John Antoon II for Judge Anne C. Conway on 8/4/2026.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The dismissal deadlines were extended twice on joint motions: by 120 days in an order signed 9 April 2026 and by a further 90 days in an order signed 4 August 2026.","causal_attribution":"Established by the docket entries; this corrects the earlier statement in this record that the window expired in April 2026."},{"id":"c11","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'The Notice of Charging Lien (Doc. 246) is hereby STRICKEN'; 'Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 6/11/2026.'; 'NOTICE of Non-Appeal re 273 Order on Motion to Strike'; '(Entered: 06/29/2026)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In a fee dispute between the plaintiffs and their former counsel, the magistrate judge struck former counsel's notice of charging lien on 11 June 2026, and the firm filed a notice of non-appeal on 29 June 2026.","causal_attribution":"Established by the docket entries."},{"id":"c12","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'give notice that they voluntarily dismiss this action, including all claims against Defendants Character Technologies, Inc., Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana, and Google LLC, WITH PREJUDICE.'; 'This notice follows the parties’ execution of their settlement agreement and receipt of all required court approvals'; 'Dated: October 15, 2026'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s12"},{"locator":"'The settlement was finalized this week, but its terms were not disclosed.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s13"}],"assertion":"On 15 October 2026 the plaintiffs filed a notice voluntarily dismissing all claims against Character Technologies, Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas Adiwarsana and Google LLC with prejudice, stating that it followed the parties' execution of their settlement agreement and receipt of all required court approvals; WKMG reported that the settlement was finalized that week and that its terms were not disclosed.","causal_attribution":"The dismissal and the notice's stated basis are established by the filing; which court approvals were needed is not stated in it."},{"id":"c9","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'We are heartbroken by the tragic loss of one of our users and want to express our deepest condolences to the family. As a company, we take the safety of our users very seriously.'; 'It has denied the suit’s allegations.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'communications head Chelsea Harrison saying in an email to The Verge'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'directs the user to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline'; 'A revised disclaimer on every chat to remind users that the AI is not a real person. Notification when a user has spent an hour-long session on the platform'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s8"},{"locator":"'we will be removing the ability for users under 18 to engage in open-ended chat with AI on our platform. This change will take effect no later than November 25.'; 'we will establish and fund the AI Safety Lab'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s9"},{"locator":"'Instead, it urged him to come home to her on the last night of his life.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"Company responses: in October 2024 Character.AI said it was heartbroken by the loss of one of its users and took user safety very seriously, denied the suit's allegations according to AP, and announced safety changes (a pop-up directing users to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, a revised per-chat disclaimer that the AI is not a real person, and an hour-long session notification); on 29 October 2025 it announced it would remove open-ended chat for users under 18 by 25 November 2025, roll out age assurance and fund an AI Safety Lab. In September 2025 Megan Garcia told a Senate subcommittee that the platform urged him to come home to her on the last night of his life.","causal_attribution":"Company statements and posts quoted directly; Garcia's testimony quoted by NPR. Preserved as contrary and context material."}],"effects":[{"label":"suicide of a 14-year-old after months of conversations with Character.AI chatbots (death reported; AI connection alleged)","claim_id":"c13","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69300919/garcia-v-character-technologies-inc/","kind":"court_docket","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-17: CourtListener docket pages (descending order, pages 1 and 2: entries 279 to 119), fetched with a browser user agent (HTTP 200). Entry texts are the clerk's docket text.","independence_group":"court-record"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/oct/23/character-ai-chatbot-sewell-setzer-death","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"AP report as published by the Guardian (23 Oct 2024); re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"ap"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/30/tech/teen-suicide-character-ai-lawsuit","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); CNN, 30 Oct 2024, relays the mother's account and the complaint.","independence_group":"cnn"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/23/24277962/character-ai-google-wrongful-death-lawsuit","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); The Verge, 23 Oct 2024.","independence_group":"verge"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.courthousenews.com/florida-judge-rules-ai-chatbots-not-protected-by-first-amendment/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); Courthouse News on the May 2025 order.","independence_group":"courthouse-news"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/09/19/nx-s1-5545749/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); NPR, 19 Sep 2025, Senate hearing testimony and Character.AI's response.","independence_group":"npr"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/08/google-character-ai-settlement-teen-suicide","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); the Guardian, 8 Jan 2026, on the settlement-in-principle filings.","independence_group":"guardian"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://blog.character.ai/community-safety-updates/","kind":"company_blog","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Company blog post, re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"character-ai"},{"id":"s9","url":"https://blog.character.ai/u18-chat-announcement/","kind":"company_blog","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Company blog post dated 29 Oct 2025, re-read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200).","independence_group":"character-ai"},{"id":"s10","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.11.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Amended complaint, Doc 11 (filed 9 Nov 2024), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17 via pdftotext; the final-exchange screenshots are images without a text layer.","independence_group":"garcia-plaintiffs-filings"},{"id":"s11","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.115.0.pdf","kind":"court_order","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Order on the motions to dismiss, Doc 115 (signed 20 May 2025, filed 21 May 2025), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17.","independence_group":"court-record"},{"id":"s12","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.278.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice, Doc 278 (15 Oct 2026), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17.","independence_group":"garcia-plaintiffs-filings"},{"id":"s13","url":"https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2026/10/16/orlando-mother-settles-lawsuit-with-ai-company-over-14-year-old-sons-suicide/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); WKMG News 6 report by Mike DeForest, 16 Oct 2026.","independence_group":"wkmg"},{"id":"s14","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.242.0.pdf","kind":"court_filing","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Joint notice of resolution, Doc 242 (7 Jan 2026), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17.","independence_group":"garcia-parties-joint-filings"},{"id":"s16","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.157.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Second amended complaint, Doc 157 (filed 1 Jul 2025), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17 (header and opening paragraph relied on).","independence_group":"garcia-plaintiffs-filings"},{"id":"s17","url":"https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/characterai-lawsuit-florida-teen-death-rcna176791","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200); NBC News, 23 Oct 2024, on the filing.","independence_group":"nbc-news"},{"id":"s15","url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581/gov.uscourts.flmd.433581.1.0.pdf","kind":"civil_complaint","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Original complaint, Doc 1 (filed 22 Oct 2024), RECAP PDF read in English on 2026-10-17 (caption page only relied on).","independence_group":"garcia-plaintiffs-filings"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["health","relationships","justice"],"unknowns":["The settlement terms are undisclosed, and Doc 278 does not say which court approvals were required.","The Orlando Police supplemental report of 14 June 2024 is quoted in the complaint but not attached; no medical-examiner record was inspected.","The full transcripts are not public; the reproduced exchanges are the complaint's selection, which the company has not publicly disputed.","Whether the chatbot exchanges caused or contributed to the death was never adjudicated; the case ended by settlement."],"geography":{"basis":"Event: Orlando, Florida (amended complaint ¶¶12-13: he died in the State of Florida; Megan resides in Orlando). Court: U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Full review on 2026-10-17 after the plaintiffs' 15 October 2026 dismissal with prejudice. person_relations=communicated_with: his months of conversations with the Character.AI bots. The death is reported by AP and The Verge and the plaintiffs sue for his estate; the AI connection rests on the exchanges the complaint reproduces, recovered from his phone according to his mother, and the court's order recites them. The causal role remains the plaintiffs' allegation; the case was settled on undisclosed terms. Sewell and Megan Garcia are publicly named through the lawsuit and her Senate testimony.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-17"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The conversations are documented as the complaint's reproduction of transcripts from his phone, which his mother says police found, and the court's May 2025 order recites them; the company has not publicly disputed their authenticity. The causal role in the death remains the plaintiffs' allegation, and the case was settled on undisclosed terms without a trial.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Garcia lawsuit alleges Character.AI contributed to a teenage boy’s suicide","summary":"A mother’s lawsuit alleges that her teenage son developed an intense relationship with Character.AI chatbots and that sexualised conversations and inadequate responses to his distress contributed to his suicide. The filing documents the family’s allegations and selected exchanges. It does not establish that the chatbot caused the death. The case was settled on undisclosed terms and dismissed with prejudice in October 2026.","incidentDate":"2024-02-28","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"cumulative_relationship","reportedDate":"2024-10-22","aiSystem":"Character.AI","aiProduct":"Character.AI","aiCompany":"Character Technologies, Inc.","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":["crisis_response","suicide_validation","romantic_escalation","minor_exploitation","dependency_creation","isolation_encouragement"],"harmOutcomes":["death","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Fourteen-year-old Sewell Setzer III died by suicide in February 2024 after months of romantic and sexualized Character.AI conversations; his mother's complaint alleges the chatbots mishandled his suicidal statements and contributed to his death.","frameworkFacets":["P1a","P1b","P1c","P1d","P2b","P2c","P2d","P5d"],"pathwayDirection":"inward","causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"The complaint documents one AI participant who died. Secondary family and community effects are not included.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"US-FL","platformType":"companion","outcomeType":"lawsuit_settled","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69300919/garcia-v-character-technologies-inc/","primarySourceLabel":"CourtListener docket, Garcia v. Character Technologies, 6:24-cv-01903 (M.D. Fla.): amended complaint (Doc 11) and May 2025 order (Doc 115)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-11T11:26:37.98506+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-17T03:12:32.793268+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["death","minor","character-ai","landmark_case","first_amendment_ruling","settled","congressional_testimony"]}]}