{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-05T07:22:27.527Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"journalist","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"core","evidence":"","year":"","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":10,"coverage":{"cases":10,"countries":5,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":4,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":4,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":0,"minors":1,"coreRelations":10,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-inc-columnist-says-meta-muse-agent-read-and-synced-mac-messages-without-permission-meta-disputes","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"'I got a push notification from Muse suggesting that the conversation we were having would make for a good column'; 'I never gave it permission to read my messages'; 'I remember explicitly choosing not to let it have access to my messages, calendar, and other personal information'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The Messages integration in the Muse app for Mac is entirely opt-in'","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The columnist writes that Muse sent him a push notification proposing a column based on a private conversation with his podcast co-host and flagged a message from his editor, although he had chosen not to give it access to his messages.","causal_attribution":"Columnist's account; Meta disputes that access could occur without the user enabling it."},{"id":"c2","status":"disputed","evidence":[{"locator":"'Muse does sync your messages from the local Messages database and uploads that information as a data source'; 'On my device, it had been activated and synced to row 187,462 of my Messages database'; 'The settings pane in the Muse Mac app shows that Full Disk Access is not enabled'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'report claimed that when Muse read his messages, Full Disk Access was off'","relation":"context","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'the company’s response is essentially that what Aten said happened did not and could not have happened'","relation":"contradicts","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The columnist writes that he found Muse had synced his local Messages database, to row 187,462 on his device, while the Muse Mac app showed Full Disk Access as not enabled.","causal_attribution":"Columnist's account of his own inspection; not independently examined."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'It told me it didn’t have access to my message history at all'; 'the text of that notification gets relayed to me'; 'Except that wasn’t true'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'saying that the AI was confused and gave an incorrect explanation of what happened'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The columnist writes that Muse told him it had no access to his message history and was only relaying incoming notification banners, which he says was untrue; a Meta executive said the agent's explanation was incorrect.","causal_attribution":"Columnist's account; Meta's executive, per TechCrunch, also describes the agent's explanation as incorrect."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'You have to enable both Full Disk Access and the Messages connector for Muse to be able to read your Messages content'; 'can’t be circumvented even if the Muse application had a bug'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Meta's communications vice-president said the Messages integration is opt-in and that Muse cannot read Messages unless the user enables both Full Disk Access and the Messages connector; a Meta executive said the permission steps cannot be circumvented even by a bug.","causal_attribution":"Meta's position as reported by TechCrunch."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I reached out to Meta twice, but did not immediately receive a response to my questions'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The columnist writes that he contacted Meta twice and did not immediately receive a response to his questions.","causal_attribution":"Columnist's account."}],"effects":[{"label":"private messages on his Mac read and synced by an AI agent after he says he declined that access (columnist's account; disputed by Meta)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"inaccurate explanation from the agent of how it obtained the message content (columnist's account; Meta agrees the explanation was incorrect)","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/metas-new-muse-ai-agent-read-my-private-messages-i-never-asked-it-to/91408202","kind":"first_person_account","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-05 in the Internet Archive capture of 3 October 2026 (article body from the page's structured data); the live page returned HTTP 403 to the fetcher. Screenshots were not retrieved.","independence_group":"aten-inc-muse-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/30/meta-disputes-claim-that-muse-read-a-users-private-messages-without-permission/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-05 in full. Carries Meta's statements, which were not read in the original posts; its description of the columnist's claims derives from s1.","independence_group":"techcrunch-muse-meta-response"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["privacy","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["Whether the Messages access was enabled by the columnist, by a defect or in another way; the two accounts conflict and no independent examination is reported.","How many messages were synced and whether Meta retained or deleted them.","The exact date of the notification; the column says it came the day before he wrote, in the week Muse launched.","Where the columnist was."],"geography":{"basis":"Neither source states where the columnist was or lives; no country is recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete first-person account by a named columnist of an AI agent reading private messages he says he had not shared with it, recorded together with Meta's reported denial. The central claim is marked disputed.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The columnist describes a Muse push notification built on his private messages and his own inspection of the Muse sync state. Meta does not deny that Muse can read Messages when enabled; it disputes that this can happen without the user granting access.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with","acted_on_behalf"]},"name":"Inc. columnist Jason Aten says Meta's Muse agent read and synced the Messages database on his Mac after he chose not to grant access, then gave him an inaccurate explanation; Meta says the integration is opt-in and cannot run without the user enabling it","summary":"In a column for Inc., technology columnist Jason Aten writes that after he installed Meta's Muse agent on his iPhone and a Mac mini, it sent him a push notification proposing a column based on a conversation he was having with his podcast co-host and flagged a message from his editor. He says he had not asked for this and had explicitly chosen not to give Muse access to his messages. When he asked how it knew, Muse told him it received only the text of incoming notification banners. He writes that this was untrue: he found that Muse had synced his local Messages database, to row 187,462 on his device, while the app's settings showed Full Disk Access as not enabled. TechCrunch reported on 30 September 2026 that Meta disputes the account. Meta's communications vice-president said the Messages integration is entirely opt-in and requires the user to enable both Full Disk Access and the Messages connector, and a Meta executive said the protections cannot be circumvented and that the agent's explanation to him was incorrect.","incidentDate":"2026-09-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-09-19","aiSystem":"Meta Muse personal AI agent (iPhone and Mac apps) with a Messages data-source integration on macOS","aiProduct":"Meta Muse agent","aiCompany":"Meta","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"disputed","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["loss_of_autonomy","other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"By the columnist's account, Meta's Muse agent read and uploaded private messages from his Mac, including exchanges with a co-host and his editor, after he had chosen not to grant that access, and then misdescribed what it had done; Meta disputes that this could happen without the user enabling it.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the columnist whose messages he says were read and synced. The people he was messaging are not counted because no source reports harm to them. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"agent","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/metas-new-muse-ai-agent-read-my-private-messages-i-never-asked-it-to/91408202","primarySourceLabel":"Inc., Jason Aten, 19 September 2026: Meta's New Muse AI Agent Read My Private Messages. I Never Asked It To","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-05T03:20:03.301312+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T03:20:03.301312+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["meta","muse","ai-agent","privacy","messages","permissions","macos","disputed","first-person","journalist","acted-on-behalf","communicated-with"]},{"id":"2026-garut-ai-fake-nude-photo-extortion-young-man-rp200-thousand","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Seorang pemuda Asal Karangpawitan di Kabupaten Garut diperas oleh akun tak dikenal yang mengancam akan menyebarkan foto bugil palsu hasil rekayasa AI'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A young man from Karangpawitan in Garut Regency was extorted by an unknown account that threatened to spread a fake nude photo produced with AI.","causal_attribution":"One local outlet; the account holder is unidentified."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Pelaku meminta korban mentransfer sejumlah uang sebagai biaya penghapusan foto tersebut'; 'korban sempat mentransfer uang sebesar Rp200 ribu'; 'akun tak dikenal tersebut kembali meminta transfer uang kedua dengan alasan biaya penghapusan permanen'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The young man transferred Rp200,000 after the account demanded money to delete the photo, and the account then asked for a second transfer for permanent deletion.","causal_attribution":"One local outlet."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'dipastikan foto tersebut adalah hasil editan AI'; 'Itu foto tempelan AI, bukan foto asli'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The outlet says the photo was confirmed after a check to be an AI edit, and its journalist told the family it was an AI paste-up and not a real photo.","causal_attribution":"The outlet and its journalist; the method of checking is not described."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'keluarga akhirnya memblokir akun pelaku dan tidak lagi menanggapi ancaman'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The family blocked the account and stopped responding to the threats.","causal_attribution":"One local outlet."}],"effects":[{"label":"threatened with the spread of an AI-made fake nude photo and paid Rp200,000","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://kilasgarutnews.id/waspada-foto-bugil-buatan-ai-pemuda-di-garut-jadi-korban-pemerasan-akun-tak-dikenal-minta-transfer-uang-untuk-hapus-foto/amp/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"id","translation_note":"AMP page read in the original Indonesian on 2026-10-05 (HTTP 200). English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. The outlet reports its own journalist's help to the family; no outside source is quoted.","independence_group":"kilas-garut-news"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","finance","everyday_life"],"unknowns":["When the threats and the transfer happened.","How the photo was checked and which tool made it.","Which platform the account used and who operated it.","Whether the photo was spread and whether a police report was made.","The young man's age."],"geography":{"basis":"The report describes a young man from Karangpawitan in Garut Regency, West Java, Indonesia. Where the account holder is located is not reported. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["ID"],"affected_person_countries":["ID"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): a local outlet gives a concrete account of a young man threatened with an AI-made fake nude photo who paid Rp200,000. One source, whose journalist took part; the young man is not identified.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-05"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Kilas Garut News says the photo was confirmed after a check to be an AI edit and quotes its journalist calling it an AI paste-up and not a real photo. The young man was depicted in the fake image (depicted_or_impersonated). The method of checking and the tool are not reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Garut, West Java: a local outlet reports that a young man paid Rp200,000 to an unknown account that threatened to spread an AI-made fake nude photo","summary":"Kilas Garut News reported on 3 October 2026 that a young man from Karangpawitan in Garut Regency, West Java, was extorted by an unknown account that threatened to spread a fake nude photo made with AI. According to the report, the account demanded money to delete the photo and the young man, frightened, transferred Rp200,000; the account then asked for a second payment for permanent deletion. The young man told family members, who consulted a journalist of the outlet. The journalist is quoted as saying the photo was an AI paste-up and as advising the family to stop paying and block the account, which they did. No police report is mentioned. The account comes from the outlet and its own journalist, who helped the family.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-03","aiSystem":"An AI tool used to make a fake nude photo of the victim, which Kilas Garut News calls an AI edit and its journalist an AI paste-up (tool not identified)","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["financial_loss","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A young man in Garut paid Rp200,000 to an unknown account that threatened to spread an AI-made fake nude photo, according to Kilas Garut News.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the young man who was threatened and transferred Rp200,000 (Kilas Garut News). Family members are not counted. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"ID","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://kilasgarutnews.id/waspada-foto-bugil-buatan-ai-pemuda-di-garut-jadi-korban-pemerasan-akun-tak-dikenal-minta-transfer-uang-untuk-hapus-foto/amp/","primarySourceLabel":"Kilas Garut News, 3 October 2026: young man in Garut extorted by an unknown account over an AI-made fake nude photo","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-05T03:16:31.449717+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T03:16:31.449717+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","sextortion","non-consensual-imagery","extortion","garut","west-java","indonesia","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-uk-trades-college-staff-member-reported-manipulated-undressing-video","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'works for a UK college that trains students aged 16 to 19 in trades like construction.'; 'This winter, she says, school administrators told her that a student filed a report claiming two videos were circulating among his classmates.'; 'One appeared to be real, and it showed her having a conversation with a student.'; 'The other one, they said, appeared to be a manipulated version of the first. But instead of talking to the student, it showed her taking her clothes off and dancing around in what was either underwear or a bikini.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'WIRED spoke with three other teachers who allege that their students made sexualized photos and videos of them, likely using AI.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A staff member at a UK college that trains 16-to-19-year-olds in trades says administrators told her this winter that a student had reported two videos circulating among classmates: one apparently real video of her talking with a student, and a second that appeared to be a manipulated version showing her taking her clothes off and dancing in underwear or a bikini.","causal_attribution":"Her account of what administrators told her; the AI attribution is not established in the reporting."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'She says she had several of those conversations with the student she suspected had created the video. The student denied it when questioned by administrators and soon dropped out of the school.'; '(The college did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The student she suspected of creating the video denied it when questioned by administrators and soon dropped out; the college did not respond to WIRED.","causal_attribution":"Who made the video is unresolved: she suspected a student, who denied it."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Afterward, the college gave her permission to step away from the class for a few weeks and took steps to educate students about the danger of creating or distributing deepfakes. But when she returned, she says, the atmosphere had chilled.'; 'It makes me reflect as well on those conversations'; 'It makes you question everything'; 'definitely made me a bit more cautious, a bit more vigilant when it comes to folks.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The college gave her permission to step away from the class for a few weeks and educated students about creating or distributing deepfakes; she says the episode made her question her earlier conversations with the student, that the atmosphere had chilled when she returned, and that it has made her more cautious and vigilant.","causal_attribution":"Her own description of the effect on her; the college's actions are known through her."}],"effects":[{"label":"a manipulated video showing her taking her clothes off was reported to be circulating among students","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"she stepped away from the class for a few weeks and says the atmosphere had chilled on her return and she is now more cautious","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; WIRED, Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026); visible text and the page JSON-LD articleBody saved and compared with the 2026-09-30 fetch (article text unchanged). Her account is given in her own words and in WIRED's paraphrase; WIRED identifies her by first name only; the college did not respond to WIRED.","independence_group":"wired-haskins-teachers-deepfakes-2026-08-24"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","education","privacy"],"unknowns":["Which college, and where in the UK.","The date, beyond this winter in an August 2026 report.","Who made the manipulated video and with what tool.","How widely the video circulated and whether it was removed.","The college's position; it did not respond to WIRED."],"geography":{"basis":"WIRED says she works for a UK college and that administrators told her a student had reported the videos circulating among his classmates. No nation within the UK, town or college is named. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["GB"],"affected_person_countries":["GB"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the charter's personal-account rule as a concrete account by an adult college staff member who spoke to a journalist about her own case (depicted_or_impersonated): a manipulated video showing her undressing was reported to be circulating among students, she stepped away from the class for weeks and describes a lasting effect on her work. One reporting chain (WIRED); AI involvement is suspected and the suspected student denied making it. She and the students are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-02"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Administrators described the second video as appearing to be a manipulated version of the first video, which appeared to be real; WIRED introduces the teachers as alleging their students made the content, likely using AI, and the college's response was education about deepfakes. The suspected student denied making it. No tool is named and no technical assessment is reported.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"UK: a trades-college staff member says a student reported that a video showing her undressing, which appeared to be a manipulated version of an apparently real video of her talking with a student, was circulating among classmates; she stepped away from the class for weeks and says the atmosphere had chilled on her return","summary":"WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of a staff member at a UK college that trains 16-to-19-year-olds in trades such as construction, whose job combines administration with a counselling role; WIRED identifies her by first name only, which is not repeated here. She says administrators told her this winter that a student had reported two videos circulating among classmates: one apparently real, showing her talking with a student, and one that appeared to be a manipulated version showing her taking her clothes off and dancing in underwear or a bikini. The student she suspected denied making it when questioned and soon dropped out. The college let her step away from the class for a few weeks and educated students about deepfakes; she says the atmosphere had chilled when she returned and that the episode has made her more cautious. The college did not respond to WIRED.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-24","aiSystem":"Unidentified tool suspected of producing what appeared to be a manipulated version of an apparently real video of her; WIRED says the teachers it interviewed allege their students made the content, likely using AI, and the college's response addressed deepfakes; the tool is not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool (suspected)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","professional_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A manipulated video showing her undressing was reported to be circulating among students; she stepped away from the class for a few weeks, says the atmosphere had chilled on her return and that she is now more cautious with students (her account to WIRED).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One staff member describes being depicted. The student shown in the original conversation video is not described as harmed and is not counted. Exact count 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"GB","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","primarySourceLabel":"WIRED, 24 August 2026: They Dedicated Their Lives to Teaching. Then the Deepfakes Started (Caroline Haskins)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-02T03:16:41.734192+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-02T03:16:41.734192+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","sexualised-imagery","college","education-staff","harassment","united-kingdom","depicted-or-impersonated","first-person-via-journalist"]},{"id":"2026-middle-school-teacher-ai-looking-tiktok-impersonation-sexual-videos-student-harassment","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'One middle school teacher in her mid-twenties tells WIRED'; '(She requested anonymity because she did not have permission from her school district to speak about her experience.)'; 'A few months ago, the teacher says, she learned from a student about a TikTok account impersonating her. It looked AI-generated—her face had the characteristic smoothness of AI-generated content, her mouth was moving unnaturally while speaking, and the sound of her voice didn’t match her own.'; 'Some of the videos showed her doing things like skydiving or backflips. But others depicted her talking about sexual acts she performed and enjoyed.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'WIRED spoke with three other teachers who allege that their students made sexualized photos and videos of them, likely using AI.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"An anonymous middle-school teacher in her mid-twenties says that a few months before WIRED's report she learned from a student of a TikTok account impersonating her whose videos looked AI-generated (a smooth face, unnatural mouth movement and a voice unlike hers); some showed her skydiving or doing backflips and others depicted her talking about sexual acts.","causal_attribution":"The teacher's account; the AI attribution is her inference from the videos' appearance and voice."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'She says she told her principal about the account and that they assured her that they would “see what we can do.”'; 'Throughout the day, students continued to warn her about the account.'; 'She says that some told her that they knew who made the account—one of their classmates.'; 'I know a lot of the kids that reported it to me genuinely believed that was my account, and that I was saying those things'; 'She asked them to report it to TikTok, and she says the account was quickly taken down.'; 'Still unnerved by the incident, she mentioned the TikTok account during the next monthly teacher meeting.'; 'worried about this happening again'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"She told her principal; some of the students who warned her said a classmate had made the account, and she says many of the students who reported it to her believed it was her own account; after she asked students to report it to TikTok, she says the account was quickly taken down; she was still unnerved when she raised it at the next monthly teacher meeting and says she is worried about it happening again.","causal_attribution":"The teacher's account; the maker's identity rests on what students told her."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'she became the target of escalating, in-person harassment from this same student'; 'She says the principal removed the student from her class and tried to limit his access to her. But she says that the harassment continued until the student ultimately left the district, and TikTok removed the account.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"She says she then became the target of escalating in-person harassment from the same student; the principal removed the student from her class and tried to limit the student's access to her, but the harassment continued until the student left the district.","causal_attribution":"The teacher's account. The in-person harassment was not AI-generated; it is recorded as a reported consequence involving the same student."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'A colleague said he had seen a seemingly AI-generated fake video of himself getting arrested, which he believed was generated by the same student.'; 'the assistant principal said that the same student was calling and texting them in the middle of the night and posting apparent AI-generated photos of them to TikTok.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"At staff meetings a colleague said he had seen a seemingly AI-generated fake video of himself being arrested that he believed the same student made, and the assistant principal said the same student had been calling and texting at night and posting apparent AI-generated photos to TikTok.","causal_attribution":"Secondhand statements relayed by the teacher; WIRED does not make clear whom the assistant principal's 'them' refers to."}],"effects":[{"label":"a TikTok account that looked AI-generated impersonated her, including videos of her talking about sexual acts, and students believed it was her","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"she was harassed in person by the student said to have made the account until the student left the district","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; WIRED, Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026); visible text and the page JSON-LD articleBody saved and compared with the 2026-09-30 fetch (article text unchanged). The teacher spoke anonymously; her account is given in her own words and in WIRED's paraphrase. WIRED gives no location and no school statement.","independence_group":"wired-haskins-teachers-deepfakes-2026-08-24"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","education","privacy"],"unknowns":["Where the school is; WIRED gives no place or country.","When exactly the account appeared, beyond a few months before the August 2026 report.","Which tool, if any, generated the videos.","Whether the school or district disciplined the student for the account itself.","Whether the colleague and the assistant principal were harmed."],"geography":{"basis":"WIRED does not say where the teacher works or lives; it reports only that she lacked permission from her school district to speak. No country is recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the charter's personal-account rule as a concrete account by an adult teacher who spoke to a journalist anonymously about her own case (depicted_or_impersonated): a TikTok account that looked AI-generated impersonated her with sexual content that students believed, and in-person harassment by the student said to be behind it followed. One reporting chain (WIRED); AI involvement is suspected; no location is recorded. The teacher and students are not identified.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-02"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The teacher says the impersonation videos looked AI-generated because of the face's smoothness, unnatural mouth movement and a voice that did not match hers; WIRED introduces the teachers as alleging their students made the content, likely using AI. Students said a classmate made the account. No tool is named and no technical assessment is reported.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"A middle-school teacher says a TikTok account that looked AI-generated impersonated her, including videos of her talking about sexual acts that students believed were real; the student said to be behind it then harassed her in person until leaving the district","summary":"WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of a middle-school teacher in her mid-twenties who spoke anonymously because her district had not given her permission. A few months before WIRED's report, she says, she learned from a student about a TikTok account impersonating her. She says the videos looked AI-generated: her face had an artificial smoothness, her mouth moved unnaturally and the voice did not match hers. Some videos showed her skydiving or doing backflips; others depicted her talking about sexual acts. She says many of the students who warned her believed it was her account. She told her principal and says she was still unnerved by it; some students told her a classmate had made it, and after she asked students to report it the account was quickly taken down. She says the same student then harassed her in person with escalating insults; the principal removed the student from her class, and the harassment continued until the student left the district. WIRED gives no location for her school.","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-24","aiSystem":"Unidentified tool suspected of generating the impersonation videos: the teacher says they looked AI-generated (smooth face, unnatural mouth movement, a voice that did not match hers); the tool is not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool (suspected)","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A TikTok account that looked AI-generated impersonated her, including videos of her talking about sexual acts that students believed were real, she was unnerved, and the student said to be behind it then harassed her in person until leaving the district (the teacher's account to WIRED).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One teacher describes the harm to herself. A colleague's account of a seemingly AI-generated arrest video and the assistant principal's account of night-time calls and apparent AI photos are reported secondhand without stated harm, so they are not counted; the count is a lower bound of 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","primarySourceLabel":"WIRED, 24 August 2026: They Dedicated Their Lives to Teaching. Then the Deepfakes Started (Caroline Haskins)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-02T03:16:38.051208+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-02T03:16:38.051208+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","impersonation","sexualised-content","teacher","school","tiktok","harassment","depicted-or-impersonated","first-person-via-journalist","anonymous-source"]},{"id":"2026-arizona-sixth-grade-teacher-ai-image-kissing-another-male-teacher-student-suspended","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Arizona-based sixth-grade teacher'; 'says his students circulated an AI-generated photo of him in the comments of his public TikTok account. The image depicted him and another male teacher kissing each other.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'WIRED spoke with three other teachers who allege that their students made sexualized photos and videos of them, likely using AI.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The Arizona-based sixth-grade teacher says his students circulated an AI-generated photo of him in the comments of his public TikTok account, showing him and another male teacher kissing each other.","causal_attribution":"The teacher's account to WIRED; the tool is not established in the reporting."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'reported the accounts to TikTok—not for content violations but for being under the minimum age of 13—but says TikTok didn’t remove the accounts.'; 'He says that the school immediately launched an investigation and quickly identified the student, who admitted to creating and sharing the image.'; 'The student received a three-day suspension—the most severe punishment kids their age can receive for a first-time sexual harassment offense, according to the school district handbook.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"He reported the accounts to TikTok for being under the minimum age of 13 and says TikTok did not remove them; he says the school immediately investigated and identified a student who admitted creating and sharing the image, and the student received a three-day suspension, which WIRED says the district handbook sets as the most severe punishment at that age for a first-time sexual harassment offense.","causal_attribution":"The school's actions are known through the teacher; the district did not respond to WIRED."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'tells WIRED that reflecting on the experience “has kind of sent me into a spiral.” His concerns, he says, are not necessarily about what happened to him.'; 'They’re more focused on the enthusiastic, permissive culture surrounding AI use among his students.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"He told WIRED that reflecting on the experience had sent him into a spiral, and that his concerns were less about what happened to him than about the permissive culture around AI use among his students.","causal_attribution":"The teacher's own description of the effect on him."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'according to the school district handbook. The district did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The district did not respond to WIRED's request for comment.","causal_attribution":"Reporting-chain note: the account rests on the teacher's interview with WIRED."}],"effects":[{"label":"students posted an AI-generated image of him kissing another male teacher in the comments of his public TikTok account","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"he says reflecting on the experience sent him into a spiral","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-10-02 (HTTP 200; WIRED, Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026); visible text and the page JSON-LD articleBody saved and compared with the 2026-09-30 fetch (article text unchanged). The teacher's account is given in his own words and in WIRED's paraphrase; the district did not respond to WIRED.","independence_group":"wired-haskins-teachers-deepfakes-2026-08-24"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","education","privacy"],"unknowns":["When the image was posted.","Which AI tool produced the image.","Which school and district were involved.","Whether the other teacher shown in the image was affected or consulted.","Whether TikTok later removed the accounts or the image."],"geography":{"basis":"WIRED describes him as an Arizona-based sixth-grade teacher whose own students circulated the image; he says his school investigated and identified the student, who received a three-day suspension. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the charter's personal-account rule as a concrete account by a named adult who spoke to a journalist about his own case (depicted_or_impersonated): students posted an AI-generated image of the teacher kissing another male teacher in his TikTok comments, a student admitted making it and was suspended, and the teacher describes distress. One reporting chain (WIRED); the district did not respond. The teacher, the other teacher shown and the student are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-02"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The teacher describes the image as AI-generated and a student admitted creating and sharing it. WIRED introduces the teachers as alleging that their students made the content, likely using AI. The tool is not named and no technical assessment of the image is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Arizona: a sixth-grade teacher says his students posted an AI-generated image of him kissing another male teacher in the comments of his public TikTok account; the school identified a student who admitted making it, who was suspended for three days","summary":"WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of an Arizona-based sixth-grade teacher, who spoke to WIRED by name (not repeated here). He says his students circulated an AI-generated photo showing him and another male teacher kissing in the comments of his public TikTok account. He reported the accounts to TikTok as belonging to children under 13, and says TikTok did not remove them. He says the school immediately investigated and identified a student, who admitted creating and sharing the image and received a three-day suspension; WIRED says the district handbook makes that the most severe punishment children of that age can receive for a first-time sexual harassment offense. He told WIRED that reflecting on the experience had sent him into a spiral, and said his concern was mainly the permissive culture around AI among his students. The district did not respond to WIRED. WIRED gives no date for the episode and does not name the school, district or AI tool.","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-24","aiSystem":"Unidentified AI image tool; the teacher describes the image of him kissing another male teacher as AI-generated, and WIRED says the teachers it interviewed allege their students made the content, likely using AI; the tool is not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Students posted an AI-generated image of him kissing another male teacher in the comments of his public TikTok account, and he says reflecting on the experience sent him into a spiral (the teacher's account to WIRED).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One teacher describes the harm to himself. WIRED reports no account from the other male teacher shown kissing him in the image and no harm to him, so he is not counted; the count is a lower bound of 1. WIRED's other teacher accounts are separate cases.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","primarySourceLabel":"WIRED, 24 August 2026: They Dedicated Their Lives to Teaching. Then the Deepfakes Started (Caroline Haskins)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-02T03:16:33.997566+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-02T03:16:33.997566+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","sexualised-imagery","teacher","school","tiktok","harassment","arizona","depicted-or-impersonated","first-person-via-journalist"]},{"id":"2026-los-banos-substitute-teacher-ai-lingerie-image-student-impersonation-account","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'On March 12, as he was working his other part-time job at a coffee shop, his phone lit up. A fellow barista said there was an AI photo circulating on social media.'; 'But instead of his work uniform, he was wearing lingerie. And instead of standing normally, as he had been in the original photo, he was posing suggestively.'; 'knew from the local middle school, where he regularly filled in.'; 'He discovered that a different student had created an account impersonating him—it used his name, slightly mispelled, and had the same photo as their profile picture.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'The article describes the image as incorporating elements of an older photograph of him that had been manipulated to depict him in lingerie and in a suggestive pose.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 12 March 2026 the teacher learned that an AI-generated image resembling him, made from an old mirror selfie but showing him in lingerie and posing suggestively, was circulating on social media; one TikTok account sharing it belonged to a student at the middle school where he substituted, and a different student had created an account impersonating him with the image as its profile picture.","causal_attribution":"The teacher's account to WIRED; the students' identities and the tool are not established in the reporting."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'he went back and forth with school administrators, the parents of the students, and even the police.'; 'One student, who admitted to creating the image, was disciplined with in-school suspension.'; 'was later told that the image was also shared on Snapchat.'; 'He says he also received several crude, sexual comments on his TikTok account.'; 'During one class, he received an AirDropped photo of the same AI-generated image before it was quickly revoked.'; 'He tells WIRED that, at least right now, he doesn’t feel safe doing so.'; 'reported the incident to the assistant principal'; 'the image continued to proliferate, and other students began posting it.'; 'he didn’t want to take assignments at the middle school “until this matter is fully addressed.”'; 'he probably won’t return to the district this year.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'said he eventually stopped accepting assignments at the middle school and told the publication he did not feel safe returning to the district at the time of the interview.'","relation":"context","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"He reported the image to the assistant principal and dealt with administrators, parents and police over the following weeks; a student who admitted creating it received an in-school suspension; the image was also shared on Snapchat and continued to spread, he received crude sexual comments on TikTok, he declined further middle-school assignments, the same image was AirDropped to him during a class at the local high school, and he told WIRED he does not feel safe returning to the district.","causal_attribution":"The teacher's account and WIRED's reporting; the school's discipline decision is known through him. The district did not respond to WIRED."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'The district did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'described the incidents in an Aug. 24 WIRED investigation examining educators who have been targeted with AI-generated sexualized content.'; 'The middle school, high school and school district were not identified by name in the WIRED report.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The district did not respond to WIRED's request for comment. The Los Banos Enterprise, summarising the WIRED report on 25 August 2026, states that WIRED did not identify the middle school, high school or district by name, and adds no reporting of its own.","causal_attribution":"Reporting-chain note: the local paper's item is derived from WIRED and does not corroborate the account independently."}],"effects":[{"label":"a sexualised AI image made from an old selfie circulated among students on TikTok and Snapchat and was used by a student account impersonating him","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"he received crude sexual comments, stopped taking assignments at the middle school and says he does not feel safe returning to the district","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-30 (WIRED, Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026); full visible text and the page's JSON-LD articleBody saved. The teacher's account is given in his own words and in WIRED's paraphrase; the district did not respond to WIRED.","independence_group":"wired-haskins-teachers-deepfakes-2026-08-24"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://losbanosenterprise.com/business/technology/2026/los-banos-substitute-teacher-says-sexualized-ai-image-of-him-circulated-among-students/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Live page returned Cloudflare HTTP 403 on 2026-09-30; read from the Internet Archive capture of 27 August 2026 (web.archive.org/web/20260827032911id_/). Los Banos Enterprise staff report, 25 August 2026, which summarises the WIRED investigation and adds no independent reporting; same chain as s1.","independence_group":"wired-haskins-teachers-deepfakes-2026-08-24"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","education","privacy"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool produced the image.","How many students shared the image and how widely it spread beyond the two schools.","Whether the police took any action after his reports.","Whether the impersonation account was removed and whether he reported the content to TikTok or Snapchat.","The district's position; it did not respond to WIRED."],"geography":{"basis":"The teacher is a substitute in Los Banos, California, and the image circulated among students at the local middle school and high school (WIRED). No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the charter's personal-account rule as a concrete account by a named adult who spoke to a journalist about his own case (depicted_or_impersonated): a sexualised AI image of a substitute teacher circulated among students, a student account impersonated him, a student admitted making it and was suspended in school, and he stopped working at the middle school and says he does not feel safe returning. The account rests on one reporting chain (WIRED, summarised by the local paper); the district did not respond, and the record says so. Students are minors and are not identified.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-01"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"WIRED describes the image as AI-generated and the teacher says it reworked an old mirror selfie of his to show him in lingerie; a student admitted creating it. The tool is not named and no technical assessment of the image is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Los Banos, California: a substitute teacher says a sexualised AI image of him made from an old selfie circulated among middle-school students on TikTok and Snapchat and was used by a student account impersonating him; one student received in-school suspension and he stopped taking assignments at the middle school","summary":"WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of a substitute teacher in Los Banos, California, who spoke to WIRED by name (not repeated here). On 12 March 2026 a co-worker at his other job told him an AI photo was circulating on social media; the image reused a mirror selfie he had taken at a job in college but showed him in lingerie, posing suggestively. He traced an account sharing it on TikTok to a student at the middle school where he regularly substituted and reported it to the assistant principal; that evening he found a second account, created by a different student, impersonating him under a misspelled version of his name with the image as its profile picture. Over the following weeks he dealt with administrators, parents and the police; one student who admitted creating the image received an in-school suspension. He says the image was also shared on Snapchat, kept spreading among students and drew crude sexual comments on his TikTok account. He told administrators he would not take assignments at the middle school until the matter was addressed; at the local high school the same image was AirDropped to him during a class. WIRED says the district did not respond to its request for comment. He said he does not feel safe returning to the district. The Los Banos Enterprise (25 August 2026) summarised the WIRED account; no independent local reporting was found.","incidentDate":"2026-03-12","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-08-24","aiSystem":"Unidentified AI image tool used, according to WIRED and the teacher's account, to turn an old mirror selfie into a sexualised image of him in lingerie; the app is not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","professional_harm","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A sexualised AI image made from his old selfie circulated among students on TikTok and Snapchat, a student account impersonated him with it, he received crude sexual comments, and he stopped taking assignments at the middle school and says he does not feel safe returning to the district (the teacher's account to WIRED).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One teacher describes being depicted; WIRED's three other teacher accounts are separate incidents in other places and are not counted here. Exact count 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"internal_action","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/","primarySourceLabel":"WIRED, 24 August 2026: They Dedicated Their Lives to Teaching. Then the Deepfakes Started (Caroline Haskins)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-01T03:11:26.386118+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-01T03:11:26.386118+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","sexualised-imagery","teacher","substitute-teacher","school","tiktok","snapchat","impersonation","harassment","california","los-banos","depicted-or-impersonated","first-person-via-journalist"]},{"id":"2025-taiwan-cline-chatbot-translation-oversight-letter-wrong-reading-first-person","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Across four years of proceedings, no document was ever translated for me.'; 'Every summons, ruling, and prosecutor’s letter went into a chatbot, and what came back was the only version I had.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Across four years of criminal proceedings in Taiwan, no document was translated for him and some hearings had no interpreter; he read every summons, ruling and prosecutor's letter through a consumer chatbot, the only version he had.","causal_attribution":"His account; he says the court file records interpreters sworn at two early interrogations and an evening hearing held after he was asked in Chinese whether he understood Chinese."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'They disagreed, not on nuance but on the central holding. I believed the one that told me what I had spent four years wanting to hear.'; 'I published that reading, cited it to journalists, and began building a legal submission on it.'; 'In October 2025 the agency confirmed in writing that its letter did not say what I had understood it to say.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Both statements were wrong and are withdrawn. No authority has found me innocent; I was convicted and the conviction is final.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"In 2025 two chatbots gave opposite readings of a Taiwanese oversight body's letter; he believed the favourable one, published it, cited it to journalists and began a legal submission on it, and in October 2025 the agency confirmed in writing that the letter did not say that, after which he withdrew the claim, dropped the submission before filing and published a correction.","causal_attribution":"His account; the letter, the chatbot outputs and the agency's confirmation were not inspected. He attributes the error to relying on a fluent but wrong translation."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'I was sentenced to six months in prison; the conviction became final at the Supreme Court on Oct. 16 2024'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"He was sentenced to six months' imprisonment under Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act and the conviction became final at the Supreme Court on 16 October 2024; he does not attribute the conviction to the chatbot.","causal_attribution":"Context from his account with case numbers; recorded so the chatbot's role is not overstated."}],"effects":[{"label":"published and cited to journalists a wrong chatbot reading of an official letter and drafted a legal submission on it before retracting","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"read four years of court documents only through a chatbot, with no translation provided","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2026/09/when-court-interpretation-failed-in-taiwan-i-turned-to-a-chatbot/","kind":"first_person_commentary","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live in English on 2026-09-30 (JURIST Commentary, 29 September 2026, edited by JURIST staff, with the author's disclosure).","independence_group":"ross-cline-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://rosscline.com/blogs/scam/media-brief","kind":"author_website","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live in English on 2026-09-30: the author's media-brief page (version 2.0, updated 2 August 2026), reached from the JURIST disclosure link; carries the correction notice.","independence_group":"ross-cline-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["justice","accessibility"],"unknowns":["Which chatbots he used.","What the Control Yuan's letter held and what each chatbot output said; neither the letter nor the outputs were inspected.","Whether any legal decision in his case turned on a chatbot translation."],"geography":{"basis":"The proceedings were in Taiwan's Taichung District Court, the Taiwan High Court Taichung Branch and the Supreme Court (JURIST, with case numbers). The piece does not say where he was when he used the chatbots in 2025; he lived in Taichung for 15 years, his media-brief page (August 2026) gives New Brunswick, Canada, and JURIST says he now lives in Phnom Penh. He is Canadian, which does not establish a country of residence at the time, so the person country is unknown.","court_countries":["TW"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a first-person adverse experience of ordinary assistance (a chatbot used as the only translator of legal documents produced a wrong reading that the author acted on publicly). Uncorroborated, self-disclosed account by a named author in an edited commentary, with his own published correction; the conviction is recorded as context and not attributed to AI.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-30"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The author says he put every summons, ruling and prosecutor's letter into a consumer chatbot and that two systems gave conflicting readings of an oversight body's letter in 2025 (JURIST). The systems are not named and their outputs were not inspected; his media-brief page documents the resulting correction.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"First-person account (JURIST commentary): a Canadian convicted in Taiwan who read his court documents only through consumer chatbots says two systems gave opposite readings of an oversight body's letter in 2025; he published the favourable reading, cited it to journalists and drafted a legal submission on it before the agency confirmed in writing that it was wrong","summary":"In a commentary published by JURIST on 29 September 2026, Ross Cline, a Canadian who lived in Taichung for 15 years and was convicted there under Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act (six months' imprisonment; final at the Supreme Court on 16 October 2024), writes that across four years of proceedings no document was translated for him, some hearings had no interpreter, and he read every summons, ruling and prosecutor's letter through a consumer chatbot, 'the only version I had'. In 2025 he ran a letter from a Taiwanese oversight body (the Control Yuan, per his media-brief page) through two systems; they disagreed on its central holding. He believed the one that told him what he wanted to hear, published that reading, cited it to journalists and began building a legal submission on it. In October 2025 the agency confirmed in writing that its letter did not say that; he withdrew the claim, killed the submission before filing and rewrote his public materials so that the correction leads. His own media-brief page carries a correction notice withdrawing two earlier statements. He argues that machine translation has become the interpreter of record by default for unrepresented non-citizens, that a fluent wrong translation reads as authoritative, and that courts should enforce the existing right to an interpreter. His conviction itself is not attributed to the chatbot.","incidentDate":"2025-01-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"year","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-09-29","aiSystem":"Consumer AI chatbots used to translate Chinese-language court and agency documents (two unnamed systems)","aiProduct":"Unidentified chatbot","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["impaired_judgment","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"A defendant relying on chatbot translation says a wrong but fluent rendering of an official letter led him to publish a false claim about his case, cite it to journalists and draft a legal submission on it, which he then had to retract and correct publicly (his own account in JURIST and on his media-brief page).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the author, who used the chatbots himself (JURIST). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"TW","platformType":"chatbot","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2026/09/when-court-interpretation-failed-in-taiwan-i-turned-to-a-chatbot/","primarySourceLabel":"JURIST Commentary, 29 September 2026: When Court Interpretation Failed in Taiwan, I Turned to a Chatbot (Ross Cline)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-30T04:13:53.222314+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T04:13:53.222314+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","chatbot","machine-translation","court-interpretation","legal-documents","taiwan","canadian-abroad","access-to-justice","communicated-with"]},{"id":"2025-taylor-lorenz-reports-stalker-making-sora-ai-videos-of-her","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"an invite to Sora and he’s already making AI videos of me","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"was already using OpenAI’s tool to make AI videos of her","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"her “stalker” is using the latest version of Open AI’s Sora to generate videos of her","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"On 2 October 2025 the journalist posted that her stalker had been given an invite to Sora and was already making AI videos of her.","causal_attribution":"The account is the journalist's own public post. Futurism and The Canary relay it. Nobody outside her has inspected the videos or confirmed which account produced them."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"runs hundreds (yes hundreds) of accounts dedicated to me.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"This is a man who has hired photographers to surveil me, shows up at events I am at, impersonates my friends and family members online to gather info","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The journalist says the man runs hundreds of accounts dedicated to her, has hired photographers to surveil her, shows up at events she attends and impersonates her friends and family members online to gather information.","causal_attribution":"These conduct claims are the journalist's own and are not corroborated by any inspected record. They describe the wider stalking that predates the AI use."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Thankful that Sora has the option to block and delete unapproved content with my image.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"allowed Lorenz to block and delete unapproved videos with her image from the app","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"the stalker may have already downloaded the AI creations","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The journalist says Sora offered an option to block and delete unapproved content showing her image, and Futurism reports she was able to block and delete such videos, although the man may already have downloaded them.","causal_attribution":"The block-and-delete account is the journalist's. The possibility of earlier downloads is Futurism's inference and is not established."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"It is scary to think what AI is doing to feed my stalker’s delusions.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"This is a dangerous man","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The journalist wrote that it is scary to think what AI is doing to feed her stalker's delusions and called him a dangerous man.","causal_attribution":"These are the journalist's own characterisations. Her posts do not describe the content of the videos."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"It’s unclear how Lorenz’s stalker was able to allegedly use Sora to deepfake her.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"OpenAI claims that the app blocks users from uploading photos with faces.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Futurism reports that it is unclear how the stalker was able to use Sora to depict the journalist, and that OpenAI says the app blocks uploads of photos with faces.","causal_attribution":"This is Futurism's observation. It marks the mechanism of the alleged use as unresolved."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Open AI launched Sora 2 on 1 October.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"5:50 PM · Oct 2, 2025","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"5:53 PM · Oct 2, 2025","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Barely a day after Sora 2 launched","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"OpenAI launched Sora 2 on 1 October 2025, and the journalist's two posts are dated 2 October 2025.","causal_attribution":"The launch date is The Canary's statement. The post dates are the platform timestamps on the journalist's own posts."}],"effects":[{"label":"A journalist reports that her stalker is making AI videos of her with Sora, which she calls scary and dangerous","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://x.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1973807926948352008","kind":"social_post","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"lorenz-own-posts-2025-10-02"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://x.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1973808606798885209","kind":"social_post","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"","independence_group":"lorenz-own-posts-2025-10-02"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/stalkers-using-openai-sora-2","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Reports the two posts. Futurism did not verify the videos.","independence_group":"lorenz-own-posts-2025-10-02"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2025/10/03/stalkers-are-already-depicting-their-victims-in-open-ais-sora-2-video-generator/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read via an Internet Archive capture. Reports the second post. The Canary did not verify the videos.","independence_group":"lorenz-own-posts-2025-10-02"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["privacy","relationships"],"unknowns":["The content of the AI videos is not described in any inspected source and the reviewer did not see them.","Whether the videos were shared, and with whom, is not reported in the inspected sources.","When the stalking began is not stated. Only the AI use is dated, between the Sora 2 launch and 2 October 2025.","How the stalker made videos of the journalist in Sora is unclear according to Futurism.","No police report, platform enforcement action or OpenAI statement about this case is reported in the inspected sources.","The stalker has not been identified in any inspected source and the man's own account is absent."],"geography":{"basis":"The inspected sources do not state where the stalker or the journalist was located when the videos were made. The archive lists USA, which no inspected source supports as an event location. No court proceeding is reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"The journalist's own posts on X (2 October 2025) are the primary source. Futurism and The Canary relay those posts and are in the same independence group. All claims are reported. The journalist is named because she posted publicly under her own name about this event. The stalker is not named or identified. No imagery is described beyond the kind of content (AI videos). The event month is October 2025, established by the Sora 2 launch and the posts.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-29"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Lorenz states that the stalker is making AI videos of her with Sora and that Sora let her block and delete unapproved content showing her image. Futurism says it is unclear how the stalker used Sora to depict her. The videos were not inspected by the reviewer or, as far as the sources say, by the outlets.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Technology journalist Taylor Lorenz says her stalker is using Sora to make AI videos of her","summary":"On 2 October 2025, shortly after OpenAI's Sora 2 video app launched, journalist Taylor Lorenz posted on X that someone gave her stalker an invite to Sora and that he was already making AI videos of her. She wrote that he runs hundreds of accounts dedicated to her, has hired photographers to surveil her, appears at events she attends and impersonates her friends and family online to gather information. She said Sora let her block and delete unapproved content showing her image. Futurism and The Canary reported her posts. The videos were not inspected, no police or platform action beyond her use of the block-and-delete option is reported, and how the videos were made is unclear.","incidentDate":"2025-10-01","incidentKind":"ongoing_experience","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-10-02","aiSystem":"Sora 2","aiProduct":"Sora","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Lorenz wrote that it is scary to think what AI is doing to feed her stalker's delusions and called the man dangerous. She reports that he already makes AI videos of her, alongside a longer pattern of surveillance and online impersonation. These are her own public statements. Whether the videos were distributed is not reported.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the journalist, reports being targeted. Her friends and family members are described as impersonated online but no harm to them is reported, so they are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","primarySourceUrl":"https://x.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1973807926948352008","primarySourceLabel":"Taylor Lorenz on X, 2 October 2025, post about her stalker and Sora","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T14:02:38.607332+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:17.986169+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2025"]},{"id":"2018-india-journalist-deepfake-sexual-abuse","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Article paragraphs introducing Rana Ayyub and describing her immediate reaction and hospital visit (retained text L63-L64).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The journalist reported a sexual deepfake circulating in April 2018 and a hospital visit for acute distress.","causal_attribution":"Participant account; independent verification of the reported consequence is unavailable."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Paragraph describing her brother travelling from Mumbai to see her in Delhi (web-reader L129).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Her account locates the aftermath in Delhi.","causal_attribution":"Participant account; independent verification of the reported consequence is unavailable."}],"effects":[{"label":"The journalist reported acute distress and nonconsensual sexual depiction.","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.dazeddigital.com/science-tech/article/41424/1/deepfakes-ai-edited-revenge-porn","kind":"journalistic_interview","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English article read directly; relevant paragraphs on Ayyub and her complaint. The source interviews two different women.","independence_group":"ayyub-account"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.huffpost.com/archive/in/entry/deepfake-porn_a_23595592","kind":"first_person_account","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"English contributor account read through the web reader after the direct request returned 406. Same witness, not independent corroboration.","independence_group":"ayyub-account"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["identity","privacy","work"],"unknowns":["The creator and generation software are unknown.","Hospital admission, diagnosis and later clinical course are unverified.","The independent contribution of the video within the surrounding harassment is not established."],"geography":{"basis":"The first-person account places her in Delhi during the aftermath. No court location is asserted.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["IN"],"affected_person_countries":["IN"]},"publication":{"basis":"Concrete adverse experience with a core person relation. Claims remain attributed to their sources. Technical and causal limits are recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-25"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Dazed describes this particular video as a deepfake. No forensic examination was conducted.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Indian journalist reports acute distress and a hospital visit after sexual deepfake abuse","summary":"An Indian journalist later reported acute distress and a hospital visit after a sexual deepfake of her circulated in April 2018. The generation tool and clinical records were not inspected.","incidentDate":"2018-04-01","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2018-09-19","aiSystem":"Unspecified deepfake video tool","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The journalist reported acute distress and nonconsensual sexual depiction.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One targeted journalist. Relatives and viewers are not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"media_coverage","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.dazeddigital.com/science-tech/article/41424/1/deepfakes-ai-edited-revenge-porn","primarySourceLabel":"Dazed, interview, 19 September 2018","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-25T03:28:55.40973+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:16:46.167294+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-review"]},{"id":"2024-south-korea-telegram-deepfake-crisis","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1a","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"BBC 3 Sep 2024 confirms Ko Narin's Hankyoreh scoop and describes the school- and university-specific rooms.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Hankyoreh English's own exposure of the military Telegram room (27 Aug 2024).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Around 26 August 2024 The Hankyoreh (Ko Narin) exposed Telegram rooms creating and sharing AI-generated sexual deepfakes of Korean women and girls, with rooms organized by school and university.","causal_attribution":"The scoop's existence and the rooms' school/university organization are confirmed by the BBC's original reporting and Hankyoreh English's companion investigation; the original Korean article is dead-linked and retained uninspected."},{"id":"c1b","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Room-structure passages: 'humiliation rooms'/'friend of friend rooms', entry terms, the 2,000-member school group.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The rooms ran as 'humiliation rooms' and 'friend of friend rooms' with entry terms demanding at least four photos plus name, age and area, and one group for underage pupils at a single school had more than 2,000 members.","causal_attribution":"Single-chain detail from the BBC's 3 Sep 2024 account; no second inspected chain describes the entry terms or the 2,000-member group."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Police-figure passages: 297 vs 180; 'The victims are often minors and the perpetrators are mostly teenagers'.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"Watchdog ~6,500 requests Jan-Jul (4x); 178 suspects booked, 74% aged 10-19; >half of erased deepfakes involved minors.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"}],"assertion":"Police recorded 297 deepfake cases in January-July 2024 against 180 in all of 2023; the watchdog received nearly 6,500 takedown requests in the first seven months of 2024 (four times the prior year); of 178 suspects booked, 74% were aged 10-19; more than half of erased deepfakes involved minors; victims were often minors and perpetrators mostly teenagers.","causal_attribution":"Both outlets relay the same police and watchdog accounts; traced to one official origin, so the figures are reported rather than corroborated. Figures count cases, requests and suspects, not harmed people."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'more than 900 students, teachers and staff' (education ministry); 'of 964 deepfake-related sex crime cases reported from January to October last year, police made 23 arrests' (Seoul police statement).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"The education ministry counted more than 900 students, teachers and staff victimized between January and early November 2024; a Seoul police statement said that of 964 deepfake-related sex crime cases reported January-October 2024, 23 arrests were made.","causal_attribution":"Single chain (CNN) relaying official figures; the education-ministry count is the record's person-count lower bound."},{"id":"c4","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"Reuters wire via CNN, 26 Sep 2024: possession/viewing criminalized.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"CNN 25 Apr 2025: Sep 2024 law — possession/viewing up to 3 years or 30M won; creation maximum raised 5 to 7 years.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"On 26 September 2024 the National Assembly criminalized possessing or viewing sexually explicit deepfakes (up to 3 years' prison or a 30 million won fine); the maximum sentence for creating deepfake pornography was raised from 5 to 7 years.","causal_attribution":"The statute is a public record carried by two chains (Reuters wire; CNN original). The historical claim of an October 2024 amendment removing the distribution-intent requirement was not re-verified and is recorded as an unknown."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Military IDs turned into deepfake porn': servicewomen called 'military supplies'; at least 30 victims; channel active since 8 Aug with ~850 audience.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"A separate Telegram room degraded servicewomen with deepfakes made from military-intranet ID photos, implying insider involvement, with at least 30 victims across the Army, Navy and Air Force and an audience of about 850 since 8 August 2024.","causal_attribution":"Single chain (Hankyoreh original reporting)."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Heejin passages (pseudonymous victim account).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"Ruma passages (pseudonymous victim account).","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"Individual victims described severe harm: a pseudonymous school victim 'Heejin' spoke to the BBC, and 'Ruma', targeted in 2021 at age 27, spoke to CNN.","causal_attribution":"Pseudonymous first-person accounts carried by two outlets; the historical record's 'broke my whole belief system' quotation was not re-found in inspected sources and is dropped from the claims."},{"id":"c7","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Korea Herald 16 Nov 2025 relaying the National Office of Investigation figures.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"}],"assertion":"By November 2025 the National Office of Investigation reported 3,557 people apprehended for cybersexual violence over the preceding year, with deepfake crimes the largest category (1,553 cases) and about 62% of suspects teenagers.","causal_attribution":"Single chain relaying official figures; apprehension figures count suspects, not victims."}],"effects":[{"label":"mass AI-generated sexual deepfakes of identified women and girls distributed in Telegram rooms","claim_id":"c1a","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpdlpj9zn9go","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (3 Sep 2024; Jean Mackenzie, Seoul). Original reporting: victim 'Heejin', room structure, the 2,000-member school group, the 500+ activist-compiled school list.","independence_group":"bbc"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg4yerrg451o","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (28 Aug 2024). Yoon cabinet order; police figures attributed.","independence_group":"bbc"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/1155588.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (27 Aug 2024). Hankyoreh's own exposure of the military room.","independence_group":"hankyoreh"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.npr.org/2024/09/06/nx-s1-5101891/south-korea-deepfake","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (6 Sep 2024). Watchdog and police figures attributed.","independence_group":"npr"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/26/asia/south-korea-deepfake-bill-passed-intl-hnk","kind":"wire_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (26 Sep 2024); bylined Reuters.","independence_group":"reuters"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/25/asia/south-korea-deepfake-crimes-intl-hnk-dst","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (25 Apr 2025). CNN original: victim 'Ruma', education-ministry figure, Seoul police statement.","independence_group":"cnn"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10616925","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-09-15 (16 Nov 2025; the historical date 2025-11-01 was wrong). National Office of Investigation figures.","independence_group":"korea-herald"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/1155800.html","kind":"news_report","access":"unavailable","language":null,"translation_note":"HTTP 404 on 2026-09-15. Ko Narin's original Korean investigation (~26 Aug 2024); retained as the historical reference. BBC's 3 Sep 2024 report confirms the scoop; the body was not inspected in this review and its language is not re-asserted.","independence_group":"hankyoreh"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["education","justice"],"unknowns":["Not re-verified in inspected sources and therefore not claims of this record: the 220,000-member channel figure; 781 victims with 37% minors; Women's Human Rights Institute of Korea 332,341 supported cases; the October 2024 amendment removing the distribution-intent requirement; the Seoul National University graduates' 9-year and 3.5-year sentences; the teachers' union 200-school estimate; the 'broke my whole belief system' victim quotation.","The specific AI tools used are not identified in the inspected reporting.","Ko Narin's original Korean article (hani.co.kr 1155800) is HTTP 404; its contents are known only through the BBC's confirmation and the historical record.","The ScienceDirect study cited by the historical record answered 403 and was not inspected.","Cross-group overlap between police case counts, the education-ministry victim count and watchdog requests is unresolved."],"geography":{"basis":"Events, victims and the responding institutions are all in South Korea (all chains). No court proceeding is verified in this review, so court_countries is [].","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["KR"],"affected_person_countries":["KR"]},"publication":{"basis":"Restored under the 2026-09-15 charter as a harmful-artifact crisis affecting identified women and girls, predominantly minors. The person count is the education ministry's documented lower bound; case, request and membership figures are recorded but never used as person counts. Unverifiable historical claims are preserved as unknowns rather than deleted silently. No death; the death-verification rule is not engaged. Pseudonymous victims remain pseudonymous. In a 2026-09-15 second pass the original compound first claim was split: the corroborated exposure and room organization stand as c1a, and the BBC-only structure details (entry terms, 2,000-member group) stand as reported c1b. person_relations recorded in the same pass.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-15"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Every inspected chain describes AI deepfake tools as the generation mechanism and Telegram as the distribution channel; police and watchdog figures classify the cases as deepfake sex crimes. The specific tools are not individually identified beyond 'AI deepfake/nudify tools'.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"South Korea Telegram AI Deepfake Sexual Abuse Crisis","summary":"In late August 2024, journalist Ko Narin of The Hankyoreh exposed networks of Telegram rooms in South Korea where AI tools were used to turn ordinary photos of women and girls — middle and high school pupils, university students, teachers and servicewomen — into sexual deepfakes, shared with their identities in school- and university-specific 'humiliation rooms'. Police figures showed 297 deepfake cases in January-July 2024 (vs 180 in all of 2023); the education ministry counted more than 900 victimized students, teachers and staff; President Yoon ordered a crackdown; and on 26 September 2024 the National Assembly criminalized possessing or viewing sexually explicit deepfakes. Victims were often minors and perpetrators mostly teenagers.","incidentDate":"2024-08-01","incidentEndDate":"2024-09-26","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2024-08-26","aiSystem":"AI deepfake generation tools (various)","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","aiCompany":"Multiple (various free AI 'undressing' tools)","severity":"critical","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":["minor_exploitation","third_party_harm_facilitation","psychological_manipulation"],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Mass non-consensual AI sexual imagery of schoolgirls, students, teachers and servicewomen, distributed with their identities in Telegram rooms; pseudonymous victims describe severe distress, and police recorded hundreds of cases dominated by minor victims and teenage perpetrators.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":900,"affectedCountStatus":"documented_minimum","affectedCountEvidence":"Lower bound: the South Korean education ministry's count of 'more than 900 students, teachers and staff' victimized (January-early November 2024), carried by CNN's 25 April 2025 report. This counts people reported as victims to the education authorities. Police figures (297 cases; 964 cases) count cases, not people, and are not used as person counts; the watchdog's ~6,500 figures count takedown requests, not people; the 500+ schools figure is an activist-compiled list of targets, not a victim count; channel membership numbers are not counted. Cross-group overlap is unresolved.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"KR","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpdlpj9zn9go","primarySourceLabel":"BBC News, Jean Mackenzie (3 Sep 2024) — 'Inside the deepfake porn crisis engulfing Korean schools' (replaces the dead Hankyoreh original)","firstPublishedAt":"2026-01-29T09:52:18.956616+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:16:53.809496+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfakes","minor","south-korea","telegram","sexual-images","school","criminal-charges","legislation","mass-scale","non-western"]}]}