{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-11-07T02:11:23.573Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"generative-ai","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"","evidence":"","year":"2025","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":6,"coverage":{"cases":6,"countries":4,"languages":4,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":0,"lawsuits":1,"regulatory":1,"minors":1,"coreRelations":4,"contextualRelations":1,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":1,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":1},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2025-seoul-court-fines-district-office-official-for-posting-generative-ai-fake-couple-photos-of-female-colleague","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'구청 조직도에서 내려받은 같은 과 B씨의 사진을 생성형 AI를 활용해 자신과 연인 사이인 것처럼 합성한 뒤 네 차례에 걸쳐 자신의 SNS 프로필에 게시한 혐의를 받는다'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'AI로 이를 합성해 마치 연인 관계인 것처럼 꾸며 자신의 SNS 프로필에 게시한 것으로 조사됐다'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'동료 여직원의 얼굴을 인공지능(AI)으로 합성해 마치 연인 사이인 것처럼 가짜 사진을 만들어 자신의 소셜미디어(SNS)에 올린'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Under the charges, in November 2025 he took a photo of a female colleague in the same department from the office's organisation chart, used generative AI to composite it into pictures making them look like a couple, and posted them four times on his social media profile.","causal_attribution":"The charges as reported by Yonhap and Newslaw; Kyeonggi Ilbo also says the faces were composited with AI and names a photo-editing app (claim c5)."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'총 600만원(성폭력처벌법 위반 500만원·명예훼손 100만원)의 벌금을 선고했다'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'공소사실 전부를 유죄로 인정했다'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 11 September 2026 the Seoul Southern District Court convicted him on all counts and fined him 6 million won in total (5 million won under the Sexual Violence Punishment Act and 1 million won for defamation).","causal_attribution":"Court outcome as reported; the judgment was not inspected."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'피해자는 피고인이 올린 허위 영상물을 보고 수치심, 모욕감, 혐오감이 한 번에 몰려왔다고 진술하고 있다'; '사건 이후 사내에 소문이 퍼져 수치심과 두려움이 크다고 말하는 상황'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The judge cited the colleague's statement that she felt shame, insult and disgust on seeing the images and that rumours had spread at work, leaving her ashamed and afraid.","causal_attribution":"The judge's account of the victim's statement."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'초기 수사 단계에서는 '혐의없음' 처분을 받으며 논란이 됐다'; '지난 17일 법원에 항소장을 냈고, 검찰 역시 양형이 가볍다고 보고 항소한 것으로 알려졌다'; '해임 처분을 의결했다'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Police initially found no offence; afterwards he and the prosecution both appealed and the Seoul city personnel committee voted to dismiss him.","causal_attribution":"Newslaw report; the dismissal decision itself was not inspected."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'사진 편집 애플리케이션(앱)을 이용해'; '동료 여직원의 얼굴을 인공지능(AI)으로 합성해'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"Kyeonggi Ilbo, which also says the compositing was done with AI, says he made the pictures with a photo-editing app.","causal_attribution":"Detail on the tool; the same report says the compositing was done with AI, so it does not contradict the charges reported by Yonhap. No product is named."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'명예훼손 혐의와 허위 영상물 제작·게시 사실은 인정하면서도'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'자신이 게시한 영상물이 피해자의 성적 수치심을 유발하기 어렵고 그럴 고의도 없었다고 주장했지만'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"In court he admitted the defamation and making and posting the false images, but denied that they could cause sexual shame or that he intended that.","causal_attribution":"The defendant's position in court as reported by Kyeonggi Ilbo and Yonhap."}],"effects":[{"label":"colleague felt shame, insult and disgust and faced workplace rumours after AI-composited fake couple photos were posted, per the court","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20260911101300004","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ko","translation_note":"Read in the original Korean on 2026-10-22 (HTTP 200). English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. Report of the 11 September 2026 ruling and the charges.","independence_group":"seoul-southern-district-court-ruling-reporting"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.kyeonggi.com/article/20260911580223","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ko","translation_note":"Read in the original Korean on 2026-10-22 (HTTP 200). English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. Separate report of the same hearing; it describes the tool as a photo-editing app.","independence_group":"seoul-southern-district-court-ruling-reporting"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.newslaw.co.kr/ko-kr/articles/2255","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ko","translation_note":"Read in the original Korean on 2026-10-22 (HTTP 200). English renderings in this record are the research agent's (an AI's) own translations; no human translator reviewed them. Later report on the dismissal, the appeals and the initial police decision.","independence_group":"newslaw-dismissal-and-appeal-report"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["work","relationships","justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool or app was used; the reports name generative AI and a photo-editing app but no product.","The outcome of the appeals and of any challenge to the dismissal.","How widely the photos were seen."],"geography":{"basis":"The photo came from a Seoul district office's organisation chart, the colleague works at that office, and the Seoul Southern District Court decided the case.","court_countries":["KR"],"event_countries":["KR"],"affected_person_countries":["KR"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): a Seoul court convicted and fined an official whose charges say he used generative AI to make fake couple photos of a colleague and posted them, and cited her shame and workplace rumours. Two reporting chains (ruling reports; Newslaw on the dismissal); one report also describes the tool as a photo-editing app.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-22"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The charges, as reported by Yonhap and Newslaw, state that he used generative AI to composite the colleague's photo into fake couple pictures, and the court convicted him on all counts. The pictures depicted the colleague (depicted_or_impersonated) and the judge cited her shame and the rumours that followed. Kyeonggi Ilbo also says he composited the photos with AI and describes the tool as a photo-editing app; he admitted in court making and posting the false images. The technical basis of the AI description is not disclosed.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Seoul court fines a district office official 6 million won for posting generative-AI fake couple photos of a female colleague on his social media profile","summary":"The Seoul Southern District Court on 11 September 2026 fined a male official in his fifties at a Seoul district office a total of 6 million won for making and posting false images and for defamation, according to Korean reports of the ruling. Under the charges, in November 2025 he took a photo of a female colleague in his department from the office's organisation chart, used generative AI to composite it into pictures that made them look like a couple, and posted them four times on his social media profile. The judge cited the colleague's statement that she felt shame, insult and disgust, and that rumours had spread at work. Police had initially found no offence before the case was sent back to prosecutors. Both he and the prosecution appealed, and the Seoul city personnel committee voted to dismiss him.","incidentDate":"2025-11-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-09-11","aiSystem":"Generative AI, not named in the reports, used to composite a colleague's photo into fake couple pictures (one report also describes the tool as a photo-editing app)","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["psychological_distress","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the court as reported, a colleague whose photo was composited with generative AI into fake couple pictures posted on an official's social media felt shame, insult and disgust, and rumours spread at work; the official was fined and dismissed.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"established","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person, the colleague depicted in the photos (court ruling as reported). Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"KR","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20260911101300004","primarySourceLabel":"Yonhap News Agency, 11 September 2026: district official who composited a colleague's face with AI fined","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-22T03:23:44.455411+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-22T03:23:44.455411+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["ai-composite","workplace","false-images","criminal-fine","south-korea","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2025-colorado-federal-court-fines-mypillow-defence-lawyers-over-brief-with-fabricated-citations-after-ai-admission","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Defendants filed their Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff'; 'the Court identified nearly thirty defective citations in the Opposition'; 'and most egregiously, citation of cases that do not exist'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'and most egregiously, citation of cases that do not exist'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The defendants' opposition to the plaintiff's motion in limine, filed on 25 February 2025 and signed by Kachouroff and DeMaster, contained nearly thirty defective citations, including misquotes and citations of cases that do not exist.","causal_attribution":"Established by the court orders, which record the court's own review of the filed brief."},{"id":"c2","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'Was this motion generated by generative'; 'Initially, I did an outline for myself, and I'; 'drafted a motion, and then we ran it through AI'; 'I personally did not check it'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference held on April 21, 2025'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"At the final pretrial conference on 21 April 2025, asked whether the motion was generated by generative artificial intelligence, Kachouroff said he had drafted it and then ran it through AI, and that he personally did not check the citations.","causal_attribution":"Counsel's statement to the court, quoted from the transcript in the 7 July order; it establishes what counsel said, and the AI's role in the defective citations rests on that statement and the co-counsel declaration."},{"id":"c3","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'believed some of these citations were likely from AI drafts'; 'I do not rely on AI to do legal research or find cases'; 'the use of generative artificial intelligence or gross carelessness by counsel'; 'Nor is this Court persuaded by counsel'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"Co-counsel's declaration said Kachouroff had told her he believed some of the citations were likely from AI drafts; counsel also said a wrong draft had been filed by mistake and Kachouroff declared he does not rely on AI to do legal research or find cases. The court was not persuaded by the wrong-draft explanation and found no explanation of how the citations appeared absent generative AI or gross carelessness.","causal_attribution":"The declarations' content and the court's findings are documented by the order; the order does not itself find which tool produced the citations."},{"id":"c4","status":"documented","evidence":[{"locator":"'The Court hereby SANCTIONS Christopher I. Kachouroff and the law firm'; 'The Court hereby SANCTIONS Jennifer T. DeMaster in the amount of'; 'this Court does not extend the sanctions to Defendants'; 'no later than August 4, 2025'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'A federal judge ordered two attorneys representing MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell in a Colorado defamation case to pay $3,000 each'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"On 7 July 2025 the court held that Kachouroff and DeMaster violated Rule 11 and sanctioned Kachouroff and his law firm jointly $3,000 and DeMaster $3,000, payable by 4 August 2025, and did not extend the sanctions to Lindell or his companies.","causal_attribution":"Established by the operative part of the 7 July order; NPR relays it."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Kachouroff and DeMaster didn'; 'request for comment'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"NPR reported that Kachouroff and DeMaster did not respond to its request for comment.","causal_attribution":"NPR's own report of its request."}],"effects":[{"label":"two defence lawyers were fined $3,000 each for a brief with fabricated citations that lead counsel said had been run through AI","claim_id":"c4","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cod-1_22-cv-01129/pdf/USCOURTS-cod-1_22-cv-01129-10.pdf","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-14 (HTTP 200). Order of 7 July 2025 (Doc. 383, 20 pages) read in full; the hearing transcript, the declarations and the draft exhibits it cites were not read separately.","independence_group":"coomer-v-lindell-d-colo-sanctions-orders"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cod-1_22-cv-01129/pdf/USCOURTS-cod-1_22-cv-01129-8.pdf","kind":"court_record","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-14 (HTTP 200). Order to show cause of 23 April 2025 (Doc. 309) read in full.","independence_group":"coomer-v-lindell-d-colo-sanctions-orders"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.npr.org/2025/07/10/nx-s1-5463512/ai-courts-lawyers-mypillow-fines","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in full in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-14 (HTTP 200). NPR reports the 7 July order and quotes it; it adds that the lawyers did not respond to a request for comment.","independence_group":"coomer-v-lindell-d-colo-sanctions-orders"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use","others_use"],"contexts":["justice","work"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool was used on the brief and which citations it introduced.","Whether either lawyer has faced bar disciplinary proceedings over the brief; the final order imposes fines only."],"geography":{"basis":"The brief was filed in, and the sanctions imposed by, the US District Court for the District of Colorado (both orders). Where the lawyers drafted the brief is not stated, so no event or affected-person country is recorded from the court seat.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published because the court's 7 July 2025 order documents that two defence lawyers were fined $3,000 each for a brief with nearly thirty defective citations, including non-existent cases, and quotes lead counsel's statement in court that the draft was run through AI and not checked.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-14"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The court's 7 July 2025 order quotes lead counsel's answer at the 21 April 2025 conference that after drafting the motion 'we ran it through AI' and that he did not check the citations, and quotes co-counsel's declaration that he believed some of the citations were likely from AI drafts. The filed brief contained citations of cases that do not exist, and the court found counsel gave no explanation of how those citations appeared absent the use of generative artificial intelligence or gross carelessness; it fined both lawyers for the brief. The AI output is thus connected to the sanctioned filing by counsel's own statements in the court record. Counsel later declared that he does not rely on AI to do legal research or find cases, and the court did not identify the tool.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["communicated_with"]},"name":"Colorado federal court fines two MyPillow defence lawyers $3,000 each over a brief with fabricated citations; lead counsel had admitted running it through AI","summary":"In the defamation case Coomer v. Lindell in the US District Court for the District of Colorado, a brief that lawyers for Mike Lindell and MyPillow filed on 25 February 2025 contained nearly thirty defective citations, including citations of cases that do not exist. At a conference on 21 April 2025 lead counsel Christopher Kachouroff told Judge Nina Y. Wang that he had drafted the motion and then 'ran it through AI' and had not personally checked the citations. Counsel later said a wrong draft had been filed by mistake; the court was not persuaded. On 7 July 2025 the court found that he and co-counsel Jennifer DeMaster had violated Rule 11 and fined each $3,000 (Kachouroff jointly with his law firm). The court did not sanction Lindell or his companies.","incidentDate":"2025-02-25","incidentEndDate":"2025-07-07","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-04-23","aiSystem":"A generative AI tool that lead counsel said the draft brief was run through; the court record does not identify which tool was used for this brief","aiProduct":"Unidentified AI drafting tool","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","financial_loss","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"According to the court's 7 July 2025 order, two defence lawyers were found to have violated Rule 11 and were each fined $3,000 after filing a brief with nearly thirty defective citations, including non-existent cases, which lead counsel had said was run through AI.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Two people sanctioned in the 7 July 2025 order: lead counsel, who told the court the draft was run through AI (counted as the AI user), and co-counsel who signed the brief, whose own use of AI is not established (counted as another person harmed). The law firm is an organisation and is not counted; the defendants were not sanctioned.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"assistant","outcomeType":"regulatory_action","outcomeStatus":"resolved","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cod-1_22-cv-01129/pdf/USCOURTS-cod-1_22-cv-01129-10.pdf","primarySourceLabel":"US District Court for the District of Colorado, Coomer v. Lindell, order on the order to show cause (Doc. 383), 7 July 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-14T03:03:29.9489+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-14T03:03:29.9489+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["colorado","federal-court","defamation-case","lawyers","fabricated-citations","rule-11-sanction","generative-ai"]},{"id":"2025-puerto-rico-federal-court-sanctions-soccer-league-lawyers-over-citations-judge-said-bore-ai-hallmarks","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"The judge ordered attorneys José Olmo-Rodríguez and Ibrahim Reyes Gándara to pay $24,492.10 on September 23, 2025, after finding dozens of inaccurate or nonexistent legal citations across four filings.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"A subsequent order issued on September 23, 2025, established the financial penalty at $24,492.10, payable to FIFA and other defendants.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The judge found dozens of inaccurate or nonexistent legal citations across four filings by the league's attorneys and ordered the two attorneys to pay $24,492.10 on 23 September 2025.","causal_attribution":"The court record as reported; the order itself was not read."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Arias-Marxuach said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI, although both lawyers denied using the technology. He found that they violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by failing to reasonably verify the legal authorities supporting their arguments.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"previously concluded that filings by the plaintiffs’ lawyers contained 55 erroneous citations that appeared to have been generated with artificial intelligence, according to Reuters.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The judge said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI and found a Rule 11 violation for failing to reasonably verify the cited authorities.","causal_attribution":"The AI attribution is the judge's assessment; the sanction rests on the failure to verify."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"although both lawyers denied using the technology","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"However, attorneys José Olmo-Rodríguez and Ibrahim Reyes Gándara have denied using artificial intelligence to prepare the problematic submissions.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Both lawyers have denied using artificial intelligence to prepare the filings.","causal_attribution":"Counterevidence to the AI attribution."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In April 2025, Judge Arias-Marxuach determined that deficiencies in the lawyers' submissions warranted sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and the court's inherent authority to address litigation misconduct.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The judge decided in April 2025 that the deficiencies warranted sanctions under Rule 11 and the court's inherent authority.","causal_attribution":"Procedural history of the sanction as reported; no causal claim about AI."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"In an October 6, 2026, filing, soccer's international governing body urged Chief U.S. District Judge Raúl Arias-Marxuach to dismiss the Puerto Rico Soccer League's remaining antitrust claim; The attorneys subsequently proposed paying $1,000 per month beginning October 15","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"The plaintiffs' lawyers oppose that request, maintaining that dismissal would unfairly penalise their client for the conduct of its legal representatives.","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"FIFA asked the court in an October 2026 filing to dismiss the league's remaining antitrust claim because the sanction had not been paid; the lawyers proposed paying $1,000 a month and argued that dismissal would punish their client.","causal_attribution":"The dismissal request responds to the unpaid sanction; its outcome is pending."}],"effects":[{"label":"two attorneys personally sanctioned $24,492.10 over defective citations","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"},{"label":"the client's remaining claim faces a dismissal request over the unpaid sanction","claim_id":"c5","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.lawcommentary.com/articles/fifa-antitrust-lawsuit-ai-citations-sanctions","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English in full; no translation.","independence_group":"lawcommentary-court-record-oct-2026"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.pymnts.com/cpi-posts/fifa-seeks-to-toss-antitrust-case-over-ai-related-court-sanctions/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English in full; no translation. PYMNTS attributes its account to Reuters reporting; Reuters itself returned HTTP 401 and was not read.","independence_group":"reuters-fifa-oct-2026-relay"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.lawyer-monthly.com/2026/10/fifa-seeks-dismissal-of-antitrust-lawsuit-over-alleged-ai-misuse/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English in full; no translation. Its account closely follows the Reuters report relayed by PYMNTS and is grouped with that relay.","independence_group":"reuters-fifa-oct-2026-relay"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["unknown"],"contexts":["work","justice"],"unknowns":["Whether any AI tool was used to prepare the filings, and which one.","The text of the April 2025 and September 2025 sanction orders, which were not read.","Whether the court will dismiss the league's remaining claim or accept the instalment plan."],"geography":{"basis":"The filings were made in, and the sanction imposed by, the U.S. District Court before Chief U.S. District Judge Arias-Marxuach in Puerto Rico (Law Commentary: 'a federal judge in Puerto Rico'). The event is recorded under Puerto Rico's ISO code PR, and the court, a U.S. federal district court, under US. The attorneys' residence is not stated.","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["PR"],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a concrete court sanction on two attorneys for defective citations that the judge said bore hallmarks of generative AI, with the lawyers' denial recorded. The AI involvement is the judge's assessment and is disputed.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-13"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The harm is a court's sanction responding to defective citations that the court attributed to suspected generative AI use. Law Commentary reports that the judge said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI, and PYMNTS, citing Reuters, reports his conclusion that the 55 erroneous citations appeared to have been generated with AI. Both lawyers deny using AI, no source names a tool, and the sanction itself rests on the failure to verify the citations. Because no AI output is established as reaching the lawyers or the court, the relation is unknown under the consequential-response exemption.","status":"suspected"},"person_relations":["unknown"]},"name":"Puerto Rico federal judge sanctions a soccer league's lawyers over 55 defective citations he said bore hallmarks of generative AI; the lawyers deny using AI","summary":"In an antitrust lawsuit that the Puerto Rico Soccer League brought against FIFA, CONCACAF and Puerto Rican football officials, Chief U.S. District Judge Raúl Arias-Marxuach found dozens of inaccurate or nonexistent legal citations across four filings by the league's two attorneys. According to Law Commentary, he said the errors bore hallmarks of generative AI and found that the lawyers violated Rule 11 by failing to reasonably verify the authorities they cited. Lawyer Monthly reports that the sanctions were decided in April 2025 and that an order of 23 September 2025 set the penalty at $24,492.10, payable to FIFA and the other defendants. Both lawyers have denied using artificial intelligence. In an October 2026 filing FIFA asked the court to dismiss the league's remaining claim because the sanction had not been paid. The lawyers proposed paying $1,000 a month, cited financial difficulties and an injury one of them suffered in March 2026, and argued that dismissal would punish their client for penalties imposed on them personally. The court had not ruled on the dismissal request when these reports were published.","incidentDate":"2025-04-01","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"month","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-10-07","aiSystem":"Generative AI that the judge said the defective citations bore hallmarks of; the lawyers deny using AI and no source names a tool","aiProduct":"Unidentified legal research tool (suspected)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["professional_harm","financial_loss","legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Two attorneys were personally ordered to pay $24,492.10 over defective citations the judge said bore hallmarks of generative AI, and their client's remaining claim now faces a dismissal request over the unpaid sum (court record as reported by Law Commentary and Lawyer Monthly)","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"disputed","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"Two attorneys were ordered to pay the sanction (Law Commentary and Lawyer Monthly name both). They are counted as other people harmed because both deny using AI, so neither is established as a direct AI user. The league is an organisation and is not counted.","victimAgeRange":"adult","jurisdiction":"US","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"lawsuit_ongoing","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.lawcommentary.com/articles/fifa-antitrust-lawsuit-ai-citations-sanctions","primarySourceLabel":"Law Commentary, 12 October 2026: FIFA wants antitrust lawsuit dismissed after lawyers sanctioned over suspected AI-generated citations","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-13T03:08:38.415526+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-13T03:08:38.415526+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["legal-citations","court-sanction","rule-11","generative-ai-suspected","consequential-response","puerto-rico"]},{"id":"2025-ar-esquel-criminal-judgment-annulled-judge-generative-ai-draft","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"decidió el miércoles anular de oficio una sentencia dictada el 4 de junio pasado","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"anular de oficio una sentencia porque el juez la delegó en un ChatGPT","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"La sentencia anulada había condenado al imputado a dos años y seis meses de prisión efectiva por robo simple","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"On 4 June 2025 a criminal judge in Esquel convicted a defendant of simple robbery and sentenced the defendant to two years and six months of effective imprisonment, and the Penal Chamber of Esquel later annulled that judgment.","causal_attribution":"Sources give the annulment as the chamber's response to the judge's AI use."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"Aquí tienes el punto IV reeditado, sin citas y listo para copiar y pegar","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"el magistrado utilizó la IA generativa, ni más ni menos, que en un aspecto central de la resolución en crisis como es la resolución de las nulidades de dos pruebas esenciales en el proceso","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"el juez de primera instancia incluyó accidentalmente una frase que revela el uso de un asistente de Inteligencia Artificial (IA) generativa","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The judgment contained the phrase “Aquí tienes el punto IV reeditado, sin citas y listo para copiar y pegar”, which the chamber took to show generative-AI use, including on the rulings on the nullity of two essential pieces of evidence.","causal_attribution":"The chamber's finding, as quoted in the press, connects the phrase to AI use. The full ruling text was not read."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"anular tanto la sentencia como el juicio que la precedió","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"declaración de nulidad de la sentencia y del juicio que la precede, con todo lo que ello significa para los justiciables","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"ordenando que el proceso se realice nuevamente con la intervención de otro magistrado","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"el tribunal ordenó reenviar el caso a otro juez penal, prohibiendo al Ministerio Público Fiscal exhibir en el nuevo juicio los videos omitidos en el anterior","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"A raíz de esto deberá realizarse nuevamente el juicio, con otro juez","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The chamber annulled the judgment and the preceding trial and ordered a new trial before another judge, and barred the prosecution from showing at the new trial the videos omitted at the first.","causal_attribution":"The annulment is attributed by the chamber to the judge's undisclosed and unsupervised AI use, which the chamber said prevented control of the judge's reasoning."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"remitir las actuaciones al Superior Tribunal de Justicia de Chubut (STJ), que deberá investigar el alcance ético y disciplinario de la conducta","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"pudo haber incumplido los recaudos de confidencialidad exigidos por el Acuerdo Plenario N° 5435 del STJ, al incluir nombres de las partes, testigos y peritos en el texto procesado por el asistente","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The chamber referred the matter to the Chubut Superior Court of Justice to investigate the judge's conduct and said the judge may have breached that court's confidentiality rules by including the names of parties, witnesses and experts in the text processed by the assistant.","causal_attribution":"The confidentiality point is the chamber's stated possibility and was not established as fact."},{"id":"c5","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"presumiblemente ChatGPT","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"el juez la delegó en un ChatGPT","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"Press coverage identifies the assistant as ChatGPT (La Nación as presumed, Perfil without qualification).","causal_attribution":"The ruling as quoted refers to a generative-AI assistant. The product name comes from the press."},{"id":"c6","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'El Superior Tribunal de Justicia de Chubut revocó la nulidad que había dictado la Cámara en lo Penal de Esquel y sostuvo que el uso de herramientas tecnológicas por parte de un juez no invalida automáticamente una sentencia si no se demuestra un perjuicio concreto para las partes.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'Al resolver una queja presentada por las fiscales del caso, el máximo tribunal provincial revocó la nulidad'; 'El fallo del Superior, firmado el 13 de marzo por cinco de sus seis ministros'; 'con una integración distinta a la que había dictado la nulidad'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'Las fiscales del caso recurrieron la nulidad. Al serles denegado el recurso por la propia Cámara, presentaron queja directamente ante el Superior Tribunal de Justicia.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"}],"assertion":"On 13 March 2026 the Chubut Superior Court of Justice, on a complaint appeal by the case's prosecutors, revoked the annulment, holding that a judge's use of support tools does not by itself invalidate a judgment unless a concrete prejudice to the parties is shown, and returned the case to a differently composed Esquel chamber to hear the defence's appeal.","causal_attribution":"Three outlets report one Superior Court ruling; the ruling text was not read; reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"Conviction and trial annulled and retrial ordered (October 2025); the chamber cited serious consequences for the parties; the annulment was revoked in March 2026","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.lanacion.com.ar/sociedad/el-juez-de-esquel-que-uso-chat-para-redactar-una-sentencia-sera-investigado-nid17102025/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Full body read in the original Spanish (17 October 2025) by the reviewing agent without a human translator. Reports the appellate ruling; whether the journalist saw the ruling text is not stated.","independence_group":"esquel-camara-ruling"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://documento.errepar.com/actualidad/justicia-anulada-se-invalida-un-fallo-por-el-uso-indebido-de-la-ia-20251016143159365","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Article body is embedded in the page data and was decoded into bodies/gh-4-body.txt (16 October 2025). Read in Spanish without a human translator. It quotes the ruling. The linked full text of the ruling (documento.errepar.com/jurisprudencia/...) is gated and was not read.","independence_group":"esquel-camara-ruling"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.perfil.com/noticias/nea/inteligencia-artificial-anulan-sentencia-porque-un-juez-uso-un-chatgpt-y-una-frase-lo-delato.phtml","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Full body read in Spanish (17 October 2025) without a human translator. It relays a statement of the Ministerio Publico Fiscal of Chubut and quotes the ruling.","independence_group":"esquel-camara-ruling"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://revistaquorum.com.ar/2026/03/13/ia-en-la-justicia-el-superior-tribunal-de-chubut-revoco-la-nulidad-del-fallo-que-contenia-un-mensaje-de-chatgpt/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish on 2026-10-24 from the publisher page (HTTP 200); translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed it. Reports the Superior Court ruling of 13 March 2026; the ruling text itself was not read.","independence_group":"chubut-stj-queja-ruling-2026-03-13"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.clarin.com/tecnologia/validan-fallo-juez-chubut-quedo-expuesto-usar-ia-punto-iv-reeditado-citas-listo-copiar-pegar_0_tAjosqc33Q.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish on 2026-10-24 from the publisher page (HTTP 200); translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed it. Reports the same Superior Court ruling and gives its signing date.","independence_group":"chubut-stj-queja-ruling-2026-03-13"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.diariojudicial.com/news-102981-la-sentencia-es-del-juez-no-de-la-ia","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"es","translation_note":"Read in Spanish on 2026-10-24 from the publisher page (HTTP 200); translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator reviewed it. Legal-news report quoting the Superior Court ruling; the ruling text itself was not read.","independence_group":"chubut-stj-queja-ruling-2026-03-13"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["institutional_use"],"contexts":["justice"],"unknowns":["The full text of the ruling was not read (the Errepar copy is gated), so all findings are as reported by three outlets that share the same underlying ruling.","The share of the judgment written by the assistant is unknown. The chamber said the pasted text leaves a gap too wide to tell.","The specific AI product is not established. No chat log was seen.","The annulment date of 15 October 2025 is derived from La Nación's 'el miércoles' (article of 17 October 2025) and the metadata of a gated Errepar ruling page; no cited article states the date.","The defendant's own view of the annulment and any effect of the delay on the defendant or on other parties to the case is not reported.","The result of the renewed appeal before the differently composed Esquel chamber and of any disciplinary review of the judge is not reported.","The Superior Court ruling of 13 March 2026 was not read; its content is as reported by Revista Quórum, Clarín and Diario Judicial."],"geography":{"basis":"The court is the Penal Chamber of Esquel in Chubut province, and La Nación calls the ground for the annulment unprecedented in Argentine justice. The defendant's residence and where the judge used the assistant are not stated.","court_countries":["AR"],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Three Spanish-language outlets report the appellate ruling that annulled a criminal judgment and trial after a pasted assistant phrase exposed undisclosed generative-AI use; three further outlets report that the Chubut Superior Court revoked that annulment in March 2026. Each ruling is carried by one reporting chain, so claims are attributed. The effect on the defendant is not reported.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-24"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The appellate chamber, as quoted by three outlets, found a pasted chat phrase in the ruling and concluded that a generative-AI assistant was used. The chamber described delegation of the decision as probable. The assistant's text was pasted into the judgment the judge signed, so its output informed the judge's decision about the defendant (informed_decision_about); in March 2026 the Chubut Superior Court held, as reported, that the pasted phrase did not by itself prove the judge had delegated the decision. The product name ChatGPT is stated by one outlet as presumed and by another without qualification.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["informed_decision_about"]},"name":"Argentina: appeal chamber annulled a robbery judgment after the judge left a generative-AI chat phrase in it; Chubut's high court revoked the annulment","summary":"On 4 June 2025 a criminal judge in Esquel, Chubut province, convicted a defendant of simple robbery and imposed two years and six months of effective imprisonment. On 15 October 2025 the Penal Chamber of Esquel annulled the judgment and the trial, ordering a new trial before another judge. The chamber found that the ruling contained a pasted phrase from a generative-AI assistant (“Aquí tienes el punto IV reeditado, sin citas y listo para copiar y pegar”), that the AI had been used on the rulings on the nullity of two essential pieces of evidence, and that the judge had not exercised human supervision or recorded the use. Perfil's headline describes the assistant as ChatGPT and La Nación's text as presumably ChatGPT; the quoted ruling and the prosecution office statement refer only to a generative-AI assistant. The chamber referred the judge's conduct to the Chubut Superior Court of Justice for ethical and disciplinary review. On 13 March 2026 the Chubut Superior Court of Justice, ruling on a complaint appeal by the case's prosecutors, revoked the annulment, holding that a judge's use of support tools, technological or not, does not by itself invalidate a judgment without a concrete prejudice to the parties, and returned the case to the Esquel chamber, with a different composition, to hear the defence's appeal against the conviction (Revista Quórum, Clarín, Diario Judicial).","incidentDate":"2025-06-04","incidentEndDate":"2025-10-15","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2025-10-16","aiSystem":"Generative AI assistant (reported as ChatGPT)","aiProduct":"ChatGPT (reported)","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["legal_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Per press reports, the appellate chamber annulled the trial and conviction because of the judge's undisclosed generative-AI use and ordered a retrial; the chamber described serious consequences for the parties, the public and the State. Five months later the Chubut Superior Court revoked the annulment, so the conviction's appeal must be heard again. The effect on the defendant is not reported.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"The chamber refers to serious consequences of the annulment for 'los justiciables' (the parties to the proceeding), the public and the State without a count. No inspected source reports harm to the defendant specifically, and annulment of a conviction may be favourable to the defendant.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","platformType":"assistant","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.lanacion.com.ar/sociedad/el-juez-de-esquel-que-uso-chat-para-redactar-una-sentencia-sera-investigado-nid17102025/","primarySourceLabel":"La Nación, 'El juez de Esquel que usó Chat para redactar una sentencia será investigado', 17 October 2025","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-29T12:42:03.091102+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-24T03:15:18.06718+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["historical-2025","annulment-revoked"]},{"id":"2026-hampton-new-hampshire-ai-deepfake-arrest-video-harassment-charges","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'allegedly harassed a Hampton resident for more than a year through phone calls, texts, emails and online posts'; 'with a stalking order of protection last October.'; 'In November, the victim showed police an AI-generated deepfake video'; 'allegedly created to humiliate and defame him, the affidavit states. The video depicts the victim being arrested and jailed and includes a structure resembling the victim's Hampton residence, as well as images of real people.'; 'Keyser said the events shown in the deepfake \"never happened.\"'; 'posted it on YouTube,'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"According to Hampton police and the arrest-warrant affidavit, the accused harassed a Hampton resident for more than a year through phone calls, texts, emails and online posts, continued after being served with a stalking order of protection in October 2025, and created an AI-generated deepfake video, shown to police by the victim in November 2025, that depicts the victim being arrested and jailed and includes a structure resembling his Hampton residence; police say the depicted events never happened and that the video was posted on YouTube.","causal_attribution":"Police and affidavit account (one chain); the accused's lawyer did not respond and the allegations have not been tried."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'on four felony counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes. He was accused of creating, distributing, and presenting a video of an identifiable person to embarrass, harass, or defame them on Oct. 20, Oct. 31, Nov. 7, and Nov. 13, 2025, in Hampton.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Each of the four Class B felony counts carries a maximum penalty of up to seven years in state prison'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"A Rockingham County grand jury indicted the accused on four felony counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes for creating, distributing and presenting a video of an identifiable person to embarrass, harass or defame on 20 October, 31 October, 7 November and 13 November 2025 in Hampton.","causal_attribution":"Indictment as listed by Patch; Seacoastonline independently reports four Class B felony counts. The indictment text was not read."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'He was taken into custody on March 24, arraigned the next day, and released on bail.'; 'He was arrested again on Aug. 26, Keyser said. His bail was revoked'; 'Keyser said police were able to have the deepfake video'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The accused was taken into custody on 24 March, arraigned the next day and released on bail; after alleged bail violations he was arrested again on 26 August, his bail was revoked and he is held at the Rockingham County House of Corrections; police had the deepfake video removed.","causal_attribution":"Police account as reported. The article gives no year for 24 March and 26 August; its publication on 24 September 2026 and the June 2026 indictment place both in 2026."}],"effects":[{"label":"harassed for more than a year and targeted with a posted AI-generated video falsely showing him being arrested and jailed, which police say was made to humiliate and defame him","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.seacoastonline.com/story/news/local/2026/09/24/hampton-police-man-charged-ai-deepfake-harassment-campaign/91897502007/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read on 2026-09-27 in full through the identical Gannett path on eu.seacoastonline.com (www returned 402). Quotes the police sergeant and the arrest-warrant affidavit.","independence_group":"hampton-police-affidavit"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://patch.com/new-hampshire/salem-nh/worcester-man-indicted-hampton-use-deepfakes-charges-rockingham-county","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read live on 2026-09-27 (Salem NH Patch, 29 June 2026). A roundup of Rockingham County Superior Court indictments; the indictment itself was not read.","independence_group":"rockingham-indictments"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["everyday_life","privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["Which AI tool was used to make the video and how it was established that the video was AI-generated.","How widely the video was seen before removal, and the victim's own account of its effects.","The start date of the harassment ('more than a year') and the nature of the 'perceived past disagreement'.","The accused's plea and any trial date; the indictment text was not read.","Whether the other 'real people' whose images appear in the video were harmed."],"geography":{"basis":"The victim lives in Hampton, New Hampshire and the indicted conduct is placed 'in Hampton' (Patch); the accused lived in Worcester, Massachusetts; the case is in Rockingham County Superior Court (Patch) and he is held at the Rockingham County House of Corrections (Seacoastonline).","court_countries":["US"],"event_countries":["US"],"affected_person_countries":["US"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case (an AI-generated deepfake depicting a real person in events that did not happen, used in a harassment campaign): Seacoastonline reports the police and affidavit account in detail and Patch separately lists the grand-jury indictment on four deepfake counts. The allegations are untested. The victim is unnamed and the accused is not named here.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-27"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The arrest-warrant affidavit, as reported by Seacoastonline, describes an 'AI-generated deepfake video' of the victim, and the grand jury indicted the man on counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes (Patch). The tool used is not identified and no forensic finding is reported.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Hampton, New Hampshire: police say a Massachusetts man harassed a Hampton resident for more than a year and posted an AI-generated deepfake video showing the resident being arrested and jailed, events police say never happened; he was indicted on four felony counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes and is held after his bail was revoked","summary":"Hampton police say a man from Worcester, Massachusetts harassed a Hampton resident for more than a year through phone calls, texts, emails and online posts, stemming from a perceived past disagreement, and kept going after the victim asked him to stop and after he was served with a stalking order of protection in October 2025. In November 2025 the victim showed police an AI-generated deepfake video that, according to the arrest-warrant affidavit, the man created to humiliate and defame him; it shows the victim being arrested and jailed and includes a structure resembling the victim's Hampton home and images of real people. A police sergeant said the depicted events never happened and that the video was posted on YouTube. A Rockingham County grand jury indicted the man on four Class B felony counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes under RSA 638:26-a, for creating, distributing and presenting a video of an identifiable person on 20 October, 31 October, 7 November and 13 November 2025. He turned himself in on 24 March, was released on bail, was arrested again on 26 August for alleged bail violations and is held at the Rockingham County House of Corrections. Police had the video removed. The AI tool is not named and the victim's own account is relayed only through the police.","incidentDate":"2025-10-20","incidentEndDate":"2025-11-13","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"range","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-06-29","aiSystem":"An unnamed generative-AI tool used to make a deepfake video of a real person (Hampton police and arrest-warrant affidavit via Seacoastonline); the tool is not identified","aiProduct":"Unidentified video tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse","reputational_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Police say the victim was harassed for more than a year and targeted with a posted AI-generated video falsely depicting his arrest and jailing, which the affidavit says was made to humiliate and defame him (Hampton police and affidavit via Seacoastonline; indictment via Patch).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":1,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One harassed and depicted person, the Hampton resident (Seacoastonline; the indictment counts concern 'an identifiable person', Patch). The 'real people' whose images appear in the video are not counted: no harm to them is reported. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"US-NH","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.seacoastonline.com/story/news/local/2026/09/24/hampton-police-man-charged-ai-deepfake-harassment-campaign/91897502007/","primarySourceLabel":"Seacoastonline (Portsmouth Herald), 24 September 2026: Hampton police: Man charged in AI deepfake harassment campaign","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-27T03:39:38.936126+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:39.330256+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfakes","harassment","stalking","new-hampshire","hampton","criminal-charges","rsa-638-26-a","depicted-or-impersonated"]},{"id":"2026-suito-japan-ai-csam","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'A Japanese court has sentenced a former elementary school teacher to three years and six months in prison for possessing naked images of girls created by generative artificial intelligence, among other acts, in violation of the law against child prostitution and pornography.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'生成ＡＩ（人工知能）で作成された実在する女児の「性的ディープフェイク」を所持したなどとして'; '懲役３年６月（求刑・懲役６年）の判決を言い渡した。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'懲役3年6月（求刑懲役6年）を言い渡した。実在する女児の写真を生成AI（人工知能）で加工した「性的ディープフェイク」を所持した児童買春・ポルノ禁止法違反の罪でも有罪とした。'; '25年3月に女児2人の胸や下半身が露出しているように見える加工画像を記録した携帯電話を所持した。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'名古屋地裁は名古屋市の元小学校教員の男に懲役3年6カ月の実刑判決を言い渡しました。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s7"},{"locator":"'検察側は懲役6年を求刑し、弁護側は執行猶予付き判決を求めて結審した。判決は6月4日。'","relation":"context","source_id":"s8"}],"assertion":"On 4 June 2026 the Nagoya District Court sentenced a former Nagoya municipal elementary-school teacher, aged 35, to three years and six months in prison (prosecutors had sought six years). His offences included secretly filming girls and sharing the images in a teachers' group chat, and possessing, in breach of the Act on Punishment of Activities Relating to Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, generative-AI-made nude images of two real girls.","causal_attribution":"Independent reports of the first-instance judgment by Jiji, Kyodo (via Nikkei), the Yomiuri and TV Aichi. The judgment itself was not read."},{"id":"c2","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'were created on an AI-using image-editing website based on photos of students that were sent to another member of the group.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'県警によると、勤務先の学校に保管されていた児童２人の画像を別の人物に送信。生成ＡＩによる裸の画像を作ってもらったという。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'メンバーがAI画像編集サイトで胸部や陰部を露出された姿態を描写したものであるように認識される画像を作成し、被告人が携帯電話に保存して所持していたとされる。'; '一般人が見れば当該女子児童の裸の姿態が撮影されたものであると誤信するに足りる精巧なもの'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'3月10日、自宅で女児2人の顔を基にAIの画像ソフトで生成された裸の画像2枚を'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'一般人から見れば実在する女児の裸と誤信させるに足りるほど精巧なもの'; '25年3月に女児2人の胸や下半身が露出しているように見える加工画像を記録した携帯電話を所持した。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"}],"assertion":"The teacher sent photos of the girls, taken in his class and elsewhere at the school where he worked, to another member of the teachers' group, who used a generative-AI image-editing website to make images showing them apparently naked. The teacher kept the images on his phone; the indictment dates his possession to 10 March 2025. The court described the images as realistic enough that an ordinary person could mistake them for photographs of the girls.","causal_attribution":"Court findings as reported by Jiji and by Bengoshi.com from the judgment summary, and the police account reported by the Yomiuri at indictment. The website and the group member who made the images are not identified."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'うち１点は教員グループのチャットで共有していた。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"One of the two AI-made images was shared in the teachers' group chat.","causal_attribution":"Reported by the Yomiuri alone, citing the indictment and related records; not found in the other bodies read."},{"id":"c5","status":"corroborated","evidence":[{"locator":"'一連の事件は、被告が昨年３月、駅構内で女性のリュックに体液をかけた器物損壊容疑で逮捕されたことで発覚した。'; '愛知、東京、神奈川など５都道県の７人が逮捕・起訴された。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'全メンバーとされる5都道県の元教員ら7人が逮捕、起訴された。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'was a member of a group of seven elementary and junior high school teachers who are believed to have shared secretly filmed images of girls on social media.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The teachers' group came to light after the teacher's arrest in March 2025, and seven members, current and former teachers from five prefectures, were arrested and charged.","causal_attribution":"The group's size and discovery are reported independently by the Yomiuri, Kyodo and Jiji."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'marked the first case in Japan in which the law has been applied to the possession of AI-generated sexual deepfakes.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'性的ディープフェイクを巡り、児童ポルノの所持と認定した初の司法判断とみられる。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s5"},{"locator":"'性犯罪やわいせつ事件にくわしい奥村徹弁護士によると、生成AIによる「性的ディープフェイク」を児童ポルノと認めた司法判断は初とみられる。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'生成ＡＩで作られたわいせつ画像「性的ディープフェイク」を児童ポルノに当たると判断し、同法違反で起訴したのは全国で初めてだ。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"},{"locator":"'愛知県警によると、性的ディープフェイクを巡って、児童ポルノと認定し立件するのは全国で初めて。'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s4"},{"locator":"'着衣の児童の画像にAIで裸体を描き加えたものは、従来の判例に照らせば「児童ポルノにはあたらない」と指摘する。'","relation":"context","source_id":"s6"},{"locator":"'生成AIで加工した画像の所持も児童買春・ポルノ禁止法違反と認定した初のケース。'; '処罰の必要があるというなら、それを可能にする法律を作ればいい。'","relation":"context","source_id":"s9"}],"assertion":"Jiji reported that this was the first case in Japan applying the child-pornography law to possession of AI-generated sexual deepfakes. Kyodo (via Nikkei) and the lawyer Toru Okumura (via Bengoshi.com) describe the ruling as apparently the first court finding of this kind, and the Yomiuri and Aichi police described the December 2025 indictment as the first in Japan. Okumura and former judge Kiichi Okaguchi argue that the law does not cover AI-drawn bodies and that new legislation is needed.","causal_attribution":"The 'first' characterisation is attributed to Jiji, Kyodo, a lawyer, the Yomiuri and the Aichi police. Kyodo and the lawyer hedge it with 'apparently' (とみられる), so it stays reported."}],"effects":[{"label":"two schoolgirls were depicted apparently naked in AI-made images produced from their school photos and possessed by a teacher at their school, who was convicted","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.nippon.com/en/news/yjj2026060401022/","kind":"news_agency_report","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Jiji Press English wire on Nippon.com, datelined Nagoya, 5 June 2026 (the historical primary). The live URL now returns 404; read on 2026-09-27 from the Internet Archive capture of 6 June 2026.","independence_group":"jiji"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/20260604-GYT1T00253/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Yomiuri Shimbun Online, 4 June 2026, read live on 2026-09-27 (full free text). Japanese original read by the research agent (machine-assisted reading, no human translator); quoted locators are the Japanese text.","independence_group":"yomiuri"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/20251205-GYT1T00294/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Yomiuri Shimbun Online, 5 December 2025 (the additional indictment), read live on 2026-09-27; cites the prefectural police on how the images were made. Japanese original read by the research agent (machine-assisted reading, no human translator); quoted locators are the Japanese text.","independence_group":"yomiuri"},{"id":"s4","url":"https://www.chunichi.co.jp/article/1174740","kind":"local_newspaper","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Chunichi Shimbun Web, 5 December 2025 (the additional indictment), read live on 2026-09-27; the free text is truncated after the first sentence of the indictment summary. Japanese original read by the research agent (machine-assisted reading, no human translator); quoted locators are the Japanese text.","independence_group":"chunichi"},{"id":"s5","url":"https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUD047NO0U6A600C2000000/","kind":"news_agency_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Nikkei, 4 June 2026, a Kyodo News story (credited 〔共同〕), read live on 2026-09-27. Japanese original read by the research agent (machine-assisted reading, no human translator); quoted locators are the Japanese text.","independence_group":"kyodo"},{"id":"s6","url":"https://www.bengo4.com/c_23/n_20720/","kind":"legal_press","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Bengoshi.com News, 31 July 2026, read on 2026-09-27 from the Internet Archive capture of 25 September 2026 (the live page returned 403). Reports the judgment summary (判決要旨) and interviews lawyer Toru Okumura, who questions the legal interpretation. Japanese original read by the research agent (machine-assisted reading, no human translator); quoted locators are the Japanese text.","independence_group":"bengo4"},{"id":"s7","url":"https://topics.smt.docomo.ne.jp/article/tvaichi/region/tvaichi-20260604-1857-09599","kind":"local_tv_news_syndicated_copy","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"TV Aichi report of 4 June 2026 on the NTT docomo news portal, read live on 2026-09-27. It covers the sentence and the judge's reasons; it does not mention the AI images. Japanese original read by the research agent (machine-assisted reading, no human translator); quoted locators are the Japanese text.","independence_group":"tv-aichi"},{"id":"s8","url":"https://www.sankei.com/article/20260428-4MNPT4EDKVKTHBKA3KUN73GKRI/","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Sankei Shimbun, 28 April 2026 (prosecution's closing and six-year demand), read live on 2026-09-27. Japanese original read by the research agent (machine-assisted reading, no human translator); quoted locators are the Japanese text.","independence_group":"sankei"},{"id":"s9","url":"https://topics.smt.docomo.ne.jp/article/nikkan_spa/trend/nikkan_spa-2183894","kind":"legal_commentary","access":"read","language":"ja","translation_note":"Nikkan SPA! column by former judge Kiichi Okaguchi, 14 September 2026, on the NTT docomo news portal, read on 2026-09-27 (first page). It criticises the ruling's interpretation of the law. Japanese original read by the research agent (machine-assisted reading, no human translator); quoted locators are the Japanese text.","independence_group":"nikkan-spa"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["education","privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["Whether the sentence was appealed or has become final. Coverage read up to 14 September 2026 does not say.","Which AI image-editing website was used, and which group member made the images.","The number of other pupils harmed by the defendant's non-AI offences. Bengoshi.com reports 15 counts in the judgment, and a Yomiuri headline of 31 May 2026 reports more than 75 victimised children in the group case as a whole; neither figure is specific to the AI images.","When the AI images were made. The indictment dates the possession to 10 March 2025."],"geography":{"basis":"The defendant was a teacher at a Nagoya municipal elementary school (Aichi Prefecture), and the photos were of pupils at that school (Yomiuri citing police; Bengoshi.com citing the judgment summary). The possession was at his home, according to the indictment summary (Chunichi). The court is the Nagoya District Court.","court_countries":["JP"],"event_countries":["JP"],"affected_person_countries":["JP"]},"publication":{"basis":"Restored under the 2026-09-15 charter as a depicted-minor case decided by a court. The conviction and the AI method are reported independently by Jiji, Kyodo, the Yomiuri and Bengoshi.com (from the judgment summary). The 'first in Japan' characterisation is attributed and recorded together with the dissenting legal commentary. The teacher is described by role and the girls are not identified.","reviewed_on":"2026-09-27"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"Jiji reports that the judge recognised the images as created on an AI image-editing website from photos of the pupils. Bengoshi.com quotes the judgment summary: a group member made the images on an AI image-editing site. The Aichi police account at indictment (Yomiuri) gives the same method. The website is not identified.","status":"supported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Nagoya, Japan: a former elementary-school teacher was sentenced on 4 June 2026 to three and a half years, including for possessing generative-AI nude images made from school photos of two girls; reported as Japan's first conviction applying the child-pornography law to AI deepfakes","summary":"On 4 June 2026 the Nagoya District Court sentenced a 35-year-old former Nagoya municipal elementary-school teacher to three years and six months in prison. Prosecutors had sought six years. He was one of seven current and former teachers from five prefectures charged over a group chat in which members shared secretly filmed images of girls. His offences included secret filming and sharing, and, under the child-pornography law, possessing two generative-AI images showing two real girls apparently naked. According to the police and the judgment summary, he sent photos of the girls from the school where he taught to another member of the group, who made the images on an AI image-editing website. The teacher kept them on his phone, and one was shared in the chat. The judge found the images realistic enough to be mistaken for photographs of the girls. Jiji called it the first case in Japan applying the law to possession of AI-generated sexual deepfakes, and Kyodo called it apparently the first such court finding. A lawyer and a former judge argue the law was stretched.","incidentDate":"2025-03-10","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"day","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2025-12-05","aiSystem":"Generative-AI image-editing website (not identified) used by a member of the teachers' group to make nude images from photos of the pupils","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"high","verificationStatus":"verified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Two girls were depicted apparently naked in AI-made images produced from their school photos, which a teacher at their school possessed; one was shared in a teachers' group chat (Yomiuri). The Nagoya District Court convicted him of possessing child pornography as part of a three-and-a-half-year sentence (Jiji, Kyodo via Nikkei, Yomiuri, Bengoshi.com citing the judgment summary). The girls' own experience is not reported.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":2,"affectedCountStatus":"partial","affectedCountEvidence":"Two girls are depicted in the AI images (Kyodo via Nikkei: '女児2人'; Chunichi: '女児2人の顔を基に'). The defendant's other offences harmed further pupils and a 15-year-old girl in numbers not reported for him specifically. Images are not counted as people.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"JP","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"criminal_charges","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.nippon.com/en/news/yjj2026060401022/","primarySourceLabel":"Jiji Press via Nippon.com, 5 June 2026: Japan Court Recognizes AI-Created Naked Girl Images as Child Porn","firstPublishedAt":"2026-06-14T11:10:34.612642+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-09-30T01:17:55.264515+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["csam","deepfake","minor","school","teacher","conviction","japan","nagoya","depicted-or-impersonated","restored"]}]}