{"meta":{"exportedAt":"2026-10-23T07:22:21.664Z","formatVersion":2,"selection":{"q":"gb","system":"","harm":"","context":"","country":"","role":"","relation":"core","evidence":"","year":"unknown","response":"","severity":"","verification":"","view":"incidents","sort":"added"},"totalIncidents":3,"coverage":{"cases":3,"countries":1,"languages":2,"unknownLocation":2,"locationPending":0,"unknownLanguage":0,"unknownDate":3,"lawsuits":0,"regulatory":1,"minors":1,"coreRelations":3,"contextualRelations":0,"mixedRelations":0,"unknownRelations":0,"relationPending":0,"relationUnknown":0},"countingNote":"Distinct public cases in this selection. People counts apply within individual cases only; cross-case person overlap has not been resolved. No population incidence estimate.","affectedCountNote":"Interpret person counts with affectedCountStatus and the reported effects. Unquantified zeros are placeholders, not a measured zero.","source":"AI incidents","publisher":"NOPE","url":"https://nope.net/incidents","license":"CC BY 4.0"},"incidents":[{"id":"2026-codex-agent-deleted-main-project-worktree-in-long-session-uncommitted-work-lost-first-person-issue","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'In one recent case, Codex deleted the main project worktree.'; 'The repository was under Git, so part of the damage was recoverable, but some uncommitted work was lost and I had to recover additional files from a Time Machine backup.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The issue reports that in one recent case Codex deleted the main project worktree, that part of the damage was recoverable because the repository was under Git, that some uncommitted work was lost and that additional files had to be recovered from a Time Machine backup.","causal_attribution":"The author attributes the deletion to Codex."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'they must never delete or damage the primary working tree.'; 'including AGENTS.md and project governance files'; 'Over time I have ended up with a very large amount of stale worktree/cache data, on the order of ~100 GB.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author says their repository governance files, including AGENTS.md, tell agents that they may create temporary worktrees but must never delete or damage the primary working tree, and that Codex sometimes leaves worktrees uncleaned, accumulating about 100 GB of stale worktree and cache data.","causal_attribution":"Author's account of their own configuration and observations."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'My orchestrator runs GPT-6.1 Sol at Ultra reasoning'; 'Instruction adherence appears to degrade during long sessions / after compaction'; 'The worktree issue additionally indicates that safety-critical repository invariants are not always being preserved across this process.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The issue states the setup as Codex CLI v0.160.1 running GPT-6.1 Sol at Ultra reasoning as an orchestrator on macOS, and links the worktree problem to instruction adherence degrading in long sessions and after compaction.","causal_attribution":"Author's interpretation."}],"effects":[{"label":"main project worktree deleted; some uncommitted work lost and other files restored from a Time Machine backup (author's account)","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/51672","kind":"first_person_account","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-08: the issue body including the attached Codex doctor report, retrieved through the GitHub API; no comments existed. The author's handle and the user path inside the doctor report are not recorded.","independence_group":"github-codex-51672-author"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["When the worktree deletion happened; the issue says only 'in one recent case'.","What the lost uncommitted work was and how much of it was unrecoverable.","Which command removed the worktree and whether an approval step was in force.","Where the author lives.","Whether OpenAI responded to the issue."],"geography":{"basis":"The issue does not say where the author was or lives. No country is recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the charter's public first-person rule as a concrete account of an AI coding agent deleting a user's main project worktree with uncommitted work lost, attributed throughout to the author's issue and uncorroborated; the deletion date is unknown and the loss is modest, so severity is low. The author's handle is not recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-08"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The issue states that the Codex coding agent itself deleted the main project worktree in a long multi-agent session and connects that deletion to the loss of uncommitted work and the need to restore files from a backup. The account is the author's own and no other source describes the event.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["acted_on_behalf"]},"name":"GitHub issue by a Codex user: the coding agent deleted the main project worktree during a long session and some uncommitted work was lost, user says","summary":"In a GitHub issue filed on 7 October 2026 in the OpenAI Codex repository, a developer who runs the Codex coding agent in long multi-agent sessions on large repositories reports that in one recent case the agent deleted the main project worktree. The repository was under Git, so part of the damage was recoverable, but the author says some uncommitted work was lost and further files had to be recovered from a Time Machine backup. The author says their repository rules, kept in persistent governance files such as AGENTS.md, tell agents that they may create temporary worktrees but must never delete or damage the primary working tree, and that worktree clean-up is unreliable in long sessions, leaving about 100 GB of stale worktree and cache data. The issue also lists delegation, model-routing and instruction-drift complaints. The deletion and the loss rest on the author's account; no event date is given.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"repeated_interactions","reportedDate":"2026-10-07","aiSystem":"OpenAI Codex CLI v0.160.1 running GPT-6.1 Sol at Ultra reasoning as an orchestrator with sub-agents and Git worktrees on macOS, per the issue","aiProduct":"Codex coding agent (reported)","aiCompany":"OpenAI","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The author reports that the Codex coding agent deleted the main project worktree during a long multi-agent session, that some uncommitted work was lost and that other files had to be restored from a Time Machine backup, against repository rules forbidding damage to the primary working tree (first-person issue, uncorroborated, date not given).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the issue's author. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"agent","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/51672","primarySourceLabel":"GitHub issue openai/codex #51672, 7 October 2026: long-running sessions, instruction drift, worktree lifecycle failures and primary worktree deletion","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-08T03:27:55.675902+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T07:32:49.132978+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","github-issue","codex","ai-agent","coding-agent","data-loss","worktree","instruction-drift","acted-on-behalf"]},{"id":"2026-claude-code-sub-agent-auto-mode-recursive-delete-wiped-windows-drive-root-about-125-gb-first-person","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'a background subagent (auto mode, Claude Code desktop app) passed a bash script to MSYS2 inside a PowerShell double-quoted string'; 'meant to delete a temporary folder'; 'which MSYS2 treats as the root of the current drive'; 'Auto mode approved the command'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author reports that a background Claude Code sub-agent in auto mode passed a bash script inside a PowerShell string whose last step was meant to delete a temporary folder, and that bash instead received a recursive delete of the drive root, which auto mode approved.","causal_attribution":"Author attributes the script and the command to the sub-agent."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'It deleted everything the user could delete from C:\\ in alphabetical order, until stopped about two minutes later'; 'about 125 GB of personal and project folders at the drive root'; 'the whole working project'; 'files inside several installed programs (Adobe, Epic Games/Unreal, AMD and others)'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author reports that the command deleted files from C: in alphabetical order for about two minutes, including about 125 GB of personal and project folders, the whole working project and files inside several installed programs.","causal_attribution":"Author's account."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Nothing went to the Recycle Bin'; 'Recovery was only possible from a Windows shadow copy taken nine hours earlier'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The author reports that nothing went to the Recycle Bin and that recovery was only possible from a Windows shadow copy taken nine hours earlier.","causal_attribution":"Author's account."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'CLAUDE MODEL Opus 5.5 (a general-purpose subagent in the background)'; 'Windows 11 Pro 10.0.26200'; '2.9939.2'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"}],"assertion":"The issue records the Claude Code desktop app version 2.9939.2 and the model Opus 5.5 running as a general-purpose sub-agent in the background on Windows 11 Pro.","causal_attribution":"Not applicable."}],"effects":[{"label":"about 125 GB of personal and project folders, the working project and installed-program files deleted (author's account)","claim_id":"c2","direction":"negative"},{"label":"recovery possible only from a shadow copy taken nine hours earlier (author's account)","claim_id":"c3","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/97660","kind":"first_person_account","access":"read","language":"en","translation_note":"Read in English on 2026-10-06: full issue body retrieved through the GitHub API; the issue had no comments. The transcripts and output log offered on request were not retrieved. The author handle is not recorded.","independence_group":"github-claude-code-97660-author"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["own_use"],"contexts":["work"],"unknowns":["The date of the deletion; the issue was filed on 27 September 2026 and gives no event date.","How much of the deleted data and installed software was restored from the shadow copy, and what changes after it were lost.","Whether Anthropic has confirmed or responded to the report.","Where the author lives."],"geography":{"basis":"The issue does not say where the author was or lives; no country is recorded.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":[],"affected_person_countries":[]},"publication":{"basis":"Published under the charter's public first-person rule as a concrete account of an AI coding agent's own cleanup command deleting a user's files and programs after automatic approval, described with attribution and without corroboration. The author's handle is not recorded.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-06"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The author states that a Claude Code background sub-agent wrote and ran the PowerShell-wrapped bash script whose cleanup step became a recursive delete of the drive root, that auto mode approved it, and attributes the deletions to it, quoting the command output. The transcripts were not examined.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["acted_on_behalf"]},"name":"First-person GitHub issue: Claude Code user reports an auto-mode sub-agent turned a temp-folder cleanup into a delete of the Windows drive root (about 125 GB)","summary":"In a public GitHub issue filed on 27 September 2026, a Claude Code desktop app user on Windows reports that a background sub-agent running in auto mode passed a bash script inside a PowerShell string, meaning to delete a temporary folder. Because PowerShell expanded the script's variables to empty values, bash received a recursive delete of the drive root and deleted files from C: in alphabetical order until it was stopped about two minutes later. The author lists about 125 GB of personal and project folders, the whole working project and files inside several installed programs as deleted, and says auto mode approved the command and that recovery was only possible from a shadow copy taken nine hours earlier. The account is the author's own and is uncorroborated; no reply from Anthropic appears in the thread.","incidentKind":"single_event","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"single_interaction","reportedDate":"2026-09-27","aiSystem":"Claude Code desktop app 2.9939.2 (Code tab), a general-purpose background sub-agent running Opus 5.5 in auto mode on Windows 11 Pro, using the PowerShell tool to call MSYS2 bash, per the issue","aiProduct":"Claude Code (reported)","aiCompany":"Anthropic","severity":"low","verificationStatus":"unverified","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["property_loss","other_material_harm"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"The author reports that a Claude Code background sub-agent, approved by auto mode, ran a recursive delete that wiped about 125 GB of personal and project folders, their working project and parts of installed programs from a Windows drive, recoverable only from a nine-hour-old shadow copy (first-person account, uncorroborated).","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"alleged","participantUsersAffectedMin":1,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"exact","affectedCountEvidence":"One person: the issue's author. Exact 1.","victimAgeRange":"unknown","jurisdiction":"unknown","platformType":"agent","outcomeStatus":"ongoing","primarySourceUrl":"https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/97660","primarySourceLabel":"GitHub issue anthropics/claude-code #97660, 27 September 2026: sub-agent recursive delete via PowerShell and MSYS2 wiped the C: drive top-down","firstPublishedAt":"2026-10-06T03:11:02.761476+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T07:32:36.674197+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["first-person","github-issue","claude-code","anthropic","ai-agent","sub-agent","auto-mode","data-loss","file-deletion","windows","drive-root","acted-on-behalf"]},{"id":"2026-berlin-school-alleged-ai-sexual-images-classmates","caseFacts":{"claims":[{"id":"c1","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Jugendliche sollen KI-Nacktbilder von Mitschülerinnen an Berliner Schule verbreitet haben'; 'Das steht in einem internen Schreiben der Schulleitung an Eltern der Schule, das dem Tagesspiegel vorliegt.'; 'Den Schülern sollen mindestens drei Fälle vorgeworfen werden.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Zwei Jugendliche sollen Deepfakes von Mitschülerinnen erstellt und verschickt haben. Gemeint sind sexualisierte Nacktbilder, die mit KI generiert wurden. Den beiden Schülern werden mindestens drei Fälle vorgeworfen.'; 'Das geht aus einem schulinternen Schreiben hervor, das dieser Redaktion vorliegt.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"According to the school leadership's letter to parents, as reported by two Berlin newspapers that say they hold it, two pupils at a Berlin school are suspected of creating and distributing AI-generated sexualised nude images of female classmates, with at least three cases alleged.","causal_attribution":"The school's letter as read by Der Tagesspiegel and the Berliner Morgenpost; both outlets rest on the same letter, so this is one origin. The allegation against the two pupils has not been tried."},{"id":"c2","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Die beiden mutmaßlich hauptverantwortlichen Schüler seien mit sofortiger Wirkung vom Unterricht suspendiert worden.'; 'Als Reaktion wolle die Schule ihr Präventionskonzept sowie das Konzept zur Sexualerziehung überarbeiten.'; 'Außerdem habe sie Eltern dazu aufgerufen, mit ihren Kindern über den Umgang mit Fotos anderer Personen und mit KI-Anwendungen zu sprechen.'; 'Zudem habe die Schule Maßnahmen gegen Schülerinnen und Schüler verhängt, die von den Bildern gewusst, die Vorfälle jedoch nicht gemeldet haben sollen.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Die beiden Hauptverantwortlichen seien mit sofortiger Wirkung vom Unterricht suspendiert.'; '„Ebenso sind schulische Maßnahmen für die Schüler verhängt worden, denen die Bilder gezeigt wurden, dies jedoch nicht gemeldet haben“, heißt es weiter.'; 'Die Schulleitung bezeichnet die Taten derweil als „einen massiven Angriff auf die Persönlichkeitsrechte der betroffenen Schülerinnen sowie eine Form sexualisierter Gewalt“.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"}],"assertion":"The school suspended the two pupils it holds mainly responsible from lessons with immediate effect and imposed school measures on pupils who had been shown the images or knew of them and did not report them. The letter calls the acts a massive attack on the personality rights of the affected girls and a form of sexualised violence, says the school will revise its prevention and sex-education concepts, and asks parents to talk with their children about other people's photos and AI tools.","causal_attribution":"The school's letter as reported by both newspapers (one origin)."},{"id":"c3","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'Die Senatsverwaltung für Bildung bestätigte dem Tagesspiegel die Vorfälle und die laufenden Ermittlungen.'; 'Im konkreten Fall hat die Schulleitung sofort nach Bekanntwerden der Vorgänge gehandelt: Die Schulgemeinschaft wurde informiert, Ordnungs- beziehungsweise Erziehungsmaßnahmen kommen zur Anwendung und umgehend wurde die Polizei eingeschaltet.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Die Bildungssenatsverwaltung bestätigte die Vorfälle sowie die Ermittlungen der Polizei.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s2"},{"locator":"'Die Senatsverwaltung für Bildung teilte mit, Fälle sexualisierter Gewalt an Schulen grundsätzlich sehr ernst zu nehmen. Die Schulleitung habe sofort nach Bekanntwerden der Vorgänge gehandelt.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"The Senate Department for Education confirmed the incidents and the police investigation and said the school leadership acted as soon as it learned of them: the school community was informed, disciplinary or educational measures were applied and the police were called in at once.","causal_attribution":"The education administration's statement as given to the newspapers and the news agency (one origin)."},{"id":"c4","status":"reported","evidence":[{"locator":"'„Es liegen Anzeigen wegen der Erstellung sogenannter Deepfakes vor“, sagte ein Sprecher der Berliner Polizei.'; 'Die Ermittlungen dazu habe die Abteilung des Landeskriminalamts übernommen, die für Sexualdelikte zum Nachteil Minderjähriger zuständig sei.'; 'Dabei komme eine Strafbarkeit wegen des Besitzes, der Beschaffung, der Erstellung oder Verbreitung von Jugendpornografie nach Paragraf 184 c des Strafgesetzbuchs in Betracht.'; 'Auch unter Opferschutzgesichtspunkten nenne die Polizei keine weiteren Details.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s1"},{"locator":"'Die Berliner Polizei hat Ermittlungen aufgenommen, wie ein Sprecher der Deutschen Presse-Agentur sagte. Zu Details oder ersten Ergebnissen seien aber noch keine Auskünfte möglich.'","relation":"supports","source_id":"s3"}],"assertion":"A Berlin police spokesman said complaints had been filed over the creation of so-called deepfakes and that the State Criminal Police Office unit responsible for sexual offences against minors had taken over the investigation, with liability for possessing, obtaining, creating or distributing youth pornography under section 184c of the Criminal Code under consideration. The police gave no further details, citing victim protection.","causal_attribution":"The police spokesman's statements as quoted by Der Tagesspiegel (with dpa) and by the dpa-based rbb24 report; one origin. No technical basis for the deepfake description was disclosed."}],"effects":[{"label":"female pupils depicted in AI-generated sexualised nude images distributed among pupils, which the school called a form of sexualised violence","claim_id":"c1","direction":"negative"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/schule/polizei-eingeschaltet-jugendliche-sollen-ki-nacktbilder-von-mitschulerinnen-an-berliner-schule-verbreitet-haben-15754057.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read live in German on 2026-10-18 (Der Tagesspiegel, 24 June 2026, marked 'Update', with dpa). Own reporting from the school leadership's letter to parents, which the paper says it holds, plus statements from the Senate Department for Education, a Berlin police spokesman and the district parents' committee. Translated by the research agent (an AI).","independence_group":"tagesspiegel"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://www.morgenpost.de/bezirke/pankow/article412379915/deepfake-nacktbilder-an-berliner-schule-verbreitet-polizei-ermittelt.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read live in German on 2026-10-18 (Berliner Morgenpost, first report, published 24 June 2026, modified 29 June 2026). Own reporting from the same school letter, which the paper says it holds, plus the school's parents' council and the Senate Department for Education. The letter is the same origin as in s1. Translated by the research agent (an AI).","independence_group":"berliner-morgenpost"},{"id":"s3","url":"https://www.rbb24.de/panorama/beitrag/2026/06/ki-nacktbilder-berliner-schule-polizei-ermittelt.html","kind":"news_report","access":"read","language":"de","translation_note":"Read live in German on 2026-10-18 (rbb24, 25 June 2026). Agency-based report: the police statement was given to the Deutsche Presse-Agentur, and the suspension detail is credited to the Berliner Morgenpost. Translated by the research agent (an AI).","independence_group":"dpa"}],"version":1,"ai_roles":["others_use"],"contexts":["education","privacy","justice"],"unknowns":["How many girls were depicted; 'at least three cases' is a count of alleged acts, not of persons.","The ages of the suspects and of the depicted pupils, and the tool used.","How the school and the police established that the images were AI-generated; no technical basis was disclosed.","When the images were made and how they were distributed. The discovery date is uncertain: Der Tagesspiegel reports the letter as saying the school learned of the incidents on the previous Friday, while the Berliner Morgenpost says the school learned on a Friday a good week before its 24 June 2026 report and sent the letter the previous Monday, which points to 12 or 19 June 2026.","Whether charges followed; no development after June 2026 was found on 2026-10-18.","No account from the depicted girls has been published."],"geography":{"basis":"A school in Berlin; Berlin police, the State Criminal Police Office and the Senate Department for Education (Der Tagesspiegel; Berliner Morgenpost; rbb24). No court proceeding reported.","court_countries":[],"event_countries":["DE"],"affected_person_countries":["DE"]},"publication":{"basis":"Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated). The school's letter to parents, read by two Berlin newspapers, says two pupils are suspected of creating and distributing AI-generated sexualised nude images of female classmates; the school suspended them, the education administration confirmed the incidents, and police said complaints over the creation of deepfakes are being investigated by a unit for sexual offences against minors. All claims are reported. The school, its district and the pupils are not named.","reviewed_on":"2026-10-18"},"ai_involvement":{"basis":"The school leadership's letter to parents, as read by Der Tagesspiegel and the Berliner Morgenpost, describes KI-generated sexualised nude images made by misusing photographs of female classmates, and the school suspended the two pupils it holds mainly responsible. A Berlin police spokesman said complaints concern the creation of so-called deepfakes and that the unit for sexual offences against minors is investigating. Neither the school nor the police disclosed the tool used or the technical basis for the AI description. The images depicted the girls; no AI system interacted with them.","status":"reported"},"person_relations":["depicted_or_impersonated"]},"name":"Berlin school suspends two pupils and police investigate over alleged AI-generated sexual images of female classmates","summary":"A Berlin school told parents that two pupils were suspected of creating and distributing AI-generated sexualised nude images of female classmates in at least three cases. The school suspended the two pupils, the education administration confirmed the incidents, and police said a unit for sexual offences against minors was investigating complaints over deepfakes. No charge or outcome has been reported.","incidentKind":"bounded_series","incidentDatePrecision":"unknown","exposurePattern":"unknown","reportedDate":"2026-06-24","aiSystem":"AI image-generation ('deepfake') tool, not named","aiProduct":"Unidentified image tool","severity":"medium","verificationStatus":"credible","harmCategories":[],"harmOutcomes":["exploitation_or_abuse"],"harmOutcomeSummary":"Female pupils were depicted in sexualised nude images that, according to the school's letter, two pupils generated with AI and distributed; the school calls this a massive attack on the girls' personality rights and a form of sexualised violence. Police say complaints were filed over the creation of so-called deepfakes and a unit for sexual offences against minors is investigating. No account from the depicted girls has been published.","frameworkFacets":[],"causationStatus":"supported","participantUsersAffectedMin":0,"otherPeopleHarmedMin":0,"affectedCountStatus":"unquantified","affectedCountEvidence":"The reports speak of 'Mitschülerinnen' (female classmates, plural) and of 'mindestens drei Fälle' (at least three cases) alleged against the two pupils, without stating how many girls were depicted; a count of cases is not a count of persons. Unquantified, with zero placeholders.","victimAgeRange":"minor","jurisdiction":"DE-BE","platformType":"other","outcomeType":"investigation_opened","outcomeStatus":"unknown","primarySourceUrl":"https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/schule/polizei-eingeschaltet-jugendliche-sollen-ki-nacktbilder-von-mitschulerinnen-an-berliner-schule-verbreitet-haben-15754057.html","primarySourceLabel":"Der Tagesspiegel, 24 June 2026","firstPublishedAt":"2026-09-22T03:45:58.07027+00:00","updatedAt":"2026-10-18T03:07:51.900886+00:00","scopeVersion":"facts-v3","tags":["deepfake","ai-generated-imagery","ncii","minor","school","germany","berlin","184c-stgb","depicted"]}]}